Re: Subnet question

2001-01-27 Thread Ed Moss
The 20 bit prefix extends four bits into the third octet (176). 176 in binary is 1011, so with the mask the address ends at 1011. You want to use the next four bits for subnetting (last four 0's) This gives the range of 1011 (176) through 1011 (191) providing 16 subnets with 256 addres

Re: Subnet question

2001-01-27 Thread ItsMe
Correct. You need 14 subnets, a block of 16. Therefore your third octet will be 176-191. "Hunt Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Can anyone please explain to me how to derive the answer of this > question? > > A company has been assigned a su

RE: Subnet question

2001-01-28 Thread Bob Vance
sage- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Moss Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2001 10:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Subnet question The 20 bit prefix extends four bits into the third octet (176). 176 in binary is 1011, so with the mask the address ends at

Re: Subnet Question

2001-02-07 Thread John Neiberger
> I have a class assigned for example: 198.144.163.1 > mask 255.255.255.128 how do I subnet that to 2 >networks. First, let's look at what you have, 198.144.163.1/25. That gives you 126 usable addresses, 198.144.163.1-126. Now, you want to further divide that into two subnets of 62 usable addres

RE: Subnet Question

2001-02-07 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
If you have the IP address 198.144.163.1 / 25, the scope you have assigned is from 198.144.163.0 through 198.144.163.127. This is 1 network with 128 (126 usable) hosts. You can now change the subnet mask to 255.255.255.192, which changes your situation to two subnetworks with 64 (62 usable) hosts

RE: Subnet Question

2001-02-07 Thread Egill Már Ólafsson
Hi, With a 26 bit subnet mask (255.255.255.192) 198.144.163.1/26 and 198.144.163.64/26 That will give you hosts from 1 - 62 & 65 - 126 -Original Message- From: Chcuk Murduck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 7. febrúar 2001 17:37 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Subnet Question I have

RE: Subnet Question

2001-02-07 Thread Brant Stevens
Use a mask of 198.144.163.1/26 (255.255.255.192). Assuming ip subnet-zero is enabled, your networks would be 198.144.163.0, with hosts from .1-.62, and 198.144.163.64, with hosts .65-.126. Brant I. Stevens Internetwork Solutions Engineer Thrupoint, Inc. 545 Fifth Avenue, 14th Floor New York, NY.

Re: Subnet Question

2001-02-07 Thread Tom Lisa
To expand on Johns suggestion, you might also try visiting www.learntosubnet.com and/or downloading Chuck Sumeria's White Paper, "Understanding IP Addressing: Everything You Ever Wanted To Know", at http://www.3com.com/nsc/501302s.html Tom Lisa, Instructor, CCNA, CCAI Community College of Souther

Re: Subnet Question

2000-09-02 Thread Casey Fahey
Golly, sorry to tell you this, but I think you are on the 'proverbial crack'... I would answer B on any Cisco, MS, Nortel or any other test you care to put in front of me... A subnet mask determines the place where the bits on the left (the network bits) are divided from the bits on the right

RE: Subnet Question

2000-09-02 Thread Leigh Anne Chisholm
Saturday, September 02, 2000 7:48 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Subnet Question > > > Golly, sorry to tell you this, but I think you are on the 'proverbial > crack'... I would answer B on any Cisco, MS, Nortel or any other > test you > care to put i

RE: Subnet Question

2000-09-02 Thread Cisco
eptember 02, 2000 7:45 PM > To: Casey Fahey; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Subnet Question > > > This was a fascinating topic that was previously discussed back > in July of 1999. I bookmarked it for reference, because I found > the debate so interesting. You might want to

Re: Subnet Question

2000-09-02 Thread David Williams
Theoretically you could do it, but everyone who's ever attempted it had been taken out and bludgeoned to death by their coworkers, so in practice the answer would be B) False. ""Aaron Moreau-Cook"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Question taken

RE: Subnet Question

2000-09-03 Thread Chuck Larrieu
I hate questions like this. Can, May, Always, Never. RFC 1812 strongly discourages this practice. On the other hand, the world won't end if you do. You may even create a permanent income for yourself by setting up your network like this. ;-> All the TCP stacks I have worked with allow this on th

Re: Subnet Question

2000-09-03 Thread Bradley J. Wilson
The answer to the question as stated would be false, but - you *can* use discontiguous masks in access lists, which can be a pretty handy feature sometimes. Sincerely, Bradley J. Wilson CCNA, CCDA, MCSE, CCSE, CNX-A, MCT, CTT - Original Message - From: Aaron Moreau-Cook To: [EMAIL PROT

Re: Subnet Question

2000-09-03 Thread Tim O'Brien
PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2000 7:36 AM Subject: Re: Subnet Question The answer to the question as stated would be false, but - you *can* use discontiguous masks in access lists, which can be a pretty handy feature sometimes. Sincerely, Bradley J. Wilson CC

RE: Subnet Question

2000-09-03 Thread Albert Ip
EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2000 3:06 AM To: Aaron Moreau-Cook; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Subnet Question I hate questions like this. Can, May, Always, Never. RFC 1812 strongly discourages this practice. On the other hand, the world won't end if you do. You may eve

RE: Subnet Question

2000-09-04 Thread Gils
It is true in regard of wild-cards. -Original Message- From: Albert Ip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: ??? ? 03 ?? 2000 19:14 To: 'Chuck Larrieu'; Aaron Moreau-Cook; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Subnet Question Chuck, Just tried it on a 3662 with IOS 12.1T and

RE: Subnet Question

2000-09-04 Thread Dale Cantrell
Original Message Follows From: Albert Ip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Albert Ip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Chuck Larrieu'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Aaron Moreau-Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Subnet Question Date:

RE: Subnet Question

2000-09-04 Thread Chuck Larrieu
I gotta remember to unlearn all the bad things I learned as a Windows network administrator :-> Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Cantrell Sent: Monday, September 04, 2000 5:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

RE: Subnet Question

2000-09-04 Thread Chuck Larrieu
September 04, 2000 1:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: Subnet Question It is true in regard of wild-cards. -Original Message- From: Albert Ip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: ??? ? 03 ?? 2000 19:14 To: 'Chuck

RE: Subnet Question

2000-09-04 Thread jenny . mcleod
Chuck wrote... [Lots snipped] Well, enough ranting. Got things to do and wives to please. Enjoy the rest of this deliciously long weekend. Chuck Sorry, I can't resist asking... how many wives is that, and are they all yours??? And slightly more on track, 11.2(17) on a 4700 and 2514 won't ac

RE: Subnet question [7:60711]

2003-01-09 Thread Nathan Nakao
I'd probably use VLAN's. Conf t Int vlan 101 Int vlan 102 Int vlan 103 Then setup the DHCP to assign IP addresses accordingly. Once that is done. Set the vlans to 101 for first floor, 102 for second floor, and 103 for third floor. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAI

Re: Subnet question [7:60711]

2003-01-09 Thread MADMAN
don't do anything. If you put a 10.100.1.x host on the 10.100.2.x network it won't work until you do change the IP. Dave Tamhankar, Nitin wrote: > This might be a very elementary question for some of you guys but I would > appreciate the answer. > > If an office which has 3 different floor

RE: Subnet question [7:60711]

2003-01-09 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
You may not need virtual LANs. Real LANs solve the problem. :-) This is a classic case of subnetting. With DHCP, the client should get the right address when it broadcasts after it moves, so there's no issue. Leaving DHCP out of the picture, the need to ensure that a moved node can't communicate

RE: Subnet question [7:60711]

2003-01-09 Thread Tamhankar, Nitin
: RE: Subnet question [7:60711] You may not need virtual LANs. Real LANs solve the problem. :-) This is a classic case of subnetting. With DHCP, the client should get the right address when it broadcasts after it moves, so there's no issue. Leaving DHCP out of the picture, the need to e

Re: Subnet question [7:60711]

2003-01-09 Thread Francisco Sedano/Inf-Pronet
Surely there are a lot of solutions; which I'd do is: Define a different VLAN for each floor. Connect the catalysts in each floor with trunk interfaces (802.1q) Connect a Fast or Giga ethernet interface from a router to one of the switches. You must setup that interface (both on the router an on

RE: Subnet question [7:60711]

2003-01-09 Thread Larry Letterman
, Nitin > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 11:18 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Subnet question [7:60711] > > > Thank you very much for taking pains to right such a detailed explanation. > Thank you all for your answers they were very helpful. > > Thanks >

RE: Subnet question [7:60711]

2003-01-09 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Of > > Tamhankar, Nitin > > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 11:18 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Subnet question [7:60711] > > > > > > Thank you very much for taking pains to right such a detailed > explanation. > > Thank you

RE: Subnet question [7:60711]

2003-01-09 Thread Larry Letterman
> > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > > Behalf Of > > > Tamhankar, Nitin > > > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 11:18 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subj

Re: Subnet question [7:60711]

2003-01-09 Thread Xia Hongbing
support mobile IP registration. - Original Message - From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" To: Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:58 PM Subject: RE: Subnet question [7:60711] > Larry Letterman wrote: > > > > thats pris's job hereif she writes enough detailed &

RE: Subnet question [7:60711]

2003-01-10 Thread Peri Sophos
have set up a four story building with 2000 P.C's , haven't had a day's problem :) -Original Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Subnet question [7:60711] don't do anything. If

RE: Subnet question [7:60711]

2003-01-10 Thread Ladrach, Daniel E.
I would set up VLAN's keep in mind you need to route between VLAN's. This is done via RSM or router on a stick. > -Original Message- > From: Tamhankar, Nitin > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 11:40 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Subnet question [7:607

RE: Subnet question [7:60711]

2003-01-10 Thread Ladrach, Daniel E.
I would set up VLAN's keep in mind you need to route between VLAN's. This is done via RSM or router on a stick. Daniel Ladrach CCNA, CCNP WorldCom Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60836&t=60711 -- FAQ, list archive

Re: Subnet question [7:60711]

2003-01-10 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
"Priscilla Oppenheimer" > To: > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:58 PM > Subject: RE: Subnet question [7:60711] > > > > Larry Letterman wrote: > > > > > > thats pris's job hereif she writes enough detailed > > > answers we dont