Re: [css-d] CSS must be called in the head?

Yeah, I hear ya Philippe. No, not confusing with scripts. I ended up having to in one of my projects. I used the visibility trick. CSS in header.. #main {visibility:hidden;} Then at the end of the page, I toggle the opacity. ... other styles ... #main {visibility:visible;} This resulted

Re: [css-d] CSS must be called in the head?

> On Sep 21, 2017, at 3:11 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > > Some put theirs in the footer to get a better page load score. That seems … weird. Unless you know that **nothing** in that stylesheet will be used before the page has fully loaded. Otherwise the page will start re-rendering aka all k

Re: [css-d] CSS must be called in the head?

Incorrect. Some put theirs in the footer to get a better page load score. It's up to you. The most commonly used method is in the header. Best, Karl Sent from losPhone > On Sep 20, 2017, at 8:22 AM, John J wrote: > > And nowhere else, correct? I'm referring to external CSS > > Thank you.

Re: [css-d] CSS must be called in the head?

To the best of my knowledge, it is the recommended place. That's not to say it won't work elsewhere. You would most likely see odd things in rendering. I've seen blocks of styles in the body. I, personally, wouldn't do it. On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 9:22 AM, John J wrote: > And nowhere else, correct

Re: [css-d] CSS Grid: Can I flow content around blocks?

Thanks for pointing me to the docs, I hadn't looked there, (my bad, I know). I wondered about the figure + p option, but it's imperfect, because sometimes the first p will be short, (content is coming from a CMS). It's better than nothing, but I might go and re-think my strategy for this part of t

Re: [css-d] CSS Grid: Can I flow content around blocks?

> On Sep 16, 2017, at 3:05 AM, John Beales wrote: > > On the blog I'm coding each post is a container with a 12-column grid. Most > of the things that appear in each post, (paragraphs, blockquotes, etc), > span 8 columns: 3 - 10. However, I want to be able to pull them out to the > left or right

Re: [css-d] CSS Grid Question

Howdy Tom, ~~~ Friday, July 21, 2017, 12:18:41 PM (USA 'Somewhere on-the-road time-zone'), you wrote the message that appears below. My reply appears here and/or interspersed within your message. ~~~ > List, > Is it possible to style the rows and columns of a css grid - the grid itself? > I

Re: [css-d] CSS Grid Question

Ow, my head. On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 5:20 PM Eric A. Meyer wrote: > On 21 Jul 2017, at 14:18, Tom Livingston wrote: > > > Is it possible to style the rows and columns of a css grid - the grid > > itself? > > There's no way to say something like '@column[2] {border: 1px > solid;}' and thu

Re: [css-d] CSS Grid Question

On 21 Jul 2017, at 14:18, Tom Livingston wrote: Is it possible to style the rows and columns of a css grid - the grid itself? There's no way to say something like '@column[2] {border: 1px solid;}' and thus directly style the grid components. You have to assign some sort of element into

Re: [css-d] CSS Grid Question

Sure Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com > On Jul 21, 2017, at 1:18 PM, Tom Livingston wrote: > > List, > > Is it possible to style the rows and columns of a css grid - the grid itself? > > I have an upcoming layout that uses what looks like a tic-tac-toe > board -

Re: [css-d] CSS pseudo-class for source of :target

On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > Ok, I see. I was thinking navigation buttons. > Your example seemed to work, but I got this error. > > SyntaxError: Unexpected identifier 'clsn' > > Dreamweaver also didn't like the "let" calls. > ​sorry, the javascript code there uses c

Re: [css-d] CSS pseudo-class for source of :target

Ok, I see. I was thinking navigation buttons. Your example seemed to work, but I got this error. SyntaxError: Unexpected identifier 'clsn' Dreamweaver also didn't like the "let" calls. But it worked as far as I can tell. The title and text changes per the links on the side. Best, Karl DeSaulni

Re: [css-d] CSS pseudo-class for source of :target

On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > Hi Andre, > Couldn't let this one go.. :P > Would this be what you are looking to accomplish? > > http://designdrumm.com/example_target.html ​my use case would be more like this: http://osku.de/post/css-target-source-example3.html#bar ​

Re: [css-d] CSS pseudo-class for source of :target

Hi Andre, Couldn't let this one go.. :P Would this be what you are looking to accomplish? http://designdrumm.com/example_target.html HTH, Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com > On Aug 13, 2016, at 3:44 AM, Andre Osku Schmidt > wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:0

Re: [css-d] CSS pseudo-class for source of :target

On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:08 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > This might be worth taking a look at. > > http://jsfiddle.net/SchizoDuckie/fzZ9d/ ​ ahh, placing the link inside the :target, cool idea!​ Thanks Andre Schmidt __ css

Re: [css-d] CSS pseudo-class for source of :target

This might be worth taking a look at. http://jsfiddle.net/SchizoDuckie/fzZ9d/ Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com > On Aug 12, 2016, at 2:56 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > > Would this be what you're seeking? > I think this is the closest you can come if not. > > h1:

Re: [css-d] CSS pseudo-class for source of :target

Would this be what you're seeking? I think this is the closest you can come if not. h1:target { background: green; } h1:not(:target) { background: red; } Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com > On Aug 12, 2016, at 8:03 AM, Andre Osku Schmidt > wrote: > > Sorry

Re: [css-d] CSS pseudo-class for source of :target

> On Aug 12, 2016, at 10:03 PM, Andre Osku Schmidt > wrote: > > here is an example what it would do ("polyfilled" with javascript but > apparently we cant just create our own pseudo-classes, so this example uses > .source instead of :source): > http://osku.de/post/css-target-source-example2.htm

Re: [css-d] CSS pseudo-class for source of :target

> On Aug 12, 2016, at 9:42 PM, Chris Rockwell wrote: > > Consider a use-case in which your page has a long list of > anchors (imagine a sticky sidebar which scrolls with the user). The goal > (in my contrived scenario) would be to gray out the anchor which links to > the targeted element. > >

Re: [css-d] CSS pseudo-class for source of :target

Sorry, my first mail had an syntax error and was not clear enough, ill try again. here is an example of :target http://osku.de/post/css-target-source-example1.html there we have a single css definition: :target { background: green; } so when we click a link (with eg. href="#foo") in the unorder

Re: [css-d] CSS pseudo-class for source of :target

Yes, looks like it.. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/:target Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com > On Aug 12, 2016, at 7:42 AM, Chris Rockwell wrote: > > I might muddy the waters here, but I'll try to explain how I interpreted > the goal. Consider a

Re: [css-d] CSS pseudo-class for source of :target

Right, sorry. Was thinking about it wrong. -- Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic | ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com #663399 __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://ww

Re: [css-d] CSS pseudo-class for source of :target

I might muddy the waters here, but I'll try to explain how I interpreted the goal. Consider a use-case in which your page has a long list of anchors (imagine a sticky sidebar which scrolls with the user). The goal (in my contrived scenario) would be to gray out the anchor which links to the targe

Re: [css-d] CSS pseudo-class for source of :target

> On Aug 12, 2016, at 7:40 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > >> On Aug 12, 2016, at 7:32 AM, Tom Livingston wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Karl DeSaulniers >> wrote: >>> Hi Andre, >>> Why would you target the element for its href if you already have an id? >>> Not sure I am unders

Re: [css-d] CSS pseudo-class for source of :target

> On Aug 12, 2016, at 7:32 AM, Tom Livingston wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Karl DeSaulniers > wrote: >> Hi Andre, >> Why would you target the element for its href if you already have an id? >> Not sure I am understanding that part. >> >> For checking the href, like Tom said. >>

Re: [css-d] CSS pseudo-class for source of :target

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > Hi Andre, > Why would you target the element for its href if you already have an id? > Not sure I am understanding that part. > > For checking the href, like Tom said. > > a[href*='#foobar'] { > color: red; > } > > or if you know #foob

Re: [css-d] CSS pseudo-class for source of :target

Hi Andre, Why would you target the element for its href if you already have an id? Not sure I am understanding that part. For checking the href, like Tom said. a[href*='#foobar'] { color: red; } or if you know #foobar will always be at the end of the url you can use the $ a[href$='#foobar']

Re: [css-d] CSS pseudo-class for source of :target

>> >> - Is there really no such pseudo-class? >> - Would this be technically impossible? >> - Has this been proposed before? >> - Any tips for proposing one? ;P >> >> Cheers >> Andre Schmidt > > > I accidentally replied off list with... > > a[class="table-of-contents"]{ > color: red; > } > > G

Re: [css-d] CSS pseudo-class for source of :target

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Andre "Osku" Schmidt wrote: > #Hello.World, > > there seems to be no CSS pseudo-class that represents the element with an > href matching the fragment identifier of the URI of the document. kinda > like the source of :target [0]. > > For example with :target we ca

Re: [css-d] CSS Animation Scribble ?

There is no SVG file, it is strictly a PNG, I created manually in Photoshop. Photoshop sprite tools are weak I'm going to consider making a Photoshop plugin for this in the future. Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: On Apr 5, 2016, at 04:22, Crest Christopher wrote: The hover works, but the

Re: [css-d] CSS Animation Scribble ?

> On Apr 5, 2016, at 04:22, Crest Christopher > wrote: > > The hover works, but the sprite doesn't animate upon hover ? > > a { > height:23px > margin-top: -21px > display:block; > } > > a:hover { > background-position:0 -1225px // The sprite actual width > background:url ('spriteimage.png')

Re: [css-d] CSS Animation Scribble ?

background-size: 100% auto; ? Hard to help without a link to see what is happening. Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com On Apr 4, 2016, at 2:22 PM, Crest Christopher wrote: > The hover works, but the sprite doesn't animate upon hover ? > > a { > height:23px > marg

Re: [css-d] CSS Animation Scribble ?

The hover works, but the sprite doesn't animate upon hover ? a { height:23px margin-top: -21px display:block; } a:hover { background-position:0 -1225px // The sprite actual width background:url ('spriteimage.png') If I apply the width of the sprite to the anchor, the element gets re-positioned

Re: [css-d] CSS Animation Scribble ?

On Apr 1, 2016 8:04 AM, "Crest Christopher" wrote: > > Hi, I was hoping someone can help; I want to animate a scribble effect using CSS & SVG. Chris Coyier wrote a really comprehensive guide to that sort of animation and how it works https://css-tricks.com/svg-line-animation-works/ Alex Mitchel

Re: [css-d] CSS only popup to stay in viewport

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Greg Gamble wrote: > I have a popup that displays when you hover over an icon. It's a glorified tooltip, with descriptive information. When the icon is near the edge of the viewport it crossover into the area that is not viewable. Anyone have some CSS only trick

Re: [css-d] css-d Digest, Vol 157, Issue 1

OK I'll offer my $0.02 I stopped following the site because CSS in a vacuum is not interesting, to me. Real world work involves a three part combination of HTML CSS and Javascript. Discussing one without the others is like trying to get healthy by exercise alone, without paying attention to diet

Re: [css-d] css-d Digest, Vol 156, Issue 1

p.p.s jeez, you'd think by now I'd know how to post w/out quoting the entire digest! My bad; I'll blame gmail and a holiday cocktail ;) __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d

Re: [css-d] css-d Digest, Vol 156, Issue 1

p.s. and thank you also to all the members who have been so generous with their time and expertise over the years in contributing to the list On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 8:04 AM, sr nyc wrote: > Mr. Meyer, > > The list has been an invaluable resource for so many years (possibly the > first such list

Re: [css-d] css-d Digest, Vol 156, Issue 1

Mr. Meyer, The list has been an invaluable resource for so many years (possibly the first such list I've subbed to), and I've no doubt hundreds if not thousands would agree. Selfishly, though I spend less time with it than I used to, I would like to see it remain, but then I have no idea what time

Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly" apostrophe

On the first message from either person. Jeff Gates: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Philip: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com On

Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly" apostrophe

Chris, could you please forward (to the list) the message headers in the message from me which you believe was in Korean encoding, as I did with your message ? What you "quoted" was sent (by you) in Korean encoding (euc-kr) so it mis-represented what I had sent which was sent in utf-8 as with all

Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly" apostrophe

As I noted and quoted, YOUR email had the Korean encoding markers before I even entered the conversation. On 10/11/15, 11:56 PM, "Philip Taylor" wrote: > > >Chris Williams wrote: > >> Philip's second reply in this thread has the same markers. I hadn't >>even >> entered into the conversation yet

Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly" apostrophe

Chris Williams wrote: > Philip's second reply in this thread has the same markers. I hadn't even > entered into the conversation yet. "Philip's second reply in this thread" is presumably my message of 09/10/2015 17:36, which read : > Gates, Jeff wrote: > >> Instead of a ³tick² mark for an ap

Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly" apostrophe

Philip's second reply in this thread has the same markers. I hadn't even entered into the conversation yet. - From: Philip Taylor ... Content-type: text/plain; charset="EUC-KR" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable - On 10/11/15, 5:19 PM, "css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.

Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly" apostrophe

12 okt 2015 kl. 02:01 skrev Chris Williams : > Yeah, well whatever. I'm using Outlook on the Mac, which is not set to > Korean, as Philip seems to believe. When Philip quoted your letter, he didn’t think anything else beyond the fact that your message had among it message headers the character

Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly" apostrophe

Yeah, well whatever. I'm using Outlook on the Mac, which is not set to Korean, as Philip seems to believe. From: Tom Livingston Date: Sunday, October 11, 2015 at 4:37 PM To: Christopher Williams Cc: CSS-D Subject: Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly" apostrophe On

Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly" apostrophe

that Jeff was trying to communicate. Philip Taylor" > From: Tom Livingston > > Date: Sunday, October 11, 2015 at 12:37 PM > To: "p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk " > > Cc: Christopher Williams >, CSS-D > > > Subject: Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly

Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly" apostrophe

This. From: Tom Livingston Date: Sunday, October 11, 2015 at 12:37 PM To: "p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk" Cc: Christopher Williams , CSS-D Subject: Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly" apostrophe I only saw superscripted numbers as well, and I have my doubts that ios9.

Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly" apostrophe

On Sunday, October 11, 2015, Philip Taylor wrote: > > > Tom Livingston wrote: > > > For what it's worth, I usually use entities and have yet to hear of any > > issues. > > > > This: ’ not: ' > > > > Though, I am no Unicode scholar. > > Certain entities come predefined in HTML and XHMTL, and entit

Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly" apostrophe

Tom Livingston wrote: > For what it's worth, I usually use entities and have yet to hear of any > issues. > > This: ’ not: ' > > Though, I am no Unicode scholar. Certain entities come predefined in HTML and XHMTL, and entities can be declared for XML documents, but in plain text messages su

Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly" apostrophe

On Sunday, October 11, 2015, Philip Taylor wrote: > > > Tom Livingston wrote: > > > > > I only saw superscripted numbers as well, and I have my doubts that > > > ios9.x gmail client can't display unicode... > > > > Saw only superscripted numbers in whose/which message, Tom ? > > P

Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly" apostrophe

Tom Livingston wrote: > > I only saw superscripted numbers as well, and I have my doubts that > > ios9.x gmail client can't display unicode... > > Saw only superscripted numbers in whose/which message, Tom ? > Philip Taylor > > Jeff gates first reply. Jeff sent in ISO-8859-1

Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly" apostrophe

On Sunday, October 11, 2015, Philip Taylor wrote: > > > Tom Livingston wrote: > > > I only saw superscripted numbers as well, and I have my doubts that > > ios9.x gmail client can't display unicode... > > Saw only superscripted numbers in whose/which message, Tom ? > Philip Taylor > Jeff gates

Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly" apostrophe

Tom Livingston wrote: > I only saw superscripted numbers as well, and I have my doubts that > ios9.x gmail client can't display unicode... Saw only superscripted numbers in whose/which message, Tom ? Philip Taylor __ css-discus

Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly" apostrophe

On Sunday, October 11, 2015, Philip Taylor wrote: > > > Chris Williams wrote: > > > [Can you] explain then, your email of yesterday where you explain that > you said > > Explain what, Chris ? I sent a plain text message in UTF-8 which read : > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Cont

Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly" apostrophe

Chris Williams wrote: > [Can you] explain then, your email of yesterday where you explain that you > said Explain what, Chris ? I sent a plain text message in UTF-8 which read : > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > > > > Gates, Jeff wrote: > >> In

Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly" apostrophe

Explain then, your email of yesterday where you explain that you said --- Hmmm, what I see are superscript 3, 2 & 1 in that order, followed by a prime. What I now think you meant is : Instead of a “tick” mark for an apostrophe, I¹d like a mark like you see here: ’ I know of no way of accomplish

Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly" apostrophe

Chris Williams wrote: > My larger point was, tread carefully here. Test a lot. Unexpected > results (as Jeff sees in his simple email to this list) are likely. If one has to tread carefully for characters as commonplace and straightforward as curly quotation marks, what hope has one if one wa

Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly" apostrophe

Perhaps. But browsers are not the only place where your text is interpreted. Witness the fact that in my mail program all I'm seeing for his "preferred" characters are (as you also note) superscript characters. This is presumably because his email is being converted to ASCII characters (it's a no

Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly" apostrophe

Chris Williams wrote: > 1) These characters are font dependent. Unless you are specifically > calling out fonts that you use, you risk using glyphs that will not be > found on your target machine. My understanding (and I may be wrong) is that if a modern browser is called on to display a glyph

Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly" apostrophe

On 10/9/15, 12:35 PM, "css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org on behalf of Chris Williams" wrote: >You mean the one that shows up as an unknown character on many platforms? >For reference either a superscript 3 or 1 in my email below... > >1) These characters are font dependent. Unless you are spec

Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly" apostrophe

Gates, Jeff wrote: > Instead of a ³tick² mark for an apostrophe, I¹d like a mark like you see > here: ¹ > This: ¹ Not this: ' Hmmm, what I see are superscript 3, 2 & 1 in that order, followed by a prime. What I now think you meant is : Instead of a “tick” mark for an apostrophe, I¹d like a ma

Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly" apostrophe

You mean the one that shows up as an unknown character on many platforms? For reference either a superscript 3 or 1 in my email below... 1) These characters are font dependent. Unless you are specifically calling out fonts that you use, you risk using glyphs that will not be found on your target

Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly" apostrophe

On 10/9/15, 12:20 PM, "Philip Taylor" wrote > > >Gates, Jeff wrote: > >> Is there a way I can use css to replace all dump apostrophes with curly >> ones ? > >Google has never heard of "dump apostrophe(s)" (and neither have I), so >I regret that I can't help with this one. > >Philip Taylor Inst

Re: [css-d] CSS solution for a "curly" apostrophe

Gates, Jeff wrote: > Is there a way I can use css to replace all dump apostrophes with curly > ones ? Google has never heard of "dump apostrophe(s)" (and neither have I), so I regret that I can't help with this one. Philip Taylor ___

Re: [css-d] css for Android only?

On Mon, 07 Sep 2015 20:07:08 +0100, Philip Taylor wrote: >MiB wrote: > >> sep 3 2015 16:16 marie-ange.demeulemees...@bnpparibasfortis.com: >> >>> The only way to detect Android is [J]avaS[c]ript. >> >> It’s kinda pointless attempting to do this yourself as there are frameworks >> for this, als

Re: [css-d] css for Android only?

And unfortunately when everyone uses a framework and does not learn how that framework actually works because they never took the time to learn on their own, you end up with sub par implementations of said framework. Just Look at Flash. Main reason it bombed is because of the programmers not l

Re: [css-d] css for Android only?

7 sep 2015 kl. 21:07 skrev Philip Taylor : > > > MiB wrote: > >> sep 3 2015 16:16 marie-ange.demeulemees...@bnpparibasfortis.com: >> >>> The only way to detect Android is [J]avaS[c]ript. >> >> It’s kinda pointless attempting to do this yourself as there are frameworks >> for this, also comm

Re: [css-d] css for Android only?

MiB wrote: > sep 3 2015 16:16 marie-ange.demeulemees...@bnpparibasfortis.com: > >> The only way to detect Android is [J]avaS[c]ript. > > It’s kinda pointless attempting to do this yourself as there are frameworks > for this, also commercial. I would respectfully disagree. It is /never/ poi

Re: [css-d] css for Android only?

sep 3 2015 16:16 marie-ange.demeulemees...@bnpparibasfortis.com: > The only way to detect Android is javaSript. It’s kinda pointless attempting to do this yourself as there are frameworks for this, also commercial. __ css-dis

Re: [css-d] css for Android only?

, September 03, 2015 2:41 PM To: DEMEULEMEESTER Marie-Ange Subject: Re: [css-d] css for Android only? Hi, If all you need to do is detect an Android device. This is what I use and it has proven very handy. It is javascript so I wont post to the board, but is a few lines of JS and doesn't hurt dow

Re: [css-d] css for Android only?

> On Sep 3, 2015, at 18:35, marie-ange.demeulemees...@bnpparibasfortis.com > wrote: > > Is there a way to use css that only works for Android devices? > In fact I have to hide the print button for Android devices only. Not that I know about (and many CSS hacks are probably unreliable, affecting

Re: [css-d] css validation error

> Le 1 juil. 2015 à 02:59, Mike Manley a écrit : > > All css validates except this part. > "css error = Unknown pseudo-element or pseudo-class :required" > … > > In the css I have this > input:required, textarea:required{add styles} > > From all the information I have been able to find (which i

Re: [css-d] css validation error

Ryan Reese wrote: > The validator basically doesn't know that it's valid CSS. It's not > updated. Ignore the error :). It might be helpful, Ryan, if you could provide a link to the relevant part of the W3C CSS specification(s); that way, both the original poster and other members of the list

Re: [css-d] css validation error

The validator basically doesn't know that it's valid CSS. It's not updated. Ignore the error :). On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Mike Manley wrote: > I need a little help understanding this error. > > All css validates except this part. > "css error = Unknown pseudo-element or pseudo-class :req

Re: [css-d] css masking

On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Crest Christopher wrote: > I see you made mask separate, class within a class, give it another shot ! > Are you saying *you* will give it another shot, or are we supposed to be looking at something new you did? -- Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer |

Re: [css-d] css masking

I see you made mask separate, class within a class, give it another shot ! Philippe Wittenbergh Thursday, June 04, 2015 10:23 PM There are quite a few typos in your fiddle… And your generated element will do nothing because it is empty. At a minimum, you’d need to add

Re: [css-d] css masking

On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > > I got something working in both Safari 8 and Opera 29: > http://dev.l-c-n.com/_junk/mask.html Working in latest Chrome Mac as well... -- Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic | ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518

Re: [css-d] css masking

> Le 5 juin 2015 à 10:23, Crest Christopher a > écrit : > > A while ago I posted I couldn't get masking to work; here is my example > . I had the mask rule within the > class = two, but it wasn't working, I decided, even though it won't be > remov

Re: [css-d] css masking

.two:after rule has typo. On Thursday, June 4, 2015, Crest Christopher wrote: > A while ago I posted I couldn't get masking to work; here is my example < > https://jsfiddle.net/WildWind/bs84tegs/11/>. I had the mask rule within > the class = two, but it wasn't working, I decided, even though

Re: [css-d] CSS Grids (Tom Livingston)

> > Message: 24 > Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 15:16:23 -0400 > From: Tom Livingston > To: CSS Discussion Group > Subject: [css-d] CSS Grids > Message-ID: > < > calxy60ywwugfudu5uu2zxuus+3ilvkroltfzu6s2rbfozh3...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > List, > > I have not

Re: [css-d] CSS Grids

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:37 PM, Chris Williams wrote: > If you buy into a "grid" the idea is you go all the way. Everything lives > in the grid. That way you get all the responsiveness (and other) benefits > of the grid structure. And when nesting columns, the same number of columns is inside

Re: [css-d] CSS Grids

If you buy into a "grid" the idea is you go all the way. Everything lives in the grid. That way you get all the responsiveness (and other) benefits of the grid structure. On 3/12/15, 12:16 PM, "Tom Livingston" wrote: > >I have not used a grid system in the past but am looking into them. As >I w

Re: [css-d] CSS Validation Error ?

URL ? Crest Christopher wrote: Hi, I need help with a CSS error __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- h

Re: [css-d] CSS Particle Transition (Example of Effect)

It is neat :-) I'll move the question over to another list :) Christopher Tom Livingston Thursday, November 20, 2014 5:09 PM Tom Livingston Thursday, November 20, 2014 5:08 PM Please try the webdesign-l list. That example is done with script.

Re: [css-d] CSS Particle Transition (Example of Effect)

Neat though ;-) > On Thu Nov 20 2014 at 4:51:17 PM Crest Christopher < > crestchristop...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I want to do an effect similar to this >> , except the breaks up >> into particles and transitions to another . I hope I'm understood ? >>

Re: [css-d] CSS Particle Transition (Example of Effect)

Please try the webdesign-l list. That example is done with script. This list is for CSS. http://www.webdesign-l.com/ On Thu Nov 20 2014 at 4:51:17 PM Crest Christopher < crestchristop...@gmail.com> wrote: > I want to do an effect similar to this > , e

Re: [css-d] CSS Sprite Sheets

I will need alphas for the drop shadow which will have some opacity ! Christopher Karl Monday, November 17, 2014 12:32 AM If you don't plan to use any of the individual frames elsewhere, why not just a good old .gif? You can embed your timings, it's a single fil

Re: [css-d] CSS Shapes

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > > Le 4 sept. 2014 à 21:32, Tom Livingston a écrit : > > > No doubt this will be something I'm asked to do in a page layout soon. I > > was just watching this demo of a new Chrome extension: > > > > http://razvancaliman.com/writing/css

Re: [css-d] CSS Shapes

Le 4 sept. 2014 à 21:32, Tom Livingston a écrit : > No doubt this will be something I'm asked to do in a page layout soon. I > was just watching this demo of a new Chrome extension: > > http://razvancaliman.com/writing/css-shapes-editor-chrome/ > > A very handy thing indeed, but... my first th

Re: [css-d] CSS Shapes

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Tom Livingston wrote: > Good morning fellow listers, > > CSS Shapes. > > No doubt this will be something I'm asked to do in a page layout soon. I > was just watching this demo of a new Chrome extension: > > http://razvancaliman.com/writing/css-shapes-editor-chrome/

Re: [css-d] CSS drop-down menu issues

Hi John, Try replacing these declarations. I "think" this is what your wanting. /* new header nav */ #main_nav{ /* border:1px solid red; */ /* border:1px solid rgb(255,255,255); */ /* float:left; */ /* width:100%; */ } #main_nav ul{ list-style-type:non

Re: [css-d] CSS drop-down menu issues

> Compare your page in FF, Chrome, and Opera. First place to start is to > validate the markup. You’re right..thank you..I need to get into the habit of doing that as with using Firebug to help find issues.. I keep thinking of validating as what you do when you’re done yet “getting done” involv

Re: [css-d] CSS drop-down menu issues

On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 8:11 PM, John wrote: > At this link, > http://www.coffeeonmars.com/screenshots/menu-prob/product.php I am having > issues with the header nav in that I feel I’ve done a lot of kludges to get > it to behave correctly and not explode the page.. > > ...such as giving a white

Re: [css-d] CSS code - is this right?

aug 14 2014 23:19 John D : > Not sure I understand your post but span can be given a class and the code is > attributing to that class. Is this what your view is about Joomla? If you have a span element, that is a type of element already in the HTML language, then there’s no need to specify t

Re: [css-d] CSS code - is this right?

Actually, the code says an element with a class of 'span' will be selected. Kinda poor. On Thursday, August 14, 2014, John D wrote: > Not sure I understand your post but span can be given a class and the > code is attributing to that class. Is this what your view is about > Joomla? > > > > > >

Re: [css-d] CSS code - is this right?

Not sure I understand your post but span can be given a class and the code is attributing to that class. Is this what your view is about Joomla? > > I guess those semantics (using elements as class names) sums up my view of > Joomla very well. >

Re: [css-d] CSS code - is this right?

Yes, you are correct. Though, for practical purposes, I wouldn’t generally recommend creating a class name called span. On Aug 14, 2014, at 18:21, Tom Livingston wrote: > Nice article Frank. > > Just so I'm tracking this right - as I've not used this very much - > given this example: > > [

Re: [css-d] CSS code - is this right?

14 aug 2014 kl. 18:21 skrev Tom Livingston : > [class*="span”] I guess those semantics (using elements as class names) sums up my view of Joomla very well. __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.o

Re: [css-d] CSS code - is this right?

Nice article Frank. Just so I'm tracking this right - as I've not used this very much - given this example: [class*="span"] This means "select elements who's class contains the word 'span'". Correct? On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Frank Taylor wrote: > Yes, that’s correct. It’s the attribu

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >