Re: [jelly] gump taglib breakages

2005-01-20 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you mean the gump build is broken, or the taglibs build in isolation is broken? In the httpclient needs codec now case this really is just a place where the taglib inherits a dependency on commons-codec via commons-httpclient but

Re: [BETWIXT] Betwixt debug logging problem.

2005-01-20 Thread Konstantin Priblouda
--- robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this is a bug which has now been fixed on CVS HEAD. please upgrade. hopefully there will be a release sometime soon... thanks. Unfortunately I'm behind firewall, so no CVS access is possible. regards, = [ Konstantin Pribluda (

Re: [jelly] RC2?

2005-01-20 Thread Paul Libbrecht
We should maybe make a round of the bugs submitted, or ? Hans mentioned he wanted to give a stab at JELLY-177, looks good. Looks like JELLY-191 and JELLY-196 could be considered... Any opinion ? paul Le 20 janv. 05, à 06:43, Dion Gillard a écrit : Yep, I'm up for RC2 after some testing and then

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/feedparser build.xml

2005-01-20 Thread burton
burton 2005/01/20 00:54:06 Modified:feedparser build.xml Log: ... Revision ChangesPath 1.12 +4 -3 jakarta-commons-sandbox/feedparser/build.xml Index: build.xml === RCS file:

Re: [jelly] gump taglib breakages

2005-01-20 Thread Brett Porter
Stefan Bodewig wrote: In the httpclient needs codec now case this really is just a place where the taglib inherits a dependency on commons-codec via commons-httpclient but the project.xml doesn't know this. If you add this, I don't think anything else needs to change and it should be perfectly

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/feedparser/src/java/org/apache/commons/feedparser/locate AnchorParser.java AnchorParserListener.java ProbeLocator.java

2005-01-20 Thread burton
burton 2005/01/20 01:00:37 Modified:feedparser/src/java/org/apache/commons/feedparser DefaultFeedDirectoryParserListener.java FeedDirectoryParserListener.java FeedFilter.java FeedParser.java

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/feedparser/src/java/org/apache/commons/feedparser/locate AnchorParserException.java

2005-01-20 Thread burton
burton 2005/01/20 01:00:57 Added: feedparser/src/java/org/apache/commons/feedparser/locate AnchorParserException.java Log: ... Revision ChangesPath 1.1

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/feedparser/tests/directory xfn1.html

2005-01-20 Thread burton
burton 2005/01/20 01:01:38 Added: feedparser/tests/directory xfn1.html Log: ... Revision ChangesPath 1.1 jakarta-commons-sandbox/feedparser/tests/directory/xfn1.html Index: xfn1.html

RE: [Email] To release or not to release

2005-01-20 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Ok, thanks... build was done. before I now roll the release one question, I got this *test failure* does anyone know more about that? Thanks! Matthias test:test: [junit] Running org.apache.commons.mail.DefaultAuthenticatorTest [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time

Re: [jelly] gump taglib breakages

2005-01-20 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stefan Bodewig wrote: In the httpclient needs codec now case this really is just a place where the taglib inherits a dependency on commons-codec via commons-httpclient but the project.xml doesn't know this. If you add this, I don't

Re: [jelly] gump taglib breakages

2005-01-20 Thread Brett Porter
Yes, in practice this is going to be fine, but its hardly a good practice to introduce a stated dependency on something you're not using. True. But that you are going to use soon 8-) You could upgrade the dependency to httpclient 3.0-beta. Is httpclient 2.0 instantaneously disappearing

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33176] New: - copyPropertes(List, List) does not work - pls warn about this

2005-01-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33176. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[jira] Commented: (JELLY-85) TagScript doesn't clear its cached tags after run()

2005-01-20 Thread Paul Libbrecht (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-85?page=comments#action_57828 ] Paul Libbrecht commented on JELLY-85: - Is thread guarantees the following excerpt of Tag interface javadoc? A Tag is only ever used by a single thread so that Tag

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33176] - [beanutils] copyProperties(List, List) does not work - pls warn about this

2005-01-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33176. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [JXPath] On contributing XOM-support

2005-01-20 Thread Torsten Curdt
I think we will have to wait 'till the issues around the licenses are resolved. I am very sorry about that. For now I could put a link on the JXPath home page pointing to your site. I hope that this issue will be resolved. A link to my site and any comments are welcome. Once again, thank you.

Re: [logging] API - methods for logging entry and exit events

2005-01-20 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Tomas Znamenacek wrote: 4. The event of method entry or exit is a trace kind of event and should not be logged at different severity(should not have a method on the logging interface) but it should be encapsulated in the message that is being logged. Also, some enter/exit events might have more

Re: [jelly] gump taglib breakages

2005-01-20 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is httpclient 2.0 instantaneously disappearing when 3.0 is released? Don't most projects think that way? There are some honorary exceptions, but how often do you see use 2.x instead if users find a bug in 1.x? Moving these

Re: [jelly] gump taglib breakages

2005-01-20 Thread Brett Porter
Is httpclient 2.0 instantaneously disappearing when 3.0 is released? Don't most projects think that way? There are some honorary exceptions, but how often do you see use 2.x instead if users find a bug in 1.x? Yes, but if it is working fine, there is rarely motivation to move just

Re: [jelly] RC2?

2005-01-20 Thread Brett Porter
Looks good in Maven 1.1 HEAD. Still leaking memory in multiproject sites, but I haven't done any recent work to isolate the cause of that. JSL remains the suspect, but nothing solid to back that. +1 on an RC2 release after standing bugs are fixed. - Brett Dion Gillard wrote: Yep, I'm up for RC2

sandbox VFS

2005-01-20 Thread Stéphane Rault
Hello, I'm trying to use the wonderful VFS. It works quite well but I've a problem with writing in zip file. Searching for informations, I wonder if VFS is still a live project and if sometimes, it will leave the sandbox to become a complete Jakarta-Common project ? I want to use it in a

[commons-el] new release?

2005-01-20 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi folks, on your project site the last release is from 2003. There are some changes in CVS that aren't reflected by the shipped JAR. eg. Logger replaced by [commons-logging] eg. Coercions' methods refactored... Do you plan to roll out a new release? That contains these changes? Thanks,

Re: [JXPath] unordered node-sets

2005-01-20 Thread Knut Wannheden
Dmitri, Dmitri Plotnikov dmitri at apache.org writes: Ok, I think I now get it. Sorry about having been so obtuse. To make the search interruptable, we should eliminate the isChildOrderingRequired method. Actually I don't even know why we have it. Paths like //foo would produce results in

Re: [JXPath] On contributing XOM-support

2005-01-20 Thread shirasu hiroyuki
Dear Torsten, Thank you very much for your advice. I will try to negotiate with them for a different licence. Thanks, -- shirasu hiroyuki([EMAIL PROTECTED]) From: Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JXPath] On contributing XOM-support Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:19:15 +0100 snip/

Re: [logging][PROPOSAL] 1.0.5 release

2005-01-20 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 from me. On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:26:01 -0800, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 Craig On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 22:49:09 +, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IMO the first step before any work can begin on any improvements is to release the current code (this

[jira] Updated: (JELLY-177) In JellyServlet, the procedure used to determine the script's location is too simplistic

2005-01-20 Thread dion gillard (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-177?page=history ] dion gillard updated JELLY-177: --- Version: 1.0-beta-5 1.0-RC1 (was: 1.0) Fix Version: 1.0-RC2 In JellyServlet, the procedure used to determine

Re: [vfs] sandbox VFS

2005-01-20 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Stéphane Rault wrote: I'm trying to use the wonderful VFS. It works quite well but I've a problem with writing in zip file. Searching for informations, I wonder if VFS is still a live project and if sometimes, it will leave the sandbox to become a complete Jakarta-Common project ? I want to use

Re: [vfs] sandbox VFS

2005-01-20 Thread Stéphane Rault
Mario Ivankovits wrote: Well, VFS is alive in a manner that I try to fix major problems and reported bugs. I decided to go in small steps as I use it in our project as java.io.File replacement (where possible) and thus have to ensure its stability. Currently I feel very comfortable about its

Re: [vfs] sandbox VFS

2005-01-20 Thread filipdef
You are right, I too think its time to discuss a plan how to migrate it to commons proper - I planed to poll for it in a couple of months. Not sure what the community thinks about it. Hi -- I use it as a crucial piece of one of my projects and it's behaving beautifully.. I'm all for moving it

[vfs] file locking

2005-01-20 Thread Mario Ivankovits
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PS: any specs for what you'd like to do file locking wise? It's one of the things I need next, so maybe I can help? I would like to see what [transaction] http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/transaction/ do and if this could be used for this purpose. A first look at it

Re: sandbox VFS

2005-01-20 Thread B. K. Oxley (binkley)
Stéphane Rault wrote: I'm trying to use the wonderful VFS. It works quite well but I've a problem with writing in zip file. Searching for informations, I wonder if VFS is still a live project and if sometimes, it will leave the sandbox to become a complete Jakarta-Common project ? I'd like to

[vfs] more FileUtils

2005-01-20 Thread Mario Ivankovits
B. K. Oxley (binkley) wrote: I'd like to see some more utility methods for manipulating file objects. For example, much of my code needs: void saveAs() throws IOException; void moveTo() throws IOException; void copyTo() throws IOException; For sure, we could introduce a FileUtils,

Re: [vfs] more FileUtils

2005-01-20 Thread Brian Oxley
Mario Ivankovits wrote: ... this MaybeBackup is a thing we could discuss at its own. How should a backup be done and named? a) backup to *.bak b) use versioning - e.g. *.bak_01, *.bak_02 b.1) with max versions c) use timestamping - e.g. *.bak_20050101 c.1) but not more than 20 backups Just an

Re: [vfs] more FileUtils

2005-01-20 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Brian Oxley wrote: Mario Ivankovits wrote: ... this MaybeBackup is a thing we could discuss at its own. How should a backup be done and named? a) backup to *.bak b) use versioning - e.g. *.bak_01, *.bak_02 b.1) with max versions c) use timestamping - e.g. *.bak_20050101 c.1) but not more than 20

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33184] New: - ability to set a default Locale on the ValidatorResources

2005-01-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33184. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33185] New: - testSaveInvalidURL in TestFileConfiguration fails

2005-01-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33185. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33184] - [validator] Ability to set a default Locale on the ValidatorResources

2005-01-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33184. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33185] - [configuration] testSaveInvalidURL in TestFileConfiguration fails

2005-01-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33185. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[Jakarta Commons Wiki] Updated: Logging

2005-01-20 Thread commons-dev
Date: 2005-01-20T14:46:13 Editor: 82.38.65.173 Wiki: Jakarta Commons Wiki Page: Logging URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Logging Added link to 1.0.5 release development page Change Log: --

[Jakarta Commons Wiki] New: Logging/1.0.5ReleasePlan

2005-01-20 Thread commons-dev
Date: 2005-01-20T14:59:55 Editor: 82.38.65.173 Wiki: Jakarta Commons Wiki Page: Logging/1.0.5ReleasePlan URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Logging/1.0.5ReleasePlan Created release plan New Page: = Commons Logging 1.0.5 ReleasePlan = == Background == JCL 1.0.4 was

[Jakarta Commons Wiki] Updated: Logging/1.0.5ReleasePlan

2005-01-20 Thread commons-dev
Date: 2005-01-20T15:01:03 Editor: 82.38.65.173 Wiki: Jakarta Commons Wiki Page: Logging/1.0.5ReleasePlan URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Logging/1.0.5ReleasePlan no comment Change Log: --

Re: [logging][PROPOSAL] 1.0.5 release

2005-01-20 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 19 Jan 2005, at 22:51, Richard Sitze wrote: robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/19/2005 04:49:09 PM: snip i'm willing to act as release manager for this release. my vision would be that a release branch would be taken as soon as possible but with a long release candidate phase

Re: [BETWIXT] Betwixt debug logging problem.

2005-01-20 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 20 Jan 2005, at 08:40, Konstantin Priblouda wrote: --- robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this is a bug which has now been fixed on CVS HEAD. please upgrade. hopefully there will be a release sometime soon... thanks. Unfortunately I'm behind firewall, so no CVS access is possible.

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/betwixt/src/test/org/apache/commons/betwixt/xmlunit XmlTestCase.java

2005-01-20 Thread rdonkin
rdonkin 2005/01/20 15:09:45 Modified:betwixt/src/java/org/apache/commons/betwixt/schema ComplexType.java Element.java ElementReference.java GlobalComplexType.java GlobalElement.java LocalComplexType.java Schema.java

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/betwixt/src/test/org/apache/commons/betwixt/schema TestRecursiveBeanSchemaGeneration.java

2005-01-20 Thread rdonkin
rdonkin 2005/01/20 15:10:05 Added: betwixt/src/test/org/apache/commons/betwixt/schema TestRecursiveBeanSchemaGeneration.java Log: Fixed buggy behaviour when creating schema for beans with cyclic graphs. Unit tests contributed by Susan Liu. Issue#33168

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/betwixt/src/test/org/apache/commons/betwixt/schema ParentColumn.java

2005-01-20 Thread rdonkin
rdonkin 2005/01/20 15:10:20 Added: betwixt/src/test/org/apache/commons/betwixt/schema ParentColumn.java Log: Fixed buggy behaviour when creating schema for beans with cyclic graphs. Unit tests contributed by Susan Liu. Issue#33168 Revision Changes

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/betwixt/src/test/org/apache/commons/betwixt/schema LoopBean.java

2005-01-20 Thread rdonkin
rdonkin 2005/01/20 15:11:18 Added: betwixt/src/test/org/apache/commons/betwixt/schema LoopBean.java Log: Fixed buggy behaviour when creating schema for beans with cyclic graphs. Unit tests contributed by Susan Liu. Issue#33168 Revision Changes

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/betwixt/src/test/org/apache/commons/betwixt/schema CyclicBean.java

2005-01-20 Thread rdonkin
rdonkin 2005/01/20 15:12:37 Added: betwixt/src/test/org/apache/commons/betwixt/schema CyclicBean.java Log: Fixed buggy behaviour when creating schema for beans with cyclic graphs. Unit tests contributed by Susan Liu. Issue#33168 Revision Changes

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/betwixt/src/test/org/apache/commons/betwixt/schema CyclicColumn.java

2005-01-20 Thread rdonkin
rdonkin 2005/01/20 15:13:51 Added: betwixt/src/test/org/apache/commons/betwixt/schema CyclicColumn.java Log: Fixed buggy behaviour when creating schema for beans with cyclic graphs. Unit tests contributed by Susan Liu. Issue#33168 Revision Changes

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/betwixt/src/test/org/apache/commons/betwixt/schema CyclicLayer.java

2005-01-20 Thread rdonkin
rdonkin 2005/01/20 15:15:38 Added: betwixt/src/test/org/apache/commons/betwixt/schema CyclicLayer.java Log: Fixed buggy behaviour when creating schema for beans with cyclic graphs. Unit tests contributed by Susan Liu. Issue#33168 Revision Changes

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33168] - [Betwixt] release 0.6 can't generate XML schema for cyclic bean.

2005-01-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33168. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[digester][VOTE] Remove licence text from javadoc

2005-01-20 Thread Simon Kitching
Hi, In August 2004, the build.xml file was modified so that when generating Javadoc a copy of the apache licence was inserted as an xml comment into the footer of generated pages. Unforunately, this has caused complications, because javadoc appears to have cross-platform issues with the quote

Re: [digester][VOTE] Remove licence text from javadoc

2005-01-20 Thread Martin Cooper
For now, I am -1 on this. Unless I'm mistaken, the reason the license is in there is because we were specifically asked by the board to include it. Until we are explicitly told by the board that this is no longer the case, I believe it needs to stay there. I don't count Brian's comments on

RE: [jelly] RC2?

2005-01-20 Thread Hans Gilde
Could you give me an example of something that leaks? If Maven reuses the JellyContext, it'll still leak. Maven would have to add in a line to clear the Tag cache. -Original Message- From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 6:12 AM To: Jakarta Commons

RE: [jelly] RC2?

2005-01-20 Thread Hans Gilde
I'm for fixing JELLY-177 and JELLY-196 (haven't really looked at 196, just the description). 191 is for a TagLib, so it would be released separately anyway. The code for JELLY-177 looks good when copied verbatim. I did a couple of Servlet tests but nothing that could be automated without Cactus.

[jira] Commented: (JELLY-85) TagScript doesn't clear its cached tags after run()

2005-01-20 Thread Hans Gilde (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-85?page=comments#action_57868 ] Hans Gilde commented on JELLY-85: - Absolutely, this would be much easier. But it gets complicated when you look at what creating a new context means. Like, contexts search up

RE: [jelly] RC2?

2005-01-20 Thread Brett Porter
You'd need to build Maven from CVS HEAD to use the latest version of Jelly (it is currently set to beta-4, but I've tried it with RC2-SNAPSHOT as well - was just waiting for the release to update). maven multiproject:site for jelly-tags should do it. IIRC, the project is disposed of, so the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33190] New: - Facility for passing an Iterator object into the 'View' part of an MVC framework

2005-01-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33190. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33190] - Facility for passing an Iterator object into the 'View' part of an MVC framework

2005-01-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33190. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33190] - Facility for passing an Iterator object into the 'View' part of an MVC framework

2005-01-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33190. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33190] - Facility for passing an Iterator object into the 'View' part of an MVC framework

2005-01-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33190. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.