CloudStack Dev,
I was emailed about some of the testing questions I brought up
over the last few threads, and a few things were pointed out to me
that I think we should try to remedy. Primarily, that the testing
environment is owned by Citrix, the QA team is primarily Citrix-run,
and the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14077/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Kelven Yang and Kishan Kavala.
Repository:
I think there are jenkins slaves that run the nicera plugins on/at Schuberg
Philis housed infrastructure. The Citrix jenkins nodes also runs as slaves
that connect back to the apache owned/controlled jenkins. No reason why
testing infra need be so consolidated, it just so happens no one is putting
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14063/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Repository:
Yes - Once your test goes into the repo, it should get picked in the subsequent
run.
Jenkins installations from various companies can be combined into a single
landing page. Jenkins itself doesn't support master/slave but it does through
the gearman plugin. It's something I have tried using
But if the test requires some sort of preconfiguration, what then (e.g.
test NFS primary storage would need a local or remote NFS configured)? do I
need to roll my own, or can I touch the existing test infra and do the
preconfigure?
On Sep 11, 2013 12:34 AM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org
If a test is meddling with the infrastructure then we have two
options:
1. isolate the test and run it separately when other tests aren't
running
2. prepare a deployment with those nfs storage preconfigured.
It can be difficult to always get the infra right for a test so tests
often will skip
On 09/11/2013 07:43 AM, Darren Shepherd wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
I think we messed up with the users again this time. Partly a fault
that we can't get beta-quality builds for users to test. Seeing
everyone run 4.2 packages after
CloudStack API actions are agnostic of underlying infrastructure and
most cases can fall into such a category as you describe. But imagine
this - I want to test snapshots ..
so i take a snapshot and verify if it backedup correctly against a
ceph object store, nfs store or iscsi store. that sort
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13877/#review26036
---
Can you resubmit the patch? I am not able to apply the patch on the
On Sep 11, 2013, at 2:57 AM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
On 09/11/2013 07:43 AM, Darren Shepherd wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
I think we messed up with the users again this time. Partly a fault
that we can't get
Hi,
after some test on 4.2 we have found some bug's in height availability
mechanisms(2 Hosts) in 4.2 on KVM hypervisor (revision 2852) on centos6.4.
The host going down and KVMInvestigator mark the host as unavailable in
right way but VM's are not going to start on another automaticaly in
Hi Donal,
I had figured out the issue why + is coming in the path value.
The root cause is while encoding the URI, we use URLEncoder.encode(path)
The encode method is converting/replace space with +.
API doc:
When encoding a String, the following rules apply:
The alphanumeric characters a
On Sep 11, 2013, at 3:02 AM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
CloudStack API actions are agnostic of underlying infrastructure and
most cases can fall into such a category as you describe. But imagine
this - I want to test snapshots ..
so i take a snapshot and verify if it
A broken master also slows down other devs. I can't remember the number
of times I've been debugging master for hours to find out something broke
it.
so how do we enforce this ?
IMO, Gerrit can be used to enforce a saner workflow, see previous
discussion at [1].
Having a workflow where
We don't want the pools to be persistent, it leads to other issues. If host
is going to be worked on (restart libvirtd or anything else), host needs to
be in maintenance.
On Sep 11, 2013 2:58 AM, Wei Zhou (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
[
This is an nfs-specific issue, i think. One thing to try maybe as a test
would be umount -l (storage pool mount) before starting guest agent after
a libvirtd restart. I still think the best route is to put the guest in
maintenance, but this should allow the NFS mount to be reregistered in
libvirt
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14079/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Saksham Srivastava and Prasanna Santhanam.
On 09/11/2013 10:06 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
On Sep 11, 2013, at 2:57 AM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
On 09/11/2013 07:43 AM, Darren Shepherd wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
I think we messed up with the users again
Check the maven dependency tree of CloudStack with and without your plugin
using 'mvn dependency:tree'. This will show the maven dependencies and
transitive dependencies. I ran in to issues like this when I had a transitive
dependency that pulled in a newer or older version of a pre-existing
Hi All,
I am in process of implementing a storage plugin and would require more
clarity on this front.
I need to update the 'Volume' as well as the 'StoragePool' in a new
implementing class of PrimaryDataStoreDriver (createAsync method to be
exact).
Should following method invocations be used
Perhaps they are a bit incorrect.
Indeed, I have found the ubuntu documentation to be poor. The RHEL are much
more reliable.
I plan to correct the docs once I have the process in place. :)
Cool. If you don't have the time to do it I can do it if you wish.
On 11 September 2013 05:54,
With no comments, I'll post this to the board today.
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.comwrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com
wrote:
I'll be working up a draft over the next couple of days. If folks have
Hi Guys,
Basically i am new to cloudstack. To have some hands on the cloudstack, its
UI; i wanted to deploy my own cloudstack. I came across Devcloud2 and i
found it really interesting. I was trying to build the devcloud2 on local
machine (windows7 using virtual box).
I have been following the
Well in the apache model committers are nominated. So basically we should
trust our committers. So I'm going to say we enforce this by having good
discipline. In really not a fan of adding more process. In communities where
gerrit is used its usually done in a model where anybody can
Hello,
I've try to upgrade my CS test platform from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0
(from Commit: e39a7d8e0d3f2fd3e326b1bdf4aaf9ba5d900b02
+ CLVM issue cherry-pick from 4.2-forward with commitId
f2c5b5fbfe45196dfad2821fca513ddd6efa25c9.)
The path 4.1.1-4.2.0 seems miss?
2013-09-11 14:32:55,619 INFO
Hi Umesh,
You have booted with normal kernel, you should boot devcloud with xen kernel
and run the cloudstack.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From: umesh kute [mailto:umeshvk...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 6:27 PM
To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
I do not find anything related in
./engine/schema/src/com/cloud/upgrade/DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java, and no
Upgrade411to420.java in ./engine/schema/src/com/cloud/upgrade/dao/ as well.
This should be a blocker issue.
2013/9/11 Milamber milam...@apache.org
Hello,
I've try to upgrade my CS test
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: 11 September 2013 05:52
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Release Criteria
To get beta quality builds we need to absolutely treat the master branch as
'stable'. Never hurt it, automate against it,
This indicates to me that this is tested already
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4509
-Original Message-
From: Wei ZHOU [mailto:ustcweiz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 7:37 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: There is no upgrade path from
Le 11/09/2013 15:36, Wei ZHOU a ecrit :
I do not find anything related in
./engine/schema/src/com/cloud/upgrade/DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java, and no
Upgrade411to420.java in ./engine/schema/src/com/cloud/upgrade/dao/ as well.
This should be a blocker issue.
Thanks for checks.
I've open an
Hey Amit,
We might have already chatted a bit about this, but feel free to examine
the SolidFire plug-in as it likely handles what you're referring to here.
Talk to you later
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Amit Das amit@cloudbyte.com wrote:
Hi All,
I am in process of implementing a
Hi Rajesh,
Thanks for spotting this problem with the Hyper-V Agent. Sounds like it should
first URL decode the field.
Can you update the review with details of your testing?
I would need to know the command and which incoming field is causing problems.
Also, can you add a serialised example
Why do we even maintain such a thing? DB migration version should not be
related to the release version. So DB just goes forward in one continuous
stream, version 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, etc.
So why do we have specific from release to release upgrades?
Additionally, there shouldn't be a big
Yeah, that would be fantastic if I could test the SolidFire plug-in in such
a way.
I could probably get away with a virtual storage node, as well, because I'm
not testing anything that requires the real hardware.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:10 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.comwrote:
On
Le 11/09/2013 15:42, Sudha Ponnaganti a ecrit :
This indicates to me that this is tested already
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4509
In CS-4509, the management log file show two db upgrade:
2013-08-26 20:56:19,257 INFO [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
On 09/11/2013 07:19 AM, Milamber wrote:
The path 4.1.1-4.2.0 seems miss?
Why do we even maintain such a thing? DB migration version should not
be related to the release version. So DB just goes forward in one
continuous stream, version 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, etc.
So why do we have
As mentioned on private, I think the reason we have so few responders when it
comes to voting - is because it takes considerable amount of time to build,
test and QA. And if you take voting serious as everyone should, you have to QA
before you can vote.
Perhaps we should spent some time on
Thanks Mike.
I referred to SolidFire's plugin implementation found some differences
with the recommendations in this email thread.
Alex's email talks about using entity interface e.g. Volume than a VO class
e.g. VolumeVO.
However, both of our plugins require a mutable object (w.r.t volume,
Ordering and dependency needs to be handled with multiple sql files not an
issue with single file.
-Soheil
From: Alex Huang [alex.hu...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 8:29 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: There is no upgrade
Why do we even maintain such a thing? DB migration version should not be
related to the release version. So DB just goes forward in one continuous
stream, version 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, etc.
I also meant to reply about this part. DB upgrade as a continuous stream is
nice in theory but
Forgot to comment, I like the idea of having smaller sql files rather than one
large file. -Soheil
From: Soheil Eizadi [seiz...@infoblox.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 9:02 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: There is no upgrade path
Thanks Alex for clearing out my confusion. I intend to modify certain
fields only.
One more query regarding the injection of cloudstack Dao vs cloudstack Mgr
classes in the plugin code base.
Should we not use Mgr classes for all the CRUD operations instead of using
the Dao classes ?
By using Mgr
I do understand that. The email I received just triggered warning bells
because it gave me the impression that the QA team as it stands isn't
testing anything that Citrix doesn't care about, regardless of what the
community has put on the support matrix. This includes even basic configs
that the
So I run ACS from eclipse for development, but DatabaseUpgradeChecker
does the following
String currentVersion =
this.getClass().getPackage().getImplementationVersion();
if (currentVersion == null) {
currentVersion =
Thanks Ron
I am planning to work on Release Notes in the morning, do you have time later
in the day or tomorrow morning PST for Installation issues.
Thanks
Animesh
-Original Message-
From: Ron Wheeler [mailto:rwhee...@artifact-software.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 5:32
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14084/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Kelven Yang and Kishan Kavala.
Repository:
Again, I'm not knocking Citrix. If anything, the issue is that they tend to
be so generous and community oriented that it surprises me when I find out
that certain donation is limited to their interests. Its perfectly
reasonable, e.g. my own donations are mostly limited to KVM.
On Sep 11, 2013
Can the generic API be
T ConfigKeyT get(String paramName, ClassT type);
Just to be a little easier to use. I know the method is discouraged, but I
do so
some places it would be useful. Besides that I like it.
The contract is simple enough that the implementation can become quite
I like it as well, especially with the number of dev on the project now. I
think by feature is a good idea. I do think there are a number of
miscellaneous updates like an index to an existing table that having its own
sql file is too much. Maybe we should define when something should be in
Hi,
I'm having a bit of trouble with the KVM SSVM.
The KVM CPVM reads as VM and Agent states Up; however, SSVM has a dash for
Agent state (its VM state is Up).
On the SSVM, I ran /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh and got back the
following message:
ERROR: Java process not running. Try
Mike, did you check the log inside the SSVM? It should print out the exception
stack trace with the reason why java process failed to start.
-alena.
From: Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.commailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
Reply-To:
Thanks, Alena
I'm not familiar with debugging SSVM. Can you tell me where the log is
located?
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
alena.prokharc...@citrix.com wrote:
Mike, did you check the log inside the SSVM? It should print out the
exception stack trace with the reason why
Maybe it's /var/log/cloud.log
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Thanks, Alena
I'm not familiar with debugging SSVM. Can you tell me where the log is
located?
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
should be in /var/log/cloud or just /var/log and look for a file called
cloud.log or cloud.out
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Thanks, Alena
I'm not familiar with debugging SSVM. Can you tell me where the log is
located?
On Wed, Sep
Same error message in the log after a rebuild of the code base (using mvn
-P developer,systemvm clean install -Dnonoss):
2013-09-11 21:10:40,929 ERROR [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) Unable
to start agent: Resource class not found:
com.cloud.storage.resource.PremiumSecondaryStorageResource
I guess something wrong with systemvm.iso
Did you build systemvm when you run mvn -P developer,systemvm clean
install ?
2013/9/11 Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
This error is repeated over and over:
2013-09-11 19:25:57,878 ERROR [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) Unable
to
Can you check whether the systemvm*.iso on your host is new or not?
2013/9/11 Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
In fact, all 26 ERROR messages in the file are the same (minus the
timestamp being a little different, of course).
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Mike Tutkowski
In fact, all 26 ERROR messages in the file are the same (minus the
timestamp being a little different, of course).
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Same error message in the log after a rebuild of the code base (using mvn
-P
Typically I build this way:
mvn -P developer,systemvm clean install -Dnonoss
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess something wrong with systemvm.iso
Did you build systemvm when you run mvn -P developer,systemvm clean
install ?
2013/9/11 Mike
I am rebuilding using mvn -P developer,systemvm clean install -Dnonoss
right now.
Once this has completed, I can destroy my system VMs and let them be
re-deployed and see if that fixes the issue.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Typically I
Thanks for the offer, Ian! :)
I should be able to update the docs after I jot down the process in the
next week or so, but thanks!
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
Perhaps they are a bit incorrect.
Indeed, I have found the ubuntu documentation to be poor.
Sorry if these are really basic questions about how system VMs work:
1) Is systemvm.iso used for system VMs of all different hypervisor types?
2) Does a system VM access systemvm.iso via a virtual CD/DVD drive?
3) Is systemvm.iso downloaded to each hypervisor host from the management
server (I
Looks like there are three that were built a little while ago (around the
time I was building the codebase). 44,621,824 bytes each.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you check whether the systemvm*.iso on your host is new or not?
2013/9/11 Mike
And they've been installed with the agent? Via .deb files or what? You
should be able to look at the .deb packages you generated and verify the
systemvm.iso that is mounted to your ssvm is the same md5sum as the one in
the .deb you installed. virsh dumpxml (vmname) will give you the VM
This error is repeated over and over:
2013-09-11 19:25:57,878 ERROR [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) Unable
to start agent: Resource class not found:
com.cloud.storage.resource.PremiumSecondaryStorageResource due to:
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
It could work if you scp/cp the new systemvm.iso to
/usr/share/cloudstack-common/vms/systemvm.iso on KVM host.
2013/9/12 Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
So, actually, what Marcus brings up is related to one of my earlier
questions about how system VM's work.
I rebuilt the
Yes, exactly. Hence my comments on other threads about preferring to just
build packages and reinstall when doing KVM development rather than copying
jars around, its the best way to ensure the agent/host get all of the fresh
code.
Your secondary storage should be fine. I run everything on one
It should be in the common package.
On Sep 11, 2013 4:06 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
So, actually, what Marcus brings up is related to one of my earlier
questions about how system VM's work.
I rebuilt the codebase about an hour ago, but did not re-deploy the .deb
I restarted Ubuntu to make sure everything was fresh, destroyed, and
re-created my system VMs.
I got an error message from Ubuntu about a failed process (it's related to
the agent).
I'll put a screen shot on the web and provide a link in a moment.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Mike
Is it going to be a problem that my KVM host is doubling as my secondary
storage server?
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote:
And they've been installed with the agent? Via .deb files or what? You
should be able to look at the .deb packages you generated
it should be a bug. try after changing domain to vmName in line 934
2013/9/12 Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
hostname --domain comes back empty...Is this the problem? If so, how might
I solve this? Thanks
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Mike Tutkowski
./scripts/vm/network/security_group.py
2013/9/12 Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com
it should be a bug. try after changing domain to vmName in line 934
2013/9/12 Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
hostname --domain comes back empty...Is this the problem? If so, how might
I solve
That looks like the python script might be trying to talk to libvirtd.
Remember, domain also refers to a VM. I have no idea, just that 'conn'
usually refers to a libvirtd connection. Didn't know security groups py did
that. I usually deal in advanced zones without security groups though.
On Sep
So, actually, what Marcus brings up is related to one of my earlier
questions about how system VM's work.
I rebuilt the codebase about an hour ago, but did not re-deploy the .deb
files.
It sounds like the systemvm.iso file is part of the .deb packaging (I
wasn't sure if it was or if it was later
Interesting...no error message from Ubuntu this time (with the script
updated), but still no state shown in the GUI for SSVM (after destroying
and letting it be re-created).
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
I made that change and am just
Animesh,
I have not checked on this myself.
I believe that you have not yet promoted the bits from dist/dev to
dist/release. If that's the case, we CAN fix this with a re-spin. Not
being able to upgrade from the 4.1.1 release is a MAJOR ISSUE, since we had
a security vulnerability announcement
Cloudstack.org isn't resolving.
Cloudstack.apache.org is up and running.
Do we need to get a hold of infrastructure?
Matt Mullins
Cloud Platforms Implementation Engineer
Worldwide Cloud Services – Citrix System, Inc.
+1 (407) 920-1107 – Office/Cell Phone
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 5:54 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Animesh Chaturvedi
Subject: Re: There is no upgrade path from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0
Animesh,
I have not checked on this myself.
I believe that you have not yet promoted
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13897/#review26045
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Min Chen
On Aug. 29, 2013, 12:17 p.m.,
I have set up a GTM with Ron tomorrow 10 AM PST. Anyone else interested is
welcome to join, GTM details are provided below
1. Please join my meeting.
https://www1.gotomeeting.com/join/725491376
2. Use your microphone and speakers (VoIP) - a headset is recommended. Or,
call in using your
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13897/#review26046
---
committed to 4.2-forward and master.
- Min Chen
On Aug. 29,
The ASF has taken charge of the domains, but I suspect DNS is lagging a bit.
--David
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Mathias Mullins
mathias.mull...@citrix.com wrote:
Cloudstack.org isn't resolving.
Cloudstack.apache.org is up and running.
Do we need to get a hold of infrastructure?
Matt
Well in the apache model committers are nominated. So basically we should
trust our committers. So I'm going to say we enforce this by having good
discipline. In really not a fan of adding more process. In communities where
gerrit is used its usually done in a model where anybody can
Hmmm... well shoot. If what I'm saying is an argument for gerrit, then I
take it back. I don't like heavy processes. Keep it simple, work with
good people.
Darren
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:
Well in the apache model committers are nominated.
A broken master also slows down other devs. I can't remember the
number of times I've been debugging master for hours to find out something
broke it.
so how do we enforce this ?
I'm so glad we raise this point. For some time now, Prasanna, Amogh, Frank,
and a number of others have
As Sebastien said, it's easy to get you the credentials for jenkins.
Anyone with commit rights can request for an account. In fact one is
created soon as you commit. I just need to adjust the credentials.
(We'll move to git based job configurations but later)
Citrix is unable to test various
So, do we feel there are at least two bugs here that I should create JIRA
tickets for?
1)
2013-09-11 19:25:57,878 ERROR [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) Unable
to start agent: Resource class not found: com.cloud.storage.resource.
PremiumSecondaryStorageResource due to:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13900/#review26048
---
Committed to 4.2-forward and master.
- Min Chen
On Aug. 29,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13900/#review26047
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Min Chen
On Aug. 29, 2013, 12:20 p.m.,
I think the premium class refers to oss vs non oss builds. Before you
file a bug, maybe try with some known good release artifacts that someone
else has built to maybe see if its a config or build issue. If the
artifacts work it will at least narrow it down. In fact that might be a
good idea in
On Aug. 12, 2013, 9:52 a.m., Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
Ship It!
The patch fails, due to image content.
Ian,
This is a old patch, now that you are a committer I assume that these are
already updated.
Do mark this as closed.
- Abhinandan
Yeah, 4.1.1 or 4.2 RC maybe. I was just thinking we have no way to
know if the debs you generated are missing something. I think I have
seen that Premium class missing once before due to not building in
vmware support or something, and it turned out to be oss vs non-oss
builds.
On Wed, Sep 11,
I find for most of the VPC tests we create a new VPC Offering which provides
almost the same set of services as the Default VPC Offering already available
by default. We also have a separate function to create this offering, enabling
it and then create a VPC using this offering. I wonder why do
I think the test infra as described is great, but I think we're
hurting a little more for basics. For example, we don't need a full
infrastructure with hardware to ensure that the support matrix works.
I could bring up a VM with CentOS and one with Ubuntu, and test NFS,
CLVM, and RBD on each. CLVM
Since the 4.2 code isn't yet available from a pre-built source on the web,
maybe I should do 4.1.1.
Otherwise I'd have to build the 4.2 .debs and we'd be subject to the same
possible build errors.
Unless the 4.2 ones are available on the web.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Marcus Sorensen
Yeah, I would love to get a SolidFire test suite up and running and plugged
into the main builds.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote:
I think the test infra as described is great, but I think we're
hurting a little more for basics. For example, we don't
Agree with Marcus, it could because of the different ./client/tomcatconf/
nonossComponentContext.xml.in and ./client/tomcatconf/
componentContext.xml.in
Mike, could you try mvn -P developer,systemvm clean install instead?
2013/9/12 Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
Since the 4.2
The Premium comes from this part in ./client/tomcatconf/nonossComp
onentContext.xml http://nonosscomponentcontext.xml.in/
bean id=configurationDaoImpl
class=com.cloud.configuration.dao.ConfigurationDaoImpl
property name=configParams
map
entry key=premium value=true /
I guess I was unaware that the test infrastructure tests various
deployment configs from the ground up, rebuilding from baremetal (I
guess?). I was initially thinking We already test KVM, let me just
run two commands on the host to set up a volume group, then tweak the
marvin test to register it
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
