Hi,
The Pix don't route, but can I do this?
I have a 2 server 20 user small office.
I have a Pix 506 sitting in front of a 2621 with a T1 and a DSL link to the
Internet. I'm not looking to load balance or even do redundancy. I just
want traffic from the servers to use the T1 and I want traffi
Wayne,
Why not use the router to terminate the links, and put the PIX behind the
router? The PIX will inspect the traffic, and the router can send traffic to
different links depending on where it originated from. Usually a 515 may be
a better solution because it has a DMZ interface where the serv
I guess I have to plan on using BGP. But can I get away without using BGP?
I did plan on bringing both DSL and T1 into the 2621, I ment to say that the
pix is behind(on the inside).
Thanks
""Alex Lei"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Wayne,
>
> Why not use the r
You should be able to do exactly what you said as long as you have at least
2 public IP addresses. Use one for the interface and all regular users and
use the other IP for the two servers. Create two different nat and global
pairs.
John Kaberna
CCIE #7146 (R/S, Security)
NETCG Inc.
www.netcgi
You can't do it with the equipment you originally mentioned. You could,
however, put in two PIX 506, one on each ethernet interface of the 2621,
and use policy routing on the 2621 to handle the traffic to the two
providers. Not the most elegant solution, but it would work. I see no
reason t
http://www.radware.com/content/products/link.asp
-Original Message-
From: Wayne Jang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 2:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pix don't route [7:46356]
I guess I have to plan on using BGP. But can I get away without using BGP?
a lot against other RADware
products.
Sincerely,
Patrick J Greene
-Original Message-
From: Wayne Jang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 1:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Pix don't route [7:46356]
Hi,
The Pix don't route, but can I do this?
I hav
L PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 3:11 PM
>To: Wayne Jang
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Pix don't route [7:46356]
>
>
>You can't do it with the equipment you originally mentioned. You could,
>however, put in two PIX 506, one on each ethernet
e.
(this is kind of a nit, but saying the PIX doesn't route tends to confuse
people)
HTH,
Kent
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Wayne Jang
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 10:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Pix don't route [7:46356]
;the outside world?
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Craig Columbus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 3:11 PM
> >To: Wayne Jang
> >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: Pix don't route [7:46356]
> >
> >
&g
ternet.
> > >
> > >I wouldn't need BGP if I was making one of ther servers(FTP) available
to
> > >the outside world?
> > >
> > >-Original Message-
> > >From: Craig Columbus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >Sent: Wednesday, June
ng
> table, this means, by definition, it is "routing". It just doesn't have
the
> same features and functions for layer 3 forwarding that cisco routers
have.
> (this is kind of a nit, but saying the PIX doesn't route tends to confuse
> people)
>
> HTH,
>
some "fancy" routing techniques
like
> > PBR. However, the PIX does perform layer 3 forwarding based on its
> routing
> > table, this means, by definition, it is "routing". It just doesn't have
> the
> > same features and functions for layer 3 for
y,
> Patrick J Greene
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wayne Jang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 1:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Pix don't route [7:46356]
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The Pix don't route, but can I d
y and there are more options.
-Kent
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
John Kaberna
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 3:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pix don't route [7:46356]
What happens when the T1 provider goes down? Tho
15 matches
Mail list logo