Re: [Cooker] Is it possible to bundle XFS support?

2001-03-09 Thread r j
--- Michèl Alexandre Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- Eugenio Diaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- > > Ok, anyone that wants XFS in cooker raise your > > han..er keys! Several months ago > > we were asked what we wanted in cooker ... well, I > > want enterprise features, > > specifically X

Re: [Cooker] Why

2001-03-09 Thread r j
The packager. Usually the original packager specifies the 'Group' and it almost never gets changed. E.g., gtm, the dld mgr for Galeon and front end for wget was in X11/Utilities group by author and, hence, did not get put into Networking/FileTransfer with the rest of the dld mgrs. MDK changed i

Re: [Cooker] KDE support has been turned off.

2001-03-09 Thread r j
Hello: Thank you for reply David. This is passe but maybe needs just-a-little more attention.:) --- David BAUDENS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > r j écrivit : > > I was rebuilding qt2-2.2.4-3mdk.src.rpm and > > everything going OK until: > > "...Creating mak

Re: [Cooker] which package provides libreadline4?

2001-03-09 Thread r j
Did that(install); readline does not resolve the dependency for libreadline4 when building kdelibs. Is it 'kdelibs requires' packaging typo/error? Regards, rj Linux: Get it. Use it. Improve it. === --- Geoffrey Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 20

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 7.2 + 8.0 bloated and resource hog!

2001-03-08 Thread r j
--- Prana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hiya, > > Did you guys read the review in ActiveWin.com about Linux Mandrake > 7.2? > > Since last year I've been saying "Turn off services by default" for > more > than 10 times. Now I read a review in ActiveWin.com about LM 7.2 > being a > resource hog,

Re: [Cooker] DiskDrake during install

2001-03-07 Thread r j
--- Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So sprach John Allen am Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 10:16:44AM +: > > During installation there is no longer a /boot option in the mount > points > > drop down list. > > Hmm, when is a /boot actually needed? In former times it was needed > when / >

[Cooker] re-newbie-fy startup

2001-03-07 Thread r j
Hi: Dunno who to send this to, so just tossing it in the pot. It seems that upon an improper shutdown(power failure, this case) of a running system(LM 7.1 in the reported case) the system is unable to recover upon restart and properly write .Xauthority. The user gets ''Xauth .Xauthority not wri

Re: [Cooker] gcc-2.96

2001-03-07 Thread r j
--- Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mattias Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > [...] > > > I must say that this issue that you think it nothing to care about > > is the stability of all the programs included in the distribution. > > They know it's unstable since they

Re: [Cooker] Is it possible to bundle XFS support?

2001-03-07 Thread r j
--- "R.I.P. Deaddog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, if you have time, perhaps you can make a source RPM and put it > into > contrib to benefit others for now? I saw that a 2.4 kernel with > crypto > patch was already there. Probably those developers will reconsider Is that 'the' crypto pat

Re: [Cooker] Mozilla bloat (was: nVidia/Netscape)

2001-03-06 Thread r j
--- Frederic Crozat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "r j" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > > > Man, me too! Mozilla is sooo much better now but it would be so > sweet to > > have a browser that wa

Re: [Cooker] apt-get

2001-03-04 Thread r j
--- Vincent Danen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun Mar 04, 2001 at 02:30:23PM -0800, r j wrote: > > > Yea, rpmfind has not updated in 5+ mo. Actually there is a recent > > snapshot of conectiva SRPMS from ftp.debian.org with > > apt-0.3.19cnc37-1cl.src.rp

Re: [Cooker] Archives?

2001-03-04 Thread r j
--- Peter Ruskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 01 January 1970 01:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi again. It seems I hadn't confirmed my subscription to the > cooker-list > > when I sent my question regarding the ALSA sounddriver project so I > never > > got your answer. I have sinc

Re: [Cooker] apt-get

2001-03-04 Thread r j
--- Joakim Bodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > andre wrote: > > >> > ftp://ftp.rpmfind.net/linux/conectiva/EXPERIMENTAL/apt/apt-0.3.19cnc9-1cl.src.rpm > >> A port of Debian's apt tools for RPM based distributions. > >> Or at least for Conectiva. > >> Under development, use at your own risk!!! > >

Re: [Cooker] apt-get

2001-03-04 Thread r j
ftp://ftp.rpmfind.net/linux/conectiva/EXPERIMENTAL/apt/apt-0.3.19cnc9-1cl.src.rpm A port of Debian's apt tools for RPM based distributions. Or at least for Conectiva. Under development, use at your own risk!!! No updates made for ~ 6mo! It either works good or is very broken. Build it and _exper

Re: [Cooker] apmd??

2001-03-04 Thread r j
--- civileme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 04 March 2001 13:04, you wrote: > > --- civileme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Saturday 03 March 2001 20:24, you wrote: > > > > On Saturday 03 March 2001 11:52, Alexander Skwar wrote: > > > > > So sprach Ray am Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 09:14:03

Re: [Cooker] bashprompts

2001-03-04 Thread r j
--- Shalrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greetings. I recently began toying around with my bash prompt and > color, > going from the information found here: > > http://www2.linuxjournal.com/lj-issues/issue64/3215.html > > I would like to edit /etc/bashrc in such a way that root's bash > pro

Re: [Cooker] All: *new* mirrors & cookerdevel page

2001-03-04 Thread r j
--- Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So sprach r j am Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 12:31:36AM -0800: > > Thanks and, well, since you said please...I guess we can try.:) > > The URL would be nice to have. > > > > rsync:// ??? sunsite.uio.no ??? &

[Cooker] apmd??

2001-03-04 Thread r j
--- civileme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 03 March 2001 20:24, you wrote: > > On Saturday 03 March 2001 11:52, Alexander Skwar wrote: > > > So sprach Ray am Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 09:14:03AM +: > > > > What is the best way to upgrade 7.2 to KDE 2.1? > > > > which oreder to install t

Re: [Cooker] telnet/ftp (was: pop3s)

2001-03-04 Thread r j
--- Leon Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > zwh wrote: > > > There are some problems harry to me! snip > > -- > Life would be much easier if I had the source code. http://www.sciencemag.org/content/vol291/issue5507/ It's a start.:) __

Re: [Cooker] Mozilla bloat (was: nVidia/Netscape)

2001-03-03 Thread r j
--- Leon Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Steve Wray wrote: > > > And mozilla is very close to bloatware already... > > and its not even finished yet! > > Unlike most bloated projects, most of that bloat actually does > something > useful. What I would like to see in Mozilla is a kernel

Re: [Cooker] KDE support has been turned off.

2001-03-03 Thread r j
-and-egg problem > too. Not only one package is problematic. But seems nobody cares, or > too > busy to care. > > As a temporary fix, how about installing a binary first, then compile > source RPM again? > > Abel Cheung > > > On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, r j wrote: > > &

Re: [Cooker] 8.0 Beta slow/vasting cpu time

2001-03-02 Thread r j
--- Sebastian Dransfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, W.Kasberg wrote: > > > My impression is that 8.0 beta is slow (compared to 7.2). CPU > > monitor show continously 100 %. > > What could be the reason? Is this only on my PC (700MHz, 512 MB)? > > You have a process called '

Re: [Cooker] howtos-7.1

2001-03-02 Thread r j
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Why have all the howto's such an old name, 7.1, and why are they some > so old. It isn't really hard to "build" a new one. I can even do it. > see howto-html-nl in incoming I don't know how but it sounds like you do. So why don't you contact the packager, and then

Re: [Cooker] Contribution

2001-03-02 Thread r j
t Day! rj == --- Alexander Feigl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 28 Feb 2001 11:37:40 -0800, r j wrote: > > Hi: > > > > SNIP > > > > I suggest to try sending to contibutions manager, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] , again, and

[Cooker] KDE support has been turned off.

2001-03-02 Thread r j
Hi: Still waiting for dld to complete so I thought I'd give KDE2.1 build a shot. I was rebuilding qt2-2.2.4-3mdk.src.rpm and everything going OK until: "... Creating makefiles... You wanted to compile the Qt Designer with KDE2 support, but $KDEDIR does not point to a valid KDE2 installation. KD

Re: [Cooker] SUB cooker

2001-03-02 Thread r j
Hi Matt: I am trying to find out where people are getting the info that makes them send SUB cooker to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Would you please tell me where you got this info? That page reference and/or instruction needs to be changed. The correct way to subscribe to cooker is by sending an email to

Re: [Cooker] All: *new* mirrors & cookerdevel page

2001-03-02 Thread r j
Thanks and, well, since you said please...I guess we can try.:) The URL would be nice to have. rsync:// ??? sunsite.uio.no ??? Got any more? Especially in USA: only 6 is odd for such a big country. There MUST be some more... just have not found them yet. AND, WTH is Canada? I thought M'Soft h

Re: [Cooker] KDE 2.1 -- Where is qt2-devel-2.2.4-3?

2001-02-28 Thread r j
umm, rpm --rebuild qt2-2.2.4-3mdk.src.rpm think will provide both. You need libmng to build. Need $KDEDIR too, else: "You wanted to compile the Qt Designer with KDE2 support, but $KDEDIR does not point to a valid KDE2 installation. KDE support has been turned off." HTH rj

Re: [Cooker] All: *new* mirrors & cookerdevel page

2001-02-27 Thread r j
--- Michael Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, r j wrote: > > Hi all: > > I modified and submitted a new cookerdevel.php3 page for all to > use. > > The mirror sites have been updated -many new ones- and organized > by > > location

Re: [Cooker] All: *new* mirrors & cookerdevel page

2001-02-27 Thread r j
--- Spencer wrote: > Michael Brown wrote: > > > > > While you're at it, the - mkcd.pl - script needs to be updated to > version 0.1.8. > > --- > Spence > > > On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, r j wrote: > > > Hi all: > > > I modified and s

RE: [Cooker] All: *new* mirrors & cookerdevel page

2001-02-26 Thread r j
IL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Stodden > > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 5:37 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [Cooker] All: *new* mirrors & cookerdevel page > > > > > > r j wrote: > > > > > > Hi all: > > > >

Re: [Cooker] All: *new* mirrors & cookerdevel page

2001-02-26 Thread r j
OK. Thanks. Will let them know. FYI: The links are still there - just commented out and will not show but can be reached with right-click/view source. HAGD! rj --- Ron Stodden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > r j wrote: > > > > Hi all: &g

[Cooker] All: *new* mirrors & cookerdevel page

2001-02-26 Thread r j
Hi all: I modified and submitted a new cookerdevel.php3 page for all to use. The mirror sites have been updated -many new ones- and organized by location(CoO). Alix and Frederic have dutifully posted the info for you. Please review: http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/cookerdevel.new.php3 . The

Re: [Cooker] Hi! (new member)

2001-02-26 Thread r j
Hey Juanma: Not my place but since nobody else said it: Welcome!! Goto http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/cookerdevel.new.php3 and follow instructions...Sorry not in Spanish yet but that would be a really nice thing to have(hint :). There are many links and instructions on that page that can

Re: [Cooker] Cooker Mirrors

2001-02-23 Thread r j
This is a good question considering this : http://www.mandrakeforum.com/article.php3?sid=2927090040 and NeoGnomIC's response of "...tried to help you. I gave you guys this list of 27 FTP URLS (20 different locations )that have space for the ISOs but don't have them at their sites. I think?

[Cooker] gcc pre3.0

2001-02-23 Thread r j
Hi: Has anyone tried the pre3.0 snapshots from the gcc-3_0-branch with cooker? What result? It would seem that gcc pre3.0 should be in cooker somewhere but I cannot find it. After all, this is ''Cooker''= future of linux, bleeding edge... These folks, http://www.codesourcery.com/gcc-snap

Re: [Cooker] personal iso-image howto?

2001-02-23 Thread r j
Hi y'all: I have to third this. Even if I get cooker ISO when it's beta, by the time I get it and look at it, there's a new beta and the process has to start all over again. I tried last time; It does not work with 56k modem.:( Well, it does not work good enough at ~4kBps. I would like to help

Re: [Cooker] Annoying groups added to system

2001-02-23 Thread r j
Thanks for the clarification... I feel better already.:) However, I have never used msec (not directly, anyway) but have these, too. rj Linux: Get it. Use it. Improve it. --- Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2001.02.23 22:32:13 +0400 Don

Re: [Cooker] Annoying groups added to system

2001-02-23 Thread r j
--- Don Head <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since I'm in a posting mood, I'm going to list another > minor annoyance/pet peeve thing. > > There's 4 groups on my system, not added by me, that are > GID 500 or greater. 500 and up is my user GID space. I > usually move 500+ and up from /etc/group a

Re: [Cooker] wating to help

2001-02-22 Thread r j
--- jorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I do get to do translations for kde :) what's pbs http://i18n.kde.org pbs=problems ;ask KDE Have you read: http://www.linux-mandrake.com/pt/ ? This page needs to be translated to Portuguese, too: http://www.linux-mandrake.com/pt/l10n.php3 . Write t

Re: [Cooker] Kernel 2.2.18 for mandrake 7.2 ?

2001-02-22 Thread r j
Hello: The Mandrake Security 'cookfire' distr uses kernel 2.2.18, albeit compiled for i386. There is a source RPM that you can use to rebuild for your arch. kernel-2.2.18-1mdk.src.rpm can be found on the mirrors that contain 'cookfire' SRPMS(of course). It might work for you-dunno. Check the l

[Cooker] Linus Torvalds: Linux-2.4.2

2001-02-21 Thread r j
Subject: Linux-2.4.2 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 18:19:43 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Kernel Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ok, the patch looks huge (it's a meg and a half compressed, 6+ megs uncompressed), but most of the patch by far is S/390 updates and the new Cris

Re: [Cooker] wating to help

2001-02-21 Thread r j
--- jorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 20 February 2001 10:17, you wrote: > > > my girlfriend is french You lucky dawg!;) Ya know, my wife was French,...err, that should be my EX-wife IS French. :) > > still any ideas :) -translation? -testing on multiple platforms? -asking fr

[Cooker] imlib-1.9.9.src rebuild fails... tar 'j' option?

2001-02-19 Thread r j
Yo GL: Attempt to rpm --rebuild imlib-1.9.9-1mdk.src.rpm yields: Installing imlib-1.9.9-1mdk.src.rpm ... make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/imlib-1.9.9' + tar jxvf /usr/src/RPM/SOURCES/imlib-pofiles.tar.bz2 tar: invalid option -- j Try `tar --help' for more information. Bad

Re: [Cooker] MandrakeCampus & MandrakeExpert survey + discussion

2001-02-12 Thread r j
Hey Doc: The fonts remain SMALL, here; Don't know how others get HUGE fonts. This must be a bug with PHP Nuke. The testforum is the *only* site that 'locks' the font size and it's the only site that I frequent that uses PHP Nuke(AFAIK). BTW, changing the theme will change some of the fonts and

Re: [Cooker] Watch your FTPs

2001-02-08 Thread r j
--- Michal Rokos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > I sent a few (2) mails to cooker maillist and today some guys I doubt that 'cooker' had anything to do with that. I get hit -probed- several times a day but very rarely post here. Portsentry catches them all. I hope so, anyway. fr

Re: [Cooker] problem with XFree 4.0.2 -Thnx

2000-12-24 Thread r j
Ahhh. Thanks. :-) Merry Christmas! rj == --- Antony Suter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > r j wrote: > > > > The new config file for 4.0.2 is XF86Config. Unfortunately, and > don't > > ask why cau

Re: [Cooker] problem with XFree 4.0.2

2000-12-23 Thread r j
The new config file for 4.0.2 is XF86Config. Unfortunately, and don't ask why cause i don't know yet, X is using the XF86Config-4 file when it starts. Apparently the font path unix/:-1 is no longer acceptable.???smh??? Create a new XF86Config with xf86config from the console, backup the XF86Conf

Re: [Cooker] mkisofs

2000-12-13 Thread r j
QQ: Well it certainly helped me. Thanks. If you are alluding to the fact that this millenium ends in ~18days & a few hours( http://www.usno.navy.mil/millennium/CountDown3.shtml ), I don't think there is much chance of an "update" to the sites... But who knows for sure - maybe?!? Have A Great D

Re: [Cooker] last KDE2 rpm (from KDE_UPDATE) rpms version number

2000-11-26 Thread r j
kpackage does the same thing on my sys. It 'thinks' that kdebase-2.0-20.1mdk is a newer version than kdebase-2.0.1-.1mdk, which we know is false. MandrakeUpdate gets it right, so I use it and just check to see if there are any new files by inspecting the ftp dir files. rj +

Re: [Cooker] KDE2_UPDATE observations [was:Fwd: Re: GNOME, KDE and Mandrakesoft (fwd)]

2000-11-26 Thread r j
crap would actually install. So be it. Have A Great Day! rj [AR] ++++++ --- Ron Stodden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > r j wrote: > > > * rigamarow was loosely defined by my mother once as a description > of > > something si

Re: [Cooker] Extemely strange K menu and menu editor behaviour

2000-11-25 Thread r j
--- OS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > KDE 2.1 is better than 2 but the K menu still behaves very oddly. > > All the KDE application are listed twice. All other apps. (gnome, X > apps. > etc.) are fine. > > When the apps. are listed twice the KDE Control Centre loads but is > empty. >

RE: [Cooker] KDE2_UPDATE observations [was:Fwd: Re: GNOME, KDE and Mandrakesoft (fwd)]

2000-11-25 Thread r j
*** > > Next tab is "Wallpaper" > Set "Mode" to "No Wallpaper" > > *NOW* you can press "Ok" > and you *should* have xearth in the root window! > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >

[Cooker] KDE2_UPDATE observations [was:Fwd: Re: GNOME, KDE and Mandrakesoft (fwd)]

2000-11-24 Thread r j
Hey CM, These are all cursory observations running as root. No program was looked at in depth. If the text looks messed up, it is because I used kjots to make notes and the font is so tiny I couldn't read it very good. I'm a lousy typist and it does not 'wrap'. klyx will not display LaTex docs;

Re: [Cooker] Fwd: Re: GNOME, KDE and Mandrakesoft (fwd)

2000-11-23 Thread r j
--- Christopher Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For all of you who have a long weekend, here is something to play > with - a > QT2 and a KDE update: (Someone PLEASE let me know they where able to > properly install): ... > -Chris Hey CM: All installed except for kdepim which requires pil

Re: [Cooker] Fwd: Re: GNOME, KDE and Mandrakesoft (fwd)

2000-11-23 Thread r j
--- Christopher Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For all of you who have a long weekend, here is something to play > with - a > QT2 and a KDE update: (Someone PLEASE let me know they where able to > properly install): ... > -Chris Hey CM: All installed except for kdepim which requires pil

Re: [Cooker] KDE_UPDATE for kdepim needs libpisock ?

2000-11-23 Thread r j
Ok, I have libical. libical provides, well, libical - not libpisock.so.3. kdepim-2.0.1-1mdk depends on libpisock.so.3(among others) and it will not install (properly) without it. libpisock is only avaiable(as far as I can tell) by installing the palm pilot package named pilot-link. Has the purpo

Re: [Cooker] Cooker page hopelessly out of date

2000-11-22 Thread r j
The download page list: http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/ftp.php3 has just been updated. Many of those have 'cooker' too if you're hungry and wanna eat now. I suspect the cooker list is next to be updated. There is also http://ftpsearch.lycos.com/cgi-bin/search?form=medium&query=coo

Re:[Cooker] KDE_UPDATE for kdepim needs libpisock ?

2000-11-22 Thread r j
Thanks for checking Meir; kinda figured it had to be a pilot file. Should not be tho. Should it, Chris? While the improvements have made KDE usable on my sys ( and I thank you very! much!) there are a few problems. Do you want the list here, in cooker, or directly to you? Should I/we post bug

Re: [Cooker] Kdevelop just crashes.

2000-11-22 Thread r j
Hey: No, and kdevelop-2.0-4mdk and -4.3mdk do the same. I was trying to run kdevelop --setup and I get this for both the -4mdk and 4.3mdk versions: "Invalid Memory Reference" ; and the backtrace is: (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... ... (no debugging symbols found)..

Re: [Cooker] problem with rpm and kdebase-2.0-18mdk

2000-11-21 Thread r j
Both kdebase and kdelibs would NOT install using MandrakeUpdate on my sys to update to v -20 & v -17.2, respectively,(no core dumps though) so I downloaded them (with ncftp binary get) and used kpackage to install. They installed w/o a hitch and 'appear' to be working quite nicely. So far, so goo

[Cooker] KDE_UPDATE for kdepim needs libpisock ?

2000-11-21 Thread r j
Hey Chris: The Updates are looking better all the time.:-) However, there seems to be one stickler: kdepim-2.0-7.1 requires libpisock.so.3 which is not available on my sys. The previous KDE2updates also required this although the original kdepim-2.0-1 does not. The only files that have been r

Re: [Cooker] KDE 2 CVS Update RPMS

2000-11-19 Thread r j
This is just a quick thanks. Doesn't look like you broke anything with the KDE2 updates.:-) I can give more details later but for now, thanks for the hard work. rj --- Christopher Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 18 November 2000 17:55, you wrote: > > On Saturday 18 November 200

[Cooker] Konquerer killer bug in LM7.2

2000-11-10 Thread r j
Hi2all: I've been cutting class so maybe somebody else found this and killed it. I would like to know b/4 posting a bug report. Summary: Konquerer locks up the system whenever Netscape bookmarks are attempted to be viewed from the menu item in Konquerer. Only part of the keyboard and mouse funct

[Cooker] Linux-Mandrake Odyssey-i586 20001027 15:20

2000-10-27 Thread r j
Version info in subject. Can't find any ISOs yet but 7.2 is available. Need I say more? I'm trying to free your mind, Neo. But I can only show you the door. You're the one that has to walk through it. -Morpheus, The Matrix = Have A Great Day! Regards, rj .lll .°¿° . ~

Re: [Cooker] Re: 7.2 RC2 ?

2000-10-26 Thread r j
--- Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Claudio a écrit : > > I'm another Mandrakeuser... and I think it's really a good idea: > it'd be > > better to wait 10 more days (with another RC) than have the final > 7.2 with > > some bug! We could test install (for my raid...), new (and final)

Re: [Cooker] 7.2 RC2 ?

2000-10-25 Thread r j
--- Burkhard Zombronner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 25. Oktober 2000 19:49 schrieben Sie: > > Hiyall, > > It looks like 7.2 is mostly finished. As soon as the mirrors catch > up > > all the newest KDE2, etc.. will be available. > > I am wondering if MS is going to make a pair of RC2

[Cooker] 7.2 RC2 ?

2000-10-25 Thread r j
Hiyall, It looks like 7.2 is mostly finished. As soon as the mirrors catch up all the newest KDE2, etc.. will be available. I am wondering if MS is going to make a pair of RC2 ISOs with the latest and greatest install for us to test. It would seem the prudent thing to do considering the number o