-- Forwarded message -
De: Mail Delivery Subsystem
Date: mar, 2 abr 2024 a las 15:11
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
To:
[image: Icono de error]
No se ha encontrado la dirección
Tu mensaje no se ha entregado a *al.privado...@a.la.lista.com* porque no se
ha
Q9uvJW1lZa
oASmDhoyNijntU9UjA6h/Bzx6ZJvLHlE
; unsigned answer
debian.map.fastlydns.net. 30IN A 146.75.74.132
After checking the status using Verisign
(https://dnssec-debugger.verisignlabs.com/deb.debian.org), I understand
Debian is using a CDN (Content Delivery Network).
Is there a stable dom
On 03/03/2024 14:03, Max Nikulin wrote:
On 03/03/2024 16:39, Andre Rodier wrote:
Is there a stable domain we can use that doesn't rely on a CDN, please ?
https://www.debian.org/mirror/list
APT relies on GPG signed metadata, so DNSSEC is not necessary for
repositories.
Thanks, this make
On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 02:06:00PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 09:39:42AM +, Andre Rodier wrote:
> > I was checking the Debian domain, and noticed that it is DNSSEC compliant.
> >
> > However, when I check "deb.debian.org", the DNS validation fails.
>
> Things in the
ZJvLHlE
; unsigned answer
debian.map.fastlydns.net. 30IN A 146.75.74.132
> After checking the status using Verisign
> (https://dnssec-debugger.verisignlabs.com/deb.debian.org), I understand
> Debian is using a CDN (Content Delivery Network).
>
> Is there a stable d
On 03/03/2024 16:39, Andre Rodier wrote:
Is there a stable domain we can use that doesn't rely on a CDN, please ?
https://www.debian.org/mirror/list
APT relies on GPG signed metadata, so DNSSEC is not necessary for
repositories.
Hello,
I was checking the Debian domain, and noticed that it is DNSSEC compliant.
However, when I check "deb.debian.org", the DNS validation fails.
After checking the status using Verisign
(https://dnssec-debugger.verisignlabs.com/deb.debian.org), I understand
Debian is using a CD
Hi everybody!
Normally I am quite good at finding out if and why not something is
packaged in Debian, but I have not found any information about ISC
Stork, basically an optional accessory to ISC Kea.
While migrating to Kea from ISC dhcpd, I noticed that this component is
not packaged Or have I
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 04:45:25PM +0300, Petros Pap wrote:
> root@server:~# mysql -u root
> ERROR 1045 (28000): Access denied for user 'root'@'localhost' (using
> password: NO)
I believe that the Debian packaging of MariaDB is by default set up
to allow socket authentication for
top mariadb.service
root@server:~# systemctl restart mariadb.service
root@server:~# systemctl status mariadb.service
● mariadb.service - MariaDB 10.11.3 database server
Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/mariadb.service; enabled; preset:
enabled)
Active: active (running) since Mon 2023-10-02 16:04
El 23/9/22 a las 9:40, Antonio Trujillo Carmona escribió:
Un servidor que funciona sin error aparente da:
# systemctl status
● gr00swebhgra28
State: *degraded*
Jobs: 0 queued
Failed: 1 units
...
revisando todos los servicios me dan todos correctos, por ejemplo:
# systemctl status
El 2022-09-23 a las 09:40 +0200, Antonio Trujillo Carmona escribió:
> Un servidor que funciona sin error aparente da:
> # systemctl status
> ● gr00swebhgra28
> State: *degraded*
> Jobs: 0 queued
> Failed: 1 units
> ...
¿Qué tipo de servicio es ese?
> revisand
Un servidor que funciona sin error aparente da:
# systemctl status
● gr00swebhgra28
State: *degraded*
Jobs: 0 queued
Failed: 1 units
...
revisando todos los servicios me dan todos correctos, por ejemplo:
# systemctl status dbus
● dbus.service - D-Bus System Message Bus
Loaded
On Sat, 9 Jul 2022, Tim Woodall wrote:
Hi
$ APT_CONFIG=../apt/apt.conf.buster.amd64 apt-cache policy dpkg
dpkg:
Installed: 1.20.10
Candidate: 1.20.10
Version table:
*** 1.20.10 100
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
1.19.8 500
500 http://aptmirror17.home.woodall.me.uk/local buster
Tim Woodall wrote:
> Hi
>
> $ APT_CONFIG=../apt/apt.conf.buster.amd64 apt-cache policy dpkg
> dpkg:
> Installed: 1.20.10
> Candidate: 1.20.10
> Version table:
> *** 1.20.10 100
> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
> 1.19.8 500
> 500 http://apt
Hi
$ APT_CONFIG=../apt/apt.conf.buster.amd64 apt-cache policy dpkg
dpkg:
Installed: 1.20.10
Candidate: 1.20.10
Version table:
*** 1.20.10 100
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
1.19.8 500
500 http://aptmirror17.home.woodall.me.uk/local buster/essential amd64
Packages
On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 17:25 +1000, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> On 21/6/22 20:53, Siard wrote:
> > I should also note that right now there appear to be problems with the
> > latest
> > kernel, 5.18.0. The message in the terminal where VB was started from, says:
> > "WARNING: The vboxdrv kernel module
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 13:28 -0400, Boyan Penkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022, 13:26 Siard wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 07:48 -0400, Boyan Penkov wrote:
> > > ... ensuring linux-kernel-headers for 5.18 were installed, and then
> > > reinstalling virtualbox and virtualbox-dkms resolved the issue
Le lundi 20 juin 2022 à 14:21 +0200, Anders Andersson a écrit :
> I remember when Virtualbox was removed from debian, and I remember
> the
> reasons. That's why I was surprised when I saw a recent message to
> the
> list where a user tried to install it. Searching for "virtualbox"
> indeed
On 21/6/22 20:53, Siard wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:05 +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
On 20/06/2022 14:55, Siard wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:21 +0200, Anders Andersson wrote:
Has something changed that makes virtualbox workable again,
I have the Virtualbox 6.1.34 package for Debian
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 7:32 PM Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
>
> On 21/06/2022 12:48, Boyan Penkov wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 6/21/22 07:35, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> >> On 21/06/2022 11:53, Siard wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:05 +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> On 20/06/2022 14:55,
On 21/06/2022 12:48, Boyan Penkov wrote:
On 6/21/22 07:35, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
On 21/06/2022 11:53, Siard wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:05 +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
On 20/06/2022 14:55, Siard wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:21 +0200, Anders Andersson wrote: :
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 13:31:11 +0100
Joe wrote:
>
>Yes, I was using it a few years ago, and a new Debian kernel made the
>guest additions unusable. I forget what I needed them for, but gave up
>on VB then. I dare say a later version of the VB additions fixed the
>problem, but there was no knowing
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022, 13:26 Siard wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 07:48 -0400, Boyan Penkov wrote:
> > ... ensuring linux-kernel-headers for 5.18 were installed, and then
> > reinstalling virtualbox and virtualbox-dkms resolved the issue for me.
> > I can confirm this is working on 5.18.0-1-amd64
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 07:48 -0400, Boyan Penkov wrote:
> ... ensuring linux-kernel-headers for 5.18 were installed, and then
> reinstalling virtualbox and virtualbox-dkms resolved the issue for me.
> I can confirm this is working on 5.18.0-1-amd64 right now.
Is this in testing? Do you have a debian
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 12:35:08 +0100
Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> On 21/06/2022 11:53, Siard wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:05 +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> >> On 20/06/2022 14:55, Siard wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:21 +0200, Anders Andersson wrote:
> Has something
On 6/21/22 07:35, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
On 21/06/2022 11:53, Siard wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:05 +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
On 20/06/2022 14:55, Siard wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:21 +0200, Anders Andersson wrote: :
www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch04.html#additions-linux
I
On 21/06/2022 11:53, Siard wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:05 +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
On 20/06/2022 14:55, Siard wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:21 +0200, Anders Andersson wrote:
Has something changed that makes virtualbox workable again,
I have the Virtualbox 6.1.34 package for
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:05 +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> On 20/06/2022 14:55, Siard wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:21 +0200, Anders Andersson wrote:
> > > Has something changed that makes virtualbox workable again,
> >
> > I have the Virtualbox 6.1.34 package for Debian 11, downloaded
On 20/06/2022 14:55, Siard wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:21 +0200, Anders Andersson wrote:
Has something changed that makes virtualbox workable again,
I have the Virtualbox 6.1.34 package for Debian 11, downloaded from
www.virtualbox.org, working fine in Debian 12 (Bookworm).
Have you
On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:21 +0200, Anders Andersson wrote:
> Has something changed that makes virtualbox workable again,
I have the Virtualbox 6.1.34 package for Debian 11, downloaded from
www.virtualbox.org, working fine in Debian 12 (Bookworm).
On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:21:53 +0200
Anders Andersson wrote:
Hello Anders,
>Has something changed that makes virtualbox workable again, or has it
>*always* been available in sid?
It's always(1) been available in sid. VB has still got the same issue
WRT migrating to testing; Work may still be
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 02:21:53PM +0200, Anders Andersson wrote:
> I remember when Virtualbox was removed from debian, and I remember the
> reasons. That's why I was surprised when I saw a recent message to the
> list where a user tried to install it. Searching for "virtualbox"
> indeed shows me
I remember when Virtualbox was removed from debian, and I remember the
reasons. That's why I was surprised when I saw a recent message to the
list where a user tried to install it. Searching for "virtualbox"
indeed shows me that it is available in stretch-backports and sid:
On 4/12/21 13:03, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 12:30:52PM +1100, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
netinst is cli only
... what? NO!
try
sudo tasksel
and choose desktop options. xfce is listed
The netinst image contains the same installer as the full DVD-1 image
does.
Good
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021, 9:25 PM Kenneth Parker wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2021, 9:33 PM Kenneth Parker wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 3, 2021, 9:03 PM Greg Wooledge wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 12:30:52PM +1100, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
>>> > netinst is cli only
>>>
>>> ... what? NO!
>>>
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021, 9:33 PM Kenneth Parker wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2021, 9:03 PM Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 12:30:52PM +1100, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
>> > netinst is cli only
>>
>> ... what? NO!
>>
>> > try
>> >
>> > sudo tasksel
>> >
>> > and choose desktop
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021, 9:03 PM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 12:30:52PM +1100, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> > netinst is cli only
>
> ... what? NO!
>
> > try
> >
> > sudo tasksel
> >
> > and choose desktop options. xfce is listed
>
> The netinst image contains the same installer as
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021, 8:48 PM Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> Good morning Kenneth
>
> netinst is cli only
>
> try
>
> sudo tasksel
>
> and choose desktop options. xfce is listed
>
Actually, I went in a different direction: Reformatted the qemu vm,
downloaded the Bookworm DVD-1, and am installing
On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 12:30:52PM +1100, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> netinst is cli only
... what? NO!
> try
>
> sudo tasksel
>
> and choose desktop options. xfce is listed
The netinst image contains the same installer as the full DVD-1 image
does.
The task selection menu that you get at
Good morning Kenneth
netinst is cli only
try
sudo tasksel
and choose desktop options. xfce is listed
All the best
Keith Bainbridge
keith.bainbridge.3...@gmail.com
0447 667 468
On 4/12/21 10:44, Kenneth Parker wrote:
When reading about changes to Bookworm (i.e. Enforcement of usrmerge), I
When reading about changes to Bookworm (i.e. Enforcement of usrmerge), I
figured that it is worth a qemu Install. So I downloaded the current
Testing netinst cd and selected Expert Install.
The reason for this email is that it does not give any Graphical Desktop
options. (I am partial to Xfce,
Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
>> Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
>>
>>
>> Hi, my case was similar, while in Debian I use just
>> /etc/network/interfaces
>> file or NM, in a Dell laptop with Arch I was using Wic
On Thu 30 Sep 2021 at 14:11:51 (-0400), Lee wrote:
> On 9/30/21, Stella Ashburne wrote:
> >> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 11:48 PM
> >> From: to...@de
> >> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:14:05AM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote:
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> > What baffels me is though, at what
On Thu 30 Sep 2021 at 19:33:45 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:23:45PM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 05:48:19PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > At least that's how I learn.
> > >
> >
> > That is not me.
>
> People tend
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 02:05:50PM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote:
[...]
> No apology necessary.
OK, thanks.
> I know I am opinionated and right in your
> face (and a reverse snob as my wife regularly points out).
> But I am also a big boy, I can take it if you yell back at me.
Still I try
On Thu 30 Sep 2021 at 15:55:54 (+0200), Stella Ashburne wrote:
> > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 1:22 PM
> > From: "David Wright"
> > > [Security]
> > > PreSharedKey=a long string of alphanumeric characters
> > > Passphrase=aquickbrownfoxjumpsoverthelazydog
> >
> > I take it that you
On Thu 30 Sep 2021 at 16:09:44 (+0200), Stella Ashburne wrote:
> > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 6:06 AM
> > From: "Dan Ritter"
> >
> > Might I suggest wicd, which people here do have experience with
> > and have used successfully?
> >
> Before writing this reply, I checked with
On 9/30/21, Stella Ashburne wrote:
> Hi Tomas
>
>> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 11:48 PM
>> From: to...@de
>> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
>> Connection statu
On Thu 30 Sep 2021 at 12:23:45 -0400, Henning Follmann wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 05:48:19PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:14:05AM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > What baffels me is though, at what length someone would go to not use
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 07:33:45PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:23:45PM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 05:48:19PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > At least that's how I learn.
> > >
> >
> > That is not me.
>
> People
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:23:45PM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 05:48:19PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> > At least that's how I learn.
> >
>
> That is not me.
People tend to be different. That makes things... interesting.
> I will not encourage anyone to
On Thursday, September 30, 2021 12:28:54 PM Stella Ashburne wrote:
> Your statement: "Be bold, go where no man has gone before"
>
> I suppose that "man" refers to both men and women, right? (Just kidding. In
> this time and age, one has to be seen to be politically correct, yes?)
Yes, or at
Stella Ashburne wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks for your words of encouragement.
>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 11:39 PM
> > From: rhkra...@gmail.com
> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (
Stella Ashburne wrote:
> Hi Dan
>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 11:15 PM
> > From: "Dan Ritter"
> > To: "Stella Ashburne"
> > Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless net
Hi
Thanks for your words of encouragement.
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 11:39 PM
> From: rhkra...@gmail.com
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but unable
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 05:48:19PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:14:05AM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > What baffels me is though, at what length someone would go to not use the
> > default
> > methods to connect via wifi. Especially when they
Hi Tomas
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 11:48 PM
> From: to...@tuxteam.de
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 202
Hi Dan
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 11:15 PM
> From: "Dan Ritter"
> To: "Stella Ashburne"
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but unable to su
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 04:54:17PM +0200, Stella Ashburne wrote:
> Hi Henning
>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 10:14 PM
> > From: "Henning Follmann"
> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:14:05AM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote:
[...]
> What baffels me is though, at what length someone would go to not use the
> default
> methods to connect via wifi. Especially when they showed limited experience
> in networking in the first place.
This remark was, IMO,
On Thursday, September 30, 2021 10:54:17 AM Stella Ashburne wrote:
> Yes, their email address are displayed on the project's website.
>
> No, they didn't mention that any Tom, Dick and Harry are welcome to write
> to them.
Well, thank goodness your name is Stella ;-) (Sorry!)
I think the
Stella Ashburne wrote:
> Oh dear! Oh dear!
>
> After a reboot, I typed the following word at the command prompt:
>
> iwctl
>
> Next, I typed
>
> station wlan0 show
>
> The output was: No device found
Try
ip link show
and look for the name of a device which could be your wifi NIC.
-dsr-
Hi Henning
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 10:14 PM
> From: "Henning Follmann"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
>
>
> Tha
Oh dear! Oh dear!
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 1:22 PM
> From: "David Wright"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
>
> >
On Thursday, September 30, 2021 09:19:45 AM Stella Ashburne wrote:
> Do you think any one of them will reply to my email? It's a long shot, I
> know.
You don't have much to lose by sending an email. If it would require a long
email that would take you a fair amount of time to write, you might
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 03:19:45PM +0200, Stella Ashburne wrote:
> Hi
>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 2:29 PM
> > From: to...@tuxteam.de
> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
Hi Dan,
Thanks for your reply.
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 6:06 AM
> From: "Dan Ritter"
> To: "Stella Ashburne"
> Cc: "debian-user mailing list"
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Conn
Hola David
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 1:22 PM
> From: "David Wright"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
>
>
> So t
Hi David
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 1:25 PM
> From: "David Wright"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
>
>
> Err,
Hi
Thanks for sharing your experience with me.
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 2:38 PM
> From: "riveravaldez"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but unable to s
Hi
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 2:29 PM
> From: to...@tuxteam.de
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
>
> I don't know about iwd sp
On 9/30/21, David Wright wrote:
> On Wed 29 Sep 2021 at 18:06:12 (-0400), Dan Ritter wrote:
>
>> [ … ] However, while I know a fair amount about
>> networking, I don't know anything about iwd.
>>
>> Very few people here have experience with iwd. It does not yet
>> seem to be working for you.
>>
bject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> > Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
> >
> > Stella Ashburne wrote:
> > > Hi Dan
> > >
> > > Setting static IP address in network configuration
> > > Add
On Wed 29 Sep 2021 at 18:06:12 (-0400), Dan Ritter wrote:
> [ … ] However, while I know a fair amount about
> networking, I don't know anything about iwd.
>
> Very few people here have experience with iwd. It does not yet
> seem to be working for you.
>
> Might I suggest wicd, which people here
On Wed 29 Sep 2021 at 15:18:44 (+0200), Stella Ashburne wrote:
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 at 4:45 AM
> > From: "Dan Ritter"
> >
> > Try
> >
> > sudo dhclient wlan0
> >
> > and see if that gives you an IP and a default route, at which
> > point apt update should work.
> >
>
> I
On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 15:04:21 +0200
Stella Ashburne wrote:
> What is the exact location of .emacs file?
~/.emacs
In case you don't speak fluent Unix, the tilde (~) expands to the
user's home directory. So that is a shorthand way of saying,
$HOME/.emacs
"Dot files", files with a leading dot,
Stella Ashburne wrote:
> Hi Dan
>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 3:09 AM
> > From: "Dan Ritter"
> > To: "Stella Ashburne"
> > Cc: "debian-user mailing list"
> > Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless n
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 3:36 AM
> From: "Greg Wooledge"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
>
> [.}
&
Hi Dan
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 3:09 AM
> From: "Dan Ritter"
> To: "Stella Ashburne"
> Cc: "debian-user mailing list"
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but u
Hi.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 03:36:29PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Debian doesn't use "iwd" (whatever that is) to configure network
> interfaces. Whatever created this file, it's not being used.
That statement is incorrect.
Even then "Debian" actually means "an OS installation", iwd
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 03:09:55PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Stella Ashburne wrote:
> > [IPv4]
> > Address=192.168.1.10
> > Netmask=255.255.255.0
> > Gateway=192.168.1.1
> > Broadcast=192.168.1.255
> > DNS=192.168.1.1
> >
> > In the above example the broadcast IP is 192.168.1.255.
> >
> >
Stella Ashburne wrote:
> Hi Dan
>
> Setting static IP address in network configuration
> Add the following section to /var/lib/iwd/network.type file. For example:
>
> /var/lib/iwd/spaceship.psk
> [IPv4]
> Address=192.168.1.10
> Netmask=255.255.255.0
> Gateway=192.168.1.1
>
Hi Dan
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 at 10:08 PM
> From: "Dan Ritter"
> To: "Stella Ashburne"
> Cc: "debian-user mailing list"
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but un
Stella Ashburne wrote:
> Hi Dan
>
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 at 9:30 PM
> > From: "Dan Ritter"
> > To: "Stella Ashburne"
> > Cc: "debian-user mailing list"
> > Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless n
Hi Dan
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 at 9:30 PM
> From: "Dan Ritter"
> To: "Stella Ashburne"
> Cc: "debian-user mailing list"
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but
Stella Ashburne wrote:
> Hi Dan
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> May I refer you to the sub-section titled "Setting static IP address in
> network configuration" of ArchLinux' wiki on iwd
> (https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Iwd).
>
> My file whitecollar.psk located in /var/lib/iwd/ has the
Hi Dan
Thanks for your reply.
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 at 4:45 AM
> From: "Dan Ritter"
> To: "Stella Ashburne"
> Cc: "debian-user mailing list"
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Conn
Hi guys
Thanks for your replies.
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 at 6:20 AM
> From: "Jude DaShiell"
> To: "Dan Ritter" , "Stella Ashburne"
> , "debian-user mailing list"
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless ne
Have you got:
(setq gnutls-algorithm-priority "NORMAL:-VERS-TLS1.3")
in your .emacs file? The internet broke for emacs a while ago and this
line fixed that problem. It may also have done some other things as well.
On Tue, 28 Sep 2021, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Stella Ashburne wrote:
> > Based on
Stella Ashburne wrote:
> Based on ArchLinux's tutorial on using iwd to connect to a wireless network
> (https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Iwd), I managed to connect to my wireless
> routeror so I thought :(
>
> Below are the relevant outputs:
>
> Station:
Based on ArchLinux's tutorial on using iwd to connect to a wireless network
(https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Iwd), I managed to connect to my wireless
routeror so I thought :(
Below are the relevant outputs:
In Terminal #1
username@hostname:~$ iwctl
[iwd]# device wlan0 show
e problems with installing additional firmware packages. Report details and logs (Xorg, dmesg, etc.) are available in the full-feature report [4]. Thanks to all for participating in the report! Looking forward to get more Debian hardware probes from the community to monitor hardware support status and trends.
ackages.
> > >
> > > Report details and logs (Xorg, dmesg, etc.) are available in the
> > > full-feature report [4].
> > >
> > > Thanks to all for participating in the report! Looking forward to get
> > > more Debian hardware probes from the com
Bret Busby wrote:
>
> And, does Debian 11 support the Intel i7 Haskell architecture?
Do you mean Haswell? If so, yes.
-dsr-
firmware packages.
Report details and logs (Xorg, dmesg, etc.) are available in the full-feature
report [4].
Thanks to all for participating in the report! Looking forward to get more
Debian hardware probes from the community to monitor hardware support status
and trends.
[1] https://github.com
installing additional firmware packages.
>
> Report details and logs (Xorg, dmesg, etc.) are available in the full-feature
> report [4].
>
> Thanks to all for participating in the report! Looking forward to get more
> Debian hardware probes from the community to monitor hardware
forward to get more
Debian hardware probes from the community to monitor hardware support status
and trends.
[1] https://github.com/linuxhw/TestCoverage/tree/main/Dist/Debian_11
[2] https://github.com/linuxhw/TestCoverage/tree/main/Dist/Debian_10
[3] https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2021/04
- Forwarded message from Paul Gevers -
Date: Sun, 2 May 2021 21:41:38 +0200
From: Paul Gevers
To: Debian Devel Announce
Subject: bits from the Release Team: bullseye status update
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.10.0
Mail-Followup
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 04:26:06AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 03/10/2021 03:45 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Ma, 09 mar 21, 14:35:54, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > > On 03/09/2021 07:00 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > > > On Ma, 09 mar 21, 06:32:33, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > > > > On
1 - 100 of 1577 matches
Mail list logo
