Re: Some notes on ASF conferences.

> On Jun 10, 2024, at 7:20 AM, Claude Warren wrote: > > I originally posted the content of this note in two different slack > conversations. I have decided to combine them and place them on the > mailing list for wider distribution. > > I believe that there are two issues that are retarding

Re: VP Conferences changes

> On Nov 9, 2023, at 5:46 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > > rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote on 11/8/23 9:45 AM: > ...snip... >> I'm honestly torn as to whether this troll-y message merits a response. > > No, it didn't merit a response, but here we are anyway! 8-) > > The response feels like it's from

Re: Booth opportunity at All Things Open 2023 conference

I'll be there and could spend some time at the ASF booth. > On Jun 14, 2023, at 3:36 PM, Sharan Foga wrote: > > Hi Swapnil > > I'm planning to be there - and could help out. I wont be able to do it full > time as I might have a talk and other commitments at the event. Apart from > that I'd

Re: Back to basics: What we do @comdev

Maybe part of ComDev could be in the matchmaker aspect of connecting external people to internal groups. For example, Petri is a sort of mentoring program... Just 2c from a peanut > On Mar 16, 2023, at 11:40 AM, rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: > > Hi, folks, > > I have tried to write this email

Re: Locating the Items Needed for ASF Booth - New Orleans

I think your assumption may be incorrect. > On Aug 7, 2022, at 7:34 PM, Walter Cameron > wrote: > > I thought we were moving away from the “Apache Feather”? M has been > using a featherless ASF logo on Twitter for weeks now and I assumed > everyone was in agreement that it was a symbol of

Re: Effective ways of getting individuals funded to work on ASF projects

Tidelift's model, which expects that maintainers do have direct and almost unassailable control over a project, is not compatible with the Apache Way. Tidelift's model works well with projects in which developers and maintainers can "do stuff" without worrying about building a consensus around

Re: Thoughts on alternative communication channels for our communities

> On Feb 23, 2022, at 1:32 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > Imho the kids from today communicate more asynchroneus then the generation is > 30+ is used to. (General speaking, not just the Open Source Group activist > point of view) I'd be curious about how you think that... The generation 30+

Re: Thoughts on alternative communication channels for our communities

> On Feb 22, 2022, at 10:41 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > Very consistently, at least at Red Hat, the white men over 30 agree with my > perspective and EVERYONE ELSE thinks that more synchronous discussion venues > are preferable. > Maybe because the current generation never needed to worry

Re: Tidelift

> On Jan 12, 2022, at 10:41 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > Jim, > > While I agree with your conclusion I do disagree with how you get there. > > In your first message you seemed to think that the “self-serving nature” of > what Tidelift is doing is any different than what many companies have

Re: Tidelift

o trickle in on Apache WRT mentions in web > sites and files like readme. IOW, should structs assets remove mentions of > Tidelift? > > Gary > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022, 08:52 Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> IMO, the foundation and the project should do nothing associated with &g

Re: Tidelift

IMO, the foundation and the project should do nothing associated with this. It should neither encourage or condone it. In no way should we enter into any agreement, contract, whatever, w/ Tidelift. If Tidelift wishes to work independently and directly w/ people, that's fine. But having the ASF

Alternatives to Outreachy

Under a different hat, I am looking for alternative organizations to Outreachy which do similar things (that is, focus on D)... the reason for not engaging w/ Outreachy is 2-fold: one is that I think it best to spread responsibility and opportunity around and (2) they have some issues regarding

Re: Feathercast scheduling

I'm free... > On Mar 31, 2020, at 12:51 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > Hi, friends, > > I'm hoping to reboot Feathercast (yeah, I know, I've said this before) next > week, around the original theme of "Yeah, but what does it *DO*?" that we > used to do in the old days. > > To that end, I have a

Re: ALC, and who can speak on behalf of Apache

> On Dec 5, 2019, at 3:52 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > > Picking up on one point > > On 05/12/2019 05:31, Swapnil M Mane wrote: > >> -- To form an ALC, there should be at least 2 committers or 1 ASF member. > > I don't agree with this. I don't think this is acceptable. The bar for >

Re: starting up a new project

Hi Jay, Thanks for the interest in bringing your project to the ASF. The standard process for doing so is via entrance into the Apache incubator (https://incubator.apache.org). The site itself has quite good documentation on the Hows and Whys but if you need more info, don't hesitate to reach

Fwd: Organizational scaling, Internal communications

Sander's Email below, on board@, created some discussion, and after some thought I am leaning towards a couple of thoughts: o That this is an ideal job for ComDev o That this is something I'd like to volunteer to take on Think of it as an ASF school newspaper or newsletter... Comments?

Re: First-time contributor to a project, how can I help?

Understood... I would say that it is likely harder to discuss this and provide feedback whole also keeping the name of the project secret; but I also agree that keeping the name secret is *entirely* appropriate for this email and this conversation. I would suggest letting this discussion go on

Re: Focused effort on Apache Way education

t; On Jul 17, 2019, at 10:12 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Jul 17, 2019, at 12:41 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 9:20 AM Joan Touzet >> <mailto:woh...@apache.org>> wrote: >>> >>&

Re: Focused effort on Apache Way education

> On Jul 17, 2019, at 12:41 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 9:20 AM Joan Touzet <mailto:woh...@apache.org>> wrote: > >> Hey y'all, >> >> On 2019-07-17 7:53, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>>> On Jul 17, 2019, at 2:56 AM, Ber

Re: Focused effort on Apache Way education

> On Jul 17, 2019, at 2:56 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 1:11 AM Dave Fisher wrote: >> ...I’d like to see the Apache Way described like Euclidean Geometry > > I have no clue what this would look like but I'd love to see a blog > post of yours describing

Re: Focused effort on Apache Way education

> On Jul 16, 2019, at 5:21 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:52 AM Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> I think that the events of the last several months have clearly shown a lack >> of awareness, knowledge and (and some level) appreciation (adher

Re: Focused effort on Apache Way education

to the Apache > Way principles. But to understand if training will be helpful I would like > to know the entire story. > > You can share it with me directly if you want. > > Sincerely > Dmitriy Pavlov > > вт, 16 июл. 2019 г. в 20:52, Jim Jagielski : > >> I thin

Focused effort on Apache Way education

I think that the events of the last several months have clearly shown a lack of awareness, knowledge and (and some level) appreciation (adherence) to The Apache Way. It would be useful, I think, if this was a focused effort w/i the foundation. Of course, there is a lot of overlap between

Re: Why does the ASF not pay for development?

Just a FYI that we mention the what here: http://www.apache.org/foundation/governance/#other but we don't go into a lot of detail regarding the why :) > On Jun 20, 2019, at 12:27 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Ross, could you relay this to ComDev? It seems that putting som

Re: Why does the ASF not pay for development?

Ross, could you relay this to ComDev? It seems that putting some version of your writeup under the community pages would be useful, since this is moving from outside of D's area and more of a community and policy issue, in general. In order to make this easier, I've cc'ed dev@community on this.

Re: [VOTE] ComDev supports formation of D committee

I am +1 on the spin out; I am -1 on ComDev specifying a President's cmmt as the form of the spin out. > On May 4, 2019, at 6:06 PM, Myrle Krantz wrote: > > I propose that ComDev submmit the following statement to the board: > > "The ComDev PMC hereby requests that the board create a

Re: Why should D be a president's committee?

> On May 1, 2019, at 7:06 AM, Myrle Krantz wrote: > > > (Jim, this is an area you should be able to help us shine a light on, given > your extensive experience at the ASF. You are explicitly invited to > participate.) Thx for the invite but I know that any input I'd provide to be moot.

Re: Requesting the creation of a Diversity and Inclusion committee reporting to the President

> > Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> > > > From: Bertrand Delacretaz > Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 4:46:13 AM > To: divers...@apache.org > Subject: Re: Requesting the creation of a Diversity and Inclusion commi

Re: [TIME SENSITIVE] ASF at OpenExpo/Madrid?

FWIW, I was also invited to the event but due to the shortness of notice, I was unable to arrange travel in time. > On Apr 24, 2019, at 7:33 AM, Sally Khudairi wrote: > > Thanks, Kevin and Ignasi. > > Each year seems to become more compressed. The urgency associated with their > request

Re: [Discuss] Attributing contributions to commercial vendors investing in projects

> On Apr 19, 2019, at 1:06 AM, Alex Harui > wrote: > > > Lots of NOTICE files give attribution to the pre-Apache project owner. Why > not let other companies add their logo to NOTICE if it is important to them? > NOTICE has a specific reason for existence

Re: [Discuss] Attributing contributions to commercial vendors investing in projects

Another item about the below is that I think it reflects, on many many levels, the current "understanding" or "interpretation" of open source that is being perpetuated by such entities as the Linux Foundation and believed by several companies as well. I see on almost a daily basis companies

Re: [Discuss] Attributing contributions to commercial vendors investing in projects

Yes. Corporate affiliation is really immaterial, and should be. Another reason for this is that one's job may, and often does, change. Who you are, and what you do, and how you provide "value" to a project, should not and does not. To associate one's merit with one's employment means that every

Re: [Discuss] Attributing contributions to commercial vendors investing in projects

The ASF is an entity which is focused on the individual contributor... all "merit" obtained is obtained by the *contributor* and not their companies. There are some exceptions, such as the code donation of a large chunk of code: that can be, and is, "attributed" to a company. But in general,

Re: {Action by April 5] Vote on best time for the D committee discussion call

> On Apr 3, 2019, at 9:26 AM, Naomi Slater wrote: > > > as you are not the person driving the call, I don't think it is > particularly important that you don't see a rationale. our concern should > not be *how* people "should" work, but that people *can* work, and in ways > that suit them.

Re: {Action by April 5] Vote on best time for the D committee discussion call

> On Apr 3, 2019, at 8:59 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 7:57 AM Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> Consider the effort along the lines of development... all development >> needs to be done on list. > > Not all committees operate along the li

Re: {Action by April 5] Vote on best time for the D committee discussion call

My last words on the subject: > On Apr 3, 2019, at 8:46 AM, Griselda Cuevas wrote: > > It seems that the right course of action would be to prepare an agenda, > distribute it in the divers...@apache.org list and gather input from folks > who can't join. Personally, I think the right course

Re: {Action by April 5] Vote on best time for the D committee discussion call

iated. > > > I think a call will help work out quickly a document we can socialize in > the mailing list. > > > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019, 1:27 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> Can I recommend instead of a call, using the newly created >> mailing list... In ge

Re: {Action by April 5] Vote on best time for the D committee discussion call

Can I recommend instead of a call, using the newly created mailing list... In general, Apache tries to avoid the use of sync communication medium except when absolutely required. I think that esp for such a topic as D, starting the effort off using a method that inherently disenfranchises people

Re: D

t; > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019, 9:09 AM Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> Not sure how many people were around back in the day, >> but it would be good to learn whatever can be learned >> from the women@ "experiment": >> >>https:/

Re: on "meritocracy"

> On Apr 2, 2019, at 12:11 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > > The specific organizational structure does indeed seem like a moot topic. > What matters is that wherever this take place, the group is given *space and > freedom* to get some work done. I'd be fine with it being within ComDev, I'd >

D

Not sure how many people were around back in the day, but it would be good to learn whatever can be learned from the women@ "experiment": https://lists.apache.org/list.html?wo...@apache.org Cheers! - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: on "meritocracy"

I don't think anyone expects it to die, but rather that D be one of the core aspects of community development and not an effort, in and of itself. If it reaches critical mass and warrants being spun out (due to clear division of tasks between D and ComDev) then I think everyone would support that.

Re: on "meritocracy"

> On Apr 2, 2019, at 9:53 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > > > On 4/2/19 7:05 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Does it need to be its own entity? Why can't this be a task/effort under >> ComDev's control/charter? It certainly seems to fit under the >> concept of comde

Re: on "meritocracy"

IMO, this sounds like a cmmt that will defining and implementing policy... which is a board prerogative. My pref would be, if this really does need to be outside of ComDev, it be a board cmmt > On Apr 2, 2019, at 7:25 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:32 AM Bertrand Delacretaz >

Re: on "meritocracy"

Does it need to be its own entity? Why can't this be a task/effort under ComDev's control/charter? It certainly seems to fit under the concept of comdev and the people are already here... > On Apr 1, 2019, at 6:31 PM, Griselda Cuevas wrote: > > Another update. > > I'm writing the note to

Re: Building and Sustaining Inclusive Communities

If you heard on the TV that the Mayor was charged with discrimination, your first reaction would not be to assume that she is choosy about her golden mustard. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org For

Re: Building and Sustaining Inclusive Communities (was: on "meritocracy")

> On Mar 30, 2019, at 2:50 PM, Naomi Slater wrote: > > On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 at 19:23, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> >> Discrimination, by definition, is unjust, unwarranted or prejudicial. >> > > simplistic and incorrect > > discrimination, *by defin

Re: on "meritocracy"

> On Mar 30, 2019, at 2:37 PM, Naomi Slater wrote: > > On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 at 19:28, Myrle Krantz <mailto:my...@apache.org>> wrote: > >> On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 7:20 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>> On Mar 30, 2019, at

Re: Building and Sustaining Inclusive Communities (was: on "meritocracy")

omi Slater > Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2019 11:50 AM > To: dev@community.apache.org > Subject: Re: Building and Sustaining Inclusive Communities (was: on > "meritocracy") > > On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 at 19:23, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> >> Discrimination, by

Re: Building and Sustaining Inclusive Communities (was: on "meritocracy")

> On Mar 30, 2019, at 1:32 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > >> I'm not going to (intentionally) actively discriminate for or against >> anyone. But I will protect your right, as an individual, to do so as long as >> you protect my right to help you achieve the >> right balance in our broader

Re: on "meritocracy"

> On Mar 30, 2019, at 10:41 AM, Naomi Slater wrote: > > I've done a > lot of work for Apache and this is the first time I recall seeing your > name. so I hope you will excuse me for not thinking your imputation carries > much weight > Please don't go there. For the record, I've done more

Re: on "meritocracy"

> On Mar 30, 2019, at 10:25 AM, Naomi Slater wrote: > > On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 at 14:33, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > >> I would ask that this goes both ways... I think in order to get buy-in >> from everyone, instead of those who may not agree with some premise, >&g

Re: on "meritocracy"

> On Mar 30, 2019, at 10:21 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 9:33 AM Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> I would ask that this goes both ways... I think in order to get buy-in >> from everyone, instead of those who may not agree with some premise, >>

Re: on "meritocracy"

> On Mar 30, 2019, at 1:21 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > > I ask that everyone reading this far take a moment to think the above > through. It means the issues that cause us to have poor diversity are mostly > invisible to us. Therefore we assume the problem doesn't exist or isn't as > severe

Re: Establishing an Events PMC?

I applaud this idea and fully support it! I also note that it is extremely smart to document what didn't work, as well as what did, w/ ComCon and how Events will be different. Way too often we do these reboots by the seat of our pants. This is the way to do it.

Re: on "meritocracy"

> On Mar 28, 2019, at 10:37 AM, Naomi Slater wrote: > > I'd argue that it's actually the failure of the foundation. we're > responsible for instilling the "apache way", so we're responsible for its > shortcomings. and our diversity stats *do* reveal some pretty large > shortcomings > > to

Re: on "meritocracy"

I am sorry that this discussion has devolved to ad-hominem attacks and dispersions of character. As such, although I agree that we need to address any actionable items in addressing inclusion and diversity concerns, I'll remove myself from this thread.

Re: on "meritocracy"

> On Mar 28, 2019, at 10:20 AM, Naomi Slater wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 14:35, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> So what are you proposing? What actionable corrections can we make >> that don't turn the concept of "it doesn't matter who you are, it is what >

Re: on "meritocracy"

So what are you proposing? What actionable corrections can we make that don't turn the concept of "it doesn't matter who you are, it is what you do that counts" on its ear? If we are actively (or passively) discouraging diversity, then it is a problem, of course. Are we? The issue, for me at

Re: on "meritocracy"

> On Mar 28, 2019, at 8:00 AM, Naomi Slater wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 12:45, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> some people, "meritocracy" is a bad word, and I say I disagree. >> >> even when studies show that using that word *specifically*

Re: on "meritocracy"

FWIW, I still use the term meritocracy and, in fact, did so at the ApacheCon roadshow in DC this week. I address up front that for some people, "meritocracy" is a bad word, and I say I disagree. I then say something like the below: "Merit has nothing to do with gender, or race, or religion,

Re: Why are large code drops damaging to a community?

Ahh... I missed the "so if y'all would like to elaborate" part of your email... Let me pull together some thoughts and expand/extend the story :) > On Oct 31, 2018, at 4:44 AM, Myrle Krantz wrote: > > I haven't given up hope that Jim > will provide more details. >

Re: Why are large code drops damaging to a community?

vely that there will be a small group of people that are >sourced from such delayed-contribution types - that work on doing the > merges. The key seems to be to create the incentive to share code before >others do, to avoid being the one that breaks the build. > >

Re: Why are large code drops damaging to a community?

Large code drops are almost always damaging, since inherent in that process is the concept of "throwing the code over a wall". But sometimes it does work out, assuming that continuity and "good intentions" are followed. To show this, join me in the Wayback Machine as Sherman and I travel to the

Re: Ideas feedbacks for ACNA

Another thing I thought about was maybe a tablet or something setup w/ an easy interface to subscribe to project dev@ lists. After each talk about a project, the speaker could suggest going to the ASF booth and signing up. > On Oct 2, 2018, at 6:50 AM, Liu Ted wrote: > > Hi Sharan, One

Re: [DISCUSSION] Running another ASF Committer Diversity Survey

> On Oct 1, 2018, at 1:28 PM, Nick Burch wrote: > > > One suggestion I'd make is to review the text of some other foundations / > tech organisation's surveys, and if we're missing questions they've asked or > have different incompatible wording, make sure we have that for a reason. (Or >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Running another ASF Committer Diversity Survey

Count me in. FWIW: I will likely be out of pocket mostly this week but will review and comment as I can > On Oct 1, 2018, at 5:30 AM, Sharan Foga wrote: > > Hi All > > It’s been nearly 2 years since we ran our ASF Committer Diversity Survey so I > think it's about time that we looked at

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Trevor Grant as a new PMC member

w00t! > On Sep 26, 2018, at 11:39 AM, Sharan Foga wrote: > > The Community Development PMC has invited Trevor Grant to become a new member > of the PMC and are happy to announce that he has accepted. > > Trevor has shown himself to be positive and enthusiastic at helping out at > many Apache

Re: What happened to the Committers Map?

+1 > On Sep 26, 2018, at 6:32 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 7:02 PM Nick Burch wrote: >> ...There has been talk in the past of letting people store their info in >> either somewhere else central, or in a more convenient format, but alas no >> decisions. If you

Re: YATAWP

OSCON reminded me that a lot of > folks still think "Apache" == "that webserver I installed once" and had no > idea about the other projects and *all the stuff* the foundation does/is, so > I wanted to work that in, too. > > -- > Daniel Ruggeri > >

Re: YATAWP

Thanks! There seems very little meat on the actual Apache Way and it's more an overview of the ASF and our projects. Is that the intent? > On Aug 21, 2018, at 2:24 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > ... stands for "Yet Another The Apache Way Presentation" :-) > > I just wanted to share this for

Re: Looking for someone who can answer questions wrt. Open Source and Standardization

I'd be happy to. I've done similar things for both companies and some gov't orgs. > On Jul 4, 2018, at 7:56 AM, Isabel Drost-Fromm wrote: > > Hi, > > I have been contacted by a friend who is working on a study about the topic > "Open Source and standardization" for the EU commission. He would

Re: Feedback on the booth at Apache EU Roadshow + FOSS Backstage last week

I thought it was great, but it didn't seem to me to be all that clear that people knew where it was and understood *what* it was. Some people thought it was a hangout place where ONLY Apache members could mull around. > On Jun 18, 2018, at 4:10 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > Hi, > >

Re: [REQUEST] Speakers and Volunteers for OpenExpo Europe 2018 Madrid

anish. I know that they are trying to include more English speaking content > in their programme. > > Thanks > Sharan > > On 2018-01-05 14:48, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >> I'd love to help, but my Spanish is very, very rusty :( >> >>>

Re: [REQUEST] Speakers and Volunteers for OpenExpo Europe 2018 Madrid

I'd love to help, but my Spanish is very, very rusty :( > On Jan 5, 2018, at 8:41 AM, Sharan Foga wrote: > > Hi Everyone > > Here is an update about our involvement in the Open Expo Conference in Madrid > later this year. We are actively looking for speakers to present and

All Things Open 2018

Todd Lewis from ATO is starting the planning for ATO2018 and he and I have been chatting for awhile about having some sort of "dedicated" Apache track or even mini-ApacheCon alongside the event. Anyway, it's time for the rubber to hit the road, as it were, about this. I'd like to stay involved

Re: [REQUEST FOR ARTICLE] Would you like to participate in the OpenExpo Europe 2018 ebook?

Sign me up :) > On Dec 17, 2017, at 11:51 AM, Sharan Foga wrote: > > Hi All > > A similar request has been sent out to our committers list but I also wanted > to include it here just in case we can gather some additional volunteers. > > We have been invited to have an ASF

Re: [VOLUNTEERS NEEDED] for Apache Booth at All Things Open

I fly in the 22nd and out the 25th. But I don't get in on the 22nd until late :( > On Oct 15, 2017, at 7:48 PM, Melissa Warnkin > wrote: > > Hey all, > Is anyone going to be attending ATO and available to set up/break down the > booth? Spend some time at the

Re: Adding roster of community-focused talks

> On Jun 4, 2017, at 8:55 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > > Reminder: there are several related efforts - and tools - here. > Having one central place where all this is organized would help with that. For example, we promote

Re: Adding roster of community-focused talks

Thanks... I added some entries. Also, I have been working w/ some conf producers regarding their interest in us providing an Apache track (or tracks) to their existing confs. Will keep people posted on status. > On May 24, 2017, at 9:59 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > > Nick &

Re: Adding roster of community-focused talks

rea I'm happy to give the training. > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 7:21 AM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On 05/23/2017 09:37 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> Count me in! I have my standard Apache Way talk, and my >>> "Apache Way and

Re: Adding roster of community-focused talks

Count me in! I have my standard Apache Way talk, and my "Apache Way and InnerSource 101" talk. -- Mr. Peabody > On May 23, 2017, at 9:31 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > > > On 05/22/2017 10:13 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote: >> We had a lot of great feedback about the Apache Way track

Re: Apache Speaker Templates

Thanks! These are wide-screen templates... Are we sure that all displays will be wide-screen compatible? > On Apr 28, 2017, at 9:08 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > FYI - for folks that want a different option for speaker templates. > > --Rich > > > Forwarded Message

Re: Do we have a template for ApacheCon Miami?

I like it. Thx for sharing. > On Apr 26, 2017, at 11:47 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > > In case someone has improvements to suggest, please > > Cheers > > Jean-Frederic > > > Forwarded Message > Subject: Re: Do we have a template for ApacheCon Miami?

Re: Vetoes for New Committers??

> On Mar 29, 2017, at 9:45 AM, Pierre Smits wrote: > > > Having the must-have-consensus (or unanimity) approach applied to > everything doesn't work as it stalls moving forward (or beyond petty > sentiments). > I'm not saying that majority rule is not a viable method

Re: Vetoes for New Committers??

> On Mar 29, 2017, at 9:11 AM, Pierre Smits wrote: > > Applying the 'consensus', (or rather the 'every thing must be discussed > first') aspect everywhere is equally tyrranical. > > Hence the existence of the simple majority vote (50% of votes cast, + 1 > with a min of

Re: Vetoes for New Committers??

> On Mar 28, 2017, at 8:15 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > I asked a similar question on another list some time back, around voting in > new committers. I'm not going to share that thread (public vs private) but > I think the advice i got from it was spot on. In addition,

ApacheCon 2017 talks

I got accepted for 3 talks... Although I am *most* appreciative, I don't want to take any space or opportunity away from others who maybe could benefit from the exposure and/or experience... I'd be happy w/ just 2 if that works out better; but will do all 3 to my best ability. Just saying :)

Re: What's the plan? What are we here for?

> On Dec 6, 2016, at 1:26 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 3:10 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: >> Hi Rich, >> >> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: >>> ...I think it's >>> fine for us, as

Re: ApacheCon Speaker Templates

Can we confirm that 4:3 aspect ratio? I know some LF confs are moving to wide. > On Nov 2, 2016, at 6:50 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > > On 11/01/2016 01:35 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: >> I'm not having much luck contacting The Usual Suspects for ApacheCon >> speaker templates,

Re: Things ToDo at ApacheCon

Kewl. Thx! > On Oct 19, 2016, at 1:59 PM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > > No, I don't believe we have one of those yet. > > How about: https://public.etherpad-mozilla.org/p/aceu-2016-people > > > On 10/19/2016 11:44 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> I s

Things ToDo at ApacheCon

I seem to recall we used to have a wiki page someplace where people could add in their arrival/leaving dates/times, flight numbers, things-to-do, etc... Do we have one setup for ACEU2016? - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: ASF Speakers for Devrelcon 2016 - London?

I'd love to speak there... I could do the Apache Way talk or a variation of my Why Community Matters talk from the LF Collab Summit. > On Jun 23, 2016, at 7:40 AM, Sharan Foga wrote: > > Hi All > > I saw a link about Devrelcon in London later this year. > >

Re: [APACHECON] Question about Lightning Talks

So why No Slides? Mostly it's to prevent the switch-out of laptops which causes delays. This was back when the timer-app was run on my laptop on the podium. Since we do this differently now, we may consider a change ;) > On Jun 6, 2016, at 5:06 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote: >

Re: ApacheCon audio processing: Instructions

Rich, Thx. I have video of some sessions, and my plan is to use the audio from your recordings w/ the video from mine. Once I see which videos turned out OK, I will let ComDev know. > On May 15, 2016, at 11:19 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > The instructions for helping edit

Re: [ApacheCon] Volunteers needed, Audio processing

I will try to remember to bring my GoPro and a tripod. > On May 5, 2016, at 8:29 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > As some of you know, we do not have a sponsor to handle audio/video > recording at ApacheCon this year. Thus, we'll be doing it ourselves - > just audio, not video. >

Re: Please help in joining Apache Community

https://helpwanted.apache.org is a nice 1st step... > On Mar 24, 2016, at 12:30 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > > On 21/03/2016 14:05, Pravu Mishra wrote: >> Hi , >> >> >> I am interested to join the Apache community and contribute. >> >> >> Please let me introduce me. My name

Re: Contribution

Thx for your Email! We have a semi-experimental site, https://helpwanted.apache.org, which provides some ideas on what sorts of help our projects are looking for. I would suggest checking it out and seeing if any of those tasks strikes your fancy. Cheers!! > On Mar 11, 2016, at 5:55 AM, Rahul

Re: mod_proxy_wstunnel incomplete handshake

Thank you for your email. I am forwarding this to the correct Email list, which is d...@httpd.apache.org. > On Mar 8, 2016, at 11:28 AM, t...@able.be wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm currently testing a Web socket application behind an apache reverse > proxy. I started off with apache version 2.4.12,

Fwd: Looking for speakers at Linuxwochen Vienna

What I had replied a coupla days ago. > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> > Subject: Re: Looking for speakers at Linuxwochen Vienna > Date: February 16, 2016 at 9:26:56 AM EST > To: Andreas Willich <andr...@linuxwochen.at> > Mes

  1   2   >