Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-11-05 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 12:02, Vedran Ljubovic wrote: --- Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, just accept the username and password, and show some moving graphics until you have authenticated the user. Ever noticed how long it takes to tell you your password is wrong on first

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-11-02 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- FACORAT Fabrice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: put them at the end after dm start Wouldn't work, because dm service just calls prefdm with a fork, so it's effectively executing X and KDE and everything else in parallel. As I've said, this makes X start veeery slowly. When I remove the fork, the

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-11-01 Thread OS
I lost where this particular thread came in, especially since I posted a message titled Boot Linux Faster. So at the risk of being repetitive here it is again, since the article seems to address some of the concerns being raised here: Date: 24/08/2003 3:06 pm Hello, I don't know if any one

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-30 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- Jos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.stack.nl/~josh/Mandrake Hello Jos! I think you have an excellent page there. Here are some thinkings: - Harddrake should *not* be disabled by default. If one changes some piece of hardware (they'll probably do that while their system is off :)

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-30 Thread Jos Hulzink
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Vedran Ljubovic wrote: --- Jos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.stack.nl/~josh/Mandrake Hello Jos! I think you have an excellent page there. Here are some thinkings: - Harddrake should *not* be disabled by default. If one changes some piece of hardware (they'll

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-30 Thread Michael Lothian
Would it be possible to have a desktop pc option at install where all prioritories are for a desktop user Make the gui no 1 prioritory at boot time Only load services when they're needed (or after gui is up) I think that's what WinXP does. Mike

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-30 Thread FACORAT Fabrice
Le jeu 30/10/2003 à 12:01, Jos Hulzink a écrit : On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Vedran Ljubovic wrote: Here are some thinkings: - Harddrake should *not* be disabled by default. If one changes some piece of hardware (they'll probably do that while their system is off :) strange things may happen

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-30 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Lothian wrote: Would it be possible to have a desktop pc option at install where all prioritories are for a desktop user Make the gui no 1 prioritory at boot time Only load services when they're needed (or after gui is up) I think

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-30 Thread Jos Hulzink
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Michael Lothian wrote: Would it be possible to have a desktop pc option at install where all prioritories are for a desktop user Make the gui no 1 prioritory at boot time Only load services when they're needed (or after gui is up) I think that's what WinXP does.

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-30 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jos Hulzink wrote: On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Michael Lothian wrote: Would it be possible to have a desktop pc option at install where all prioritories are for a desktop user Make the gui no 1 prioritory at boot time Only load services when they're

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-30 Thread Frank Griffin
Buchan Milne wrote: Only load services when they're needed (or after gui is up) I think that's what WinXP does. It's not that simple. For me to be able to log in (on my desktop in a LAN), I need at least NFS (ie portmap, nfslock) and autofs up and running. For a disconnected LDAP setup (see

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-30 Thread BLINDAUER Emmanuel
Le Mercredi 29 Octobre 2003 00:41, Han Boetes a écrit : S01xfs S02dm S03iptables S09network Yes but dm needs networking at the least. This solution may work for you but mandrake has to have sane defaults for everyone. Which is the general problem with suggestions. Most people only

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-30 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
Hello, I agree with most of your points. --- Jos Hulzink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Vedran Ljubovic wrote: - I don't think parallelizing helps on computers with a single CPU that doesn't support hyperthreading. Sure Not true I think... Think about initializing

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-30 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, just accept the username and password, and show some moving graphics until you have authenticated the user. Ever noticed how long it takes to tell you your password is wrong on first start? Couldn't we just hack the bootsplash so that it

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-30 Thread Marco Romeny
BLINDAUER Emmanuel wrote: Le Mercredi 29 Octobre 2003 00:41, Han Boetes a écrit : S01xfs S02dm S03iptables S09network Yes but dm needs networking at the least. This solution may work for you but mandrake has to have sane defaults for everyone. Which is the general problem with suggestions. Most

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-30 Thread FACORAT Fabrice
Le jeu 30/10/2003 à 17:01, Vedran Ljubovic a écrit : --- Jos Hulzink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also shared printers can be set up after the desktop is there, though indeed, for real servers you might want to change priority. My problem is how to do implement your suggestions (which I

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-30 Thread Han Boetes
Vedran Ljubovic wrote: - I also agree that using bash slows down things. Time it. You're making conclusions based on assumptions. But I don't think that writing rc script itself in C will help much. rc script is only a small portion of overhead, I think that the bigger problem are scripts

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 19:41, Han Boetes wrote: mayor problem since linux is not a reboot OS. Well. It's certainly designed to be capable of running more or less perpetually, that's true. That doesn't mean that's how people use it, though. I boot my system at a minimum once a day, because I

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-30 Thread Han Boetes
Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 19:41, Han Boetes wrote: mayor problem since linux is not a reboot OS. ^^^ please quote carefully. This hardly reflects what I said. Well. It's certainly designed to be capable of running more or less perpetually, that's true. That doesn't

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-30 Thread guran
Is it possible to use swsusp as a regular halt-susp to get around the need of everyone who thinks that the next second is important. Otherwise I think that Linux or Unix has other walues than a fast start. regards guran -- Mandrake Linux 9.2 kernel-2.4.22.21mdk-1-1mdk Only in a society that

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 22:29, Han Boetes wrote: Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 19:41, Han Boetes wrote: mayor problem since linux is not a reboot OS. ^^^ please quote carefully. This hardly reflects what I said. Uh? It's exactly what you said. You argued that bootup

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-30 Thread Han Boetes
Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 22:29, Han Boetes wrote: Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 19:41, Han Boetes wrote: mayor problem since linux is not a reboot OS. ^^^ please quote carefully. This hardly reflects what I said. Uh? It's exactly what

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-30 Thread Jos
On Thursday 30 Oct 2003 23:06, guran wrote: Is it possible to use swsusp as a regular halt-susp to get around the need of everyone who thinks that the next second is important. Otherwise I think that Linux or Unix has other walues than a fast start. regards guran Well... about the fact

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-29 Thread Chris Picton
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 01:41, Han Boetes wrote: Frederic Conrotte wrote: Since I switched to Linux with MDK8.2, I've always noticed the XFS daemon (X Font Server) and the DM daemon (Display Manager) are not started among the first services to be started. DM need XFS started before it can

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-29 Thread John Allen
On Tuesday 28 October 2003 10:52 pm, Vedran Ljubovic wrote: --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: don't even own a network card. Therefore I probably don't need sshd at all. Isn't xinetd startup of ssh disabled by default, in favour of starting as a daemon? Hm you're right. It seems

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-29 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- John Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well I was on dial up (DSL now), but I have a lan, and the server shares the inet connection, and I need NFS enabled by default. Perhaps the installer/control panel should ask whether you want NFS (server/client), or not at all. Yes, but you had

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-29 Thread Jos
On Wednesday 29 Oct 2003 07:08, Chris Picton wrote: I used the program 'serel' from http://www.fastboot.org for a while during the 9.1 - 9.2 cooker phase, and had no problems with it. Bootup was faster. The program has not been updated in a while, but seems to be fairly complete as it

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-29 Thread Frank Griffin
Jos wrote: I did some testing myself, working on something similar, though I still don't know what people prefer: that I hack init, or replace /etc/rc.d/rc by a binary... Is the problem that the necessary initializations take too long, or that they take too long when run serially under a

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-29 Thread Jos
On Wednesday 29 Oct 2003 10:48, Frank Griffin wrote: Jos wrote: I did some testing myself, working on something similar, though I still don't know what people prefer: that I hack init, or replace /etc/rc.d/rc by a binary... Is the problem that the necessary initializations take too long,

[Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-28 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
Hi, Recently there were some articles on Slashdot proposing alternative boot procedures. Most of them advocate parallelizing of SysV-init tasks. Motivated by these I've decided to make a detailed analysis of boot procedure and see how can I make it faster. I have an oldish PC that can run most

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-28 Thread Michael Scherer
On Tuesday 28 October 2003 20:14, Vedran Ljubovic wrote: Hi, Recently there were some articles on Slashdot proposing alternative boot procedures. Most of them advocate parallelizing of SysV-init tasks. Motivated by these I've decided to make a detailed analysis of boot procedure and see

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-28 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- Michael Scherer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Do we need to run depmod if no new modules are installed (many ways to check)? i think it use -A switch and so is runned only if it should. Well if there are new modules it takes almost 30 seconds, without them it's 4 seconds consistently.

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-28 Thread bgmilne
Hi, - Sysv is already mostly parallelized. It takes 26 seconds which is better than I expected. Actually, as I understand, on this single-cpu machine the overhead of context switching is so high that xinetd and cups would probably start faster if they were not parallelized with X. -

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-28 Thread Frederic Conrotte
Just my 2 cents... since I switched to Linux with MDK8.2, I've always noticed the XFS daemon (X Font Server) and the DM daemon (Display Manager) are not started among the first services to be started. DM need XFS started before it can be launched. DM is the services that launch KDE and therefore

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-28 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: don't even own a network card. Therefore I probably don't need sshd at all. Isn't xinetd startup of ssh disabled by default, in favour of starting as a daemon? Hm you're right. It seems that xinetd is used for fam. - While I'm at it, I also don't need

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-28 Thread Han Boetes
Frederic Conrotte wrote: Since I switched to Linux with MDK8.2, I've always noticed the XFS daemon (X Font Server) and the DM daemon (Display Manager) are not started among the first services to be started. DM need XFS started before it can be launched. DM is the services that launch KDE and

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-28 Thread dhenry . f
Hello, I read that there is a new feature in the kernel2.6 called futexes. It's seems to allow fast context switching... I hope it helps you. (I really don't know) Fabrice. Selon Han Boetes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Frederic Conrotte wrote: Since I switched to Linux with MDK8.2, I've always