> Sigh.
Sorry to hear that..
> Ok, this is a little late, but...
>
> Before I read this thread, I put a link to the Gump feed in the sidebar
> for Planet Apache.
I think there was a lot of miscommunication (with thoughts passing like
ships in the night) as threads occured on blogs, on PlanetAp
On Jan 22, 2004, at 7:58 PM, Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
Finally, any progress from anybody on FOAF type metadata at Apache? As
I
said, I use PlanetApache to 'test out an author' (see if they
amuse/stimulate me) and I'd be just as fine w/ a FOAF chain of
relationships
as the PlanetApache blog roll. I
Sigh.
Ok, this is a little late, but...
Before I read this thread, I put a link to the Gump feed in the sidebar
for Planet Apache. I also posted why I chose to do this. My biggest
issue with the Gump feed was that it was drowning out (by volume) the
postings by people. I personally would
On 23 Jan 2004 09:12:06 +0100
David N. Welton wrote:
> > "Apache Planet -- is like a box of chocolates - you never know what
> > you are going to get!" ... ;-)
> What makes you believe planet might want to have this box?
Not sure. :)
Please read
http://jakarta.apache.org/gump/
and
http://jakart
> Much much more so: congratulations to everybody who slaved away on the
> new license for all these many years.
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/elsewhere.html#20040121.1
Congratulations to everybody who devoted to the new license
-
According to Joshua Slive:
> text in a comment in ALL documentation files? Where we have "source"
> (xml) and generated html files, do we treat the html as an "object" file
> and exclude the notice, or should we have it there too?
IMHO we should include it in all text and html files as well.
c
I think someone is working on an implimentation guide for the new license.
Could you please include and answer to this question:
Now that the new license can be explicitly applied to documentation,
should we include the
"Copyright [] [name of copyright owner]
Licensed under the Apache License
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, David N. Welton wrote:
> Greg Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > * The Board has approved the new Apache License 2.0. For a copy of
> > that license, please see http://www.apache.org/licenses/.
>
> > The Board has also mandated that all ASF software must be
> >
Greg Stein wrote:
* Last November, Roy Fielding resigned his position as a Director of the
ASF in order to have more time to "get real work done". Thus, we had a
vacancy on the Board which needed to be filled. The Board appointed
Sander Striker to fill that seat until the next ASF Mem
I think a concise, dense, daily front-panel summary of what's up in
various regions of apache summed up from the output of various bots is
a delightful thing. I think streaming it into planet apache is fine by
me. I agree that Mr. Gump was running off at the mouth a bit much for
my taste; bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Greg Stein wrote:
> * The Board has approved the new Apache License 2.0. For a copy of that
> license, please see http://www.apache.org/licenses/.
>
> The Board has also mandated that all ASF software must be switch
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
Finally, any progress from anybody on FOAF type metadata at Apache? As I
said, I use PlanetApache to 'test out an author' (see if they
amuse/stimulate me) and I'd be just as fine w/ a FOAF chain of relationships
as the PlanetApache blog roll. I know many folks reference their
Greg Stein wrote:
Happy New Year!
The Board met last Wednesday for its regular, monthly meeting. Since the
official board minutes will still need to be drafted, approved, and posted
to the web site, I am writing this email to give a brief summary of the
actions we took. Since this has an affect on
Greg Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * The Board has approved the new Apache License 2.0. For a copy of
> that license, please see http://www.apache.org/licenses/.
> The Board has also mandated that all ASF software must be
> switched to the new license by March 1st, 2004. Pleas
Wee! A reply-to header on a posting to committers. Way to go Greg!
Your an inspiration to us all!
Congratulations to Sander.
Much much more so: congratulations to everybody who slaved away on the
new license for all these many years.
Thank you!
- ben
On Jan 23, 2004, at 9:14 AM, Greg Ste
Tetsuya Kitahata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Gump's not a person. Like you said, the planet is for authors
> > (people) associated with apache.
Here is what emacs' "doctor" has to say about its younger electronic
colleague:
> Yep, Gump is not a person, but a chain restaurant of Shrimp
Forgot to mention
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 20:58:01 -0700
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
> Finally, any progress from anybody on FOAF type metadata at Apache? As I
> said, I use PlanetApache to 'test out an author' (see if they
> amuse/stimulate me) and I'd be just as fine w/ a FOAF chain of relationships
> a
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 20:58:01 -0700
(Subject: Gump Spam (was Re: Who decides who is 'worthy' for Planet Apache?))
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
> > I, for one, posted that Gump should be removed. I believe several others
> > chimed in with the same sentiment. So, Thom wasn't alone in his
> assessment
>
> I, for one, posted that Gump should be removed. I believe several others
> chimed in with the same sentiment. So, Thom wasn't alone in his
assessment
> in the situation. And, as to whether non-ASF content should be blogged,
> there was discussion about that on the Planet - and the consensus I
--On Thursday, January 22, 2004 8:26 AM -0700 "Adam R. B. Jack"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, now what? Do I just add it back, or what? Maybe Planet Apache needs
some PMC control...
This is *exactly* why Planet Apache isn't part of the ASF. The fact that
Thom exposes the RSS listing to the ASF
--On Wednesday, January 21, 2004 5:39 PM +0100 Leo Simons
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I believe many ASF projects are chronically late in sending in status
reports in time for the board meeting. That's bad and they should be
nagged about it. Since manual nagging is a chore, how about a small
scrip
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:32:33 -0500 (EST)
Dave Brondsema wrote:
> > I see Planet
> > Apache (as it stands today) as a way to get a flavour of an author, who has
> > some association w/ Apache, to see if I wish to add them to my own
> > aggregator or not. As such, I see no harm in Jakarta Gump partic
22 matches
Mail list logo
