-Original Message-
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 21:22:10 +0300
Andrey Borzenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
at least make it depend on CONFIG_CRAMFS_INITRD. it is not that crmafs
is available but that it is used for initrd.
but if it is really read-only, our initrd needs
Andrey Borzenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm working on our linuxrc to be able to use cramfs.
I on working on linuxrc based on initramfs. Now when
I got Al Viro advice how to free it it should be easy. This allows
to avoid *any* filesystem builtin in kernel :)
his solution would be a
Olivier Blin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How can harddrake detect the mouse/keyboard type ?
It is easy ?
it's not.
see:
- the issues with detecting the wheel of ps/2 mice
- the recent issues in kernel-2.6.0-test9 with sharing mouse
keyboard box for several machine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thierry Vignaud wrote:
Olivier Blin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How can harddrake detect the mouse/keyboard type ?
It is easy ?
it's not.
see:
- the issues with detecting the wheel of ps/2 mice
Is this still necessary? On the mklivecd list it
-Original Message-
Olivier Blin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How can harddrake detect the mouse/keyboard type ?
It is easy ?
it's not.
see:
- the issues with detecting the wheel of ps/2 mice
wrt to kernel it is irrelevant. we speak about detecting correct
driver (module) for
-Original Message-
Andrey Borzenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm working on our linuxrc to be able to use cramfs.
I on working on linuxrc based on initramfs. Now when
I got Al Viro advice how to free it it should be easy. This allows
to avoid *any* filesystem builtin
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 15:18:28 +0300
Andrey Borzenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- the issues with detecting the wheel of ps/2 mice
wrt to kernel it is irrelevant. we speak about detecting correct
driver (module) for mouse. To this extent we have (on 2.6)
psmouse - for any sort of PS/2
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 03:18:28PM +0300, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
98kbd - anyone knows waht it is?
i think the jeyboard for pc98 (japanese pc specification)
--
Luca Berra -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Communication Media Services S.r.l.
/\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
XAGAINST HTML MAIL
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 04:56:07AM +0100, Olivier Blin wrote:
I'll submit a (very small) patch for mkinitrd to add splash in 2.6
initrds.
could you add cramfs support ?-)
yes, no problem
Should I make it an option in mkinitrd ?
please,
if you change initrd could you start with my codebase
Olivier Blin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
by the way, why aren't new module-init-tools updated in main ?
because the maintainer is hiding somewhere :(
Well, the packager (Chmouel) is gone, he doesn't work at
MandrakeSoft anymore.
The real maintener is now Andrey, but I guess he hasn't
Andrey Borzenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
by the way, why aren't new module-init-tools updated in main ?
because the maintainer is hiding somewhere :(
Well, the packager (Chmouel) is gone, he doesn't work at
MandrakeSoft anymore.
module-init-tools have been maintained by
i've uploaded your work. hotplug is maintained by fredl.
good he has been silent wrt initscirpts as well. I hope he's
not following fpons ...
btw your changes result in quite some changes (are you sure we haven't
lost any features ?) :
you never know till you test it.
---
Andrey Borzenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i've uploaded your work. hotplug is maintained by fredl.
good he has been silent wrt initscirpts as well. I hope he's not
following fpons ...
he won't but he's busy with managment stuff (he's head of developers)
looks like reverse diff to me.
... cramfs
Should I make it an option in mkinitrd ?
I guess yes. But this is compatibility problem. It is not
supported on vanilla kernel so you have to detect patched kernel
somehow. And how are you going to do it? You will get a flood of
bug reports from users who
... cramfs
Should I make it an option in mkinitrd ?
I guess yes. But this is compatibility problem. It is not
supported on vanilla kernel so you have to detect patched kernel
somehow. And how are you going to do it? You will get a flood of
bug reports from users
On Monday 17 November 2003 18:59, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
... cramfs
Should I make it an option in mkinitrd ?
I guess yes. But this is compatibility problem. It is not
supported on vanilla kernel so you have to detect patched kernel
somehow. And how are you
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 21:22:10 +0300
Andrey Borzenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
at least make it depend on CONFIG_CRAMFS_INITRD. it is not that crmafs
is available but that it is used for initrd.
but if it is really read-only, our initrd needs some tweaking indeed
What's this
Andrey Borzenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i've uploaded your work. hotplug is maintained by fredl.
good he has been silent wrt initscirpts as well. I hope he's
not following fpons ...
Heu ? I see everything (provided you are talking about me ;-))
Francois.
-Original Message-
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 21:22:10 +0300
Andrey Borzenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
at least make it depend on CONFIG_CRAMFS_INITRD. it is not that crmafs
is available but that it is used for initrd.
but if it is really read-only, our initrd needs some
On Sunday 16 November 2003 08:15, Olivier Blin wrote:
PS.
if i only could compile
# CONFIG_SCSI_AIC7XXX is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_AIC7XXX_OLD is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_AIC79XX is not set
:(
It builds fine here :)
it does not build with src dir != build dir. At lease aic7xxx not
On Sunday 16 November 2003 06:56, Olivier Blin wrote:
my current patch tarball is uploading
linux-test9s5.tar.bz2
nosrc.rpm may be rpm after successfully recompile
under the same kernel :-)
please keep just patches for us poor dial-upers as well :)
by the way, why aren't new
On Sunday 16 November 2003 05:31, Olivier Blin wrote:
--
arent the following pretty important,
and alwasys needed ?
the right question is - are they needed to *boot* kernel?
-CONFIG_PACKET=y
+CONFIG_PACKET=m
module
On Sunday 16 November 2003 00:44, Olivier Blin wrote:
--
-CONFIG_X86_ALIGNMENT_16=y
+CONFIG_X86_GOOD_APIC=y
I can't find where it is referenced
in arch/i386/Kconfig
I mean - referenced in the *code*. this looks like leftover that is not more
used.
[...]
-CONFIG_PACKET=y
On Sunday 16 November 2003 06:20, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 23:20:00 +0100 (MET)
Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nope, module does not work. Even if it possible to fix all missing
exported
symbols, IDE layer does not provide for any sort of
On Sunday 16 November 2003 06:56, Olivier Blin wrote:
my current patch tarball is uploading
linux-test9s5.tar.bz2
nosrc.rpm may be rpm after successfully recompile
under the same kernel :-)
please keep just patches for us poor dial-upers as well :)
nosrc.rpm's will
On Sunday 16 November 2003 05:31, Olivier Blin wrote:
--
arent the following pretty important,
and alwasys needed ?
the right question is - are they needed to *boot* kernel?
-CONFIG_PACKET=y
+CONFIG_PACKET=m
module
On Sunday 16 November 2003 06:20, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
my current patch tarball is uploading
linux-test9s5.tar.bz2
I tried 3rdparty but it won't work as is. Dynamically generating Makefile and
Kconfig highly confuses build system; BTW it won't even compile if all
3rdparty are modules.
On Sunday 16 November 2003 06:20, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 23:20:00 +0100 (MET)
Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nope, module does not work. Even if it possible to fix all missing
exported
symbols, IDE layer does not provide for any sort
On Sunday 16 November 2003 15:10, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
On Sunday 16 November 2003 05:31, Olivier Blin wrote:
--
arent the following pretty important,
and alwasys needed ?
the right question is - are they needed to *boot* kernel?
On Sunday 16 November 2003 15:21, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
you missed my point. modular IDE is unsafe because there is no reference
counting for IDE modules. their patch does not change it, it just adds a
couple of EXPORT_MODULES. Nor does patch really fixes
MOD_{INC,DEC}_USE_COUNT
On Sunday 16 November 2003 06:20, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
my current patch tarball is uploading
linux-test9s5.tar.bz2
I tried 3rdparty but it won't work as is. Dynamically generating Makefile
and
Kconfig highly confuses build system; BTW it won't even compile if all
3rdparty are
On Sunday 16 November 2003 15:21, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
you missed my point. modular IDE is unsafe because there is no
reference
counting for IDE modules. their patch does not change it, it just adds
a
couple of EXPORT_MODULES. Nor does patch really fixes
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 12:53:02 +0300
Andrey Borzenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
they could be loaded unconditionaly after root is mounted
(there might be some warnings, but nothing that could harm the
system)
Do you want to try to load *all* mouse and keyboard drivers at boot
? That
On Sunday 16 November 2003 06:20, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
my current patch tarball is uploading
linux-test9s5.tar.bz2
I tried 3rdparty but it won't work as is. Dynamically generating Makefile
and
Kconfig highly confuses build system; BTW it won't even compile if all
3rdparty are
On Sunday 16 November 2003 16:57, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
On Sunday 16 November 2003 15:21, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
you missed my point. modular IDE is unsafe because there is no
reference
counting for IDE modules.
[...]
wouldn't it be then sufficient just to prevent module
On Sunday 16 November 2003 15:45, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
On Sunday 16 November 2003 06:20, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
my current patch tarball is uploading
linux-test9s5.tar.bz2
I tried 3rdparty but it won't work as is. Dynamically generating Makefile
and
Kconfig highly
On Sunday 16 November 2003 16:57, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
On Sunday 16 November 2003 15:21, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
you missed my point. modular IDE is unsafe because there is no
reference
counting for IDE modules.
[...]
wouldn't it be then sufficient just to
On Sunday 16 November 2003 20:15, Olivier Blin wrote:
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 12:53:02 +0300
Andrey Borzenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
they could be loaded unconditionaly after root is mounted
(there might be some warnings, but nothing that could harm the
system)
Do you want to
On Sunday 16 November 2003 15:45, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
On Sunday 16 November 2003 06:20, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
my current patch tarball is uploading
linux-test9s5.tar.bz2
I tried 3rdparty but it won't work as is. Dynamically generating
Makefile
and
Kconfig
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 04:44, Olivier Blin wrote:
$ diff -u kernel-config-2.6-{,allmod-}i586smp | egrep -A 3^-.*=y
-CONFIG_M586=y
+# CONFIG_M586 is not set
# CONFIG_M586TSC is not set
# CONFIG_M586MMX is not set
OK that needs tweaking anyway.
--
-CONFIG_X86_F00F_BUG=y
Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Found stupid problem, this will be fixed in -25mdk.
Upgraded to -25mdk and it is working fine again. Thanks.
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 20:57:36 +0300
Andrey Borzenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 04:44, Olivier Blin wrote:
+# CONFIG_M586 is not set
OK that needs tweaking anyway.
-CONFIG_X86_F00F_BUG=y
F00F code is really small, there is no reason to disable it.
ok, I will
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 04:44, Olivier Blin wrote:
Hi,
-CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM=y
+CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM=m
should it be builtin for initrd to work? If not there is no reason to have
it
builtin.
IIRC yes, it has to be built in
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE=4096
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD=y
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 22:44:02 +0100
Olivier Blin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Furthermore, ide is initialized before ramdisk is loaded, this will
need some tweaking if we want to build IDE as module.
I don't know what prevents ramdisk from being loaded before initcalls
are done.
Maybe I'll ask on
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 23:20:00 +0100 (MET)
Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nope, module does not work. Even if it possible to fix all missing
exported
symbols, IDE layer does not provide for any sort of module reference
counting
(for chipset drivers) meaning it is simply
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 23:20:00 +0100 (MET)
Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nope, module does not work. Even if it possible to fix all missing
exported
symbols, IDE layer does not provide for any sort of module reference
counting
(for chipset drivers) meaning it is
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 04:20:24 +0100 (MET)
Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder how they do it.
Is there a patch for modular IDE in their kenrel ?
It is officially broken, even in 2.4 .
yes, they do have patches both for 2.4 for 2.6
2.6 patches uploaded
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 04:56:07 +0100
Olivier Blin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you please make your kernel config file available so that we can
discuss a bit more about options ?
Nevermind, I've found it.
How comes you have some extended attributes option for ReiserFS ?
You've enabled lots of
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 04:20:24 +0100 (MET)
Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder how they do it.
Is there a patch for modular IDE in their kenrel ?
It is officially broken, even in 2.4 .
yes, they do have patches both for 2.4 for 2.6
2.6 patches uploaded
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 04:56:07 +0100
Olivier Blin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you please make your kernel config file available so that we can
discuss a bit more about options ?
Nevermind, I've found it.
How comes you have some extended attributes option for ReiserFS ?
:-) i found a
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 05:55:50 +0100 (MET)
Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice, why not uploading your package to contrib ?
long time ago i wanted to submit similar multi-user kernel (based on
2.4), but really a lot of people didn't want yet another kernel :(
Yep, that's a
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 06:06:41 +0100 (MET)
Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:-) i found a suse 2.6 rpm -- check the patch tarball
suse have ea + acl for ext2/3 reiserfs jfs xfs for more then a year
:(
ok, I'll have a look
PS.
if i only could compile
# CONFIG_SCSI_AIC7XXX is
Just wondering, what is the rough development plan for Cooker?
Specifically, at what stage will the kernel 2.6 series be the focus and
the 2.4 go to contribs?
Is it a stated goal that the 2.6 kernel (not withstanding and critical
show stopper) will be the main kernel for Mandrake 10.0 (due
Just wondering, what is the rough development plan for Cooker?
Specifically, at what stage will the kernel 2.6 series be the focus and
the 2.4 go to contribs?
IMNSHO this is post-next release task. Actually i would even delay
it for release 11 :))
there are just too many problems to solve
Just wondering, what is the rough development plan for Cooker?
Specifically, at what stage will the kernel 2.6 series be the focus and
the 2.4 go to contribs?
IMNSHO this is post-next release task. Actually i would even delay
it for release 11 :))
there are just too many
-Original Message-
Just wondering, what is the rough development plan for Cooker?
Specifically, at what stage will the kernel 2.6 series be the focus and
the 2.4 go to contribs?
IMNSHO this is post-next release task. Actually i would even delay
it for release
-Original Message-
Just wondering, what is the rough development plan for Cooker?
Specifically, at what stage will the kernel 2.6 series be the focus
and
the 2.4 go to contribs?
IMNSHO this is post-next release task. Actually i would even delay
Hi
I've built a new release of 2.6-test9 with bootsplash support (yeah),
fixed framebuffer (CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE=y, not m) and built-in ide
chipsets support.
As kenobi is down and the upload script is broken, all my packages were
lost during upload from klama, I've kept the up package
where can i find that splash patch for 2.6?
i would like to apply it to my own kernel
, 13 2003, 22:53,Olivier Blin:
Hi
I've built a new release of 2.6-test9 with bootsplash support (yeah),
fixed framebuffer (CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE=y, not m) and built-in ide
chipsets support.
As
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 22:57:19 +0200
Diego Iastrubni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
where can i find that splash patch for 2.6?
i would like to apply it to my own kernel
It's made by Stefan Reinauer from Suse, you can find it here :
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/stepan/bootsplash/kernel/
Enjoy
--
It seems that /proc/cpufreq is not created when powernow-k7 is
insmoded... any ideas???
Cheers,
Emmanuel
Olivier Blin wrote:
Hi
I've built a new release of 2.6-test9 with bootsplash support (yeah),
fixed framebuffer (CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE=y, not m) and built-in ide
chipsets support.
As
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 21:33:34 +
Emmanuel Moll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that /proc/cpufreq is not created when powernow-k7 is
insmoded... any ideas???
Do you see any errors or warnings in syslog or when insmoding ?
If you tested older packages, did it work with them ?
Sorry, I've
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 10:30:49AM +0100, Olivier Blin wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 08:40:33 +0100
Luca Berra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
could you try and remove the CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG item?
It was already done.
I've removed almost all DEBUG options.
I've kept only CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL for Magic SysRq
-Original Message-
On Sunday 09 November 2003 14:07, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
[...]
2.4 with debuging (CONFIG_KSYMS=yes)
1337954 Aug 25 17:47 /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.22-1mdk
2.4 without KSYMS (~ kernel tmb here)
1035464 Nov 9 04:04 /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.22-21br.1mdk
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 12:33:18 +0300
Andrey Borzenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried allmodconfig which resulted in ~1.2MB bzImage - same as
2.4.22-1mdk in your case. You have to add ELF support to it (as it is
also module in this case) which apparently gives you bare minimum. It
is likely
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 12:19:57AM +0100, Olivier Blin wrote:
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 23:50:41 +0100
Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lördagen den 8 november 2003 23.56 skrev Olivier Blin:
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003 21:12:01 +0100
It will be in test9.5mdk .
No module aic7xxx found for kernel
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Jure Repinc wrote:
I have tried with kernel -24mdk and still the same problem. I did get
the partition table consistency check message and in paranthesis it
says: overflow.
Found stupid problem, this will be fixed in -25mdk.
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 08:40:33 +0100
Luca Berra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
could you try and remove the CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG item?
It was already done.
I've removed almost all DEBUG options.
I've kept only CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL for Magic SysRq keys,
CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP and CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER.
måndagen den 10 november 2003 03.59 skrev Leon Brooks:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 07:19, Olivier Blin wrote:
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 23:50:41 +0100
I said test9.5mdk ;)
I'm tweaking the config files right now, it will be built next
morning.
Oden could try setting his clock ahead... (-:
Cheers;
I have now installed -25mdk, and it works!
-- Bjarne
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 10:07, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Jure Repinc wrote:
I have tried with kernel -24mdk and still the same problem. I did get
the partition table consistency check message and in paranthesis it
måndagen den 10 november 2003 20.34 skrev Bjarne Thomsen:
I have now installed -25mdk, and it works!
-- Bjarne
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 10:07, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Jure Repinc wrote:
I have tried with kernel -24mdk and still the same problem. I did get
the
Just wanted to report that the new kernel now boots on a machine where -24mdk used to
fail.
Thank you Gwenole.
-o-
kk1
mdk9.2
2.4.22-25mdkenterprise
No more mount problem for
/dev/sda5 / ext3
had kernel panic since 2.4.22-22mdkenterprise
Bjarne
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 20:35, Oden Eriksson wrote:
måndagen den 10 november 2003 20.34 skrev Bjarne Thomsen:
I have now installed -25mdk, and it works!
-- Bjarne
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 01:07, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Jure Repinc wrote:
I have tried with kernel -24mdk and still the same problem. I did get
the partition table consistency check message and in paranthesis it
says: overflow.
Found stupid problem, this will be
On Sunday 09 November 2003 02:07, Olivier Blin wrote:
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 02:50:46 +0100
Olivier Blin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 01:23:35 +0100
Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another thing. I noticed ivp6 was loaded per default, why is that?
Hum, you're
söndagen den 9 november 2003 03.07 skrev Olivier Blin:
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 02:50:46 +0100
Olivier Blin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 01:23:35 +0100
Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another thing. I noticed ivp6 was loaded per default, why is that?
Hum, you're
On Sunday 09 November 2003 05:07, Olivier Blin wrote:
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 02:50:46 +0100
Olivier Blin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 01:23:35 +0100
Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another thing. I noticed ivp6 was loaded per default, why is that?
Hum, you're
On Saturday 01 November 2003 21:01, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
On Saturday 01 November 2003 06:03, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
all FS's built in ? why that ?
Oops, there is no reason to do that, I've now compiled ext3, jbd,
ReiserFS, jfs and xfs as modules in -2mdk.
ext2 is
On Wednesday 05 November 2003 14:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kernel-desktop can have all the preempt stuff and other things (setpcap?)
you do not want to have on your server.
actually capabilities are exactly for server for all I can say. It allows you
to run services with reduced privileges
{pts/1}% rpm -q module-init-tools
module-init-tools-0.9.15-0.pre2.0.2bor
any special reason for not using -pre3 ?
i'm thinking to rebuild them under 9.2 cooker
and upload them to the usuak address
(may be update to -pre3 if no reason exist)
hint hint
unless you give me permissions to
On Saturday 01 November 2003 21:01, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
On Saturday 01 November 2003 06:03, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
all FS's built in ? why that ?
Oops, there is no reason to do that, I've now compiled ext3, jbd,
ReiserFS, jfs and xfs as modules in -2mdk.
On Sunday 09 November 2003 14:14, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
{pts/1}% rpm -q module-init-tools
module-init-tools-0.9.15-0.pre2.0.2bor
any special reason for not using -pre3 ?
any special reason to use -pre3? AFAIK there are no significant changes
against -pre2 and I have nothing to add as
On Sunday 09 November 2003 14:07, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
[...]
2.4 with debuging (CONFIG_KSYMS=yes)
1337954 Aug 25 17:47 /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.22-1mdk
2.4 without KSYMS (~ kernel tmb here)
1035464 Nov 9 04:04 /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.22-21br.1mdk
2.6 without debuging
1532105 Oct 29 19:37
On Sunday 09 November 2003 14:14, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
{pts/1}% rpm -q module-init-tools
module-init-tools-0.9.15-0.pre2.0.2bor
any special reason for not using -pre3 ?
any special reason to use -pre3? AFAIK there are no significant changes
against -pre2 and I have nothing
On Sunday 09 November 2003 14:07, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
[...]
2.4 with debuging (CONFIG_KSYMS=yes)
1337954 Aug 25 17:47 /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.22-1mdk
2.4 without KSYMS (~ kernel tmb here)
1035464 Nov 9 04:04 /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.22-21br.1mdk
2.6 without debuging
1532105 Oct
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Wednesday 05 November 2003 14:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kernel-desktop can have all the preempt stuff and other things (setpcap?)
you do not want to have on your server.
actually capabilities are exactly for server for all I can say. It
On Sunday 09 November 2003 18:31, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
[...]
i'm thinking to rebuild them under 9.2 cooker
and upload them to the usuak address
(may be update to -pre3 if no reason exist)
[...]
PS.
i'm thinking also to upload them to mandrake-club
no. I do not want to
On Sunday 09 November 2003 18:51, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
[...]
That is with standard mdk config? Yes it is bad if kernel does not fit on
one
floppy.
if i didn't missed smth, it's a standard 2.4 mdk config
+ some new ide drivers (part of them probably can be built as modules)
and
On Sunday 09 November 2003 18:51, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
[...]
That is with standard mdk config? Yes it is bad if kernel does not fit
on
one
floppy.
if i didn't missed smth, it's a standard 2.4 mdk config
+ some new ide drivers (part of them probably can be built as
IMO there couldn't be a reason for not including them in cooker,
hotplug may be(?hotplug service?), but module-init-tools must go in
no one is forced to turn on this service (it can be off by default as far
as I
am concerned). Using coldpug fixed at least one real problem - usb-storage
lördagen den 8 november 2003 23.56 skrev Olivier Blin:
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003 21:12:01 +0100
Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi (Olivier Blin)
Is there a reason why aic7xxx is not compiled and provided with this
package?
No, there isn't any good reason ...
Perhaps it was disabled
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 23:50:41 +0100
Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lördagen den 8 november 2003 23.56 skrev Olivier Blin:
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003 21:12:01 +0100
It will be in test9.5mdk .
No module aic7xxx found for kernel 2.6.0-0.test9.4mdk
Sorry, but there's no aic7xxx support in
Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Please try .test3 kernel on a UP system. I think you really should get a
message about partition table consistency checks failure and a reason
in parenthesis (when determining disk partitions).
http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gbeauchesne/kernel/
And BTW, do you happen
måndagen den 10 november 2003 00.19 skrev Olivier Blin:
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 23:50:41 +0100
Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lördagen den 8 november 2003 23.56 skrev Olivier Blin:
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003 21:12:01 +0100
It will be in test9.5mdk .
No module aic7xxx found for kernel
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 15:21, Jure Repinc wrote:
Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Please try .test3 kernel on a UP system. I think you really should get a
message about partition table consistency checks failure and a reason
in parenthesis (when determining disk partitions).
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 07:19, Olivier Blin wrote:
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 23:50:41 +0100
I said test9.5mdk ;)
I'm tweaking the config files right now, it will be built next
morning.
Oden could try setting his clock ahead... (-:
Cheers; Leon
Hi,
I have tried with kernel -24mdk and still the same problem. I did get
the partition table consistency check message and in paranthesis it
says: overflow.
Thanks, I now have something to work on. It could be that start_sec
nr_sects values are signed (but I can't find this on the specs) so
Hi (Olivier Blin)
Is there a reason why aic7xxx is not compiled and provided with this package?
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003 21:12:01 +0100
Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi (Olivier Blin)
Is there a reason why aic7xxx is not compiled and provided with this
package?
No, there isn't any good reason ...
Perhaps it was disabled by Olivier Thauvin in previous releases because
it didn't
lördagen den 8 november 2003 23.56 skrev Olivier Blin:
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003 21:12:01 +0100
Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi (Olivier Blin)
Is there a reason why aic7xxx is not compiled and provided with this
package?
No, there isn't any good reason ...
Perhaps it was disabled
1 - 100 of 2234 matches
Mail list logo
