[Dbmail-dev] Re: Compile Error

2006-05-29 Thread Thomas Mueller
Paul, It's a typo Aaron. Missing hyphen after the NAME line in dbmail-timsieved.txt. I fixed this last week, but your serveropts cleanup overwrote it. SVN rev 2139 still fails: xmlto man dbmail-smtp.xml Writing dbmail.1 for refentry test -z /usr/share/man/man1 || mkdir -p --

[Dbmail-dev] automake error

2006-05-18 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi, I try to build packages of current svn 2121 for Debian Sarge, but I fail because of an automake error: autoreconf -i Putting files in AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR, `buildtools'. automake: configure.in: installing `buildtools/install-sh' automake: configure.in: installing `buildtools/mkinstalldirs'

[Dbmail-dev] Re: [DBMail 0000338]: The header indication is broken in some MUA. some MUA.

2006-05-03 Thread Thomas Mueller
Kevin wrote: If only that were legal. Maximum width for varchar is 255. Is this a limit of mysql? I don't think pgsql has such a limit, and oracle might be 2000. Pg limit is 1 GB (data, so UTF-8 worst case is 500 MB), Oracle 9i has 4000 Byte. Thomas

[Dbmail-dev] Re: daemonize

2006-03-08 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Geo, But even working init.d scripts and working daemons can be killed or stopped for lots of reasons, and unless you duplicate the work of init, or manually intervene, they won't start back up. I read that argument several times now but I still think init doesn't help here. I have to

[Dbmail-dev] Re: PostgreSQL error handling

2006-02-20 Thread Thomas Mueller
Aaron Stone wrote: I managed to forget to add the replycache table to my database, so the query failed the first time. The second time, the query didn't just fail, it was ignored. This continues even for queries to tables that exist, until the end of the process. [..] [ERROR: current

[Dbmail-dev] Re: STORE is SLOOOOOW on folder with many, many messages

2005-12-17 Thread Thomas Mueller
Geo Carncross wrote: On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 17:35 +0100, Thomas Mueller wrote: Geo Carncross wrote: I completely agree with this. There's just the problem of databases being a moving target. Remember we talked about COUNT(*) not being optimally implemented in Pg, but one day it could

[Dbmail-dev] Re: STORE is SLOOOOOW on folder with many, many messages

2005-12-15 Thread Thomas Mueller
Geo Carncross wrote: I completely agree with this. There's just the problem of databases being a moving target. Remember we talked about COUNT(*) not being optimally implemented in Pg, but one day it could be, and at that point, we should use COUNT(*) - even if it's slower on older database

[Dbmail-dev] Re: PostgreSQL + non-ASCII encoding

2005-11-01 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Robert, Is the expense concern the computational complexity (escaping for SQL), the primary storage use (malloc'ing 5*READ_BLOCK_SIZE), or secondary storage use (not exploiting PostgreSQL's text compression)? Perhaps the first two of these could be addressed by using PostgreSQL's

[Dbmail-dev] Re: PostgreSQL + non-ASCII encoding

2005-10-30 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Robert, Here's the patch.. I don't think that's a solution but a (expensive) workaround. The problem is: Postgres compresses text but stores bytea as it is. In future it would be interesting to search on message bodies as well. What about converting every string to UTF-8 and use a UTF-8

[Dbmail-dev] Re: patch for postgresql to work in UNICODE encoding.

2005-09-17 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hello, Would this utf-8 mode for postgres be useful as the default setup for postgres users? According to following URL, the default character set is selected with the locale setting of initdb execution environment. Sorry, I misunderstood your question at first. This patch is useful for

[Dbmail-dev] Re: scoreboard_release: fatal: unable to find this pid on the scoreboard

2005-08-19 Thread Thomas Mueller
Paul J Stevens wrote: Paul J Stevens wrote: Thomas Mueller wrote: I had as many connections as running processes (a lot below MAXCHILDREN). The problem was: no one could connect any more. Looks like a problem with starting new processes - every running process handled a connection yet, no new

[Dbmail-dev] Re: scoreboard_release: fatal: unable to find this pid on the scoreboard

2005-08-18 Thread Thomas Mueller
in the debian package) all pop3d and lmtpd were stopped, the imapd processes were still there. So I did a 'killall dbmail-imapd' and installed svn rev 1852. Thomas Thomas Mueller wrote: Hi, I got this one: Aug 17 09:11:20 geht-schon dbmail/imap4d[16011]: pool.c:scoreboard_release: fatal: unable

[Dbmail-dev] scoreboard_release: fatal: unable to find this pid on the scoreboard

2005-08-17 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi, I got this one: Aug 17 09:11:20 geht-schon dbmail/imap4d[16011]: pool.c:scoreboard_release: fatal: unable to find this pid on the scoreboard I use subversion revision 1848 - as far as I know the fixes for the pooling code are in there yet? Thomas

[Dbmail-dev] trunk Pg version doesn't compile

2005-07-26 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi, there are two problems: make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/dbmail2-2.1.1/pgsql' /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile i386-linux-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I/usr/include/postgresql -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -O2 -g -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include

[Dbmail-dev] Re: trunk Pg version doesn't compile

2005-07-26 Thread Thomas Mueller
Aaron Stone wrote: On Tue, Jul 26, 2005, Igor Stroh [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Thomas Mueller wrote: dbpgsql.c: In function `db_connect': dbpgsql.c:80: warning: implicit declaration of function `PQServerVersion' dbpgsql.c:83: warning: implicit declaration of function `pg_encoding_to_char' dbpgsql.c

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Replace unique_id with GUIDfor Load BalancingFailover

2005-05-27 Thread Thomas Mueller
Geo Carncross wrote: The clock idea would work if the clocks could be kept synchronized, but that's just not possible. It's very hard work to get machines on a LAN synchronized within 10msec, and clocks can NEVER go backwards. Not even a little bit or mail will be lost until UIDVALIDITY

Re: [Dbmail-dev] libsieve support

2005-05-13 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi, how far is the libsieve thing going? i would be very interested in see this running ;) Don't hold your breath. I need someone to help me finish the API for libSieve, at which point it will be trivial to re-integrate into DBMail; all of the Sieve infrastructure was completed long ago and

Re: [Dbmail-dev] One very slow query left -- RESULTS (finally)

2005-05-01 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Geo, sorry for the long delay, I've been very busy and had some problems with the new clustering feature of the Debian package (some are still left). I've installed a PostgreSQL 8.0.1 in a chroot, converted the 7.4.7 configs as far as possible, did a pg_dumpall of 7.4 and imported that in

Re: [Dbmail-dev] One very slow query left -- RESULTS (finally)

2005-03-17 Thread Thomas Mueller
Geo Carncross wrote: Time to buy new hardware Thomas: That's not what I wanted hear :-) -- Merge Join (cost=0.00..726.83 rows=6245

Re: [Dbmail-dev] One very slow query left

2005-03-15 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Geo, I've got 6000 messages here, and subsecond queries; here's the EXACT query: [..] Nested Loop (cost=0.00..46.85 rows=2 width=36) Could you please always do an EXPLAIN ANALYZE? Your output only shows what the planer expects without doing the query. With EXPLAIN ANALYZE you get the

Re: [Dbmail-dev] One very slow query left

2005-03-15 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Aaron, On MySQL: 4543 rows in set (0.28 sec) 41573 rows in set (1.69 sec) So if this fixes it for Pg, then I think we've got a winner :-) 'in set' means 4543 results? Is there something like explain analyze in MySQL too? Could you please post results? 0,04 ms per result in case of

Re: [Dbmail-dev] One very slow query left

2005-03-15 Thread Thomas Mueller
Geo Carncross wrote: On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 13:49 +0100, Thomas Mueller wrote: I have 7.4.7 too. The results are MUCH better than what dbmail does at the moment so it's a real improvement. I don't know if it can be done better. The query on the mailbox with ~600 Mails (that's quite common I

Re: [Dbmail-dev] One very slow query left

2005-03-11 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Kevin, SELECT seen_flag, answered_flag, deleted_flag, flagged_flag, draft_flag, recent_flag, TO_CHAR(internal_date, '-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS' ), rfcsize, message_idnr FROM dbmail_messages msg, dbmail_physmessage pm WHERE pm.id = msg.physmessage_id AND message_idnr BETWEEN '1' AND '417966' AND

Re: [Dbmail-dev] One very slow query left

2005-03-11 Thread Thomas Mueller
Geo Carncross wrote: DROP the index for dbmail_messages_physmessage_idx - I think Pg is selecting it because it has less collisions, the other one just isn't being used. I'd like an explain of it AFTER the index drop too (remember to REINDEX and do a VACUUM ANALYZE) Sorry this will be little

Re: [Dbmail-dev] One very slow query left

2005-03-11 Thread Thomas Mueller
Geo Carncross wrote: This is going to take longer than I thought- my data set is too small, and Pg is taking a completely different set of execution plans. Thanks a lot for your help! Need more data... Will try and scrounge some up. When I did tests I imported some mbox archives of mailing

[Dbmail-dev] One very slow query left

2005-03-10 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi, now I have only one slow query left - unfortunately I have no idea why it is that slow. The mailbox contains ~1800 mails. It takes 45 seconds to open it: SELECT seen_flag, answered_flag, deleted_flag, flagged_flag, draft_flag, recent_flag, TO_CHAR(internal_date, '-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS' ),

Re: [Dbmail-dev] One very slow query left

2005-03-10 Thread Thomas Mueller
Geo Carncross wrote: The dbmail_messages_physmessage_idx isn't the best index to use. You have several options: put extra columns in dbmail_physmessage that reference the message_idnr and mailbox_idnr (and index them WITH the dbmail_physmessage.id) -- THEN adapt the query to look for

Re: [Dbmail-dev] One very slow query left

2005-03-10 Thread Thomas Mueller
Geo Carncross wrote: On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 21:16 +0100, Thomas Mueller wrote: CREATE INDEX dbmail_messages_wide ON dbmail_messages (mailbox_idnr,message_idnr,status); CREATE INDEX dbmail_messages_wider ON dbmail_messages (mailbox_idnr,message_idnr,status,physmessage_id); [..] That one

[Dbmail-dev] dbmail-pgsql horrible slow

2005-03-09 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi, I get more and more user complaints that my IMAP server is terrible slow, opening a mailbox takes very long. I've analyzed that using PQA (http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pqa/, great tool!), the output is attached if anyone is interested (includes all databases, not only dbmail). The main

Re: [Dbmail-dev] dbmail-pgsql horrible slow

2005-03-09 Thread Thomas Mueller
Paul J Stevens wrote: Thomas Mueller wrote: The main problem is in db.c, db_getmailbox(): SELECT COUNT(message_idnr), COUNT(message_idnr) - SUM(seen_flag), SUM(recent_flag) FROM dbmail_messages WHERE mailbox_idnr = '5' AND status '2' That query takes up to 15 seconds (!!). That query

Re: [Dbmail-dev] dbmail-pgsql horrible slow

2005-03-09 Thread Thomas Mueller
Paul J Stevens wrote: Geo Carncross wrote: 'q',COUNT(*) as the request for each. This was a minor note. The result would then be three separate rows, second column being the interesting part. Fixing the query thus, and adding the needed indexes result in *really* fast returns on mysql,

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Outstanding bugs before 2.0.4

2005-02-06 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Aaron, Hey, so I moved the ACL and mailbox performance bugs up to eventually, maybe in 2.0 and left just these three items outstanding before 2.0.4: * Bug 134: Some MySQL tweaks to be applied. * Bug 161: dbmail-smtp SIG11 on following message. * Bug 164: No more mailbox

Re: [Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000159]: alias bug: if user exists, auth_check_user is skipped

2005-01-14 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Aaron, The change that we'd need is to check the aliases table, too, and abide by it if the delivery address is a forward. I'll repost this on the mailing list, too -- but are there any semantics that would be ruined if we changed from: if (address is username) put

Re: [Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000159]: alias bug: if user exists, auth_check_user is skipped

2005-01-14 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi, I don't consider it silly to have one table with ALL valid email addresses, so you don't have to do double lookups. If that is required for external software it can easily be done with a view that contains dbmail_aliases and dbmail_users. Furthermore, I consider it a feature not to

Re: [Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000159]: alias bug: if user exists, auth_check_user is skipped

2005-01-14 Thread Thomas Mueller
Aaron Stone wrote: On Fri, Jan 14, 2005, Thomas Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Currently: if (address is username) put username on delivery list else if (address has aliases) resolve aliases into deliveries and forwards Aaron's Proposal: if (address has

Re: [Dbmail-dev] OT: Postgresql problem

2004-12-22 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Hans, I have database with ~560.000 rows. One of the columns is an IP address (type:inet). Now, I want to only get the unique ip addresses out. That takes about 3minutes on a P4 2.66Ghz! I don't know the PostgreSQL Code, I can only tell you from database theory. - a database uses an index

Re: [Dbmail-dev] imapd memory usage

2004-12-08 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Aaron, At the moment queries seem to be spread over dbmail. Is it hard to use a more layered approach with a defined storage layer? The retrieval api must indeed be totally opaque, while still allowing full control over retrieval-conditions. Returning cursors where possible, and

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Status Reports

2004-11-13 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Paul, Some of my plans for 2.1: [..] Could you keep that information in the wiki? That's probably easier to maintain than (regular) status mails and more current. Maybe divided into three section: - done/changed since last release - to be done until next release - known problems with

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Quick benchmark of LIKE vs. REGEXP in MySQL

2004-11-05 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Paul, This might be important if you're searching for uncommon headers. Of course, uncommon headers probably also mean that they're uncommonly searched for... Don't count on it. Offlineimap is a common client for syncing imap-instances. It uses it's own header-type where both key and

Re: [Dbmail-dev] performance of speedup patches

2004-10-29 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi, But I also have a simpler idea that will still speed things up. It involves using a regexp SQL fulltext search. While it's definitely slow compared to a changed storage (the db won't be able to use indexes), it's still faster because it does not involve any parsing, and uses the

Re: [Dbmail-dev] performance of speedup patches

2004-10-29 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Aaron, But I also have a simpler idea that will still speed things up. It involves using a regexp SQL fulltext search. While it's definitely slow compared to a changed storage (the db won't be able to use indexes), it's still faster because it does not involve any parsing, and uses

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Re: Dbmail Postgres Database Inconsistencies...

2004-10-06 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi, That is on a Dual 1Ghz P3, 1gb ram [..] sort_mem = 65536 # min 64, size in KB Depending on the usage of your database this is a very high value. Every sort (including internal sort for merge joins p.e.) is allowed to take 64 MB. If one query needs three sorts, that query is allowed

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Re: Dbmail Postgres Database Inconsistencies...

2004-10-04 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi, The art is in SQL, not the engine. Definitely not - if your engine doesn't support p.e. transactions that's it, even the most clever application and developer can't do anything to get a transaction safe program. Since I'm working in a company which is developing customized database

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Re: Dbmail Postgres Database Inconsistencies...

2004-10-04 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Paul, I have one question left: I have a project with a very low budget (because it's private) and need a database with multimaster synchronisation, what should I use? Afaik, mysql supports multi-master replication just fine. Doesn't that suit your purpose ? Probably it does yes, I

[Dbmail-dev] cvs head: imapd doesn't accept new connections

2004-09-22 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi, I'm running cvs version from 18.09. This morning imapd suddenly didn't accept any new connections. netstat -t -ap 21 |grep dbmail-imapd |grep ESTABLISHED |grep -v localhost:postgresql |wc -l Reported 15 established connections. ps -ef |grep dbmail-imapd |grep -v grep |wc -l Reported 17

Re: [Dbmail-dev] current cvs head doesn't compiles under freebsd 5.2.1

2004-09-14 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Paul, I don't get it. Why doesn't freebsd like this code? code void manage_stop_children() { /* * * cleanup all remaining forked processes * */ trace(TRACE_MESSAGE, %s,%s: General stop requested. Killing children.. ,

[Dbmail-dev] ACLs: anyone user

2004-09-11 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi, I have a problem with anyone ACLs: using mutt I can change to: imaps://server/#Users/myuser/INBOX/mailbox When I try to select the folder in Thunderbirds 'manage folder subscriptions' the user isn't even listed. So 'anyone' ACLs seems to work, but 'anyone' folders aren't listed if a client

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Firebird backend

2004-09-11 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi, A numrows() solution will be the quick way to a first version, but we may discover that the performance is terrible and 'SELECT COUNT(*)' is needed. [..] The advantage is, that we can initalize more resultsets, not have to allocate memory and not have to query count(*) statements. Please

[Dbmail-dev] cvs head: pool.h is missing

2004-09-10 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi, server.c requires pool.h but the file is missing. Thomas -- http://www.tmueller.com for pgp key (95702B3B)

[Dbmail-dev] CVS HEAD: little error

2004-09-09 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi, it's not worth it to add that to the bugtracker. Could someone please apply the following patch: --- pipe.c.orig 2004-09-07 13:51:23.0 + +++ pipe.c 2004-09-08 21:16:38.0 + @@ -522,7 +522,8 @@ /* first start a new database transaction */ if

[Dbmail-dev] ACLs: 'anyone' not implemented ?

2004-08-23 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi, RFC 2086 defines the special user 'anyone' to change rights for every user (for example make a mailbox readable for every user - that's what I try to do). Am I right that 'anyone' isn't implemented yet? Thomas -- http://www.tmueller.com for pgp key (95702B3B)

Re: [Dbmail-dev] dbmail IMAP server info: this message could not be

2004-08-20 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Ilja, I've added a small patch in the bugtracker that will set the postmaster address (as taken from dbmail.conf) as the From: address. I'll also attach it here. This does not doing anything else though.. Can you people test this? Doesn't work, the from field is empty. I haven't

[Dbmail-dev] dbmail IMAP server info: this message could not be parsed

2004-08-19 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi, I get about 20 mails a week like this one: from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] subject: dbmail IMAP server info: this message could not be parsed The message body is the mail that could not be parsed (normally spam with strange mime parts). Is it possible to set another sender (the admin of the

Re: [Dbmail-dev] heads up for rc8?

2004-08-17 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Ilja, On the other hand... It's probably more useful to release first, and fix LDAP support later. LDAP is a big thing, and might better wait until after release. Yes - there are always new features/enhancements/what-ever that would be nice to have in 2.0 but if everything is accepted

[Dbmail-dev] How to migrate PostgreSQL to table name prefixes?

2004-08-15 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi, does anyone have a sql script to migrate a PostgreSQL database to table name prefixes (it would be a good habit to only commit changes if there is a script to migrate the database) ? I tried the following: ALTER TABLE acl RENAME TO dbmail_acl; ALTER TABLE aliases RENAME TO dbmail_aliases;

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Re: current cvs version performance

2004-08-06 Thread Thomas Mueller
Sergey Spiridonov wrote: I converted to dbmail_* by hand just yesterday also. I'm using postgres, and for postgres explain differs: This is for Postgres 7.4.2: dbmail=# explain SELECT messageblk FROM dbmail_messageblks LEFT JOIN dbmail_messages USING (physmessage_id) WHERE

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Roadmap to 2.0 changes now in CVS

2004-07-22 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Aaron, Will you change static 'dbmail_' to a configurable prefix? I for example have the problem that I use dbmail tables from several other programs (config GUI, MTA, web server, ftp server, ...) so I can't simply rename the tables. It is exactly because of these ancillary

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Roadmap to 2.0 changes now in CVS

2004-07-21 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Aaron, Please note that you will have to rename your tables to add a dbmail_ prefix. I wrote a script to do that, but haven't integrated it into the sql scripts. http://dbmail.org/index.php?page=development says that 'Customisable table names/prefixes' are planed for 2.1. Will you change

[Dbmail-dev] database changes for release candidates

2004-07-16 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi, I've posted that for RC6 yet but got no response: I think we should provide scripts to migrate the database at least between RCs, better for every change in cvs. These are for postgres: -- -- v1.28 - v1.29 BEGIN TRANSACTION;

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Deep table changes in 2.1?

2004-07-10 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Aaron, Release early, release often. Add to that maintain compatibility along your production branches ... or offer a safe and easy way to migrate. I'm no friend of collecting a huge number of changes and release rarely - I prefer releasing after every single change. We have to

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Deep table changes in 2.1?

2004-07-09 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Ilja, for 2.0, we'd only like to see 2 changes: 1. table names prefixed with 'dbmail_' 2. command line options sane. [..] Since we've violated all rules of release practise anyway, me might just get behind the keyboard and do it I don't think it's a good idea to change (1.) now because

Re: [Dbmail-dev] dbmail 2.0 rc6

2004-06-13 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Ilja, There's a small change in the database structure. The messageblks table has a field called is_header, which is set to '1' if the messageblock is a header block. This field isn't used yet, but will be in future releases. Could we please add a upgrade file for every database? Entries

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Missing postgres index

2004-06-01 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Ilja, Isn't the simplest solution this: change the query for the special case of 'INBOX' to: SELECT mailbox_idnr FROM mailboxes WHERE name = 'INBOX' and owner_idnr = '%llu'; We always store 'INBOX' as 'INBOX' (all caps), so, this will always work. And we have no problem with

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Re: [Dbmail] internal_delivery_user and curmail_size bottleneck...

2004-06-01 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Aaron, We have two classes of programs: - lmtpd, smtpd, pop3d: before we do anything with a message BEGIN, if we return SUCCESS to the client COMMIT, else ROLLBACK - should be quite easy? - imapd: for every IMAP operation: - if it's a read only one leave everything as

[Dbmail-dev] Re: [Dbmail] dbmai - 100% processor

2004-05-31 Thread Thomas Mueller
The company I work for has dbmail running on duel processor SuSE amd64 machines. For the most part we have had great success with dbmail, but every once in a great while it seems as if there is something that pushes dbmail to 100% of one of the processors completely blocking it. Yes

Re: [Dbmail-dev] imapd lockup

2004-05-19 Thread Thomas Mueller
While copying lot of messages to dbmail suddenly no new connection was possible, imapd didn't respond any more. Anyone any idea what I could do? dbmail 2 is now my primary IMAP server (gets a copy of mails of the former primary) and everything works very well - except when I copy a large

[Dbmail-dev] imapd lockup

2004-05-16 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi, I did several tests with current dbmail cvs with trace level 3 for imapd. While copying lot of messages to dbmail suddenly no new connection was possible, imapd didn't respond any more. The last sign of life was: May 16 14:55:37 geht-schon dbmail/imap4d[3825]: dbpgsql.c,db_free_result:

[Dbmail-dev] trace output fix

2004-05-12 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi, could someone please apply the attached patch? It removes the ^M from trace line ends in syslog. Thanks! Thomas -- http://www.tmueller.com for pgp key (95702B3B) --- imapcommands.c.orig 2004-04-27 07:16:49.0 + +++ imapcommands.c 2004-05-11 20:31:45.0 + @@

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Re: [Dbmail] mailbox2dbmail / imapsync

2004-05-11 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Aaron, Wait, scratch that one moment, there was one thing I was worried about, INBOX. In db.c and in imapcommand.c, there are a couple of str[n?]casecmp's with INBOX and inbox as the parameters. Thomas, try using your patch and creating a mailbox called Inbox and inbox and see what

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Re: [Dbmail] mailbox2dbmail / imapsync

2004-05-10 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Paul, Sounds like a valid bug to me. Could you perhaps submit the directory layout that triggers this? Perhaps I can reproduce this bug with the imap testsuite I'm constructing, so we can fix this pronto. [..] But with dbmail it only works for a while and then skips the rest with an

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Re: [Dbmail] mailbox2dbmail / imapsync

2004-05-10 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Ilja, I would think so, unless we've already made assumptions on the mailbox names being case insensitive. I'll give it a spin. I've just tried it on PostgreSQL, which is case sensitive in varchar fields. I can create mailboxes with names only different in case there. That's

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Re: [Dbmail] mailbox2dbmail / imapsync

2004-05-10 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Ilja, dbmail should be case sensitive I think, because the most wide spread imap servers like Cyrus are. I agree, but I think we should wait until after the release of 2.0 to change this. That's an important feature to be able to transfer from another imap server to dbmail so it's

Re: [Dbmail-dev] pipe.c still have problem, maybe.

2004-05-07 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Ilja, can you try it with the newest version (v1.122) of pipe.c? I tried that hoping it will solve the problems with MS Outlook (I wrote a mail about that on 2004.04.22) but the problems are still. I've sent a mail using Squirrelmail to dbmail. When Outlook displays it the header fields

Re: [Dbmail-dev] ringbuf in store_message_temp()

2004-05-06 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Ilja, I've added a macro MOD(x,y) to pipe.c which calculates the modulo of x with respect y. It also works when x is negative. I've tested that version but I still get a . at the end of each message. echo test |mail -s test myuser Is enough to get it. Thomas -- http://www.tmueller.com

Re: [Dbmail-dev] all mails end with a period

2004-05-04 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Blake, Currently all my messages have a trailing period on it's own line on the end of them. Current CVS, Postfix 2, LMTP. I have the same problem with exim4 and lmtp. Thomas -- http://www.tmueller.com for pgp key (95702B3B)

Re: [Dbmail-dev] MIME parser bug found and (now totally) fixed!

2004-04-27 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Aaron, The particular email I was looking at was inserted a while ago, using either 2.0-rc3 or 2.0-rc4. The changes that should take care of this problem have been made since 2.0-rc4, so we should be alright. I don't think so. My dbmail is from last week and I managed to break a user

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Error responses from dbmail-lmtp

2004-04-22 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Ilja, There is framework in the dsn structure for providing a message to accompany the specific codes. I wasn't sure how to go about adding the strings, though. Gettext? Config file? Hard coded? If hard coded English is sufficient, I can add them ASAP. I guess hardcoded English

[Dbmail-dev] Problems with MS Outlook

2004-04-22 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi, I did some tests with current cvs and some widespread MUAs - and failed with the most widespread, MicroSoft Outlook (XP if that matters). Everything is fine and can be used, but the messages received are shown with headers in the body. If I copy messages from my Cyrus server to the dbmail

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Re: [Dbmail] imapd question

2004-04-13 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Paul, So chances are pretty slim the code will even work at all with unicode. Seems like a worthy implementation goal. Yes I totally agree. That's why I've asked twice how I could use a unicode Postgres database but I got no response. Any idea?

Re: [Dbmail-dev] dbmail md5 is not md5 from RFC 1321 ?

2004-03-30 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Jesse, dbmail supports both md5 hash and digest. For the digest, try using a type of md5sum instead of md5. The value in the database can actually be in either format if encryption_type is md5 (it looks at the first 3 chars and if it's $1$ it's an md5 hash), but if you tell it to

Re: [Dbmail-dev] dbmail md5 is not md5 from RFC 1321 ?

2004-03-27 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Paul, The difference is between md5-digest, and md5-hash. I don't have any detailed knowlegde of the algorithms involved, though. I searched around the net in case I've missed something in the past but I found nothing new. md5 = message digest 5, md5 is a hash algorithm. There are 3

[Dbmail-dev] INSTALL hint: exim4

2004-03-18 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi, the INSTALL files says nothing about exim4 (maybe it's to simple?): LOCAL_DELIVERY=transport_dbmail Every router with local mail has to use 'transport = LOCAL_DELIVERY' then. Two possible transports: # transport using pipe transport_dbmail: driver = pipe command =

Re: [Dbmail-dev] some speed tests

2004-02-15 Thread Thomas Mueller
said that. [..] But yes, you have perfectly summarised the point of my comment. As a quick speed up that's a good solution yes. But if it's the right permanent solution? -- MfG Thomas Mueller - http://www.tmueller.com for pgp key (95702B3B)

[Dbmail-dev] some speed tests

2004-02-14 Thread Thomas Mueller
mailboxes_lower_name_idx ON mailboxes(lower(name)); Is IMAP case sensitive? Are folders like INBOX/test and INBOX/Test possible? If it's insensitive we could lower() all queries on names and create an index on lower(name). -- MfG Thomas Mueller - http://www.tmueller.com for pgp key (95702B3B

Re: [Dbmail-dev] user_idnr = 0

2004-02-07 Thread Thomas Mueller
' as contact for billing questions to the bill ;-) -- MfG Thomas Mueller - http://www.tmueller.com for pgp key (95702B3B)

Re: [Dbmail-dev] user_idnr = 0

2004-02-06 Thread Thomas Mueller
]@__ user but add an additional column too. What do you think? -- MfG Thomas Mueller - http://www.tmueller.com for pgp key (95702B3B)

Re: [Dbmail-dev] MTA return codes from dbmail-smtp

2004-02-02 Thread Thomas Mueller
..] -- Before I switched to lmtp I only got 'failed' messages without a reason. That's the way dbmail should handle bounces too I think. -- MfG Thomas Mueller - http://www.tmueller.com for pgp key (95702B3B)

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Congrats on 2.0rc1, and a little fix to misc.c

2004-01-31 Thread Thomas Mueller
(): creating new child Jan 30 23:40:10 server dbmail/imap4d[1736]: CreateChild(): signal handler placed, going to perform task now -- Is there anything I can do to help finding this crash? -- MfG Thomas Mueller - http

Re: [Dbmail-dev] cvs: postgresql problems

2003-12-06 Thread Thomas Mueller
: No such attribute shmbx_acc.is_subscribed imapcommands.c ends the logging lines with \r\n this leads to output like this one: Dec 6 17:26:03 server dbmail/imap4d[4346]: IMAPD [PID 4346]: user (id 1, name test) login accepted @ 2003-12-06 17:26:03^M -- MfG Thomas Mueller - http

[Dbmail-dev] cvs: postgresql problems

2003-12-01 Thread Thomas Mueller
to a inconsistent database (the insert to physmessage succeeded) - this could be easily solved using transactions. I found a thread about using transaction on the dbmail list - are there plans to use transactions for 2.0 ? Thanks! -- MfG Thomas Mueller - http://www.tmueller.com for pgp key (95702B3B)