-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I few years ago I needed postfix with mysql support. postfix in
mandrake didn't have it. I downloaded srpm and found that mysql was in
but switch in spec file wasn't activated. It took quite a while for a
new package to
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 04:58:55PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
It seems it is possible to build postfix with dynamic support for
mysql/postgres/ldap, see the patch Debian uses:
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/p/postfix/postfix_2.0.16-2.diff.gz
(or newer I guess).
that's looks like the
Luca Berra, care to look at this?
LB Feeling very masochistic i could try to extract this from debian patch,
LB or i could try to adapt the one trustix ppl kindly extracted from there :)
LB will let u know...
Could you CC that to me also, since i often miss things from changelog list?
btw if this
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 11:04:04PM +0100, Galileo wrote:
Luca Berra, care to look at this?
LB Feeling very masochistic i could try to extract this from debian patch,
LB or i could try to adapt the one trustix ppl kindly extracted from there :)
LB will let u know...
Could you CC that to me also,
LB if i manage to do something, i will post on cooker list,
LB and put rpm on http://www.comedia.it/cooker/mail/
Thanks.
Galileo wrote:
For example find a message with a subject:
or [Cooker] Lilo Installation bug
...
I haven't had the time to test this with 9.2 but i bet that this
wasn't fixed.
well, if you want to know if something has been fixed or not file a bug
on bugzilla.
Haven't had a single reply. This
LB well, if you insist i'll just state it works correctly for me.
LB but if you try and give some more useful info (eg output of commands)
LB we could see if it is a bug or another problem.
Well this was with 9.1 haven't had the time to test it with 9.2.
Anyway the situation was something like
LB the second is phrased in a way i cannot understand
Simple lvm is not functioning properly when setup on top of raid1.
LB libraries, and they won't run if mysql libraries are not installed.
didn't know that it worked that way. Thanks.
LB maybe if you tried the patch before, you could also
Galileo wrote:
LB the second is phrased in a way i cannot understand
Simple lvm is not functioning properly when setup on top of raid1.
well, if you insist i'll just state it works correctly for me.
but if you try and give some more useful info (eg output of commands)
we could see if it is a
bccz Maybe you have an old page cached, but at least all the NVidia
kernel bccz packages have been updated. I hope the ATI and winmodem
drivers could also I know how to check for a page in cache. It wasn't
it.
bccz BTW, this is better than 9.1, where Mandrakesoft did not update
any of the
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Greg Meyer wrote:
On Friday 24 October 2003 01:20 pm, Brook Humphrey wrote:
On this page
http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/advisories/advisory.php?name=MDKA-2003:0
20
Mandrake says that all of the mandrakeclub commercial drivers are
available.
Quote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well if you haven't seen it a loot of others have.
But that doesn't help fix it. Mandrakesoft has
problems reproducing it too
(and 'just install a package' isn't a reproducible
test case), so it's
difficult for them to solve it.
Hope this helps: steps to
JC rpm -qa gpg-pubkey*
JC gpg-pubkey-22458a98-3969e7de
JC gpg-pubkey-9b4a4024-3874ddfb
JC gpg-pubkey-70771ff3-3c8f768f
JC The first key is the one you are missing.
Beats me. I will try to delete all of the keys then add the one from
isos and the other from mandrakes site.
What I don't understand
bccz Development is totally open. If you want to help, you can. There is no
bccz need to ask for developers, because the policy is clear. Volunteers are
bccz welcome and always have been.
???
Don't have to ask developers ? If I want something to be changed in ML
i will post a message to cooker
bccz Development is totally open. If you want to help, you can. There
is no bccz need to ask for developers, because the policy is clear.
Volunteers are bccz welcome and always have been.
???
Don't have to ask developers ? If I want something to be changed in ML i
will post a message to
bccz Sometimes it is more effective to post a patch, and/or file a bug.
bccz Sometimes not.
Well i can't post a patch since I'm not really a coder. I can find my
way around C, perl, php but nothing special.
This sometimes bothers me greatly.
bccz But you seem to infer that only Mandrakesoft
All of the updates for 9.2 have an invalid gpg signature
For example :
rpm --checksig kernel-2.4.22.18mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm
returns :
kernel-2.4.22.18mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm: sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS:
GPG#22458a98)
i even imported gpg key from https://www.mandrakesecure.net/RPM-GPG-KEYS
On Friday 24 October 2003 09:55 am, Galileo wrote:
All of the updates for 9.2 have an invalid gpg signature
For example :
rpm --checksig kernel-2.4.22.18mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm
returns :
kernel-2.4.22.18mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm: sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS:
GPG#22458a98) i even imported gpg
On Friday 24 October 2003 01:20 pm, Brook Humphrey wrote:
On this page
http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/advisories/advisory.php?name=MDKA-2003:0
20
Mandrake says that all of the mandrakeclub commercial drivers are
available.
Quote:
New commercial drivers for this kernel are
BH um they are. Maybe you didn't look right at the top of the page but listed
BH right there are drivers for ati, nvidia, winmodems and whatnot else.
Let see:
http://rpms.mandrakeclub.com/rpms/MandrakeClub/comm/9.2/i586/NVIDIA_kernel-2.4.22.10mdk-4496-2mdk.i586.html
kernel-2.4.22.10mdk
this is
On Friday 24 October 2003 10:52 am, Galileo wrote:
kernel-2.4.22.10mdk
this is the old kernel, new is 18
So no new drivers.
It doesn't matter to me really but it if you read on one page that they
should be there then they should be there.
ok I understand now
BH um yes this does happen but
Next :
On this page
http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/advisories/advisory.php?name=MDKA-2003:020
Mandrake says that all of the mandrakeclub commercial drivers are
available.
Quote:
New commercial drivers for this kernel are available at Mandrake
Club.
Now my English is a bit rusty but
On Fri Oct 24, 2003 at 07:18:30PM +, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 18:55:27 +0200
From: Galileo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Cooker] 9.2 Updates a total mess
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer
On Friday 24 October 2003 03:48 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most people are just clueless, and run Redhat because everyone else does,
Debian because they think they don't need newer software releases, or
Gentoo because they think that cool compile flags will really make their
firewall run
VD How did you import the key? Did you do it using gpg?
rpm --import RPM-GPG-KEYS from : https://www.mandrakesecure.net/RPM-GPG-KEYS
VD If so, then you really need to learn how to use urpmi. urpmi will import
VD the key for you. You also need to use rpm to import the key since rpm
VD manages
On Friday 24 October 2003 04:19 pm, Vincent Danen wrote:
The nvidia rpms should be up by now or very shortly... waiting on the Club
webmaster for that. The ATI ones will be up as soon as I obtain the srpms.
Are we going to see the club_com_i586_9.2 hdlist updated so these will be
available in
bccz Maybe you have an old page cached, but at least all the NVidia kernel
bccz packages have been updated. I hope the ATI and winmodem drivers could also
I know how to check for a page in cache. It wasn't it.
bccz BTW, this is better than 9.1, where Mandrakesoft did not update any of the
bccz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Galileo wrote:
| rpm --checksig
/Install/Mandrake/Update/kernel-2.4.22.18mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm
| /Install/Mandrake/Update/kernel-2.4.22.18mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm: sha1 md5
(GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#22458a98)
|
| rpm -qa gpg-pubkey*
|
28 matches
Mail list logo
