RE: Voice Over Internet [7:61467]

2003-01-21 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Hi Neil, I am doing voice over IP over the Interet with one remote location with a 512k ADSL connection and VPN with PPTP. The voice quality is extremely good, with no echos, delays etc... I am using netmeeting for the voice over ip application and Windows 2000 server on both location as the VPN

Please check my logic: ospf / frame-relay / broadcast [7:60715]

2003-01-09 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
5.255.0.0 encapsulation frame-relay IETF ip ospf priority 0 ip policy route-map 10 serial restart-delay 0 frame-relay map ip 10.10.1.1 501 frame-relay lmi-type ansi end Thank you, Pierre-Alex Guanel Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/for

OT: CCIE LAB Study partner - UK [7:60116]

2003-01-02 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
partner with ATM, Catalyst 3550 switches and Voice Equipment or someone willing to share the expense of buying those gears. Please contact me off-line if you are interested. My lab is scheduled for October 29 2003. Thank you, Pierre-Alex Guanel tel +44 (0)1695 725408 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message

Catalyst 1600 Token Ring Report - [7:56671]

2002-11-01 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
After a very long trial and error procedure and a bit of luck, I finally figured this switch out! There are no commands to setup VLANS from the command-line on this switch. You must use the TrueView Manager software which is available for free download at: http://www.madge.com/downloads-software

O.T: CCIE Lab Partner - England. [7:56378]

2002-10-27 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Anyone studying for their CCIE LAB in the Manchester / Liverpool area? I have gears & books. Let's talk offline: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56378&t=56378 -- FAQ, list a

RE: BGP Best Path Algorithm -- Trick [7:56356]

2002-10-26 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Sorry about the bad grammar. I must have been tired. Here is the same message again hopefully without typos. OK, from Cisco http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/25.shtml Step 3: Prefer the path that was locally originated via a network or aggregate BGP subcommand, or through redistribution from

BGP Best Path Algorithm -- Trick [7:56356]

2002-10-26 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
OK, from Cisco http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/25.shtml Step 3: Prefer the path that was locally originated via a network or aggregate BGP subcommand, or through redistribution from an IGP. Local paths sourced by network/redistribute commands are preferred over local aggregates sourced by the

Catalyst 1600 - Token Ring VLAN [7:56185]

2002-10-23 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
I am trying to do this on a Catalyst 1600: port 1, port 2, port 3: in vlan 1 port 4, port 5, port 6: in vlan 2 port 7 and port 8: in vlan 3 If you know how to do this would you please give me a hand? (Yes, I have read the (rather slim) documentation ...) Thank you, Pierre-Alex Message

RE: Outlets England [7:53864]

2002-10-08 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Great Britain Wiring I got to England after a long 15-hour trip ... On my arrival I immediately went to a Electric shop to buy British Power Cord. Those are relatively cheap about 2 pounds something each, but I needed 12 of those for my equipment. The lad other there was very kind, he to

RE: OT: Outlets England [7:53864]

2002-09-24 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
I was hoping to find an UPS or surge protector that would work with both US and UK, but after thinking, might be easier to find something when I get there. Thanks anyway. Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53939&t=53864 -

RE: Outlets England [7:53864]

2002-09-22 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Thanks! Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53868&t=53864 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PRO

OT: Outlets England [7:53864]

2002-09-22 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
I am moving to England next week (with my Cisco rack). Are the outlets in England the same shape as the US? Thanks, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53864&t=53864 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscriptio

RE: configuring catalyst 1200 [7:52319]

2002-08-29 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Tim, I have a Catalyst 1600 and I had the same problem. Here is the work around I used: 1) I attached a modem to the console 2 I dialed in 3) I assigning an IP address 3) I disconnected and connected to the switch via telnet Try this with your 1200 ... Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http:

Re: break via reverse telnet [7:51192]

2002-08-11 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
That's correct... If you want to use a different escape character use the command "escape-character" followed by the ASCII number Example: config t line vty 0 4 escape-character 1 where: 1=A 2=B 3=C etc... Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51216&

RE: Fwd: Re: BGP loop [7:51169]

2002-08-11 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Thanks Pete!!! I will spend more time reading the rfcs. Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51215&t=51169 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misc

RE: Fwd: Re: BGP loop [7:51169]

2002-08-11 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Hi Pete, Here is the reference for rule 2: You are only allowed to advertise your best path for a particular NLRI Internet Routing Architecture (Second Edition), Sam Halabi page 155 "The best routes, as identified by the decision process, are placed in the Loc-RIB. These routes become candidat

RE: Fwd: Re: BGP loop [7:51169]

2002-08-11 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Hey Pete, Thanks for the explaination. It does make sense now! There were two things I was not aware of: 1) Routers prefers the EBGP routes due to E vs I preference 2) You are only allowed to advertise your best path for a particular NLRI I went back to my books and tried to find references o

RE: BGP loop [7:51169]

2002-08-11 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Stuck! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51190&t=51169 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: BGP loop [7:51169]

2002-08-11 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
More supsense R3 sent an update but the message was that 172.16.0.0/16 is unreacheable. That should explain why R2 did not accept the update! R3# 1d11h: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.10.2.1 Down User reset 1d11h: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.10.3.1 Down User reset 1d12h: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE:

RE: BGP loop [7:51169]

2002-08-11 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
On my previous post I said that the problem was on R3. It could also have been on R2, if R2 rejected the update I used a debug on R2 to locate the problem. R3 did send the update but R2 rejected it. Please note the keyword "withdrawn" at the end of the output below: R2# 1d11h: %BGP-5-ADJCHAN

RE: BGP loop [7:51169]

2002-08-11 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Still thinking aloud: it seems that the problem is located at R3. When I do a "show bgp summary" on R2 it apppears that it did not receive any prefix from R3 NeighborVAS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd 10.10.1.2 4 10112771269200

RE: BGP loop [7:51169]

2002-08-11 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
When I cleared R2, not only did I NOT get the extra path but I lost the second path on R0. Here is R0 (after clearing R2) Network Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path *> 172.16.0.0 10.10.5.10 0 101 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy

RE: BGP loop [7:51169]

2002-08-11 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Everything I have read seems to indicate that R0 and R2 should have received 2 paths to the 172.16.0.0 network. I did a "clear ip bgp *" on R0. And I got the expected result: Network Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path * 172.16.0.0 10.10.4.1

RE: BGP loop [7:51169]

2002-08-11 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Responding to my second questions: "Is this to prevent loops?" Well, there is no loop here because neither R2 nor R0 would have received their local AS in the AS_PATH! Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51183&t=51169 --

BGP loop [7:51169]

2002-08-10 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
This is the network: AS101(R1) --- AS102 (R2) --- AS103 (R3)--- (R4)-AS100(R0) to AS101 (R1) (R3 and R4 are IBGP neighbors) I have route 172.16.0.0 on AS101 (R1) that is advertised via BGP. When i do a "show ip bgp", the only routers that have two paths to 172.16.0.0 are R3 and R4. R0 a

Re: Frame-Relay NNI -- [7:49849]

2002-07-27 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
I was not aware of this requirement. Thank you!!! Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49890&t=49849 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct

Frame-Relay NNI -- [7:49849]

2002-07-26 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
My frame-relay switch died, so I put 2 1700 routers back-to-back to get enough interfaces. I made sure to use the interface type "nni" between the two 1700, yet it looks like the two frame-relay switches are not talking to each other. Anyone try this trick before. This is what I get: frame2#sho

Bus Error [7:49592]

2002-07-24 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
I have had bus errors on my Cisco 4000 router. I ran a memory diagnostic on memory addresses 0x0004 to 0x067F which should have covered tests for DRAM lower location, boot EPROM, Flash EPROM, and DRAM upper location as well as Onboard ressources and system IO ( http://www.cisco.com/wa

Hardware Diagnostic - How to interpret [7:49431]

2002-07-23 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
I have had bus errors on my Cisco 4000 router. I ran a memory diagnostic on memory addresses 0x0004 to 0x067F which should have covered tests for DRAM lower location, boot EPROM, Flash EPROM, and DRAM upper location as well as Onboard ressources and system IO ( http://www.cisco.com/warp

RE: Voice of IP / Frame-Relay and remote labs [7:48947]

2002-07-17 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Manish, I think you have solved my problem ...Thanks also to Steven, Priscilla, Tangled up in Blue, Brad and Bernard; I will try your suggestions to. Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49031&t=48947 -- FAQ

RE: Voice of IP / Frame-Relay and remote labs [7:48947]

2002-07-16 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
That is good ... but does the fact that the modem ring and indication that I have a proper voice link? Could it be that if picked up the phones that I would not be able to hear anything from the other side? And could a simple debug demonstrate that I have a crystal clear voice connection on the ot

Voice of IP / Frame-Relay and remote labs [7:48947]

2002-07-16 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
I am about to start studying Voice topics for the CCIE lab How does one test that a call has actually been placed succesffuly when doing remote-labs? Or maybe this is not possible and you actually have to buy the gears to see the stuff working ... I bet you would neeed some type of robot to pic

Re: Benchmark CCIE [7:47320]

2002-06-25 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Don, I did not understand your post. Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47401&t=47320 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclo

Re: Benchmark CCIE [7:47320]

2002-06-25 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Understood ... THANKS Chuck!!! Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47395&t=47320 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure

RE: Benchmark CCIE [7:47320]

2002-06-25 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Thank you for the Tips Bernard. I will change my "bad" habits :) Just curious... When you configure your routers do you enter all the commands in global config mode, then interface mode, then router mode ? Or do you configure the routers according to the sequence in which the router operates (for

RE: Benchmark CCIE [7:47320]

2002-06-25 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Thanks for the landmark... With an extra more focus, today I was able to do a new case scenario: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/793/access_dial/bri_isdn_11048.html in exactly 15 minutes. That was pretty stressfull! Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&

RE: ISDN Gurus HElp! [7:47353]

2002-06-25 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Please send us the output of "show isdn status" on that router. Thanks, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47378&t=47353 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.

Benchmark CCIE [7:47320]

2002-06-24 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
How fast should a well prepared CCIE candidate take to setup the network below: (watch the wrap) http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/129/bri-backup-map-watch.html Right now I am taking 30 minutes. Is that too slow or about right right? Thanks, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupst

RE: ISDN DDR and Routing Protocols [7:47301]

2002-06-24 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
I don't know which IGP protocols you run on your network (if any)... so this is just a wild guess. If you were running RIP it could trigger the link ... (I would add: access-list 101 deny udp any any eq 520) If you were running OSPF (I would add: access-list 101 deny ospf any any) Pierre-A

Re: Lab comming Frakin' out here [7:47055]

2002-06-20 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
I know the feelling ... You said: " But what is really scaring me is the "Old" Stuff like Bridging, Token, IPX. " Then why not postpon your lab and take the lab after November. Apparently they are removing ipx and token ring? Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/re

RE: 5-4-3 rule segment definition for 10BaseT [7:46439]

2002-06-14 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Well here is a start: the 5-4-3 rule reffers to 5 segments 4 repeaters 3 populated segments Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46667&t=46439 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www

Re: ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496]

2002-06-14 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Ok, here are the result of my tests (cummulative) 1) I gave the loopbacks unique IP addresses and tested result: no change 2) I assigned isdn1 f0/0 to vlan11 and isdn f0/0 to vlan12 on isdn1 f0/0 ip address was 192.168.10.1/24 on isdn2 f0/0 ip address was 192.168.20.1/24 I left the default

Re: ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496]

2002-06-14 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Sorry Gaz, I did not mean to spoil to the suspense. I thought you meant the humbers 2065 1.1.1.1 were unlucky numbers. Something like :) That is why I asked you to explain if there was any cultural issues with my numbers ... Anyway,I am redoing the exercise right now with Fast Ethenernet In

Re: ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496]

2002-06-14 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Gaz, you are going to have to educate me on cultural issues ... What is wrong with those numbers ? (ip host isdn2 2065 1.1.1.1) Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46631&t=46496 -- FAQ, list archives,

RE: ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496]

2002-06-14 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
"You have default routes pointed towards one another. You ping an address that doesn't exist on either router. The first sends it off to the second. The second doesn't know what to do with it so sends it on to its default which is the first." I do agree with your statements ... However, what is t

RE: ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496]

2002-06-14 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
No I am not running any routing protocol! Here are my configs: isdn1 (router A) isdn1#show run Building configuration... Current configuration : 1166 bytes ! version 12.2 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname isdn1 ! enable secr

RE: ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496]

2002-06-14 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
>From router B, I pinged a boggus destination. This triggered the bri interface on router B. Here is the output of the "debug dialer events" from Router A. You can see that router A (for no apparent reason) is trying to call router B (even though it is router B who initiated the call.) Of course t

ISDN ....Challenging Problem! [7:46500]

2002-06-13 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Posted to Cisco Newsgroup at 3:30 on June 13, 2002 Router A and Router B are connected to an Atlas 550 via BRI interfaces Router A ATLAS --- ROUTER B Both router are configured with DDR Dialer maps so that Router A can call router B or vice-versa (basic stuff). When Router A is called by

ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496]

2002-06-13 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Router A and Router B are connected to an Atlas 550 via BRI interfaces Router A ATLAS --- ROUTER B Both router are configured with DDR Dialer maps so that Router A can call router B or vice-versa (basic stuff). When Router A is called by Router B, Router A answers normally and the link goe

RE: SNMP Management Using a Switch [7:46196]

2002-06-11 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Switches can do Layer 3 switching (hardware base routing) if they have a router module or a router switch feature card. Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 8:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

CCIE R&S vs CCIE Design [7:46173]

2002-06-09 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
A question to the current CCIE R&S and CCIE Design engineers. How much design do I need to learn for the CCIE R&S? Obviously not as much as the CCIE Design. But where do I draw the line? How much is too much, taking in consideration that I am planning to sit for the lab 9 to 12 months from now

Re: Frame-Relay - [7:46076]

2002-06-09 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Steven, thanks for the answer. I am still have questions ... Where do I find original documents on Frame-Relay? Thanks Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46172&t=46076 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscript

Frame-Relay - [7:46076]

2002-06-07 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Sorry for posting this again Please check my logic on this frame-relay traffic shaping scenario: My Bc is 8,000 bits My Be is 16,000 bits My CIR is 64 Kbps If I send 1 burst of 56,000 bits then 4 bursts of 4,000 bits, after the 4th burst of 4,000 bits I will be able to burst again but

RE: To much! [7:45865]

2002-06-06 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Try exercising... It does increase mental stamina. Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45965&t=45865 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct

Frame Relay Traffic Shaping - [7:45962]

2002-06-06 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Please check my logic: My Bc is 8,000 bits My Be is 16,000 bits My CIR is 64 Kbps If I send 1 burst of 56,000 bits then 4 bursts of 4,000 bits, after the 4th burst of 4,000 bits I will be able to burst again but not before that. Correct? Here is my rational (Assume no congestion in the frame-r

Re: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535]

2002-05-31 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
The IOS documentation has a section on QoS. Check CC0 Regarless of your method of preparation you need to take some test to check your understanding. Boson was a great help in that matter. Good luck on your exam. Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=

CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535]

2002-05-31 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
I took the CCIE written yesterday afternoon and passed (80%) I was expecting more, but I flunked the performance/QoS section of the exam, which I neglected somewhat during preparation. I used both Boson #1 and Boson #3. Those 2 tests are complementary and are NOT substitute for each other. Boso

RE: TCP IP Sequence numbers [7:45131]

2002-05-27 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TCP IP Sequence numbers [7:45131] At 07:37 AM 5/27/02, Pierre-Alex Guanel wrote: >I understand that when a host is sending an acknowledgement, it indicates to >the target the NEXT segment number that it expects to receive. It's kind of a picky thing, b

RE: Check My EIGRP Configuration [7:45065]

2002-05-27 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Best of luck to you! Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 2:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Check My EIGRP Configuration [7:45065] Dear Kris, Karago, Pierre-Alex, Chuck, Steven, Brian and everybody thanks

TCP IP Sequence numbers [7:45131]

2002-05-27 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
I understand that when a host is sending an acknowledgement, it indicates to the target the NEXT segment number that it expects to receive. When host A sends acknowledgement number X to host B, why does B sets its sequence number to X+1? I would expect B to set its sequence number to X, since X i

RE: ISDN-PRI-BRI [7:45083]

2002-05-26 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
This is is really cool! I was not aware of this. Thanks, Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steven A. Ridder Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 12:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ISDN-PRI-BRI [7:45083] Here's the links I hav

RE: ISDN-PRI-BRI [7:45083]

2002-05-26 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
You need the ISDN switch or switch simulator Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Juan Blanco Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 10:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ISDN-PRI-BRI [7:45083] Team, We have a 7200 with the following inter

RE: Check My EIGRP Configuration [7:45065]

2002-05-26 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Looks good ... I would also add a bandwidth statement on the serial interfaces to specify 64 Kbps This way the metric calculated by EIGRP will match your actual network bandwidth This would make a difference if your network became more complex ... Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From:

CCIE written Commands [7:44730]

2002-05-22 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Just curious Do I need to review all my routing and switching commands for the CCIE written? Boson #3 have no emphasis on commands but Boson #1 does. Thank you, Pierre-Alex P.S. I assume this question does not violate the NDA . Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f

RE: bit time [7:44144]

2002-05-14 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Thank you Remmert. Can I assume that with a 16 Mb Token ring a bit time would be 16 bits per seconds? Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of C restion Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 6:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: bit time [7

bit time [7:44144]

2002-05-14 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
I am looking for a good definition of "bit time" I found on a networking encyclopedia that "bit time is the same as bit rate i.e. the ratio of the number of bits transferred between devices in a specific amount of time, typically a second." I am not satisfied by this definition. For example in t

bit time [7:44142]

2002-05-14 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
I am looking for a good definition of "bit time" I found on a networking encyclopedia that "bit time is the same as bit rate i.e. the ratio of the number of bits transferred between devices in a specific amount of time, typically a second." I am not satisfied by this definition. For example in t

RE: All-In-One CCIE Study Guide - Second Edition [7:42292]

2002-04-24 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
confusion. Passed the written. Hurrah!! Very few BGP questions. Lot of TokenRing. You better learn the Rossi Paper! Good luck on yours. regards, Koen On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Pierre-Alex GUANEL wrote: | Koen, I was referring to the book written by Roosvelt GILES. | | By the way, how was the written? I

RE: All-In-One CCIE Study Guide - Second Edition [7:42292]

2002-04-23 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
To: Pierre-Alex GUANEL Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: All-In-One CCIE Study Guide - Second Edition [7:42292] Pierre, I am reading the second edition at the moment. Will go for the written tomorrow. Until so far I like the book very much, although it still contains errors. K. Koen Zeilstra

All-In-One CCIE Study Guide - Second Edition [7:42292]

2002-04-22 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
If the second edition of Giles' book a reliable study source. I read that the first edition was crippled with mistakes and I would like to know if all of them got fixed in the Second Edition. Thank you! Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42292&t=42

RE: TAC [7:42141]

2002-04-21 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
I called TAC this morning. I had no problem getting through. If you are in the US, the number is: 1 800 553 2447 Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steven A. Ridder Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 10:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] S

RE: TAC [7:42141]

2002-04-21 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 10:08 AM To: Pierre-Alex Guanel Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TAC [7:42141] In my experience, either side can close the case. I've had TAC close cases that were not even close to being resolved. I assume that there's some type

TAC [7:42141]

2002-04-21 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
You have worked with TAC on a case. The problem is resolved. Who will close the case? The TAC engineer or the customer Thanks, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42141&t=42141 -- FAQ, list archives, an

RE: output buffers swapped out [7:41986]

2002-04-19 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Answer to my own question: on 7500 routers when the "transmit-buffers backing-store" command is enabled and the transmit queue is full, packets are swapped from the MEMD into DRAM. If the command is not enabled (default) then packets are dropped. A high occurrence of "output buffers swapped out"

output buffers swapped out [7:41985]

2002-04-19 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
(resent) Can't find any explanation on CCO about "output buffers swapped out" (Ethernet interface) Any one has a definition of what it is and what could cause 146399903 "output buffers swapped out" on an Ethernet interface? thank you, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.c

RE: Token Ring Errors - Simulating [7:41497]

2002-04-19 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
riginal Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pierre-Alex Guanel Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 8:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Token Ring Errors - Simulating [7:41497] Do you know tool(s) that can generate Bad Token ring frames, duplicate tokens, etc... ?

RE: US Robotics modem to Cisco 2514 [7:41894]

2002-04-18 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
If you remove the "modem autoconfigure ..." as Mark suggested, then you will need a modem chat script. "modem autoconfigure ..." will work fine on an US Robotics Sposter with pin 3 and 8 down You should reverse telnet to the modem and type "at&F" and enter. Then you type "ati4" and enter (even

Token Ring Errors - Simulating [7:41497]

2002-04-15 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Do you know tool(s) that can generate Bad Token ring frames, duplicate tokens, etc... ? I would like to check my Token Ring troubleshooting skills. thank you! Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41497&t=41497 -

Cisco Market Place [7:41336]

2002-04-12 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Do you have to be a Cisco reseller to order directly from Cisco Market Place? In the Networking Products Market Place homepage, when I use the Internet Commerce Agreement Link (ICA), it asks me to select a region; then get the message: "Your Cisco.com user profile does not contain the necessary I

RE: TACACS+ [7:41103]

2002-04-10 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
I have read the documentation for ACS v2.6 I went to IOS commands (under group) in the IOS Commands sections I am getting error message whenever I enter something in the "command" and "argument" window. (for example: configure terminal gives me the error "exec terminal:incorrect format" Any id

TACACS+ [7:41095]

2002-04-10 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
I am using Cisco Secure ACS v2.6 I can't find the location in the software where I can set the commands users can use (Authorization). Can you give me a hint? thank you, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41095&t=41095 -

CCIE written / Lab ... partner [7:40781]

2002-04-07 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
Anyone in Warsaw (Poland), preparing for the CCIE written / Lab? Please contact me of line. Thank you, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40781&t=40781 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: htt

Best place to prepare for CCIE? [7:40362]

2002-04-03 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
I lost my job in the US and I have to relocate. Which country would you go to? thanks Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40362&t=40362 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupst

RE: Logging - terminal monitor not working [7:39957]

2002-03-31 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
# Version Found12.0(7)T 12.0(6)S Fixed-in Version12.2(5) > > ## Release Notes > > ## > > ## The logging synchronous line configuration command may > > ## cause logging to stop. > > ## > > ## Workaround: Remove this command. hth Reinhold Pierre-Alex Guanel

RE: Logging - terminal monitor not working [7:39957]

2002-03-30 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Lidiya White -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pierre-Alex Guanel Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 3:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Logging - terminal monitor not working [7:39957] Kind of a silly problem but can't figure it out ...

Logging - terminal monitor not working [7:39957]

2002-03-30 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Kind of a silly problem but can't figure it out ... I am connected to R1 via telnet. I have turned on debugging of ip packets I also have issued the command "terminal monitor" Yet I do not get anything logged when I ping the Ethernet interface of R1 Any ideas? Thanks

RE: MAU 8228 [7:39892]

2002-03-29 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
-Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex GUANEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 9:22 AM To: Cisco Subject: MAU 8228 Has anyone used the IBM 8228 Token Ring MAU with Cisco routers? Do you recommend the product? Thank you, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http

MAU 8228 [7:39891]

2002-03-29 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
Has anyone used the IBM 8228 Token Ring MAU with Cisco routers? Do you recommend the product? Thank you, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39891&t=39891 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: h

Sybex CCNP Lab [7:39527]

2002-03-26 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Hi, I have a few questions regarding Sybex CCNP Virtual Lab. SWITCHING: GENERAL INFO: a) How many Catalyst 5000 switches can you configure in the software? b) If more than 1, can you create a dual core with layer 2 / layer 3? c) What is the supervisor revision number? d) What software relea

RE: BGP Issue... [7:38877]

2002-03-19 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
The routers can be logically connected. However, to my knowledge, the best practice is that they are directly connected. Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stanzin Takpa Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 5:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

FW: Route-map - Boson - incorrect? [7:38554]

2002-03-16 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
-Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex GUANEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 1:55 PM To: Cisco Subject: Route-map - Boson - incorrect? Here are two statements from BOSON and their associated answers: "When a Match is made, the Route Map can change the

Route-map - Boson - incorrect? [7:38553]

2002-03-16 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
Here are two statements from BOSON and their associated answers: "When a Match is made, the Route Map can change the route with the map-tag command (TRUE)" "When a Match is made, the Route Map will change the route with the set command. (FALSE)" (1) is there such a thing as a map-tag command.

RE: CCNP exams [7:38097]

2002-03-13 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Just to make sure: Student A passed is CCNP last week. His certification is valid for 3 years, regardless of changes in the content of the exams or the certification. Correct? Thank you, Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ladr

RE: Well it's my turn...CCIE#8878 [7:37145]

2002-03-04 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Congratulations! Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard Newman Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Well it's my turn...CCIE#8878 [7:37145] With many hours of reading and hands on, not to ment

RE: VLSM and CIDR [7:37031]

2002-03-01 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
ot a problem with > OSPF. > > > > I have not tried with either IS-IS or Ripv2, but again, why not? > > > > there may be issues with older IOS code. Some vendor older models may not > > support it. But I have no reason based on my experience, to believe that > it

RE: VLSM and CIDR [7:37031]

2002-03-01 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
uot; > > I also know from long lab rat experience that it is not a problem with OSPF. > > I have not tried with either IS-IS or Ripv2, but again, why not? > > there may be issues with older IOS code. Some vendor older models may not > support it. But I have no reason based on

RE: VLSM and CIDR [7:37031]

2002-03-01 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
The statement that provoked my question is from RFC 1721. They say "Subnet masks are also necessary for implementation of "classless" addressing, as the CIDR work proposes" thus the question "if a routing protocol supports subnet mask does that automatically mean that it can do CIDR? ( I think

VLSM and CIDR [7:37031]

2002-03-01 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
If a routing protocol can do VLSM does that automatically mean that it can also do CIDR? Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37031&t=37031 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy

RE: Spanning tree Protocol Questions [7:36559]

2002-02-27 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
OK it's clear now! I got the credit card out. Will buy the book online, tonight after class!!! Thanks again, Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 4:52 PM To: 'Pierre-Alex Guanel'; [EMAIL PROTECT

RE: Spanning tree Protocol Questions [7:36559]

2002-02-27 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Yes that is what I concluded There is only 1 thing ... doesn't switch 3 send BPDUs as soon as it enter Listening mode? Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 4:40 PM To: 'Pierre-Alex Guanel'

  1   2   >