Bill Allombert writes:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 09:41:49AM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote:
>> Currently, the Project has no legal standing of its
>> own, meaning that within any legal context, there is no Project.
>
> Indeed, it is a great feature of Debian that it is not bound to any
>
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 09:41:49AM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote:
> Currently, the Project has no legal standing of its
> own, meaning that within any legal context, there is no Project.
Indeed, it is a great feature of Debian that it is not bound to any
particular juridiction, it only exists
On 2022-03-21 09:41, Christian Kastner wrote:
> Currently, the Project has no legal standing of its
> own, meaning that within any legal context, there is no Project. You
> can't donate to Debian, you donate to some other organization (SPI). The
> DPL can represent the Project only formally, as
On 2022-03-20 13:10, Felix Lechner wrote:
> I'm sorry no one has gotten back to you so far. I do not know which
> ideas Jonathan Carter and Brian Gupta (copied as a courtesy) have been
> pursuing.
>
> My own thinking on this point is also evolving, as detailed below. I
> copied Christan Kastner
Gunnar Wolf wrote on 20/03/2022 at 17:44:44+0100:
> Felix Lechner dijo [Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 06:49:50AM -0700]:
>> Hi Gunnar,
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:47 PM Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>> >
>> > This year I think I will break my usual
>> > practice, and vote a certain DPL candidate below NotA
Hi Jonathan,
On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 11:09 AM Jonathan Carter wrote:
>
> How would you gauge that, Felix? It's impractical to have a vote every
> time a decision is to be made, which is why voters want to know how a
> potential DPL would make choices so that they can make an informed
> choice on
Hi Richard,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 7:53 PM Richard Laager wrote:
>
> This is a complex topic, but in broad strokes, the concept of having
> more people involved seems reasonable to me. But I fear that the idea
> and the reality may be different. How do you plan to find all the people
> to sit
Felix Lechner dijo [Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 06:49:50AM -0700]:
> Hi Gunnar,
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:47 PM Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> >
> > This year I think I will break my usual
> > practice, and vote a certain DPL candidate below NotA :-\
>
> With that statement, you potentially committed two
>
Hi Tiago,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 7:56 PM Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote:
>
> I have to say I feel really troubled by reading this. It's hard to believe
> that
> a candidate for DPL addresses a legitimate and quite sensitive question with
> such a rhetorical passive-aggressive borderline-bullying
Felix Lechner, 2022-03-20 09:50 -0400:
> Hi Gunnar,
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:47 PM Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> >
> > This year I think I will break my usual
> > practice, and vote a certain DPL candidate below NotA :-\
+1
> With that statement, you potentially committed two
>
> That is a big gray area, but restrictions exist in
> the US [3]
The Hatch Act only applies to Employees of the United States Federal
Government from engaging in political activity using their official
position (in the case of a regular, and not restricted federal
employee). You can't engage in
Hi Gunnar,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:47 PM Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>
> This year I think I will break my usual
> practice, and vote a certain DPL candidate below NotA :-\
With that statement, you potentially committed two
infractions—depending on where you live.
First, revealing a vote is widely
On 17/03/22 at 16:54 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> As someone who used to care a lot about Debian, but who hasn't been able
> to pay much attention to the project lately, I was wondering:
On 17/03/22 at 13:57 -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 12:52 PM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
Hi Bill,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 1:50 PM Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> Could someone explain what does that mean ?
I'm sorry no one has gotten back to you so far. I do not know which
ideas Jonathan Carter and Brian Gupta (copied as a courtesy) have been
pursuing.
My own thinking on this point is
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 16:54:54 +0100
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> How is Debian doing currently?
Working steadily as well as before, and providing better quality in
testing/unstable than ever (stable is also better of course).
As usual, more packages in each releases.
> What are the recent
Hi,
On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 19:34:03 +
"Andrew M.A. Cater" wrote:
> We've had the Code of Conduct for about eight years now and the Community Team
> for about as long. There are still significant differences about how some
> people feel about them, despite the Code of Conduct having been adopted
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 08:19:28 -0400
Molly dB wrote:
> I don't think it's exactly a term limit problem. In November, there was
> an email to debian-private about a small team handling some legal work
> (also mentioned in Jonathan's email). I want to know about how a new
> DPL would take over
All,
We've had the Code of Conduct for about eight years now and the Community Team
for about as long. There are still significant differences about how some
people feel about them, despite the Code of Conduct having been adopted by the
Project as a whole.
How do _you_ feel about the Code of
On 2022/03/18 20:08, Felix Lechner wrote:
Which would you be prepared to provide as DPL?
>
Whichever the members perceive as proper.
How would you gauge that, Felix? It's impractical to have a vote every
time a decision is to be made, which is why voters want to know how a
potential DPL
Tiago Bortoletto Vaz dijo [Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:56:15PM -0400]:
> > > If a Debian contributor
> > > was being harassed due to their involvement with the project, what
> > > responsibilities do you think the project would have to them?
> >
> > Did the project provide assistance to you, and do
> My response was directed at the questions Molly had posed, namely
> whether (1) contributors should be defended against third-party
> copyright claims or (2) whether contributors should be offered
> financial assistance when pursuing harassment claims in court.
As far as I'm aware, I didn't
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 05:23:42PM -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
> Hi Molly,
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 5:42 AM Molly dB wrote:
> >
> > If a Debian contributor
> > was being harassed due to their involvement with the project, what
> > responsibilities do you think the project would have to them?
On 3/18/22 10:23, Felix Lechner wrote:
I hope instead to devolve the
concentration of power from my office into an open and transparent
system of boards and commissions
This is a complex topic, but in broad strokes, the concept of having
more people involved seems reasonable to me. But I fear
Hi Molly,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 5:42 AM Molly dB wrote:
>
> If a Debian contributor
> was being harassed due to their involvement with the project, what
> responsibilities do you think the project would have to them?
Did the project provide assistance to you, and do you worry that the
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 05:30:30PM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote:
> Jonathan has already addressed this in his platform, acknowledging Brian
> Gupta's 2020 campaign focus on this, so this is mostly a question for
> Hideki and Felix:
>
> What is your position on registering Debian as an
Hi Steve,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 11:12 AM Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> Which do *you* perceive as proper?
>
> Come on, please stop evading the question.
Thank you for your persistence, but I already answered that question. [1]
Kind regards,
Felix Lechner
[1]
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 11:08:33AM -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
>Hi Steve,
>
>On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:48 AM Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>
>> Which would you be prepared to provide as DPL?
>
>Whichever the members perceive as proper.
Which do *you* perceive as proper?
Come on, please stop evading
Hi Steve,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:48 AM Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> Which would you be prepared to provide as DPL?
Whichever the members perceive as proper.
Kind regards,
Felix Lechner
Hi Ross,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:42 AM Ross Vandegrift wrote:
>
> As DPL, you may confront issues which are not wise to handle
> transparently. This could be due to negative social consequnces, legal
> advice, etc. You answer makes me concerned that you intend to either:
> - refuse to work
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:43:49AM -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
>Hi Steve,
>
>On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:19 AM Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>
>> Hmmm.. Do you not feel that project should stand with and support
>> contributors facing harassment because of their work in Debian?
>
>Are you asking for
Hi Steve,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:19 AM Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> Hmmm.. Do you not feel that project should stand with and support
> contributors facing harassment because of their work in Debian?
Are you asking for empathy or for financial assistance?
Kind regards,
Felix Lechner
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 08:23:12AM -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 5:42 AM Molly dB wrote:
> >
> > I'd like to hear about where you draw the line between individual
> > issues and community wide issues. To use an example of copyright
> > claims: Would it be Debian's
Hi Felix,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 08:23:12AM -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
>
>The harassment case is easily distinguished in that (1) the victim
>seeks to initiate legal action instead of needing help with a defense,
>and (2) the project's survival is not at risk—unless the victim sues
>Debian as
Hi Molly,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 5:42 AM Molly dB wrote:
>
> I'd like to hear about where you draw the line between individual
> issues and community wide issues. To use an example of copyright
> claims: Would it be Debian's responsibility if someone raised a
> copyright claim against an
Hi Felix,
I'd like to ask a tangential question.
I'd like to hear about where you draw the line between individual
issues and community wide issues. To use an example of copyright
claims: Would it be Debian's responsibility if someone raised a
copyright claim against an individual for their
Hi Hideki,
I don't think it's exactly a term limit problem. In November, there was
an email to debian-private about a small team handling some legal work
(also mentioned in Jonathan's email). I want to know about how a new
DPL would take over this specific issue and manage future legal issues.
Hi,
> What is your position on registering Debian as an organization?
Positive (currently).
> I'm curious as to (1) what you think of the idea in general, and (2)
> insofar you think this is a good idea, to what extent you'd consider
> pursuing it during your term(s).
Reading Jonathan's
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 10:57:59 -0400
Molly dB wrote:
> In November 2021, it was discussed in debian-private that a team from
> Debian had been working with a lawyer for a while. (Not sharing
> details: issues remain ongoing.) How would you transition into taking
> on this particular
Hi Lucas,
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 12:52 PM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> Interesting. What would be the composition, roles, duties of that
> Strategy Council ?
Like all committees and boards I envision, the Strategy Council should
have at least five but no more than twelve members. I personally
Thanks for you answers
On 17/03/22 at 09:50 -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
> If elected, I hope to form a Strategy Council that will re-evaluate as
> well as expand on those answers, and have solutions ready at all
> times.
Interesting. What would be the composition, roles, duties of that
Strategy
Hi Molly,
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 10:49 AM Molly dB wrote:
>
> If you feel like it's appropriate, I'd appreciate hearing more details
> on debian-private.
Since Jonathan wrote that advances are imminent, I unfortunately do
not think it's appropriate for us to discuss it any further, in any
Hi Felix (and others),
If you feel like it's appropriate, I'd appreciate hearing more details
on debian-private.
Cheers,
Molly
On Thu, 2022-03-17 at 09:16 -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
> Hi Molly,
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 8:15 AM Molly dB wrote:
> >
> > In November 2021, it was discussed in
Hi Christian,
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 9:48 AM Christian Kastner wrote:
>
> What is your position on registering Debian as an organization?
>
> I'm curious as to (1) what you think of the idea in general, and (2)
> insofar you think this is a good idea, to what extent you'd consider
> pursuing it
Hi Molly
On 2022/03/17 16:57, Molly dB wrote:
In November 2021, it was discussed in debian-private that a team from
Debian had been working with a lawyer for a while. (Not sharing
details: issues remain ongoing.) How would you transition into taking
on this particular responsibility and similar
Hi Lucas,
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 8:55 AM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> How is Debian doing currently?
We do what we have always done, but the world is changing around us.
> What are the recent successes I might have missed?
We are quirky, but very much alive!
> Where did we fail or
Jonathan has already addressed this in his platform, acknowledging Brian
Gupta's 2020 campaign focus on this, so this is mostly a question for
Hideki and Felix:
What is your position on registering Debian as an organization?
I'm curious as to (1) what you think of the idea in general, and (2)
Hi Molly,
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 8:15 AM Molly dB wrote:
>
> In November 2021, it was discussed in debian-private that a team from
> Debian had been working with a lawyer for a while. (Not sharing
> details: issues remain ongoing.) How would you transition into taking
> on this particular
Hi,
As someone who used to care a lot about Debian, but who hasn't been able
to pay much attention to the project lately, I was wondering:
How is Debian doing currently?
What are the recent successes I might have missed?
Where did we fail or under-perform?
Which big challenges do you see
Hi Candidates,
I'm excited that you all are running and appreciate your willingness to
take on this responsibility.
In November 2021, it was discussed in debian-private that a team from
Debian had been working with a lawyer for a while. (Not sharing
details: issues remain ongoing.) How would you
Hi Hideki,
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 12:28 AM Hideki Yamane wrote:
>
> And for that, I want **YOU** (contributors) to tell current situations.
> I want to know, I want to hear, I want to talk with YOU (for the project
> and me :)
Your desire to engage with your future constituents embodies the
Hi,
> What do you think of the reform of the Technical Committee that
> introduced a limit to the time people can serve in, and would you
> consider applying a similar policy to other positions of power in
> Debian?
I'm sorry, but could you explain "what do you want to improve with
a term
Hi,
> I would like to know what is the stance of the 3 candidates on producing
> monthly "Bits from the DPL" reports on their activities.
>
> I like them very much and I think they are a great way to keep us all
> informed of what the DPL has been doing.
Yes indeed. It's important for the
Hi Charles
On 2022/03/16 14:28, Charles Plessy wrote:
thank you for running !
I have a question for you (and only you).
Yay, thanks for the question!
What do you think of the reform of the Technical Committee that
introduced a limit to the time people can serve in, and would you
consider
Hi Louis-Philippe
On 2022/03/16 20:12, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
I would like to know what is the stance of the 3 candidates on producing
monthly "Bits from the DPL" reports on their activities.
I like them very much and I think they are a great way to keep us all
informed of what the
Hi Louis-Philippe,
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 11:12 AM Louis-Philippe Véronneau
wrote:
>
> I would like to know what is the stance of the 3 candidates on producing
> monthly "Bits from the DPL" reports on their activities.
>
> I like them very much and I think they are a great way to keep us all
>
Hi Ansgar,
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 10:12 AM Ansgar wrote:
>
> You only mention delegates which have a formally easy way to get
> replaced: the project leader can just do so.
I limited my statement to delegates because my constitutional powers
end there. For other matters, I would be an advocate
Hi,
I would like to know what is the stance of the 3 candidates on producing
monthly "Bits from the DPL" reports on their activities.
I like them very much and I think they are a great way to keep us all
informed of what the DPL has been doing.
They do take time to produce though and some DPLs
Hi Felix,
On Wed, 2022-03-16 at 09:45 -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 5:28 AM Charles Plessy
> wrote:
> >
> > What do you think of the reform of the Technical Committee that
> > introduced a limit to the time people can serve in, and would you
> > consider applying a
Hi Charles,
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 5:28 AM Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> What do you think of the reform of the Technical Committee that
> introduced a limit to the time people can serve in, and would you
> consider applying a similar policy to other positions of power in
> Debian?
I am a big fan
On Wed, 2022-03-16 at 21:28 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I have a question for you (and only you).
I'll ignore that ;-)
> What do you think of the reform of the Technical Committee that
> introduced a limit to the time people can serve in
This was already introduced years ago:
Hi all candidates,
thank you for running !
I have a question for you (and only you).
What do you think of the reform of the Technical Committee that
introduced a limit to the time people can serve in, and would you
consider applying a similar policy to other positions of power in
Debian?
Have
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 1:35 PM Sean Whitton wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> In his non-platform, Sam wrote
>
> If I were running as DPL, figuring out how to do a better job of
> managing delegations, respecting both the current delegates and the
> needs of the project, would be my priority for
On 2020/03/18 19:33, Sean Whitton wrote:
> In his non-platform, Sam wrote
>
> If I were running as DPL, figuring out how to do a better job of
> managing delegations, respecting both the current delegates and the
> needs of the project, would be my priority for the next year. I
>
Hello,
In his non-platform, Sam wrote
If I were running as DPL, figuring out how to do a better job of
managing delegations, respecting both the current delegates and the
needs of the project, would be my priority for the next year. I
hope that the candidates who step forward
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 07:27:55PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
this is the echo of a question asked two years ago in the 2010 campaign.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2010/03/msg00057.html
“In ten^Weight years I'd like Debian...”:
- to be backed by a massively diverse community, even
Dear candidates,
this is the echo of a question asked two years ago in the 2010 campaign.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2010/03/msg00057.html
In addition, do you see major changes happening in the recent or next years,
and how do you think Debian should react to them ?
Have a nice day,
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 01:12, Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org wrote:
Do you have concrete suggestions for her on how it should be working?
I know that the FreeBSD community has experimented with paid development
for FreeBSD in the past; the first such attempt was done by Poul-Henning
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:57:38AM +0200, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
Hello dear candidates,
Debian project raise it's expectation every year: higher quality, more
package, more architectures, more Desktops, etc... (cool).
How do we face the challenge to do more every year?
As Marge also
[ Apologies for this late/out of time answer, I'll try hard to make this
the last time I bother the -vote-rs :-) ]
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:57:38AM +0200, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
Debian project raise it's expectation every year: higher quality, more
package, more architectures, more Desktops,
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 06:39:46PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
I'm not sure why you think so, but I do acknowledge that this
is a hard thing to implement.
Not wishing to oversimplify, this kind of strategy carries a
high risk of conditioning the horse to walk *only* if there's a
Hello,
[switching to debian-project]
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 09:57 +0200, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
Debian project raise it's expectation every year: higher quality, more
package, more architectures, more Desktops, etc... (cool).
How do we face the challenge to do more every year?
This first
Hello dear candidates,
Debian project raise it's expectation every year: higher quality, more
package, more architectures, more Desktops, etc... (cool).
How do we face the challenge to do more every year?
What would you do about it, as a DPL?
Thanks to each one of you for being candidate.
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 06:47:53AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
Agreed, but would you agree that it is a core part of the role of the
DPL/2IC, or indeed any mediator, to provide at least basic status and
progress info to the project as a whole?
Yes, absolutely. Beside this specific case---which
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 4:57 AM, Frank Lin PIAT fp...@klabs.be wrote:
Debian project raise it's expectation every year: higher quality, more
package, more architectures, more Desktops, etc... (cool).
How do we face the challenge to do more every year?
There are two important things involved:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 11:24:14AM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
One important example is fixing bugs. Developers spend quite a
lot of time fixing bugs, and most of the time you don't need to
be a DD to fix those bugs, anybody can help out fixing more
bugs.
Another example is the
Le Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:57:38AM +0200, Frank Lin PIAT a écrit :
Debian project raise it's expectation every year: higher quality, more
package, more architectures, more Desktops, etc... (cool).
How do we face the challenge to do more every year?
What would you do about it, as a DPL?
Hi
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 01:34:02AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:57:38AM +0200, Frank Lin PIAT a écrit :
Debian project raise it's expectation every year: higher quality, more
package, more architectures, more Desktops, etc... (cool).
How do we face the challenge
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Marcelo E. Magallon
mmaga...@debian.org wrote:
Simple question: How?
(in case it's not clear: since you seem to think it's part of
the DPL's responsabilities, how do you plan to attract people to
help with these things?)
I do not think it's part of the
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 03:00:29PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
I do not think it's part of the DPL responsibilities. I do
think that it's something that Debian needs and that doing it
with the DPL hat on is going to make it easier, it's not a
requirement (most stuff that DPL candidates
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Marcelo E. Magallon mmaga...@debian.org wrote:
You say it would be easier if you were DPL. Why do you think
this is the case?
It is inevitable that people will take you more seriously when you are
the appointed leader than if you are just a random developer.
Dear Margarita and Stefano,
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 04:03:00PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
[snip]
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 05:30:50PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
[snip]
Thank you for your replies. I am glad that you care about this issue,
and have voiced your opinion on how to handle
Le Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 06:27:00PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah a écrit :
My question to you is, do you envision a role for the DPL in fixing
such inadequate maintenance of important packages.
Hello Kumar,
for the moment, you have taken the way of the Technical Comitee, and this does
not require the
Hi Kumar,
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 06:27:00PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Dear Candidates,
First of all, I wish you all the very best for the elections!
At the outset, this question is not meant to be inflammatory or to
express ire at a particular individual or set of individuals involved;
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 02:57:59AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
One of the questions which I've not yet seen exactly in the
discussions is on the transparency in the maintenance of non-core but
important packages, such as python, wherein the maintenance of the
package and policy (till a
Dear Charles,
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:23:25AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
for the moment, you have taken the way of the Technical Comitee, and this does
not require the intervention of the DPL. Asking the TC to solve a disagreement
between two parties should be the occasion to write down
Kumar Appaiah a.ku...@alumni.iitm.ac.in writes:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 02:57:59AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I don't wish to comment on the specific case of python packaging.
There's been lots of things going on there, and though some of it was
in public, the thread you point to clearly
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 08:05:40PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 02:57:59AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
One of the questions which I've not yet seen exactly in the
discussions is on the transparency in the maintenance of non-core but
important packages, such as
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Discussing problems in public works very well if two people like
eachother. If they don't, however, you get two people cursing at
eachother. Now there are some people who really don't mind doing that in
public; but when things get messy, not being messy out in the open
Le Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 06:47:53AM +0200, Frans Pop a écrit :
Also, it has been claimed we cannot provide any information because
discussions are in private [1]. Do candidates agree to that, or do they
think that a DPL should make clear to parties in advance that the project
will be kept
Hi all,
the question of the core infrastructures is difficult and very important.
Le Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:30:39AM +0100, Marc Haber a écrit :
Do you see the diminishing care for our Core infrastructure as a
problem? Do you have any idea how do sensibilize our new blood for the
fact that
Le Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 09:09:43AM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl a écrit :
Suppose that you would not run for DPL: Who would you vote and why?
Hi Alexander,
I would vote for Stefano, because the impressive determination he puts in his
RC-bug of the day marathon suggest that he would do a
(And to answer to the comment ‘you do not need to be DPL for doing this’, that
is true, but if I make a bad score at this election, I will conclude that
there
are not many persons interested in what I propose anyway, and will save
everybody's
time by not discussing them further in the
Le Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:03:00AM +0800, Paul Wise a écrit :
I find that attitude problematic. When electing a DPL we get a package
deal. Some of each candidates ideas are liked by some/many, others
disliked by some/many. It would be a shame to throw out good ideas
with bad ones.
Le Mon,
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Kumar Appaiah
a.ku...@alumni.iitm.ac.in wrote:
My question to you is, do you envision a role for the DPL in fixing
such inadequate maintenance of important packages, or are you of the
opinion that is it up to the affected Debian community to stop
whining and
* Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org [100327 06:17]:
I think that the ‘RPM hell’ that you used to comment my propositions is more
related to a situation when independant distributions are using the same
package format, than when a distribution offers multiple repositories that
obey
to a policy
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 06:27:00PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
First of all, I wish you all the very best for the elections!
Hi Kumar, thanks a lot!
This has led some parts of the community (Debian Python, in this
case) to knock the doors of the tech-ctte[1] (recommended reading,
unless you
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 16:51, Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org wrote:
...
unfortunately some of the involved parties did not reply to the
offer.
Not some, just one: the Python maintainer. (as said in the bug log.)
Regards,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website:
Dear Zack,
Thanks for the response.
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 04:51:52PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
My question to you is, do you envision a role for the DPL in fixing
such inadequate maintenance of important packages, or are you of the
opinion that is it up to the affected Debian
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 09:59:08AM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
The method adopted for resolution of this conflict has, for better or
for worse, happened behind-the-scenes. Now, some in the project feel
that this is the best way to avoid a conflagration of sorts, but
others feel that this back
Le Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:15:47PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
I don't understand what cloud computing has to do with your idea of
using package priorities to release differently different sub-systems
within Debian. I'm well aware that we are currently lagging behind in
the race for
101 - 200 of 565 matches
Mail list logo
