RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

-Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 5:47 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; ustcweiz...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC On Jan 6, 2014, at 9:46 AM, Wei ZHOU wrote: > Hi Abhi, > > I

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

On Jan 6, 2014, at 9:46 AM, Wei ZHOU wrote: > Hi Abhi, > > I have two problems, > (1) 3a999e7 made OVS not working on 4.2, so I fixed it by > commit 79f609ca19fc44aab8de8294f234537936bc3613 > (2) DevCloud does not work after commit > 7f9463bb54f19e7676f8c6049d1ebc02330a730f. So I am wondering

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

On 04/01/14 6:52 pm, "David Nalley" wrote: >Abhi: > >Please send a [VOTE] [RESULT] email with the vote tally. > >I am somewhat surprised that 4.2.1 wasn't tagged using build_asf.sh >during the creation of the RC artifacts. Are you sure you aren't >sitting on the tag locally? Also the tag should

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

4.2.1 RC is now approved as a GA build with following votes: +1 : 7 votes - 3 bindings from Daan, Chip and David. +/-0: 2 votes from Tomesz and sebastian. Some issues have been pointed out by Tomasz (5422,5332 & 3806), Andrei (issue with KVM:S3) and Wei pointed out issues with DevCloud and OVS su

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

On Jan 6, 2014, at 10:34 AM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > Wei, > > I think KVM support for OVS was not a supported feature in 4.2. It can > go as a supported feature in 4.3. > > DevCloud is not a blocker. For the record, I disagree with this statement. For 4.1 and 4.2 we had a release test

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

Wei, The concerns you have raised are valid. I guess we should have more people testing things like DevCloud and XCP. In the past also I have seen that issues with DevCloud are not resolved on priority. From my end if possible I will try to push for testing these much earlier in release cycle. -

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

Abhi, Thanks! -Wei

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

Wei, I think KVM support for OVS was not a supported feature in 4.2. It can go as a supported feature in 4.3. DevCloud is not a blocker. We will go ahead with the release process as of now. -abhi On 06/01/14 2:16 pm, "Wei ZHOU" wrote: >Hi Abhi, > >I have two problems, >(1) 3a999e7 made

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

Hi Abhi, I have two problems, (1) 3a999e7 made OVS not working on 4.2, so I fixed it by commit 79f609ca19fc44aab8de8294f234537936bc3613 (2) DevCloud does not work after commit 7f9463bb54f19e7676f8c6049d1ebc02330a730f. So I am wondering if XCP works after that. -Wei 2013/12/17 Abhinandan Prate

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

>>4 can be done by any PMC member; but needs 24 hours for syncing of >>mirrors prior to announcement. If Chip doesn't pick this up, I'll push >>bits in place tonight or tomorrow. >> I've pushed bits into place. I also removed the bits for 4.1.0 and 4.2.0 so that they are only in the archives while

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

On 04/01/14 6:52 pm, "David Nalley" wrote: >Abhi: > >Please send a [VOTE] [RESULT] email with the vote tally. Sure. > >I am somewhat surprised that 4.2.1 wasn't tagged using build_asf.sh >during the creation of the RC artifacts. Are you sure you aren't >sitting on the tag locally? Also the tag s

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

On 03.01.2014 18:54, Edison Su wrote: Thanks for your binaries, community can use your binaries if anybody wants to enable KVM snapshot on EL6. I have found a better way of "fixing" this, as I got more familiar with the ACS inner workings. Wrote a few details here: http://www.nux.ro/archive/2

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

Abhi: Please send a [VOTE] [RESULT] email with the vote tally. I am somewhat surprised that 4.2.1 wasn't tagged using build_asf.sh during the creation of the RC artifacts. Are you sure you aren't sitting on the tag locally? Also the tag should be 4.2.1, look at the other tags for examples. Pleas

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

Now that we have the necessary votes we need to move ahead, these are the next steps, will be looking for advice from PMC: Next steps: 1. Tag the git commit with 4.2.1_GA 2. Building and publishing packages (DEB and RPM) 3. Publishing the docs here cloudstack.apache.org/docs 4. Put the artefacts

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

Yep - I am otherwise happy with this RC. Consider my -1 retracted and a +1 (binding) (which I think gives us the three necessary) Thanks for all of the work checking on this folks. --David On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > I know Hugo made something to include it in the rp

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

> -Original Message- > From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] > Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 10:45 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC > > On 03.01.2014 18:31, Edison Su wrote: > > Regarding to KVM binari

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

On 03.01.2014 18:31, Edison Su wrote: Regarding to KVM binaries, in order to make volume snapshot working with cloudstack, we need KVM hypervisor support following features: 1. disk only snapshot, don't save vm memory(saving vm memory usually takes several seconds. In RHEL <6.3, it will even take

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

> -Original Message- > From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] > Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 8:37 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC > > On 03.01.2014 15:17, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > I know Hugo made som

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

Thanks Nux and happy Newyear :-) Regards Sadhu -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: 03 January 2014 22:07 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC On 03.01.2014 15:17, Daan Hoogland wrote: > I know Hugo m

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

On 03.01.2014 15:17, Daan Hoogland wrote: I know Hugo made something to include it in the rpm. I'm not sure if this is on the 4.2 branch. Look in the root dir of the archive. @David: you casted a -1. Can you get your conscience to retract that? @all: how do we go from here? The RPMs that I use

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

I know Hugo made something to include it in the rpm. I'm not sure if this is on the 4.2 branch. Look in the root dir of the archive. @David: you casted a -1. Can you get your conscience to retract that? @all: how do we go from here? regards On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Nux! wrote: > On 03.01

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

On 03/01/14 8:11 pm, "Nux!" wrote: >On 03.01.2014 14:32, Daan Hoogland wrote: >> This spin was created by Abhinandan at the 17th so, give us a commit >> id so we can determine if we can release it, can you? > >Would this commit id be somewhere in the RPMs? Cause I long wiped out >the VM used to b

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

On 03.01.2014 14:32, Daan Hoogland wrote: This spin was created by Abhinandan at the 17th so, give us a commit id so we can determine if we can release it, can you? Would this commit id be somewhere in the RPMs? Cause I long wiped out the VM used to build them. Anyway, the 17th should also be

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

This spin was created by Abhinandan at the 17th so, give us a commit id so we can determine if we can release it, can you? On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Nux! wrote: > On 03.01.2014 14:17, Daan Hoogland wrote: >> >> sudha, nux, >> >> getting back to the vote at hand; are we talking about the 4.2

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

On 03.01.2014 14:17, Daan Hoogland wrote: sudha, nux, getting back to the vote at hand; are we talking about the 4.2.1 release candidate (or a later snapshot from that branch) In all these tests I used a build from github 4.2 master as of 21st of December 2013. Not sure if that's later than R

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

sudha, nux, getting back to the vote at hand; are we talking about the 4.2.1 release candidate (or a later snapshot from that branch) On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Nux! wrote: > On 03.01.2014 13:54, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: >> >> Thanks Nux for confirmation. Is it okay to close this issue in JI

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

On 03.01.2014 13:54, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: Thanks Nux for confirmation. Is it okay to close this issue in JIRA ?? Hi, Thanks and yes. I can also confirm qemu-img-rhev-0.12.1.2-2.355.el6 works fine with GlusterFS share mount point, at least the snapshotting part. Lucian -- Sent from the

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

Thanks Nux for confirmation. Is it okay to close this issue in JIRA ?? -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 12:33 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC On 03.01.2014 07:40, Nux! wrote

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

On 03.01.2014 07:40, Nux! wrote: Guys, this is really confusing! First of all I could swear I had this feature working on me previously on a similar setup, second of all why has your colleague Sadhu said this is working[1]? Also Andrei Mikhailovsky claims in this same thread the feature is workin

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

On 02.01.2014 23:41, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 2:56 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC On 02.01.2014 22:12, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: [Animesh

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

-Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 2:56 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC On 02.01.2014 22:12, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > [Animesh] Nux, as Edison mentioned KVM Snapshot

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

On 02.01.2014 22:12, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: [Animesh] Nux, as Edison mentioned KVM Snapshot are not supported in ACS. We use customized qemu internally which allows us to take snapshots but cannot be redistributed in ACS [Animesh] because of license incompatibility I know[1], my issue is no

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

-Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 2:11 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Edison Su Subject: RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2014 3:48

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

-Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2014 3:48 AM To: Edison Su Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC On 31.12.2013 23:47, Edison Su wrote: >> -Original Message- >&g

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

On 31.12.2013 19:48, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: Nux, Defect 5393 [1] is not reproducible in 4.3 so that got closed. Can you open a new one for 4.2.1 with exact problem you are having. Done. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5709 I have installed a new ACS today, single-host to ke

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

On 31.12.2013 23:47, Edison Su wrote: -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 6:35 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC On 23.12.2013 05:42, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: It gives me immense

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

On 31.12.2013 23:47, Edison Su wrote: -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 6:35 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC On 23.12.2013 05:42, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: It gives me immense

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

> -Original Message- > From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] > Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 6:35 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC > > On 23.12.2013 05:42, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > > It gives me imme

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

ng for ASF 4.2.1 RC Yes ,I have tested with latest from 4.2.1. Regards sadhu -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: 31 December 2013 18:47 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC Suresh, did you test with latest

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

Yes ,I have tested with latest from 4.2.1. Regards sadhu -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: 31 December 2013 18:47 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC Suresh, did you test with latest from 4.2.1 or the

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

se provide more > details on your setup . > > > > Regards > Sadhu > > > > -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: 30 December 2013 02:26 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

On 31.12.2013 12:48, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: Suresh has tried reproducing the issue as per comment in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5393. The issue is not reproducible. As per comment in 5393 I think Nux! is going to verify, hoping that it is done at the earliest. Thank you

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

Suresh has tried reproducing the issue as per comment in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5393. The issue is not reproducible. As per comment in 5393 I think Nux! is going to verify, hoping that it is done at the earliest. Thank you guys ! -abhi On 23/12/13 8:04 pm, "Nux!" wrote:

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC -1 (binding) because of the snapshot issues pointed out by Nux, (CLOUDSTACK-5393) --David On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > The 4.2.1 is re-spun mainly because the commit that

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

...@gnsa.us] Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2013 12:56 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC -1 (binding) because of the snapshot issues pointed out by Nux, (CLOUDSTACK-5393) --David On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > The 4.

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > Every time a RC is made it is flagged off due to some bug or the other at > the last moment. > > I was wondering if before a RC is cut we take a pre-vote making sure that > everyone has got sufficient time to test the branch for the feat

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

Every time a RC is made it is flagged off due to some bug or the other at the last moment. I was wondering if before a RC is cut we take a pre-vote making sure that everyone has got sufficient time to test the branch for the features they are looking for ? Another suggestion is that since 4.3 is

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

-1 (binding) because of the snapshot issues pointed out by Nux, (CLOUDSTACK-5393) --David On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > The 4.2.1 is re-spun mainly because the commit that was used to generate the > previous RC did not get pushed to repo. > > Following are the par

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

Thanks Chip, I was not aware of this requirement. On 23/12/13 7:40 pm, "Chip Childers" wrote: >Unfortunately, no... this vote has not passed yet. We need 1 more >PMC vote. Wei is a committer, but we have to have 3 PMC +1 votes for >legal reasons. > >PMC members, please vote! > >On Mon, Dec 23

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

e point of snapshots is broken as there is no use for the snapshots if you can not create / roll back vms from them. Thanks Andrei - Original Message - From: "Andrei Mikhailovsky" To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Monday, 23 December, 2013 2:52:37 PM Subject: Re: [

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

do some more testing to verify and post management server logs. Andrei - Original Message - From: "Nux!" To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Monday, 23 December, 2013 2:34:31 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC On 23.12.2013 05:42, Abhinandan Pr

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

On 23.12.2013 05:42, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: It gives me immense pleasure to inform that the vote to label this ASF 4.2.1 RC as the GA release has been passed with following stats: Can someone check KVM volume snapshots before declaring this GA? It's been consistently broken for me in 4.2.1-

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

Unfortunately, no... this vote has not passed yet. We need 1 more PMC vote. Wei is a committer, but we have to have 3 PMC +1 votes for legal reasons. PMC members, please vote! On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 12:42 AM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > It gives me immense pleasure to inform that the vote to

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

It gives me immense pleasure to inform that the vote to label this ASF 4.2.1 RC as the GA release has been passed with following stats: +1 : 6 votes includes 3 bindings from Daan, Wei and Chip. +/-0 : from Tomasz. Some issues have been pointed out by Tomasz (5422,5332 & 3806) and Andrei (issue

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

ay, 20 December, 2013 4:38:11 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC Really quick, Andrei, the command looks like it's passing both the root volume and an iso template as disks. I'm assuming you still have the iso attached to the VM. If this is not the case, we probab

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

Really quick, Andrei, the command looks like it's passing both the root volume and an iso template as disks. I'm assuming you still have the iso attached to the VM. If this is not the case, we probably need to know about it in the bug submission as well. With the iso detached, it should not show up

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

Andrei, There are one or two spots in the KVM code that still assume that secondary storage is always NFS. In this particular example, it seems like maybe you're running into this: if (volume.getType() == Volume.Type.ISO && data.getPath() != null) { NfsTO nfsStore = (NfsTO)st

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 01:49:14PM +, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > The 4.2.1 is re-spun mainly because the commit that was used to generate the > previous RC did not get pushed to repo. > > Following are the particulars to vote for this time around: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

he.org Sent: Friday, 20 December, 2013 10:47:13 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC I think at this time we will just document these as known issues. Any comments ? -abhi On 20/12/13 11:42 am, "Pavan Bandarupally" wrote: >In 4.2.1 , I have tested the

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

ndarupally" To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 20 December, 2013 6:12:42 AM Subject: RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC In 4.2.1 , I have tested the feature where user has the option to choose single part or multi part upload with S3 store. It worked fine in my e

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

relationship with S3 store I guess. >>>Once your VM is deployed from a template on S3 store the template will >>>be >>>first copied to primary store from secondary store for the VM to be >>>deployed. >>> >>>Regards, >>>Pavan >>&g

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

onship with S3 store I guess. >>Once your VM is deployed from a template on S3 store the template will be >>first copied to primary store from secondary store for the VM to be >>deployed. >> >>Regards, >>Pavan >>-----Original Message- >>From: An

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

al Message- >From: Andrei Mikhailovsky [mailto:and...@arhont.com] >Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 10:20 PM >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >Subject: Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC > > > >Daan, > >Not sure if this is relevant to this release, but the

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

for the VM to be deployed. Regards, Pavan -Original Message- From: Andrei Mikhailovsky [mailto:and...@arhont.com] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 10:20 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC Daan, Not sure if this is relevant to th

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

I do not really know the criteria for version releases. Cheers - Original Message - From: "Daan Hoogland" To: "dev" Sent: Thursday, 19 December, 2013 3:04:54 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC Andrei, This sounds like a serious is

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

t.api.to.S3TO cannot be cast to > com.cloud.agent.api.to.NfsTO > at > com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.getVolumePath(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3628) > at > com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComp

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

On 19/12/13 8:10 pm, "Tomasz Zięba" wrote: >+/- 0 because of simple bugs: >CLOUDSTACK-5422 >CLOUDSTACK-5332 >CLOUDSTACK-3806 The tickets should addressed in upcoming release, have updated the fix version. -abhi

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:701) 2) Spanshoting seems to be totally broken: - any ROOT volume for any instance is always marked as OVM Hypervisor (not KVM) which brakes the normal behaviour of the action buttons filter in scripts/storage.js in the G

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

+/- 0 because of simple bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5422 CLOUDSTACK-5332 CLOUDSTACK-3806 -- Regards, Tomasz Zięba Twitter: @TZieba LinkedIn: pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zięba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

37 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC +1 ~Talluri On 18/12/13 10:57 am, "Sailaja Mada" wrote: >+1 > >Validated from the specified commit id. > >Thanks, >Sailaja.M > >-Original Message- >From: Abhinanda

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

+1 ~Talluri On 18/12/13 10:57 am, "Sailaja Mada" wrote: >+1 > >Validated from the specified commit id. > >Thanks, >Sailaja.M > >-Original Message- >From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com] >Sent: 17 December 2013 19:19 >To: CloudStack Dev >Subject: [VOTE] 3rd ro

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

+1 Validated from the specified commit id. Thanks, Sailaja.M -Original Message- From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com] Sent: 17 December 2013 19:19 To: CloudStack Dev Subject: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC The 4.2.1 is re-spun mainly because the

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

+1 2013/12/17 Abhinandan Prateek > The 4.2.1 is re-spun mainly because the commit that was used to generate > the previous RC did not get pushed to repo. > > Following are the particulars to vote for this time around: > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=r