On 18/05/06, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert O'Rourke wrote:
[...I would really
appreciate it if anyone could have a look on mac browsers and earlier IE
versions.
http://www.1850.co.uk/
Rob
FYI here is a very useful URL:
http://www.danvine.com/icapture/
Thanks a bundle to everyone =]
The screen shots provided by David Laasko all look good to me, there's a
bit of a width issue on the product boxes in IE5.0 but it's still set
out like a list so i'm going to treat that as 'acceptable' for now.
I can't believe i forgot about those site map and
Andree Hollander wrote:
Here's a screen shot from Mac OS X 10.4, Netscape 7.2.
Overall it looks very nice, but the last item on the left (Home Page
Featured Items) has too little room. And I think it is strange that
the tooltips on the links have the same text at the items themselves.
Hi all,
If anyone's got a minute, could they have a look at http://
www.fiddlerontherails.com - it's tested in Safari, Firefox Mac and
IE6 (although there have been a few changes since then), but any
other browsers and any feedback would be great.
Thanks in advance!
Tom
] On Behalf Of Tom Payne
Sent: 03 May 2006 08:52
To: CSS List
Subject: [css-d] Site Check Please!
Hi all,
If anyone's got a minute, could they have a look at http://
www.fiddlerontherails.com - it's tested in Safari, Firefox Mac and
IE6 (although there have been a few changes since then), but any
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Payne
Sent: 03 May 2006 08:52
To: CSS List
Subject: [css-d] Site Check Please!
Hi all,
If anyone's got a minute, could they have a look at http://
www.fiddlerontherails.com - it's tested
On 3 May 2006, at 08:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing I notice (Maxthon - IE6) is that if the font is set to
Largest, your top menu wraps the CONTACT link onto a second row. I
guess
this is due to the fixed width of your content column.
Thanks James,
I've made a
Hi gang:
Please review the following site:
http://ancientstones.com
Suggestions and comments welcomed.
Thank you.
tedd
--
http://sperling.com/
On 06/04/27 08:55 (GMT-0400) tedd apparently typed:
Please review the following site:
http://ancientstones.com
Suggestions and comments welcomed.
Nice. But, those using sidebars are likely not to appreciate it so much.
It requires a lot of viewport width or a smallish default text size to
tedd wrote:
Hi gang:
Please review the following site:
http://ancientstones.com
Suggestions and comments welcomed.
Thank you.
tedd
Sweet!
Has David Laakso seen this site?
Nothing constructive to add, however, some of your images seem to need
the background changed to match the
At 8:20 PM +0530 4/27/06, Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
tedd wrote:
Hi gang:
Please review the following site:
http://ancientstones.com
Suggestions and comments welcomed.
Thank you.
tedd
Sweet!
Has David Laakso seen this site?
Interesting that you should ask -- he's provided much design
At 9:54 AM -0400 4/27/06, Felix Miata wrote:
On 06/04/27 08:55 (GMT-0400) tedd apparently typed:
Please review the following site:
http://ancientstones.com
Suggestions and comments welcomed.
Nice. But, those using sidebars are likely not to appreciate it so much.
It requires a lot of
At 1:23 PM -0400 4/27/06, David Laakso wrote:
On 06/04/27 08:55 (GMT-0400) tedd apparently typed:
Okay, what would be a good maximum width measurement (in pixels)?
Thanks.
tedd
I prefer 780 min with 1200 max feeding same to the 'evil one' with
'ie expressions. Felix will, I hope, provide the
The main page title bar says Ancient Title. Think you mean Tile :)
On 4/27/06 5:55 AM, tedd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi gang:
Please review the following site:
http://ancientstones.com
Suggestions and comments welcomed.
Thank you.
tedd
Okay, what would be a good maximum width measurement (in pixels)?
Some may disagree with this, but I try to aim at using WebTV's (MSN TV)
browser's usable screen area as a max measurement: 544 for the width (I
haven't succeeded with all my pages yet). As we all know, it is hard,
really, to
On 4/27/06, David Merchant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
a max measurement: 544 for the width
TTFN,
David
/snip
8^O
544!? Max!? Wow! What's that look like at a 1600x1200+ resolution?
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
www.mlinc.com
On 06/04/27 12:32 (GMT-0400) tedd apparently typed:
At 9:54 AM -0400 4/27/06, Felix Miata wrote:
On 06/04/27 08:55 (GMT-0400) tedd apparently typed:
Please review the following site:
http://ancientstones.com
Suggestions and comments welcomed.
Nice. But, those using sidebars are likely
I suspect the large font size must be due to selecting Georgia as the
first choice?
Just a question, as a newbie ( still! ), what does the lge class do; as in
...span class=lge nbsp;|nbsp; /span...
I didn't see it defined in either style sheet?
Really liked the clean design, especially after
8^O
544!? Max!? Wow! What's that look like at a 1600x1200+ resolution?
Well, I actually try to make them fluid, so for larger resolutions the
sites don't look bad, but 'tis hard to make sites completely fluid (at
least for me) and so at some point when reducing window down, the page
isn't
-Original Message-
From: tedd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 7:55 AM
To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: [css-d] Site Check Please -- ancientstones.com
Hi gang:
Please review the following site:
http://ancientstones.com
Suggestions
At 3:59 PM -0400 4/27/06, Tom Livingston wrote:
On 4/27/06, David Merchant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
a max measurement: 544 for the width
TTFN,
David
/snip
8^O
544!? Max!? Wow! What's that look like at a 1600x1200+ resolution?
I personally think that in trying to accommodate the
Felix hath said:
Okay, what would be a good maximum width measurement (in pixels)?
None. Let it be whatever size it needs to be.
-snip (good stuff) --
Those adjustments may very well including permitting a reduced width, in
order to allow a squeeze in place of a scroll for viewers with
On 4/27/06, tedd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
only 20 percent of the viewing audience has a screen size of 800 x 600 and
that figure is dropping at a rate of 5 percent per six months (10 percent per
year).
As such, in two years, the narrow-screen user number will drop below a
detectable amount.
haves.
deano
-Original Message-
From: tedd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 7:55 AM
To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: [css-d] Site Check Please -- ancientstones.com
Hi gang:
Please review the following site:
http://ancientstones.com
I have checked with Firefox WinXP
I have checked with IE6 WinXP
I have checked with Golive's Live Rendering, which is supposed to be Opera
(WinXP)
I'd appreciate a site check with other browser / OS configurations.
Site is http://iamsentme.com
Thank you,
Robert
Hi Robert
I had a look at the site and clicked around. Basically no problems
that I could see.
Platform:
Mac OS X 10.4.6
Browsers / Test results:
Safari v2.0.3 (417.9.2) / No noticeable problems
Firefox v1.5.0.2 / No noticeable problems
Camino 1.0 / No noticeable problems
Opera 8.54 / No
Hi All,
Thanks for the pointers last week but my client from last week is still
complaining about problems with his site www.avciarchitects.com. I think
he's referring to old issues but could people please check the site for me.
There is a glitch in IE Mac still where the site is aligned to the
Tim (The Site Doctor) wrote:
my client from last week is still
complaining about problems with his site www.avciarchitects.com.
You should ask him what issues exactly he is speaking of, if he is using
the internet or firefox, what resolution, which page ...
I don't expect that the scattered
Hi Ingo,
I've already asked him to find out what the environment the errors are
occurring in but have just had the response PC, with Firefox, Explorer, and
Navigator which isn't very useful. I'm currently waiting on more
information.
He did mention a script error -I'm assuming that was one
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.ninaza.com
I know I've got an issue with Opera and the Suckerfish dropdowns (I
need an explicit width on the LI's , I believe)
Compared Opera 8.5 9tp2 to Firefox 1.5.0.1 and IE6. Couldn't see any
differences regarding the menu or any other parts of that
Ryan,
On Apr 12, 2006, at 2:15 PM, Ryan Brunsvold wrote:
Requesting a site check (excluding menu - which is linked to the old,
table-based site and should be ignored) for the following site:
Site: http://www.baycreek.net/newest.html
CSS: http://www.baycreek.net/newest.css
Having a few
I posted this site a couple weeks ago and got some great comments-thanks
again-wondering if anyone would give another quick look-all css is valid;
still have a few html errors and I am not sure how to fix-those are below if
anyone has any thought on that-I've made some changes (again much thanks
From: Stephanie Chausse
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 10:03 AM
http://www.provlib.org/ppl/about/about.html
one I'd like comments on is the breadcrumbs-position of
them-does it make the page too cluttered up there with the
searches?-Does it
make the navigation any better? The page below
On 14.04.2006 17:03, Stephanie Chausse wrote:
I posted this site a couple weeks ago and got some great comments-thanks
again-wondering if anyone would give another quick look-all css is valid;
still have a few html errors and I am not sure how to fix-those are below if
anyone has any thought
Stephanie Chausse wrote:
I posted this site a couple weeks ago and got some great comments-thanks
again-wondering if anyone would give another quick look..]
http://www.provlib.org/ppl/about/about.html
Stephanie Chausse
Uwe answered the validation questions.
As far as the rest is
Ryan Brunsvold wrote:
Requesting a site check (excluding menu - which is linked to the old,
table-based site and should be ignored) for the following site:
Site: http://www.baycreek.net/newest.html
CSS: http://www.baycreek.net/newest.css
Having a few display problems in Safari.
Sorry, no
Hi again everyone,
Requesting a site check (excluding menu - which is linked to the old,
table-based site and should be ignored) for the following site:
Site: http://www.baycreek.net/newest.html
CSS: http://www.baycreek.net/newest.css
Having a few display problems in Safari, so any help on that
Ryan Brunsvold wrote:
Hi again everyone,
Requesting a site check (excluding menu - which is linked to the old,
table-based site and should be ignored) for the following site:
Site: http://www.baycreek.net/newest.html
CSS: http://www.baycreek.net/newest.css
I think you'll need a
We are rapidly approaching launch and I am still awaiting content, but I
do have some things working (not all links work up in the header and the
search is not implemented yet). Also, I know that the site fails for
character set...we will be adding this to the Apache configs. You'll
need a
On 06/04/11 01:29 (GMT-0400) Jonathan Mao apparently typed:
http://www.intrinsicdigital.com/test/
What do you mean by mousetype?
Mousetype is slang for any text that is significantly smaller than the
user default. Opinions on the size threshhold vary, but generally begin
at somewhere around
Hi all
I hate to trouble for something that has no doubt been covered...
I'm having trouble with the display of the footer when viewed with IE
6 / Win
http://www.intrinsicdigital.com/test/
The layout should look like this:
http://www.intrinsicdigital.com/test/screenshot.html
Any
Hi again
The page also seems to look weird in Opera 8.54 (Mac)
I'm looking into it now... but if you have any ideas... :-)
Cheers
Jonno
On 10/04/2006, at 9:42 PM, Jonathan Mao wrote:
Hi all
I hate to trouble for something that has no doubt been covered...
I'm having trouble with the
Jonathan Mao wrote:
Hi all
I hate to trouble for something that has no doubt been covered...
I'm having trouble with the display of the footer when viewed with IE
6 / Win
http://www.intrinsicdigital.com/test/
The layout should look like this:
On 11/04/2006, at 2:56 AM, ~davidLaakso wrote:
Jonathan Mao wrote:
Hi all
I hate to trouble for something that has no doubt been covered...
I'm having trouble with the display of the footer when viewed with
IE 6 / Win
http://www.intrinsicdigital.com/test/
The layout should look
Jonathan Mao wrote:
Hi all
I hate to trouble for something that has no doubt been covered...
I'm having trouble with the display of the footer when viewed with IE
6 / Win
http://www.intrinsicdigital.com/test/
The layout should look like this:
On 11/04/2006, at 11:06 AM, ~davidLaakso wrote:
Jonathan Mao wrote:
Hi all
I hate to trouble for something that has no doubt been covered...
I'm having trouble with the display of the footer when viewed with
IE 6 / Win
http://www.intrinsicdigital.com/test/
The layout should look
The problem has been resolved.
Thanks to David and Felix for their help.
Cheers
Jonno
On 11/04/2006, at 11:06 AM, ~davidLaakso wrote:
Jonathan Mao wrote:
Hi all
I hate to trouble for something that has no doubt been covered...
I'm having trouble with the display of the footer when
Jonathan Mao wrote:
On 11/04/2006, at 11:06 AM, ~davidLaakso wrote:
Jonathan Mao wrote:
I'm having trouble with the display of the footer when viewed with
IE 6 / Win
http://www.intrinsicdigital.com/test/
The layout should look like this:
On 11/04/2006, at 2:38 PM, ~davidLaakso wrote:
Jonathan Mao wrote:
On 11/04/2006, at 11:06 AM, ~davidLaakso wrote:
Jonathan Mao wrote:
I'm having trouble with the display of the footer when viewed
with IE 6 / Win
http://www.intrinsicdigital.com/test/
The layout should look like
I just launched a site this morning - designed and built on a very rushed
schedule and without time for extensive testing on a wider range of browsers
(the company is in a heavily IE space). Since I'll be adding to the site later
in the week (hopefully) I'll have a chance to fix other issues
francky wrote:
Brian Funk wrote:
Keith Kaiser wrote:
OK! It's done.
help me out by taking a look and giving me some feedback.
http://kaiserklan.com/roundtable
on WinXP IE6:
.
5.
In general, be carefull with colored words on colored backgrounds.
There has to
Keith Kaiser wrote:
OK! It's done. I've checked it in Safari (developed on OSX), on
FireFox and in Linux, but not on Win IE, so please be kind if you find
a problem. This is a 100% CSS site with just enough .PHP to switch
pages, a complete rewrite from a very table oriented web page.
This is
~davidLaakso wrote:
Keith Kaiser wrote:
OK! It's done. I've checked it in Safari (developed on OSX), on
FireFox and in Linux, but not on Win IE, so please be kind if you find
a problem. This is a 100% CSS site with just enough .PHP to switch
pages, a complete rewrite from a very table
I want to send out a big how how to all the people who offered
advise, sent code pieces, or just looked at my site;
http://kaiserklan.com/roundtable I still have a bug or two but its
come a long way thanks to all the support out there.
--
YIS/YIV
Keith D Kaiser -- Venturing Roundtable
Keith Kaiser wrote:
I want to send out a big how how to all the people who offered
advise, sent code pieces, or just looked at my site;
http://kaiserklan.com/roundtable I still have a bug or two but its
come a long way thanks to all the support out there.
You are looking better. I've got
OK! It's done. I've checked it in Safari (developed on OSX), on
FireFox and in Linux, but not on Win IE, so please be kind if you find
a problem. This is a 100% CSS site with just enough .PHP to switch
pages, a complete rewrite from a very table oriented web page.
This is a completely volunteer
Mike Davies wrote:
www.integra-server.co.uk/essie/
The page appears correctly in Opera 7.54 and nearly correct in
IE5.0/Windows. There are a couple of things with Firefox :
Comment: those browsers are a bit old now. If Firefox is just as old
then that's probably the reason for those things,
OK! It's done. I've checked it in Safari (developed on OSX), on
FireFox and in Linux, but not on Win IE, so please be kind if you find
a problem. This is a 100% CSS site with just enough .PHP to switch
pages, a complete rewrite from a very table oriented web page.
This is a completely volunteer
Keith Kaiser wrote:
OK! It's done.
help me out by taking a look and giving me some feedback.
http://kaiserklan.com/roundtable
on WinXP IE6:
Your menu is being obscured by the starWrap content below.
http://www.stoneladder.ca/sandbox/temp/rt01.jpg
Brian Funk wrote:
Keith Kaiser wrote:
OK! It's done.
help me out by taking a look and giving me some feedback.
http://kaiserklan.com/roundtable
on WinXP IE6:
Your menu is being obscured by the starWrap content below.
http://www.stoneladder.ca/sandbox/temp/rt01.jpg
Prezence LimitedHi all,
I've checked this site (http://www.fullcirqle.co.za/) in Firefox 1.5 and IE6
SP2 on Windows XP, as well as Safari 1.31 on Mac OS X - all seems OK.
I have a strange bug on the registration form in Firefox on the Mac OS with
the legend tag spanning all the way across the
ian wrote:
I've checked this site (http://www.fullcirqle.co.za/) in Firefox 1.5
and IE6 SP2 on Windows XP, as well as Safari 1.31 on Mac OS X - all
seems OK.
Well, on the basics: let's hope none of your visitors need, or know how,
to use 'font-resizing', 'ignore font size' and/or 'minimum
ian wrote:
Prezence LimitedHi all,
I've checked this site (http://www.fullcirqle.co.za/) in Firefox 1.5 and IE6
SP2 on Windows XP, as well as Safari 1.31 on Mac OS X - all seems OK.
I have a strange bug on the registration form in Firefox on the Mac OS with
the legend tag spanning all the
Greetings,
I would appreciate some help and comments on this page:
http://mbreiding.us/2006/menu_new/menu.html
http://mbreiding.us/2006/menu_new/index.css
Issues:
Menu DIV needs to be the length of the number of thumbs or to the bottom
border.
Long menu items ( Shark Valley - Everglades NP)
2006/02/20
Hello, All:
I'd appreciate a site check of the redesign of my website, fat paw design.
http://www.fatpawdesign.com/index.html
http://www.fatpawdesign.com/fpdbaseformatcss.css
http://www.fatpawdesign.com/fpdpagecss.css
I am particulalry interested in how resizing the view-port, text
Hello everybody!
I just created a website for an art gallery. May I kindly ask you to check
the website for any CSS improvements? (Of course your opinion on style or
general points is also highly appreciated.)
You'll find the website at: http://www.saager.info
Many thanks in advance!
Oliver
Oliver Saager wrote:
Hello everybody!
I just created a website for an art gallery. May I kindly ask you to check
the website for any CSS improvements? (Of course your opinion on style or
general points is also highly appreciated.)
You'll find the website at: http://www.saager.info
Many
On 2/2/06, Oliver Saager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everybody!
I just created a website for an art gallery. May I kindly ask you to check
the website for any CSS improvements? (Of course your opinion on style or
general points is also highly appreciated.)
You'll find the website at:
Hi all. I'm wrapping up my internal testing on
http://test.cubiclearmy.com/
I'm using the basic skidoo-too layout from
http://webhost.bridgew.edu/etribou/layouts/skidoo_too/
Thanks for the time anybody who looks at this site.
Issues I'm aware of:
1. the page doesn't validate CSS.
2. The
Nice and clean overall. Just some point you might want to consider:
- the CSS validator objects to an empty color: rule for .proprieta at
line 398. AFAIK you're not using it anywhere, so you might just cull it
- text sized in pixels can't be resized in IE. Might try to use ems,
percents or
David Laakso wrote:
Joe Otten wrote:
I saw the page viewed in FF 1.0 and it had some serious layout issues. I
was wondering if others could spot any issues with code, layout, etc.
Site: http://udrise.udayton.edu/index.asp
Joe, in Debian FF1.0.7 @1400 the 3 sets of navigation
Check my site.. i think there are some problems but i don't know how to fix
them.. :|
http://www.augustomurri.it/workBoard/MUSEI
tnx to all!
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
On 1/26/06, Augusto Murri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check my site.. i think there are some problems but i don't know how to fix
them.. :|
http://www.augustomurri.it/workBoard/MUSEI
tnx to all!
I don't see any problems. Did you manage to fix them all?
--
--
Christian Montoya
AM
To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: [css-d] site check PLEASE
Check my site.. i think there are some problems but i don't know how to fix
them.. :|
http://www.augustomurri.it/workBoard/MUSEI
tnx to all!
__
css-discuss
Augusto Murri wrote:
Check my site.. i think there are some problems but i don't know how to fix
them.. :|
http://www.augustomurri.it/workBoard/MUSEI
tnx to all!
Augusto,
It is fine on my end @1400 in Debian FF1.07 and Konqueror 3.3. A little
more contrast for the text knocked out of pale
I saw the page viewed in FF 1.0 and it had some serious layout issues. I
was wondering if others could spot any issues with code, layout, etc.
Site: http://udrise.udayton.edu/index.asp
CSS: http://udrise.udayton.edu/style.css
Thank you,
-Joe
At 10:45 AM 1/25/2006 -0500, Joe Otten wrote:
I saw the page viewed in FF 1.0 and it had some serious layout issues. I
was wondering if others could spot any issues with code, layout, etc.
Sorry, no feedback on code issues, but in FF 1.5 (WinXP), it appeared fine
to me, I did not notice any
Joe Otten wrote,
I saw the page viewed in FF 1.0 and it had some serious layout issues. I
was wondering if others could spot any issues with code, layout, etc.
Site: http://udrise.udayton.edu/index.asp
CSS: http://udrise.udayton.edu/style.css
Thank you,
-Joe
Joe:
Looks very nice in
Joe Otten wrote:
I saw the page viewed in FF 1.0 and it had some serious layout issues. I
was wondering if others could spot any issues with code, layout, etc.
Site: http://udrise.udayton.edu/index.asp
CSS: http://udrise.udayton.edu/style.css
Thank you,
-Joe
Joe, in Debian FF1.0.7 @1400 the 3
Hi Felix...
Thanks for pointing these issues out. I still have some tweaking to do.
Much appreciated. For what it's worth, I set the CSS font sizes to em
values, not px, so that they are relative to what the browser is set to.
Would you still consider that to be, as you put it, so
Michael Mendelsohn wrote:
at www.masstaxpros.biz.
Is it bad practice to avoid inline styles? It seems to be valid. I'm
guessing you suggest avoiding it for maintenance purposes only?
No problems with inline-styles when it comes to validity. However,
inline-styles might become a maintenance
At 08/01/2006 00:57 (Sunday), david [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sam Leathers wrote:
Hey everyone. I finally got a chance to work on my own site, and I think
it's pretty good, but I'd like the experts opinions on if theres
anything I should change either for aesthetics or accessibility. the
Hello list...I've just joined!
I'm winding up a website that I made extensive use of CSS with
(www.mmwebsite.com/vasquez), and I'd love to get some feedback.
Specifically, I have a two questions...
In the upper left of every page, there's a javascript that puts a div on
the page that's wrapped
Hi Richard...
Thanks for looking! Which browser are you using?
Also, for anyone who can shed some light:
I have another question about my nav class: I'd like it stretch to the
bottom of the content, not the bottom of the browser window. Is this
possible?
Thanks,
- MM
The nav tabs
Michael Mendelsohn wrote:
www.mmwebsite.com/vasquez
I've only tested the site in IE, and I'm hoping it looks consistent
across different browsers.
Sorry, but it doesn't. Opera, Firefox and Safari don't agree with IE,
and not all that well with each other either.
One reason is the errors
Thanks Georg, for the good feedback.
I've updated my files with most of what you suggested, and they're now
at www.masstaxpros.biz.
Is it bad practice to avoid inline styles? It seems to be valid. I'm
guessing you suggest avoiding it for maintenance purposes only?
I'm still wondering how to
Hey everyone. I finally got a chance to work on my own site, and I think
it's pretty good, but I'd like the experts opinions on if theres
anything I should change either for aesthetics or accessibility. the
site is www.samleathers.com.
Sam
--
in life, direction is everything, distance is
Sam Leathers wrote:
Hey everyone. I finally got a chance to work on my own site, and I think
it's pretty good, but I'd like the experts opinions on if theres
anything I should change either for aesthetics or accessibility. the
site is www.samleathers.com.
Hmmm, I presume you're aware of
On Jan 7, 2006, at 6:45 PM, Sam Leathers wrote:
Hey everyone. I finally got a chance to work on my own site, and I
think
it's pretty good, but I'd like the experts opinions on if theres
anything I should change either for aesthetics or accessibility. the
site is www.samleathers.com.
Your
Sam Leathers wrote:
Hey everyone. I finally got a chance to work on my own site, and I think
it's pretty good, but I'd like the experts opinions on if theres
anything I should change either for aesthetics or accessibility. the
site is www.samleathers.com.
Sam
Ain't no expert. Don't
Hey everyone. I finally got a chance to work on my own site, and I think
it's pretty good, but I'd like the experts opinions on if theres
anything I should change either for aesthetics or accessibility. the
site is www.samleathers.com.
Screenshot from my browser:
I have tested my web site in Firefox 1.5 and IE6 running on Windows XP Home.
Can I please get a browser check for all other Windows, Linux and Mac
browsers. Thank you. I normally design web sites for 800 by 600 resolution.
Angus MacKinnon
MacKinnon Crest Saying
Latin - Audentes Fortuna Juvat
I have tested my web site in Firefox 1.5 and IE6 running on Windows XP Home.
Can I please get a browser check for all other Windows, Linux and Mac
browsers. Thank you. I normally design web sites for 800 by 600 resolution.
HTML: http://www.infoforce-services.com
CSS:
Hi Everyone,
Can someone please help me - I did my portfolio site in Dreamweaver and
tried to do the CSS properly; but now, a potential customer tells me that
she cannot get into the site at all. She seems to see a files list, but
cannot access the site. (The URL is in my signature)
Help! Can
Catherine Post wrote:
http://www.catherinepost.com
Links don't work without javascript enabled, so my guess is that that's
the show-stopper.
Other than that I can't see anything wrong, although all pages I visited
looked slightly broken because the layout is unable to take the stress
of
Hello,
I've helped someone to develop a page. It is here:
http://beta.erikvisser.net/clown/
http://beta.erikvisser.net/clown/stylecss/
I've tested it on Mac, Linux, Windows, with:
Safari 1.3,
IE Mac 5.2,
Firefox 1.03,
Mozilla 1.7.8,
Opera 8.5,
MS IE 6
Any remarks are welcome. But the looks /
I have a site I am working on and it is a WordPress template used as-is per
client request. I don't currently have Win/IE 5.x available to test the site
layout. I am told the site breaks unpleasantly in Win/IE 5.x and some
assistance would be appreciated. Presently, I have tested the site
Joshua Roark wrote:
I have a site I am working on and it is a WordPress template used as-is per
client request. I don't currently have Win/IE 5.x available to test the site
layout. I am told the site breaks unpleasantly in Win/IE 5.x and some
assistance would be appreciated. Presently, I
I am still new to CSS and will appreciate your suggestions for making
the code cleaner and more accessible. (This is a transitional layout
to more-or-less emulate our site's current table-based layout; the
final design should be better-looking and easier to navigate.)
Test page is here:
At 18:30 21-11-05, Roger Roelofs wrote:
http://inkworkswell.com/clients/monroelab
Safari and ie5/mac render the page comparably to ff1.5rc3 except for
the right hand navigation. In ie, only on the About Monroelab page,
that stripe is too far right and the nav is below the content on the
301 - 400 of 517 matches
Mail list logo
