RE: TACACS - Cheap or Free [7:70764]

2003-06-16 Thread Moffett, Ryan
how about tac_plus from Cisco, also found on several other places around the 'net? It's free, and open source. -Original Message- From: Vance Krier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TACACS - Cheap or Free [7:70764] Hey

RE: CCNP Recertification [7:62038]

2003-01-28 Thread Moffett, Ryan
Yes, and I just reinforced my knowledge of this having just my CCNP expire this past Friday without taking the recert exam. Even though I have my CCDP, I have to take all CCNP tests over again. -Original Message- From: Bolton, Travis D [LTD] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday,

RE: Cisco PDM and Manual configuration [7:58555]

2002-12-04 Thread Moffett, Ryan
PDM gets messed up once in a while if command line changes are made. I cannot remember specifics of the scenarios in which this happens, however from the command line under config mode, clear pdm seems to keep things on track. It resets the PDM configuration and the next time PDM is run, it

RE: Programming Language for Network Engingeers. [7:58032]

2002-11-25 Thread Moffett, Ryan
Perl - Use it to do many things like parsing log files, parsing and even generating config files. Too many uses to list. Once you learn what perl is and what it can do, you WILL find uses for it. Expect - Use it to script things that otherwise would only be able to occur interactively with

RE: Programming Language for Network Engingeers. [7:58032]

2002-11-25 Thread Moffett, Ryan
Administration Exploring Expect -Original Message- From: John Tafasi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:58 PM To: Moffett, Ryan; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Programming Language for Network Engingeers. [7:58032] This a nice answer, but do you know any book

CSS11800 for content network specialist on ebay $6 [7:57709]

2002-11-19 Thread Moffett, Ryan
can anyone believe how cheap these are going for? It makes it pretty reasonable to get one for the content network specialist certification. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2070179172 http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2066928817 $665 was the end price for

RE: CPU Utilization on Cat3548XL - a mystery.. [7:57494]

2002-11-15 Thread Moffett, Ryan
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:simonkc;netsol.co.in] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 8:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CPU Utilization on Cat3548XL - a mystery.. [7:57494] I have an out-of-the-box Catalyst3548XL switch .There are no user connections nor trunk

RE: CPU Utilization on Cat3548XL - a mystery.. [7:57494]

2002-11-15 Thread Moffett, Ryan
Strange, my sent items shows the URL I pasted, but the URL was cut out on the message to the group...what gives? Anyway, http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/473/19.html should give you all you need. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:simonkc;netsol.co.in] Sent: Friday,

RE: Questions before tests [7:56452]

2002-10-29 Thread Moffett, Ryan
The way I interpret this is that the answers you provide will be evaluated against your score and performance for future development of tests, including future scoring mechanisms on exams that are authored. I don't think it is real-time modification of question pools or scoring criteria. I

RE: IOS upgrade/Strange services [7:53492]

2002-09-18 Thread Moffett, Ryan
...an inbound ACL on the interfaces you want to protect would effectively kill access to these ports, but some of the ports you have mentioned are difficult to explain and lack command-line parameters to control, like biff for instance. Biff happens to run on UDP port 512. Can you

RE: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] 2nd Terry Slattery quote [7:52169]

2002-08-27 Thread Moffett, Ryan
Well, the online verification system says that Stuart Biggs is CCIE 1025, though the current status is Inactive. -Original Message- From: Chuck Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 5:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] 2nd Terry

RE: Check this new command out [7:49717]

2002-07-26 Thread Moffett, Ryan
I have the do command in config mode (in c3640-i-mz.122-5d.bin), but the output is only: router(config)#do ? . Version number -Original Message- From: Dan Penn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 11:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Check this new command

RE: Check this new command out [7:49717]

2002-07-26 Thread Moffett, Ryan
What code rev is this in? I have some 12.2(5)+ and I don't see it. Is this just in specific 12.1 Development Test images? -Original Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 10:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Check this new command out

RE: How to keep multiple switch ports on the same VLAN from [7:49521]

2002-07-24 Thread Moffett, Ryan
The 2924XL platform does support PVLANs if it can be upgraded to 12.0(5)XU or higher code which is based on a number of factors including memory. The XL-EN is questionable. 4MB 2924XL switches cannot run the 12.0(5)XU and higher code. For what you are trying to do, PVLANs are the only way to

RE: Off Topic - Whither IS-IS - Cisco's vision going forward [7:49061]

2002-07-17 Thread Moffett, Ryan
I attended Networkers 2002 in San Diego and got the impression to look out for more IS-IS in the future. Specifically, Cisco is working to achieve feature parity between OSPF and IS-IS, plus comments were made in the Router Architecture Power Session that IS-IS is getting a stronger Enterprise

RE: InfoWorld article on Routing SOAP [7:46577]

2002-06-14 Thread Moffett, Ryan
There are a number of vendors creating XML switches, see: http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2002/132046_04-29-2002.html. From my perspective, I think of these Content Aware Switches specializing in XML. These have some things in common with Cisco Content Service Switches, but are tailored to XML

RE: CCIE Lab Exam Changes - Token Ring [7:46481]

2002-06-13 Thread Moffett, Ryan
DLSW can still be configured and tested without Token Ring. -Original Message- From: Khalsa Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 2:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE Lab Exam Changes - Token Ring [7:46481] I'm in the middle of buying CCIE Lab

RE: CCIE Lab Exam Changes - Token Ring [7:46481]

2002-06-13 Thread Moffett, Ryan
The following links deal with DLSw and Ethernet, and DLSw topics in general http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/697/3.html http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/697/3.html http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/697/index.shtml http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/697/index.shtml -Original Message-

RE: CCIE Lab Exam Changes - Token Ring [7:46481]

2002-06-13 Thread Moffett, Ryan
My take is that while Token Ring will not be there, Ethernet will. And as such, DLSw is still a subject that can be tested. If they are removing Token Ring, then the SRB facets of DLSw are going to be dropped. -Original Message- From: Khalsa Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

RE: CCIE Lab Question Mark [7:45980]

2002-06-07 Thread Moffett, Ryan
That's absolutely not true. In order to do something like that, they would have to custom compile IOS code specific to the CCIE Lab to have that removed. Believe me, the ? is an integral part of working with Cisco devices from the command line. -Original Message- From: Robert McBride

RE: CCIE Lab Question Mark [7:45980]

2002-06-07 Thread Moffett, Ryan
I attempted the lab back in August of 2000. Granted that was the 2day format, but the ? was available then. To remove it would be absurd. -Original Message- From: Roberts, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 5:23 PM To: Moffett, Ryan; [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Provider Backbone Engineering and CCIEs [7:44876]

2002-05-24 Thread Moffett, Ryan
Really? So I shouldn't being doing a show mem and looking at the data contained in specific memory addresses labeled *packet data* to turn my router into a sniffer? :-) -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 1:20 PM To:

RE: Doyle on Lab Rats [7:44611]

2002-05-21 Thread Moffett, Ryan
I think that everyone agrees that in order to pass the CCIE lab, you have to spend a decent amount of time in a lab playing with scenarios and technologies you might otherwise have never experienced in a real life network, or experienced it so long ago that you don't have any where else to test

RE: Bridge and switch [7:44649]

2002-05-21 Thread Moffett, Ryan
John and Mike are both right. As a matter of fact, there are several definitions. In my opinion, the whole topic is adequately described in Interconnections, by Radia Perlman. Her take (in a nutshell) is that they are technically one in the same and that the difference is marketing

RE: Router question.. [7:39788]

2002-03-28 Thread Moffett, Ryan
ISL or 802.1q trunk is an option if the interface hardware supports it. You configure 3 VLANs on the 2900. Trunk those 3 VLANs up to the 2600 and configure that Ethernet interface for ISL or 802.1q encapsulation with 3 subinterfaces, 1 for each VLAN. Another option also works on just one

RE: CCNP to CCDP [7:39448]

2002-03-25 Thread Moffett, Ryan
You can still pursue the CCDP. If you look at the certification tracking website, it should show you started your CCDP back when you started passing exams related to the CCNP or CCDA. I just did exactly the same thing. I passed my CCNP about 2 years ago and just got my CCDP with the CID

RE: CCNP to CCDP [7:39448]

2002-03-25 Thread Moffett, Ryan
My CCNP will expire in about a year unless I re-certify. My CCDP lasts 3 years from that date that I passed the CID. -Original Message- From: Daniel Ma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 3:05 PM To: Moffett, Ryan; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCNP to CCDP [7

RE: CCNP to CCDP [7:39448]

2002-03-25 Thread Moffett, Ryan
CCDA is a pre-req. -Original Message- From: Brian Zeitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 3:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCNP to CCDP [7:39448] Don't take my word for it, but don't you need the CCDA too for CCDP? Or is CCNA good enough? -Original

RE: ATM for CCIE [7:38772]

2002-03-19 Thread Moffett, Ryan
Cisco ATM Solutions, Cisco Press, by Galina Pildush. She also contributed to CCIE Practical Studies, Volume 1 by Cisco Press. ATM Theory and Applications by Spohn and McDysan is also a good reference. -Original Message- From: Matthew Meiers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday,

RE: OT/ Pass one Lab and hold two CCIE certs ? [7:38402]

2002-03-15 Thread Moffett, Ryan
CCIE = Hexadecimal CC1E = Decimal 52254. Took me a while too. :-) -Original Message- From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 2:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT/ Pass one Lab and hold two CCIE certs ? [7:38402] I'm slow guys and gals,

RE: basic OSPF questions [7:37142]

2002-03-04 Thread Moffett, Ryan
Someone else has tackled the others, I go after #1): As you probably already know, in a lab setting, loopbacks are great for building up fictional stub networks to be used in reachability testing and summarization/filtering scenarios. For example, you can create interface loopback0 with an ip