RE: Voice Over Internet [7:61467]

servers. Clients are Windows 2000 Professional workstations. Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61469t=61467 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report

Please check my logic: ospf / frame-relay / broadcast [7:60715]

IETF ip ospf priority 0 ip policy route-map 10 serial restart-delay 0 frame-relay map ip 10.10.1.1 501 frame-relay lmi-type ansi end Thank you, Pierre-Alex Guanel Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60715t=60715

OT: CCIE LAB Study partner - UK [7:60116]

partner with ATM, Catalyst 3550 switches and Voice Equipment or someone willing to share the expense of buying those gears. Please contact me off-line if you are interested. My lab is scheduled for October 29 2003. Thank you, Pierre-Alex Guanel tel +44 (0)1695 725408 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message

Catalyst 1600 Token Ring Report - [7:56671]

-software-archived.asp Once on the page above, you want to download from the link: Smart Ringswitch Software R4.3 - Dec 00 (for RS Plus and RS Express only) When you open the download, the software will install automatically. The rest is obvious Pierre-Alex NB. This switch run the same code

O.T: CCIE Lab Partner - England. [7:56378]

Anyone studying for their CCIE LAB in the Manchester / Liverpool area? I have gears books. Let's talk offline: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56378t=56378 -- FAQ, list

BGP Best Path Algorithm -- Trick [7:56356]

any path learned through over means. So what is the rational for this step? I bet it is used in some trick configuration and I admit I have run out of imagination... Any hint would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i

RE: BGP Best Path Algorithm -- Trick [7:56356]

... Any hint would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56361t=56356 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct

Catalyst 1600 - Token Ring VLAN [7:56185]

I am trying to do this on a Catalyst 1600: port 1, port 2, port 3: in vlan 1 port 4, port 5, port 6: in vlan 2 port 7 and port 8: in vlan 3 If you know how to do this would you please give me a hand? (Yes, I have read the (rather slim) documentation ...) Thank you, Pierre-Alex Message

RE: Outlets England [7:53864]

for the plugs + 48 pounds for the surge protectors (less than $100) ... Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55087t=53864 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report

RE: OT: Outlets England [7:53864]

I was hoping to find an UPS or surge protector that would work with both US and UK, but after thinking, might be easier to find something when I get there. Thanks anyway. Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=53939t=53864

OT: Outlets England [7:53864]

I am moving to England next week (with my Cisco rack). Are the outlets in England the same shape as the US? Thanks, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=53864t=53864 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription

RE: Outlets England [7:53864]

Thanks! Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=53868t=53864 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL

RE: configuring catalyst 1200 [7:52319]

Tim, I have a Catalyst 1600 and I had the same problem. Here is the work around I used: 1) I attached a modem to the console 2 I dialed in 3) I assigning an IP address 3) I disconnected and connected to the switch via telnet Try this with your 1200 ... Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http

RE: BGP loop [7:51169]

Responding to my second questions: Is this to prevent loops? Well, there is no loop here because neither R2 nor R0 would have received their local AS in the AS_PATH! Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51183t=51169

RE: BGP loop [7:51169]

Everything I have read seems to indicate that R0 and R2 should have received 2 paths to the 172.16.0.0 network. I did a clear ip bgp * on R0. And I got the expected result: Network Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path * 172.16.0.0 10.10.4.1

RE: BGP loop [7:51169]

When I cleared R2, not only did I NOT get the extra path but I lost the second path on R0. Here is R0 (after clearing R2) Network Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path * 172.16.0.0 10.10.5.10 0 101 Message Posted at:

RE: BGP loop [7:51169]

Still thinking aloud: it seems that the problem is located at R3. When I do a show bgp summary on R2 it apppears that it did not receive any prefix from R3 NeighborVAS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd 10.10.1.2 4 10112771269200

RE: BGP loop [7:51169]

On my previous post I said that the problem was on R3. It could also have been on R2, if R2 rejected the update I used a debug on R2 to locate the problem. R3 did send the update but R2 rejected it. Please note the keyword withdrawn at the end of the output below: R2# 1d11h:

RE: BGP loop [7:51169]

More supsense R3 sent an update but the message was that 172.16.0.0/16 is unreacheable. That should explain why R2 did not accept the update! R3# 1d11h: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.10.2.1 Down User reset 1d11h: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.10.3.1 Down User reset 1d12h:

RE: BGP loop [7:51169]

Stuck! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51190t=51169 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Fwd: Re: BGP loop [7:51169]

of rules out there that precede the rules above ... Where did you learn about those? Are they published some place? Thanks, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51202t=51169 -- FAQ, list archives

RE: Fwd: Re: BGP loop [7:51169]

candidates that can be advertised to other peers or placed in the IP routing table. If a route is not placed int he Loc-RIB, it cannot be placed in the Adj-RIB-Out for advertisement to peers Still looking for a reference to Rule 1 Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form

RE: Fwd: Re: BGP loop [7:51169]

Thanks Pete!!! I will spend more time reading the rfcs. Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51215t=51169 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report

Re: break via reverse telnet [7:51192]

That's correct... If you want to use a different escape character use the command escape-character followed by the ASCII number Example: config t line vty 0 4 escape-character 1 where: 1=A 2=B 3=C etc... Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51216t

BGP loop [7:51169]

This is the network: AS101(R1) --- AS102 (R2) --- AS103 (R3)--- (R4)-AS100(R0) to AS101 (R1) (R3 and R4 are IBGP neighbors) I have route 172.16.0.0 on AS101 (R1) that is advertised via BGP. When i do a show ip bgp, the only routers that have two paths to 172.16.0.0 are R3 and R4. R0

Re: Frame-Relay NNI -- [7:49849]

I was not aware of this requirement. Thank you!!! Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49890t=49849 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct

Frame-Relay NNI -- [7:49849]

My frame-relay switch died, so I put 2 1700 routers back-to-back to get enough interfaces. I made sure to use the interface type nni between the two 1700, yet it looks like the two frame-relay switches are not talking to each other. Anyone try this trick before. This is what I get: frame2#show

Bus Error [7:49592]

I have had bus errors on my Cisco 4000 router. I ran a memory diagnostic on memory addresses 0x0004 to 0x067F which should have covered tests for DRAM lower location, boot EPROM, Flash EPROM, and DRAM upper location as well as Onboard ressources and system IO (

Hardware Diagnostic - How to interpret [7:49431]

I have had bus errors on my Cisco 4000 router. I ran a memory diagnostic on memory addresses 0x0004 to 0x067F which should have covered tests for DRAM lower location, boot EPROM, Flash EPROM, and DRAM upper location as well as Onboard ressources and system IO (

RE: Voice of IP / Frame-Relay and remote labs [7:48947]

Manish, I think you have solved my problem ...Thanks also to Steven, Priscilla, Tangled up in Blue, Brad and Bernard; I will try your suggestions to. Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49031t=48947 -- FAQ

Voice of IP / Frame-Relay and remote labs [7:48947]

to pickup the phone (just kidding). Thanks, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48947t=48947 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct

RE: Voice of IP / Frame-Relay and remote labs [7:48947]

on the other side with no echos, etc Seems to me that I would be missing quite a lot in doing a voice lab other the Internet. Are my assumptions correct? Or am I just paranoid ... Thank you, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48961t=48947

RE: ISDN Gurus HElp! [7:47353]

Please send us the output of show isdn status on that router. Thanks, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47378t=47353 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list

RE: Benchmark CCIE [7:47320]

Thanks for the landmark... With an extra more focus, today I was able to do a new case scenario: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/793/access_dial/bri_isdn_11048.html in exactly 15 minutes. That was pretty stressfull! Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f

RE: Benchmark CCIE [7:47320]

it configure routers under time presure: memorization of configs or sequence in which the router operates Thanks, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47384t=47320 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http

Re: Benchmark CCIE [7:47320]

Understood ... THANKS Chuck!!! Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47395t=47320 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure

Re: Benchmark CCIE [7:47320]

Don, I did not understand your post. Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47401t=47320 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct

RE: ISDN DDR and Routing Protocols [7:47301]

I don't know which IGP protocols you run on your network (if any)... so this is just a wild guess. If you were running RIP it could trigger the link ... (I would add: access-list 101 deny udp any any eq 520) If you were running OSPF (I would add: access-list 101 deny ospf any any) Pierre

Re: Lab comming Frakin' out here [7:47055]

I know the feelling ... You said: But what is really scaring me is the Old Stuff like Bridging, Token, IPX. Then why not postpon your lab and take the lab after November. Apparently they are removing ipx and token ring? Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form

RE: ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496]

From router B, I pinged a boggus destination. This triggered the bri interface on router B. Here is the output of the debug dialer events from Router A. You can see that router A (for no apparent reason) is trying to call router B (even though it is router B who initiated the call.) Of course the

RE: ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496]

No I am not running any routing protocol! Here are my configs: isdn1 (router A) isdn1#show run Building configuration... Current configuration : 1166 bytes ! version 12.2 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname isdn1 ! enable

RE: ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496]

is the need to open a second channel when there is one already opened? Shouldn't Router A use the already existing channel? Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46630t=46496 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription

Re: ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496]

Gaz, you are going to have to educate me on cultural issues ... What is wrong with those numbers ? (ip host isdn2 2065 1.1.1.1) Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46631t=46496 -- FAQ, list archives

Re: ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496]

Interfaces up and I am renumbering the loopbacks I will let you know. Thanks! Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46649t=46496 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list

Re: ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496]

to router B ... but then it would mean that something must have leaked from A to B to prone routerA to initiate a connection ... but what if not ip data? I will do some more research on this and post my findingsremaksquestions in a next post. Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com

RE: 5-4-3 rule segment definition for 10BaseT [7:46439]

Well here is a start: the 5-4-3 rule reffers to 5 segments 4 repeaters 3 populated segments Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46667t=46439 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http

ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496]

Router A and Router B are connected to an Atlas 550 via BRI interfaces Router A ATLAS --- ROUTER B Both router are configured with DDR Dialer maps so that Router A can call router B or vice-versa (basic stuff). When Router A is called by Router B, Router A answers normally and the link

ISDN ....Challenging Problem! [7:46500]

Posted to Cisco Newsgroup at 3:30 on June 13, 2002 Router A and Router B are connected to an Atlas 550 via BRI interfaces Router A ATLAS --- ROUTER B Both router are configured with DDR Dialer maps so that Router A can call router B or vice-versa (basic stuff). When Router A is called by

RE: SNMP Management Using a Switch [7:46196]

Switches can do Layer 3 switching (hardware base routing) if they have a router module or a router switch feature card. Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 8:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Frame-Relay - [7:46076]

Steven, thanks for the answer. I am still have questions ... Where do I find original documents on Frame-Relay? Thanks Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46172t=46076 -- FAQ, list archives

CCIE RS vs CCIE Design [7:46173]

. Thank you, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46173t=46173 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL

Frame-Relay - [7:46076]

taken care of my first burst. During the next four bursts, I am paying back so to speak on my credit line because I am sending less than the CIR. So on the 9th Tc interval I can burst again. Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46076t=46076

Frame Relay Traffic Shaping - [7:45962]

to speak on my credit line because I am sending less than the CIR. So on the 9th Tc interval I can burst again. Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45962t=45962 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http

RE: To much! [7:45865]

Try exercising... It does increase mental stamina. Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45965t=45865 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct

CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535]

those who gracefully took the time to answer my questions. I particularly want to thank Priscilla and Leigh Anne who both put me back on track several times during the last two years and Daniel Cotts for squeezing some time out of his busy schedule to spend some time discussing Cisco with me. Pierre

Re: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535]

The IOS documentation has a section on QoS. Check CC0 Regarless of your method of preparation you need to take some test to check your understanding. Boson was a great help in that matter. Good luck on your exam. Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i

TCP IP Sequence numbers [7:45131]

is already the next segment number ... thanks Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45131t=45131 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct

RE: Check My EIGRP Configuration [7:45065]

Best of luck to you! Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 2:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Check My EIGRP Configuration [7:45065] Dear Kris, Karago, Pierre-Alex, Chuck, Steven, Brian and everybody thanks

RE: TCP IP Sequence numbers [7:45131]

Priscilla, I read section 3.3 of RFC 793. Everything is clear... Thanks for stressing out those important points of semantic. Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 1:59 PM

RE: Check My EIGRP Configuration [7:45065]

Looks good ... I would also add a bandwidth statement on the serial interfaces to specify 64 Kbps This way the metric calculated by EIGRP will match your actual network bandwidth This would make a difference if your network became more complex ... Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From

RE: ISDN-PRI-BRI [7:45083]

You need the ISDN switch or switch simulator Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Juan Blanco Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 10:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ISDN-PRI-BRI [7:45083] Team, We have a 7200 with the following

RE: ISDN-PRI-BRI [7:45083]

This is is really cool! I was not aware of this. Thanks, Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steven A. Ridder Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 12:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ISDN-PRI-BRI [7:45083] Here's the links I

CCIE written Commands [7:44730]

Just curious Do I need to review all my routing and switching commands for the CCIE written? Boson #3 have no emphasis on commands but Boson #1 does. Thank you, Pierre-Alex P.S. I assume this question does not violate the NDA . Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php

bit time [7:44142]

in the sentence The active monitor holds the token for 24-bit time how long is 24 bit times? (I am sure not one second!) Thanks, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44142t=44142 -- FAQ, list archives

bit time [7:44144]

in the sentence The active monitor holds the token for 24-bit time how long is 24 bit times? (I am sure not one second!) Thanks, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44144t=44144 -- FAQ, list archives

RE: bit time [7:44144]

Thank you Remmert. Can I assume that with a 16 Mb Token ring a bit time would be 16 bits per seconds? Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of C restion Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 6:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: bit time

RE: All-In-One CCIE Study Guide - Second Edition [7:42292]

Congratulations! Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Koen Zeilstra Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 3:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: All-In-One CCIE Study Guide - Second Edition [7:42292] Pierre, Sorry

RE: All-In-One CCIE Study Guide - Second Edition [7:42292]

Good luck to you, .. one more question. Are the mistakes in the second edition of Giles in the multiple choice questions or in the text itself? Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: Koen Zeilstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Koen Zeilstra Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 3:10 AM

All-In-One CCIE Study Guide - Second Edition [7:42292]

If the second edition of Giles' book a reliable study source. I read that the first edition was crippled with mistakes and I would like to know if all of them got fixed in the Second Edition. Thank you! Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42292t

TAC [7:42141]

You have worked with TAC on a case. The problem is resolved. Who will close the case? The TAC engineer or the customer Thanks, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42141t=42141 -- FAQ, list archives

RE: TAC [7:42141]

to their satisfaction ... I don't have access to the TAC Case Tool kit because I have no contract agreement with Cisco. Is there a button somewhere on the electronic form that says Close? Thank you, Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: Craig Columbus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday

RE: TAC [7:42141]

I called TAC this morning. I had no problem getting through. If you are in the US, the number is: 1 800 553 2447 Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steven A. Ridder Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 10:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Token Ring Errors - Simulating [7:41497]

Very useful. Thanks! Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of adam lee Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Token Ring Errors - Simulating [7:41497] Buy some tr nics and put them on a pc

output buffers swapped out [7:41985]

(resent) Can't find any explanation on CCO about output buffers swapped out (Ethernet interface) Any one has a definition of what it is and what could cause 146399903 output buffers swapped out on an Ethernet interface? thank you, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com

RE: output buffers swapped out [7:41986]

simply indicates a lot of traffic. No problem there! Pierre-Alex --- (resent) Can't find any explanation on CCO about output buffers swapped out (Ethernet interface) Any one has a definition of what it is and what could cause 146399903 output buffers swapped out

RE: US Robotics modem to Cisco 2514 [7:41894]

don't see what you type) Send us a copy of what your session and your running config Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Odette II Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 7:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: US Robotics

Token Ring Errors - Simulating [7:41497]

Do you know tool(s) that can generate Bad Token ring frames, duplicate tokens, etc... ? I would like to check my Token Ring troubleshooting skills. thank you! Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41497t=41497

Cisco Market Place [7:41336]

Internet Commerce information to sign the Internet Commerce Agreement for your company. Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41336t=41336 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com

TACACS+ [7:41095]

I am using Cisco Secure ACS v2.6 I can't find the location in the software where I can set the commands users can use (Authorization). Can you give me a hint? thank you, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41095t=41095

RE: TACACS+ [7:41103]

? Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41103t=41103 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

CCIE written / Lab ... partner [7:40781]

Anyone in Warsaw (Poland), preparing for the CCIE written / Lab? Please contact me of line. Thank you, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40781t=40781 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http

Best place to prepare for CCIE? [7:40362]

I lost my job in the US and I have to relocate. Which country would you go to? thanks Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40362t=40362 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http

RE: Logging - terminal monitor not working [7:39957]

Cool! I will spend sometime today learning how to use the bug tool... Thanks, Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 12:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Logging - terminal monitor not working [7:39957

Logging - terminal monitor not working [7:39957]

Kind of a silly problem but can't figure it out ... I am connected to R1 via telnet. I have turned on debugging of ip packets I also have issued the command terminal monitor Yet I do not get anything logged when I ping the Ethernet interface of R1 Any ideas? Thanks

RE: Logging - terminal monitor not working [7:39957]

Amazing I removed logging synchronous on line console 0 and debug worked I am curious, what is the reason for logging synchronous preventing debug outputs on terminal lines? Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lidiya

MAU 8228 [7:39891]

Has anyone used the IBM 8228 Token Ring MAU with Cisco routers? Do you recommend the product? Thank you, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39891t=39891 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info

RE: MAU 8228 [7:39892]

-Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex GUANEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 9:22 AM To: Cisco Subject: MAU 8228 Has anyone used the IBM 8228 Token Ring MAU with Cisco routers? Do you recommend the product? Thank you, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http

Sybex CCNP Lab [7:39527]

you have connected at the same time? b) What ISDN features can you configure on the routers: TROUBLESHOOGING a) What troubleshooting case scenario can you emulate on the software? b) Can you use debug on the equipment ANY COMMMENT YOU WANT TO MAKE ON THIS SOFTWARE: Thank you, Pierre-Alex

RE: BGP Issue... [7:38877]

The routers can be logically connected. However, to my knowledge, the best practice is that they are directly connected. Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stanzin Takpa Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 5:55 PM To: [EMAIL

Route-map - Boson - incorrect? [7:38553]

that this is a false statement. Am I correct or is the test correct? Thank you! Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=38553t=38553 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html

FW: Route-map - Boson - incorrect? [7:38554]

-Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex GUANEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 1:55 PM To: Cisco Subject: Route-map - Boson - incorrect? Here are two statements from BOSON and their associated answers: When a Match is made, the Route Map can change the route

RE: CCNP exams [7:38097]

Just to make sure: Student A passed is CCNP last week. His certification is valid for 3 years, regardless of changes in the content of the exams or the certification. Correct? Thank you, Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf

RE: Well it's my turn...CCIE#8878 [7:37145]

Congratulations! Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard Newman Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Well it's my turn...CCIE#8878 [7:37145] With many hours of reading and hands

VLSM and CIDR [7:37031]

If a routing protocol can do VLSM does that automatically mean that it can also do CIDR? Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37031t=37031 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http

RE: VLSM and CIDR [7:37031]

to support my arguments and I would like to know if I am correct.) Thanks, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37033t=37031 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html

RE: VLSM and CIDR [7:37031]

route aggregation. So I am prone to conclude that the ability to do VLSM does not automatically means that you can do CIDR . My two cents ... Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chuck Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 7:03 PM

RE: VLSM and CIDR [7:37031]

Ok, you win :) Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chuck Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 8:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: VLSM and CIDR [7:37031] well, to continue to beat this dead horse ( like anyone cares about RIPv2

Re: Spanning tree Protocol Questions [7:36559]

to be recomputed after a topology change Here is a word by word copy of the passage. The part I have problem about is the one with (!!) Thanks! Pierre-Alex --(e0)Bridge-1 (e1)-- (e0)Bridge 5(e1)---(e1) Bridge 4 (e0)---(e1)Bridge 3 (e0)---(e1)Bridge 2 (e0)--- (To bridge 1 e0) Cost

RE: Spanning tree Protocol Questions [7:36559]

So a blocked port can receive AND send BPDUs Correct? Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Cotts Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 2:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Spanning tree Protocol Questions [7:36559

RE: Spanning tree Protocol Questions [7:36559]

Never mind ... I think I got it! Thanks, Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex Guanel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 4:10 PM To: Daniel Cotts; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Spanning tree Protocol Questions [7:36559] So a blocked port can

  1   2   3   4   >