what make groupstudy
worthwhile to me at least.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Brian
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 7:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CHALLENGE PROBLEM (was Re: For FR Grus [7:16635]) [7:16659]
On Tue, 21
reated by bridge as
different
> ports and frames will get forwarded.
>
> IGRP and split horizon have nothing to do with it.
>
> At least I think this is the problem :)
>
> Tony M
> #6172
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "suaveguru"
> To:
> Sen
s the problem :)
Tony M
#6172
- Original Message -
From: "suaveguru"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 7:55 PM
Subject: RE: CHALLENGE PROBLEM (was Re: For FR Grus [7:16635]) [7:16755]
> is it something to do with using classless rather than
> classful routing pro
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, suaveguru wrote:
> is it something to do with using classless rather than
> classful routing protocols?
no, it was answered already. It has to do with bridges blocking on ports
data is sourced from.
Brian
---
I'm buying / s
is
> that a router is expected to
> > >pass a packet out of an interface which is on its
> own subnet !! Doesn't
> > >compute! What is the routing protocol being used
> to route ip?? This is
> > >where the answer will lye
> > >
> > >---
Hi Cisco Lover,
Looks like the DLCIs advertised by the FR-Switch,
try use "no frame-relay inversearp" to disable
the spokes router keeps hearing the DLCIs from FR-Switch.
HTH
> Oopss
>
> Sorry guys...I donto know where it lost in b/w..Any way..I have write it
> here again.
>
> Thanks for th
cket out of an interface which is on its
> > own subnet !! Doesn't
> > > >compute! What is the routing protocol being used
> > to route ip?? This is
> > > >where the answer will lye
> > > >
> > > >-Origin
s expected
to
> > >pass a packet out of an interface which is on its own subnet !! Doesn't
> > >compute! What is the routing protocol being used to route ip?? This is
> > >where the answer will lye
> > >
> > >-Original Message-
>
Donald B Johnson jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: 21 August 2001 17:06
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: CHALLENGE PROBLEM (was Re: For FR Grus [7:16635])
> >[7:16681]
> >
> >
> >I don't think bridge will work on this network because
age-----
> > >From: Donald B Johnson jr
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >Sent: 21 August 2001 17:06
> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Subject: Re: CHALLENGE PROBLEM (was Re: For FR
> Grus [7:16635])
> > >[7:16681]
> > >
> > >
&g
wrong with the
below config that prevents them from communicating.
>
> Darrin Gibson
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wayne Wenthin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 12:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: CHALLENGE PROBLEM (was
You can just put the
DLCI's on differnt layer3 networks and it will work as is below.
>
>
> Rob
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Brian @groupstudy.com on 08/21/2001 02:10:42 PM
>
> Please respond to Brian
>
> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
>
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Sasha wrote:
> He is doing transparent bridging between pvc's, hence
> routing issues are irrelevant.
> The problem here is that a packet that comes into a physical
> interface is not transmitted back through the same physical
> interface (although on another pvc), and bridgi
e layer 3
addresses. This wouldn't explain why it works when the DLCIs are on
different layer 3 networks though.
Rob
Brian @groupstudy.com on 08/21/2001 02:10:42 PM
Please respond to Brian
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: RE: CHALLENGE PROBLEM (was
ust 21, 2001 9:35 AM
> Subject: Re: CHALLENGE PROBLEM (was Re: For FR Grus [7:16635])
[7:16687]
>
>
> > On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Donald B Johnson jr wrote:
> >
> > > I don't think bridge will work on this network because of split
ho
nal Message-
> From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 9:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: CHALLENGE PROBLEM (was Re: For FR Grus [7:16635]) [7:16659]
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Cisco Lover wrote:
>
> > Hi Guys..
> >
>
e! What is the routing protocol being used to route ip?? This is
> >where the answer will lye
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Donald B Johnson jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: 21 August 2001 17:06
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re
01 12:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: CHALLENGE PROBLEM (was Re: For FR Grus.... [7:16635])
[7:16702]
To me this looks very similar to bridging with DSL. Since you cannot
receive the ARP the router must proxy this.
At 09:52 AM 8/21/2001, McCallum, Robert wrote:
>you can correct me h
yeah you got irb and bvi and igrp on same interface you are creating loops
because SH is disabled
- Original Message -
From: "Brian"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 9:35 AM
Subject: Re: CHALLENGE PROBLEM (was Re: For FR Grus.... [7:16635]) [7:16687]
> On Tue, 21 Aug
---
From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 9:44 AM
To: Scott Hoover; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: For FR Grus [7:16635]
Doesn't disabling inverse arp only take effect on a router reboot?
-Original Message-
From: Scott Hoover [mailto:[EMA
Donald B Johnson jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: 21 August 2001 17:06
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: CHALLENGE PROBLEM (was Re: For FR Grus [7:16635])
>[7:16681]
>
>
>I don't think bridge will work on this network because of split horizon.
>
>
&
rews.com/job
~~~
-Original Message-
From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 9:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CHALLENGE PROBLEM (was Re: For FR Grus.... [7:16635]) [7:16659]
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Cisco Lover wrote:
> Hi Guys..
>
> Come with some New Q
yeah but he is using irb with a bvi and igrp it is probably a split h issue
it creating a loopa
- Original Message -
From: "McCallum, Robert"
To: "'Donald B Johnson jr'" ;
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 9:26 AM
Subject: RE: CHALLENGE PROBLEM (was Re: For F
tocol being used to route ip?? This is
where the answer will lye
-Original Message-
From: Donald B Johnson jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 August 2001 17:06
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CHALLENGE PROBLEM (was Re: For FR Grus.... [7:16635])
[7:16681]
I don't think bridge
Tuesday, August 21, 2001 7:51 AM
> Subject: CHALLENGE PROBLEM (was Re: For FR Grus [7:16635]) [7:16659]
>
>
> > On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Cisco Lover wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Guys..
> > >
> > > Come with some New Queston..
> >
> > hmm, ok, so your l
I don't think bridge will work on this network because of split horizon.
- Original Message -
From: "Brian"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 7:51 AM
Subject: CHALLENGE PROBLEM (was Re: For FR Grus [7:16635]) [7:16659]
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Cisco Lover wr
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Donald B Johnson jr wrote:
> How do you set up a sw as a full mesh and a network as a HUB and Spoke. I
> dont understand.
Because you only use some of the DLCI's, not all of them.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Cisco Lover"
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 7:
ald B Johnson jr"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: For FR Grus.... [7:16635]
> How do you set up a sw as a full mesh and a network as a HUB and Spoke. I
> dont understand.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Cisco Lover"
> To:
>
it a lab. Can anybody give
> confirmation on this?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 9:44 AM
> To: Scott Hoover; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: For FR Grus [7:16635]
>
>
> Doesn
t 21, 2001 8:10 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: For FR Grus [7:16635]
>
>
> Doesn't disabling inverse arp only take effect on a router reboot?
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Hoover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 21 August 2001 15:43
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: For FR Grus [7:16635]
Doesn't disabling inverse arp only take effect on a router reboot?
-Original Message-
From: Scott Hoover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 August 2001 15:43
To: [EM
How do you set up a sw as a full mesh and a network as a HUB and Spoke. I
dont understand.
- Original Message -
From: "Cisco Lover"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 7:08 AM
Subject: Fwd: For FR Grus [7:16635]
> Oopss
>
> Sorry guys...I donto know where it lost in b/w..Any way
You might be right, I would have to test in it a lab. Can anybody give
confirmation on this?
-Original Message-
From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 9:44 AM
To: Scott Hoover; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: For FR Grus [7:16635]
Doesn&#
Doesn't disabling inverse arp only take effect on a router reboot?
-Original Message-
From: Scott Hoover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 August 2001 15:43
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: For FR Grus.... [7:16635]
You can disable inverse arp on each interface on the s
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Cisco Lover wrote:
> Hi Guys..
>
> Come with some New Queston..
hmm, ok, so your looking for some challenging questions? Ok, I will post
one, its got FR in it. First I'll post the problem, followed by the
config:
THE PROBLEM
===
Users on DLCI's 200, 224, 201, 225 c
You can disable inverse arp on each interface on the spokes and then clear
the cache. That should prevent the spokes from seeing the unused dlci's,
but will require a static map of dlci to ip for each dlci you want to use.
""Cisco Lover"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTE
get rid of them? why? why not use them? after all, you are paying for them!
or you can call the telco and have them delete the dlci's you aren't using.
but as long as the dlci's are configured on the frame switch, LMI will
report their existence to you. this is a Good Thing, by the way.
Chuck
definitely !!
-Original Message-
From: Peter Van Oene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 August 2001 14:24
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: For FR Grus [7:16635]
Is there a question here that I'm missing?
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 8/21/2001 at 7:
Is there a question here that I'm missing?
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 8/21/2001 at 7:06 AM Cisco Lover wrote:
>Hi Guys..
>
>Come with some New Queston..
>
>For eg,
>our FR switch is setup for Full mesh,But out network is setup as Hub &
>Spoke
>FAQ, list archives, and subscrip
39 matches
Mail list logo
