Re: Review Request 18114: Fix findbugs findings in cloudstack-service-console-proxy-rdpclient

> On Feb. 19, 2014, 7:34 a.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > Miguel, can you check the last version of your patch versus current > > master? Anything we missed? I did review the patch. I don't see anything missing. Why do you ask? - Miguel --

Re: Review Request 18114: Fix findbugs findings in cloudstack-service-console-proxy-rdpclient

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18114/#review34990 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Miguel Ferreira On Feb. 14, 2014, 2:48 p.m.,

Re: Review Request 17889: CLOUDSTACK-4762: Enabling vGPU support for XenServer.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17889/ --- (Updated Feb. 20, 2014, 8:24 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang, D

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

Hugo, I manually prepared the 64-bit systemvm template via https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4864. In the JIRA bug I explained the issues with the default template and also attached the modified OVF file as well. I can add a wiki page explaining the exact changes done. I looke

RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS

I have tried to put all together in FS at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Cloudstack+Windowsfication as Feedback section and added my comments there. Please verify once and let me know if anything is to be added there. Thanks & Regards Damodar/ -Original Message

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

Hyper-V template is generated from the Jenkins job and same is tested and specified here. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Trippie [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 1:18 PM To: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

Xen and KVM templates are build by the jenkins, tested and then moved to download.cloud.com server. -abhi On 20/02/14 1:53 pm, "Sateesh Chodapuneedi" wrote: >Hugo, > >I manually prepared the 64-bit systemvm template via >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4864. > >In the JIRA bug

Re: devcloud 2 to 3 - network configuration

Am I correct in thinking that: xenbr0 is required for domU guests to be accessed from the host (via the guest's 192.168.56.x address) ? xenbr1 is required for domU guests to access the internet (via the hosts NAT interface) ? Any one got any ideas what else needs to be done (e.g. xen configuratio

RE: OVS plugin in CloudStack 4.3.0

...so is it still the case that you can't migrate VMs when using GRE Tunnels? I hope to test GRE in RC6 today. Regards, Paul Angus Cloud Architect S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: @CloudyAngus [email protected] -Original Message- From: [email protected] [mailto:ng.t..

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

Animesh, Thanks for the clarification I'll update the release notes shortly, but I also notice there are no references to the Hyper-V Template in the currently release notes, is anyone able to add the correct settings. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M:

Re: Review Request 18277: CLOUDSTACK-6015: initial check in for selenium based client side automated testing

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18277/#review34991 --- Thanks for these tests. Please add apache license headers to all pyt

Re: OVS plugin in CloudStack 4.3.0

On Feb 19, 2014, at 6:45 PM, Florin Dumitrascu wrote: > Hi Tuna, > > Can you please clarify what is the status of the functionality described > below in relation to 4.3 release: > > http://cloudstack.readthedocs.org/en/latest/networking/ovs-plugin.html quick note to say that this is not yet

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

OK, the systemvm status is making more sense now. For everybody just as confused as me by the current discussion let me try to summarize. SystemVM template build process: Currently there is a build process for the systemvm template in the CloudStack source code. This build process is using v

[Proposal] HyperV supporting features in 4.4

Hi All, Hyper-V Hypervisor support is added in 4.3. For 4.4 release, following functionalities will be supported on Hyper-V. We (Rajesh, Devdeep, Anshul) would be working on writing the features for Hyper-V. 1. HA for guest VMs 2. VPC 3. Network throttling 4. Primary storage: iSCSI

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-rn pull request: Fixed System VM Templates

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/2 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. To do so, please top-post your response. If your project does not have this featu

RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS

One question I have is, Which version of windows we need to target? Thanks & Regards Damodar/ -Original Message- From: Damoder Reddy [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 2:04 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS

RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS

AFAIK, it would be windows server 2k3, 2k8 2012, 2012R2. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Damoder Reddy [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 4:32 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS One question I h

Re: [DISCUSS] Browser-based template and volume uploads

why not a allowing a simple file:///home/me/my.template kind of url? for simple installations this should do. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:42 PM, John Kinsella wrote: > We definitely need to support more than http download. http upload sounds > interesting, but I'd love to see something more resi

RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS

Isn't the hyper-v support dependant on using 2012r2 ? So I don't know if I'd bother with going back as far as 2003 Regards, Paul Angus Cloud Architect S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: @CloudyAngus [email protected] -Original Message- From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh

Re: Review Request 18016: CLOUDSTACK-5626: Simplifying VM Migrate code

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18016/#review34996 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Santhosh Edukulla On Feb. 14, 2014, 7:54 a.m

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

On 20.02.2014 00:10, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: Folks I want to clear up the confusion on system templates for 4.3 I have noticed the system vms come up with 128 MB ram, isn't this a bit too little for 64bit machines? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.n

RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS

I can't think of anything that wouldn't be possible on W2k3 - that said It's old and I can't see people having a need for it. Regards Alex Hitchins D: +44 1892 523 587 | S: +44 2036 030 540 | M: +44 7788 423 969 [email protected] -Original Message- From: Paul Angus [mailto:

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

> -Original Message- > From: Nux! [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 20 February 2014 17:05 > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round) > > On 20.02.2014 00:10, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > Folks > > > > I want to clear up the confusion on syst

Re: Can't login to webui

Hi, I find this sometimes happens if enough ram is not available. Please insure you have at least 2gb of ram. On 19 February 2014 19:37, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Typically Mac OS X 10.8.3 or Ubuntu 12.04. This is always set up for > development purposes. I don't use the scripts that an admin wo

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

On 20.02.2014 11:58, Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote: -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 20 February 2014 17:05 To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round) On 20.02.2014 00:10, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: Folks I want to cle

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

+1 (binding) based on the rc-5 testing I've done and a diff of the releases. The extra patch I asked for is being tested by Hugo, no doubt he will approve shortly. On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Nux! wrote: > On 20.02.2014 11:58, Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote: >>> >>> -Original Message- >

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

+1 Have now successfully tested the new VPC Remote VPN feature, and all other tests pass (based on upgrading a clean build from 4.2.1 and deploying new Zone) Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 [email protected] -Origina

Re: Review Request 18165: FindBugs findings: fixing equals() methods in 2 classes; commenting out dead variable in 1 class; adding 5 tests to cover the changes in the equals() methods.

> On Feb. 15, 2014, 12:53 p.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > Heya, did you test this with devcloud as well? > > Wilder Rodrigues wrote: > Unfortunately not. I got the link error when trying it in my environment > over my network. Will try to refresh the mac addresses on the net adapters in >

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

+1 (binding) Tested: XenServer 6.2, Primary NFS, Secondary NFS, Two physical networks with Guest traffic on both Tested 64bit systemvm template (jenkins version) Tested SSVM using the Xen VHD template Tested instance creation on VLAN based networks Tested instance creation on NS

Re: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS

There's a difference in incidentally working and validated to work on. I'd limit focus to making sure it works on 2k12r2. --David On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:37 AM, Alex Hitchins wrote: > I can't think of anything that wouldn't be possible on W2k3 - that said It's > old and I can't see people hav

[DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

Hi folks, I cringe to raise this issue. After 6 RCs I am sure we are all feeling a little bit of release vote fatigue. Especially Animesh. I apologize in advance; in all other respects I am ready to give a +1 to RC6. I've been playing with 4.3.0-rc6 for a couple of days now. I attempted to build

Review Request 18309: sysctl improvements

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18309/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang, daan Hoogland, and Hugo Trippaers. R

Re: Master blocker CLOUDSTACK-6130

Hey, Should be fixed by: commit ba7ff5369cc602c7e0c8d788b6617f27123c2328 Author: Hugo Trippaers Date: Thu Feb 20 14:04:51 2014 +0100 Fix parameter index in getCount function. @Talluri, Agreed. However with the current way of testing it is really hard to see which commit actually broke

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

On 02/20/2014 02:37 PM, David Nalley wrote: Hi folks, I cringe to raise this issue. After 6 RCs I am sure we are all feeling a little bit of release vote fatigue. Especially Animesh. I apologize in advance; in all other respects I am ready to give a +1 to RC6. My apologies, I didn't find the

Review Request 18310: dnsmasq fix for bridged networks

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18310/ --- Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland, Hugo Trippaers, and Sheng Yang. R

[Responsiveness report] 2014w05 usr

http://markmail.org/message/6qcus5e7qihkh2sy Agent kvm not start: Not allowed to connect to the server: sent incorrect data center: default by [email protected] http://markmail.org/message/wwkauchx7o73kidk agent can't start by [email protected] http://markmail.org/message/o7m6mwhdyli5dazc Trou

[Responsiveness report] 2014w05 dev

http://markmail.org/message/2uu5ly7is3i6tkqn Error creating bean with name 'lockMasterListener' by Alex Hitchins http://markmail.org/message/4zatk66ild4xsxwa Unable to add host with latest build on RHEL6 master by Manikanta Kattamuri http://markmail.org/message/qoq3734bm7abhk7e RSA Key Issue by Ale

[Responsiveness report] 2014w04 dev

http://markmail.org/message/ocv5dj36xbfdm7wp UI Issues by Alex Hitchins http://markmail.org/message/ats22vo6benycwgm Doc Build Reflects No Recent Changes ! by Radhika Puthiyetath http://markmail.org/message/j7lms5py3cszmn5z OpenVswitch | KVM | CentOS 6.5 | Cloudstack 4.2 by Maurice Lawler for an

[Responsiveness report] 2014w03 dev

http://markmail.org/message/cwuq5dgkya4qhpnj Why i cannot set vpn on Source NAT IP by Yitao Jiang http://markmail.org/message/55ydrna6ikmjiuf5 CloudStack 4.2 | Cent OS 6.4 | KVM by Maurice Lawler http://markmail.org/message/z3b2yeg6zidcjkwq Issue in creating template from volume in vmware hyperviso

[Responsiveness report] 2014w02 dev

http://markmail.org/message/xyhzffhc44dqxgxo devcloud system VMs problem by Victor Rodionov for an explanation of this report see https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Responsiveness+report -- Daan

Re: Review Request 15932: Add support for Primary Storage on Gluster using the libvirt backend

> On Feb. 19, 2014, 1:35 p.m., Wido den Hollander wrote: > > It seems good to me. Applies cleanly to master and builds just fine. > > > > Code-wise it's simple but effective, should allow us to support Gluster. I just merged it into master and pushed. So gluster is in master right now! Niels,

RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS

I agree totally, my point was that while there is nothing technically stopping us going for w2k3 there is little reason to do so. Regards Alex Hitchins D: +44 1892 523 587 | S: +44 2036 030 540 | M: +44 7788 423 969 [email protected] -Original Message- From: David Nalley [m

Re: CLOUDSTACK-6015

Yichi has submitted a review to add selenium tests. But for some reason I can't assign him the 6015 bug. Could someone with karma try ? thanks On Feb 6, 2014, at 9:43 PM, Yichi Lu wrote: > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Yichi Lu > Date: Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:13 PM > Su

RE: OVS plugin in CloudStack 4.3.0

Hi Paul, I would be very curious to hear your feedback. I am not able to get GRE working with RC6. The OVS bridge is created, but the GRE tunnel is not. So far I have tried (using XenServer 6.1.0): a) 2 hosts within different clusters and different pods b) 2 hosts within different cluster and sam

RE: OVS plugin in CloudStack 4.3.0

Have you set sdn.ovs.controller = true And sdn.ovs.controller.default.label = < > in the global settings (and restarted mgmt. server) Regards, Paul Angus Cloud Architect S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: @CloudyAngus [email protected] -Original Message- From: Florin Dum

[Responsiveess report] 2014w06 usr

http://markmail.org/message/4r3hlg4rsdus42gu DNS question by Zack Payton http://markmail.org/message/tnfl6rz2ncbiyqle Can't start cloudstack-usage by Sean Hamilton http://markmail.org/message/py4tv4cehmp4klrl Reg: Storage tags by Prakash.M http://markmail.org/message/qdbuihkh4yyjycx2 CloudStack sto

RE: OVS plugin in CloudStack 4.3.0

Yes, sdn.ovs.controller = true sdn.ovs.controller.default.label = GUEST // label used on XenServer guest network Without the OVS controller switched on, I think one will not see the OVS bridge created. The first part of the setup works, allocating a GRE key from the VLAN range, setting up the

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #319

See -- [...truncated 17386 lines...] 1443/1875 KB 1446/1875 KB 1449/1875 KB 1453/1875 KB 1457/1875 KB 1461/1875 KB 1465/1875 KB 1469/1875 KB 1473/1875 KB 1477/1875 KB 1480/1

[DOCS][DISCUSS] heads-up main docs repo refactor

Hi, With the change of format for docs, I have started to refactor the main docs repo "cloudstack-docs.git" The allocator,midonet,nicira,qig,vxlan and release notes guides have been converted to .rst format. I am moving the docbook version of these guides into an /archive directory for the ti

Re: Working on CloudStack Jira-764:nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC email 2 of 2

All, Here's what I've got so far with partitioning the problem. There are 3 main areas I've found so far along with a proposal for implementation. Keepalived: As Is: Current VRR network configuration setup is assumed by the existing code to be static. A single Keepalived config template file

Re: Xen Server Setup

Hi, Sorry for the late response. If you can describe your setup I am sure I can get you in motion. thanks. On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 3:12 AM, Maurice Lawler wrote: > Has anyone setup a public facing cloudstack with Xen server. I want to be > able to provide the internal systems with a 10.x IP add

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master #320

See

Fwd: Warning from [email protected]

Hi guys, I got this in my mail box from last year. I honestly do not know how I missed this. Isn't this a little odd as I have been able to mail you guys successfully. Kind Regards, Onuonga Frankie -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 4:55 PM Subject: Warnin

Re: Review Request 18309: sysctl improvements

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18309/#review35005 --- systemvm/patches/debian/buildsystemvm.sh

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 04:25:21AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > Given the recently noticed legal issues with the mysql-connector-java dependency, I'm -1 (binding) until that is resolved. -chip

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 08:37:46AM -0500, David Nalley wrote: > Hi folks, > > I cringe to raise this issue. After 6 RCs I am sure we are all feeling > a little bit of release vote fatigue. Especially Animesh. I apologize > in advance; in all other respects I am ready to give a +1 to RC6. > > I've

Re: [DISCUSS] Browser-based template and volume uploads

You mean to load files off the management server, yea? That makes sense to me On Feb 20, 2014, at 3:14 AM, Daan Hoogland mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: why not a allowing a simple file:///home/me/my.template kind of url? for simple installations this should do. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at

RE: [DOCS][DISCUSS] heads-up main docs repo refactor

Hi, >From Citrix-perspective, this is going to be effort intensive considering the >current head count for documentation. For 4.3, we would like to continue with DocBook, as per our earlier consensus. I shall come back with a concrete plan soon after completing the 4.3 feature documentation.

Re: Master blocker CLOUDSTACK-6130

On 20/02/14 7:14 pm, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote: >Hey, > >Should be fixed by: >commit ba7ff5369cc602c7e0c8d788b6617f27123c2328 >Author: Hugo Trippaers >Date: Thu Feb 20 14:04:51 2014 +0100 > >Fix parameter index in getCount function. > > >@Talluri, Agreed. However with the current way of te

Re: [DOCS][DISCUSS] heads-up main docs repo refactor

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote: > Hi, > > From Citrix-perspective, this is going to be effort intensive considering the > current head count for documentation. > Citrix has no standing in Apache CloudStack decisions. What is your individual opinion with your CloudSta

Re: OVS plugin in CloudStack 4.3.0

On 20/02/14 8:40 PM, "Florin Dumitrascu" wrote: >Yes, > >sdn.ovs.controller = true >sdn.ovs.controller.default.label = GUEST // label used on XenServer >guest network > >Without the OVS controller switched on, I think one will not see the OVS >bridge created. >The first part of the setup works,

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 04:25:21AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> > > Given the recently noticed legal issues with the mysql-connector-java > depen

RE: [DOCS][DISCUSS] heads-up main docs repo refactor

Because I am a Citrix employee, who has the day-to-day work to complete. There was a mail thread that only post 4.3 release, we can switch to RST. Let me hunt down. -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 11:05 PM To: dev@cloudstack

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 08:37:46AM -0500, David Nalley wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> I cringe to raise this issue. After 6 RCs I am sure we are all feeling >> a little bit of release vote fatigue. Especially Animesh. I apologize >> in advance; i

Re: Review Request 18310: dnsmasq fix for bridged networks

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18310/#review35020 --- Ship it! Looks good to me. Also I've confirmed that even with this

Re: Review Request 18310: dnsmasq fix for bridged networks

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18310/#review35021 --- Ship it! Looks good to me. Also I've confirmed that even with this

Re: Review Request 18310: dnsmasq fix for bridged networks

> On Feb. 20, 2014, 6:17 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > Looks good to me. > > > > Also I've confirmed that even with this option, the MAC would show in > > dnsmasq.log, which is necessary for debug. > > > > Applied to MASTER. Thanks! > > Sheng Yang wrote: > One moment, on a second thought, e

Re: Review Request 18310: dnsmasq fix for bridged networks

> On Feb. 20, 2014, 6:17 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > Looks good to me. > > > > Also I've confirmed that even with this option, the MAC would show in > > dnsmasq.log, which is necessary for debug. > > > > Applied to MASTER. Thanks! One moment, on a second thought, even with current setup, dnsm

RE: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

Chip, David thanks for the detailed explanation, is one of you taking care of fixing this issue or we need to find other volunteers Thanks Animesh > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 10:13 AM > To: dev@cloudstack

Re: Working on CloudStack Jira-764:nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC email 2 of 2

Hi Karl, An separate way to VR to configure keepalived/conntrackd besides cloud-early-setup is a must without doubt. But a separate API may not be necessary. So here is the question: can keepalived/conntrackd used independently regardless of network setup? I think the answer for now is no. I be

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

I will try to work on this a bit this evening, but others may be faster. --David On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Chip, David thanks for the detailed explanation, is one of you taking care of > fixing this issue or we need to find other volunteers > > Thanks > Animes

Re: Review Request 18277: CLOUDSTACK-6015: initial check in for selenium based client side automated testing

Sebastien: I'll add apache license headers to them, possibly together with some code that I want to submit. But how do I add a wiki page? I created an account for myself for https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/. I saw Parth Jagirdar has a page un

Re: [DISCUSS] Browser-based template and volume uploads

Yes, shouldn't take to much work. On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:01 PM, John Kinsella wrote: > You mean to load files off the management server, yea? That makes sense to me > > On Feb 20, 2014, at 3:14 AM, Daan Hoogland > mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > why not a allowing a simple file://

Re: [DISCUSS] Browser-based template and volume uploads

This isn't for the admin. The end user has no access to the MS file system or any direct access to the secondary storage NFS server. The only frontend available to the NFS secondary share is the SSVM. Re: dropbox: that is already available : enter a URL. On 2/20/14 11:05 AM, "Daan Hoogland" wrot

Re: [DISCUSS] Browser-based template and volume uploads

On 19.02.2014 22:12, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: Hi all, The fact that one has to have a HTTP server to host templates before the templates can be imported into secondary storage is an inconvenience. I am not sure how much of an inconvenience it is, but I was asked to detail the technical architectu

Re: Master blocker CLOUDSTACK-6130

Sent from my iPhone > On 20 feb. 2014, at 18:31, Srikanteswararao Talluri > wrote: > > > >> On 20/02/14 7:14 pm, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote: >> >> Hey, >> >> Should be fixed by: >> commit ba7ff5369cc602c7e0c8d788b6617f27123c2328 >> Author: Hugo Trippaers >> Date: Thu Feb 20 14:04:51 2014

Re: [DISCUSS] Browser-based template and volume uploads

You are right Chiradeep, When talking about real simple installations It would be nice, though. for a bit more you would not want this indeed. So it would be an extra for the administrator. I still like the idea. As for you wiki page, I presume you want to propose both implementations, Or are you

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

Will this cause issues with people running ACS from maven jetty (or any other maven operation that needs the db) if the connector isn't pulled in by the pom? I could see it being added to support that need. If they are running it from a tomcat instance managed by eclipse, it would be pretty easy

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Nate Gordon wrote: > Will this cause issues with people running ACS from maven jetty (or any > other maven operation that needs the db) if the connector isn't pulled in > by the pom? I could see it being added to support that need. If they are > running it from a

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Chip, David thanks for the detailed explanation, is one of you taking care of > fixing this issue or we need to find other volunteers I'm sorry to say that I do not have the available cycles. $dayjob + getting ready for a few days off

RE: Master blocker CLOUDSTACK-6130

> -Original Message- > From: Trippie [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 5:45 AM > To: > Cc: Hugo Trippaers; Ian Southam > Subject: Re: Master blocker CLOUDSTACK-6130 > > Hey, > > Should be fixed by: > commit ba7ff5369cc602c7e0c8d7

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

Real quick, because I don't know if I will be able to track this thread in detail starting tonight... Take this as input to the discussion that the whole community needs to have about the *potential* problem with the current situation. Legal documentation as well as application of the "valid lice

Re: Font question in GUI

I needed to set up a CloudPlatform 4.2 environment today to perform a certification test and noticed this font issue exists on 4.2, as well. On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Mike Tutkowski < [email protected]> wrote: > Anyone know if there is already a JIRA ticket open for this issue

Authentication and devCloud

Hi! I am a student and I'm doing work about authentication CloudStack. Does anyone could provide me a document or picture that explains the authentication model, or a reference that I can use as an introduction? Moreover, I have trying to install devCloud , but I have a problem with maven . Th

Re: [DISCUSS] Browser-based template and volume uploads

Nux, that's an entirely different problem. Care to raise a feature request? On 2/20/14 11:34 AM, "Nux!" wrote: >On 19.02.2014 22:12, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> The fact that one has to have a HTTP server to host templates before >> the templates can be imported into secondary sto

Re: [DISCUSS] Browser-based template and volume uploads

On 20.02.2014 23:04, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: Nux, that's an entirely different problem. Care to raise a feature request? It's been here for a while: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5305 It's a major PITA for me (and I imagine for anyone else who wants to sell cloud publicly).

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/master to 67fc2f5

Hi folks, I've been working on the legal issue wrt mysql-connector-java dependency, and it's worse than originally feared. We have a compile dependency on GPL'ed software. This was committed to master (and 4.3) back in November. We have not released this software. Please consider this a -1 (veto)

Re: [DISCUSS] Browser-based template and volume uploads

Heh, AWS seems to manage fine without it. But that is AWS. Service offerings are only for compute, there is a separate disk offering for the data volumes. Presumably the data volumes can be used for persistent storage (e.g., db files). What is the difference between a 40G Drupal template and an 80G

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

I may be wrong here, and far from being an expert at this, but isn't the MariaDB connector doing the same thing, but under a Lesser GPL license? Which would solve a lot of licensing issues (no need to put CloudStack entirely on GPL). FG On 2/20/2014, 5:10 PM, Chip Childers wrote: Real quick,

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Francois Gaudreault wrote: > I may be wrong here, and far from being an expert at this, but isn't the > MariaDB connector doing the same thing, but under a Lesser GPL license? > Which would solve a lot of licensing issues (no need to put CloudStack > entirely on GP

VMware and NFS

Hey dev guys, I just recently got CS up and running with vmware. However I am running into an issue where it seems my esxi hosts are not mounting the secondary NFS storage. NFS is working as I can mount to it from other linux boxes, and I can mount a NFS datastore from the hypervisors. In my lo

Re: VMware and NFS

Couple of questions. Did you seed the system vm template onto the sec. storage ? And can you mount that template location in sec. storage on your management server ? On 20/02/14 6:32 PM, "Michael Phillips" wrote: >Hey dev guys, I just recently got CS up and running with vmware. However >I am run

Re: VMware and NFS

I may be remembering this incorrectly, but for VMware doesn't the management server have to be able to mount the secondary storage NFS share to /mnt/sec? On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Nitin Mehta wrote: > Couple of questions. > Did you seed the system vm template onto the sec. storage ? And

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

I find a little ironic that the internal policies are a lot more restrictive than the Apache license itself :S Meanwhile, isn't CloudStack falling into the MySQL FOSS exception? http://www.mysql.com/about/legal/licensing/foss-exception/ Francois On 2/20/2014, 9:20 PM, David Nalley wrote: On

RE: VMware and NFS

Yes to both... > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: VMware and NFS > Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 02:39:01 + > > Couple of questions. > Did you seed the system vm template onto the sec. storage ? And can you > mount that template location in sec. storage on

RE: VMware and NFS

Interesting as I do see errors in the mgmt log in regards to /mnt/sec...however if I am understanding the architecture correctly isn't it the hypervisor that needs access to the secondary storage? The mgmt server only needs to access secondary storage to be able to seed the templates right? >

Re: VMware and NFS

Yes, the hypervisor does need to mount the NFS share, but I seem to remember there being something unusual about VMware in that the management server needed to be able to mount the NFS share, as well. On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Michael Phillips wrote: > Interesting as I do see errors in th

RE: VMware and NFS

h.I have been scoring docs etcit would not surprise me... Can any of the dev guys possibly elaborate? BTW Mike, I finally gave up on making 4.x work with centos and just used ubuntuit worked like a charm. So I can only guess that something is up with the newer versions of CS w

RE: VMware and NFS

> -Original Message- > From: Michael Phillips [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 21 February 2014 09:59 > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: VMware and NFS > > h.I have been scoring docs etcit would not surprise me... > Can any of the dev guys possibly elabo

RE: VMware and NFS

> -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 21 February 2014 09:54 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: VMware and NFS > > Yes, the hypervisor does need to mount the NFS share, but I seem to remember > there being something unusual a

  1   2   >