Re: [Cooker] 8.2 beta 3 comments

2002-02-22 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Oden Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The "detection" and "configuration" of my MS Intellimouse (from 1996) doesn't > work with beta 3. I had to use a standard mouse during the install phase. I > used the latest hd.img image. (it has worked before...) what's "before" here? -- Guillaum

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 beta 3 comments

2002-02-22 Thread Oden Eriksson
On Fridayen den 22 February 2002 18.18, Pixel wrote: > "H.McM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > > > > it's not my choice. try to bother [EMAIL PROTECTED] with this. > > > > I'm not going to commit a faux pas by contacting him directly? > > no > > > > > set_active failing > > > > > > can you

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 beta 3 comments

2002-02-22 Thread Pixel
"H.McM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > > it's not my choice. try to bother [EMAIL PROTECTED] with this. > > I'm not going to commit a faux pas by contacting him directly? no > > > set_active failing > > > > can you give the /root/drakx/report.bug.gz ? fixed.

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 beta 3 comments

2002-02-22 Thread H.McM
Heya, thanks for ploughing through my email :) > > > > 2. Is it possible to improve the description for the package kdebindings? At > > the moment all it say is "kdebindings". Perhaps though this is a problem for > > the KDE developers? > > yep, find a KDE developer and shoot him down :) Targe

[Cooker] 8.2 beta 3 comments

2002-02-22 Thread H.McM
Hi All, Installed beta 3 this morning, and then updated it with the freshest rpms from my local mirror. I have a few comments/suggestions that you may or may not choose to ignore :) 1. Are the samba-swat, samba-winbind and samba-doc packages going to appear in the list of packages during inst

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta3 Install Report

2002-02-21 Thread Matthew Harrison
actly as I install Mandrake like a machine just doing repetative tasks. Matt - Original Message - From: "Tech At Mathco Dot Com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 3:44 PM Subject: Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta3 Install Report &

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta3 Install Report

2002-02-21 Thread Tech At Mathco Dot Com
Even though I didn't write the email to begin with, here is the specifications on HP's website. HP DeskJet 841C Series printer - Product Specifications http://www.hp.com/cposupport/printers/support_doc/bpd08592.html /MattB On Thu, 2002-02-21 at 14:06, Till Kamppeter wrote: > You have really an

[Cooker] 8.2 Beta3 Install Report

2002-02-21 Thread Matthew Harrison
Well, the install went off just fine. Printer was auto-detected unlike in the previous two betas. (HP DeskJet 841C). I still can't add a Security Updates source in Software Manager even after adding a cooker source and updating all packages it recommended. When I try to run LogDrake it tells me

[Cooker] 8.2 request: multiple routing tables

2002-02-20 Thread Leon Brooks
Please compile the kernels with multiple routing tables enabled. It allows multi-homing out of the box using iproute2. Cheers; Leon

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta 2 Report

2002-02-19 Thread Pixel
Luc Roseberry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The last step, lilo and boot program, was stopping. I tried 6 installations > before deciding to change my partitions for > hda1/ > removing the /boot and keeping all the other ones. Then I was able to install. could you give more info? "stopping"

[Cooker] 8.2 b2 on Sis 735 chipset

2002-02-19 Thread Borsenkow Andrej
Forwarding from NG. What's up with bug database as well? In case somebody wished to contact original author ... sorry guy has mangled address. His choice :-) "bob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].. . > Michael

[Cooker] 8.2 Beta 2 Report

2002-02-18 Thread Luc Roseberry
Big problem with the install. My partitions were: hda1 /boot hda5 / hda6 /usr hda7 /tmp ... hdb1swap ... hds1/home The last step, lilo and boot program, was stopping. I tried 6 installations before deciding to change my partitions for hda1/ removing the /boot and k

Re: [Cooker] [cooker] (8.2 beta 2) programs fails to detect SDL1.2Library

2002-02-18 Thread Fabrice FACORAT
le lun 18-02-2002 à 18:36, Stefan van der Eijk a écrit : > M. L. wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am new programmer in this mailing list. I recently installed > > Mandrake 8.2 beta 2 to test it. > > > > I tried to compile the stable version of Mplayer-0.60 > > (http://www.mplayerhq.hu/homepage/) > >

Re: [Cooker] [cooker] (8.2 beta 2) programs fails to detect SDL1.2 Library

2002-02-18 Thread Dark Tux
Installing alsa-lib-devel works! Thanks. >From: Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [Cooker] [cooker] (8.2 beta 2) programs fails to detect SDL1.2 >Library >Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 01:36:30 +080

Re: [Cooker] [cooker] (8.2 beta 2) programs fails to detect SDL1.2 Library

2002-02-18 Thread Stefan van der Eijk
M. L. wrote: > Hi, > > I am new programmer in this mailing list. I recently installed > Mandrake 8.2 beta 2 to test it. > > I tried to compile the stable version of Mplayer-0.60 > (http://www.mplayerhq.hu/homepage/) > > Even if i try with the latest CVS, i get message "Checking for SDL ... > n

[Cooker] [cooker] (8.2 beta 2) programs fails to detect SDL1.2 Library

2002-02-18 Thread M. L.
Hi, I am new programmer in this mailing list. I recently installed Mandrake 8.2 beta 2 to test it. I tried to compile the stable version of Mplayer-0.60 (http://www.mplayerhq.hu/homepage/) Even if i try with the latest CVS, i get message "Checking for SDL ... no" Note : The problem is not li

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 questions

2002-02-13 Thread Anthony Symons
I think its fine on a properly configured system. Ive been using mandrake since 7.2 and check those reports each week to make sure people arnt tampering with my systems or doing stupid things. Of corse I modify all my servers to send their mail for root back to my desktop. Requirements might be

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 questions

2002-02-13 Thread David Walser
Hmm, well the concern wasn't who it's mailing to, but the fact that it's mailing at all... --- Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > [...] > > > 2. In msec in 8.1, it mails nobody every night > about world-writable files > > and open port

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 questions

2002-02-13 Thread Frederic Lepied
David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > 2. In msec in 8.1, it mails nobody every night about world-writable files > and open ports. Since this isn't a log, it's not logrotated, and if you > don't check it, it grows out of control. 8.2's msec isn't still doing this > it? afaik it

[Cooker] 8.2 beta 2

2002-02-12 Thread ggrlinux
Can't find scannerdrake although my scanner is recognized by harddrake (microtek X6el SCSI device). Harddrake still does not recognize the chipset of my Intel P4 mobo (850 chipset). Still doesn't recognize my Linksys net card although the generic drivers work fine. Modem not recognized, but I

RE: [Cooker] 8.2 questions

2002-02-11 Thread David Walser
Well sure, I did make menu files for them, but they use wording and icons from other ones, I'm sure Mandrake would want to do theirs differently :o) Also, I don't know if they have received menu files since 8.1, the ChangeLog list isn't archived back that far :o( If you want me to post that list

RE: [Cooker] 8.2 questions

2002-02-10 Thread Borsenkow Andrej
> > 3. In 8.1 a lot of the games (I can give you a list if you want) Oh! So you have a list? But then you can just as well send these missing menu files, do not you? Or even better patch for specs to these games that would include these files? -andrej

[Cooker] 8.2 questions

2002-02-10 Thread David Walser
1. I sent an e-mail to the list a few days ago about the optflags in rpmrc, and haven't heard back. Who's the rpm package maintainer? Did they read my message? 2. In msec in 8.1, it mails nobody every night about world-writable files and open ports. Since this isn't a log, it's not logrot

[Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta laptop power management]]

2002-02-08 Thread Owen Savill
This email is subject to the disclaimer set out below * Hmmm. I started this thread about ACPI and APM and Kernel power management and just how flaky things have got. I know that I misspelled ACPI as APIC ! So I think this thread is now carry

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta laptop power management

2002-02-06 Thread Christopher Samuel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Tuesday 05 Feb 2002 5:04 pm, you wrote: > I am speaking of APIC, as far as I know APM is still > used as the default power manager as ACPI is still > immature in Linux. Thanks for the clarification - with the problems being with laptop suspends, etc, it sou

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta laptop power management

2002-02-05 Thread Randy Welch
I think it depends on the system. My A22p suspends/resumes fine not that the kernel doesn't try to do things with the APIC but the BIOS won't let it. Try it. -randy Bernard Varaine wrote: > My HP XE3 suspend to disk and resume fine with 8.1 +cooker (relatively > old as I am running kernel

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta laptop power management

2002-02-05 Thread SI Reasoning
I am speaking of APIC, as far as I know APM is still used as the default power manager as ACPI is still immature in Linux. The defualt kernel does not even enable ACPI and in the recent past did not enable APIC. Unfortunately, APIC is enabled in the current kernel and it is creating havoc among s

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta laptop power management

2002-02-05 Thread Christopher Samuel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Monday 04 Feb 2002 11:23 pm, SI Reasoning wrote: > Unfortunately, the situation is so bad now with the > kernel, if the power plug becomes unplugged at any > time and the my Dell Inspiron 8000 goes on battery > power, I get a complete freeze. How many UP box

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta laptop power management

2002-02-04 Thread Bernard Varaine
My HP XE3 suspend to disk and resume fine with 8.1 +cooker (relatively old as I am running kernel 2.4.13-7) I was going to try to catchup and install the latest cooker but not sure anymore Bernard darrell wrote: > My Dell Inspiron 8000 works just fine with APM under Mandrake 8.1, > thoug

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta laptop power management

2002-02-04 Thread darrell
My Dell Inspiron 8000 works just fine with APM under Mandrake 8.1, though I never bothered with suspend or suspend-to-disk. It is only this 8.2 beta release where any power event causes a hang. I only want it to work the same or better than 8.1, not worse. darrell

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta laptop power management

2002-02-04 Thread SI Reasoning
--- tester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Without a UP install kernel with APIC, many > multipe-processor installs > won't work. There are also rigs with multiple IDE > controllers that need > APIC even with the UP platform. And there is a > small, intensely working > group of engineers try

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta laptop power management

2002-02-04 Thread Liam Quin
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 10:29:25PM +, OS wrote: > As I said in an ealier posting I've gone all the way back to Mandrake 6.0 and > it still behaves the same. I dont' know when APIC came in ? Stopping APMD > from starting at boot seems to move the Kernel NULL pointer to "swapper". I also have

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta laptop power management

2002-02-04 Thread Reinhard Katzmann
Hi! On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 08:22:31PM +, OS wrote: > The only thing in common is that they both use the Phoenix NoteBIOS 4.n. > I have seen similar reports for Sony VAIO's as well. Do they use Phoenix > NoteBIOS ? My Sony Vasio FX-301 uses Phonix Bios V4.0. Quite primitive BIOS GUI (i.e.

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta laptop power management

2002-02-04 Thread OS
> Without samples and some tech info from the manufacturer, our chances of > making notebooks work out of the box aren't as good as they could be > otherwise, What exactly do you mean ? How can I help ? After all, I have two offending laptops !! As I said in an ealier posting I've gone all the

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta laptop power management

2002-02-04 Thread OS
Hello, > Have you attempted to install LM 8.1? I've now gone right the way back Mandrake 6.0. I flat refuse to go back to Red Hat 5.2 !!! Disabling BIOS Power Management and not switching on APMD at boot time still results in a Kernel NULL pointer (bit prone to de-referencing NULL pointers i

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta laptop power management

2002-02-04 Thread tester
William Bouterse wrote: > On Sat, 2 Feb 2002 20:53:26 + > OS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote these words: > > >>Yes ! Me and now several others have started threads on more than one mailing >>list stating that the old Linux power management was bad, but the new systems >>(APIC and APMD beta 3)

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta laptop power management

2002-02-04 Thread OS
Hello, > What make and model is the notebook you plan to use ? > Is it a Dell as well ? Far from it. The laptop in question is an Acer Extensa. The only thing in common is that they both use the Phoenix NoteBIOS 4.n. I have seen similar reports for Sony VAIO's as well. Do they use Phoenix NoteB

RE: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta 1 Bugs

2002-02-04 Thread Borsenkow Andrej
> > 2.) Nvidia drivers are broken, I get an error when > compiling the nvidia kernel, it says there is already > a /dev/nvidia0 and I can't rm -f the file to overwrite > it with the one from the nvidia kernel package. You should and need not. New nvidia drivers support devfs and these files ar

[Cooker] 8.2 Beta 1 Bugs

2002-02-04 Thread Ryan Kather
This has probably been submitted. I can't find it in the archives, but I've found a couple of problems in 8.2 Beta 1. These are very minor and one of them is most likely a 3rd parties fault. 1.) In your things to do menu's in Gnome and KDE you have a number of typos. Lesson to a music c

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 kernel compile

2002-02-04 Thread Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek
> > The file sched.h looks ok (there is no strange hex constant in the file > at line 6 Any macros? I'm sometimes wondering about weird errors that appear in visually correct code that expands into garbage during preprocessing ;-) -- Michal Suchanek [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [SNF] Re: [Cooker] 8.2 SNF feature. and other comments + new bug.

2002-02-04 Thread Florin
Randy Welch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Thanks I'll try them out this weekend. > > A couple of other items to note: > > 1. When entering the configuraiton screens for SNF it can't find a whole > lot of information from the install in regards to the base network > settings entered on the i

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 beta1 problems.

2002-02-03 Thread Dave Seff
Yes. I had the same problem. I noticed that alsa was instaled but the aliases for the modules were not configured. I had to modify the /etc/modules.conf manually. Boo! -Dave > The mixer appears, but I can't play anything. no sound comes out. > All the IRQs and DMAs seem right but no sound.

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta laptop power management

2002-02-03 Thread Reinhard Katzmann
Hi Fabrice! On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 04:11:21PM +0100, Fabrice FACORAT wrote: > le sam 02-02-2002 à 21:53, OS a écrit : > > Yes ! Me and now several others have started threads on more than one mailing > > list stating that the old Linux power management was bad, but the new systems > > (APIC an

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta laptop power management

2002-02-03 Thread William Bouterse
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002 20:53:26 + OS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote these words: > Yes ! Me and now several others have started threads on more than one mailing > list stating that the old Linux power management was bad, but the new systems > (APIC and APMD beta 3) REALLY suck !!! > > What really i

[Cooker] 8.2 beta - Cannot change font/character in KDE login manager

2002-02-03 Thread Claudio
Hi! I've just seen that when I change character in KDE login manager (using kcontrol as root --> login manager --> characters) all I have is that each lecter is covered with two small lines... If this is a KDE's bug, please excuse me! C. -- Claudio Panichi, System/Network Admin at Dept. of Phy

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta laptop power management

2002-02-03 Thread Fabrice FACORAT
le sam 02-02-2002 à 21:53, OS a écrit : > Yes ! Me and now several others have started threads on more than one mailing > list stating that the old Linux power management was bad, but the new systems > (APIC and APMD beta 3) REALLY suck !!! http://lwn.net/2002/0131/kernel.php3 http://lwn.net/20

[Cooker] 8.2 beta1 problems.

2002-02-03 Thread ss1356
Some bugs I noticed After using 8.1 Release and upgrading to 8.2 Beta... System is Athlon 1200, RTL 8139, WinTV-GO, Belkin firewire. SB AWE64. I noticed I'm prompted for XF 4.1 although 4.2 is actually installed. Harddrake seems to have a problem configuring my sound card. It finds module

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta laptop power management

2002-02-02 Thread OS
Yes ! Me and now several others have started threads on more than one mailing list stating that the old Linux power management was bad, but the new systems (APIC and APMD beta 3) REALLY suck !!! What really intriques me is how Linux is being positioned as the OS for all platforms, and yet lock

[Cooker] 8.2 Beta 1 ISO install issues.

2002-02-02 Thread Randy Welch
This is from the ISO images... This is on a ThinkPad A22p ( Rage Mobility 128 ).. 1. When using start X on system start the login display shows no background and no display around the login display, very weird. 2. When logging into KDE it complains about not being able to start

Re: [SNF] Re: [Cooker] 8.2 SNF feature. and other comments + new bug.

2002-02-01 Thread Randy Welch
Florin wrote: > Randy Welch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > 4. Once the httpd-naat is started you can get to the initial login screen, but you can't get logged in. Even after setting the password for admin ( via passwd or /usr/share/naat/scripts/change-password.pl admin ).

RE: [Cooker] 8.2 kernel compile

2002-02-01 Thread Borsenkow Andrej
> /usr/src/linux-2.4.17-12mdk/include/linux/sched.h:6: parse error before > `7b16c344' ... > Any suggestions? Mmake mrproper cp /boot/config .config make oldconfig make ... old known problem

[Cooker] 8.2 kernel compile

2002-01-31 Thread darrell
Attempting to compile the kernel modules, I get the following message make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.17-12mdk/drivers/char/ftape/compressor' gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.17-12mdk/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fom

[Cooker] 8.2 Beta laptop power management

2002-01-31 Thread darrell
I installed 8.2 beta on a Dell Inspiron 8000. When the screen attempted to dim the machine powered down. With a fresh 8.2 install power management still doesn't work. apmd is running but any change in power status (unplug for instance) causes the machine to hand. This worked fine in 8.1 darrell

Re: [SNF] Re: [Cooker] 8.2 SNF feature. and other comments + new bug.

2002-01-31 Thread Florin
Randy Welch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> 4. Once the httpd-naat is started you can get to the initial login > >> screen, but you can't get logged in. Even after setting the password > >> for admin ( via passwd or /usr/share/naat/scripts/change-password.pl > >> admin ). This is kind of a sh

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 + multimedia ( divx ) support

2002-01-30 Thread Fabrice FACORAT
le mar 29-01-2002 à 21:41, Guillaume Rousse a écrit : > Ainsi parlait Fabrice FACORAT : > > le lun 28-01-2002 à 20:53, Sergio Korlowsky a écrit : > > > You need aviplayer, is what use myself. > > > > bad 'cause : > > + bas GUI > > + need win32 dll for divx, so ... licensing issues > wrong, elsewh

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 SNF feature. and other comments + new bug.

2002-01-30 Thread Randy Welch
> > The time restriction in SquidGuard are acting strangely? I have a time > restriction setup from 19:00-23:59 pst. When I try to access through > the proxy within that time period I get rejected because of time > restriction. > Ignore this. Always helps to read the first line about s

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 SNF feature. and other comments + new bug.

2002-01-30 Thread Randy Welch
>>4. Once the httpd-naat is started you can get to the >>initial login screen, but you can't get logged in. Even >>after setting the password for admin ( via passwd or >>/usr/share/naat/scripts/change-password.pl admin ). This is >>kind of a show stopper for me in the one application I >>

[Cooker] 8.2 Beta 1 Install Hard Lock

2002-01-29 Thread Rob Hall
Hello All, Just tried installing Beta 1 and suffered a hard lock when the kernel came to initiallising the APIC. System Specs:- Asus A7M266-D (AMD 760MPX chipset) Dual Athlon MP 1800+ ATI Radeon 8500LE Asus PCI USB card Netgear FA-311 Adaptec 2940 ATI TV Wonder SB Live 5.1 Player. Messages Pri

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 + multimedia ( divx ) support

2002-01-29 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait Fabrice FACORAT : > le lun 28-01-2002 à 20:53, Sergio Korlowsky a écrit : > > You need aviplayer, is what use myself. > > bad 'cause : > + bas GUI > + need win32 dll for divx, so ... licensing issues wrong, elsewhere it woud had never been included in distro, even in contrib: it ca

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 + multimedia ( divx ) support

2002-01-29 Thread Fabrice FACORAT
le lun 28-01-2002 à 20:53, Sergio Korlowsky a écrit : > You need aviplayer, is what use myself. bad 'cause : + bas GUI + need win32 dll for divx, so ... licensing issues + no unencrypted DVD support so not a real multimedia player. Really xine need to be put in main distro ! mdksoft aims to

Re: [SNF] Re: [Cooker] 8.2 SNF feature. and other comments

2002-01-29 Thread Florin
Randy Welch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > No, but it should require the right package not only apache as both > > httpd-naat and httpd-perl provide apache. It actually point to httpd but httpd-perl has a higher priority and gets installed before httpd, so the binary is missing. Simply install

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 SNF feature. and other comments

2002-01-29 Thread Randy Welch
Thanks for the info! Florin wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randy Welch) writes: > > >>2. /usr/sbin/httpd-naat is symlinked to /usr/sbin/httpd I >>suspect it should symlinked to /usr/sbin/httpd-perl. >> > > No, but it should require the right package not only apache as both > httpd-naat and ht

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 B1-install and aftermath

2002-01-29 Thread Charles A Edwards
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 09:16:33 +0300 Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If disk is in drive then floppy is accessable BUT devfs will then not > > properly set-up the zip drive. > > Please, explain what you mean. If you want it to be fixed at least. The > word "properly" is far too amb

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 SNF feature. and other comments

2002-01-29 Thread Florin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randy Welch) writes: Hello there, In cooker we have two major problems with SNF: the mod_auth_external and the php-gd packages. > Selecting SNF-en from the package list seeming installs the > right things but a few things are not quite right. > > 1. /etc/init.d/bastile-fi

[Cooker] 8.2 SNF feature. and other comments

2002-01-28 Thread Randy Welch
Selecting SNF-en from the package list seeming installs the right things but a few things are not quite right. 1. /etc/init.d/bastile-firewall has a syntax error on line 60, a quoting problem. 2. /usr/sbin/httpd-naat is symlinked to /usr/sbin/httpd I suspect it should symlinked to /usr/sbin

RE: [Cooker] 8.2 B1-install and aftermath

2002-01-28 Thread Borsenkow Andrej
> If disk is in drive then floppy is accessable BUT devfs will then not > properly set-up the zip drive. Please, explain what you mean. If you want it to be fixed at least. The word "properly" is far too ambiguous. Is it IDE Zip drive? -andrej

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 + multimedia ( divx ) support

2002-01-28 Thread Roger
On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 14:53, Sergio Korlowsky wrote: > On Monday 28 January 2002 04:02, you wrote: > -> I've just read the contents of the 2 Cd and ... I wasn't able to see a > -> player for divx. > -> > -> So what does mdksoft plan to do concerning multimedia/divx support ? > -> This lack a lot !

[Cooker] 8.2 Beta 1 Install Report

2002-01-28 Thread Mike Eheler
Didn't have time to do much variations, but I did a "typical" install for myself -- expert mode, individual package selection with much modification using the flat mode package selection. Loved the idea of the updates during install. I tried it, and found it odd that some "updated" packages we

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 B1-install and aftermath

2002-01-28 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Charles A Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This an install on a second system. > > 800mhz Duron, Radeon 32MB DDR, USB Zip > > During installation/pkg selection unless the installation was > started with a disk in the zip drive then pkg selection Can Not > be loaded from or saved to a flop

[Cooker] 8.2 B1-install and aftermath

2002-01-28 Thread Charles A Edwards
This an install on a second system. 800mhz Duron, Radeon 32MB DDR, USB Zip During installation/pkg selection unless the installation was started with a disk in the zip drive then pkg selection Can Not be loaded from or saved to a floppy. No floppy option is created during bootloader. If disk i

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 + multimedia ( divx ) support

2002-01-28 Thread Sergio Korlowsky
On Monday 28 January 2002 04:02, you wrote: -> I've just read the contents of the 2 Cd and ... I wasn't able to see a -> player for divx. -> -> So what does mdksoft plan to do concerning multimedia/divx support ? -> This lack a lot ! XP have manty many features and if a mdk box is not -> able to r

[Cooker] 8.2 + multimedia ( divx ) support

2002-01-28 Thread Fabrice FACORAT
I've just read the contents of the 2 Cd and ... I wasn't able to see a player for divx. So what does mdksoft plan to do concerning multimedia/divx support ? This lack a lot ! XP have manty many features and if a mdk box is not able to read divx out of the box, I think that most new users will be

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta 1 and compilers

2002-01-27 Thread Stew Benedict
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, David Walser wrote: > For what? It compiles fine with gcc 2.95.3, which I > see there's a Cooker package for, and AFAIK, egcs > doesn't do pentium optimization. true - but we don't ship an x86 version, 2.95 is there for PPC, as 2.96 has some issues on PPC Stew Benedict -

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta1 Install

2002-01-27 Thread guran
On Sunday 27 January 2002 8:44 pm, Charles A Edwards wrote: > This post relates only to the 8.2 beta1 installer. > 1)During printer configuration if Add printer is selected the installation > stalls at this point. Ctrl-Alt-F3 gives at this point: ...Perl v18.84.584 required... This is only v.5.

[Cooker] 8.2 Beta1 Install

2002-01-27 Thread Charles A Edwards
This post relates only to the 8.2 beta1 installer. I like the changes that have been made in the installer. Did encounter 2 problems. 1)During printer configuration if Add printer is selected the installation stalls at this point. 2)At bootloader stage I choose expert in order to set /tmp to

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta 1 and compilers

2002-01-27 Thread David Walser
For what? It compiles fine with gcc 2.95.3, which I see there's a Cooker package for, and AFAIK, egcs doesn't do pentium optimization. --- Stew Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > kernel22 still needs egcs __ Do You Yahoo!? Great stuff seeking n

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta 1 and compilers

2002-01-27 Thread Stew Benedict
On Sat, 26 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I notice from the list of RPMs that the 8.2 beta 1 release has gcc-2.9.6 > gcc3.0 and egcs-1.1.2. > > Are there packages in the Mandrake distribution which can not compile > with gcc 3.0? Are there any packages in the Mandrake distribution which

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta 1 and compilers

2002-01-27 Thread Reinhard Katzmann
Hi Jason, On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 02:10:05PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I notice from the list of RPMs that the 8.2 beta 1 release has gcc-2.9.6 > gcc3.0 and egcs-1.1.2. > > In addition to making the distribution larger, I would think that > distributing multiple compilers complicates su

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 beta

2002-01-27 Thread Sergio Korlowsky
On Saturday 26 January 2002 22:48, you wrote: -> On January 26, 2002 10:13 pm Joe Menola said: -> -> >Am I correct in assuming that the -> > MandrakeLinux-Cooker-20011224-CD(S).i586.iso images are the same as the 8.2 -> > beta images will be? -> -> No. There is about a month difference. Beta s

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 beta

2002-01-26 Thread J.P. Pasnak
On January 26, 2002 11:07 pm Joe Menola said: > >Where should one be looking for these 8.2 beta images? .../mandrake-iso, >.../mandrake-devel or where? There has been no official announcement of the beta ISO's yet, just rumours. When they come out, they would be in /mandrake-iso though. -- L

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 beta

2002-01-26 Thread Joe Menola
On Saturday 26 January 2002 10:48 pm, you wrote: > On January 26, 2002 10:13 pm Joe Menola said: > >Am I correct in assuming that the > > MandrakeLinux-Cooker-20011224-CD(S).i586.iso images are the same as the > > 8.2 beta images will be? > > No. There is about a month difference. Beta should b

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 beta

2002-01-26 Thread J.P. Pasnak
On January 26, 2002 10:13 pm Joe Menola said: >Am I correct in assuming that the > MandrakeLinux-Cooker-20011224-CD(S).i586.iso images are the same as the 8.2 > beta images will be? No. There is about a month difference. Beta should be pretty close to what cooker is now. The 'Christmas Cook

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 beta

2002-01-26 Thread Joe Menola
On Saturday 26 January 2002 10:18 pm, you wrote: > Joe Menola ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Am I correct in assuming that the > > MandrakeLinux-Cooker-20011224-CD(S).i586.iso images are the same as > > the 8.2 beta images will be? > > What's in a name? > > > Groetjes, Han. Nothing, what's in the

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 beta

2002-01-26 Thread Han
Joe Menola ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Am I correct in assuming that the > MandrakeLinux-Cooker-20011224-CD(S).i586.iso images are the same as > the 8.2 beta images will be? What's in a name? Groetjes, Han. -- http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software

[Cooker] 8.2 beta

2002-01-26 Thread Joe Menola
Am I correct in assuming that the MandrakeLinux-Cooker-20011224-CD(S).i586.iso images are the same as the 8.2 beta images will be?

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 forlorn hope

2002-01-26 Thread Ron Stodden
andre wrote: > > Op za 26-01-2002, om 16:16 schreef Ron Stodden: > > > 6.1 completely fails to install wheel logic for a PS/2 mouse with a > > wheel. 8.0 could be persuaded to by post-installing imwheel, but there > > is no imwheel in the 8.1 distribution. > > As far as i know imwheel is in 8.

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 forlorn hope

2002-01-26 Thread tester
Ron Stodden wrote: > Both 8.0 and 8.1 on a full expert and full network install completely > neglect to install the nfs-clients RPM, thus disabling any attempt at > nfs-based networking. Well, nfs is broken so readily by a Reiser partition at either end that a default install is a bad idea. I

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 Beta 1 and compilers

2002-01-26 Thread Maks Orlovich
On Saturday 26 January 2002 02:10 pm, you wrote: > I notice from the list of RPMs that the 8.2 beta 1 release has gcc-2.9.6 > gcc3.0 and egcs-1.1.2. > > In addition to making the distribution larger, I would think that > distributing multiple compilers complicates support issues. > > Are there pa

[Cooker] 8.2 Beta 1 and compilers

2002-01-26 Thread schonm
I notice from the list of RPMs that the 8.2 beta 1 release has gcc-2.9.6 gcc3.0 and egcs-1.1.2. In addition to making the distribution larger, I would think that distributing multiple compilers complicates support issues. Are there packages in the Mandrake distribution which can not compile wit

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 forlorn hope

2002-01-26 Thread andre
Op za 26-01-2002, om 16:16 schreef Ron Stodden: > 6.1 completely fails to install wheel logic for a PS/2 mouse with a > wheel. 8.0 could be persuaded to by post-installing imwheel, but there > is no imwheel in the 8.1 distribution. As far as i know imwheel is in 8.1 It is also in cooker. It cou

[Cooker] 8.2 forlorn hope

2002-01-26 Thread Ron Stodden
Both 8.0 and 8.1 on a full expert and full network install completely neglect to install the nfs-clients RPM, thus disabling any attempt at nfs-based networking. 6.1 completely fails to install wheel logic for a PS/2 mouse with a wheel. 8.0 could be persuaded to by post-installing imwheel, but t

Re: [Cooker] 8.2 forlorn hope

2002-01-26 Thread Pixel
Ron Stodden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Both 8.0 and 8.1 on a full expert and full network install completely > neglect to install the nfs-clients RPM, thus disabling any attempt at > nfs-based networking. weird. Do you have the same problem with cooker? > > 6.1 completely fails to install w

<    1   2   3   4