+1 (but non-committer)
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Karl Wright
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 8:40 AM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1 Incubating, RC7
+1 for me.
Karl
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Karl
+1 (but a non-committer)
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Karl Wright
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2011 7:10 PM
To: connectors-dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1 Incubating, RC6
+1 from me.
Karl
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Karl Wright daddy
+ 1 from me (although I still haven't found time to do testing with Solr.)
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Simon Willnauer
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 9:11 AM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.1?
I checked out all
It's most likely the holidays. Too much of a mad rush, either to leave early
or to get real work done to try to leave early.
Sorry I wasn't able to find time to try out the RC. Hopefully... next week
will be slow and I'll have better luck finding a few minutes of quiet time.
-- Jack
I'm inclined to go ahead with a +1, but maybe it would be advisable to give
the RC a couple of days. (And maybe I'll finally get around to trying it out
as well.) If nobody objects by Wednesday/Thursday - and there are some
+1's - go ahead and say its done.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original
on here!)
On Nov 24, 2010, at 8:39 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
Uploaded RC1.
Karl
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
A problem with the FileNet connector has caused me to build an RC1.
It's uploading now.
Karl
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Jack Krupansky
releases. So,
0.1 does not need this right now.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Grant Ingersoll
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 10:23 AM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Release?
On Nov 10, 2010, at 1:22 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
And the wiki doc is also
. on a monthly/bi-monthly
basis as progress is made.
In short, get MCF as-is 0.1 out ASAP, have a very short list for MCF 0.5 to
get it out reasonably soon, and then revisit what 1.0 really means versus
0.6, etc.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Grant Ingersoll
Sent: Tuesday
think.
(Got to keep up with Google Connectors!)
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Karl Wright
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 9:28 AM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Release?
I'm in favor of a release. I'm not sure, though, what the release
parameters
without
a nightly build, but it would be nice to say that we also have a rolling
trunk release which is just the latest build off trunk and the latest
wiki/doc as well. So, some people may want the official 0.1, but others may
want to run straight from trunk/nightly build.
-- Jack Krupansky
Good enough for me. So I'll consider this deal closed -- by the community,
and that the name Apache ManifoldCF is official or as official as it can
get.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org
Sent: Sunday, October 17
I'd prefer that Grant close the deal on the name since he is the one with
clout at Apache, but you could do it as well, I suppose - I don't know how
these things really work yet.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12920568#action_12920568
]
Jack Krupansky commented on CONNECTORS-116:
---
It would be nice to see
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Framework crawler agent
Reporter: Jack Krupansky
Archive files such as zip, mbox, tar, etc. should be expanded into their
constituent files during crawling of repositories so that any output connector
would output the flattened archive
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12920730#action_12920730
]
Jack Krupansky commented on CONNECTORS-118:
---
Support within the file system
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12920787#action_12920787
]
Jack Krupansky commented on CONNECTORS-118:
---
Aperture's approach was just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12920801#action_12920801
]
Jack Krupansky commented on CONNECTORS-118:
---
One of those VFS links points
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12920801#action_12920801
]
Jack Krupansky edited comment on CONNECTORS-118 at 10/13/10 7:35 PM
. Grant,
any comments?
Karl
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 8:58 PM, Jack Krupansky
jack.krupan...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
I'm okay with all of that, but with a question whether we can get away
with
using an abbreviation in org.apache.mcf as opposed to
org.apache.manifoldcf. And then, whether
far (+1
and -1)? I'll let Karl send out a proper reminder of wherever he says we
are.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 11:08 AM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re
Ah, okay, that's cool. So if the vote fails (= 0 or 0?), we would then
vote on the next choice, which is... Manicon.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 12:01 PM
To: connectors-dev
Can we stick with a 8-person minimum quorum for this and most other votes?
In other words the vote closes at the deadline if there is a quorum, other
it stays open until 5 p.m. after there is a quorum.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright
.
So, next candidate on the list was... Manicon, 19
Unless it has legal problems, it fits our requirements.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 6:52 PM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 6:46 PM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
I'm tempted. Apache Nothing has a nice ring
-1 for me. Standing alone it's an okay name, but trying to actually use it
is a pain (and we might as well call it MCF). But I'll certainly go along
with the majority.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday
with three basic, core variations: ManifoldCF, MCF,
Manifold Connectors Framework.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 8:04 PM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Apache
When does this stage of voting close?
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 5:28 PM
To: connectors-dev connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Select a name to possibly replace
I'd give people another day since it seems so quiet.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 3:40 AM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Soliciting more potential names
Great! Anyone on this list can nominate names and vote. The more
participation, the better.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: George Aroush geo...@aroush.net
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 10:47 PM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject
I concur with having a base class for all ACF exceptions, and then the
specific exceptions extend that base.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 10:08 AM
To: connectors-dev
, like me, are clumsy with too much shift key action)
to MCF is somewhat... obvious. And when you lower-case the name for
package names to manifoldcf, it kind of looks weird.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org
Sent
That's a perfect example of what I was trying to suggest and avoids the
usage problems. Although it has too many syllables for my taste, but that's
just me.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010
, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Jack Krupansky
jack.krupan...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
I'd much prefer a simple, short, name. Using a descriptive phrase as a
name
has these problems. Tacking on CF does indeed fix one problem, but at
a
high cost.
That said, I am okay with a combo of a short name and a long
That sounds fine with me. Assuming by ACF you mean the full name Apache
Connectors Framework with ACF as the local informal name, although in
practice maybe everybody would refer to it, even externally, as ACF as
well, as was with LCF.
-- Jack Krupansky
]
Contour [Contor into a word to avoid misspelling]
Contango [Connectors are a bit of a dance; a term from commodities futures
trading]
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 4:27 PM
To: connectors
We could put CF on the end of each of the original short names and re-vote
them... but don't do that unless somebody seconds that approach.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 2:33 PM
+1
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 3:23 PM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pick either Apache Connectors Framework or Apache
ManifoldCF
Based on the level
I briefly reviewed the proposal wiki and it looks good good enough to move
forward. There may be revisions as we actually start using it, but this is
definitely a big step in the right direction.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright daddy
+1 to both - review of name and address the NTLM issue since ACF is getting
closer to where an actual 0.1 release could be considered.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Grant Ingersoll grant.ingers...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 1:35 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12909036#action_12909036
]
Jack Krupansky commented on CONNECTORS-98:
--
Looks good. This meets meets my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12908581#action_12908581
]
Jack Krupansky commented on CONNECTORS-98:
--
Just to confirm, as requested
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12908148#action_12908148
]
Jack Krupansky commented on CONNECTORS-98:
--
I am still pondering this embedded
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12907614#action_12907614
]
Jack Krupansky commented on CONNECTORS-98:
--
I have looked at the code a bit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12907712#action_12907712
]
Jack Krupansky commented on CONNECTORS-98:
--
Some RESTful resource doc:
http
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12907735#action_12907735
]
Jack Krupansky commented on CONNECTORS-98:
--
I think status is probably
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12907736#action_12907736
]
Jack Krupansky commented on CONNECTORS-98:
--
re: We could not pass (arguments
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12907758#action_12907758
]
Jack Krupansky commented on CONNECTORS-98:
--
re: the command cannot itself
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12907875#action_12907875
]
Jack Krupansky commented on CONNECTORS-98:
--
It makes sense that GetPathInfo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12907201#action_12907201
]
Jack Krupansky commented on CONNECTORS-104:
---
Simple works best
: Improvement
Components: Web connector
Affects Versions: LCF Release 0.5
Reporter: Jack Krupansky
Priority: Minor
Fix For: LCF Release 0.5
Unless the user explicitly enters an include regex carefully, a web crawl can
quickly get out of control and start
How about Macon... from Mac[hinery] + con[nection]. A small city, also a
dirigible airship.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 6:46 AM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re
!
Or, might J. K. Rowling sue us for stealing her work?
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 8:01 AM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: About name change -- Macon
I don't find
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-57?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12904746#action_12904746
]
Jack Krupansky commented on CONNECTORS-57:
--
This looks fine so far and should
1. Apache Yukon
2. Apache Macon
3. Apache Lukon
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 6:44 PM
To: connectors-dev connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Pick your preferred name
I
on
the exact list of name choices for the second decision.
Should there be a vote on whether to vote for abstract vs. descriptive or
just proceed to vote directly?
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org
Sent: Monday
.
descriptive issue is resolved.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 3:20 PM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: About name change
I think we should vote directly. Perhaps we can save
as the full name, with XYZ
as the official Apache name (or handle as I call it), where XYZ is a
placeholder for a name as yet to be determined. And Apache gets stuck on
the front of the name, by convention.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright daddy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12903559#action_12903559
]
Jack Krupansky commented on CONNECTORS-98:
--
I'll be mostly looking through code
, or whatever other handle is chosen.
As I said, I will defer to the PMC (?) endorses, but I would hope that there
is some consistency with current and traditional Apache project naming
conventions.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Simon Willnauer simon.willna
/browse/CONNECTORS-98
Project: Apache Connectors Framework
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: API
Affects Versions: LCF Release 0.5
Reporter: Jack Krupansky
Fix For: LCF Release 0.5
(This was originally a comment on CONNECTORS-56 dated 7/16
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12902982#action_12902982
]
Jack Krupansky commented on CONNECTORS-98:
--
Karl asks what do you plan to do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12902983#action_12902983
]
Jack Krupansky commented on CONNECTORS-98:
--
Karl says I await your patch
I am in favor of the change assuming the name change is officially official
despite the chatter on gene...@incubator.apache.org, but I'd like to see
some confirmation that the grumbling has subsided over there.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Karl
to read what the discussion was, or still is.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: karl.wri...@nokia.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 9:25 AM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE]: Change svn root for Apache Connectors Framework?
I'm
+1
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 1:49 PM
To: connectors-dev connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Need an opinion, on whether to change package or not
Consider this an official
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-56?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12888377#action_12888377
]
Jack Krupansky commented on CONNECTORS-56:
--
Some cURL and/or Perl test scripts
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-60?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12888000#action_12888000
]
Jack Krupansky commented on CONNECTORS-60:
--
Unless I am mistaken, the jetty
I'm no expert on licenses, so I would look at what Solr does and maybe ping
Grant. Presumably LCF should have a legal subdirectory somewhere for
license notices.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: karl.wri...@nokia.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 5:02
That would help. Keep in mind the Jira issue for bundling the database
server as well.
I was assuming that there was still some technical advantage to running LCF
in the non-QuickStart multi-process configuration.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-55?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12886720#action_12886720
]
Jack Krupansky commented on CONNECTORS-55:
--
Karl notes that we've had to mess
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-55?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12886724#action_12886724
]
Jack Krupansky commented on CONNECTORS-55:
--
When Karl says It *does* limit your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-55?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12886490#action_12886490
]
Jack Krupansky commented on CONNECTORS-55:
--
I was using the term install
Components: Framework core
Reporter: Jack Krupansky
LCF consists of a full-featured crawling engine and a full-featured user
interface to access the features of that engine, but some applications are
better served with a full API that lets the application control the crawling
: Lucene Connector Framework
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Framework core
Reporter: Jack Krupansky
Currently, LCF has a relatively high-bar or evaluation and use, requiring
developer expertise. Also, although LCF has a comprehensive UI, it is not
currently
If we need to require Java 1.6, that is probably okay. I am fine with that.
Does anybody have a serious objection to requiring Java 1.6 for LCF?
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: karl.wri...@nokia.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 6:35 AM
To: connectors
) Possibly commit to Solr.
7) AgentStop.
8) Back to step 1 for additional jobs.
Correct?
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: karl.wri...@nokia.com
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 7:24 PM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Derby
The daemon does
What is the nature of the single LCF process issue? Is it because the
database is being used in single-user mode, or some other issue? Is it a
permanent issue, or is there a solution or workaround anticipated at some
stage.
Thanks.
-- Jack Krupansky
.
Or maybe just a naming convention so that the name of the UI component can
be deduced given the logical name of a connector.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: karl.wri...@nokia.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 6:45 AM
To: connectors-dev
as is, provided that any phases of instability are relatively contained,
which seems to be the normal case here anyway.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: karl.wri...@nokia.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 9:00 AM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-37?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12874029#action_12874029
]
Jack Krupansky commented on CONNECTORS-37:
--
I'll defer to the community
advantage of such a config file is that it is easier for people to
post problem reports that show exactly how they set up LCF.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: karl.wri...@nokia.com
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 5:48 AM
To: connectors-dev
-party repository connectors cannot be
supported using a Solr-style plug-in approach? Or, worst case, as separate
processes with a clean inter-process API? Maybe not in the near-term, but as
a longer-term vision.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From
, leading-edge (bleeding-edge) users
are used to more than a little inconvenience. Still, a Solr-simple
evaluation install would be... sweet.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: karl.wri...@nokia.com
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 2:17 PM
To: connectors-dev
configuration that is ready to Start a crawl. Better to have one (or two
or three if necessary) config file that encompasses the entire
configuration setup rather than separate manual steps.
Whether it is high enough priority for the first release is a matter for
debate.
-- Jack Krupansky
84 matches
Mail list logo
