I'll be there. Looking forward to it.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Mossburg, Geoff (MAN-Corporate) wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know Robert McCallum already asked this, but who is going to Networkers
in
Orlando next week? Any cool GroupStudy router config parties gonna happen?
:-)
I believe it's just a new activation key.
Copied from Cisco's website:
There are a couple of reasons that you may need to upgrade the activation
key on your PIX.
a.. Your PIX does not currently have VPN-DES or VPN-3DES encryption
enabled.
Note: VPN-DES encryption must be enabled for you to
CiscoWorks VMS 2.1
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Curious wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have setup Site to Site VPN between our corporate PIX 515 and our
developers PIX 501, i want to moniter the VPN traffic of these Site to
Site
VPN connections.
Please tell me
Just so I understand (crypto is a tough subject for me), if one knows the
length of a packet before crypto processing, it becomes a weakness
because(fill in the blank).
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
At 12:03 AM + 1/13/03
Thanks! I was just curious. What about L2 headers in Frame Relay
Fragmentation (frf.12)?
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Steven A. Ridder wrote:
Does anyone know if a packet is fragmented, that the specific
values in a
I agree with Matt. The PIX 515 introduces jitter. Not sure what the Cisco
IPT Safe document is talking about.
Matt Hill wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Good luck..
However you will get latency and jitter issues during the time the PIXs
encrypt/decrypt the
Does anyone know if a packet is fragmented, that the specific values in a
field are replicated across all headers of the fragmented packets, or just
the first one?
Meaning, if I have a packet that has IP Prec 5, and a router along the way
has to fragment the packet, would it be so kind as to put
Supposedly by end of the month. Docs and stuff are slowly trickling out,
but noting good yet.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
supernet wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Several months ago, Cisco TAC told me that CallManager 3.3 would be
released in Nov. this year. Is it
was your problem split horizon?
The Long and Winding Road wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
In the words of the esteemed Maxwell Smart, missed it by that much.
Good test. Liked it a lot. Can't say much about the content, obviously.
The 3550's were there. I
I say DSL has no multi-service (or very limited) capabilities. There
isn't much in terms of QoS, LFI or other voice/video tools. Plus there is
no QoS across the DSL network (if over Internet) and no standard nation-wide
(no National provider).
If you say, there is no voice going across network,
I'd focus on Avvid technologies, centraly managed security and storage
solutions across nation-wide networks and public Internet (Cisco Works/ACS),
and on-line collaboration tools using open standards like LDAP, X.509,
h.323/SIP, etc.
That is where Enterprises are moving.
Priscilla Oppenheimer
You are correct. I read it too quickly.
William Lijewski wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hello,
The default for the maximum number of mac-addresses is one, and the
default
violation is shutdown.
Bill
Message Posted at:
Don't worry about the IP address. The command you had was correct. Why do
you ask?
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
MK wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
How can I configure PortSecurity based on MAc-Address and
IP-Address. I only know about switchport port-security
]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Because there must be a way, and I was asked about it in our
Company. I know there is some secret behind !
-Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Im Auftrag von
Steven A. Ridder
Gesendet: Samstag, 30. Novem
MK wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Because there must be a way, and I was asked about it in our
Company. I know there is some secret behind !
-Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Im Auftrag von
Steven A
I heard from Wendel Odom himself that he is coming out with a Cisco-press
QoS book for the Exam, so I'd wait for that. I thought I heard December.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
dre wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Cisco Nuts wrote in message
[EMAIL
Just use the MOS charts alread yout there and not worry about it. Why
reinvent the wheel?
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
neil K. wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Guys,
VoIP Testing, do you go by MOS or PQSM. I mean when testing VoIP will
perform on a network before
ping a multicast address.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
H wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have just started to study for Multicast, and I am wondering whether
there
is any simulator / programs that can simulate Multicast traffic. Also,
can
I use a Cisco router to
no. don't waste your time.
Ahed Naimi wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Dear All;
Is there any way to block MSN Messenger by using the access-list
statements
on an IOS Cisco router.
Thanks All.
Message Posted at:
I lost it. Could you post it please?
thanks
Steve
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Thanks. I have the information.
At 1:37 AM + 11/18/02, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
I confess to having download problems with a couple of recent
It looks like the options in the packets do not march. Any way to get a
sniffer on there to see what each is sending as options. It could also be a
priority issue if the network is a broadcast/nbma network where neither is
being elected a DR? Finally, could a checksum be bad?
--
RFC 1149
I'd recommend knowing QoS in and out for the new lab format, as those are
topics I think Cisco wants you to understand. As people have been saying
for a while, they took out TR and IPX, but they have to replace it with
something.
Cisco Nuts wrote in message
I've been studying too hard, because I thought this was a REGEX question.
Greg Nathan wrote in message
news:200211051415.OAB12451;groupstudy.com...
Hello fellow ciscoites
The question should include vat because that is is what cisco charge for
the
lab, 1500$.
CCIE topics are well covered by
I think they may focus on QoS stuff, but we'll see (I'll be prepared for
everything) as I'm taking the new test this Friday.
I know that they'll have 2 Cat 3550's from what they said in the summer, so
I guess trunking, etherchannel and other things like you mention, VLAN
tunneling may pop up as
We in the Cisco world are just entering the SAN arena, but it isn't new
technology. The only new thing will be iSCSI. My company is HP and EMC's
largest reseller, so we have been doing this stuff for a while, but it's
brand new to me. I have been picking everyone's brains the past few months
to
THe trick is to see if you can do it in 1 access-list statement. I think it
can be done in 1.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
J B wrote in message
news:200210252026.UAA12924;groupstudy.com...
Thanks for the Help
JB
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56364t=56313
without looking at the lab, try summary address at the (or all) ospf asbr's.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Edward Sohn wrote in message
news:200210260007.AAA12983;groupstudy.com...
I'm working on Solie's skynet lab...
If one router (R2) redistributes summarized EIGRP routes (from R5) into
OSPF
I'm gone for a week, and already I'm being attacked :)
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
The Long and Winding Road wrote in
message news:200210251844.SAA20015;groupstudy.com...
Someone a lot smarter than I did the intelligent work - i.e. the call plan
and the server configuration. I was one of the
I agree that the phone deployment process is monkey work and could be subbed
out for dirt cheap $$, just as long as the unions don't get their hands on
it as they do in the real voice world.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
The Long and Winding Road wrote in
message
what is the bootflash setting?
Price, Jeffery (TIFPC) wrote in message
news:200210181305.NAA26473;groupstudy.com...
All,
I am hoping that you can help shed some light on a problem we had early
this
morning. We lost power to our data center and when the power came back on
our 3 core 6509
NO.
Thomas Crowe wrote in message
news:200210171509.PAA16135;groupstudy.com...
I remember a while back I had the question of which terminal emulator is
being used for the CCIE lab. Well after taking the Lab (and yes I was
honored with an invitation to come back and try again one day soon
Not sure I understand how you are running your network, but if you deny the
lawyers VLAN from accessing the other VLAN's in your network, you should be
all set. That way you only have one deny statement to add to each VLAN. I
think what's throwing me is the 300 line access-list statement.
it is intended for?
I'm
still trying to find good information on it.
Steven A. Ridder wrote in message
news:200210181920.TAA12300;groupstudy.com...
Not sure I understand how you are running your network, but if you deny
the
lawyers VLAN from accessing the other VLAN's in your network, you should
This was Cisco's old theory. In theory, it would work, but in reality, if
the frame switch saw a packet come into it's ingress interface with the
packet already marked DE, it will drop it because it was unexpected.
I asked the telco's your question last year and that's the answer they gave
me.
ONe place is the corporate directory, which is usually in the DC direcrotry.
YOu get that by clicking on the directory button. Is that what you are
talking about, or are you talking about personal directory, or the AD
plugin, or the Exchange PAB plug-in?
If it's what I think it is, the Active
I think you have to be an NTP server, as I don't think a workstation can
peer with you.
wrote in message
news:200210172226.WAA27043;groupstudy.com...
Hi,
I am trying to configure my NTP server on the cisco 7505 router.
The configuration which I did is as follows:
router#ntp master 10
The CM uses the MAC as a unique identifier in it's SQL database. It's
actually a distorted version of the MAC, such as a phone's identifier -
SEP003094C26105
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Great answer. Finally an
identifiers.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Steven A. Ridder wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
The CM uses the MAC as a unique identifier in it's SQL database. It's
actually a distorted version of the MAC, such as a phone's identifier -
SEP003094C26105
--
is not the devleopment of bandwidth over their
networks, but the 2.5G network development, and the standardization of the
network with 1 common signal.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
The Long and Winding Road wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Steven A. Ridde
I understand the technology and stand by whoever said what IP telephony/VoIP
isn't a bandwidth hungry app. It isn't. G.729, which can use as little as
8k with proper compresion, has nearly the same MOS score as G.711, which is
toll quality. Even though it's not officially toll quality I
LLQ would be his best option, not WFQ. If he is using it, that's probably
his issue.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
lamb stephen wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Group,
Hoping that someone can help me out with a VoIP QoS issue that I am
currently dealing with. I
I think the aggregate address has to be in your routing table first.
Someone please correct me if i'm wrong, as I'm trying to get it right from
memory.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Cisco Nuts wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hello,
Does the suppress-map work along
THe only reason I can see using QoS is to limit traffic to certain amouts of
BW. Even then it's tricky becasuse in CBWFQ, you are guaranteing a minimum,
not a maximum amout of BW for a class. You could police certain classes of
traffic to never exceed a BW, but that can be crummy as well,
I think you need to look at analog/digital gateways, and how they interact
with a trunk connection on the different systems. At least thats how you
tackle the problem from the cisco side. Or maybe the other VoIP solutions
are H.323 compliant, and maybe you can get lucky and try that approach.
calls are circuit-switched across ATM now. Now if
someone could just solve the last mile
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
The Long and Winding Road wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Steven A. Ridder wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL P
I remeber what that emergency network is: GETS.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Steven A. Ridder wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I always thought that the PSTN was based off of that fact that not all
phones would be calling at once, and if they did, then so
In cisco terms, mincir is the cir, and cir is the port speed.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
neil K. wrote in message
news:200210112334.XAA14349;groupstudy.com...
Hi Group,
Can someone please explain to me the difference between cir and mincir.Any
help is highly appreciated.
Regards,
neil
I don't think its possible to filter NetBIOS domain lists specifically, but
you can filter UDP 135, 137-139, which should cover it. Still not sure how
you are receiving rouge domains inside your network, though, as it could be
somthing else that is causing the domain lists to bleed in, such as
per destination. Especially if you are dual homed, and NAT two different IP
blocks, then the per packet load balancing would be a disaster.
Jarmoc, Jeff wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
When using CEF on a border internet router with a NAT device behind it, is
If the analog flavor, 1 call per port. But I think you can do emulated EM
on a PRI so would be 23 (one per channel). EM is just a supervisory
signaling protocol, doesn't control the number of calls across the line.
Ismail M Saeed wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
There is a command printer under global config that allows you to send
jobs to a printer. I just looked it up and you need to understand the LPD
Unix command to understand printer on a router.
Robert Edmonds wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Copy it to a text
It can put a temp acl in place or do a TCP rst. Be careful when deploying
either though.
Bruno Fernandes wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi !!!
In the case a sensor detects a match in one of its signatures is it
possible for this sensor to shutdown a router
e survey!
Steven A. Ridder wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Yes we have settled the question. Most PBX's will probably use analog
EM
if small, or Digital PRI/QSIG if larger.
CL: or you plug a router FXO port into a PBX analogue port, correct? same
as
Not sure I saw any new certifications, just a new org. to certify
Chuck's Long Road wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Check this out
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/fcpa.html
AND
http://www.fieldcertification.org
AND
e survey!
Steven A. Ridder wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Not sure I saw any new certifications, just a new org. to certify
Chuck's Long Road wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Check this out
http://www.c
Were all the servers on the same card and CEF on? I had issues with that,
so we re-engineered the traffic to keep as much as possible on individual
cards, as the bus on the 4006 is only 2GB, as opposed to the 64 the
marketing department claims.
Erick B. wrote in message
[EMAIL
I'd just use MRTG, and cut and paste the files into a Power Point slide or
2. Plus some numbers with the pictures. That should suffice for both of
you.
Moises Luy wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Sorry, I don't have a report. Just in case, you might want to
You can use dialer-load threshold for incoming traffic as well.
Christopher Dumais wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hello all,
I have an ISDN line set up for vendor support. It is dedicated to one
vendor. They are always the one to initiate the call, their
When you combine the switches via gigastack, you are usually doing it
because you can't afford a chassis based switch in the closet (or don't need
one). If you do gigastack the switches, they are treated as separate hops
in spanning tree. I guess it's cheaper to run small gigastack cables then
Yes we have settled the question. Most PBX's will probably use analog EM
if small, or Digital PRI/QSIG if larger.
You can run an IP phone off of a router with ITS or SRST, but I probably
shouldn't be telling you that without the caveat that you need a license for
either service. Contact your
I'd preface it with it depends on the traffic going across the VLAN's. I've
seen 3600's get killed (actually die) with NFS traffic crossing an ethernet
port via inter-vlan traffic. A 1750 can only handle so much pps.
Chris Headings wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL
that's the best command to show the output
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Chuck's Long Road wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Chuck's Long Road wrote:
I'm putting in some rack
suggest...
TIA
--- Steven A. Ridder wrote:
I agree that SIP is the future, it just isn't there
yet. There is some SIP
being built into Unity and CM, but until everything
is SIP (as opposed to
MGCP/H.323 and Skinny), it just isn't useful yet.
I know that SIP is being deployed in SP
Is it me, or is no-sync the default in BGP in 12.2.11T?
--
RFC 1149 Compliant
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=53920t=53920
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
h.323 is more robust, but more complicated (both to develop for and learn).
SIP is new and easy, but useless right now. There's more security in h,323
right now.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Gunjan Mathur wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi,
Is Cisco 2600 series
I agree that SIP is the future, it just isn't there yet. There is some SIP
being built into Unity and CM, but until everything is SIP (as opposed to
MGCP/H.323 and Skinny), it just isn't useful yet.
I know that SIP is being deployed in SP networks, and I have implemented it
in a Telco, but for
I have to imagine a 1548 is quiet.
Charlie Wehner wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I'm looking to buy a switch for my apartment. (Right now, the 2950T
24port
10/100/1000Base-T looks promising.)
However, the amount of noise this thing produces is a concern. I
you can do priority dlci's and you can apply class maps to map classes I
think.
dayo olabisi wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi listers,
I want to do some form of queueing on sub-interfaces
on some of my routers. Each subif maps to a frame
dlci.
does any
no, not that I have ever heard of.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
John Wright wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi guys,
Just found this group and it looks like a great resource for Cisco
certification misc. questions. I'm CCNP and have passed CCIE written.
My
the router handles signaling.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Tom Scott wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Having asked about VoMPLS transcoding from analog voice to MPLS
frames without intermediate IP packets, my lab partner noticed
that the CVOICE book (edited by
I believe IGRP is still proprietary.
From the IETF page:
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/IPR/igrp
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
hktco wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
When I learned my CCNA and CCNP, I read that IGRP is Cisco
proprietary. Recently I was told that IGRP
I believe that it's the same.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
JohnZ wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Can I use access-list to produce the same effect as prefix-list ? Any
thoughts on which is a better way to use in redistribution over other. I
am
just trying to find
I don't think much has changed from the old days. I know there's a ton of
new h.323 features, but those aren't in CVOICE. And most aren't used in
simple networks. The VoFR stuff will probably go away.
SIP's the new thing, but not there yet
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Priscilla Oppenheimer
tells isdn card at what point to bring up second channel.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
hagedorn wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hy can someone exlpain me for what the load-interval in isdn is.
any comments are welcome.
Regards Philipp
Message Posted at:
That line is the reason, but it got cut off. Resend the entire line.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
FAhmed wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi all
I ve got a problem
The user is getting disconnect after 2-3 minutes, I ve changed the
line at both side,
Doesn't
so far so good. I installed one for a client, and it worked awesome. I
even dropped it 10 feet, and it still worked!
Brian Wilkins wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I was wondering if anyone else has been experiencing problems with Cisco's
IDS sensor appliance
sh ip int
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
YASSER ALY wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi All, Is there a way to verify that no ip directed-broadcast is
enabled on an interface.I was trying to enable it on a router but typing
the command and then doing sh run
dialer-load threshold 1either
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Eng. ABDALLAH QUQAS wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Dear ALL,
how i can make ISDN BRI to connect at 128kbps instead of 64kbps as a
bundle
channel of Cisco router 3600 using ppp encapsulation.
Kind
Larry hit it right on the head. WFQ is a poor choice for voice, and you'll
probably notice a huge difference when moving to LLQ.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Roberts, Larry wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have 6 sites that have active queuing for VoIP traffic on
h.323 can do it with RAI, or you could use SA Agents. THose are your two
best options.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Jake wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Is there a way to tell a router (3810) , which is running voip, to reroute
a
voip call if the destination router
Is there an IDS signature that can help you recognize it on the PIX? That
maybe the easiest way to do it.
Richard Tufaro wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hey all, maybe silly question, but how do I log who is port scanning me?
Iv
got the logging on my PIX to
Speaking of stateful PIX's, if I make a change on 1 PIX, and it has failover
on, will it automatically make a change on the other PIX?
Gaz wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
In article , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
Hi,
In a Stataful configuration, and two PIX
I never had a cisco engineer ask if we were silver or up. Just call your SE
and schedule some lab time, that's how it works in MA. The only requirement
is you have to have passed the CCIE written.
cebuano wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I believe this is only
H.323 gatekeepers are the grand dial-plan for CM.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth) wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On Nov 28, 1:50pm, Chris Charlebois wrote:
}
} And Chuck is right, dial plans are not shared between clusters within
the
} software, so a Grand
Sup 3 is IOS based, Sup 2 is CatOS based. Sup 3 is new, and may not have
all the features you desire right away.
I think Sup 1 is L2 only.
Stuart Pittwood wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
We're looking into replacing some of our old hubs/switches with a single
I don't think so. I have never seen any of those requirements in the
blueprint or anywhere else.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Cisco Nuts wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hello,
Does anyone know if IPSec or CBAC or TCP intercept topics are REQUIRED for
the RS Lab?
I'm not sure there are any certified HP servers for CM. Last I checked,
there weren't.
Brian Zeitz wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Yea, I think there is 2 different versions, Compaq and HP. I think you
need to pick the version up front. I have Compaq DL380s and
CBWFQ should work. You can guarantee a minimum that each class of traffic
will receive during times of congestion.
DW wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Can anyone help,
I am setting up a WAN link between two sites that will be running Citrix.
There will be
oc192.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
bergenpeak wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Suppose you have a network with a mix of FE, GE, OC-3/12/48 POS
links.
With the standard OSPF link costing mechanism, all of these links
turn out to have a link cost of 1.
Are there
I haven't been keeping up with NBAR, but they may have some pdm's to block
the streaming audio apps.
NBAR was built for stuff like that, but I don't feel there's a need to block
this type of stuff. Same with IM. Let the users have some use of their PC
and increase productivity.
Spencer
CBWFQ is easier to configure and the default q is a WFQ.
Jay Greenberg wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Can anyone please explain the difference between CBWFQ and CQ? It seems
to me that they both allow you to class traffic in a custom manner, so
whats the main difference?
Jay
PDM. It's just too easy. Or use CiscoWorks VMS or CSPM to manage a bunch
of them.
I can't stand the cli and it's archaic language. I'd rather make sure my FW
is easy to configure so I don't miss anything. If something is too
complicated, you don't even know if you have problems because you
There are a lot of Cisco Powered networks doing QoS, but more for
multi-service type stuff for voice and video.
If you look on Cisco's web-site, there's a whole program your ISP can join
to become Cisco-powered in multiservice, although I don't know the exact
search terms you'd need to find it.
e
paying
for bandwidth then that is a consideration.
Just my $0.02.
Duncan
-Original Message-
From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 10:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: access-list for steaming audio [7:49817]
I haven't been ke
Does anyone know what type of traffic a typical Polycom Video Con. unit
creates? It it multicast? What ports does it use? Is it standard h.323?
I can sniff it, but if anyone has already done their homework on it, it will
save me some time.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Message Posted at:
hey
use? If you have a fairly utilized pipe or (like most companies) are
paying
for bandwidth then that is a consideration.
Just my $0.02.
Duncan
-Original Message-
From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 10:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sub
02-07-27 at 10:59, Steven A. Ridder wrote:
CBWFQ is easier to configure and the default q is a WFQ.
Jay Greenberg wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Can anyone please explain the difference between CBWFQ and CQ? It
seems
to me that they both allow you to class traffic in
ork, all
other routes are being announced anyway?
Steven A. Ridder wrote:
on the interface to the rest of the routers, do a ip eigrp
summary address
00.0.00 0.0.0.0
or
IP default network xx.x.x.
JohnZ wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
re being announced anyway?
Steven A. Ridder wrote:
on the interface to the rest of the routers, do a ip eigrp
summary address
00.0.00 0.0.0.0
or
IP default network xx.x.x.
JohnZ wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have a 3640 as
VoIP or Call Manager/IP Tel?
If I had to take a class, I guess it would be CVOICE, although I've never
taken it. I've read the book, and I'd recommend that.
I would also recommend a QoS class. That may be the most useful, and there
aren't a ton of good books to help understand that.
my $0.02
1 - 100 of 752 matches
Mail list logo
