tomorrow?
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 01:01:59PM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
-Original Message-
From: nicolas.lamira...@orange.com [mailto:nicolas.lamira...@orange.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 7:30 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being
:
-Original Message-
From: nicolas.lamira...@orange.com [mailto:nicolas.lamira...@orange.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 7:30 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2
Hi
We didn't so much choose
]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 7:30 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2
Hi
We didn't so much choose the Security Groups feature as we found that the
VLAN option, which is the only other option available in 2.2.13, wouldn't
] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2
Hi
We didn't so much choose the Security Groups feature as we found that the
VLAN option, which is the only other option available in 2.2.13, wouldn't let
us achieve what we had in mind in terms of Network Architecture.
This was more of a default
[mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 1:02 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2
-Original Message-
From: nicolas.lamira...@orange.com
[mailto:nicolas.lamira...@orange.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 06:08:52PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Alena and I discussed with folks at Orange, their use-case can be supported
in AdvancedZone without SecurityGroup by creating account specific guest
network. Alena will look at their database to help them migrate the db
Well
On May 22, 2013, at 2:11 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 06:08:52PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Alena and I discussed with folks at Orange, their use-case can be supported
in AdvancedZone without SecurityGroup by creating account specific guest
On 5/22/13 11:11 AM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 06:08:52PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Alena and I discussed with folks at Orange, their use-case can be
supported in AdvancedZone without SecurityGroup by creating account
specific guest network.
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 07:26:06PM +, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
On 5/22/13 11:11 AM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 06:08:52PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Alena and I discussed with folks at Orange, their use-case can be
supported in
AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: 'Chip Childers'; Wei Zhou (w.z...@leaseweb.com)
Subject: Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1
vs 4.2
On May 17, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
So I am confused looks like Nicolas
@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: 'Chip Childers'; Wei Zhou (w.z...@leaseweb.com)
Subject: Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1
vs 4.2
On May 17, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
So I am confused looks like Nicolas was not using this feature
-Original Message-
From: nicolas.lamira...@orange.com [mailto:nicolas.lamira...@orange.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 7:30 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2
Hi
We didn't so much choose the Security Groups
...@orange.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 7:30 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2
Hi
We didn't so much choose the Security Groups feature as we found that the
VLAN option, which is the only other option available
@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: 'Chip Childers'; Wei Zhou (w.z...@leaseweb.com)
Subject: Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2
On May 17, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
So I am confused looks like Nicolas was not using
: 'Chip Childers'; Wei Zhou (w.z...@leaseweb.com)
Subject: Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2
On May 17, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
So I am confused looks like Nicolas was not using this feature
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 11:47 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: 'Chip Childers'; Wei Zhou (w.z...@leaseweb.com)
Subject: Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1
vs 4.2
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 12:36 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 03:32:50PM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote
CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1
vs 4.2
On May 17, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
So I am confused looks like Nicolas was not using this feature as
it was not
supported for Vmware any way so how is upgrade blocked?
Animesh
@cloudstack.apache.org; Wei Zhou
(w.z...@leaseweb.com)
Subject: RE: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2
I'm afraid it might introduce extra effort to allow them to use SG again if
they
manage to upgrade to 4.1.
I already checked in the patch in 4-2-advanced-zone-security-group from
To: 'Chip Childers'; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Wei Zhou
(w.z...@leaseweb.com)
Subject: RE: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2
I'm afraid it might introduce extra effort to allow them to use SG again if
they
manage to upgrade to 4.1.
I already checked in the patch in 4
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 11:47 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: 'Chip Childers'; Wei Zhou (w.z...@leaseweb.com)
Subject: Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2
On May 17, 2013
)
Subject: Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2
On May 17, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
So I am confused looks like Nicolas was not using this feature as it was not
supported for Vmware any way so how is upgrade blocked
on a
previous release.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Wei ZHOU [mailto:ustcweiz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 8:28 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2
Half of our platforms are on 2.2.14 (advanced
Le 16/05/2013 15:56, Chip Childers a écrit :
If we were able to upgrade you correctly to 4.1, but security groups were not
yet
functional, would that suffice?
yes.
--
Nicolas Lamirault
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 03:59:06PM +0200, nicolas.lamira...@orange.com wrote:
Le 16/05/2013 15:56, Chip Childers a écrit :
If we were able to upgrade you correctly to 4.1, but security groups were
not yet
functional, would that suffice?
yes.
Anthony,
Since VMware support for SG's in
Sebastian re-opened CLOUDSTACK-2463 due to users wanting to upgrade from
2.x to 4.1. This relates to the security groups feature being available
when using VLANs in an advanced networking zone. This feature was
apparently broken in the 3.x series, and is not slated to be
reintroduced until 4.2.
...@sungard.com]
Sent: 15 May 2013 15:14
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2
Sebastian re-opened CLOUDSTACK-2463 due to users wanting to upgrade from 2.x to
4.1. This relates to the security groups feature being available when using
VLANs
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 03:10:44PM +, Geoff Higginbottom wrote:
Hi Chip,
If I could add my 10 cents worth.
I know of a number of potential CloudStack users who want to deploy
CloudStack, but ONLY when this feature is available as it is critical to
their deployment plans. One of
Half of our platforms are on 2.2.14 (advanced zone with security groups).
These platform work well. We are looking for a way to upgrade to 4.* for
more functionalities, so that we do not need to take the difference of
cloudstack version into account in development.
As I know, the citrix guys are
Subject: Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2
Half of our platforms are on 2.2.14 (advanced zone with security groups).
These platform work well. We are looking for a way to upgrade to 4.* for
more functionalities, so that we do not need to take the difference
from previous releases. We can't strand our user base on a
previous release.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Wei ZHOU [mailto:ustcweiz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 8:28 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved
@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Anthony Xu; Manan Shah; Angeline Shen; Alena Prokharchyk
Subject: Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2
Adding relevant folks from previous discussions of this feature to the CC
list.
One other note... From what I can tell, the work intended for 4.2 to re
I'll work on 4.2, after that, people can merge it to 4.1.
Anthony
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 9:25 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2
33 matches
Mail list logo
