, March 31, 2013 5:30 PM
Subject: [DISCUSS] re-visit annotation package/s
hi @ all,
we had an agreement to use a (sub-)package named annotation for all
our
annotations within a package.
however, it feels a bit clumsy if a package (currently) just contains
annotations.
e.g
+1
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Gerhard Petracek
gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:
hi @ all,
we had an agreement to use a (sub-)package named annotation for all our
annotations within a package.
however, it feels a bit clumsy if a package (currently) just contains
annotations.
e.g.
are like interfaces nowadays. So this
is
just superfluous.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2013 5:30 PM
Subject: [DISCUSS] re-visit annotation package/s
hi
this
is
just superfluous.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2013 5:30 PM
Subject: [DISCUSS] re-visit annotation package/s
hi @ all,
we had an agreement
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2013 5:30 PM
Subject: [DISCUSS] re-visit annotation package/s
hi @ all,
we had an agreement to use a (sub-)package named annotation for
all
our
annotations within a package.
however, it feels a bit clumsy
rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: gudnabr...@gmail.com; deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2013 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] re-visit annotation package/s
I dont fully agree even if i get you. For a bunch of people tlp = maturity
= stability
Le 2 avr. 2013 21:47, Matt
: [DISCUSS] re-visit annotation package/s
I dont fully agree even if i get you. For a bunch of people tlp =
maturity
= stability
Le 2 avr. 2013 21:47, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com a
écrit :
I would agree with Gerhard that TLP and 1.0 are not necessarily linked
concepts. I would
; deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2013 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] re-visit annotation package/s
I dont fully agree even if i get you. For a bunch of people tlp =
maturity
= stability
Le 2 avr. 2013 21:47, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com a
écrit
@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2013 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] re-visit annotation package/s
I dont fully agree even if i get you. For a bunch of people tlp =
maturity
= stability
Le 2 avr. 2013 21:47, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com a
écrit
-
From: Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2013 5:30 PM
Subject: [DISCUSS] re-visit annotation package/s
hi @ all,
we had an agreement to use a (sub-)package named annotation for all
our
hi @ all,
we had an agreement to use a (sub-)package named annotation for all our
annotations within a package.
however, it feels a bit clumsy if a package (currently) just contains
annotations.
e.g. org.apache.deltaspike.core.api.exclude only contains the package
annotation.
currently we have a
I'm happy either way. Though in the rest of Java EE, there are no
annotation packages. Perhaps we should align with the way things are laid
out in the Java EE packages.
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Gerhard Petracek
gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:
hi @ all,
we had an agreement to use a
Unfortunately even the EE specs are not in agreement whether or not to have
an annotation package.
I think we should drop the packages.
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Jason Porter lightguard...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm happy either way. Though in the rest of Java EE, there are no
annotation
] re-visit annotation package/s
hi @ all,
we had an agreement to use a (sub-)package named annotation for all
our
annotations within a package.
however, it feels a bit clumsy if a package (currently) just contains
annotations.
e.g. org.apache.deltaspike.core.api.exclude only contains
-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2013 5:30 PM
Subject: [DISCUSS] re-visit annotation package/s
hi @ all,
we had an agreement to use a (sub-)package named annotation for all
our
annotations within a package.
however, it feels a bit clumsy if a package
15 matches
Mail list logo