Re: domain status in registry and registrar

2024-08-19 Thread Andy Smith
Hi, On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 07:01:53AM +0800, Wesley wrote: > The dig from com's nameservers got nxdomain as well. As you see here, You appear to have not read my email in full as everything you point out in your reply was already stated in my reply to you. Even the TL;DR: I put at the top, feari

Re: domain status in registry and registrar

2024-08-19 Thread Wesley
he DNS zone. Andy The dig from com's nameservers got nxdomain as well. As you see here, $ dig datafarm.net @a.gtld-servers.net ; <<>> DiG 9.18.18-0ubuntu0.22.04.1-Ubuntu <<>> datafarm.net @a.gtld-servers.net ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER

Re: domain status in registry and registrar

2024-08-19 Thread Andy Smith
Hi, On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 12:46:43PM -0400, Michael Grant wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 04:35:34PM +, Andy Smith wrote: > > TL;DR: I too find it a little odd that whois says this domain is reserved > > but > > querying the DNS shows that it isn't there at all as I would > > usually expec

Re: domain status in registry and registrar

2024-08-19 Thread Michael Grant
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 04:35:34PM +, Andy Smith wrote: > TL;DR: I too find it a little odd that whois says this domain is reserved but > querying the DNS shows that it isn't there at all as I would > usually expect just the NS records to be present in the containing > zone. I can only assume t

Re: domain status in registry and registrar

2024-08-19 Thread Andy Smith
se by directing the query with '@': $ dig +norecurse -t ns datafarm.net @h.gtld-servers.net. ; <<>> DiG 9.16.50-Debian <<>> -t ns datafarm.net @h.gtld-servers.net. ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN,

Re: domain status in registry and registrar

2024-08-19 Thread Michael Kjörling
On 19 Aug 2024 09:45 -0400, from d...@randomstring.org (Dan Ritter): >> As a person who has a few web sites, the first step, is registering the >> domain name, then, the second step, is obtaining web hosting. Upon the >> obtaining of the web hosting, DNS addresses (the IP numbers for the DNS >> ser

Re: domain status in registry and registrar

2024-08-19 Thread Dan Ritter
Bret Busby wrote: > On 19/8/24 21:00, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > > Even less than that: just a DNS record, i.e. some entry in the global > > name database mapping the name to... anything (an IP address, another > > name, a mail exchange, whatever). > > > > You can reserve the name and postpon

Re: domain status in registry and registrar

2024-08-19 Thread Bret Busby
On 19/8/24 21:00, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 08:51:15PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote: On 19/8/24 16:11, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 03:49:11PM +0800, Wesley wrote: First of all, I apologize for my lack of knowledge about the domain name registration industry

Re: domain status in registry and registrar

2024-08-19 Thread tomas
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 08:51:15PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote: > On 19/8/24 16:11, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 03:49:11PM +0800, Wesley wrote: > > > First of all, I apologize for my lack of knowledge about the domain name > > > registration industry. > > > > No need. We all st

Re: domain status in registry and registrar

2024-08-19 Thread Bret Busby
On 19/8/24 16:11, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 03:49:11PM +0800, Wesley wrote: First of all, I apologize for my lack of knowledge about the domain name registration industry. No need. We all stumble in the dark :-) I checked a domain name, datafarm.net, and its DNS showed

Re: domain status in registry and registrar

2024-08-19 Thread Dan Purgert
On Aug 19, 2024, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 03:49:11PM +0800, Wesley wrote: > > First of all, I apologize for my lack of knowledge about the domain name > > registration industry. > > No need. We all stumble in the dark :-) > > > I checked a domain name, datafarm.net, and i

Re: domain status in registry and registrar

2024-08-19 Thread tomas
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 03:49:11PM +0800, Wesley wrote: > First of all, I apologize for my lack of knowledge about the domain name > registration industry. No need. We all stumble in the dark :-) > I checked a domain name, datafarm.net, and its DNS > showed that there was no record (nxdomain) at

domain status in registry and registrar

2024-08-19 Thread Wesley
the registrar. Why is this? This is the dns info from registry nameserver: ; <<>> DiG 9.10.6 <<>> datafarm.net ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 7447 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0,

Re: DNSSEC status of deb.debian.org

2024-03-03 Thread Andre Rodier
eVeFwQ9uvJW1lZa oASmDhoyNijntU9UjA6h/Bzx6ZJvLHlE ; unsigned answer debian.map.fastlydns.net. 30IN A 146.75.74.132 After checking the status using Verisign (https://dnssec-debugger.verisignlabs.com/deb.debian.org), I understand Debian is using a CDN (Content Delivery Network). Is there a stabl

Re: DNSSEC status of deb.debian.org

2024-03-03 Thread Andre Rodier
On 03/03/2024 14:03, Max Nikulin wrote: On 03/03/2024 16:39, Andre Rodier wrote: Is there a stable domain we can use that doesn't rely on a CDN, please ? https://www.debian.org/mirror/list APT relies on GPG signed metadata, so DNSSEC is not necessary for repositories. Thanks, this make

Re: DNSSEC status of deb.debian.org

2024-03-03 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 02:06:00PM +, Andy Smith wrote: > On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 09:39:42AM +, Andre Rodier wrote: > > I was checking the Debian domain, and noticed that it is DNSSEC compliant. > > > > However, when I check "deb.debian.org", the DNS validation fails. > > Things in the de

Re: DNSSEC status of deb.debian.org

2024-03-03 Thread Andy Smith
/Bzx6ZJvLHlE ; unsigned answer debian.map.fastlydns.net. 30IN A 146.75.74.132 > After checking the status using Verisign > (https://dnssec-debugger.verisignlabs.com/deb.debian.org), I understand > Debian is using a CDN (Content Delivery Network). > > Is there a stable d

Re: DNSSEC status of deb.debian.org

2024-03-03 Thread Max Nikulin
On 03/03/2024 16:39, Andre Rodier wrote: Is there a stable domain we can use that doesn't rely on a CDN, please ? https://www.debian.org/mirror/list APT relies on GPG signed metadata, so DNSSEC is not necessary for repositories.

DNSSEC status of deb.debian.org

2024-03-03 Thread Andre Rodier
Hello, I was checking the Debian domain, and noticed that it is DNSSEC compliant. However, when I check "deb.debian.org", the DNS validation fails. After checking the status using Verisign (https://dnssec-debugger.verisignlabs.com/deb.debian.org), I understand Debian is using a CD

Status of ISC Stork (monitoring daemon to ISC Kea) in Debian

2024-01-06 Thread Ralph Aichinger
Hi everybody! Normally I am quite good at finding out if and why not something is packaged in Debian, but I have not found any information about ISC Stork, basically an optional accessory to ISC Kea. While migrating to Kea from ISC dhcpd, I noticed that this component is not packaged Or have I o

Re: systemctl status mariadb - Access denied for user root at localhost using password NO

2023-10-02 Thread Andy Smith
Hello, On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 04:45:25PM +0300, Petros Pap wrote: > root@server:~# mysql -u root > ERROR 1045 (28000): Access denied for user 'root'@'localhost' (using > password: NO) I believe that the Debian packaging of MariaDB is by default set up to allow socket authentication for root@loca

systemctl status mariadb - Access denied for user root at localhost using password NO

2023-10-02 Thread Petros Pap
> But when i try root@server:~# systemctl stop mariadb.service root@server:~# systemctl restart mariadb.service root@server:~# systemctl status mariadb.service ● mariadb.service - MariaDB 10.11.3 database server Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/mariadb.service; enabled; preset: enabled) A

Re: Any way to make apt ignore dpkg status file?

2022-07-09 Thread Tim Woodall
On Sat, 9 Jul 2022, Tim Woodall wrote: Hi $ APT_CONFIG=../apt/apt.conf.buster.amd64 apt-cache policy dpkg dpkg: Installed: 1.20.10 Candidate: 1.20.10 Version table: *** 1.20.10 100 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1.19.8 500 500 http://aptmirror17.home.woodall.me.uk/local buster

Re: Any way to make apt ignore dpkg status file?

2022-07-09 Thread Dan Ritter
Tim Woodall wrote: > Hi > > $ APT_CONFIG=../apt/apt.conf.buster.amd64 apt-cache policy dpkg > dpkg: > Installed: 1.20.10 > Candidate: 1.20.10 > Version table: > *** 1.20.10 100 > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > 1.19.8 500 > 500 http://apt

Any way to make apt ignore dpkg status file?

2022-07-08 Thread Tim Woodall
Hi $ APT_CONFIG=../apt/apt.conf.buster.amd64 apt-cache policy dpkg dpkg: Installed: 1.20.10 Candidate: 1.20.10 Version table: *** 1.20.10 100 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1.19.8 500 500 http://aptmirror17.home.woodall.me.uk/local buster/essential amd64 Packages Is there

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

2022-06-22 Thread Siard
On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 17:25 +1000, Keith Bainbridge wrote: > On 21/6/22 20:53, Siard wrote: > > I should also note that right now there appear to be problems with the > > latest > > kernel, 5.18.0. The message in the terminal where VB was started from, says: > > "WARNING: The vboxdrv kernel module i

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

2022-06-22 Thread Siard
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 13:28 -0400, Boyan Penkov wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022, 13:26 Siard wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 07:48 -0400, Boyan Penkov wrote: > > > ... ensuring linux-kernel-headers for 5.18 were installed, and then > > > reinstalling virtualbox and virtualbox-dkms resolved the issue fo

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

2022-06-22 Thread didier gaumet
Le lundi 20 juin 2022 à 14:21 +0200, Anders Andersson a écrit : > I remember when Virtualbox was removed from debian, and I remember > the > reasons. That's why I was surprised when I saw a recent message to > the > list where a user tried to install it. Searching for "virtualbox" > indeed shows

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

2022-06-22 Thread Keith Bainbridge
On 21/6/22 20:53, Siard wrote: On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:05 +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: On 20/06/2022 14:55, Siard wrote: On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:21 +0200, Anders Andersson wrote: Has something changed that makes virtualbox workable again, I have the Virtualbox 6.1.34 package for Debian

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

2022-06-21 Thread Boyan Penkov
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 7:32 PM Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: > > On 21/06/2022 12:48, Boyan Penkov wrote: > > > > > > On 6/21/22 07:35, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: > >> On 21/06/2022 11:53, Siard wrote: > >>> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:05 +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: > On 20/06/2022 14:55, Siar

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

2022-06-21 Thread Peter Hillier-Brook
On 21/06/2022 12:48, Boyan Penkov wrote: On 6/21/22 07:35, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: On 21/06/2022 11:53, Siard wrote: On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:05 +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: On 20/06/2022 14:55, Siard wrote: On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:21 +0200, Anders Andersson wrote: : www.virtualbox.or

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

2022-06-21 Thread Oliver Schoede
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 13:31:11 +0100 Joe wrote: > >Yes, I was using it a few years ago, and a new Debian kernel made the >guest additions unusable. I forget what I needed them for, but gave up >on VB then. I dare say a later version of the VB additions fixed the >problem, but there was no knowing h

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

2022-06-21 Thread Boyan Penkov
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022, 13:26 Siard wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 07:48 -0400, Boyan Penkov wrote: > > ... ensuring linux-kernel-headers for 5.18 were installed, and then > > reinstalling virtualbox and virtualbox-dkms resolved the issue for me. > > I can confirm this is working on 5.18.0-1-amd64 ri

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

2022-06-21 Thread Siard
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 07:48 -0400, Boyan Penkov wrote: > ... ensuring linux-kernel-headers for 5.18 were installed, and then > reinstalling virtualbox and virtualbox-dkms resolved the issue for me. > I can confirm this is working on 5.18.0-1-amd64 right now. Is this in testing? Do you have a debian

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

2022-06-21 Thread Joe
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 12:35:08 +0100 Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: > On 21/06/2022 11:53, Siard wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:05 +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: > >> On 20/06/2022 14:55, Siard wrote: > >>> On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:21 +0200, Anders Andersson wrote: > Has something change

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

2022-06-21 Thread Boyan Penkov
On 6/21/22 07:35, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: On 21/06/2022 11:53, Siard wrote: On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:05 +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: On 20/06/2022 14:55, Siard wrote: On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:21 +0200, Anders Andersson wrote: : www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch04.html#additions-linux I sho

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

2022-06-21 Thread Peter Hillier-Brook
On 21/06/2022 11:53, Siard wrote: On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:05 +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: On 20/06/2022 14:55, Siard wrote: On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:21 +0200, Anders Andersson wrote: Has something changed that makes virtualbox workable again, I have the Virtualbox 6.1.34 package for Debian

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

2022-06-21 Thread Siard
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:05 +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: > On 20/06/2022 14:55, Siard wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:21 +0200, Anders Andersson wrote: > > > Has something changed that makes virtualbox workable again, > > > > I have the Virtualbox 6.1.34 package for Debian 11, downloaded from

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

2022-06-20 Thread Peter Hillier-Brook
On 20/06/2022 14:55, Siard wrote: On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:21 +0200, Anders Andersson wrote: Has something changed that makes virtualbox workable again, I have the Virtualbox 6.1.34 package for Debian 11, downloaded from www.virtualbox.org, working fine in Debian 12 (Bookworm). Have you succeed

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

2022-06-20 Thread Siard
On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:21 +0200, Anders Andersson wrote: > Has something changed that makes virtualbox workable again, I have the Virtualbox 6.1.34 package for Debian 11, downloaded from www.virtualbox.org, working fine in Debian 12 (Bookworm).

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

2022-06-20 Thread Brad Rogers
On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:21:53 +0200 Anders Andersson wrote: Hello Anders, >Has something changed that makes virtualbox workable again, or has it >*always* been available in sid? It's always(1) been available in sid. VB has still got the same issue WRT migrating to testing; Work may still be on

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

2022-06-20 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 02:21:53PM +0200, Anders Andersson wrote: > I remember when Virtualbox was removed from debian, and I remember the > reasons. That's why I was surprised when I saw a recent message to the > list where a user tried to install it. Searching for "virtualbox" > indeed shows me t

Status of Virtualbox in debian

2022-06-20 Thread Anders Andersson
I remember when Virtualbox was removed from debian, and I remember the reasons. That's why I was surprised when I saw a recent message to the list where a user tried to install it. Searching for "virtualbox" indeed shows me that it is available in stretch-backports and sid: https://packages.debian.

Re: Status of Bookworm

2021-12-03 Thread Keith Bainbridge
On 4/12/21 13:03, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 12:30:52PM +1100, Keith Bainbridge wrote: netinst is cli only ... what? NO! try sudo tasksel and choose desktop options. xfce is listed The netinst image contains the same installer as the full DVD-1 image does. Good aftern

Re: Status of Bookworm

2021-12-03 Thread Nicholas Geovanis
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021, 9:25 PM Kenneth Parker wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 3, 2021, 9:33 PM Kenneth Parker wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 3, 2021, 9:03 PM Greg Wooledge wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 12:30:52PM +1100, Keith Bainbridge wrote: >>> > netinst is cli only >>> >>> ... what? NO! >>>

Re: Status of Bookworm

2021-12-03 Thread Kenneth Parker
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021, 9:33 PM Kenneth Parker wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 3, 2021, 9:03 PM Greg Wooledge wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 12:30:52PM +1100, Keith Bainbridge wrote: >> > netinst is cli only >> >> ... what? NO! >> >> > try >> > >> > sudo tasksel >> > >> > and choose desktop options.

Re: Status of Bookworm

2021-12-03 Thread Kenneth Parker
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021, 9:03 PM Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 12:30:52PM +1100, Keith Bainbridge wrote: > > netinst is cli only > > ... what? NO! > > > try > > > > sudo tasksel > > > > and choose desktop options. xfce is listed > > The netinst image contains the same installer as

Re: Status of Bookworm

2021-12-03 Thread Kenneth Parker
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021, 8:48 PM Keith Bainbridge wrote: > Good morning Kenneth > > netinst is cli only > > try > > sudo tasksel > > and choose desktop options. xfce is listed > Actually, I went in a different direction: Reformatted the qemu vm, downloaded the Bookworm DVD-1, and am installing now

Re: Status of Bookworm

2021-12-03 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 12:30:52PM +1100, Keith Bainbridge wrote: > netinst is cli only ... what? NO! > try > > sudo tasksel > > and choose desktop options. xfce is listed The netinst image contains the same installer as the full DVD-1 image does. The task selection menu that you get at the

Re: Status of Bookworm

2021-12-03 Thread Keith Bainbridge
Good morning Kenneth netinst is cli only try sudo tasksel and choose desktop options. xfce is listed All the best Keith Bainbridge keith.bainbridge.3...@gmail.com 0447 667 468 On 4/12/21 10:44, Kenneth Parker wrote: When reading about changes to Bookworm (i.e. Enforcement of usrmerge), I

Status of Bookworm

2021-12-03 Thread Kenneth Parker
When reading about changes to Bookworm (i.e. Enforcement of usrmerge), I figured that it is worth a qemu Install. So I downloaded the current Testing netinst cd and selected Expert Install. The reason for this email is that it does not give any Graphical Desktop options. (I am partial to Xfce,

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-30 Thread riveravaldez
ect: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - >> Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net) >> >> >> Hi, my case was similar, while in Debian I use just >> /etc/network/interfaces >> file or NM, in a Dell laptop with Arch I was using W

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-30 Thread David Wright
On Thu 30 Sep 2021 at 14:11:51 (-0400), Lee wrote: > On 9/30/21, Stella Ashburne wrote: > >> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 11:48 PM > >> From: to...@de > >> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:14:05AM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote: > >> > >> [...] > >> > >> > What baffels me is though, at what

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-30 Thread Brian
On Thu 30 Sep 2021 at 19:33:45 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:23:45PM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 05:48:19PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > [...] > > > > At least that's how I learn. > > > > > > > That is not me. > > People tend

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-30 Thread tomas
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 02:05:50PM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote: [...] > No apology necessary. OK, thanks. > I know I am opinionated and right in your > face (and a reverse snob as my wife regularly points out). > But I am also a big boy, I can take it if you yell back at me. Still I try hard

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-30 Thread David Wright
On Thu 30 Sep 2021 at 15:55:54 (+0200), Stella Ashburne wrote: > > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 1:22 PM > > From: "David Wright" > > > [Security] > > > PreSharedKey=a long string of alphanumeric characters > > > Passphrase=aquickbrownfoxjumpsoverthelazydog > > > > I take it that you edi

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-30 Thread David Wright
On Thu 30 Sep 2021 at 16:09:44 (+0200), Stella Ashburne wrote: > > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 6:06 AM > > From: "Dan Ritter" > > > > Might I suggest wicd, which people here do have experience with > > and have used successfully? > > > Before writing this reply, I checked with packages.d

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-30 Thread Lee
On 9/30/21, Stella Ashburne wrote: > Hi Tomas > >> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 11:48 PM >> From: to...@de >> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org >> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - >> Connection status show OK

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-30 Thread Brian
On Thu 30 Sep 2021 at 12:23:45 -0400, Henning Follmann wrote: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 05:48:19PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:14:05AM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > What baffels me is though, at what length someone would go to not use th

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-30 Thread Henning Follmann
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 07:33:45PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:23:45PM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 05:48:19PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > [...] > > > > At least that's how I learn. > > > > > > > That is not me. > > People te

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-30 Thread tomas
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:23:45PM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 05:48:19PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: [...] > > At least that's how I learn. > > > > That is not me. People tend to be different. That makes things... interesting. > I will not encourage anyone to

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-30 Thread rhkramer
On Thursday, September 30, 2021 12:28:54 PM Stella Ashburne wrote: > Your statement: "Be bold, go where no man has gone before" > > I suppose that "man" refers to both men and women, right? (Just kidding. In > this time and age, one has to be seen to be politically correct, yes?) Yes, or at least

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-30 Thread Dan Ritter
Stella Ashburne wrote: > Hi > > Thanks for your words of encouragement. > > > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 11:39 PM > > From: rhkra...@gmail.com > > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > > Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-30 Thread Dan Ritter
Stella Ashburne wrote: > Hi Dan > > > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 11:15 PM > > From: "Dan Ritter" > > To: "Stella Ashburne" > > Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org > > Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless networ

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-30 Thread Stella Ashburne
Hi Thanks for your words of encouragement. > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 11:39 PM > From: rhkra...@gmail.com > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - > Connection status show OK but unable to surf

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-30 Thread Henning Follmann
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 05:48:19PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:14:05AM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote: > > [...] > > > What baffels me is though, at what length someone would go to not use the > > default > > methods to connect via wifi. Especially when they showe

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-30 Thread Stella Ashburne
Hi Tomas > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 11:48 PM > From: to...@tuxteam.de > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - > Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net) > > On Thu, Sep 30, 202

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-30 Thread Stella Ashburne
Hi Dan > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 11:15 PM > From: "Dan Ritter" > To: "Stella Ashburne" > Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - > Connection status show OK but unable to su

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-30 Thread Henning Follmann
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 04:54:17PM +0200, Stella Ashburne wrote: > Hi Henning > > > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 10:14 PM > > From: "Henning Follmann" > > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > > Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-30 Thread tomas
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:14:05AM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote: [...] > What baffels me is though, at what length someone would go to not use the > default > methods to connect via wifi. Especially when they showed limited experience > in networking in the first place. This remark was, IMO,

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-30 Thread rhkramer
On Thursday, September 30, 2021 10:54:17 AM Stella Ashburne wrote: > Yes, their email address are displayed on the project's website. > > No, they didn't mention that any Tom, Dick and Harry are welcome to write > to them. Well, thank goodness your name is Stella ;-) (Sorry!) I think the impl

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-30 Thread Dan Ritter
Stella Ashburne wrote: > Oh dear! Oh dear! > > After a reboot, I typed the following word at the command prompt: > > iwctl > > Next, I typed > > station wlan0 show > > The output was: No device found Try ip link show and look for the name of a device which could be your wifi NIC. -dsr-

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-30 Thread Stella Ashburne
Hi Henning > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 10:14 PM > From: "Henning Follmann" > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - > Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net) > > > Tha

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-30 Thread Stella Ashburne
Oh dear! Oh dear! > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 1:22 PM > From: "David Wright" > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - > Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net) > > >

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-30 Thread rhkramer
On Thursday, September 30, 2021 09:19:45 AM Stella Ashburne wrote: > Do you think any one of them will reply to my email? It's a long shot, I > know. You don't have much to lose by sending an email. If it would require a long email that would take you a fair amount of time to write, you might wr

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-30 Thread Henning Follmann
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 03:19:45PM +0200, Stella Ashburne wrote: > Hi > > > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 2:29 PM > > From: to...@tuxteam.de > > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > > Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - >

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-30 Thread Stella Ashburne
Hi Dan, Thanks for your reply. > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 6:06 AM > From: "Dan Ritter" > To: "Stella Ashburne" > Cc: "debian-user mailing list" > Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - > Conn

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-30 Thread Stella Ashburne
Hola David > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 1:22 PM > From: "David Wright" > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - > Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net) > > > So t

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-30 Thread Stella Ashburne
Hi David > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 1:25 PM > From: "David Wright" > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - > Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net) > > > Err,

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-30 Thread Stella Ashburne
Hi Thanks for sharing your experience with me. > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 2:38 PM > From: "riveravaldez" > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - > Connection status show OK but unable to s

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-30 Thread Stella Ashburne
Hi > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 2:29 PM > From: to...@tuxteam.de > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - > Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net) > > I don't know about i

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-29 Thread riveravaldez
On 9/30/21, David Wright wrote: > On Wed 29 Sep 2021 at 18:06:12 (-0400), Dan Ritter wrote: > >> [ … ] However, while I know a fair amount about >> networking, I don't know anything about iwd. >> >> Very few people here have experience with iwd. It does not yet >> seem to be working for you. >> >>

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-29 Thread tomas
bject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - > > Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net) > > > > Stella Ashburne wrote: > > > Hi Dan > > > > > > Setting static IP address in network configuration > > > Add

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-29 Thread David Wright
On Wed 29 Sep 2021 at 18:06:12 (-0400), Dan Ritter wrote: > [ … ] However, while I know a fair amount about > networking, I don't know anything about iwd. > > Very few people here have experience with iwd. It does not yet > seem to be working for you. > > Might I suggest wicd, which people here

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-29 Thread David Wright
On Wed 29 Sep 2021 at 15:18:44 (+0200), Stella Ashburne wrote: > > Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 at 4:45 AM > > From: "Dan Ritter" > > > > Try > > > > sudo dhclient wlan0 > > > > and see if that gives you an IP and a default route, at which > > point apt update should work. > > > > I tried

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-29 Thread Charles Curley
On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 15:04:21 +0200 Stella Ashburne wrote: > What is the exact location of .emacs file? ~/.emacs In case you don't speak fluent Unix, the tilde (~) expands to the user's home directory. So that is a shorthand way of saying, $HOME/.emacs "Dot files", files with a leading dot, ar

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-29 Thread Dan Ritter
Stella Ashburne wrote: > Hi Dan > > > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 3:09 AM > > From: "Dan Ritter" > > To: "Stella Ashburne" > > Cc: "debian-user mailing list" > > Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless n

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-29 Thread Stella Ashburne
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 3:36 AM > From: "Greg Wooledge" > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - > Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net) > > [.} > > It

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-29 Thread Stella Ashburne
Hi Dan > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 3:09 AM > From: "Dan Ritter" > To: "Stella Ashburne" > Cc: "debian-user mailing list" > Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - > Connection status show OK but u

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-29 Thread Reco
Hi. On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 03:36:29PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > Debian doesn't use "iwd" (whatever that is) to configure network > interfaces. Whatever created this file, it's not being used. That statement is incorrect. Even then "Debian" actually means "an OS installation", iwd is

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-29 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 03:09:55PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote: > Stella Ashburne wrote: > > [IPv4] > > Address=192.168.1.10 > > Netmask=255.255.255.0 > > Gateway=192.168.1.1 > > Broadcast=192.168.1.255 > > DNS=192.168.1.1 > > > > In the above example the broadcast IP is 192.168.1.255. > > > > Quest

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-29 Thread Dan Ritter
Stella Ashburne wrote: > Hi Dan > > Setting static IP address in network configuration > Add the following section to /var/lib/iwd/network.type file. For example: > > /var/lib/iwd/spaceship.psk > [IPv4] > Address=192.168.1.10 > Netmask=255.255.255.0 > Gateway=192.168.1.1 > Broadcast=192.168.1.25

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-29 Thread Stella Ashburne
Hi Dan > Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 at 10:08 PM > From: "Dan Ritter" > To: "Stella Ashburne" > Cc: "debian-user mailing list" > Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - > Connection status show OK but un

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-29 Thread Dan Ritter
Stella Ashburne wrote: > Hi Dan > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 at 9:30 PM > > From: "Dan Ritter" > > To: "Stella Ashburne" > > Cc: "debian-user mailing list" > > Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless n

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-29 Thread Stella Ashburne
Hi Dan > Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 at 9:30 PM > From: "Dan Ritter" > To: "Stella Ashburne" > Cc: "debian-user mailing list" > Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - > Connection status show OK but

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-29 Thread Dan Ritter
Stella Ashburne wrote: > Hi Dan > > Thanks for your reply. > > May I refer you to the sub-section titled "Setting static IP address in > network configuration" of ArchLinux' wiki on iwd > (https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Iwd). > > My file whitecollar.psk located in /var/lib/iwd/ has the foll

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-29 Thread Stella Ashburne
Hi Dan Thanks for your reply. > Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 at 4:45 AM > From: "Dan Ritter" > To: "Stella Ashburne" > Cc: "debian-user mailing list" > Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - > Conn

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-29 Thread Stella Ashburne
Hi guys Thanks for your replies. > Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 at 6:20 AM > From: "Jude DaShiell" > To: "Dan Ritter" , "Stella Ashburne" > , "debian-user mailing list" > Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless netwo

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-28 Thread Jude DaShiell
Have you got: (setq gnutls-algorithm-priority "NORMAL:-VERS-TLS1.3") in your .emacs file? The internet broke for emacs a while ago and this line fixed that problem. It may also have done some other things as well. On Tue, 28 Sep 2021, Dan Ritter wrote: > Stella Ashburne wrote: > > Based on Arc

Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 - Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)

2021-09-28 Thread Dan Ritter
Stella Ashburne wrote: > Based on ArchLinux's tutorial on using iwd to connect to a wireless network > (https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Iwd), I managed to connect to my wireless > routeror so I thought :( > > Below are the relevant outputs: > > Station: wl

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >