RE: Regarding List Control

Yes list can show 10,000 items but it has taken 7-8 mins to renderer the list.This impacts performance. I will do profiling and let you know -Original Message- From: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 11:08 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject:

Re: Regarding List Control

Hi, > I want to show 1000 items in the list .But it was taking so much time. A list should easily be able to cope with a 1000 items and I've used a lists with 100,000 item without issues. It may be an issue with your item render. Can you post some sample code so we can see what is going on. A

Regarding List Control

Hello, I want to show 1000 items in the list .But it was taking so much time. Now I have to show 10 items at a time and on next click I have to show next 10 items. What control will be more beneficial? How can we add this. Thanks, Seema

AIR on Android x86 based devices

We've been doing some work on Mobile AIR, and ran into an intriguing scenario. The project we are working on is a fairly large Flex app that we converted to Spark/Mobile. We ran it on iPad, as well as Samsung Tablets (up until 2). Runs great, almost desktop like performance. Then we ran it on a Sam

Re: ADL Bug - Apache Flex 4.11.0

Hi Maurice, This is not my first mobile Flex app, I have been working on a project using Apache Flex 4.10.0 (AIR 3.8) with the same environment (Intellij IDEA 12), and it has no issue on that until I have upgraded to Apache Flex 4.11.0 (AIR 3.9). Screenshot: http://ponpon.my/apacheflex/af004.jpg

RE: Getting SuperTabNavigator child

Instead of directly accessing the children, which could lead to complex code which would be prone to failure and difficult to modify, try using a Facade object, implemented as either a singleton or using injection (if you happen to be using a framework which supports it). I recommend a singleto

Re: Re:Air Stage Text Issue

Hi DarkStone, Thank you for your post. Can you please share the code for the same as I am little confused on how to achieve this. Thanks is Advance -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Air-Stage-Text-Issue-tp30223p31670.html Sent from the Apac

Getting SuperTabNavigator child

Hi, I have several components (Box with DataGrids) dynamically added as children to SuperTabNavigator. Need to get a handle to such child component to refresh its DataGrid's data (or possibly to close it and open another one like that with new data). So how can I get a handle to the child of Supe

Getting SuperTabNavigator child

Hi, I have several components (Box with DataGrids) added as children to SuperTabNavigator. Need to get a handle to such child component to refresh its DataGrid's data (or possibly to close it and open another one like that with new data). So how can I get a handle to the child of SuperTabNavigato

RE: License Stuff

@Chris, Not sure IDEs like IntelliJ could deal with reading the swc/library.swf content from a zip though, it could be an issue as I recall it was one dealing with that in Randori IntelliJ Plugin, I had to write a RblFileDecompiler as Rbl was compress file containing swc, natively, IntelliJ can't d

RE: License Stuff

> but that's not quite true ... each maven repo has a root and relative to that the groupId, artifactId and version make up the relative path finished by the file name containing the artifactId, version and classifier. Just explained that too in the other thread though :) -Fred -Message d'or

RE: License Stuff

I was just wondering if FM was dealing with such a situation :) -Message d'origine- De : christofer.d...@c-ware.de [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de] Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 23:11 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : AW: License Stuff Hi Frederic, but that's not quite true ... each m

Re: AW: License Stuff

On 10/29/13 3:06 PM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de" wrote: >It's not just the pom, but the directory structure and the naming of the >file ... so all of these would have to be adjusted. That might be possible as well, as long as we treat the AIR SDK as a single file and don't have to mess with its

Re: License Stuff

Well, at one point, I thought Chris thought we didn't have to populate Maven info throughout the entire AIR SDK tree. It is a "leaf" so there shouldn't be any other dependencies to chase down from deeper within that folder tree. A JAR is also a compressed entity, and JARs aren't exploded out to a

AW: License Stuff

Hi Frederic, but that's not quite true ... each maven repo has a root and relative to that the groupId, artifactId and version make up the relative path finished by the file name containing the artifactId, version and classifier. In Flexmojos I handle the config.zip in a way that it is fetched

Re: License Stuff

On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Frédéric THOMAS wrote: > > The FP SDK is just playerglobal.swc. It is a single file so if there was > a pom.xml next to it, would that be sufficient? > > Thanks for make me recall again :-) yes, you're right it could be enough. > > > AIR is a compressed tree of fi

AW: License Stuff

It's not just the pom, but the directory structure and the naming of the file ... so all of these would have to be adjusted. Chris -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2013 22:46 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: License

RE: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer

There are some tree and maven convention in locating and naming the files we can't avoid from what I know, see [1] but if this is possible to do on a download server at Adobe, it could work IMO, @Chris, any remarks ? -Fred [1] http://apacheflexvm.cloudapp.net/artifactory/simple/ext-release-local/

RE: License Stuff

> The FP SDK is just playerglobal.swc. It is a single file so if there was a pom.xml next to it, would that be sufficient? Thanks for make me recall again :-) yes, you're right it could be enough. > AIR is a compressed tree of files. There is an issue about the fact that the runtime is bundled,

Re: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer

The Apache Flex bits don't have third-party stuff in it AFAIK. My understanding was that the plan was to pull the Apache Flex bits from sonewhere and the Adobe bits from Adobe download servers and write some sort of licensing/registration shim. -Alex On 10/29/13 2:47 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote

Re: License Stuff

OK, but first, I want to settle this thing about pom.xml on Adobe download servers. I spent a considerable amount of time pursuing the pom.xml approach and I don't want to go back for another set of negotiations if I don't have to. -Alex On 10/29/13 2:45 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >@Alex, @Ch

RE: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer

Bad luck here too :( Thanks, -Fred -Message d'origine- De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com] Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 22:46 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer Hi, > Isn't there some repo on Apache hardware where the Apache

Re: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer

Hi, > Isn't there some repo on Apache hardware where the Apache Flex bits should > live? Yes but it doesn't allow hosting of 3rd party stuff in releases. [1] Justin 1.http://www.apache.org/dev/repository-faq.html#thirdparty

RE: License Stuff

@Alex, @Chris, I'd like to be in the loop with the Brian Fox communication please, if there is a way to sort out everything via Sonatype, it should be optimal and being in the loop would allow me to ask about technical things hoping to dissipate the doubts about the feasibility I still have. Thank

Re: License Stuff

Like I said, I don't know much about Maven. IIRC, there was some thinking that, because the FP and AIR SDKs are the "leaf" of a dependency tree, there wasn't much more than a pom.xml needed. I believe I even looked at a few files on some Maven repo and that seemed to be the only major difference.

RE: License Stuff

I can't see how 1 or more pom.xml on their server could help Alex, we need artifacts and classifiers along with the project descriptor, I mean trees entire mavenized SDKs. did I miss or forgot something again :-) ? -Fred -Message d'origine- De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envo

Re: License Stuff

Adobe did not want to deal with registration or a way to avoid the license dialog, but I'm pretty sure we got permission to put up pom.xml files on the current downloads server. On 10/29/13 2:29 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >IIRC Adobe didn't want to invest in a server just for that. > >-Fred >

RE: License Stuff

I meant, invest any resources even IIRC -Message d'origine- De : Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com] Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 22:29 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : RE: License Stuff IIRC Adobe didn't want to invest in a server just for that. -Fred -Message d'orig

RE: License Stuff

IIRC Adobe didn't want to invest in a server just for that. -Fred -Message d'origine- De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 22:20 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: License Stuff On 10/29/13 2:14 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >Also, I can retrieve

RE: License Stuff

Well, I guess I would need to run [1] for all files or sign them first and deploy all of them [2] in a big jar, not though what is the exact way but sure I couldn't be run for nightly builds even though for snapshots only, it takes too long. [1] mvn gpg:sign-and-deploy-file -DpomFile= myLib.pom -D

Re: License Stuff

On 10/29/13 2:14 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >Also, I can retrieve it at the moment but when I read the specific Air >license terms, I understood it couldn't be distributed in piece but only >in >only one full and original distribution. Yes, that's probably true, and the runtimes are part of t

Re: AW: AW: License Stuff

Well, someone on the mailing list recently and quickly got a distribution agreement, but I think in this case it will take longer if you are seeking an exemption from requiring the acceptance of the license. -Alex On 10/29/13 2:07 PM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de" wrote: >Well it seems the is not

RE: License Stuff

Also, I can retrieve it at the moment but when I read the specific Air license terms, I understood it couldn't be distributed in piece but only in only one full and original distribution. > contact an Adobe Mobile & Devices representative I guess, I will, I want to see if there is a way at Sonatyp

AW: AW: License Stuff

Well it seems the is nothing like that: http://nexus.cestpasdur.com/nexus/content/repositories/sonatype-forge/com/adobe/flex/framework/playerglobal/4.6.b.23201/ As you can see, it's as easy as accessing the URL to download the playerglobal. Chris -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Alex Harui

Re: AW: License Stuff

On 10/29/13 2:02 PM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de" wrote: >It should be able, but it's not the usual way to go. Think about CI >Servers ... how do you want to handle them? Via some registration key. I think that was actually your idea. Once you accept it stores (somehow) that you accepted and n

AW: License Stuff

Hi Frederic, well whenever I do a Flexmojos Release, I have to deploy quite a lot of files. That was never really a problem. I guess it should be possible to stage all the fdk files using the deployer after all it's nothing than an ordinary maven deploy. All that's different to an ordinary depl

AW: License Stuff

I gave Brian the Alex' contact. Hopefully Alex will be able to give him the contact he needs to sort this out. It seems easy to ask for the permission to redistribute, but I doubt it will be that easy to actually receive the permission to do so .. so keep your fingers crossed. Chris -Ursp

Re: License Stuff

I hadn't noticed that "intranet" restriction before. I would contact Adobe via the link where it says: "contact an Adobe Mobile & Devices representative". Make sure to specify that you are only looking to distribute the AIR and FP SDKs and not the runtimes (that's true, isn't it?). I would expec

AW: License Stuff

It should be able, but it's not the usual way to go. Think about CI Servers ... how do you want to handle them? I would like to keep the maven build as normal as possible. Chris -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2013 21:3

RE: License Stuff

> Looks like it is pretty easy to get a license. Just ask here [1] I meant in order to publicly distribute adobe artifacts, not only in a closed intranet environment as mentioned, I read that document last night and others too, I haven't see any talking about an agreement to allow public distribu

Re: License Stuff

On 10/29/13 1:23 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >Thanks for reminding me, it was completely out of my head. > >> I may still set up a simple "business" to distribute the same package as >Adobe 4.6 but a license acceptance will still be required which AFAIK >still >poses a problem for Maven. > >Th

RE: License Stuff

Chris, I just had a look at the deployment process requires by Sonatype, something I did 2 years ago, so, I didn't remembered well, it was heavy and it was only one Flex Lib built by Maven. How do you think we can deploy our not Maven built SDK artifacts in the Sonatype way ? can it accept a compr

Re: AW: License Stuff

On 10/29/13 1:13 PM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de" wrote: >But if the deal Velo and Sonatype had with Adobe was enough, I guess this >would be all we need and we wouldn't have the hassle of having to >implement any sort of manual deployment wrapper as I would really hate >having to implement any

RE: License Stuff

Thanks for reminding me, it was completely out of my head. > I may still set up a simple "business" to distribute the same package as Adobe 4.6 but a license acceptance will still be required which AFAIK still poses a problem for Maven. The acceptance can be done thru the installer which in retur

AW: License Stuff

But if the deal Velo and Sonatype had with Adobe was enough, I guess this would be all we need and we wouldn't have the hassle of having to implement any sort of manual deployment wrapper as I would really hate having to implement any sort if "interactive" maven build. Chris -Ursprüngliche

Re: License Stuff

We did not pursue that approach because Apache supposedly only distributes source code with open licenses. Even if there was such an agreement, the binary packages still could not contain Adobe stuff because a binary package can only contain the compiled results of a source package. I may still s

RE:License Stuff

do you mean Adobe / apache flex? ___ De : Frédéric THOMAS [webdoubl...@hotmail.com] Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 20:53 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : RE: License Stuff Not sure if it has been already asked but can't Apache / Apache Flex sign a Distribution

RE: License Stuff

Not sure if it has been already asked but can't Apache / Apache Flex sign a Distribution agreement ? -Message d'origine- De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 17:57 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: License Stuff On 10/29/13 7:16 AM, "christofer.d

RE: Mozilla takes on Flash

Ok that's what I thought. So Apple controls it's own implementation of webkit and objective C runtime. The ironic thing is that claim of a closed Flash runtime etc etc. Is anyone calling for Apple to give away the iOS runtime so we can run Apple apps in a browser? Anyway, it appears that the ja

RE: Mozilla takes on Flash

>Search for "Puffin Web Browser" on the App Store. >https://itunes.apple.com/fr/app/puffin-web-browser-free/id472937654?mt=8 >It has support for Flash. >But it's so slow, even on simple flash pages... The real key to this is in the detail. This is from the apple licensing agreement: "3.3.2 An

Re: AW: AW: AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer

See, told you I'm out of my area ;-) On 10/29/13 10:54 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > >> >> >> On 10/29/13 1:29 AM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de" >> wrote: >> >> >Well I doubt it would be possible to Setup protected Areas as this is >>in >>

Re: AW: AW: AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer

On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 10/29/13 1:29 AM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de" > wrote: > > >Well I doubt it would be possible to Setup protected Areas as this is in > >contrast to the "public-repo" idea. But I would still prefer to have the > >fdk deployed somewhere r

RE: ADL Bug - Apache Flex 4.11.0

OK. And please use us...@flex.apache.org the next time. Maurice -Message d'origine- De : Cesar Draw [mailto:cesar.d...@xys.com.br] Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 18:51 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: ADL Bug - Apache Flex 4.11.0 Thanks Maurice, I will compare with my to configure c

Re: ADL Bug - Apache Flex 4.11.0

Thanks Maurice, I will compare with my to configure correctly. If it works, I notice. 2013/10/29 Maurice Amsellem > ADL is always located in the bin/ directory of SDK that you set for your > module. > In my case, it's C:\Program Files (x86)\Apache > Flex\Apache_Flex_SDK_411_GA\bin\adl.exe > >

RE: ADL Bug - Apache Flex 4.11.0

ADL is always located in the bin/ directory of SDK that you set for your module. In my case, it's C:\Program Files (x86)\Apache Flex\Apache_Flex_SDK_411_GA\bin\adl.exe The version of ADL will depend on the AIR version that you selected when installing ApacheFlex with the Installer. You can c

Re: ADL Bug - Apache Flex 4.11.0

Maurice, my intelliJ is 12.0.3 Windows 7 64 bits, which the path of your adl? 2013/10/29 Maurice Amsellem > I am using IntelliJ 12.1.4 on Windows 7, and ADL runs fine at all common > resolutions. > > Maybe someone from JetBrains can answer this issue. > > Maurice > > -Message d'origine-

Re: ADL Bug - Apache Flex 4.11.0

Using IntelliJ and yes the first time. But in FlashBuilder no need to configure the number of usb port. 2013/10/29 Maurice Amsellem > There must be something wrong in your configuration or environement. > > Can you please post the code for ApacheFlex411.mxml and > ApacheFlex411-app.mxml that we

RE: Mozilla takes on Flash

This is what I was thinking, but the hardware is finally getting powerful enough on mobile that you should be able to run the desktop player now. I have a thinkpad tablet 2 with win8 and it can do stage3d flash in desktop mode swimmingly. So maybe a javascript export through class mapping is th

RE: ADL Bug - Apache Flex 4.11.0

I am using IntelliJ 12.1.4 on Windows 7, and ADL runs fine at all common resolutions. Maybe someone from JetBrains can answer this issue. Maurice -Message d'origine- De : Cesar Draw [mailto:cesar.d...@xys.com.br] Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 18:25 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re:

Re: ADL Bug - Apache Flex 4.11.0

I have the same difficulty in IntelliJ my device is a Sansung Galaxy tab 8.9 and galaxy sii in FlashBuilder not had this problem. 2013/10/29 Joel Tan > Hi, not sure whether it is a bug or some setting I have done it wrongly. I > have downloaded Apache Flex 4.11.0 and try to create a mobile app,

RE: ADL Bug - Apache Flex 4.11.0

There must be something wrong in your configuration or environement. Can you please post the code for ApacheFlex411.mxml and ApacheFlex411-app.mxml that we can see on the background ? Also, is it your first mobile Flex application ? Maurice -Message d'origine- De : Joel Tan [mailto:j

Re: Mozilla takes on Flash

On 10/29/13 9:49 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wrote: >On 29/10/2013 16:35, f...@dfguy.us wrote: >> Agreed 100%. What I always wondered is why someone, like mozilla, >>google or even Adobe themselves, doesn't write a browser that has flash >>player embedded in it as an app on the app store. >Because Appl

RE: Mozilla takes on Flash

> Because Apple wont allow you that sort of app on iOS. Because then you could > buy games without using the App Store. Search for "Puffin Web Browser" on the App Store. https://itunes.apple.com/fr/app/puffin-web-browser-free/id472937654?mt=8 It has support for Flash. But it's so slow, even on

Re: License Stuff

On 10/29/13 7:16 AM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de" wrote: >Hi Guys, > >I am currently talking to Brian Fox from Sonatype. He told me that >Sonatype signed a Distribution Agreement with Adobe had been signed in >2008, but this has expired 2009, but it seems they are willing to re-sign >such an Agr

ADL Bug - Apache Flex 4.11.0

Hi, not sure whether it is a bug or some setting I have done it wrongly. I have downloaded Apache Flex 4.11.0 and try to create a mobile app, the ADL emulator seem to be not working correctly. 1) The screen size does not follow the configuration setting. In my configuration setting I have set i

Re: Mozilla takes on Flash

On 29/10/2013 16:35, f...@dfguy.us wrote: Agreed 100%. What I always wondered is why someone, like mozilla, google or even Adobe themselves, doesn't write a browser that has flash player embedded in it as an app on the app store. Because Apple wont allow you that sort of app on iOS. Because the

Re: AW: AW: AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer

On 10/29/13 1:29 AM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de" wrote: >Well I doubt it would be possible to Setup protected Areas as this is in >contrast to the "public-repo" idea. But I would still prefer to have the >fdk deployed somewhere reliable. I know in our Business things Change >quite fast I wouldn

Re: Mozilla takes on Flash

Agreed 100%. What I always wondered is why someone, like mozilla, google or even Adobe themselves, doesn't write a browser that has flash player embedded in it as an app on the app store. There was a version of AIR for desktop for html projects that was basically this exact thing. Webkit was ru

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer

That's good to know. It could have been that Marvin wasn't fully authorized to distribute. However, the Adobe Legal folks I talked to still want a licensing dialog to be accepted by the user before you distribute to them. And with AIR, you will probably need more than airglobal.swc. Probably th

FlexJS

Liebe Grüße von der Gozzoburg Ing, Susanne Buchinger +43 676 84 64 24 244 - MBIT Solutions GMBH - IT Solutions | Marketing Hoher Markt 11 / 2. Stock, 3500 Krems, Austria Tel. +43 2732 728 18 | Fax. +43 720 523 243 99 off...@mbit.at | www.m

Re: Mozilla takes on Flash

On 10/29/13 6:40 AM, "f...@dfguy.us" wrote: >Well the ability to control display objects however you want and the >entire class structure is obviously different. So you essentially have >everything on screen as a canvas. Plus the display list allows you to >manage the organization of objects in

Re: [FALCON] working on Mustella

Falcon is a SWF compiler and doesn't translate anything. FalconJX is the cross-compiler. All it does is translate AS to JS. A call to HTTPService in AS still needs to find an HTTPService "class" in JS. One JS HTTPService is currently written to use XMLHTTPRequest. -Alex On 10/29/13 8:06 AM, "

Re: [FALCON] working on Mustella

Thanks for trying it. Was that Spark or mx Label? Dump the SWF or send me the SWF and see if any definefont tags are in there. It could be that we find Batik's font manager for non-CFF embedding, but there should be no way it would work for Spark and CFF embedding. You may be able to clear out

Re: Mozilla takes on Flash

While Adobe deserve some vitriol for the way they have handled Flash, i would say that Steve Jobs is the true villain - if Flash Player had been welcomed onto iDevices, it would still have a bright future and we wouldn't be having this discussion. But, as Igor says, no point crying over spilt

RE: Mozilla takes on Flash

If Shumway ever gets completed and officially supported, it could extend swf format lifetime but it would also introduce a platform fragmentation. >Think about it this way. Right now Flash Player is implemented in a >combination of low-level programming languages and compiled for native code >s

Re: [FALCON] working on Mustella

Does falcon succesfully translate httpservice components into ajax calls? I'm curious about what a flex app that's heavy on SOA comes out of falcon as. One thing I thought could be bad about the flash plugin is inspecting and debugging http requests and responses etc. David -Original Mes

[FALCON] working on Mustella

Hi, We left the discussion on using Falcon on the SDK with the idea to see what it would take get Mustella tests to pass. Alex wrote: >>There is no embedded font support in Falcon at this time, so running >> Mustella is guaranteed to generate a lot of failures. I suppose that some >> energetic p

Re: Mozilla takes on Flash

Too much hate from people with Adobe. IMO this is the way life is, get used to. Let's focus only on Flex and FlexJS, past it's where it belongs history. Let's make another history here. Shumway is an effort to make browser plug-in free, part of every browser vendor.

RE: License Stuff

QUITE A LOT :) As soon as possible! Good work Chris! Miguel > From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:16:16 +0100 > Subject: License Stuff > > Hi Guys, > > I am currently talking to Brian Fox from Sonatype. He told me that Sonatype > signed a Di

License Stuff

Hi Guys, I am currently talking to Brian Fox from Sonatype. He told me that Sonatype signed a Distribution Agreement with Adobe had been signed in 2008, but this has expired 2009, but it seems they are willing to re-sign such an Agreement. For which parts would we Need an Agreement from Adobe?

Re: Mozilla takes on Flash

Well the ability to control display objects however you want and the entire class structure is obviously different. So you essentially have everything on screen as a canvas. Plus the display list allows you to manage the organization of objects in a nice clean way that is intuitive. Also my expe

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer

Premature to 'woot! '? On 29 Oct 2013 13:35, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de" wrote: > Just got a Response: > > "Hi Chris, I will double check, but I am almost positive we signed this > back when Marvin was actively maintaining flexmojos." > > So this Looks extremely positive :-) *amreallyexitedaboutt

AW: AW: AW: AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer

Just got a Response: "Hi Chris, I will double check, but I am almost positive we signed this back when Marvin was actively maintaining flexmojos." So this Looks extremely positive :-) *amreallyexitedaboutthis* Von: Miguel Ferreira [miguel.cd.ferre...@ho

Re: Mozilla takes on Flash

Given the way this plugin/native thing is done (is it a plugin or not? the site says it so), I think this initiative is less than interesting. All in all, wouldn’t it best to do it ‘compile wise’ ? (interpretation, layers over layers, etc … just for outputting to JS? what would be the pros ?) Ce

Re: Mozilla takes on Flash

If Shumway ever gets completed and officially supported, it could extend swf format lifetime but it would also introduce a platform fragmentation. Not sure if it could ever cover the entire functionality of Adobe Flash player? As I understand it, mostly because of 3rd party IP. Adobe has a busine

RE: AW: AW: AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer

That will be perfect and really really useful. Miguel > From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:17:26 +0100 > Subject: AW: AW: AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer > > I just signed up to the Mailinglist and sent an inquiry ... let's see w

AW: AW: AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer

I just signed up to the Mailinglist and sent an inquiry ... let's see what they answer. After all ... eventually they allready have signed an Agreement as Velo used to deploy stuff there ... Chris Von: Avi Kessner [akess...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Dienstag,

RE: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer

Thanks guys, I finally read closely the Flash Player and Air specific license and seen when they talk about distribution, they talk about intranet, could you point a link on the Distribution license you're talking about. Thanks, Frédéric THOMAS > From: aha...@adobe.com > To: dev@flex.apache.or

Re: AW: AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer

If I knew how/what, I would contact Sonotype. brought to you by the letters A, V, and I and the number 47 On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:29 AM, christofer.d...@c-ware.de < christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > Well I doubt it would be possible to Setup protected Areas as this is in > contrast to the

AW: AW: AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer

Well I doubt it would be possible to Setup protected Areas as this is in contrast to the "public-repo" idea. But I would still prefer to have the fdk deployed somewhere reliable. I know in our Business things Change quite fast I wouldn't have immagined giving up my Consultant life and having a f

AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer

Hi, So what would it take for Sonatype to gain such a Distribution license from Adobe? As far as I see, we actually only Need it for the playerglobal and airglobal (Please correct me if I'm wrong). At least the number of artifacts should be minimal and it would allow us to officially deploy the

Re: Mozilla takes on Flash

Maybe I should explain myself better (now that I'm not on a mobile device) Because of Adobe's actions, I have ill-will towards Adobe. On the other hand, because of Adobe's actions, I have more job opportunities, and since I have switched over to JetBrain's tools, I also have a much more productive