Bug#368225: please don't!

2006-06-19 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Toni Mueller wrote: Hello, I'd say that making a LAMP package that includes a lot of PHP stuff and not much else is sort of hijacking a good name for a bad purpose. If anything, packages like lamp-python (best language) lamp-perl (original definition of LAMP) lamp-php (in

Bug#368225: please don't!

2006-06-19 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Thom May wrote: I don't see there's any benefit in doing this _at all_, to be honest. It'll just turn into a whine fest when people don't get exactly what they want installed, and it then just becomes an unmaintainable mess. -Thom That's exactly why i don't want it in apache, and somebody can

Bug#350683: FTBFS: wrong dependency on libapr1-dev

2006-02-06 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Roberto Pariset wrote: Package: apr-util Version: 1.2.2-3 Severity: important Justification: fails to build from source Hi, apr-util seems to FTBFS on everything but i386 because dependencies cannot be satisfied: E: Couldn't find package libapr1-dev. Maybe you should replace libapr1-dev with

Bug#289868: NMU?

2006-01-28 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Olaf van der Spek wrote: Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: David N. Welton wrote: Olaf van der Spek wrote: Hi, Do you mind if a NMU is done to fix this issue? No, go ahead - thanks! Perhaps waiting an answer from the maintainer would be better. Aren't you one of the maintainers? Yes

Bug#289868: NMU?

2006-01-28 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
David N. Welton wrote: Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: David N. Welton wrote: Olaf van der Spek wrote: Hi, Do you mind if a NMU is done to fix this issue? No, go ahead - thanks! Perhaps waiting an answer from the maintainer would be better. As Adam already said it is in his tree/queue

Bug#289868: NMU?

2006-01-28 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Olaf van der Spek wrote: There are five maintainers listed in the maintainers field. Are you saying that none of them had time to post a reply that none of them have time to work on most of the bugs for the past/next year? Since i don't dig into the other 4 maintainer private lifes and I can

Bug#289868: NMU?

2006-01-28 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Olaf van der Spek wrote: Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: Olaf van der Spek wrote: There are five maintainers listed in the maintainers field. Are you saying that none of them had time to post a reply that none of them have time to work on most of the bugs for the past/next year? Since i

Bug#289868: NMU?

2006-01-27 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
David N. Welton wrote: Olaf van der Spek wrote: Hi, Do you mind if a NMU is done to fix this issue? No, go ahead - thanks! Perhaps waiting an answer from the maintainer would be better. As Adam already said it is in his tree/queue for the next upload. Thanks Fabio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#304785: Include /etc/apache/conf.d/*.conf

2005-04-15 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 severity 304785 wishlist stop Piotr Roszatycki wrote: Package: apache Version: 1.3.33-4 Severity: important Please convert Include /etc/apache/conf.d to the: Include /etc/apache/conf.d/*.conf The files in this directory are handled

Bug#292122: /etc/apache-ssl/httpd.conf is modified without questions on upgrade

2005-01-25 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bjørn Mork wrote: | Package: apache-ssl | Version: 1.3.33-3 | Severity: important | | When I just upgraded apache-ssl, the postinst script did these modifications | without asking me: This is sounds quite impossible because apache uses debconf via ucf

Bug#292122: /etc/apache-ssl/httpd.conf is modified without questions on upgrade

2005-01-25 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bjørn Mork wrote: | Fabio Massimo Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | |Bjørn Mork wrote: || Package: apache-ssl || Version: 1.3.33-3 || Severity: important || || When I just upgraded apache-ssl, the postinst script did these modifications || without

Bug#292122: /etc/apache-ssl/httpd.conf is modified without questions on upgrade

2005-01-25 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bjørn Mork wrote: | Fabio Massimo Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | |Bjørn Mork wrote: | || Anything else I should check? | |If you can efford to do a test break it would be great if you can rever the changes |to the old config and do: | |dpkg

Bug#292122: /etc/apache-ssl/httpd.conf is modified without questions on upgrade

2005-01-25 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bjørn Mork wrote: | Fabio Massimo Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | |Ah hold on.. one more test please.. i forgot about the md5sum check. | |Put the old config in place and edit (very carefully!) /var/lib/ucf/hashfile |with the proper md5sum

Bug#289493: apache-common: Where is mod_proxy?

2005-01-09 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ben Low wrote: | Package: apache-common | Version: 1.3.33-2 | Severity: normal | | | It seems that mod_proxy is not (no longer) provided? | dpkg -c /mirrors/debian.org/pool/main/a/apache/apache-common_1.3.33-2_i386.deb |grep proxy - -rw-r--r--

Bug#288627: apache-ssl, logrotate.d file errors when reloads if apache is not running

2005-01-04 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 tag 288627 woody severity 288627 minor tag 288625 woody severity 288625 minor stop George Georgalis wrote: | Package: apache-ssl | Version: 1.3.26.1+1.48-0woody3 | | see: 288625 | http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=+288625 | | This will

Bug#286975: apache: FTBFS - x86/testing (31mrule: command not found)

2005-01-02 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jon Dowland wrote: | On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 01:18:06PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: | | |I know for sure that configure explicitly requires bash, did you replace |/bin/bash with another |shell? Can you verify the bash md5sum? | | | ~$ md5sum

Re: libapache-mod-perl : libperl.so does not have a corresponding .info file

2005-01-01 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mathieu Jondet wrote: | Hi, | i've just run a apt-get dist-upgrade on my machine on debian/testing, | everything went well except for the mod_perl upgrade, here are the | information: | | mathieu:/home/mathieu# apt-get dist-upgrade | Reading Package

Bug#286975: apache: FTBFS - x86/testing (31mrule: command not found)

2004-12-23 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jon, Jon Dowland wrote: | Package: apache | Version: 1.3.33-2 | Severity: serious | Justification: no longer builds from source | | Hi, I'm sorry to be filing this as I'm finding it hard to believe that | this could be a problem for anyone but me.

Bug#286975: apache: FTBFS - x86/testing (31mrule: command not found)

2004-12-23 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jon Dowland wrote: |This is my best guess atm.. otherwise would it be possible for you to test |the same |in a fresh sarge/sid chroot? that would really help to isolate the problem |between your installed system and my build-test env. | | | I'd be

Bug#286740: apache: log directory should have same permissions as logfiles (possible information disclosure)

2004-12-22 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jan Minar wrote: | On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 09:57:13AM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: | |tag 286740 - security |thanks | |Jan Minar wrote: || Package: apache || Version: 1.3.33-2 || Severity: minor || Tags: security || || Hi. || || /var/log/apache

Bug#286740: apache: log directory should have same permissions as logfiles (possible information disclosure)

2004-12-22 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 11:44:54AM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: | | |There is no point in such operation. If a user have a local account | |it also has at least a few other thousands options to make a DoS on | apache

Re: Bug#286740: apache: log directory should have same permissions as logfiles (possible information disclosure)

2004-12-22 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Ce jour Wed, 22 Dec 2004, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto a dit: | | |-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- |Hash: SHA1 | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: || On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 11:44:54AM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: || | | | it's

Bug#286604: apache using large amounts of CPU

2004-12-21 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 severity 286604 important reassign 286604 php4 thanks PaulWB wrote: | | | package: apache | version: 1.3.33-2 | severity: critical | | | A module or package has been upgraded recently and is creating large | problems for apache if a module has been

Re: Question about maintaining the unofficial/parallel apache-lingerd package.

2004-11-21 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alexis Sukrieh wrote: | Hello there. | | I'm maintaining an unofficial package, apache-lingerd [1]. | It's a new flavour of the official Debian apache source tree. | | As it won't be included in Debian, and as some users requested me | to maintain the

Bug#280206: apache: Apache wont start, FD_SETSIZE set too low in 1.3.31-7?

2004-11-19 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Peter Bredlöv wrote: | Ok, I understand. | | A little googling shows that many people have tried adding CFLAGS, but in lots of cases they werent being used. I guess they didn't add them in the right spot, or something else over-wrote the change. | |

Bug#280233: Bug#280871: Problems with apache, PHP, MM and UML.

2004-11-17 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 reassign 280871 libmm11 reassign 280233 libmm11 merge 280871 280233 severity 280871 grave severity 280233 grave tag 280233 woody tag 280871 woody stop Hi Mark, the last libmm11 stable update breaks apache badly. I received already other reports

Bug#281387: ucf: too many arguments

2004-11-15 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jakob Goldbach wrote: | Package: apache | Version: 1.3.31-7 | | configure fails for apache when you have to many Include files. | | I have a config file for each virtual host - and include them with | Include /etc/apache/vhosts/*.conf | | | Perhaps you

Bug#279690: apache-ssl: Segmentation fault when accessing any pages

2004-11-12 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote: | Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: | | | Can you please attach the configuration files? What modules are you | using? | | Fabio | | | SSLNoV2 | Can you please try to comment this out? Thanks Fabio - -- Self-Service law

Bug#280206: apache: Apache wont start, FD_SETSIZE set too low in 1.3.31-7?

2004-11-12 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Peter Bredlöv wrote: | I installed apache, apache-common and apache-utils, but the same error comes up; | | [Wed Nov 10 01:55:34 2004] [warn] make_sock: problem listening on port 443, filedescriptor (1128) larger than FD_SETSIZE (1024) found, you

Bug#280206: apache: Apache wont start, FD_SETSIZE set too low in 1.3.31-7?

2004-11-08 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 tag 280206 moreinfo thanks Peter Bredlöv wrote: | Package: apache | Version: 1.3.31-7 | Severity: important | | I recently upgraded from 1.3.31-6 to 1.3.31-7. After this, apache wont start | any more unless I disable the log files I have for my around

Bug#279753: apache: execute arbitrary code via SSI issue (CAN-2004-0940)

2004-11-05 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hideki Yamane wrote: | Hi, | | | Yes, stability is most important thing in stable release. | | I would ask you that it needs to be built on all woody arch means | it needs more time to be checked because changed source should be | able to be built

Re: Bug#279753: apache: execute arbitrary code via SSI issue (CAN-2004-0940)

2004-11-05 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This is offtopic for the bug. Hideki Yamane wrote: | Hi, | | Fri, 05 Nov 2004 09:32:59 +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto | Re: Bug#279753: apache: execute arbitrary code via SSI issue (CAN-2004-0940) | | Is that review process on public or closed

Bug#279865: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#279865: apache-common: CAN-2004-0940 Vulnerable?)

2004-11-05 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Helge Kreutzmann wrote: | Hello, | On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 06:18:12AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: | |Thanks for reporting this twice already. Please before filing bugs you are welcome to check both |debian-apache mailing lists and

Re: Apache 1.3 on woody largefile problems

2004-11-03 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Adam Morley wrote: | Hi, | | I sent this to debian-user, but haven't heard anything. I didn't know if I should submit it as a bug, or send it here first --- sorry if I'm doing it the wrong way. Please point me to the right place otherwise. | |

Bug#277124: apache-common: /var/lib/apache/mod-bandwidth permissions

2004-10-19 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Eric Lammerts wrote: | Thom May wrote: | | Thank you so much, we hadn't noticed we were deliberately creating a | directory with 777 permissions. | (yes, it is necessary, and yes, it is really necessary, and yes it's | absolutely necessary). | | |

Re: help

2004-10-12 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Priya Ranjan wrote: | Hi I am not a member of this list but I need some help. I was trying to | install libapache-mod-perl and uninstall also but it was giving me grief | as shown below. | Any solutions? | thanks, | -priya | | | (Reading database ...

Re: Problem with segfaulting Apache 1.3.31-6 on Debian Sarge

2004-10-06 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Adrian Neumaier wrote: | Hi, | | with the latest apache update i get an segmentation fault in apache | while reading /usr/share/misc/file/magic/mime. | | If i do an 'strace apache -F' i get the following output: | |

Re: Need some help to package apache-lingerd

2004-10-04 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alexis Sukrieh wrote: | Hello there. | | I'm pretty interested in trying to package apache-lingerd, which has | been requested for more than 500 days now : | http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=187460 | | Could someone point me to some

Bug#272463: (no subject)

2004-09-20 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
reassign 272463 libapache-mod-php4 stop -- user fajita: step one fajita Whatever the problem, step one is always to look in the error log. user fajita: step two fajita When in danger or in doubt, step two is to scream and shout.

Re: Bug#272069: apache: fix for #269009 raised a new problem

2004-09-17 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
tag 272069 wontfix severity 272069 wishlist stop On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: Package: apache Version: 1.3.31-6 Severity: important #269009's usage of www-browser instead of lynx raised a new problem: Not all www-browser alternatives do support -dump. This is a browser

Re: Bug#271945: apache in woody is missing security patches/updates

2004-09-16 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Matt Zimmerman wrote: Maintainers, please raise the severity of this bug and contact the security team if this is an urgent issue. Please can we have at least the CAN number and reference? Joey has been keeping track of this iirc. Fabio -- user fajita: step one fajita

Re: Can apache display file size correctly which is bigger than 4G ?

2004-09-15 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, cwinl-debian-apache wrote: hi,all: I put some DVD image files(each more than 4GB) into an apache's directory. but i found that file size is xxxMB when i open that dir in IE browser . why? is it apache's bug? No it's a limitation. You need apache2 for LFS. Fabio --

Re: mod-mono has screwed up my apache

2004-09-14 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Mike McKay wrote: Hi, I am getting the following error whenever I try and do pretty much anything (installing Squirrelmail) via apt now: Error: libmod_mono.so does not have a corresponding .info file. The above errors might cause apache to not work properly or start

Re: Bug#271302: init.d script should not kill other unrelated apache processes

2004-09-12 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: Package: apache Version: 1.3.31-6 While upgrading apache in a chroot, I noticed that: (a) there are two lines trying to stop apache, and not one: Preparing to replace apache 1.3.31-3 (using .../apache_1.3.31-6_i386.deb) ... Stopping web

Re: apache upgrade cleans modules.conf

2004-09-09 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Gabor FUNK wrote: Current testing, upg. to apache 1.3.31-5 rendered php4 not working by installing a clear modules.conf over the one which contained a modules.conf with a line: loadmodule php4_module ... Happened on two systems. G. php4 has been broken for a few days.

Re: Bug#269757: apache-common: missing .info for mod_macro.so error during libapache-mod-php4 setup

2004-09-09 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Sat, 4 Sep 2004, Jonathan Ah Kit wrote: Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: Setting up libapache-mod-php4 (4.3.8-9) ... Error: mod_macro.so does not have a corresponding .info file. apache-common does not ship mod_macro.so or the info file. mod_macro is compiled in. Please check /usr/lib

Re: Bug#270418: apache: Apache initscript ignores system locale

2004-09-08 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Ian Eure wrote: Is there some definitive resource which documents these effects? I'd like to know what I run the risk of breaking by forcing Apache to use my locale. Check the BTS for archived apache bugs. some of them were reporting problems when LANG != C. I am not sure

Re: Bug#270418: apache: Apache initscript ignores system locale

2004-09-07 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
severity 270418 wishlist tag 270418 wontfix stop On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Ian Eure wrote: Package: apache Version: 1.3.31-5 Severity: important Tags: l10n From /etc/init.d/apache: -- snip -- ENV=env -i LANG=C PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin ... APACHECTL=$ENV $APACHECTL -- snip --

Re: Bug#270459: Apache-ssl inetd

2004-09-07 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
severity 270459 minor tag 270459 woody stop On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, LANTek wrote: But if ServerType standalone it's all right how to launch apache-ssl from inetd? apache and inetd are usually a very very bad combination. It is highly unsuggested. Also there are much more recent versions of

Re: Bug#270214: httpd.conf issues with mod_backtrace and mod_whatkilledus

2004-09-06 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Mon, 6 Sep 2004, Marc Haber wrote: Package: apache Severity: minor Hi, the httpd.conf in later apache packages configures mod_backtrace.c and mod_whatkilledus.c. The comment introducing that part of configuration contains an English error: +# They must NOT used in production

Re: Bug#270224: LogFormat directive probably incorrect

2004-09-06 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Mon, 6 Sep 2004, Marc Haber wrote: Package: apache Version: 1.3.29.0.2-5 Severity: minor LogFormat %h %l %u %t \%r\ %s %b \%{forensic-id}n forensic This looks like we're missing a \ between the %{forensic-id}n and the quote. good catch. Thanks for reporting Fabio -- user fajita:

Re: Bug#270219: httpd.conf: docs say LoadModule, line is Include

2004-09-06 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Mon, 6 Sep 2004, Marc Haber wrote: Package: apache Version: 1.3.29.0.2-5 Severity: minor httpd.conf says: # Please keep this LoadModule: line here, it is needed for installation. Include /etc/apache/modules.conf Shouldn't it say Please keep this Include line here? No. This is correct

Re: Bug#242543: More information

2004-09-03 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Carl Johnstone wrote: I've managed to track down why QUERY_STRING works and PATH_INFO doesn't. In src/modules/standard/mod_include.c around line 2181 mod_include fixes up the QUERY_STRING. If I add similar code to fixup PATH_INFO ie: if (r-path_info) {

Re: Bug#269757: apache-common: missing .info for mod_macro.so error during libapache-mod-php4 setup

2004-09-03 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Jonathan Ah Kit wrote: I'm loathe to send in bug reports, but I've been asked to resubmit this as apache-common or post to the debian-apache list (see #269738), and seeing lists.debian.org says 'It is neither for submitting bug reports (please use the BTS for that), nor

Re: Bug#269499: apache-ssl: SSL log directives don't work?

2004-09-02 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
tag 269499 moreinfo stop On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Rafael D'Halleweyn wrote: Package: apache-ssl Version: 1.3.31-5 Severity: important The SSL log directives don't work for me, I only get a '+' in the logs. Looking at the source in src/modules/standard/mod_log_config.c, I see that the

Re: Bulgarian translation

2004-09-01 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Ivan Dimitrov wrote: Hello I've translated apache-1.3.31-1 debian/po/ file to Bulgarian, it is called bg.po, please reply to me where should I send the file, as I'm not subscribed to this list. Please send it to me or to the list. Thanks for your translation effort!

Re: Bug#269377: apache: Upgrade broke Apache and PHP

2004-09-01 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
tag 269377 moreinfo severity 269377 normal stop On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Brian C wrote: Package: apache Version: 1.3.31-4 Severity: important I just upgraded Apache (among other things.) Now my site, which runs b2evolution (serving up a .php index file), does not display and constantly

Bug#269377: apache: Upgrade broke Apache and PHP

2004-09-01 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Please keep the bug number in CC. On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You need to enable the php4 module manually with something like: LoadModule php4_module /usr/lib/apache/1.3/libphp4.so otherwise php4 isn't used at all. Such a line is in my modules.conf after using dselect

Bug#269377: apache: Upgrade broke Apache and PHP

2004-09-01 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok. I'll try to attach the index.php. Which config files would help? All of them. I need to reproduce your environment here. Also, the same problem occurs no matter which .php file I try to view on the site. regular .html files work no problem.

Re: Bug#262582: apache-common: apache-modconf doesn't accept correct syntax. dpkg reported error status 128 when installing libapache-mod-perl

2004-08-01 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
retitle 262582 BASH3.0 BREAKS APACHE! THANKS BASH MAINTAINER. stop On Sun, 1 Aug 2004, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: Hi Philipp, On Sat, 31 Jul 2004, Philipp Bliedung wrote: Package: apache-common Version: 1.3.31-2 Severity: serious Justification: apache-modconf doesn't accept

Re: modules-config apache enable mod_ssl Exits w/ 128

2004-08-01 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry to bother, but I'm having trouble with modules-config. Recently, I couldn't update libapache-mod-ssl. I tracked the problem down to it's postinst script, which calls modules-config apache enable mod_ssl. When I try running modules-config

Re: Bug#262582: apache-common: apache-modconf doesn't accept correct syntax. dpkg reported error status 128 when installing libapache-mod-perl

2004-08-01 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Hi Philipp, On Sat, 31 Jul 2004, Philipp Bliedung wrote: Package: apache-common Version: 1.3.31-2 Severity: serious Justification: apache-modconf doesn't accept correct syntax *** Please type your report below this line *** apache-common: apache-modconf doesn't accept correct syntax.

Re: Processed: Re: Bug#259211: apache segfault after upgrade from woody

2004-07-14 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote: Djoum this is a very old and known problem, the only known workaround to it is to enable libapache-mod-ssl, even if unconfigured. We are all waiting for the libc6 maintainer to fix this issue. Jeff please it's time to fix this issue. This bug

Re: Bug#259211: apache segfault after upgrade from woody

2004-07-13 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, SALVETTI Djoume wrote: Package: apache Version: 1.3.29.0.2-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Good day, After upgrading from woody to sarge, apache doesn't start anymore. In /var/log/apache/error.log I can see : [Tue Jul 13 14:38:01 2004]

Re: Bug#259211: apache segfault after upgrade from woody

2004-07-13 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
reassign 259211 libc6 stop On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Djoumé SALVETTI wrote: Le mardi 07/13/04 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : and apache -X give me a segfault (see attached strace). Can you try to disable php4? Indeed, if I comment : # LoadModule php4_module /usr/lib

Re: Bug#258951: Cannot install apache-ssl

2004-07-12 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Michael Still wrote: Package: apache-ssl Version: 1.3.31-2 Severity: normal After asking configuration information, the package fails to configure, and therefore doesn't start... If perhaps you can show us the error and the config files in /etc/apache-ssl that would

Re: Bug#258602: apache: /usr/local/bin not included in PATH environment

2004-07-11 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
tag 258602 pending stop Hi Fredrik On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Fredrik Åslund wrote: /usr/local/bin or /usr/local/sbin is not included in the default PATH environment for apache. Aren't those common enough to be considered default? Any CGI-script that uses programs not shipped with Debian requires

Re: apache suexec, non-standard docroot

2004-07-08 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, R.M. Evers wrote: dear list, today i wanted to enable apache's suexec mechanism on one of our debian woody webservers, so that our customers can use cgi more securely. but in my infinite wisdom, i created all user accounts under /home/domains, instead of /var/www.. this

Re: apache suexec, non-standard docroot

2004-07-08 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, R.M. Evers wrote: thanks for your speedy reply. so it's possible to only recompile suexec? or do you mean i have to recompile apache with proper patching? suexec is compiled together with apache. It is possible to compile suexec on its own but it is much more complicate

Re: Bug#258113: apache upgrade bug

2004-07-07 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Rafi Rubin wrote: Package: apache Version: 1.3.31-2 While upgrading: Setting up apache (1.3.31-2) ... Starting web server: apache failed invoke-rc.d: initscript apache, action start failed. dpkg: error processing apache (--configure): I needed to stop apache before

Re: Bug#257775: AddDefaultCharset default setting is misleading

2004-07-06 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Hi Marc, On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, [utf-8] Marc Dequènes wrote: Package: apache Severity: minor Coin, Default setting is on by default, so apache force a specific encoding. Most users, and some not complete newbie, are unable to understand why their site is not working as expected, and some

Re: Bug#257775: AddDefaultCharset default setting is misleading

2004-07-06 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, [utf-8] Marc Dequènes wrote: Coin, Since setting AddDefaultCharset off can imply security problem we will never switch it to off. For more information please check the previous URL and the apache documentation on httpd.apache.org I'm OK with all this. May i suggest

Re: Bug#257775: AddDefaultCharset default setting is misleading

2004-07-06 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Matthew Wilcox wrote: On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 07:10:10AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: This thing has been discussed over and over. This is the last reference to it: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=211889archive=yes Since setting

Re: Bug#257775: AddDefaultCharset default setting is misleading

2004-07-06 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, [utf-8] Marc Dequènes wrote: Coin, Since setting AddDefaultCharset off can imply security problem we will never switch it to off. For more information please check the previous URL and the apache documentation

Bug#257566: [INTL:tr] Turkish po-debconf translation

2004-07-06 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
tag 257566 pending stop On Sun, 4 Jul 2004, Recai Oktas wrote: Package: apache Severity: wishlist Tags: patch l10n Hi, Please find attached the Turkish po-debconf translation. Thanks Deniz Bahadir Gur. Regards, Hi, thanks for the translation! It is included in our CVS now and

Re: Bug#256982: Upgrade of Apache fails due to configuration syntax error.

2004-07-06 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, David Grant wrote: Can you kindly post the relevant bits of the configuration? otherwise tar them all up and send them to me. Just rebooted to take advantage of kernel 2.6.6 and the problem is resolved. It would seem pointless to send the conf. now, but I can if you

Re: Bug#257108: apache: /var/lib/apache/mod-bandwidth/ is world writable

2004-07-01 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
This has been discussed before several time. Here is one: http://lists.debian.org/debian-apache/2004/02/msg00045.html On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: Package: apache-common Version: 1.3.31-1 Priority: important Tags: security I cannot really understand why this

Re: Bug#256713: Apache security update made my website disappear

2004-06-28 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, Ian Jackson wrote: Package: apache Version: 1.3.26-0woody5 The security update to apache changed my httpd.conf and srm.conf in a way that meant my system's website disappeared. I did get offered `Save these changes to the configuration files? [Y/n]' and said yes, but:

Re: mod_proxy Apache potential issue

2004-06-24 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Matt Zimmerman wrote: On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 03:24:13PM +0200, Marc SCHAEFER wrote: it seems there is a potential buffer overflow in Apache's mod_proxy. Are you aware of it ? What I believe I heard from our Apache maintainers was that this would only crash the

Re: Bug#255930: apache-modconf fails to disable modules

2004-06-24 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
tag 255930 moreinfo tag 255930 unreproducible stop Hi, On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, C.Y.M. wrote: Package: apache-common Version: 1.3.31-1 Change Request: apache-modconf fails to disable modules in apache and apache-ssl For Example: When I type apache-modconf apache-ssl disable

RE: Bug#255930: apache-modconf fails to disable modules

2004-06-24 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, C.Y.M. wrote: I have followed your instructions and first listed the contents of modules.conf in apache-ssl. Then I added mod_imap. Next, I listed the new contents of modules.conf (and mod_imap was there). Finally, I was able to remove mod_imap and it was no longer in

Bug#252678: downgrading severity

2004-06-11 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Please keep [EMAIL PROTECTED] in CC. On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Marcelo Toledo wrote: I am going to do this today. But you have to answer me something please. As I said in the last email I have a working version of apache going on. And after apt-get remove apache --purge and apt-get install

Re: Bug#253203: apache will not start due to syntax error

2004-06-10 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 10:16:34AM -0400, William R. McDonough wrote: I have removed the following lines from my httpd.conf I have no idea why they were in there... but everything works fine without them. Do you have mod_perl installed

Re: Bug#253413: /etc/apache-perl not purged

2004-06-09 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Alejandro Exojo wrote: Package: apache-perl Version: 1.3.31-1 Severity: normal When purging apache-perl, dpkg complained about /etc/apache-perl, because it isn't empty. The same applies to apache-ssl: --8 Removing

Re: Re: Bug#247140: apache: Please fix this soon

2004-06-09 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Martinelli Thomas wrote: hi, is this fixed now or not ? Yes. at least with the newest installation for debian unstable (done yesterday), the problem still exists. Impossible that is the same problem. Which problem are you having? logs? errors? Fabio -- user fajita:

Re: Bug#253203: apache will not start due to syntax error

2004-06-08 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, William R. McDonough wrote: Package: apache Version: 1.3.31-1 Sometime in the last 24 hours, probably after an upgrade... not sure... Apache died and will not restart. The error given is not enough information for me to find which file apache is complaining about:

Re: Bug#253203: apache will not start due to syntax error

2004-06-08 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: try to start apache again and keep an eye on /var/log/error.log. oops /var/log/apache/error.log Fabio -- user fajita: step one fajita Whatever the problem, step one is always to look in the error log. user fajita: step two fajita When

Re: Bug#252067: more info?

2004-06-08 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Matthew Palmer wrote: Whoops, sorry about that. I thought it did. no problem. i wasn't upset.. just a note ;) My best guess is that, since installing php4-sqlite that depends on php4api that is provided by 2 packages that pulls in apache and apache2, There are only

Re: Bug#253306: apache-dev apt-get dependency problem

2004-06-08 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, John Bradshaw wrote: Package: apache-dev Version: 1.3.26-0wo Dependencies cannot be satisfied when installing apache-dev, see below... You have messed up your system, backporting packages that are not supposed to be in woody. ii apache 1.3.29.0.2-4 Versatile,

Re: Bug#253054: apache-ssl doesn't follow the TLS protocol

2004-06-07 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Sun, 6 Jun 2004, Pedro Corte-Real wrote: Package: apache-ssl Severity: important Version: 1.3.31-1 I'm having problems connecting to an apache-ssl server using gnutls. The gnutls developers tell me this is because apache isn't following the TLS protocol. apache-ssl does not support TLS

Bug#252678: apache: apache: can't install in sid

2004-06-07 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Marcelo Toledo wrote: I have a working apache version in this machine so I need to have a webserver running, thats why I will have to try it in another machine that I get the same error, so I will take a little bit more time then usual... but hang on... or, do you have

Re: Bug#252678: apache: apache: can't install in sid

2004-06-06 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Marcelo Toledo wrote: It would be enough to know why it fails. I asked the other guy to check /var/log/apache/error.log and got no reply. Can you do that? The script does not reach apache, so there is no log, the bug is probably here: kali:/var/log/apache# .

Re: Bug#252678: apache: apache: can't install in sid

2004-06-04 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
tags 252678 moreinfo tags 252678 unreproducible merge 252678 251175 stop Hi Marcelo, On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Marcelo Toledo wrote: Package: apache Version: 1.3.31-1 Severity: serious As Jerome reported I am also having the same problem: see:

Re: missing LoadModule php4

2004-06-01 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Maurizio Marini wrote: Hi i've just installed apache 1.3.31-1 and php4; i note that in modules.conf is missing lsomething like: LoadModule php4_module /usr/lib/apache/1.3/libphp4.so should i add it by hand? No. apache-modconf apache and you will get prompted for the

Bug#156972: Tagging

2004-06-01 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
severity 156972 wishlist tag 156972 wontfix stop This bug is now fixed in apache2 upstream cvs right now. Upstream will not backport this feature to apache1.3. The only way to get 4GB support is to upgrade to apache2. Fabio -- user fajita: step one fajita Whatever the problem, step one is

Re: Bug#247011: Broken dependency - apache requires perl 5.8.4-0 which is unavailable

2004-05-03 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Sun, 2 May 2004, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: Package: apache Version: 1.3.29.0.2-5 Severity: serious Easy with severities please. Tags: sid The apache package has dependency on perl 5.8.4-0 but perl 5.8.4-1 hit unstable today. The reason why we are now enforcing strict dependency

Re: Bug#247103: apache-dev: cannot be installed

2004-05-03 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Hi, this is fixed already in -6. You will have to wait tomorrow that it will hit the mirrors. Fabio On Mon, 3 May 2004, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: Package: apache-dev Version: most recent Severity: normal Tags: sid # apt-get install apache-dev Reading Package Lists... Done

Re: Bug#247140: apache: Uninstallable in sid

2004-05-03 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Please check the BTS before reporting bugs. Fabio On Mon, 3 May 2004, Martin Pitt wrote: Package: apache Version: 1.3.29.0.2-5 Severity: grave Tags: sid Justification: renders package unusable Hi Debian apache team! After today's dist-upgrade (via dselect), I got a surprising boot

Re: Bug#247154: apache-common: The following packages have unmet dependencies

2004-05-03 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
This is already fixed in -6 that it is in incoming. Please check the BTS before filing bugs against apache. On Mon, 3 May 2004, Koning, Jeroen wrote: Package: apache-common Version: 1.3.29.0.2-5 Severity: grave Tags: experimental Justification: renders package unusable The error message

Re: Bug#247140: apache: Please fix this soon

2004-05-03 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
It is already fixed in incoming. On Mon, 3 May 2004, Fionn Behrens wrote: Package: apache Version: 1.3.29.0.1-5 Followup-For: Bug #247140 I basically ran into the same problem: trying to install the latest apache, my perl appeared to be too old but installing a new one would mean its too

  1   2   3   >