On Jan 31, 11:56am, "Priscilla Oppenheimer" wrote:
} At 03:58 PM 9/10/01, Glenn Johnson wrote:
} >While I agree that such an arbitrary distinction has the potential to be
} >abused, this person is likely looking (hoping) for some heightened level
of
} >snip
} >
} >Worst case scenario -- give the r
EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Michael L. Williams
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 4:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296]
"Leigh Anne Chisholm" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Simple point
"Leigh Anne Chisholm" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Simple point is... not everyone that's got years and years of experience
> certified with Cisco. Many people I know don't feel that they have to
prove
> their knowledge by sitting an exam.
And on the flip-side
The style reminds me a bit of some job ads I've seen for government jobs
around here in the past. All guvvie jobs here used to have to be
advertised (in theory at least), so if they already had someone lined up
and didn't want to have too many other candidates the job criteria would
just be very
September 10, 2001 3:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert???
[7:19296]
>
>
> At 03:58 PM 9/10/01, Glenn Johnson wrote:
> >While I agree that such an arbitrary distinction has the potential
to be
> >abused, th
e I know don't feel that they have to prove
>their knowledge by sitting an exam.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>> EA Louie
>> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:37 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nday, September 10, 2001 3:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert???
[7:19296]
>
>
> At 03:58 PM 9/10/01, Glenn Johnson wrote:
> >While I agree that such an arbitrary distinction has the potential
to be
> >abused, this
1 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296]
>
>
> At 03:58 PM 9/10/01, Glenn Johnson wrote:
> >While I agree that such an arbitrary distinction has the potential to be
> >abused, this person is likely looking (hoping) fo
-Original Message-
> > From: Glenn Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:59 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject:RE: Is this goin
At 03:58 PM 9/10/01, Glenn Johnson wrote:
>While I agree that such an arbitrary distinction has the potential to be
>abused, this person is likely looking (hoping) for some heightened level of
>snip
>
>Worst case scenario -- give the recruiter your number in HEX, maybe they
>will be unable to conv
y, September 10, 2001 1:20 PM
Subject: RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296]
> My question is, what happens if a CCIE loses his number do to not
> recertifying? For example, if CCIE# 4000 doesn't recertify, is that number
> eligible for new CCIE's since i
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Leigh Anne Chisholm
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:45 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296]
>
>
> Just think. Howard B isn't qualified for that job because he
> d
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:RE: Is this going to be a trend for the
CCIE
> cert??? [7:19296]
>
> While I agree that such an arbitrar
]
Subject: RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296]
My question is, what happens if a CCIE loses his number do to not
recertifying? For example, if CCIE# 4000 doesn't recertify, is that number
eligible for new CCIE's since it is now open. So if I get my CCIE tomorro
Cisco. Many people I know don't feel that they have to prove
their knowledge by sitting an exam.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> EA Louie
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:37 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> S
available to me?
-Original Message-
From: Glenn Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE
c
That job looks like it sucks anyway...
sam sneed
""Eric Rogers"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I was just cruising on the dice jobs board when something caught my
> attention.
>
> dice.com/DandL/k/ktii.213.html (paste into your browser)
>
>
> T
While I agree that such an arbitrary distinction has the potential to be
abused, this person is likely looking (hoping) for some heightened level of
assurance that candidates will have many, many years of experience. I don't
know enough CCIEs to comment on the validity of such an assumption regar
that is not a big deal. One recruiter asking for a sub-3000 CCIE ensures
them someone with at least 5 years of CCIE experience. It may not be a
reflection of their overall experience, but apparently that's not what he's
looking for.
If you had taken and passed your lab exam at this time last ye
And I would imagine that this particular job will be posted for a while.
They just cut out a whole bunch of prospective candidates with their one
silly requirement.
Heather
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Rogers [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:02 PM
> To
I guess someone ran across Larry Seltzer's article in Fortune Small
Business...
Doesn't this get us back to the discussion where I stated that experience
isn't necessary the be-all and end-all of answering the question, "Who's the
best?" My point (and I'll say it again) is that experience doesn'
21 matches
Mail list logo
