The answer is simple...Cisco support is unbeatable and
the best in the world
VetteBoy
--- wirechild wrote:
> I must greatly agree with you! We have about 750
> Remote sites that
> used to be about 40% cisco and 60% Nortel/Bay. We
> had such a
> horrible time with getting support out of Nor
I've been doing Cisco for a few years at large clients, and recently took on
a Nortel client.
If you want a lot of hand-holding Nortel is not the choice. On the other
hand, if you are able to get your support from some other source, the Nortel
equipment is drastically cheaper and the backplanes
a job bagging
groceries
One eye on the cockpit,
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Robert Hanley
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 6:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RANT Longish, Why Cisco and not ...!!! [7:19933]
I wasn&#x
nd broken code? definitely. Consistency for consistency's
sake? Well...ummm...errr...ahhhjust document it really well and upgrade
if/when you find the need.
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Larrieu"
To: "EA Louie" ;
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 5:38 PM
Subj
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Robert Hanley
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 10:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RANT Longish, Why Cisco and not ...!!! [7:19933]
Chuck & group;
So, all this is understood about certs & why, etc...; and anyone who has
essage-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> EA Louie
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 2:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: FW: Why Cisco and not ...!!! [7:19933]
>
>
> > ya know, I am a fan of if it ain't broke, d
ield one will need to know more than how to swap a few disks
>to install Win2K or Netware. One may need to know more than a few basic IOS
>commands.
>
>JMHO
>
>Chuck
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>Robert Hanley
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> EA Louie
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 2:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: FW: Why Cisco and not ...!!! [7:19933]
>
>
> > ya know, I am a fan of if it ain't broke, don't fix it,
rade
fixes an identifiable problem. These days, the latest IOS is not necessarily
the best IOS.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
EA Louie
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 2:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: Why Cis
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RANT Longish, Why Cisco and not ...!!! [7:19933]
I wasn't going to clutter up the list and waste B/w, but you asked me to
enlighten you, and I guess the information should be available to all. Yes,
I am responding using a different email address b
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Robert Hanley
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 1:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RANT Longish, Why Cisco and not ...!!! [7:19933]
Please don't take this the wrong way, I don't mean to
come off as being snotty, but you kind of make
I wasn't going to clutter up the list and waste B/w, but you asked me to
enlighten you, and I guess the information should be available to all. Yes,
I am responding using a different email address because its convenient; but
I'm the same Robert Hanley.
If you read the thread in context I responde
All this is very educational and almost useless to the task at hand. Many of
us are here to prepare ourselves for the toughest test we've ever taken
outside of marriage (I aint kidding folks), and have chosen this path for
several good reasons. None of which are related to the sour grapes between
the wide open Internet
> is all some companies can afford & Frame is very
> slow in the Southwestern
> areas (TouchAmerica POP's). We have NAT because of
> IPV4, & we have fiber
> going into housing developments because they were
> built where facilities do
> no
essage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Patrick Ramsey
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 3:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RANT Longish, Why Cisco and not ...!!! [7:19933]
preach on brother!
I would have to agree with everything you said. Like I have po
ynced to mainline version: 11.1(9)
> > Copyright (c) 1986-1997 by cisco Systems, Inc.
> > Compiled Wed 26-Mar-97 22:34 by bellb
> > Image text-base: 0x60010900, data-base: 0x60A0A000
> >
> > ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 5.3.2(3.2) [kmac
> > 3.2], MAIN
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Patrick Ramsey
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 3:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RANT Longish, Why Cisco and not ...!!! [7:19933]
preach on brother!
I would have to agree with everything you said. Like I have posted before,
we were an extreme shop before we went cisco
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Robert Hanley
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 3:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RANT Longish, Why Cisco and not ...!!! [7:19933]
What a load of cisco bigotry crap! Thank god for you
guys who know better, huh? Even the folks at cisco
call
s, 23 weeks, 2 days, 14
> hours, 26 minutes
> System restarted by reload at 19:50:36 UTC Fri Apr 4
> 1997
> System image file is "slot0:1119ca.bin", booted via
> slot0
>
> David Toalson
> 816-701-4142
>
> > --
> > From: chica[SMTP:[EMAI
ELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
>
> CHSDCB uptime is 4 years, 23 weeks, 2 days, 14
> hours, 26 minutes
> System restarted by reload at 19:50:36 UTC Fri Apr 4
> 1997
> System image file is "slot0:1119ca.bin", booted via
> slot0
>
> David Toalson
> 816-701-4142
>
>
> ya know, I am a fan of if it ain't broke, don't fix it, but dudeDo you
Me too. and if I never have to mess with the routers because they're doing
their job, then why upgrade or futz with them, especially a core router? I
love to tinker just like everyone else, but the great thing about a
days, 14 hours, 26 minutes
System restarted by reload at 19:50:36 UTC Fri Apr 4 1997
System image file is "slot0:1119ca.bin", booted via slot0
David Toalson
816-701-4142
> --
> From: chica[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: chica
> Sent:
Friday, September 14, 2001 8:43 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Why Cisco and not ...!!! [7:19933]
>
> Hello Guys,
>
> after recovering from the shock of WTC,I just
> remembered that life still has to goes on.
> I have a quest and it is : I
; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Why Cisco and not .......!!! [7:19933]
>
>
> Hello Guys,
>
> after recovering from the shock of WTC,I just
> remembered that life still has to goes on.
> I have a quest and it is : I am due to appear on an
> interview on Monday 17th Se
Hello Guys,
after recovering from the shock of WTC,I just
remembered that life still has to goes on.
I have a quest and it is : I am due to appear on an
interview on Monday 17th Sep., and I have to give a
presentation on why cisco, and not other competitors.
I have to be able to convince my inter
25 matches
Mail list logo
