"Priscilla Oppenheimer"
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:58 PM
> Subject: RE: Subnet question [7:60711]
>
>
> > Larry Letterman wrote:
> > >
> > > thats pris's job hereif she writes enough detailed
> > > answers we dont
I would set up VLAN's keep in mind you need to route between VLAN's. This is
done via RSM or router on a stick.
Daniel Ladrach
CCNA, CCNP
WorldCom
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60836&t=60711
--
FAQ, list archive
I would set up VLAN's keep in mind you need to route between VLAN's. This is
done via RSM or router on a stick.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tamhankar, Nitin
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 11:40 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Subnet question [7:607
have set up a four story building with 2000 P.C's , haven't had a
day's problem :)
-Original Message-
From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Subnet question [7:60711]
don't do anything. If
support mobile IP registration.
- Original Message -
From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer"
To:
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:58 PM
Subject: RE: Subnet question [7:60711]
> Larry Letterman wrote:
> >
> > thats pris's job hereif she writes enough detailed
&
>
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> > Behalf Of
> > > Tamhankar, Nitin
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 11:18 AM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subj
Of
> > Tamhankar, Nitin
> > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 11:18 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Subnet question [7:60711]
> >
> >
> > Thank you very much for taking pains to right such a detailed
> explanation.
> > Thank you
, Nitin
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 11:18 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Subnet question [7:60711]
>
>
> Thank you very much for taking pains to right such a detailed explanation.
> Thank you all for your answers they were very helpful.
>
> Thanks
>
Surely there are a lot of solutions; which I'd do is:
Define a different VLAN for each floor.
Connect the catalysts in each floor with trunk interfaces (802.1q)
Connect a Fast or Giga ethernet interface from a router to one of the
switches. You must setup that interface (both on the router an on
: RE: Subnet question [7:60711]
You may not need virtual LANs. Real LANs solve the problem. :-) This is a
classic case of subnetting.
With DHCP, the client should get the right address when it broadcasts after
it moves, so there's no issue.
Leaving DHCP out of the picture, the need to e
You may not need virtual LANs. Real LANs solve the problem. :-) This is a
classic case of subnetting.
With DHCP, the client should get the right address when it broadcasts after
it moves, so there's no issue.
Leaving DHCP out of the picture, the need to ensure that a moved node can't
communicate
don't do anything. If you put a 10.100.1.x host on the 10.100.2.x
network it won't work until you do change the IP.
Dave
Tamhankar, Nitin wrote:
> This might be a very elementary question for some of you guys but I would
> appreciate the answer.
>
> If an office which has 3 different floor
I'd probably use VLAN's.
Conf t
Int vlan 101
Int vlan 102
Int vlan 103
Then setup the DHCP to assign IP addresses accordingly.
Once that is done. Set the vlans to 101 for first floor, 102 for second
floor, and 103 for third floor.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAI
To expand on Johns suggestion, you might also try visiting www.learntosubnet.com
and/or downloading Chuck Sumeria's White Paper, "Understanding IP Addressing:
Everything You Ever Wanted To Know", at http://www.3com.com/nsc/501302s.html
Tom Lisa, Instructor, CCNA, CCAI
Community College of Souther
Use a mask of 198.144.163.1/26 (255.255.255.192). Assuming ip subnet-zero
is enabled, your networks would be 198.144.163.0, with hosts from .1-.62,
and 198.144.163.64, with hosts .65-.126.
Brant I. Stevens
Internetwork Solutions Engineer
Thrupoint, Inc.
545 Fifth Avenue, 14th Floor
New York, NY.
Hi,
With a 26 bit subnet mask (255.255.255.192)
198.144.163.1/26 and
198.144.163.64/26
That will give you hosts from 1 - 62 & 65 - 126
-Original Message-
From: Chcuk Murduck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 7. febrúar 2001 17:37
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Subnet Question
I have
If you have the IP address 198.144.163.1 / 25, the scope you have assigned
is from 198.144.163.0 through 198.144.163.127. This is 1 network with 128
(126 usable) hosts.
You can now change the subnet mask to 255.255.255.192, which changes your
situation to two subnetworks with 64 (62 usable) hosts
> I have a class assigned for example: 198.144.163.1
> mask 255.255.255.128 how do I subnet that to 2 >networks.
First, let's look at what you have, 198.144.163.1/25.
That gives you 126 usable addresses, 198.144.163.1-126.
Now, you want to further divide that into two subnets of 62 usable addres
sage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Ed Moss
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2001 10:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Subnet question
The 20 bit prefix extends four bits into the third octet (176).
176 in binary is 1011, so with the mask the address ends at
Correct. You need 14 subnets, a block of 16. Therefore your third octet will
be 176-191.
"Hunt Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Can anyone please explain to me how to derive the answer of this
> question?
>
> A company has been assigned a su
The 20 bit prefix extends four bits into the third octet (176).
176 in binary is 1011, so with the mask the address ends at 1011.
You want to use the next four bits for subnetting (last four 0's)
This gives the range of 1011 (176) through 1011 (191)
providing 16 subnets with 256 addres
Chuck wrote...
[Lots snipped]
Well, enough ranting. Got things to do and wives to please. Enjoy the rest
of this deliciously long weekend.
Chuck
Sorry, I can't resist asking... how many wives is that, and are they all
yours???
And slightly more on track, 11.2(17) on a 4700 and 2514 won't ac
September 04, 2000 1:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: Subnet Question
It is true in regard of wild-cards.
-Original Message-
From: Albert Ip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: ??? ? 03 ?? 2000 19:14
To: 'Chuck
I gotta remember to unlearn all the bad things I learned as a Windows
network administrator :->
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale
Cantrell
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2000 5:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Original Message Follows
From: Albert Ip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Albert Ip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Chuck Larrieu'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Aaron Moreau-Cook
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Subnet Question
Date:
It is true in regard of wild-cards.
-Original Message-
From: Albert Ip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: ??? ? 03 ?? 2000 19:14
To: 'Chuck Larrieu'; Aaron Moreau-Cook; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Subnet Question
Chuck,
Just tried it on a 3662 with IOS 12.1T and
EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2000 3:06 AM
To: Aaron Moreau-Cook; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Subnet Question
I hate questions like this. Can, May, Always, Never.
RFC 1812 strongly discourages this practice.
On the other hand, the world won't end if you do. You may eve
PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2000 7:36 AM
Subject: Re: Subnet Question
The answer to the question as stated would be false, but - you *can* use
discontiguous masks in access lists, which can be a pretty handy feature
sometimes.
Sincerely,
Bradley J. Wilson
CC
The answer to the question as stated would be false, but - you *can* use
discontiguous masks in access lists, which can be a pretty handy feature
sometimes.
Sincerely,
Bradley J. Wilson
CCNA, CCDA, MCSE, CCSE, CNX-A, MCT, CTT
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Moreau-Cook
To: [EMAIL PROT
I hate questions like this. Can, May, Always, Never.
RFC 1812 strongly discourages this practice.
On the other hand, the world won't end if you do. You may even create a
permanent income for yourself by setting up your network like this. ;-> All
the TCP stacks I have worked with allow this on th
Theoretically you could do it, but everyone who's ever attempted it had been
taken out and bludgeoned to death by their coworkers, so in practice the
answer would be B) False.
""Aaron Moreau-Cook"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Question taken
eptember 02, 2000 7:45 PM
> To: Casey Fahey; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Subnet Question
>
>
> This was a fascinating topic that was previously discussed back
> in July of 1999. I bookmarked it for reference, because I found
> the debate so interesting. You might want to
Saturday, September 02, 2000 7:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Subnet Question
>
>
> Golly, sorry to tell you this, but I think you are on the 'proverbial
> crack'... I would answer B on any Cisco, MS, Nortel or any other
> test you
> care to put i
Golly, sorry to tell you this, but I think you are on the 'proverbial
crack'... I would answer B on any Cisco, MS, Nortel or any other test you
care to put in front of me...
A subnet mask determines the place where the bits on the left (the network
bits) are divided from the bits on the right
34 matches
Mail list logo