---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13004/#review24213
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- daan Hoogland
On July 30, 2013, 12:58 a.m.,
Cool will add it to my to do list.
On 29 July 2013 20:15, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Bah. Autocorrect. Make.
On Jul 29, 2013 3:15 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Not that I am aware of. Feel free to male it so.
On Jul 29, 2013 2:11 PM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
Hi,
Thanks Ian. I had a look at this file. It's an easy fix to remove the
check from here but it's a general utility function so will also affect
other uris... If there is no reason to limit any uri to those ports then
I'd like to remove this check and open them up.
Interested to hear opinions,
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 03:37:39PM +0900, Thomas O'Dowd wrote:
Thanks Ian. I had a look at this file. It's an easy fix to remove the
check from here but it's a general utility function so will also affect
other uris... If there is no reason to limit any uri to those ports then
I'd like to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13055/
---
Review request for cloudstack, venkata swamy babu budumuru and Prasanna
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13056/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3168
Toshaki,
As long as the enabling of features is completely in control by
cloudstack developers this model will probably work fine. If generic
code in cloudstack enables a new feature in the upgrade version of an
SDN implementation or storage provider or hypervisor, it may not. I
think we want to
+1
On 07/29/2013 11:55 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to make several changes to our by-laws, but before I continue,
I've prepared a changset that tidies up whitespace and hard wraps. This
will make it easier to edit.
The only non-whitespace change my patch makes is to correct two
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12905/
---
(Updated July 30, 2013, 8:46 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Alena
On July 29, 2013, 8:45 p.m., Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
1) DataCenterVnetDaoImpl.java
deleteRange method.
ListString vnets - this type is very ambigous. How is it represented?
100-200? 100,101,102,103? People are going to use this method, you either
have to document it well, or
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13057/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and Fang Wang.
Bugs:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12905/
---
(Updated July 30, 2013, 8:53 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Alena
Sanjeev,
I was talking to Prasanna earlier regarding testing various parts of the
S3 Object Store integration. I've been testing on and off myself using
devcloud but have yet to get a snapshot to work. It looks like devcloud
version of XCP at least doesn't have /opt/xensource/sm/ so its failing
Hi Tom,
Thanks for testing this feature on XCP. I haven't covered XCP in my tests. So
far testing has been done on XenServer and KVM.
Thanks,
Sanjeev
-Original Message-
From: Thomas O'Dowd [mailto:tpod...@cloudian.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 2:25 PM
To: Sanjeev Neelarapu
Cc:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13056/#review24218
---
Review 13056 PASSED the build test
The url of build
Hello,
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.1/domain_admin/getVMPassword.html
after retrieved the password i'm unable to decrypt the encryptedpassword.
Suggestions?
Thanks.
Regards.
--
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 12:15:33PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote:
I agree,
@Prasanna, can we make ignore default and /activate ASFBot? That would have
my preference.
I got annoyed about this today myself.
infrabot:
Prasanna Santhanam [Created] (INFRA-6605) Turn off git2jira reports coming
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13058/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Abhinandan Prateek.
Bugs: Cloudstack-2997
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13001/
---
(Updated July 30, 2013, 10:27 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13057/#review24219
---
Review 13057 PASSED the build test
The url of build
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13058/#review24220
---
Review 13058 failed the build test : FAILURE
The url of build
Hi
I filed a blocker bug
Vm deployment is failing on build CloudPlatform-4.2-292-rhel6.3.tar.gz
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3944
Can somebody fix it ASAP .
Thanks
Shweta
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13022/
---
(Updated July 30, 2013, 11:15 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
Isaac, I tried some of your changes. Looks good.
Regards,
Saksham
-Original Message-
From: Isaac Chiang [mailto:isaacchi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 3:12 PM
To: Pranav Saxena
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Git Push Summary
Hi all,
I've been working
Hi All,
Please share sql statements to be inserted in the dev list, if any db schema
changes are committed and require deploy db on existing setup .
This will save lots of development time.
More time is getting consumed in clearing the entire setup and set it again.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13060/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Sebastien Goasguen.
Repository:
Rajesh,
You can look at the check-in history for schema-410to420.sql for the changes
-Original Message-
From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 5:03 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Request to inform which DB command to run on
That's a default solution. But the rate at which commits are making to repo
it's not easy to figure out which commits are causing db changes.
Hope you had already faced this situation
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
Sent:
+1 Rajesh. Its just that its difficult to enforce all.
On 30/07/13 5:18 PM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote:
That's a default solution. But the rate at which commits are making to
repo it's not easy to figure out which commits are causing db changes.
Hope you had already faced
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13016/
---
(Updated July 30, 2013, 12:11 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Kishan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13015/#review24222
---
Commit e45888df961890af476f0f9f9b6d1c91c26cbbb6 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13057/#review24221
---
Commit 7cb1c6fa7ba229484ec3e87ad5f50b35eeacf953 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13015/#review24224
---
Commit 33122478c392a6471cf550c40d655b6f70e4701a in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13057/#review24223
---
Commit 6ec2bb1518898c55739f74a11d881b1ba587d94a in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13057/#review24226
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On July 30, 2013, 8:50 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13015/#review24225
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On July 29, 2013, 1:04 p.m.,
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:55:23PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to make several changes to our by-laws, but before I continue,
I've prepared a changset that tidies up whitespace and hard wraps. This
will make it easier to edit.
The only non-whitespace change my patch makes is to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13016/
---
(Updated July 30, 2013, 12:47 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Kishan
Ove,
Thanks for reporting this, and for the suggested fix. It appears that
the issue has existed for quite some time (if I'm understanding it
correctly), so it's great to see that we've found it now.
As for 4.1.1, we are likely to need to include the fix for 3880 as
part of a 4.1.2 or 4.2.0
On July 28, 2013, 3:59 a.m., Min Chen wrote:
server/src/com/cloud/template/HypervisorTemplateAdapter.java, line 249
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12968/diff/2/?file=329846#file329846line249
This is not right. For cross-zone template, in
Alex,
This sounds related to the changes you have been making.
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 09:46:20PM +0100, Ian Duffy wrote:
Removing the scope line from 183 of the root pom.xml also seemed to
get it going again.
On 29 July 2013 21:41, Vijayendra Bhamidipati
vijayendra.bhamidip...@citrix.com
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 08:40:44PM +, Donal Lafferty wrote:
Could you also have a look at ./client/tomcatconf/log4j-cloud.xml.in?
It looks like it was updated in the refactor.
AFAIK, in 'param name=ConversionPattern value=%-5p [%c{1.}] (%t:%x)
%m%n/', {1.} should be {1}.
See
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13061/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokharchyk, Devdeep Singh, and Ram Ganesh.
OK Thanks.
I'll try to reproduce this issue and add some details of our configuration.
Regards.
Le 26/07/2013 19:30, Musayev, Ilya a écrit :
I'm also unable to reproduce this issue in my 4.1.1 env
Screenshot for added and attached 1 root and 3 data disks
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13062/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Sebastien Goasguen.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13022/#review24228
---
Ship it!
commit 03cbf51e159a452f18f560ac64c6ae64e34df12c
- Kishan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13060/#review24229
---
Review 13060 PASSED the build test
The url of build
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13022/#review24230
---
Can upload patch for master branch?
- Kishan Kavala
On July 30,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13062/#review24231
---
Review 13062 failed the build test : FAILURE
The url of build
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12966/
---
(Updated July 30, 2013, 2:11 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Kishan
Already fixed. I neglected to test the deploydb because I had a db deployed
already. My bad.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 6:01 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Alex Huang
Subject: Re: deploydb
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13020/#review24232
---
COde changes are required in UsageManager to handle new usage event
Chip and Donal,
I should have replied to this earlier. I changed from a logging category of
[cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] to [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl].
It's shorter and really no one looks at the package any more with editors that
can open any file from any package but every
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13061/#review24233
---
Review 13061 failed the build test : FAILURE
The url of build
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13055/#review24234
---
test/integration/smoke/test_internal_lb.py
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10776/
---
(Updated July 30, 2013, 4:07 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Bugs:
BTW, how is the dependency on org.apache.commons.io.FileUtils expressed? Has
this code changed recently?
Using this morning's master, the management server can't find the FileUtils
class. I.e.
INFO [ConfigurationServerImpl] (Timer-2:null) Generated SSL keystore.
Exception in thread Timer-2
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13016/#review24244
---
Ship it!
commit a5054c1cde40eca3f6869a645331fbfd0332d398
- Kishan
Prasanna,
Based on your comment, what will happen if we remove that check and
still
NFS as secondary storage? In that case, register template is still done
through
SSVM. Any side effect? I had the same question as Tom when I was doing
object store refactoring, but hesitated to remove it
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13016/#review24243
---
Commit a5054c1cde40eca3f6869a645331fbfd0332d398 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12966/#review24248
---
Ship it!
commit 6e9bf56cf195f990cf4b37556d0f5e796de2238a
- Kishan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13065/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Abhinandan Prateek.
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10776/#review24252
---
Review 10776 PASSED the build test
The url of build
On July 28, 2013, 3:59 a.m., Min Chen wrote:
server/src/com/cloud/template/HypervisorTemplateAdapter.java, line 249
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12968/diff/2/?file=329846#file329846line249
This is not right. For cross-zone template, in
+1 (binding)
Ran it on Ubuntu in Basic mode zone with XenServers. Tested start, stop, SG.
I really dislike that we have to put in the vhdutil by hand. I keep forgetting
it. It's not a stopper though.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13072/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3872
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13065/#review24255
---
Review 13065 failed the build test : FAILURE
The url of build
Hi,
I'm having an issue with API query permissions.
I have a getEntityOwnerId() returning ACCOUNT_TYPE_NORMAL / 0 which I
believe should let all authenticated users access it.
However when I test this is not the case.
Am I missing something?
That's not the case. getEntityOwnerId() should return the actual owner of the
entity. Determination of whether someone can access an entity is in one of
the security adapters and retrieves the caller id instead.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Ian Duffy [mailto:i...@ianduffy.ie]
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13055/
---
(Updated July 30, 2013, 6:24 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, venkata
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13055/
---
(Updated July 30, 2013, 6:39 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, venkata
It's fixed.
-Original Message-
From: Shweta Agarwal [mailto:shweta.agar...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 3:53 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: blocker bug Vm deployment is failing
Hi
I filed a blocker bug
Vm deployment is failing on build
Hi List.
Is there anyway to load virtio drives by default in my guests.
When i examine the dumpxls .. virtio isn't enabled by default.
Please let me know.
Jeronimo,
Are you running Windows VMs? If so, create a template using Other PV as the
OS type.
- Si
- Original Message -
From: Jeronimo Garcia garciaj...@gmail.com
To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 1:47:29 PM
Subject: Virtio
Hi List.
Is
Virtio is selected by the OS type of the template that you launch
with. As mentioned, if you register a template with OS type of 'Other
PV', that is a blanket 'turn on virtio', regardless of the operating
system.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Simon Weller swel...@ena.com wrote:
Jeronimo,
Thanks marcus ... i just found out in the doc :) THanks!!
[image: Inline image 1]
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote:
Virtio is selected by the OS type of the template that you launch
with. As mentioned, if you register a template with OS type of 'Other
Hi everyone,
The reports are all in, you can see the latest pdf from jenkins at:
http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/docs-4.3-gsoc-guide/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/Apache_CloudStack-4.2.0-CloudStack_GSoC_Guide-en-US.pdf
Mentors and students make sure you submit your evaluations before the end
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 07:25:14PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Folks code freeze was on 7/29 and starting today we are moving ACS 42 into
limited updates in preparation for RC on 8/19. Code changes are now limited
to fixes to blocker and critical bugs only. I need to follow up on doc
The best type of commit for keeping things clean is a cherry-pick.
Merging into the release branch is messy to track as the RM.
That should be a rule for release branches after code freeze.
--Alex
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13088/
---
Review request for cloudstack, edison su and Wido den Hollander.
Bugs:
Community,
Following are the critical and blocker defects that got fixed in 4.2. Pl make
sure to review the fix / validate and close them
Reporter Total
Grand Total309
Prasanna Santhanam 28
Sanjeev N 24
Srikanteswararao Talluri24
Sangeetha
On 14.05.2013 15:41, Chip Childers wrote:
As a way to get more user feedback on our major feature releases, what
does everyone think about releasing one or two -beta releases for each
major feature release?
Hi,
What has been decided? Will we see any 4.2 betas?
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13004/#review24296
---
I looked at latest 4.2 code, toURI() only contains one line code:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13088/#review24297
---
Commit a310815aacd5c742caecc0e00cdec08182a38230 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13088/#review24299
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- edison su
On July 30, 2013, 10:18 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13088/#review24298
---
Commit 7774ecfd5ab3e2ecf1fc75634a959737a302dc79 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13088/#review24303
---
Review 13088 PASSED the build test
The url of build
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12968/#review24305
---
Commit 20831d00fb56d0553860bcb5efe47ce45bd1e74c in branch
On July 28, 2013, 3:59 a.m., Min Chen wrote:
server/src/com/cloud/template/HypervisorTemplateAdapter.java, line 249
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12968/diff/2/?file=329846#file329846line249
This is not right. For cross-zone template, in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12968/#review24307
---
Commit c2192808aa5f7a391a79fb6c84592819c032fa45 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13093/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokharchyk, Chip Childers, Kelven Yang,
On July 30, 2013, 11:13 p.m., edison su wrote:
I looked at latest 4.2 code, toURI() only contains one line code: return
new URI(scheme + :// + value.toString());, thus can't apply your patch.
Could you tell me which branch are you using? The master?
hi edison,
yes,it is in the
On July 30, 2013, 11:13 p.m., edison su wrote:
I looked at latest 4.2 code, toURI() only contains one line code: return
new URI(scheme + :// + value.toString());, thus can't apply your patch.
Could you tell me which branch are you using? The master?
Jijun wrote:
hi edison,
Permission denied on vmdata_kvm.py? How did that happen? Can you look at
the file mode on the virtual router in /opt/cloud/bin? The iso build is
supposed to set all scripts to executable, regardless of the file mode in
git. Might be worth mounting the iso and looking at cloud-scripts.tgz as
well.
On July 30, 2013, 11:13 p.m., edison su wrote:
I looked at latest 4.2 code, toURI() only contains one line code: return
new URI(scheme + :// + value.toString());, thus can't apply your patch.
Could you tell me which branch are you using? The master?
Jijun wrote:
hi edison,
OK, that's interesting. I will dig further and see what might be broken
with the cloud-scripts.tgz, as the patch was tested to work by myself,
Wido, and Prasanna. We can set it in git, but there is supposed to be a
mechanism to ensure they are all executable when packaged.
On Jul 30, 2013 7:32
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13093/#review24312
---
Review 13093 PASSED the build test
The url of build
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12905/
---
(Updated July 31, 2013, 2:46 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Alena
On July 31, 2013, 3:22 a.m., Sheng Yang wrote:
Ship It!
Looks fine to me.
- Sheng
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12972/#review24316
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12972/#review24316
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Sheng Yang
On July 31, 2013, 2:52 a.m.,
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
