Digital Wokan wrote:
>"Contribs" aren't just for cooker.
>
>Blue Lizard wrote:
>
>>now why would you want 4.8.1 in contribs and 4.8.2 in cooker?
>>
>
>
seeing as this is the COOKER ml, i thought i need not specify
/pub/linux/*MANDRAKE-DEVEL*/co
now why would you want 4.8.1 in contribs and 4.8.2 in cooker?
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>Blue Lizard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>>
>>>Blue Lizard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>>>Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>you will use,
>
>-Byron
>
CHANGE THE SUBJECT AND USE NEW MESSAGE, NOT REPLY
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>Eugenio Diaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>[...]
>
>>>Because from the packager point of view, I don't know which sound daemon
>>>you will use, and the default uses OSS -> this doesn't work under Gnome
>>>and KDE for which their sound daemon sits on the dsp.
>>>
>>
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>Blue Lizard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>>
>>>you will use, and the default uses OSS -> this doesn't work under Gnome
>>>and KDE for which their sound daemon sits on the dsp.
>>
Alexander Skwar wrote:
>So sprach Jorg am Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 12:35:40PM -0400:
>
>>ghostscript 6.51 has been GPL'd and php 4.05 and apache 1.3.20 has been
>>out for some time now, why not in cooker?
>>
>
>Yeah, exactly - for *ME*, I could care less about some of the games and
>other packages t
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>
>you will use, and the default uses OSS -> this doesn't work under Gnome
>and KDE for which their sound daemon sits on the dsp.
>
>
since when is that true of gnome?
michael wrote:
>I have no scsi interface AFAIK, but when attempting to install today's
>cooker, (jungle.metalab.unc.edu 1700 GMT):
>Found imm, ppa scsi interfaces. Do you have another one?
>What does this mean?
>
hth should i know but if u dont and u do have an or many atapi drives
which were c
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
>Blue Lizard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
>>
>>>none kosher...
>>>
>>how?
>>
>
>in chiness food you have usually porc there :-(
>
>
of course, but never thought of pork in the mus
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
>
>none kosher...
>
how?
Rolf Pedersen wrote:
>Sylvain COTINEAU wrote:
>
>>Blue Lizard wrote:
>>
>>>Eaon wrote:
>>>
>>>>>Sylvain COTINEAU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Thierry Vignaud wrote:
>
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
>[Contrib-RPM]
>
>--=-=-=
>Name: ddd Relocations: (not relocateable)
>Version : 3.3.1 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
>
Yay my moz debugger interface is back and beautiful!
BTW isnt it mandrake linux now?
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>New rpm problem?
>>
>>[root@project RPMS]# rpm -Uvh perl-Data-DumpXML-1.01-1mdk.i586.rpm
>>Preparing...### [100%]
>> 1:perl-Data-DumpXML error: unpacking of ar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>I've never seen this behaviour before, and it may be Mandrake 8.0
>>related or just an accident of our combination of libraries and kernel
>>release.
>>
>>I have a program (qseeme 0.83a) that exists, file reports it as an ELF
>>32 executable, but any attempts to run
Alan Olsen wrote:
>On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Blue Lizard wrote:
>
>>>I do hope Mdk 8.1 comes out before october. I gave out tons of linux CD's
>>>last Halloween. Hehe
>>>
>>>Shal.
>>>
>>>
>>hmm
>>Jews are cheap right
>
>
>I do hope Mdk 8.1 comes out before october. I gave out tons of linux CD's
>last Halloween. Hehe
>
>Shal.
>
>
hmm
Jews are cheap right (I can say cuz i am)? So what better than free
software in a box next to the beany bin?
Eaon wrote:
>>Sylvain COTINEAU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>>Thierry Vignaud wrote:
>>>
[Contrib-RPM]
--=-=-=
Name: gcc3.0 Relocations: (not
>>relocateable)
>>
>>>Why in contrib ?
>>>
>>>BCNU,
>>>
>>Because the night.
>>
>
>10,000 Maniacs. How
Tim wrote:
>Just booted to windows after spending a few minutes trying to play around
>with grub but it's too late to do much more. I'll go back and get more
>information if other people can reproduce something similar, if they can't I
>guess it's just something I did.
>
>-Rsync from Sunsite
>-fl
Rui Barreiros wrote:
>
>is there a easy way of downgrading all packages to the stable version without
>formating the hd? i tried the install again but it doesn't force the package
>install.
>
>thx
>
get all of em in one place and rpm --U --oldpackage *
or whatever flags u like. rtfm, it's not
Peter Ruskin wrote:
>Boot failed: please change disks and press a key to continue.
>
WORKSFORME
Thierry Vignaud wrote:
>[Contrib-RPM]
>
>--=-=-=
>Name: gcc3.0 Relocations: (not relocateable)
>Version : 3.0 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
>
[...]
>
>- final release
>
damn right, how much testing are the mdksoft people gonna do before it
BTW add 1=/usr/bin/X11/X to your gdm.conf.
Forgot to mention that as what my point was
See the thing is that gdm is trying to run x a second time, over itself.
it then gives the message in vt8.
kdm and xdm have the xsession running 'over' themselves. The way the
command is written for gdm tries to start a new xserver but cant on an
already running one. If it tries to on 8 but
michael wrote:
>rpm -Uvh foo.rpm = segfault
>using the *Upgrade or *install: Installing
>"/cooker/Mandrake/RPMS/gcombust-0.1.45-2mdk.i586.rpm"
>/usr/lib/mc/extfs/rpm: line 2: 4702 Segmentation fault (core
>dumped) rpm -ivh "$1"
>I haven't checked all possible pkgs but the 10 or so I have
Funny, i couldnt get gdm to work second time before either...
But beside that, kdm does the same except instead of console error and
screen freeze, it just crashes X.
Call for a recomp., not by me, or someone who has tried that already.
Morten Poulsen wrote:
>Hello All!
>
>I seeem to have made a mess of my Mandrake 8.0 dist. with some
>rpm-4.0.3-packages from COoker. I segfault'et when you tried to do anything
>elsa but watch the --help. Trying to fix this I installed rpm-4.0.2 from the
>sources from www.rpm.org, but it comp
what the hell?
I just turned on the debug option in gdm.conf to see if it would get me
an informational message when it crashed but it didnt, i logged right in...
Sebastian Dransfeld wrote:
>On Sat, 16 Jun 2001, Blue Lizard wrote:
>
>>Sebastian Dransfeld wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, J . A . Magallon wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 20010614 Sebastian Dransfeld wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Is someone e
>
>- The freshly baked 1.7.7 aka 1.8.0pre1 is out for cooker users.
>
YAY!
Sebastian Dransfeld wrote:
>On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, J . A . Magallon wrote:
>
>>On 20010614 Sebastian Dransfeld wrote:
>>
>>>Is someone else having problems with gdm? When I log in gdm says it cannot
>>>start X server.
>>>
>>This happens to me also. After typing th password+, gdm gets stuck,
>>and I
mkisofs-1.14 pre's are required for full compatibility with the current
gcombust due to --.
very obvious and i not the first to notice or anything but im pretty
sure 1.13-7 is in cooker?
is there a patch in use on the 1.13-7 package i dont know about?
Randy Kramer wrote:
>Stefan (or the Linux-Mandrake Team),
>
>I wonder if you could note whether gcombust supports Disk At Once
>recording from the GUI (and also for other CD burning front ends)?
>
Cant change the description but yes, it does support dao for cd-cd or
iso-cd.
>
>
As with all things you must cover all the bases. hmm
As with all things you must cover all the databases. hmm
--rebuilddb?
Blue Lizard wrote:
> So I finally go back to fresh install after that gtk loop nonsense and
> my serial mouse dont work. Not the first time either...
> mirrors:
> carroll.cac.psu.edu
> jungle.metalab.unc.edu
> mouse:
> cirque (think it's a glidepoint)
> what ive t
So I finally go back to fresh install after that gtk loop nonsense and
my serial mouse dont work. Not the first time either...
mirrors:
carroll.cac.psu.edu
jungle.metalab.unc.edu
mouse:
cirque (think it's a glidepoint)
what ive tried:
modprobe serial
why it didnt work:
module isapnp not found an
Frederic Crozat wrote:
>Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Michael
>Reinsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
>>Hi!
>>
>>On Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:16:06 Frederic Crozat wrote:
>>
>>>Name: mozilla
>>>Version : 0.9.1
>>>Release : 2mdk
>>>- Patch12: fix problem with Galeon and Nautilus
michael wrote:
>Has the GTK loop which blocks cooker install been fixed or should I fix
>it by hand?
>
I asked that a little while ago to no result
Michael Reinsch wrote:
>Hi!
>
>On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 23:50:38 Blue Lizard wrote:
>
>>did u make sure to rebuild databases?
>>Not a sure fix, but you must cover all the bases, eh?
>>
>
>Thanks very much! That did it!
>
Well I'll be damned...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>David BAUDENS wrote:
>>
>>>--=-=-=
>>>Name: kdelibs Relocations: (not relocateable)
>>>Version : 2.2 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
>>>
>>I seem to recall a time once when some kde packages were NOT -strip-libs
>>'ed
David BAUDENS wrote:
>--=-=-=
>Name: kdelibs Relocations: (not relocateable)
>Version : 2.2 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
>
I seem to recall a time once when some kde packages were NOT -strip-libs
'ed (of course for debugging purposes only).
>
>Necko is the name of Networking library of Mozilla
>
/me on crack
>Summary : Gnome browser based on Gecko (Mozilla)
>Description :
>Gnome browser based on Gecko (Mozilla rendering engine)
>
Shouldn't gecko be replaced with necko?
That's what the rest of mozilla is doing...
michael wrote:
>Won't install. Same loop- same results.
>
Yes, yes, we all know.
The ever-generic 'Todays cooker' subject is getting a bit bothersome cuz
nobody knows what's inside.
Either separate ea. prob in a more specific thread or list the related
pkgs in subject or something but todays co
Michael Brown wrote:
>On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>
>>>unifying the storage of Pine, KMail, evolution and whatever other MUAs I
>>>
>>What do you mean by this? They all can use IMAP/POP3, can't they?
>>
>
>Mostly, yes. Most of them also use mbox format for storing mail locally,
Peter Ruskin wrote:
>Still no contrib at sunsite.uio.no::Mandrake-devel/
>
Needs to be fixed. Been working with a lot of mirror maintainers who
have chosen to mirror various, more complete, places other than uio as
instructed. Common candidates include proxad and wtfo.
>
>ftp.sunet.se::Mandr
>This will fix the problem.
>
>Francois.
>
So, eh, is this gonna be fixed on the mirrors soon? kinda want my
periodic fresh install to work.
:P-Sliver
Alexander Skwar wrote:
>So sprach Pixel am Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 02:49:04PM +0200:
>
>>5.6.1 is compatible with 5.6.0, so what is the pb?
>>
>
>Well, it looks ugly to have both /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0 and
>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1
>
>Alexander Skwar
>
Nice to know SOMEONE understands.
Pixel wrote:
>Hoyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>If your backup is on a remote machine, the Mandrake rescue disk is not useful.
>>
>>It needs:
>>
>>ssh, scp, rsh, rlogin, tar, cpio and lilo
>>
>>for it be more useful.
>>
>
>ooops, i don't think i answered you :-(
>i did tick your mail and will
Pixel wrote:
>Blue Lizard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>Would it be a good idea to change some of the older packages to comply with perl
>>561?
>>More specifically:
>>Move the files in site_perl/5.6.0 to site_perl/5.6.1?
>>
>
>5.6.1 is compat
Would it be a good idea to change some of the older packages to comply
with perl 561?
More specifically:
Move the files in site_perl/5.6.0 to site_perl/5.6.1?
This occurs in packages such as perl-DateManip:perl-DBIx:perl-DBI and
what not.
Another question:
Can we see a perl-DBD-Pg package in ma
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
>--=-=-=
>Name: e2fsprogsRelocations: (not relocateable)
>Version : 1.20 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
>Release : 1mdk Build Date: Fri Jun 8 18:07:42 2001
>Install date: (not installed)
Claudio wrote:
>Since last sane (that one included with 8.0) does NOT work with mustek and HP
>scanners, is it possible to have a 1.0.5-pre for testing?
>Thanks, C.
>
Ich glaube, es fixed a prob with HPOJPRO1150C.
Michèl Alexandre Salim wrote:
>Since I presume Mdk 8.1 should be out a bit before
>GNOME 2, would the latest GNOME 2 beta out at that
>time be included - oh ok, that is probably pushing it
>a bit, at least made available for download like the
>current KDE alphas :)
>
>Michel
>--- Claudio <[EMAIL
Michèl Alexandre Salim wrote:
>--- Blue Lizard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I
>suspected a lot of apps like this would be f*ed
>
>>when i chose to not
>>install gnome packs.
>>gtkhtml-ERROR **: gconf error: Configuration server
>>couldnt be contact
I suspected a lot of apps like this would be f*ed when i chose to not
install gnome packs.
gtkhtml-ERROR **: gconf error: Configuration server couldnt be contacted.
Hmm...maybe cuz gconf isnt installed?
gee, it shouldnt have let me install pan, or not install gconf, hmm,
someone's an idiot (pro
Michael Brown wrote:
>Is there any way to tell DrakX's auto-install mode to install LILO onto
>/dev/hda1 instead of /dev/hda ? I've looked through the code and the
>nearest option I can find seems to be
>
>$o -> {bootloader}{crushMbr}
>
>which, if set to 1, causes LILO to install onto /dev/hda b
so (SNF, freq, corpo) and some in Mandrake/iso (8.0) - but they
>are there.
>
>Eaon
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Blue Lizard
>>Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 5:15 PM
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>&g
>
>Hey Linus is on Fresh Air (an NPR show) this week (right now for me).
>
He was pushing his memoires or something on cnbc a while ago. Power Lunch.
The big guy at rpmfind got real mad and took off ALL isos cuz it took up
so much bandwidth. See the note he left in the directory. Dont think
he ever put em back up.
This was one day after i was downloading them both at same time
amounting to 600kbs.
Vincent Meyer wrote:
>Hi,
>
> New kernel is running fine here... is it me, or does it seem to come up
>faster than the previous kernel did?
>
> V.
>
>
cough hack
meant to tell you earlier but i definitely noticed the same thing...not
massive improvement but noticeable.
>
>
> If I remember it was in the 50's (and maybe the early 60's).
> Whichever it was, I was still living with my parents, so it was about
> then.
>
> David
>
>
>
Ladies and gentleman, what David doesnt want you to know is that he has
no idea, he still lives with his parents.
:)
David BAUDENS wrote:
>KOffice contains:
> * KWord: word processor
> * KSpread: spreadsheet
> * KPresenter: presentations
> * KChart: diagram generator
> * KIllustrator
> * Krayon
> * Kugar
> * Some filters (Excel 97, Winword 97/2000, etc.)
>
hmm...kivio
michael wrote:
>On Thursday 31 May 2001 14:03, you wrote:
>
>>Wow! The pblms I had with my cablemodem being activated at boot are gone.
>>In fact all of the errata I reported in my last cooker-install feedback
>>seem to have disappeared!
>>Install log indicates a pblm with perl (setting locale fa
1)U guys are too damn smart for me.
2)I think you should name this one after elven lord (was the name
gilgalad or something? he's my first choice. following that:not
obvious ones like elrond or aragorn, must be elven, or numenorian, or
best yet since mandrake is the highest of linux distribut
michael wrote:
>Even typing (please) didn't help. "Reboot" doesn't work either.
>I had to use the switch.
>
Already read ian's response but im not sure the nature or meaning of the
question. assuming sbin in path and YOU HAVE THE PERMISSIONS why u have
to flip any switches? no init 6? Could
Jürgen Zimmermann wrote:
>>Eh...Is aic7xxx in order and good to go?
>>
>
>At least on my 2 testmachines: yes...
>
>
Thank you both. Am currently passing patches back and forth with some
connections of mine and needed some confirmation that this would provide
good enough control variable/benchm
Renaud Chaillat wrote:
>--=-=-=
>Name: gcombust Relocations: (not relocateable)
>Version : 0.1.44Vendor: MandrakeSoft
>Release : 1mdk Build Date: Fri Jun 1 14:01:29 2001
>Install date: (not installed)
Hmm. Canada boy is making me hungry for either fried penguin or raw
fish...? His idea of having a general mirror of weekly isos or
something, Im not sure what, is nice. Kinda follows the philosophy
behind the kc-cooker(slightly behind sched. thanks to vox) that people
wanna be in the know or
Juan Quintela wrote:
>--=-=-=
>Name: kernel Relocations: (not relocateable)
>Version : 2.4.5 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
>Release : 1mdk Build Date: Thu May 31 03:39:44 2001
>
Eh...Is aic7xxx in order and good to
Spencer wrote:
>Stefan Hußfeldt wrote:
>
>>|[stefanh@kilroy stefanh]$ cdrecord -v dev=0,5,0 speed=4
>/mnt/backup/1-Cooker-i586.iso
>>|[...]
>>|Track 01: 656 of 671 MB written (fifo 100%).cdrecord: Input/output error.
>>|[...]
>>|[stefanh@kilroy stefanh]$ la /mnt/backup/?-Cooker*
>>|-rw-r--r--
hmm. I dont mind updating packages at all, I'm actually a compulsive
updater and MandrakeUpdate sits crontabbed. If crossfire includes
crossedit why dont crossfire and crossedit packs conflict?
-Crack He..I mean Blue
R.I.P. Deaddog wrote:
>
>You wanna make me push -3mdk and then call me SOB again!?
>
Gee, I was just kidding around. Didnt think you'd take so much offense :).
>I'll try to get the scriptfire working for next server pkg.
>
So you saying we will soon see crossfire-server? Since there are client
R.I.P. Deaddog wrote:
>The URL for this package is:
>
>ftp://ftp.linux-mandrake.com/incoming/crossfire-client-1.0.0-2mdk.src.rpm
>
>Ready for inspection, thanks a lot.
>
>Abel Cheung
>
>==
>Name: crossfire-client Relo
Just got a look at lopster (.9.9-2mdk) and, esp when comparing it to
gnapster, it kicks ass. Think you might should consider popping this
guy on into cooker (main). After all, this is the distro for linux
newbies and people switching from windows. Might be a considerate plus.
(ps been wonder
In attempt to test the perl scripts for kernel cousin, failed. Needs
files in dir Date in @INC which (the Date dir) doesn't exist. What in
the heck?
btw considered putting this under the 5.7 thread but decided not to.
This I believe does relate to development.
-Blue
Guillaume Rousse wrote:
>Just install a c++ compiler :-)
>What you need here is gcc-c++ package
>
No offense but you sound like a fool. It is installed and is recognized
by configure, it just can't make executable binaries despite claims of
other gcc3 testers.
Brian J. Murrell wrote:
>Just updated cooker and got the following trying to start galeon:
>
>$ galeon
>/usr/bin/galeon-bin: error while loading shared libraries:
>/usr/lib/libgdk_imlib.so.1: undefined symbol: png_create_read_struct
>
>$ rpm -qi galeon
>Name: galeon
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
>Blue Lizard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>Here's an extremely newbie question...how do I got configure and make
>>to use gcc-3.0 instead of gcc?
>>
>
>by default ?
>
>(chmou@giants)[~]-% sudo update-alternatives --config
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>Shalrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>On Saturday 26 May 2001 20:25, you wrote:
>>
>>>Don't push them, 2.4.5 is not final yet and we don't have a working
>>>2.4.4 yet...
>>>
>>>Steve
>>>
>>Speaking of which, my mandrake cooker system has a tendency to unload my
>>
when we gonna see it?
Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
>On Fri, 25 May 2001, Blue Lizard wrote:
>
>>when I ran gcc -v it said the version number and identifier from my
>>personal install of a non mdk rpm of it. This to me is an indication
>>that gcc is not provided by gcc-3.0 rpm?
>>
when I ran gcc -v it said the version number and identifier from my
personal install of a non mdk rpm of it. This to me is an indication
that gcc is not provided by gcc-3.0 rpm?
ps I did 'rpm -U --nodeps --replacepkgs' and the same. So either the
above is somehow true or u mistakenly put wron
Ladies and gentlemen, I'm goin' in. Will try to report on
success/failure when I get around. I hope to see an update in around a
month.
:)
Thank you for this coolness.
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>
>- recompile
>
Thank you, now I need not replace some libs.
Frederic Lepied wrote:
>[Contrib-RPM]
>
>--=-=-=
>Name: ctcs Relocations: (not relocateable)
>
Keep that thing away from me!
I'm sure kevin would like any help or testing he can get. Although the
idea is to get away from this secondary windows presence depend, it
still is a large point of hesitation for many. Here is an announcement
from May 14 that appeared on the site (plex86.org). It should be
converted to pla
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
>Would someone could be interessed to do a kernel cousins for cooker :
>
>http://kt.zork.net/index.html
>
>or a weekly summary would be great...
>
>
Gee, hope it gets sent this time.
Sure. Little guidance would still be nice. On that entire site, it
never says where to
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
>Would someone could be interessed to do a kernel cousins for cooker :
>
>http://kt.zork.net/index.html
>
>or a weekly summary would be great...
>
>
Would love to, with your guidance. I assume it means just sorta tell
people what patch changes we (actually you (the real
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
>"pablito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>is this one okay without a whole lot of fooling around with?
>>
>
>if you don't have aic7xxx and don't use extensively nfs it should be ok...
>
>
Woh, slow down there, if you do have aic7xxx?
Eaon wrote:
>Well, does the mating habits of the cheetah explain how the kernel has been
>changed recently? If so, then yes. Rather I think what we're looking for
>here is the mating habits of Antarctic flightless birds. Those would
>explain much.
>
>Eaon
>
That's right, everbody flame Chmou.
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
>SI Reasoning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>I notice that there is a change log section for each
>>rpm found within mandrake update...but I have never
>>seen anything written in them. It would be very
>>helpful to be able to read up on the changes before installing.
>>
>
Armisis Aieoln wrote:
>I agree.
>
>Dave
>
>On Tuesday 22 May 2001 19:38, you wrote:
>
>>michael wrote:
>>
>>>Groovy with me!
>>>
>>>Michael Brown wrote:
>>>
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Armisis Aieoln wrote:
>>>I think what he was talking about was... instead of
>>>going public with an i
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
>
>i can make one and put it on my homepage, but well just for testing
>there is no way at this stage of gcc3 to make the default kernel
>compiler.
>
Of course. I'm sure it will be a long time before something so drastic :)
Frederic Crozat wrote:
>Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Blue Lizard"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
>>Frederic Crozat wrote:
>>
>>>Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "michael"
>>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
Frederic Crozat wrote:
>Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "michael"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
>>mozilla segfaults immediately before opening.
>>
>
>run /usr/lib/mozilla/rebuild-databases.sh as root
>
And of that doesn't work?
(mandrake mozilla releases since the first .9 have always done
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
>
>the problem is that the gcc bugs are really hard to trigger, i remeber
>compiling all kernel with gcc2.95 until we saw a bug in the a scsci
>drivers that does timeout just because it was compiled with gcc2.95,
>so i stick to egcs..
>
If I (at a later date when it is tho
michael wrote:
>Groovy with me!
>
>Michael Brown wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 22 May 2001, Armisis Aieoln wrote:
>>
>I think what he was talking about was... instead of
>going public with an ipo, have mandrake be a
>user/developer owned company with the ability to buy
>into the company that
This came up in a reply I wrote to gwenole that never got sent (I hate
my isp).
Once upon a time, not too long ago, Chmouel made a remark about how he
did not feel comfortable building kernel packages with gcc and would
much rather stick to the rock solid (if old) egcs releases. I wondered
i
301 - 400 of 524 matches
Mail list logo
