-Original Message-
From: Luc Maisonobe
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 1:40 AM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [math] Problems with sparse implementations of RealVector
Hi Sébastien,
Le 18/06/2012 08:11, Sébastien Brisard a écrit :
Dear all,
in this thread,
And, it is much worse than that. Pretty much nobody cares about ebe, but
dotProduct and outerProduct also assume that 0*NaN = 0 and 0*+-Infinity = 0.
e.g.:
RealVector a = new OpenMapRealVector(10);
RealVector b = new OpenMapRealVector(10);
a.setEntry(1, 1.0);
b.setEntry(2,
I'm going to remain blissfully ignorant about the problems you are having
with Maven. But Gump is using the Ant build for this project (you can change
it to use the Maven build if you like). But anything you do with deploying
in Maven won't change what Gump sees with the current configuration.
-Original Message-
From: Gary Gregory
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 6:15 AM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1326609 - in /commons/proper/io/trunk/src:
changes/changes.xml main/java/org/apache/commons/io/FileUtils.java
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:38 AM, Stefan
-Original Message-
From: JörgSchaible
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 6:54 AM
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1326609 - in /commons/proper/io/trunk/src:
changes/changes.xml main/java/org/apache/commons/io/FileUtils.java
Bill Barker wrote:
-Original Message
I'm not involved with [POOL] (so this is mostly from the peanut gallery),
but do strongly think that logging should be minimal for such a low level
component. As such, if there needs to be any logging at all, it should use
JUL. While it would be nice in a development environment so see my bone
While the development team has exploded for [MATH], maintaining Serializable
interfaces is expensive and historically hasn't been kept up. So I would go
for requiring the user to do something like:
public class MyPolynomialSplineFunction extends PolynomialSplineFunction,
implements
IMNAL, but it seems to be a basically badly worded basically BSD license.
The main problems I see is that it is missing the words 'irrevocable' and
'perpetual' in the language. The correct place would probably be
legal-discuss@a.o.
An ICLA wouldn't help. Getting a grant or getting an
Give it up. Personally I wouldn't use any project that has a non-conditional
dependency on com.sun.**. Locking a project into one version of one
proprietary vendors implementation is the opposite of what Open Source is
supposed to be about. For a long time, Tomcat had a conditional dependency
-Original Message-
From: Konstantin Kolinko
Sent: Sunday, December 25, 2011 1:15 AM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [pool] [POOL-208] Support Java 1.5 Generics in version 1.x.
2011/12/23 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Phil Steitz
Thank you for the documentation. There is admittedly a lack of
documentation currently for [modeler], and every bit helps. I'm more used
to seeing using metadata to load the MBeans in [modeler] (like Tomcat does,
and Jetty at least used to do, since haven't looked at Jetty in awhile). But
I
I'd be interested in reviewing any number theory additions to [math]. It
seems that the project has grown enough that it can branch out into number
theory as well.
-Original Message-
From: Pyniak, Karol
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 5:07 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject:
I'm in favor of moving some methods to the SparseXXX interface, but got
voted down at the time. For application developers (like me), that can
expect in advance if the Vector/Matrix is sparse or not it isn't a big deal.
But I can see how it may cause problems for other libraries that want to
-Original Message-
From: Gilles Sadowski
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 3:12 PM
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Math - 403] Never propagate a NullPointerException resulting
from bad usage of the API
Hi.
It's a debate that goes on. Josh Bloch in his Effective Java book
--
From: Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, December 26, 2010 10:43 AM
To: Apache Commons Developers List commons-...@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: [math] Getting 2.2 out (or, Santa nous a laissé le charbon, mais
peut-être par la
--
From: er...@apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 6:46 AM
To: comm...@commons.apache.org
Subject: svn commit: r1030464 [1/3] - in /commons/proper/math/trunk/src:
main/java/org/apache/commons/math/
--
From: Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 3:46 AM
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: [Math] Package for UnivariateRealFunctions
Hi.
What do you think of creating a function package that would
--
From: Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 12:57 AM
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.4 based on RC1
Hi,
Commons Daemon 1.0.4 RC1 release is available for testing
Yes, GUMP is running 1.6.0_18 OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.8.1)
(6b18-1.8.1-0ubuntu1) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 16.0-b13, mixed mode)
You can find it at http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/index.html
--
From: Phil Steitz
--
From: dim...@apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 8:55 AM
To: comm...@commons.apache.org
Subject: svn commit: r984453 -
/commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math/util/MathUtils.java
Author: dimpbx
Date: Wed Aug
--
From: Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 3:34 AM
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Math] Usage of NullPointerException
Gilles Sadowski wrote:
The added value that I see is that an
--
From: Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 2:27 PM
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Math] Usage of NullPointerException
A simpler policy would be to not check for null and let the JVM do
it.
--
From: Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 4:13 AM
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.3 based on RC3
Hi,
I'm back :)
Almost six months after 1.0.3.RC2 attempt, but been
--
From: Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 5:42 PM
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: clirr for MATH-389
Gilles Sadowski wrote:
Intentional but still a mistake IMO ;-) as it's part of the
--
From: Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:37 AM
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-math (in module apache-commons)
failed
Le 15/06/2010 10:28, Gump
--
From: Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 1:11 PM
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Math] Help in debugging process
From a user's point of view logging is a waste of time if it doesn't
--
From: Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com
Sent: Saturday, May 08, 2010 9:14 PM
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Math] Request more Jira karma
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Bill Barker billwbar...@verizon.net
--
From: Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 5:09 AM
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: [Math] NaN in equals
Hello.
In the MathUtils class, equals methods consider that a NaN is equal to
a
NaN. It seems
At the moment I have minimal permissions for Jira in [math]. In particular
I can't resolve issues, so it leads to a reluctance to work on them if I
have to rely on someone else to resolve them. So would like to ask for more
karma. My Jira user name is the same as my Apache id.
--
From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 4:57 PM
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Math] What about issue 361?
On 27/04/2010, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
There
--
From: Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 8:31 PM
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3
Tag:
--
From: Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2010 5:27 PM
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: [math] releasing 2.1 - compatibility breaks, site build failure
I have completed all of the code / doco
18.03.2010 08:47, schrieb Bill Barker:
--
From: Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 2:20 PM
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test
--
From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 3:57 PM
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: [DAEMON] Procrun Java mode usage
I've got a sample jvm mode service running OK, and am now trying to
understand how
--
From: Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 2:20 PM
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module
apache-commons) failed
This
--
From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 1:18 PM
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DAEMON] Procrun documentation
On 18/03/2010, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
On 03/18/2010 08:13 PM, sebb
--
From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 12:53 PM
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DAEMON] Site documentation
On 17/03/2010, Bill Barker billwbar...@verizon.net wrote
--
From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 11:46 AM
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: [DAEMON] Site documentation
The binaries page:
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/daemon/site/binaries.html
mentions
--
From: Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 11:45 AM
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.3 based on RC2
On 03/16/2010 07:17 PM, ebb wrote:
There's a problem with the Manifests in the source
--
From: Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 12:16 AM
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: [DAEMON] TR 1.0.3
Hi,
There are couple of bug fixes and few features added.
I'm currently working on fixing
--
From: jean-frederic clere jfcl...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 11:48 PM
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC2
On 02/23/2010 09:02 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Daemon RC2 fixes some
--
From: Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 1:30 AM
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC2
On 24/02/2010 09:05, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Wed,
--
From: Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 4:08 AM
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC2
On 02/23/2010 01:04 PM, sebb wrote:
On 23/02/2010,
--
From: Julius Davies juliusdav...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 8:52 PM
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: [codec] gump failure
What's this about? Is this something we should take seriously?
Forgive me,
--
From: Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 10:05 PM
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r915668 - in
/commons/proper/daemon/trunk/src/native/nt: Makefile moni/Makefile
service/Makefile
On 02/24/2010
/Makefile
On 02/24/2010 07:25 AM, Bill Barker wrote:
I think that we should declare this [VOTE] a
failure, and anyone that wants commons-daemon can get it from SVN.
Not necessarily.
We need 3 +1 votes more then there are -1 votes.
It's a release and release voting cannot be vetoed.
It's just
--
From: Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 12:02 AM
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC2
Daemon RC2 fixes some minor distribution issues over the
--
From: Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 5:58 PM
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC1
Mladen Turk wrote:
After a long time and many
--
From: Bill Barker billwbar...@verizon.net
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 7:51 PM
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC1
--
From: Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org
Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 11:56 PM
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC1
After a long time and many bug fixes we have new
--
From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 6:40 PM
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC1
On 21/02/2010, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
After a
--
From: Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 5:43 AM
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-daemon (in module
apache-commons) failed
On 02/18/2010 02:34 PM,
Submitting patches in diff -u format helps a lot for committers to
evaluate. It doesn't look bad (but haven't run test on it) on a 5min
review, but it will take a lot longer review before I can agree to commit
the changes (just on weeding out what hasn't changed).
--
From: Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 11:26 AM
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [math] Work going on on SVD
Luc Maisonobe a écrit :
Dimitri Pourbaix a écrit :
Hi,
Hi
/AbstractRealVector.javasite/xdoc/changes.xml
test/java/org/apache/commons/math/linear/ArrayRealVectorTest.java
Bill Barker a écrit :
--
From: Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 12:14 PM
To: Commons Developers
--
From: Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 12:14 PM
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r904231 - in
--
From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 6:21 AM
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: [MATH] Remove unnecessary suite() methods from test classes?
There are a lot of src/test classes that contain a
- Original Message -
From: Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, December 12, 2009 11:17 AM
Subject: Re: [math] getting changes included into commons-math (was Re:
Homefor the colt fork)
MATH-312, 314, 316 and 317 were
There are some things I don't like about this, but will try to find the time
to fix them myself . Comments inline (and I can't veto anything in [math],
so these are just suggestions).
- Original Message -
From: l...@apache.org
To: comm...@commons.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, December
- Original Message -
From: Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: [math] Questions about the linear package
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:55 AM, luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
we would
- Original Message -
From: Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 6:18 PM
Subject: [math] new checkstyle rules
I would like to add checks for
1) System.out.println() statements in the code
2) Trailing
- Original Message -
From: pste...@apache.org
To: comm...@commons.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2009 2:43 PM
Subject: svn commit: r799933 -
/commons/proper/math/trunk/src/site/xdoc/xdoc.xsl
Author: psteitz
Date: Sat Aug 1 21:43:45 2009
New Revision: 799933
URL:
- Original Message -
From: Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 4:55 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Release Math 2.0
The release distributions are here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC3/
The tag
- Original Message -
From: Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2009 2:57 PM
Subject: [math] 2.0 RC1 available for review
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC1/
Looks good to me.
- Original Message -
From: Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, July 05, 2009 9:22 AM
Subject: [math] freezing current state for release ?
Hello all,
I am still struggling to implement properly an efficient Backward
- Original Message -
From: Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 12:14 PM
Subject: [math] reviewing the current state on serialization
Hello,
I have reviewed the current state of serialization within
- Original Message -
From: Bill Barker billwbar...@verizon.net
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 3:14 PM
Subject: Re: [math] reviewing the current state on serialization
- Original Message -
From: Luc Maisonobe luc.maison
On 19/06/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
- Bill Barker billwbar...@verizon.net a écrit :
- Original Message - From: luc.maison...@free.fr
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 2:58 PM
- Original Message -
From: luc.maison...@free.fr
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 2:58 PM
Subject: Re: svn commit: r785552 - in /commons/proper/math/trunk/src:
java/org/apache/commons/math/complex/Complex.java site/xdoc/changes.xml
- Original Message -
From: Paul Libbrecht p...@activemath.org
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2009 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: [jexl] Remove Maven 1 support from 2.0 branch?
Won't this break anything that uses Maven 1 and jexl as dependency in
it's parent UID (I think).
More importantly, I can't imagine why an abstract class like
ContinuedFraction should be serializable.
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Bill Barker
billwbar...@verizon.netwrote:
Ok, most of the rest look like transient classes (e.g. all of
linear.decomposition). So
- Original Message -
From: Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: [math] Serialization
Bill Barker a écrit :
Ok, most of the rest look like transient classes (e.g. all
it.
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Bill Barker
billwbar...@verizon.netwrote:
But again, want to ask advice before going terminator on those packages.
IMHO, we'll need to write junit tests for the ones that we leave
Serializable, since I already found (and fixed) two classes in linear
* Luc Maisonobe
+1* Henri Yandell
+1* James Carman
+1* Brent Worden
+1 Edward J. Yoon
+1* Jörg Schaible
+1 Dimitri Pourbaix (changed from -1 to +1)
+0 Ted Dunning
+0 Cyril Briquet
-0 Bill Barker
-1 Gilles Sadowski
-1* Niall Pemberton
-1* Phil Steitz (changed from +1 to -1)
So the top level package
Ok, most of the rest look like transient classes (e.g. all of
linear.decomposition). So asking for what needs to be Serialized, and what
doesn't.
- Original Message -
From: Bill Barker billwbar...@verizon.net
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, May 23
, Bill Barker
billwbar...@verizon.netwrote:
- I *strongly* urge you to remove Serializable from everything!
Please, we
did this in MTJ and it turned out to be a major pain. A more
appropriate
approach is to define a class for reading/writing Matrix Market
files.
This
can be a new feature in 2.1
key2col(long key) {
return (int) (key 0xL);
}
int key2row(long key) {
return (int) (key 32);
}
Bill Barker wrote:
I have a slight preference for leaving the markers empty until 3.0, but I
can remove them as well. But I can wait to see
.
Phil
Bill Barker wrote:
What I actually went for is to add getSparcity to the SparseRealVector
interface (should be easy to calculate in one dimension, and mostly
useful for DEBUG level logging, so stubbing it shouldn't be a problem if
not),
and getShape for the SparseRealMatrix interface
- Original Message -
From: Brent Worden brent.wor...@gmail.com
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 8:28 PM
Subject: [math] Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-math (in module
apache-commons) failed
The test failed because it couldn't
- Original Message -
From: Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 1:06 PM
Subject: [VOTE] [math] top-level package name
So let's vote on this proposal: change the top level package name on
[math] from
that returns an enum that
currently only has the value of 'Any'.
I really don't like the idea of changing the API between minor releases, so
put in place-holders for what seems to be the consensus for going forward.
Bill Barker wrote:
I'm +1 on these grounds (and, yes, that means I'm
- Original Message -
From: Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: [math] Re: commons-math, matrix-toolkits-java and consolidation
+1 on this change. Grand names like SparseRealMatrix
I've been looking over the FieldT implementations, and it looks like it's
mostly done except for FieldPolynomialT. I'm not really sure which
package this should go in, since o.a.c.m.analysis.polynomial seems to be
about Real polynomials. Any hints would be appreciated.
I could provide
- Original Message -
From: Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 6:02 PM
Subject: Re: [math] Questions on Field
luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
- Bill Barker wbar...@wilshire.com a écrit :
I've been
/linear/SparseRealVectorTest.java
Bill Barker a écrit :
- Original Message - From: l...@apache.org
To: comm...@commons.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 8:17 AM
Subject: svn commit: r766337 - in /commons/proper/math/trunk/src:
java/org/apache/commons/math/linear
Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:497ee914.7010...@gmail.com...
Bill Barker wrote:
I've been working on a SparseRealVector that implements RealVector but is
backed by OpenIntToDoubleHashMap. Unlike SparseRealMatrix, the goal is
more speed than space. Mostly
I've been working on a SparseRealVector that implements RealVector but is
backed by OpenIntToDoubleHashMap. Unlike SparseRealMatrix, the goal is more
speed than space. Mostly it is going well, but running into a few problems
where some RealVector methods are almost nonsensical for sparse
Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote in message
news:e5f9b3bc-6c90-4592-a1e3-0e906bd4b...@dslextreme.com...
I'm curious as to why the last change was made to commons-proper.xml. I
fixed the broken unit test yesterday and last night's run should have
worked. I'm not sure why it is
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote in message
news:4961bda4.4070...@apache.org...
billbar...@apache.org wrote:
Author: billbarker
Date: Sun Jan 4 17:45:12 2009
New Revision: 731405
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=731405view=rev
Log:
Only include Mac-specific files if compiling for
will agree that patches
are always welcome :).
-Jack Cai
2009/1/4 Bill Barker wbar...@wilshire.com
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote in message
news:495df12a.3010...@apache.org...
Bill Barker wrote:
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote in message
news:495cc923.5020...@apache.org...
Folks
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote in message
news:495df12a.3010...@apache.org...
Bill Barker wrote:
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote in message
news:495cc923.5020...@apache.org...
Folks,
I have been working through some Tomcat bug reports and there are a
number
of
commons-daemon
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote in message
news:495cc923.5020...@apache.org...
Folks,
I have been working through some Tomcat bug reports and there are a number
of
commons-daemon issues - eg [1] - that are also in JIRA [2]. I'd very much
like
to see these issues get fixed. It appears
Jack Cai greensi...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:5e7fd1eb0812120534o25393143hea3f761a33a63...@mail.gmail.com...
It's encouraging to hear that. Thanks so much Mark and Jean! I look
forward
to your feedbacks.
Not going to have many spare cycles until after the holidays, but maybe
could
I've recently come up with a need in my day-job for a
SparseMatrix/SparseVector implementation, so would would like to offer to
help on this project. I should still have karma for commons (my Apache id
is [EMAIL PROTECTED] for those that haven't been around since my last commons
commit. I'm
Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 6:46 AM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Gump nag messages are currently sent from lots of different mail
addresses, all of which have to be subscribed (or allowed to post) to
the dev list.
95 matches
Mail list logo
