On 16/11/23 15:40, Tixy wrote:
On Thu, 2023-11-16 at 09:04 +0800, jeremy ardley wrote:
My current favourites are RK3588 based CPU SBC devices which have an
exceptionally fast set of CPUs, high speed networking, and options for
Debian or Ubuntu or OpenWRT or Armbian.
Are these the usual SBC
On Thu, 2023-11-16 at 09:04 +0800, jeremy ardley wrote:
> My current favourites are RK3588 based CPU SBC devices which have an
> exceptionally fast set of CPUs, high speed networking, and options for
> Debian or Ubuntu or OpenWRT or Armbian.
Are these the usual SBC setup where you have to run
El 2023-11-15 a las 22:49 +, José Manuel (Abogado) escribió:
> El 14/11/23 a las 11:42, Camaleón escribió:
> > El 2023-11-13 a las 17:50 +, José Manuel (Abogado) escribió:
> >
> > > Disculpen si el problema no es de Debian, por si acaso he puesto OT. Mi
> > > Debian es el 12 (Bookworm)
>
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 07:14:04AM +0100, Kamil Jo?ca wrote:
Kamil Jo?ca writes:
Charles Curley writes:
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 04:11:37 +
"Russell L. Harris" wrote:
root@mollydew:/home/rlh# systemctl daemon-reload
root@mollydew:/home/rlh# systemctl restart approx
Failed to restart
Kamil Jońca writes:
> Charles Curley writes:
>
>> On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 04:11:37 +
>> "Russell L. Harris" wrote:
>>
>>> root@mollydew:/home/rlh# systemctl daemon-reload
>>> root@mollydew:/home/rlh# systemctl restart approx
>>> Failed to restart approx.service: Unit approx.service not found.
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 07:48:44AM +0200, Anssi Saari wrote:
"Russell L. Harris" writes:
root@mollydew:/home/rlh# systemctl daemon-reload
root@mollydew:/home/rlh# systemctl restart approx
Failed to restart approx.service: Unit approx.service not found.
root@mollydew:/home/rlh# systemctl
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 10:55:51PM -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
Do you really need approx if you have only the one machine?
I install Debian for friends. They are amazed at how fast their old
Windows machines run with Debian. And approx has been a time saver
for me.
In the network mirror
Charles Curley writes:
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 04:11:37 +
> "Russell L. Harris" wrote:
>
>> root@mollydew:/home/rlh# systemctl daemon-reload
>> root@mollydew:/home/rlh# systemctl restart approx
>> Failed to restart approx.service: Unit approx.service not found.
>> root@mollydew:/home/rlh#
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 05:42:57 +
"Russell L. Harris" wrote:
> Thanks for checking, Charles. My schedule does not allow me to work
> on it until tomorrow evening. However, can auto-apt-proxy be
> specified during mirror selection with a netinstall?
That I do not know. But the default port
"Russell L. Harris" writes:
> root@mollydew:/home/rlh# systemctl daemon-reload
> root@mollydew:/home/rlh# systemctl restart approx
> Failed to restart approx.service: Unit approx.service not found.
> root@mollydew:/home/rlh# systemctl status approx
> Unit approx.service could not be found.
>
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 10:23:45PM -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 22:18:09 -0700
Charles Curley wrote:
One thing I didn't like is that approx appears to require fiddling
with sources.list. apt-cacher-ng simply requires setting a proxy
value, in its own file in
On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 22:18:09 -0700
Charles Curley wrote:
> One thing I didn't like is that approx appears to require fiddling
> with sources.list. apt-cacher-ng simply requires setting a proxy
> value, in its own file in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d. E.g.:
>
> root@hawk:/etc/apt/apt.conf.d# cat
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 04:11:37 +
"Russell L. Harris" wrote:
> root@mollydew:/home/rlh# systemctl daemon-reload
> root@mollydew:/home/rlh# systemctl restart approx
> Failed to restart approx.service: Unit approx.service not found.
> root@mollydew:/home/rlh# systemctl status approx
> Unit
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 21:58:17 -0500
wrote:
>As it happens, pass(1) appeared to be precisely what I was looking for.
>My original code stores all passwords in a single file, whereas pass
>stores each password in a separate file. In addition, I don't need pass
>in order to decode the password
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 07:41:03PM -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 01:39:32 +
"Russell L. Harris" wrote:
I installed approx in a Debian 12 system, but when I attempt to
restart it the error message appears "Unit approx.service not loaded."
Please show us a complete copy
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 01:39:32 +
"Russell L. Harris" wrote:
> I installed approx in a Debian 12 system, but when I attempt to
> restart it the error message appears "Unit approx.service not loaded."
Please show us a complete copy and paste of the transaction, from the
initial prompt and the
On 16/11/23 10:15, Charles Curley wrote:
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 09:04:55 +0800
jeremy ardley wrote:
My current favourites are RK3588 based CPU SBC devices which have an
exceptionally fast set of CPUs, high speed networking, and options
for Debian or Ubuntu or OpenWRT or Armbian. They can
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 09:04:55 +0800
jeremy ardley wrote:
> My current favourites are RK3588 based CPU SBC devices which have an
> exceptionally fast set of CPUs, high speed networking, and options
> for Debian or Ubuntu or OpenWRT or Armbian. They can provide a
> network storage service as well
I installed approx in a Debian 12 system, but when I attempt to
restart it the error message appears "Unit approx.service not loaded."
The approx man page (dated May 2011) says that approx is invoked by
inetd, but I think that in Debian 12 approx is invoked by systemctl or
systemd.
synaptic
On 14/11/23 08:42, Dan Ritter wrote:
I bought one of these:
https://www.amazon.com/Firewall-Appliance-HUNSN-Barebone-Storage/dp/B0B53MKZBX/
(4 x 2.5Gb NICs, N5105 CPU) -- I paid about $250 including 16GB RAM
and a 500GB SSD. Works very nicely. For about $70 less you can get
them with 2x
I've been using K9 for a while.
It does threading by dropping the thread into a new 'tree' similar to tbird's
indenting of an open thread in its main tree, but in a side window where I
scroll the thread and press back arrow when I want to close the thread.
FairEmail does threading the same
On 11/15/23 18:37, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
On 16.11.2023 03:46, Charles Curley wrote:
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 01:58:05 +0500
"Alexander V. Makartsev" wrote:
16 years is a good amount of value. :)
Is it Pentium 4 on ITX motherboard?
Nope. FIT-PC, first iteration. Processor is an AMD Geode
On 16.11.2023 03:46, Charles Curley wrote:
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 01:58:05 +0500
"Alexander V. Makartsev" wrote:
16 years is a good amount of value. :)
Is it Pentium 4 on ITX motherboard?
Nope. FIT-PC, first iteration. Processor is an AMD Geode SBC.
https://linux-hardware.org/?probe=c256a73072
El 14/11/23 a las 11:42, Camaleón escribió:
El 2023-11-13 a las 17:50 +, José Manuel (Abogado) escribió:
Disculpen si el problema no es de Debian, por si acaso he puesto OT. Mi
Debian es el 12 (Bookworm)
Desde hace poco tiempo estando trabajando en el ordenador, si por cualquier
motivo
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 01:58:05 +0500
"Alexander V. Makartsev" wrote:
> 16 years is a good amount of value. :)
> Is it Pentium 4 on ITX motherboard?
Nope. FIT-PC, first iteration. Processor is an AMD Geode SBC.
https://linux-hardware.org/?probe=c256a73072
I did buy a spare hard drive for each,
El 13/11/23 a las 21:38, JavierDebian escribió:
El 13/11/23 a las 14:50, José Manuel (Abogado) escribió:
Hola
Disculpen si el problema no es de Debian, por si acaso he puesto OT.
Mi Debian es el 12 (Bookworm)
Desde hace poco tiempo estando trabajando en el ordenador, si por
cualquier
On 15.11.2023 18:47, Charles Curley wrote:
On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 12:31:52 +0500
"Alexander V. Makartsev" wrote:
On 15.11.2023 07:56, Stefan Monnier wrote:
[...]
[...]
I wrote that email as a word of caution, because Roberto had
mentioned he is looking for the device with the same conditions
On Wed 15 Nov 2023 at 20:01:20 (+0100), Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2023-11-15 18:06:45 +, Tixy wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-11-15 at 18:15 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > On 2023-11-15 16:39:15 -, Curt wrote:
> > > > On 2023-11-14, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The base
On 2023-11-15 18:06:45 +, Tixy wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-11-15 at 18:15 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > On 2023-11-15 16:39:15 -, Curt wrote:
> > > On 2023-11-14, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The base number is the same, but I would have thought that this other
> > > > kernel
On Wed, 2023-11-15 at 18:15 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2023-11-15 16:39:15 -, Curt wrote:
> > On 2023-11-14, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > >
> > > The base number is the same, but I would have thought that this other
> > > kernel might have additional patches.
> > >
> > > > That's why
On 15/11/2023 15:40, Michel Verdier wrote:
On 2023-11-15, Max Nikulin wrote:
For Chromium it is better to have a password manager
(gnome-keyring/kwallet/keepassxc/etc.) with D-Bus interface. It needs
a key to encrypt passwords saved in browser and likely cookie store.
Encryption is not applied
On 2023-11-15 16:39:15 -, Curt wrote:
> On 2023-11-14, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> >
> > The base number is the same, but I would have thought that this other
> > kernel might have additional patches.
> >
> >> That's why I suggested ignoring the message.
> >
> > Then why does reportbug mention
On 2023-11-15 08:50:50 +0100, didier gaumet wrote:
> I don't know why particularly a Bullseye-backports kernel is promoted here
> in a mixed stable/unstable context but perhaps (I have not tested it) you
> could set check-available to 0 in /etc/reportbug.conf (1) to avoid to be
> proposed a newer
On 2023-11-15 10:15:35 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 15/11/2023 05:01, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 10:21:13PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > > # $ wget -qO-
> > > >
On 2023-11-14, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
> The base number is the same, but I would have thought that this other
> kernel might have additional patches.
>
>> That's why I suggested ignoring the message.
>
> Then why does reportbug mention the bullseye-backports kernel?
>
Because it kind of looks
On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 12:31:52 +0500
"Alexander V. Makartsev" wrote:
> On 15.11.2023 07:56, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> [...]
> [...]
> I wrote that email as a word of caution, because Roberto had
> mentioned he is looking for the device with the same conditions as
> OP, which is "no fans".
>
Hi,
I installed debian on an SSD, but the motherboard has a softraid
controller, which I used to create a couple of RAID5 volumes - for when I
use(d) windows.
In linux, I have dmraid installed and it correctly detects the disks. I can
also (c)fdisk the disks to see the partitions. It, however,
On 2023-11-15, Max Nikulin wrote:
>>> For Chromium it is better to have a password manager
>>> (gnome-keyring/kwallet/keepassxc/etc.) with D-Bus interface. It needs
>>> a key to encrypt passwords saved in browser and likely cookie store.
>>> Encryption is not applied otherwise.
>> What about
38 matches
Mail list logo