As a consumer, I would prefer all java version changes to be considered
major breaking changes for all apache commons components.
I've waste lots of hours trying to find the oldest released version that
supports a specific java version as the project can't yet upgrade for
various reasons.
On Sun,
That would probably need to be a major release as it would break backwards
compatibility for other consumers.
I don't know the roadmap for fileupload but I would suggest raising a jira
ticket for this new feature request.
Looking at Tomcat 10.x it appears to be Servlet 5.0 specification which is
e
Evening,
Could someone approve my PR's workflow as still 1st time contributor for
vfs. If they pass they are read for review and potential merge.
Upgrades all the easy tests to JUnit v5
https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/240
Extracts test methods out of AbstractVfsTestCase, and also dele
So wanted to update commons-jelly.
It's using travis and the default distro won't allow Java 1.7 to be
installed. So raised PR https://github.com/apache/commons-jelly/pull/8 to
fix that.
Now the build starts but I think due to Java 1.5 being the source and
target it's got another issue with DataS
If they are my PR's they cover;
) @Test(expected=xxx.class) to using assertThrows
) trying to use assertAll
) removing unused imports
As I've been having issues with large PR changes, I've been trying to do
smaller PR's with a single item, or test being changed.
John
On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 at 05:3
if there is no such rule, some bad guys can create 100 accounts
> >> and drain every open-source repo's github actions account.
> >>
> >> 2. some repos using github actions with cache, and use it to auto-deploy
> >>
> >> which means there is
so wanted to try and help out but unable to as pr won't build until it's
approved by maintainer.
from what i can tell it should have worked. tried that branch and master
and both pass locally
tried to kick off another build to see if just false failed build, so
created new branch but it linked to p
snyk just looks at security issues, not all avaliable updates.
i see dependabot (personally use renovate bot as dependabot has a broken
security mode regarding forks, as you can't disable dependabot on a fork),
as pro-actively upgrading dependencies, so the older dependency with a
security issue i
at least java 8, and
then spend my time upgrade unit tests to junit v5 jupiter.
But I might try that next year or the year after, after all we are only 3
years away from the Java 23 LTS.
John
On Wed, 8 Sept 2021 at 23:47, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Le mer. 8 sept. 202
Hi,
Could someone look at this pr's, some coming up to a year open.
Dependabot, adding the commons standard.
https://github.com/apache/commons-jci/pull/3
https://github.com/apache/commons-jelly/pull/7
https://github.com/apache/commons-jxpath/pull/21
https://github.com/apache/commons-math/pull/160
e tried to do a seamless upgrade, or suggest a roadmap, but haven't got
anywhere, but think I might just raise a JEP to drop 1.8 in Java 18...
John
On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 14:07, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Le jeu. 10 juin 2021 à 14:42, John Patrick a
> écrit :
> >
> > If th
If the tests are valid and useful once post Java 1.8, what about
starting the next release branch where the min version bumps to Java
11.
As Java 17 starting ramp down starts today I believe so in 3 months we
will have 3 LTS (1.8, 11 and 17) releases. So technically Java 18
development starts tomor
Have you tried "9" instead of "1.9"?
I believe the 1.x was dropped with Java 9's release.
Also might want to bump it to Java 11 as that is a LTS release, as 9
was only supported for 6 months from september 2017 to march 2018.
Also with 9 and newer, maven.compiler.source/maven.compiler.target
have
Some customers might need to use Java 7, but what about the customers
who want to use it on Java 17 which will be in rampdown in 5 months
and released in 6 months?
Also from memory from conferences ~ 2018/2019 I thought Java 17 was
planning on removing the Classpath so everything needed to be Modul
What version of java is the command line maven using and what is
intellij using for;
1. Settings -> "Build, Execution, Deployment" -> "Build Tools" ->
Maven -> Importing -> "JDK for importer"
2. Settings -> "Build, Execution, Deployment" -> "Build Tools" ->
Maven -> Runner -> "JDK for importer"
3.
Just spotted an issue with maven enforcer and JDK 15, not related to
Java 15 issues but missing setup.
Anyone aware of an issue with NODE_NAME = jenkins-win-he-de-2? as when
it's doing the build windows-jdk15-m3.6.x_build it fails with the
error below;
f:\jenkins\jenkins-slave\712657a4\workspace\
Rony,
Check emails that I started or replied too, from 1st March 2020
onwards. Probably up to about 10 separate email chains covering
dependabot, java 1.6/1.7/8/11+, junit 4.13, junit jupiter, getting
repo's in sync.
So I wasn't raising pr's blindly, I was doing them in conjunction with
email conve
Standard steps for a Maven project in IntelliJ...
a.k.a. open maven pom.xml in IntelliJ as a project.
You should see a "Maven" tab and inside that tab see "Apache Commons Lang".
Then expand commons-lang->src->test->java->org.apache.commons.lang3.
Then right click or secondary click on the folde
You'll have to build it yourself probably, I'm guessing 'c12260c'
relates to the hash, so to this specific commit;
'''
commit c12260c05ebcd27558265395df79b8b049534fbd
Author: Gary Gregory
Date: Wed Dec 18 15:28:13 2019 -0500
Remove trailing white spaces on all lines.
'''
Like you said your
commons-digester and commons-validator.
Will look at vfs and maybe also rng regarding tidying up the tests etc.
John
On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 13:06, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> Le mer. 14 oct. 2020 à 21:41, John Patrick a écrit :
> >
> > before i waste time looking
le or @Test(expected)
> >
> > If both points are matched it makes sense to me, otherwise it will likely
> > add more issues from my experience.
> >
> >
> > Le mer. 14 oct. 2020 à 21:40, John Patrick a
> > écrit :
> >
> > > before i waste time
before i waste time looking at upgrading tests...
any objections if i upgrade tests to use assertAll and assertThrows
introduced in JUnit jupiter?
I see it as less tech debt removal and I'm happy to spend time doing
the upgrade which I've done from maybe several projects now. Just
don't want to g
to shortcut multiple people telling me not to manually raise pr's to
upgrade dependencies, and dependabot is the preferred option for
commons to be raising these upgrades, and i should raise a pr to
enable dependabot.
so... here are all the pr's to enable dependabot on the repo's which
lack a depe
hi,
is someone able to review this pr please.
https://github.com/apache/commons-chain/pull/3
It's the last commons project that doesn't have a .gitignore file. My
other pr's adding a .gitignore have either been merged or someone
noticed and added one themselves.
cheers,
john
---
On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 at 14:16, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 9:11 AM Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> > Git submodules are pointers to other git commits. Therefore, any component
> > changes made don’t affect the mono repo until you update said mono repo to
> > point to the new commit. If
I've now closed all PR's, and deleted the source branches.
Giles I've pushed the changes back into my commons-lang fork, so this
would recreate that branch
https://github.com/nhojpatrick/apache_commons-lang/pull/new/takari.maven-wrapper.
The PR if raised again, would include changes needed for gi
not doable but it is surely saner for a widely used OS project to
> stick to "standard" for things outside the scope of the project itself.
> That said a java GH Action SDK can be nice - but would likely still call
> node as of today :s.
>
>
> > I am leaning toward having o
I wonder if openjdk has considered all the auto generated traffic that
might be triggered from github. As for JDK 16 they are moving from
Mercurial to Git, and moving from internal hosting to Github. I guess
we will know shortly as ramp down for JDK 16 will start something in
december.
Having seen
ding its .github folder which means you
> > therefore asked for the Dependabot to run since its configuration file is
> > there.
> >
> > Obviously if you do not want Dependabot to run, then just disable it
> > (remove the file)
> >
> > Gary
> >
> >
>
Personally I wouldn't use GitHub Actions, it seems wrong coupling
yourself to what is hosting your code. I'm not saying anything is
wrong with GitHub Actions it just feels like vendor lock in.
When you say pushing SNAPSHOT to github.io would that be a nightly or
weekly or merge triggered releases?
What if you're wanting to use it on Java 14, 15 RC, 16 EA or in 6
months time 17 EA, will they support such an old version?
Reading the website;
Tomcat 7 needs Java 6 and later and (Java 7 for WebSockets),
Tomcat 8 is Java 7 and later
Tomcat 9 is Java 8 and later
Tomcat 10 is Java 8 and later
They
I've raised some pull requests to add the Takari maven wrapper.
The Takari maven wrapper is EOL and will be replaced with the Maven
Wrapper when Maven v3.7.0 is released.
I've added the Takari version as maven v3.7.0 is not yet out. I've
been using the Takari maven wrapper for about 4 years now a
ps://github.com/apache/commons-lang) project.
As I say, I totally understanding about getting emails regarding
dependabot as it's been authorised on the
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang project.
John
On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 at 23:54, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Le sam. 15
I've just noticed a load of pull requests that have been auto created
by dependabot, for changes to be merged into my forked version of
master.
For commons-lang I've 20 PR's, commons-logging 10 PR's, I've not
checked all the other commons forks I've got.
They are getting automatically closed once
I keep thinking that too, and ended up just using a custom versions
rule to ignore it.
Other idea maybe change to GAV to;
1) org.apache.commons:commons-io
2) org.apache.commons:commons-io2
So starting to match the commons-lang3 approach.
I find commons-lang3 is a really good pattern and is much
s 2020 à 18:00, John Patrick a écrit :
>
> > Romain, The 4 commons projects I'm referring to already have
> > Automatic-Module-Name in the Manifest, if that is what you mean by
> > "explicit module name in the manifest".
> >
> > I've been
d jar "jpms" at the same time than current
> > default jar to propose jpms integration early (worse case)?
> >
> > Alternative to just have an explicit module name in the manifest but no
> > module-info also sounds safer to me and still enables to use jpms.
> >
&g
I'm wanting to correctly use Collections and Lang as Java Modules.
Looking at the dependencies, I'll need to tackle all four projects.
I'm planning on doing the following as if I'm touching the projects I
might as well help out;
1) spring clean .gitignore, each project has different list, some
do
right?
>
> sebb 于2019年10月10日周四 上午6:55写道：
>>
>>> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 22:38, John Patrick wrote:
>>>
>>> Regarding the question, it was by Simon Ritter (Azul Systems
>>> previously Oracle previously Sun). "Put your hand up if your running
>
Regarding the question, it was by Simon Ritter (Azul Systems
previously Oracle previously Sun). "Put your hand up if your running
applications in production using Java X", started with Java 8, then
asked about 11, then 12 and 13, then asked 7 and then 6. Not sure if
he said Java 5 but I don't think
What about Java 5 to 8.
I'm current sat at Jax London and was the sole person who put their
hand up for Java 6, and next Conference I hope to have migrated
everything to at least Java 8. From the rest I saw 1 hand being raised
for Java 7, about 2/3rd's said Java 8 and 1/3rd said Java 11, with a
han
On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 08:54, sebb wrote:
>
> On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 07:59, Jochen Wiedmann
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have studied EMAIL-186. My impression is, that all commons jar files
> > should provide a fixed module name, rather than trusting in the choice
> > of the JDK. Thus, it seems
Personally as a consumer/user I wouldn't expect a minor update to bump
the min java version required, I would expect a major version number
bump.
Also I think all commons projects should be bumped to Java 8 asap, as
those on java 5, 6 or 7 are probably happy with the current versions
and would onl
i've experience the same, a build about ~75 and another around ~95
introduced from the limited versions I've tested introduced some
dramatic performance and memory improvements
i think one was around streams and the other around lambdas
but that is also about u40 was April 14, 2015, and u121 was
ement at the moment but having to do several if/else if/else
blocks to get it working as needed.
Cheers,
John
On 14 October 2016 at 00:26, Gilles wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 15:57:00 +0100, John Patrick wrote:
>>
>> I've posted a message to the users list, bu
I've posted a message to the users list, but on reflecting I think
what I'm trying to achieve might be beyond commons-cli current
ability.
If I fork and work on adding nested OptionGroup's, would it stand a
change of being merged?
Is it a feature you want to support/provide?
I want to check with
After reading more about the proposed changes, I am now comfortable with
dividing the library into separate components. However, I have two
concerns. First, a package or class that passes unit tests should not be
abandoned or depricated just because there is no one to support it. It
should only be
o more to sustain CM.
Thanks,
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: Jörg Schaible [mailto:joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com]
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 6:20 AM
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Math] Commons Math (r)evolution
Hi Gilles,
Gilles wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2016
The Apache commons math library already has a reputation and is well kvown.
Any name that does not involve the words Apache and math will require a lot
of rebranding or years of explaining to people that the TLP named X is
really just the library formerly known as commons math. Removing "commons"
f
Apache Math
-Original Message-
From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2016 12:07 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: [math] [POLL] new TLP name
Please select your top choice among the following suggested names for the new
[math]-based TLP. All a
I have a requirement to be able to get the standard error for a predicted y
value for a given x value. I believe that adding a generalisation of
getInterceptStdErr() to SimpleRegression as detailed in the feature
description of [MATH-1260] would do the trick. Ad hoc experimentation with
exposing xb
There are various ways to compute percentiles and statistical programs use
different methods by default. I would prefer that we do like R and provide
multiple options for the type of percentile computation. See
http://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-patched/library/stats/html/quantile.html
Patrick
+1
-Original Message-
From: Luc Maisonobe [mailto:l...@spaceroots.org]
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2014 5:56 AM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Release Math 3.3 based on RC3 (second run after mail outage)
Hi all,
As I am not sure this message will be recovered after mail outage, I
+1
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Neidhart [mailto:thomas.neidh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 1, 2014 12:16 PM
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Math 3.3 based on RC2
Hi all,
I would like to call a vote to release Commons Math 3.3 based on RC2.
Changes since RC1:
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Gilles [mailto:gil...@harfang.homelinux.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 6:21 PM
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Math 3.3 based on RC1
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 09:30:37 -0400, Patrick Meyer wrote:
> MATH-1092 appear to be unresol
MATH-1092 appear to be unresolved but a path was submitted. Is it possible
to include this patch in 3.3?
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Neidhart [mailto:thomas.neidh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 4:08 PM
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Math 3.3 based on
nding singular vectors are also valid singular vectors.
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 4:09 AM, Patrick Meyer wrote:
> Thanks Ted. As I mentioned my knowledge of SVD is limited, and I was
> not aware that it is OK to have a different order of the first two
> columns in the results (or the co
s that the order of the corresponding left and right
singular vectors are different and there are sign changes in the singular
vectors.
My guess is that you will get the same results in Apache Commons Math.
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Patrick Meyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am
Hi,
I am using the SingularValueDecomposition class with a matrix but it gives
me a different result than R. My knowledge of SVD is limited, so any advice
is welcomed.
Here's the method in Java
public void svdTest(){
double[][] x = {
{1.0, -0.05307180786272
GitHub user patrick-a-cavanaugh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/13
Update ImmutablePair to be not final
The sibling class MutablePair is not final, and the JavaDoc for
ImmutablePair also states it is not final: "The class is also not {@code
My vote was not directed toward the technical merits of the optimization
package. I am not an expert on optimization and I trust you in this regard.
My vote was a comment on the usability of the API. I find it to be
increasing difficult to use.
Maybe I have missed some refactoring, but why all
>You have done a pretty good job in making the optimization package
non-sensical to user.
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
de (that has to be
recoded with every release of CM). It's frustrating.
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: Gilles Sadowski [mailto:gil...@harfang.homelinux.org]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 8:29 PM
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: [Math] Remove "BOBYQAOptimizer"
Hell
g for
source code for numerical optimization. I'm happy to help out. Let me know
if you would like more information.
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 8:01 PM
To: Commons Developers List; Commons Users Li
rd wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2012/11/8 Gilles Sadowski :
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 09:39:00AM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>>>>>>>>&g
I misunderstood an earlier email and I though the compute method was public. It
seems that adding a public compute method may be more complication and effort
than it is worth. My apologies for the misunderstanding. The compute method
would only be of value if it can be an easy addition.
-O
d use the nonmissing data array
in my calculations. It may be a bit clunky, but it's one of the ways I
handle missing data without looping over the database twice. I don't have a
solution for comprehensive treatment of missing data yet, but I appreciate
the conversation we are h
Please keep ResizeableDoubleArray as its own class. I find it very useful
for more than descriptive statistics. I do like the idea of adding an apply
method to it.
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 1:23 PM
To
-0400, Patrick Meyer wrote:
> I vote for simplicity. Current practice in the social sciences is to
> fit multiple models, each with a different number of components, and
> use fit statistics to choose the best model.
So... Do you vote for the current proposal (as in the latest attachment on
I vote for simplicity. Current practice in the social sciences is to fit
multiple models, each with a different number of components, and use fit
statistics to choose the best model.
There are some additional features I would like to see added and I have the
code to contribute if it is not curren
Looks great, thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Neidhart [mailto:thomas.neidh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 2:28 PM
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Math] Toward releasing 3.0 ?
On 02/15/2012 02:41 PM, Patrick Meyer wrote:
> OK, I submited a patch t
OK, I submited a patch that includes comments and documentation. Let me know
if I need to write more, but I think I've covered the functionality of the
classes.
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: Gilles Sadowski [mailto:gil...@harfang.homelinux.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012
I can document the StorelessCovariance addition. What is the best way to add
documentation? Do I just add comments to the file and create a patch?
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Neidhart [mailto:thomas.neidh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 9:21 AM
To: dev@commons.apache.or
Ha ha... I was really hoping someone else would do all the hard work and
write the MVN distribution function for me.
On 9/3/2011 1:53 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 9/3/11 10:37 AM, Patrick Meyer wrote:
No, I have written very few tests. Until I recently discovered
jUnit, I was using a very crude
I use the one from
http://vadim.kutsyy.com/java/javadoc/com/kutsyy/util/package-summary.html Are
there plans to add a multivaraite normal CDF function to commons math?
Patrick
On 9/3/2011 12:36 PM, Greg Sterijevski wrote:
Do you have unit tests written for the different components?
On Sat,
/11 7:19 AM, Patrick Meyer wrote:
Yes, the math code is separate from the GUI and database for the
most part. I'd be happy to share the code and documentation, but I
need a few days to add it to a repository and get it online.
There are parts of my library that can be transferred to math wit
parts that need more work to make it more object
oriented in style and less procedural. In any case, I'll send
information about the code once I have it online.
Patrick
On 9/2/2011 9:26 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
Hello.
I have been developing an pure Java application that does a
Hi All,
I have been developing an pure Java application that does a variety of
psychometric methods. I use the commons math library as much as I can
but I've also had to develop my own library. I'd like to combine the two
libraries by donating as much of my code to commons math as I can. My
l
is an excellent community edition and
Apache committers can get a full version.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Patrick Meyer wrote:
OK, after fidgeting with NetBeans for too long without results, I went with
Phil's suggestion and just used subversion at the command prompt. It was
much e
. The tolerance was not
changed for the Swiss data. It remained 10E-13 for the Swiss data.
The one-pass algorithm is described in a paper by Pebay (2008)
http://prod.sandia.gov/techlib/access-control.cgi/2008/086212.pdf
Thanks for everyone's help.
Patrick
On 8/17/2011 12:13 PM, Patrick w
in method that is not native or
abstract in class file org/apache/commons/math/TestUtils"
Any help would be appreciated. I have a lot to contribute to commons
math but my lack of experience with subversion is really hindering me.
in method that is not native or
abstract in class file org/apache/commons/math/TestUtils"
Any help would be appreciated. I have a lot to contribute to commons
math but my lack of experience with subversion is really hindering me.
Thanks for the information Luc. I didn't know those existed. I'm happy
to keep the discussion at the implementation levels.
On 8/12/2011 6:23 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 12/08/2011 00:30, Patrick Meyer a écrit :
I like the idea of adding this feature. What about an abstract
I like the idea of adding this feature. What about an abstract class
that implements DifferentiableMultivariateRealFunction and provides the
method for partialDerivative (). People could then override the
partialDerivative method if they have an analytic derivative.
Here's some code that I'm h
Thanks. I think my problem may be an IDE issue. In Eclipse, I had no luck
using New > Java Class, but I was able to use New > File. Is that normal?
Sorry for the simple questions, but I really appreciate your help.
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Gilles Sadowski <
gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wro
Excuse my typo, I meant to say if it is possible to add new classes via
SUBVERSION, not substance. As I am new to subversion it seems that only
patches for existing classes are possible.
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Patrick Meyer wrote:
> Is it possible to add new classes via substa
Is it possible to add new classes via substance patches? I have a storeless
covariance class and other classes I would like to contribute.
Thanks,
Patrick
Ted and Sebb,
Thanks for all of the help! I look forward to submitting more contributions.
Thanks,
Patrick
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e
this
latest file is what you need.
Thanks,
Patrick
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>
ight eventually.)
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> How did you create this diff?
>
> The normal way is to use svn diff in the project root directory.
>
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Patrick Meyer wrote:
>
> > OK, I attached a diff file to,
> &g
ure I am using
he right process to submit changes.
Thanks,
Patrick
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> If you provide a suggested patch, this will go forward much more quickly
> than
> if you wait for a volunteer to appear out of the mists.
>
> It is after al
ed to org.apache.commons.math.covariance.
Thanks,
Patrick
I have a small feature request for the org.apache.commons.math.stat
Frequency class. It is often useful to know the unique number of elements in
a frequency table. Would you add this feature? I submitted an issue with
JIRA with the code needed to make this happen,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/bro
93 matches
Mail list logo
