On 10 Dec 2007, at 17:49, Tom Rons wrote:
> Now it reports 2048 for currrent and max and guess what, ircd runs...
> How peculiar that you first have to raise the FD limit manually to fix
> the max limit, at least to me it seems. :)
OK, last run. I have tried everything again from scratch with the
On 10 Dec 2007, at 15:04, Tom Rons wrote:
> On 10 Dec 2007, at 06:03, Michael Poole wrote:
>> One early step would be to change line 185 in s_bsd.c (the "error
>> setting max fd's" line) to something like this:
>> fprintf(stderr, "error setting max fds to %d: %s\n", limit,
>> strerror(errno));
>> T
On 10 Dec 2007, at 06:03, Michael Poole wrote:
> One early step would be to change line 185 in s_bsd.c (the "error
> setting max fd's" line) to something like this:
> fprintf(stderr, "error setting max fds to %d: %s\n", limit,
> strerror(errno));
> That would at least give the error message, alt
Richard writes:
> Actually they can set up a sandbox, since the under-pinnings of OS X
> is Darwin, which is freely available for download, and is all that is
> needed for ircu.
The only thing I could find after almost an hour of searching was a
list of 300 downloadable packages of source code, w
Actually they can set up a sandbox, since the under-pinnings of OS X
is Darwin, which is freely available for download, and is all that is
needed for ircu.
On 12/10/07, Holland Rhodes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some time ago I submitted a patch to compile ircu on OS X (which I
> believe it or so
Some time ago I submitted a patch to compile ircu on OS X (which I
believe it or some variant of it was used). I don't have time to write
one for 10.5 but I can provide a shell on a 10.5.1Server if that
would be of any use.
On Dec 9, 2007, at 9:03 PM, Michael Poole wrote:
> Tom Rons write
Tom Rons writes:
> Hello,
>
> I am running into an error when trying to start u2.10.12.12 on MacOS X
> 10.5.1. I got the latest release through cvs and it compiled
> flawlessly. However, after I create an ircd.conf in the "new syntax",
> when I try to start the daemon I get the following err
On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 18:57 +0200, Tom Laermans wrote:
> > Again, most clients directly support /connect
> > without need for /quote...
>
> Most clients will probably connect to the argument passed themselves
> instead of passing it on to the server ;-)
I find that unlikely. CONNECT is in RFC145
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 16:49 -0400, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote:
> Again, most clients directly support /connect
> without need for /quote...
Most clients will probably connect to the argument passed themselves
instead of passing it on to the server ;-)
Tom
__
on 25/05/07 22:50, « Michael Poole » <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Florin Iamandi writes:
>
>> We are running ircu2.10.12.10 but we can test without problems any patch
>> or alternative ircu version.
>> Is there any way to make this kind of setup work?
>
> Currently, no. ircu resolves Connect bl
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 21:58 +0200, Florin Iamandi wrote:
> A /quote stats c does list the dynamic IP server:
FYI, most clients support a /stats command without needing to /quote it.
> A /quote sconnect country.example.net from the hub generates:
There is no "SCONNECT" command, but the result you
Florin Iamandi writes:
> We are running ircu2.10.12.10 but we can test without problems any patch
> or alternative ircu version.
> Is there any way to make this kind of setup work?
Currently, no. ircu resolves Connect block hostnames on startup and
rehash.
Michael Poole
doh, sorry
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 5/10/2006, at 01:50, Carlo Wood wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 01:20:53AM +1300, Whale wrote:
ooohh sorry. 2.10.12.08
Richard wrote:
Hiya,
2.10.12.which? There are some known issues with some specific
2.10.12.* versions that may be the cause of your pr
Kevin L. Mitchell writes:
> On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 16:17 +1300, Whale wrote:
>> Basically everything has worked fine, and i run the daemon which seems
>> to run fine. Except the fact I can't connect?? Running the debug
>> switch comes out fine, and -k says there are no errors in the conf
>> f
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 01:20:53AM +1300, Whale wrote:
> ooohh sorry. 2.10.12.08
>
> Richard wrote:
> >Hiya,
> >
> >2.10.12.which? There are some known issues with some specific
> >2.10.12.* versions that may be the cause of your problem, so which
> >exact version you are running would be helpf
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 16:17 +1300, Whale wrote:
> Basically everything has worked fine, and i run the daemon which seems
> to run fine. Except the fact I can't connect?? Running the debug
> switch comes out fine, and -k says there are no errors in the conf
> file. I've tried to cut down as m
ooohh sorry. 2.10.12.08
Richard wrote:
Hiya,
2.10.12.which? There are some known issues with some specific
2.10.12.* versions that may be the cause of your problem, so which
exact version you are running would be helpful.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 4/10/2006, at 16:17, Whale wrote:
Hi team,
Hiya,
2.10.12.which? There are some known issues with some specific
2.10.12.* versions that may be the cause of your problem, so which
exact version you are running would be helpful.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 4/10/2006, at 16:17, Whale wrote:
Hi team, sorry to be a pain.
Was wishing to
I suppose it has to do with the following, wanted, behaviour:
+b abc* --> server <-- +b ab*
If the abc* reaches the server first, then the +b ab* needs
to send -b abc* +b ab* to the _clients_ (not the server(s)
on the left, overlapping bans should be taken care of automatically).
Thus, appare
On Sunday 26 Oct 2003 12:23 am, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> (I mean, Kqueue is great, but not all servers run *bsd (netbsd has
> kqueue now, so that should make it *))
As a general policy we support BSD, Linux and Solaris. The modular event
engine is kev's addition, so adding a new polling met
On Sun, 2003-10-26 at 12:46, Perry Lorier wrote:
> Ian Kumlien wrote:
>
> >
> >>Thank you for your report, however, in future can you send bug reports
> >>to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'll get onto fixing this ASAP.
> >
> >on ircu universal you get "can't part, not on that channel" so, moving
> >the "us
Ian Kumlien wrote:
Thank you for your report, however, in future can you send bug reports
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'll get onto fixing this ASAP.
on ircu universal you get "can't part, not on that channel" so, moving
the "user has parted" up somewhere in the code + adding a check if it's
miss
On Sat, 2003-10-25 at 17:29, Perry Lorier wrote:
> Florin wrote:
> >This PART-ONLY flood can be made this way: /part #chann,#chann,#chann,
> >#chann,#chann,#chann#chann,#chann,#chann,#chann
> >
> >Now here comes the reason I mail here: I have tested this command on
> >2 networks with hybrid Ircd a
Florin wrote:
Here's a log of the issue:
***
[01:27:29] * Parts: nate` ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
[01:27:29] * Parts: nate` ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
[01:27:29] * Parts: nate` ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
[01:27:29] * Parts: nate` ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
[01:27:29] * Parts: nate` ([EMAIL PROTECT
There are only two flags for opers in IRCu.
Global Oper line O:
and local oper line o:
You have to define your opers in your ircd.conf file.
There is already a info present in the conf, read carefully.
- Original Message -
From: "Sandra Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
S
There are all changes between 2.10.11.00 and 2.10.11.04
2002-01-05 Perry Lorier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*
include/patchlevel.h: Release this sucker
2003-01-04 Kevin L Mitchell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*
ircd/m_burst.c (ms_burst): There's a possibility that the user
could be
de
William Pettersson wrote:
>
> I was just wondering how do I initially set the password in the o: line? I
> know it is encrypted, but how? I've tried using no password, but that didn't
> work.
> Thanks
it is a program called "mkpasswd", in a tools or crypt subdir in the
ircu package.
- Original Message -
From: "William Pettersson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 4:45 AM
Subject: [Coder-Com] ircu o: lines
> I was just wondering how do I initially set the password in the o: line?
I
> know it is encrypted, but how? I've tr
>
Please do not send HTML emails to this list. This is email, not the
web.
> Now I am facing another problem:
> I try to set up a network as i mensioned, but I can only connect 2 servers
> with each other. When I try to connect a third one, i get the following error
> s:
Your servers are not
Also to coder-com@ :)
Those lines look ok ... rehashed the config file?
You also have to reoper (mode ownnick -o, oper)
> Hi,
>
> I am facing a problem during server configuration.
> We are configuring an irc network here internal, and some external
> servers.
>
> I try to use the /quote opmode
> I try to use the /quote opmode command, and get "command disabled".
[snip]
> F:CONFIG_OPERCMDS:TRUE
> F:OPER_KILL:TRUE
> F:OPER_REHASH:TRUE
> F:OPER_RESTART:TRUE
> F:OPER_DIE:TRUE
> F:OPER_GLINE:TRUE
> F:OPER_LGLINE:TRUE
> F:OPER_JUPE:TRUE
> F:OPER_LJUPE:TRUE
> F:OPER_OPMODE:TRUE
> F:O
her <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] IRCu Ident Proceedure
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 20:43:40 +0100
Chris Crowther wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tuesday 19 November 2002 22:52, tim ireland wrote:
>
> > for up
Chris Crowther wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tuesday 19 November 2002 22:52, tim ireland wrote:
>
> > for up to 3 minuites
> > is there any way to fix this?
>
> At a guess I'd say there's an over zealous firewall somewhere blocking the
> ident reply
> Hi, the IRCu server that we run on our server, versionu2.10.11.02 seems to
> be constantly freezing at the chack ident stage for every connecting user,
> for up to 3 minuites
> is there any way to fix this?
Sounds like you may have a firewall in the way that's blocking the outgoing
connect. Y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 19 November 2002 22:52, tim ireland wrote:
> for up to 3 minuites
> is there any way to fix this?
At a guess I'd say there's an over zealous firewall somewhere blocking the
ident reply traffic, so that ircu is not getting the repl
Change the #include to and recompile..
Cheers,
net
- Original Message -
From: "christoph burgdorfer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 9:04 AM
Subject: [Coder-Com] ircu message
> hi man!
>
> i just tried to compile ircu, but there was the followi
> i recently installed http://coder-com.undernet.org/ircu2.10.10.pl18.tgz on
> my freebsd-4.6-stable server which is colocated.. the install went fine, the
> execution went fine, but after running the server for a minute or so, it
> started eating resources. within a few minutes it was at 95% cpu/
Hi,
The only IRC daemon that you can make IRCore services to work is:
IRCu2.10.07
They didnt work on the latest relases.
Cti-
> Hi Coder-Com, sorry to bother you. I'm currently using u2.10.07 with
IRCore
> (CS6.2)...I was wondering if there was a way to make u2.10.10.pl20 work
the
> same way as u
> > You actually expect highly alpha code to work?
> why not ? i use the developement version since start of .11 (when it was an
> alpha) and i rarely see it not work at all (i may have chance :))
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHhahahahahahahahahHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAhahahahahah!!!
HTH, HAND.
--
K
Chris Crowther écrit:
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Jean-Edouard BABIN wrote:
>
> > But when I launch it, both port are closed (but the server run)
> > Anyboldy has an idea ? It's a bug ?
>
> You actually expect highly alpha code to work?
why not ? i use the developement version since start of
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Jean-Edouard BABIN wrote:
> But when I launch it, both port are closed (but the server run)
> Anyboldy has an idea ? It's a bug ?
You actually expect highly alpha code to work? And yes it's a
bug, I have the same problem (which is a pain when you're trying to do
some
Jean-Edouard BABIN wrote:
>
> On 22/03/02 11:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
>
> > Just out of curiosity, is integrated SSL/TLS support on the agenda for
> > ircu?
>
> You can link server with ssh if you need it...
Aye, I've already got client/server connections working fi
On 22/03/02 11:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, is integrated SSL/TLS support on the agenda for
> ircu?
You can link server with ssh if you need it...
For info
On host1 :
ssh -C -f -n -L 6789:host2:4400 login@host2 sleep 600
This do a compressed (-C) ss
> Just out of curiosity, is integrated SSL/TLS support on the agenda for
> ircu?
Integrated? Probably not; there are, unfortunately, a host of legal
problems that have to be carefully thought out. Ridiculous that that
is the case, but it is. Now one of my goals is to have modular
support for
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, is integrated SSL/TLS support on the agenda for
> ircu?
/me looks at Isomer and smirks ;)
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
> How about chanmode +B to be able to ban users based on there userid
> (the lower would be for ban, the higher for userid, simply check on AC token
> if it matches, in combination with chanmode +r you should have a nice system
> to keep certain users out without the option to evade such a ban.
> Alas, I already did this. As can be seen in the SERVER out string in the
> logs I mailed, the connections are set to around 200 odd. The standard for
> gnuworld is AAz which is around 50 somewhere.
>
> Also, I should point out that evern with the 50 set, it still falls over
> with more than 4 o
Alas, I already did this. As can be seen in the SERVER out string in the
logs I mailed, the connections are set to around 200 odd. The standard for
gnuworld is AAz which is around 50 somewhere.
Also, I should point out that evern with the 50 set, it still falls over
with more than 4 or 5 clients.
> OK.. have been tearing my hair out for a while now trying to figure out
> why this happens...
I triggered this while playing with X the other day. The basic problem is
that the client capacity information sent to ircu must be a number of the
form (2^n)-1. I'm not sure where that capacity val
> Any chance of help with this:
>
> [frozen@meadow:ircu2.10]$ make install
> Installing ircd...
> cannot create /tmp/ircd.tag: permission denied
> *** Error code 2
Get your system administrator to fix /tmp's permissions or remove an existing
/tmp/ircd.tag file.
--
Kevin L. Mitchell <[EMAIL PROT
Please do not send HTML or multipart/alternative emails to this list.
> I have heard that there is a way to impliment an /omode command on =
> IRCu - is this true? If so, how would I go about doing this?
ircu2.10.11, which is presently in development, has a /opmode command for
the use of IR
51 matches
Mail list logo
