Off the top of my noodle that looks good
Happy Turkey Day!!
MADMAN
"Bullock, Jason" wrote:
>
> I did check the archives on this one.
> There has been much talk of fast ether channel for sure.
> But I did not find a definitive answer, so please humor me for this
question
> on Fast Ether cha
I did check the archives on this one.
There has been much talk of fast ether channel for sure.
But I did not find a definitive answer, so please humor me for this question
on Fast Ether channel.
I am configuring Fast Ether channel from a 7513 with 2 fast e ports to a cat
6009 with 2 fast e por
: Re: FastEtherchannel configuration
I just noticed...this was fixed in IOS 12.0(5.2)XU.
Chris M.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris McCoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "David Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000
avid Jones
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FastEtherchannel configuration
I just noticed...this was fixed in IOS 12.0(5.2)XU.
Chris M.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris McCoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "David Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECT
I just noticed...this was fixed in IOS 12.0(5.2)XU.
Chris M.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris McCoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "David Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 7:59 PM
Subject: Re: FastE
Hi David,
This is an interesting problem. I do have a couple of questions about it:
1) Are you using trunking between the 6009 & the 3500's with VLANs?
2) Do you have VTP pruning turned on in the 6009?
The IOS-based Cisco switches have a nasty habit of not working with VTP
pruning, causi
Are you setting up trunking first.
Duck
- Original Message -
From: David Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 11:01 AM
Subject: FastEtherchannel configuration
> Does anyone have any experience configuring FastEtherchannel on Cisco
> switches?
port group 1
switchport mode trunk
spanning-tree portfast
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Donald B Johnson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 6:56 PM
To: David Jones; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FastEtherchannel configuration
Are you setting up trunking first.
ope this helps.
Don
CCNA, MCSE+I, CNE, Compaq ASE (yeah, yeah...big deal but humor me!)
>From: Martin Kowalewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Martin Kowalewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'Bert Sainz'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Cisco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This is very true - take the trunking off the ports you wish to run
FEC on, you're not connecting to another switch and I'm sure that the
Compaq server isn't much interested in other VLAN traffic.
When you get this going you'll have to set the port channels to "on"
- the compaq cards don't use
You do not need trunking on the ports to get them to work together... it's a
channel you need to configure. Since your subject includes FastEtherChannel,
I presume you already knew this? But you do not mention it in your message?
Sometimes there is a confusion between trunking and channeling. The
Are the Compaq servers using Tru64 Unix, Linux, or NT.
"Lex Luther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
8jq8lc$94b$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8jq8lc$94b$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello Everyone,
> One of my students has a compaq server with 2 nics, each configured on the
> Cisco 6500 switch. The
Did you set the native VLAN? 802.1q requires the setup of a native VLAN.
Martin...
-Original Message-
From: Bert Sainz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 3:04 PM
To: Cisco
Subject: Re: FastEtherchannel using Compaq Servers
Lex Luther wrote:
> Hello Every
Message-
From: Bert Sainz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 2:04 PM
To: Cisco
Subject: Re: FastEtherchannel using Compaq Servers
Lex Luther wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
> One of my students has a compaq server with 2 nics, each configured on the
> Cisco 6500 swi
Lex Luther wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
> One of my students has a compaq server with 2 nics, each configured on the
> Cisco 6500 switch. The Trunking is 802.1Q
> Both ports are configured identically but only one port works. Both ports
> are to work together to achieve the throughput speed.
> Span
The big difference is that EtherChannel uses a source/destination translation to
decide on which port in the EtherChannel Group to use for each
source/destination pairing in a frame. It doesn't use round-robin or destination
hashing or fragmentation or anything like that.
If you have a 2 port Eth
Cristina,
When you have more than one port connect to another switch, spanning tree
will disable all but one of the port. If that port (live) connection is
cut, spanning tree will enable one of the other port to transfer data. This
process waste ports that's disable. When you use Fast EtherCha
17 matches
Mail list logo
