Hi Sébastien.
2012/11/28 Phil Steitz p...@steitz.com
On 11/27/12 3:43 PM, er...@apache.org wrote:
Author: erans
Date: Tue Nov 27 23:43:06 2012
New Revision: 1414470
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1414470view=rev
Log:
Contents for the release notes.
Hi Gilles,
I thought that you were almost finished with the Beta function.
How much time would you need to resolve the issue?
I thought so too. The code is written, but I've noticed that a few changes
must be done. And I have to decide what is the best place for all these
auxiliary
Hi.
I thought that you were almost finished with the Beta function.
How much time would you need to resolve the issue?
I thought so too. The code is written, but I've noticed that a few changes
must be done. And I have to decide what is the best place for all these
auxiliary
Hi,
2012/11/28 Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org
Hi.
I thought that you were almost finished with the Beta function.
How much time would you need to resolve the issue?
I thought so too. The code is written, but I've noticed that a few
changes
must be done. And I
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 06:05:13PM -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 11/27/12 1:24 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 11/27/2012 04:30 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
Hello.
Quoting from the previous thread about this subject:
As far as I am concerned, 3.1 could be released anytime now.
[Luc
Hi all,
As long as I've been part of the Commons community I don't know that I've
encountered this exact situation: a committer adds some code to the
sandbox that is more or less complete. I don't know precisely what
requirements must be met before we promote [privilizer] to proper. We seem
to
Another aspect to consider is would this new privalizer component (not
crazy about the name ATM) fit in an existing Commons component?
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
As long as I've been part of the Commons community I don't know that I've
Hi Gary,
Feel free to suggest one or more alternate names, and we can vote on
them! The intent is to quickly convey that the component equips your code
to run in a Java security constrained environment, thus privilizer or
that which makes your code privileged. Since the main use of the
Pretty sure you didn't intend to drop the list; adding back. ;) Using
BCEL to do the dirty work could be an option, though I confess I wouldn't
mind seeing that done for a v1.1. The
codebase-formerly-known-as-privileged-method-weaver feels as much to me
like part of the current BCEL as a
+1
It might fit to any component which does _not_ introduce a runtime dependency
but is only needed at compile time. Basically the privilizer is kind of a
preprocessor.
If such a kind of component already exists in commons, then we can look if it
fits to the business of this component.
FWIW, Simone and I had, in the past, discussed privately whether some tree
of post-compilation tools might make a sensible family of commons component
modules. We had originally been thinking along the lines of JDK6
annotation processors, which [*privilizer] is not (no open API exists
allowing
On 11/28/12 12:44 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
Hi all,
As long as I've been part of the Commons community I don't know that I've
encountered this exact situation: a committer adds some code to the
sandbox that is more or less complete. I don't know precisely what
requirements must be met before
Apologies for the cross-post. Please respond to just the dev list.
I am going to do a talk on Commons Math at Apachecon US in Portland
next February. One of the things I want to do in the talk is to
present some examples of practical use of the library. I would love
to get some examples from
Hi Phil,
I use various parts of Commons Math (CM) for a program I created for
psychometrics called jMetrik, www.ItemAnalysis.com. It does a variety of
statistical procedures from basic descriptive statistics to item response
theory and test equating. jMetrik has a fairly large international user
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
The Apache Commons Daemon team is pleased to announce the
commons-daemon-1.0.11 release!
Version 1.0.11 is bug fix release fixing various issues
found in 1.0.10 release.
Source and binary distributions are available for download
from the Apache Commons download site:
Huh, obviously a typo in the @subject :(
It should have been '[ANN] Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.11 released'
Should I post another one with the correct @subject?
Regards
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-chain2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbutils has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
21 matches
Mail list logo
