e programmer was running out of places to write code
>
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 6:25 PM, Daan Hoogland
> wrote:
>
> > All, I am having second thoughts. I think we should maintain a wrapper
> for
> > string utils and pass through as much as possible to commons string
>
and remove them if you can get
> that done in a single effort.
>
> Just a technical question: Could one not just add the Warning to the
> constructor?
> Might have to create a null (log warning only) constructor.
>
> Ron
>
>
> On 10/01/2018 3:58 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
ing as well as at run-time.
>
> Ron
>
> On 10/01/2018 3:34 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> Ron, we could but that would only log during compile-time, not on runtime.
> I am doing some analysis and commenting in Wido's ticket.
>
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 9:23 PM, Ron Wh
>
> On 10/01/2018 2:26 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
>> I think we could start with giving it an explicit non standard name like
>> CloudStackLocalStringUtils or something a little shorter. Making sure that
>> we prefer for these types of utils to be imported from other
ging fruit as some methods in StringUtils
> are not used or are very easy to replace.
>
>
> Wido
>
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Wido den Hollander
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On 01/10/2018 12:01 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>>>
>>>
I hope we understand each other correctly: No-one running an earlier
version then 4.11 should miss out on any functionality they are using now.
So if you use ipv6 and multiple cidrs now it must continue to work with no
loss of functionality. see my question below.
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 7:06 PM,
gt;>>
>>> Wido - are you seeing (upgrade) failure, or something fails to work
>>> without this fix in basic zone?
>>>
>>> From: Daan Hoogland
>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 10:50:22 PM
>>> To: dev
t; All,
>>>>> Thank you everyone for your feedback. Given we're in agreement with
>>>>>
>>>> Daan's proposal, I'll summarize and add strategy:
>>>
>>>> - We'll freeze the 4.11 milestone to only these 9 PRs:
>>>&g
I'd say remove as much functionality as we can from 'our' StringUtils and
phase them out asap.
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:59 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have com.cloud.utils.StringUtils which has a few nice functions, but
> throughout the code I also see org.apache.commons.lang.St
just anonymously removed it, Giles
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 11:21 AM, Giles Sirett
wrote:
> Somebody has made an edit to the cloudstack wikipedia entry
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=819108440&oldid=815849996
>
> In essence, they have changed the start of the history section to give
uthor(s)?
> >
> >
> > I do not have problems with the first type of merge commits. However, I
> > think we should not allow the second type to get into our code base.
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:45 AM, Daan Hoogland
> > wrote
my colleague already
> >
> > 2018-01-08 12:06 GMT+02:00 Daan Hoogland :
> >
> >> yeah, way ahead of you Igor ;) I asked a question about it
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Voloshanenko Igor <
> >> igor.voloshane...@gmail.com> w
Voloshanenko Igor >:
>
> > Sure. Got it.
> >
> > Will post update soon
> >
> > 2018-01-08 11:38 GMT+02:00 Daan Hoogland :
> >
> >> Igor, I remember your PR and think it is fine. It can also be argued
> that
> >> it needs to go in as a secu
Devs,
I see a lot of merge master to branch commits appearing on PRs. This is
against prior (non-hard) agreements on how we work. It is getting to be the
daily practice so;
How do we feel about
1. not using merge commits anymore?
2. merging back as a way of solving conflicts?
and
Do we need to mak
2018-01-08 11:15 GMT+02:00 Boris Stoyanov :
>
> > +1 Daan
> >
> >
> > boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com
> > www.shapeblue.com
> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> > @shapeblue
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 8 Jan 2018, a
Rohit, Ivan,
I think we can argue that the five open PRs on the milestone can still go
in as long as active work on them continues. I have not looked at Ivan's
PRs yet but can see they were entered in december and he is actively
working on it so why not include those in the milestone. A bigger con
://cloudstack.apache.org>
>
>
>
> ____
> From: Daan Hoogland
> Sent: Wednesday, January 3, 2018 7:17:04 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: test file sticking around
>
> devs,
>
> This has been bugging me but not enough to tackle: a file named
>
devs,
This has been bugging me but not enough to tackle: a file named
'services/secondary-storage/server/testfile' is created during the build
and I think it is created in
NfsSecondaryStorageResourceTest.testSwiftWriteMetadataFile(). I want to
solve this with an @After method. Any reason not to? l
0
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 1:51 PM, Gabriel Beims Bräscher wrote:
> +1
>
> 2018-01-02 9:46 GMT-02:00 Rafael Weingärtner >:
>
> > Hope you guys had great holy days!
> >
> > Resuming the discussion we started last year in [1]. It is time to vote
> and
> > then to push (if the vote is successful) th
thanks Ron,
Not planning any long train rides but this is worth one ;)
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Ron Wheeler <
rwhee...@artifact-software.com> wrote:
> For those who are interested in process.
>
> This is an interesting summary of "Best Practices" for teamwork on
> software projects.
>
>
like the idea Ivan, I hope it won't be enforced though, and just a help.
Coders are notorious for using spelling to distinguish between instances.
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Rafael Weingärtner <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Rohit Yadav
> wr
) business days after the notification email is
> sent;
> >8. After the branch removal, the Jira ticket must be closed.
> >
> >
> > I will wait more two days. If we do not get comments here anymore, I
> will
> > call for a vote, and then if there are no objec
Are you proposing to add zookeeper as an optional requirement, Marc-Aurèle?
or just curator? and what is the decision mech of including it or not?
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Marc-Aurèle Brothier
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I was wondering how many of you are running CloudStack with a cluster
sounds lime a lazy consensus vote; +1 from me
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Rafael Weingärtner <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Khosrow has done a great job here, but we still need to move this forward
> and create a standard/guidelines on how to use the official repo. Looking
also I think we can tolerate collective work on our repo. Not everything
has to go on forks.
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> Rafael, I don't think that works. the versions in the pom.xml files are
> updated to non snapshot versions on per release mini branc
ntributors/committers. These branches can be at their own
> personal forks.
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Daan Hoogland
> wrote:
>
> > thanks for that list Khosrow, Also very usefull for cleaning people to
> > clean their own fork.
> > I think you can start wit
thanks for that list Khosrow, Also very usefull for cleaning people to
clean their own fork.
I think you can start with the lowest pom versions but I changed one
because the referred ticket isn't closed. It's my own and I'll have a look
later today. For a lot of the branches the ticket aren't clea
nice to virtually meet you again, Ernie. have fun
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Nux! wrote:
> Welcome Ernie :>
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Rohit Yadav"
> > To: "dev"
> > Sent: Thursday, 30 No
Ivan, don't do two sets of fixes. We will forwarfd merge from the 4.10
branch to master
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Ivan Kudryavtsev wrote:
> Hi, Paul.
>
> All my fixes to 4.10 are in pr:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2320
>
> I think it should be organized somehow with PR pe
welcome Gabriel, go get'm
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Marc-Aurèle Brothier - Exoscale <
ma...@exoscale.ch> wrote:
> Welcome Gabriel & congrats!
>
> Marc-Aurèle
>
> On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 08:32 -0200, Rafael Weingärtner wrote:
> > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack ha
Re: jetty simulator problem
>
> It works without removing annotation because they are not being processed
> (@component). That is why when you deleted the beans declaration in the XML
> Spring started complaining about those beans. So, if they are not being
> used, we can simply remove them
version of the
> dependencies changed?
>
don't know, i haven't found any yet (looking at CLOUDSTACK-10012 tagged
commits)
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Daan Hoogland
> wrote:
>
> > it actually already works with only the depends-on attributes in the xml
>
, everything started working. I committed these changes at
> https://github.com/rafaelweingartner/cloudstack/tree/daanTestSimulator
>
> Could you test it? If it works I can open a PR.
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Daan Hoogland
> wrote:
>
> > trying with only the depe
trying with only the depends-on lines removed now
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> from maven:
> mvn -pl client jetty:run -Dsimulator
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 8:16 PM, Rafael Weingärtner <
> rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The err
;
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Daan Hoogland
> wrote:
>
> > didn't work:( trying with only some parts removed now
> >
> > Caused by: org.springframework.beans.factory.
> > NoSuchBeanDefinitionException:
> > No qualifying bean of type
> >
on properly. The configuration
> "depends-on" you find in the XML "bean" element is to define an exotic and
> not obvious dependency.
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Daan Hoogland
> wrote:
>
> > I'm looking at a problem, any one reco
3 of course ;)
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Rene Moser wrote:
> Hi Devs
>
> The last days I fought with the ACL egress rule behaviour and I would
> like to make a poll in which direction the fix should go.
>
> Short Version:
>
> We need to define a better default behaviour for acl default eg
I'm looking at a problem, any one recognises this on master? simulator does
not start cleanly.
[WARNING] Failed startup of context o.e.j.m.p.JettyWebAppContext@51de5efa
{/client,file:/Users/dahn/apache/cloudstack/client/target/classes/META-INF/webapp/,STARTING}{file:/Users/dahn/apache/cloudstack/c
Hey Ivan, I am not very familiar to that survey. Is it mail based and where
did you sent it? If not can you do me a link? I don't think it is intended
to be ignored.
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 4:51 AM, Ivan Kudryavtsev
wrote:
> Hi, DevTeam.
>
> May be dev@ is wrong list, sorry in advance.
>
> It se
he
VR.
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Ciobanu Cristian
wrote:
> Daan,
>
> Can I track this issue somewhere?
>
>
> Thank you!
> Cristian
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 201
Mike, i created https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2296 after
investigation. haven't tested it yet.
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> Mike, absolutely right and I would usually just say "okay revert" but in
> this case I want to look to fix fo
Mike, absolutely right and I would usually just say "okay revert" but in
this case I want to look to fix forward. This commit is an attempt to make
network types more pluggable. So let me see if I can find a solution. I had
trusted on the smoke tests to pick this up.
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:50
devs,
The console proxy has its own logger, which is actually a wrapper around
log4j. Is there a compelling reason to keep it?
Background: We are using log4j sl4j and this wrapper in our code base but
as log4j2 is the de-facto standard I would like to unify them all and
upgrade.
tnx
--
Daan
, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Imran Ahmed wrote:
> Hi Daan,
> I would be happy for contributing my part. Please guide me about the
> procedures.
> Regards,
>
> Imran
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 1
users and devs,
Sorry for the cross post.
Is there any devops guru that wishes to take on the 4.11 release, with
assistence of course?
--
Daan
Good going and clear trail Syed
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Rafael Weingärtner <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Congratulation Syed, and thanks for the hard work you have put into ACS so
> far.
>
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Rohit Yadav
> wrote:
>
> > Congratulations Syed!
> >
>
ohw dear Mike, I am changing the log4j version, brr.
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Tutkowski, Mike
wrote:
> I wonder if it wouldn’t be best to wait on this until master is in code
> freeze. At that point, it seems like we could add whatever rules we’d like
> and have almost no impact on p
I am a fan of convention and think everyone should have some. Strict
enforcing of non-functionals, I'm not to big on. I see what you want to
achieve here but am reluctant not to -1 any strictness. If we do it with a
post-commit-hook (or if such a thing exists a post-merge-hook) we will
allow for co
+1 Sigert, be my guest. We will run integration tests on your changes anyway,
so low risk ;)
On 2017/09/26 15:55, "Rafael Weingärtner" wrote:
IMO, if something is not used or if something does not work, it has to
be removed or fixed.
I am +1 for the removal of unused constants
People,
I am trying to up log4j to log4j2:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10089
A discussion earlier led to the question if we should use sl4j, but my answer
is no, because ACS uses to advanced features at some places and log4j-2 leaves
you the choice to install a proxy for sl
congrats guys, go get'm
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Milamber wrote:
>
> Congrats Nathan & Marc-Aurèle!
>
> On 22/09/2017 17:31, Rafael Weingärtner wrote:
>
>> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has invited
>> Nathan Johnson and Marc-Aurèle Brothier to become commit
ck). There can
be multiple case scenarios but I am mentioning the most generic one .
Hope that answers your question if I have correctly understood your
question.
Regards,
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@sha
Devs and users,
Can you all please tell me how you are using VxLan in your cloudstack
environments?
The reason behind this is that I am planning some refactoring in the
networkgurus and I don’t want to break any running installations on upgrade. If
you are not using vxlan but know of people th
devs,
there is a field is_system in the user_ip_address. I see no instance
of it that is not 0 in my envs. I am looking to implement some ip
reservation for systemVMs. it seems this field is applicable or even
intended for this purpose.
Anyone that has some advice on this?
tnx
--
Daan
Looking forward to this but I will only be available the first half hour for
this.
On 19/07/2017, 20:58, "ilya" wrote:
Hi Devs and Users
Hope this message finds you well,
As mentioned earlier, we would like to start with quarterly calls to
discuss the direction of clou
How about using one of the older announcements as draft, Rajani? That is how I
did it in the past.
On 19/07/2017, 08:11, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote:
api changes and fixed issues are available at
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/30
Pierre-Luc is helping on upgrade
yes, see ParamProcessWorker for the handling
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Pavan Kumar Aravapalli
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found some of the api parameters annotated with @ACL in source code.
> Is this feature enabled ? In ACS , if so provide me some information on how
> it implemented and
tarter/noob" level? (just some easy issue I could have a look to discover
the code)
Thanks!
Cheers
Olivier
daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
On 11 July 2017 at 00:56, Daan Hoogland wr
John,
too bad but that indeed means it isn’t running. You can double check with
# service cloudstack-usage status
cloudstack-usage is stopped
and if need be
# service cloudstack-usage start
Starting CloudStack Usage Monitor cloudstack-usage [ OK ]
I am not running the con
Ok, then it isn’t installed but that it can.
# yum install cloudstack-usageit makes sense to look at the docker definition
and do it there
On 12/07/17 09:07, "John McDonnell" wrote:
Hi,
Any idea how to start it when running in the Docker simulator?
Obviously the service t
maybe a double post due to mail issues:
Ok, then it isn’t installed but that it can.
# yum install cloudstack-usage
assuming centos as base. It makes sense to look at the docker
definition and do it there
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:07 AM, John McDonnell
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any idea how to start it w
https://builds.cloudstack.org/view/release/job/build-systemvm is configured to
push the systemvm for a version taken from a parameter
On 12/07/17 08:45, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote:
AFAIK, there is no job that automatically pushes templates. I
manually copied the templates from build
ht
Thanks Rajani,
I created the upgrade paths and am no test compiling. Expect a PR in the next
hour (I added the new path to every version not just past 4.0)
On 12/07/17 08:41, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote:
I made the pom changes on master to 4.11.0.0-SNAPSHOT
4.10 branch is created
Monsieur,
The job should be altered to go into 4.11. lemme look.
On 12/07/17 02:06, "Pierre-Luc Dion" wrote:
Hi,
I've created new jenkins jobs [1] to create package for our release, The
jobs pushed rpm's but for systemvm, look like there is a wget job somewhere
that downloa
*
> CTO
>
> <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK>
>
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Daan Hoogland
> wrote:
>
>> No I am creating the upgrade code for the next version.
>> (schema-41000to41100 and upgrade java class)
>>
>> On 11/07/17 15:29, "williamste
re are you working?
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/tree/master/source/upgrade
*Will Stevens*
CTO
<https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK>
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> Devs,
>
> I am busy creating the skel
Devs,
I am busy creating the skeleton upgrade code for our next version (working name
4.11). Are we still supporting all direct upgrades from 2.x onward or should we
only assume upgrade paths from 4.y onwards?
Tnx,
daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden,
>
>> On 10 Jul 2017, at 16:10, Ron Wheeler
> wrote:
>>
>> Alex,
>> Do you have a CLA on file with Apache.
>> You should have one to contribute to the wiki.
>>
>> Ron
>>
>>> On 10/07/2017 10:42 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>>> create y
the wiki.
>
> Ron
>
> On 10/07/2017 10:42 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>>
>> create your account on cwiki and we can give you access
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 12:10 AM, Alex Hitchins
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Please let me know if there is anyth
Oliver, I am pretty sure you where having a mysql version error at
first. This one is new to me. Did you fully remove mysql and the cloud
database and then install mariadb? Maybe you can drop all tables and
run the mvn command for installing a db instead of the create db
script. just for checking
re we still on JDK 6 for
>> example?
>>
>> More than happy to amend Confluence with updates as I come across them.
>>
>>
>> Alexander Hitchins
>> ----
>> E: a...@alexhitchins.com
>> W: alexhitchins.com
>> M: 0778
Why do you ask, Alex? Is something not working?
Biligual auto correct use. Read at your own risico
On 7 Jul 2017 9:54 pm, "Alex Hitchins" wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> I note this was last amended 2013, is there a better/more recent resource
> for the aspiring CloudStack developer?
>
>
>
> https
we need another binding vote and I know Boris way of working. I don't
have time to test myself but given Boris vote I
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Boris Stoyanov
wrote:
> +1
>
> I’ve did upgrade testing with VMWare 5.5u3, advanced zone running on CentOS
> 6.8 from:
> 4.5 -> 4.10
Btw, I use mariadb 10.2.6 installed with brew
On 06/07/2017, 09:27, "Daan Hoogland" wrote:
H Oliver, your mysql seems to new for cloudstack ;) and welcome back
On 06/07/2017, 09:02, "Olivier Lamy" wrote:
Hi,
Long time I didn't part
H Oliver, your mysql seems to new for cloudstack ;) and welcome back
On 06/07/2017, 09:02, "Olivier Lamy" wrote:
Hi,
Long time I didn't participate here.
I'd like to do some hacking.
I'm not clear on the process for noob :-)
I ran sql scripts:
* create-database.sql
*
For the interested: This is the behaviour on macos 10.12 with mysql
5.6. Downgrading mysql solves the problem
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> Has anybody outthere seen a
> mvn – P developer –pl developer –Ddeploydb
> report success without executing any sql comma
Has anybody outthere seen a
mvn – P developer –pl developer –Ddeploydb
report success without executing any sql commands?
No create schema is not even executed.
daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Paul Angus wrote:
> + Release notes will be impossible to create without a proper Jira history.
> And no one will know what has gone into CloudStack.
No they are not mr Grumpy. they should be base on the code anyway,
hence on git, not jira. I do not appose to th
o focus more on the new branch rather than on
>> testing the RC
>> and releasing it).
>>
>> I believe we should do the following: As we approach the first
>> RC, we need
>> to limit the number of PRs going into the branch (in order to
>> stabilize
>
It was an optimization that got merged and if someone is hindered we should
back out and proceed, I’d say.
On 21/06/17 16:00, "Wido den Hollander" wrote:
> Op 20 juni 2017 om 21:35 schreef Kris Sterckx
:
>
>
> I am sorry, I need to vote -1
:(
Anybody e
this is why i say we should branch on first RC, fix in release branch
only and merge forward
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Will Stevens wrote:
> I know it is hard to justify not merging PRs that seem ready but are not
> blockers in an RC, but it is a vicious circle which ultimately results in
The wiki page exists for changes to be introduced at 5.0. It has been there for
more than a year so it needs tlc.
As for the API I sugest to start with a v2Beta api that we then migrate to v2
once we feel it can be maintained for a while without breaking backwards
compatibility. (and move to ACS
At the moment I am looking at CAMP, used by Apache Brooklyn, to see if it makes
sense to embed a Brooklyn engine in ACS. There is an extension to Brooklyn for
TOSCA for comparison but I’d like to keep it as simple as possible and hence
use CAMP. (as you know Rafael ;)
On 29/05/2017, 23:17, "Raf
ce by piece
of the complete feature), then the draft of a proposal, and later define the
implementation job, so people of the community can embrace it.
>
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Daan Hoogland
> wrote:
>
> > Great thanks
Great thanks Simon,
Just want to play bingo a bit; dividing the VR into VNFs (virtual network
functions) was mentioned. This pertains to the mention of making the VR more
modular ;)
Hopefully everybody is inspired by this because no one company or person is
going to make this happen.
Dahn
On
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 4:37 PM, sachin patil wrote:
>
>> > >> According to the link you told me to enter in acs.list in source.d
>> > >> folder. Cloudstack-agent 4.9.2 is installed. I build CS management
>> from
>> > >> code 4.10.0.0 snapshot.
You better have a look at this. Does the agent
Sachin, this seems more a code version issue to me than an environment issue.
SetHostParamsCommand is not recognised as a command. Could you try this on 4.9
branch and see if you have the same issue?
You also might want to look at the versions of gson. And if there is a jar for
that preinstalle
John, I never implemented one but I am about to investigate the ovm3 one to see
if I can maintain it for a customer. I know the guy that wrote it and he says
it’s fairly simple given the constraint of a hypervisor plugin, so I’d have a
look at that one if I where you.
Important thing to conside
Good initiative, looks nice.
On 11/05/17 16:53, "Syed Ahmed" wrote:
Hi All,
I want to propose a new plugin in Cloudstack to enable Baremetal
provisioning using MaaS by Canonical. This will enable a lot of interesting
features some of which are
1. Advanced networking
As far as I remember only 4.4 and the commercial 3.x series were releases that
way.
On 09/05/17 08:25, "Erik Weber" wrote:
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> LS,
>
> In a lot of occasions, we have seen new features that are waiting
~ Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
On May 8, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Daan Hoogland
(daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com) wrote:
LS,
In a lot of occasions, we have seen new features that are
waiting for releases with blocker bugs and while these bugs
certainly
LS,
In a lot of occasions, we have seen new features that are waiting for releases
with blocker bugs and while these bugs certainly must be solved, users that are
not hindered by those bugs directly are stopped by them. Therefore, I propose
we will fork on the first RC branches for future relea
ntries for that POD are send to the VR.
Wido
> Op 4 mei 2017 om 12:12 schreef Wido den Hollander :
> > Op 4 mei 2017 om 11:11 schreef Wei ZHOU :
> > > 2017-05-04 10:48 GMT+02:00 Wido den Hollander :
> > > > Op 3 mei 2017 om 14:49 schreef Daan Hooglan
Have fun Sachin,
May you come up with the most flexible, extensible, pluggable, configurable
addition to our project ever ;)
daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
On 05/05/17 17:49, "sachin patil" wrote:
Hello a
Happy to pick this up, Remi. I'm travelling now but will look at both on
Friday.
Biligual auto correct use. Read at your own risico
On 3 May 2017 2:25 pm, "Remi Bergsma" wrote:
> Always happy to share, but I won’t have time to work on porting this to
> CloudStack any time soon.
>
> Regards, Re
Sorry to poop the party late but I am really opposed to commits@clo… To me this
one is only for commits on potential release branches not for all the work in
progress. I’d rather see either a separate list or people subscribing
themselves to PRs on github.
I do agree the dev@ is polluted and co
I rebased that last one. I don’t think this is still a blocker.
On 19/04/17 12:39, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote:
CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
http://download.cloud.com
Thanks,
~Rajani
daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Ga
Paul if we put effort in automation we should do so using the review
functionality of github, where you can approve a PR
On 16/04/17 09:45, "Paul Angus" wrote:
That’s in progress...
It would be cool if we could parse comments for LGTM and OK to Merge so
that we can have them as status
more use cases then
just for CA-plugins (fantasy running now)
On 14/04/17 16:57, "Simon Weller" wrote:
Daan,
What about integrating some like Vault (https://github.com/hashicorp/vault)?
- Si
From: Daa
Devs,
Following a discussion with a client they came up with the idea to create a
pluggable CA-framework. A plugin would serve components in cloudstack that so
require (management servers, agents, load balancers, SVMs, etc.) with
certificates answering certificate requests and validating certif
401 - 500 of 3867 matches
Mail list logo
