Yes, the changes to settings.xml helped. That got me past that issue.
However, I ended up having some problems with the GPG side of things
(GPG on Mac OSX) - similar to [1] so I couldn't close the stage repo.
It seems like the artifacts were signed by a subkey which apparently
doesn't work. So it
Hi David
On 22/03/12 08:47, David Bosschaert wrote:
Yes, the changes to settings.xml helped. That got me past that issue.
However, I ended up having some problems with the GPG side of things
(GPG on Mac OSX) - similar to [1] so I couldn't close the stage repo.
It seems like the artifacts were
On Thursday, March 22, 2012 08:47:16 AM David Bosschaert wrote:
Yes, the changes to settings.xml helped. That got me past that issue.
However, I ended up having some problems with the GPG side of things
(GPG on Mac OSX) - similar to [1] so I couldn't close the stage repo.
It seems like the
On 22 March 2012 11:13, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
On Thursday, March 22, 2012 08:47:16 AM David Bosschaert wrote:
Yes, the changes to settings.xml helped. That got me past that issue.
However, I ended up having some problems with the GPG side of things
(GPG on Mac OSX) - similar to
Hi David
On 22/03/12 12:50, David Bosschaert wrote:
On 22 March 2012 11:13, Daniel Kulpdk...@apache.org wrote:
On Thursday, March 22, 2012 08:47:16 AM David Bosschaert wrote:
Yes, the changes to settings.xml helped. That got me past that issue.
However, I ended up having some problems with
On 22 March 2012 13:41, Sergey Beryozkin sberyoz...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm seeing 1.4-SNAPSHOT in poms, I guess I can update that easily later on
to 1.3.2-SNAPSHOT as I won't have enough 'material' to call a 1.4 release in
few months time, the upgrade to Blueprint would of course go to 1.4 :-),
Hi Sergey,
On 20 March 2012 22:09, Sergey Beryozkin sberyoz...@gmail.com wrote:
How does this Compendium cycle work ? Having CXF DOSGi RI 'endorced' as
TCK-compliant is a strong enough reason to try to cut an interim release in
the next few weeks, however, I'm wondering, when would be DOSGi
David,
On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 11:00:12 AM David Bosschaert wrote:
The TCK compliance work I did was part of the OSGi 4.3 Compendium
cycle and I expect that the RIs for that (of which CXF-DOSGi is part)
will be collected soon - within 2 weeks is my guess, but I can get a
more detailed
On 21 March 2012 15:34, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
If you are willing to do the release, then I think it's a good idea. I'd
rather have a release often type thing if it fixes a few issue that are
needed. Do you know if it needs a new CXF proper release or is 2.5.2 OK?
If it's just
On 21 March 2012 19:09, David Bosschaert david.bosscha...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 March 2012 15:34, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
If you are willing to do the release, then I think it's a good idea. I'd
rather have a release often type thing if it fixes a few issue that are
needed. Do
David,
Add to your ~/.m2/settings.xml something like:
settings
servers
server
idapache.releases.https/id
usernamedkulp/username
passwordyourapachepassword/password
/server
/servers
/settings
to setup your credentials needed to deploy
Yes, this is what I did.
David, I think we also need to get your public gpg key added to
http://pgp.mit.edu/, here are some links I found useful.
http://irtfweb.ifa.hawaii.edu/~lockhart/gpg/gpg-cs.html
https://docs.sonatype.org/display/Repository/How+To+Generate+PGP+Signatures+With+Maven
You
I just got confirmation that the current trunk of the CXF-DOSGi passes
the TCK again. It would be *really* good if we could release this
version so that the Remote Services and RSA RI in the OSGi systems is
a released version of CXF-DOSGi rather than a snapshot. Sergey, could
I maybe ask you to do
Hi David
On 20/03/12 08:00, David Bosschaert wrote:
I just got confirmation that the current trunk of the CXF-DOSGi passes
the TCK again.
Great news, thanks for the support from your side,
It would be *really* good if we could release this
version so that the Remote Services and RSA RI in
Hi Sergey,
On 20 March 2012 09:47, Sergey Beryozkin sberyoz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David
On 20/03/12 08:00, David Bosschaert wrote:
I just got confirmation that the current trunk of the CXF-DOSGi passes
the TCK again.
Great news, thanks for the support from your side,
It would be
Hi David
On 20/03/12 11:00, David Bosschaert wrote:
Hi Sergey,
On 20 March 2012 09:47, Sergey Beryozkinsberyoz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David
On 20/03/12 08:00, David Bosschaert wrote:
I just got confirmation that the current trunk of the CXF-DOSGi passes
the TCK again.
Great news, thanks
Just a little update on this.
I made some more changes and at this point in time we're getting
close. For me the OSGi Remote Services and Remote Service Admin TCKs
are 100% passing but other people did report a failure that we have to
investigate a little further.
I'll chime in again when
Hi David
On 19/02/12 00:42, David Bosschaert wrote:
Hi all,
I was recently running the CXF-DOSGi 1.3 release through the OSGi TCK
to make sure it's still compliant with the spec.
It turned out that the changes made between 1.2 and 1.3 cause a number
of TCK failures, so I've been looking at
Hi all,
I was recently running the CXF-DOSGi 1.3 release through the OSGi TCK
to make sure it's still compliant with the spec.
It turned out that the changes made between 1.2 and 1.3 cause a number
of TCK failures, so I've been looking at fixing them.
Here's a quick summary.
* the single-bundle
19 matches
Mail list logo
