Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

exJS+with+Adobe+Fl > ash+Builder > > HTH, > -Alex > > On 9/7/17, 10:42 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Alex, > > > >Being completely out of the loop, what do I have to do to use this zip > >content on Windows

Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

Flash SDKs some day. That's why I thought about having the > compiler search for a download and expand it. > > Thoughts? > -Alex > > On 9/7/17, 9:55 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >If I could get a zip to just try it, I am

Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

If I could get a zip to just try it, I am all for this. On the plus side, if you can get a zip only for windows and documented setup for quick testing, I think this goes a long way with being able to develop the compiler and develop the ui framework separation a lot cleaner. Getting stuff ripped

Re: [VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

> > Issue Tracking > > If GitBox allows us to use GitHub issues, we will use that, otherwise, we > will request a new JIRA project from Infra. > > Other Resources > > We would like to try using Git for our website version control and > whatever the publishing process is

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

I think the name thing should be in a separate thread. Mike On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > That's a conflict. We would want a nonconflicting name that will not > confuse our users. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Aug 31, 2017, at 2:25 PM, Harbs

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

would be nice. Maybe it could future proof a compiler emitter. Mike On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Michael Schmalle <teotigraphix...@gmail.com > wrote: > Eh, I like the idea but you would then pretty much just use the rise from > ashes word, because when I first read it I had

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

Eh, I like the idea but you would then pretty much just use the rise from ashes word, because when I first read it I had no idea what it was, my dyslexia thought it was like Feline or Kleenex. (don't ask why I see an L) :) Mike On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 4:55 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala

Re: [FALCONJX] TestAMDClassA

Looking at the code one more time, :), I bet it's a threading issue with the AS3Parser. It would seem that something is getting called before the entire file collection is parsed. Since I didn't increment anything and was purely using the length of the returned definition collection, that is what

Re: [FALCONJX] TestAMDClassA

I just quickly looked at the code, it has to do with the member field ' inheritenceLevel ' and the only thing that could be happening is that for some reason the base test is either reusing an instance of the emitter or there is a

Re: [FALCONJX] TestAMDClassA

what they actually test. It seems the > code base is regularly cleaned up, but not the testsuite. > > I also disabled one test in the VF2JS part as I remember it being sort of > obsolete. > > Chris > > ________ > Von: Michael Schmalle <teo

Re: [FALCONJX] TestAMDClassA

Either ignore those for AMD or delete them. It was a prototype I did 3+ years ago, so DON'T waste time on it. I use windows. Mike On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 6:14 AM, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi, > > > I am currently making sure all the tests that pass on my Mac also

Re: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.6.0 Released

t; ant or maven. > > Thanks, > Om > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Michael Schmalle < > teotigraphix...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > Om, does the npm installer do what the Apache Flex installer does > > basically? > > > > Or does it do the w

Re: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.6.0 Released

Om, does the npm installer do what the Apache Flex installer does basically? Or does it do the whole shabang? Once you install it's all build, no need to create IDE specific stuff? Mike On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 2:42 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > I'm planning to push out

Re: Starling framework compiled to JavaScript

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Everything can be simpler, last year I went through the main javascript > > emitter and broke every thing out into sub emitters, MethodEmitter etc. > > Interesting you should say that. I noticed that in

Re: Starling framework compiled to JavaScript

t mean it has to stay that way. Mike > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Michael Schmalle < > teotigraphix...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:36 PM, bill <b...@beecavegames.com> wrote: > > > > > Here's our fork of t

Re: Starling framework compiled to JavaScript

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:36 PM, bill wrote: > Here's our fork of the flex-falcon repo: > > https://github.com/Bee-Cave-Games/flex-falcon > > The last handful of commits reflect the changes Nimai mentioned above. > We're > still learning our way around the code, so some of

Re: Starling framework compiled to JavaScript

During my original dev of the compiler I used eclipse and ran all the tests from it, running individual unit tests when I knew I was in a "sandbox". Honestly, If I start developing the compiler again, I will probably just use Eclipse again, it may not have as many neat features as IntelliJ but I

Re: Starling framework compiled to JavaScript

> I'd like to get the FalconJX code compiling and debugging, and running unit tests using IntelliJ IDEA, but I haven't gotten there yet. I wish I knew. Fred and I worked on this project for years and still didn't get it. I think "maybe" with what Chris might be doing with Maven it will be

Re: Starling framework compiled to JavaScript

Nice, we got Hungary Heros in 2012 to cross compile with the Randori compiler. Some of the issues you stated I had to correct for in that compiler but never made it into FalconJX's emitter. Curious, what are your plans for this? Are you attempting to have a fork of Starling run n WebGL?

Re: [FlexJS] Demo: FalconJX + AngularJS + Angular Material

That is nice, seeing a shinny UI on things makes it all the more real. Is there any prerequisites to using this? I saw you were making an external swc with Josh's dts2as util. Mike On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 6:25 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > As promised, here is a small

Re: Moonshine-IDE.com -- FlexJS, Flex, and ActionScript focused open source IDE -- contribution to Apache FlexJS ?

Well side note, asblocks (Apache 2) was written by me and still in my github repo. @JustinHill, what are you using asblocks for? Another member of your team said just the FileUtils, so you are including 200k of files for one class? I see you have the mxmlblocks in the source code as well. Mike

Re: [FlexJS] Using externs swc, how to specify js path

t; time. The reason we don't do that know is that we don't know if some > folks will want to use more of GCL in their project, and because GCL > doesn't have a 1:1 goog.provide to file name mapping so it does require a > bit more work to be smart. As always, volunteers are welcome to work o

Re: [FlexJS] Using externs swc, how to specify js path

What are your compile times? I was testing in IDEA and it seemed like 80 seconds was as fast as I could get a full compile with jsc and a 1 class project. I know with Randori compiler I had it conditionally compiling, there has got to be a way to conditionally compile this JS, that is the only

Re: FlexJS with Bootstrap example

31, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Michael Schmalle <teotigraphix...@gmail.com > wrote: > Ok, just had an idiot moment, I have been reading to much today, the > source code link is in bold on your site. :) > > Mike > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Michael Schmalle < > te

Re: FlexJS with Bootstrap example

Ok, just had an idiot moment, I have been reading to much today, the source code link is in bold on your site. :) Mike On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Michael Schmalle <teotigraphix...@gmail.com > wrote: > @Dhwani > > Interesting project. You have put a lot of time into it I can

Re: FlexJS with Bootstrap example

@Dhwani Interesting project. You have put a lot of time into it I can see. Since it's built in AS, are you keeping it closed source or did I miss a source code link? I noticed you have the notion of plugins, is this something an outside developer can extend in the IDE to add functionality

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC2

I won't vote with a binding vote but I did use the installer to install RC2, ran the installer script and compiled an app in IntelliJ. All worked fine. Mike On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 3/31/16, 4:03 AM, "Justin Mclean"

Re: [FLEXJS][FALCONJX] News on the Spark-like component set

Man, I would have never guessed my little tissy about FalconJS and just starting FalconJX would have got to this point that FlexJS is with all the different outputs and things being compiled with it and how you guys are not even writing js anymore, giving you time to do stuff like this. :) I will

Re: AW: AW: [FALCONJX] Some help with the externs

Yeah and when I wrote the test, the externs were in a different place that I was testing. I think Alex or somebody else refactored the locations, and if it does have an @Ignore, that would backup the fact the test wasn't run since that refactor. Mike On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Alex Harui

Re: [FALCONJX] Some help with the externs

Manager > println > SCHWERWIEGEND: [missing]:233: ERROR - Parse error. identifier is a > reserved word > int.MIN_VALUE = -2147483648; > ^ > > Mrz 18, 2016 8:01:12 PM com.google.javascript.jscomp.LoggerErrorManager > printSummary > WARNUNG: 4 error(s), 17 warning(s) > > Guess t

Re: [FALCONJX] Some help with the externs

> Another thing I noticed, was that I was getting errors while generating the AS code for "js" Are you sure these aren't errors/warnings from the actual GCC compiler? Mike On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Oh gee ... I should

Re: [FALCON] Definitely needs some love ...

Yes and at the complexity of the transpiler and amount of people that have actually touched the code, it's all understandable. When I started that project, I actually used the strategy of unit testing pretty much every AS statement and expression to produce valid AS, I didn't even think about JS

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

nswer is, I just want to make sure everybody > has a better understanding of the factors involved. > > -Alex > > > On 3/14/16, 2:50 PM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Well I am not planning on doing anything atm so it was ju

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

Chris > > ____ > Von: Michael Schmalle <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> > Gesendet: Montag, 14. März 2016 18:02 > An: dev@flex.apache.org > Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release > FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0 > > Yeah lets not

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

. :) I just hate duplicating work and that is why I asked Josh what I did, I totally wasn't asking him to donate anything. Mike On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 3/14/16, 8:34 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 3/14/16, 8:19 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >That said, there is only "so much" that compiler can do because I hacked > >it >

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

"so much" that compiler can do because I hacked it together in about a month. Thinking about a way to create something that can support a yriad amount of definitions that are supported by the current TS community is definitely something to think about. Mike > > - Josh > &g

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

Curious Josh if your typescript definition compiler can replace externc? How much overlap is there? I wanted to do exactly what you did with typescipt and use it's compiler but I didn't have enough time so I went the gcc extern route, there was a couple massive discussions a year ago bout that

Re: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

+1 I would try using the npm stuff and framework as an outside user, not s core developer right now so it would be positive. Mike On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 6:09 AM, Kessler CTR Mark J < mark.kessler@usmc.mil> wrote: > +1 > > Would have a positive impact and show continuous progress. > > >

Re: Forking the Falcon compiler for Starling/Feathers MXML generation

On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 6:48 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 3/1/16, 3:43 PM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >The problem as you have stated is there are multiple threads running and I > >ca

Re: Forking the Falcon compiler for Starling/Feathers MXML generation

then are calling their builders. The BURM is actually traversing the AST of AS3. I can't remember without looking but what is parsing the MXML? Is that JFlex? Mike On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 3/1/16, 3:17 PM, "Michael Schmalle" &

Re: Forking the Falcon compiler for Starling/Feathers MXML generation

On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 3/1/16, 2:32 PM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > >> > > >> >What does -mxml-children-as-data actually do? Does it outpu

Re: Forking the Falcon compiler for Starling/Feathers MXML generation

t; On 3/1/16, 2:30 PM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Hey Om, > > > >This is all purely hypothetical in my head right now so I may be missing > >something as well but the first goal is to use Feathers out right, that > >mea

Re: Forking the Falcon compiler for Starling/Feathers MXML generation

On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 3/1/16, 2:08 PM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Hmm, interesting. There are a couple things here I misinterpreted from my > >journey through

Re: Forking the Falcon compiler for Starling/Feathers MXML generation

better way to do this, and better names. The > reason > > it is this way is because I think it is better to have some requirements > > on the base classes of the framework rather than have the output assume > > other kinds of lifecycle calls: addElement vs addChild, wh

Re: Forking the Falcon compiler for Starling/Feathers MXML generation

; other kinds of lifecycle calls: addElement vs addChild, when to > instantiate child nodes, etc. By passing in MXML as data, the framework > gets to decide when to actually apply properties, map them to different > things, etc. > > HTH, > -Alex > > On 3/1/16, 9:40 AM, &q

Forking the Falcon compiler for Starling/Feathers MXML generation

Would I even need to fork it? I mentioned to Josh that I use MXML and Feathers extensively for these audio apps I am about to release on Android which means I have a high stake in the tech at the moment. That tinkerer side of me feels I could do something about this but I am at a loss of what I

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 2/15/16, 1:32 PM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Alex, if I had time I wouldn't do it. :) I hate build stuff and this is > >exactly why I

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

Alex, if I had time I wouldn't do it. :) I hate build stuff and this is exactly why I set that template file up. I have never had a problem getting things going, so people that are having problems are missing a step or two. It seems like a youtube video showing exactly the steps would help

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

This all came back to the beginning. The tests(Falcon, etal) were a nightmare, I'm talking 2012. When I started writing the FalconJX compiler and created falcon.jx and falcon.jx.tests Eclipse projects, I needed something that worked, so I created the template file so it would work in the two

Re: New Website Work

I think the lime green text for links needs to be darkened, usability issue. Other than that it's definitely 2016 responsive bootstrap, nice. :) Mike On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:41 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > You can see a preview of it here :

Re: [FLEXJS] FlexJS Event: Monday April 4, 2016 in San Francisco

It's kewl to see this. I think I might try something with Cordova, but it might take me a bit to get going. I will try and use a native extension but I must say, my whole understanding of the HTML/JS UI is not that great. Maybe I will have an example of Cordova and FlexJS by April, is my favorite

Re: flexjs game hugryhero

Oh yeah one other things to those that read. What Renaun proved was that the Starling framework "could" be used and it compiled to JS, so. @Alex, this is why lizhi was asking about Embed, the hungry heros examples. Mike On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Michael Schmalle <

Re: flexjs game hugryhero

Yeah, what I meant was give people like you the ability to write against native JS API, so thank you for having interest in what you are doing, it makes all the time I spent on this compiler in 2012-2013 totally worth it. BTW, I have some things I am working on right now but I am really

Re: flexjs game hugryhero

Ha, nice Renaun did this game back with Randori compiler and it worked great 3 years ago. One of the main reasons I put some much time into getting externs to work and why I wrote EXTERNC to generate the js.swc was this example right here with webgl. So hats off to you lizhi! You are doing a

Re: flexjs game hugryhero

an online example of the current FlexJS store app? Mike On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 1/21/16, 8:24 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >If/when you have time, could yo

Re: flexjs game hugryhero

. If you don't have time, that is fine. I am getting interested in some audio experiements... (WebAudio) Mike On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 1/21/16, 2:43 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote

Re: Names for FlexJS MXML

Agreed, MXML is a markup language and it it's AST form really has nothing to do with SWF, JS or AS, it's it's own language spec. This is why JS can be gleaned from the same thing AS is. I know I am stating the obvious but man, working with MXML since Josh released it for Feathers has been some of

Re: Policy on commiting unit tests?

Which project? I have used @Ignore in the past. You could do that and point to the test file and method name in the JIRA issue. (if this is Falcon) Mike On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Andy Dufilie wrote: > I would like to write some unit tests for issues I know

[FalconJX] unit tests

I just did a super clean on compiler, compiler.jx and compiler.jx.tests then a build and I have 14 failing unit tests out of 1250. Do these tests use asjs repo for anything? Mike

Re: [FalconJX] unit tests

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 1/14/16, 12:17 PM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >I just did a super clean on compiler, compiler.jx and compiler.jx.tests > >then a b

Re: [FLEXJS] Build failure significant

Alex for the explanation of how I fixed > it. > > - Josh > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Michael Schmalle < > teotigraphix...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > Josh, I have much experience with this identifier vrs. function call > stuff > > in the compil

Re: [FLEXJS] Build failure significant

Josh, I have much experience with this identifier vrs. function call stuff in the compiler. I pulled my hair out when initally implementing the Identifier emitter and in the end made it as dumb as possible. I was looking at your commits, and read this, can you exactly explain what was failing ,

Re: Welcome Andy Dufilie as Apache Flex Commiter

> ActionScript. Alex has fixed many of the problems I've run into, and I'm > > looking forward to fixing more myself. I want to help make FlexJS a > solid > > alternative to TypeScript and other languages targeting JavaScript. > > > > Andy > > > > On

Re: [FalconJX] Is it time to delete the FalconJS code?

; Does anybody have an actual set of steps to create some sort of archival > branch or can I just delete this project? > > -Alex > > On 12/21/15, 7:50 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >Well garbage is relative. I didn't mean

Re: Welcome Andy Dufilie as Apache Flex Commiter

Heh, I noticed that last commit and it wasn't a pull request! Welcome Andy and it's great you are working on the compiler. Can you tell us a little about what you are aiming to do with your projects? Mike On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Harbs wrote: > Welcome Andy! >

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] "as" keyword handling

In the Randori compiler, I wrote the emitter to strip the cast during the emit stage. Mike On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Josh Tynjala wrote: > I wonder if we could define some kind of special global function that would > make the compiler and IDEs happy with

Re: [FLEXJS] FlexJS Event in San Francisco

To bad you can't have a portion streaming with some chat. On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Jason Taylor wrote: > I'll be there > > -Original Message- > From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] > Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 6:28 PM > To: dev@flex.apache.org;

Re: [GitHub] flex-falcon pull request: (relating to js.swc) Return type with te...

I'm not setup for doing merges right now but this looks good for anybody else that wants to. Didn't think about using any instead of Object. You might find more little things like this, when I wrote this compiler, I was mainly looking to get it "working", didn't go through it deep. On Thu, Dec

Re: [FlexJS] npm install flexjs

Just shooting in the dark but some type of Java version conflict? It seems familiar to me like that could be a possibility. Mike On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 4:34 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > I have this working locally. If the user has npm and Java installed on > their

Re: [FalconJX] Is it time to delete the FalconJS code?

Yup, I agree, it doesn't really need to be deleted but it needs to be so far away from FalconJX that a common dev wouldn't mistake it for anything other than archived history. The code is garbage, another reason why FalconJX even exists, I hated that code with a passion. :) Mike On Mon, Dec 21,

Re: [FalconJX] Is it time to delete the FalconJS code?

ll runs several of the phases > of the CompilationUnit code that we may need to stop doing some day for > performance reasons and go through another round of bug fixing when we do, > because semantic errors seem to be caught during reduction. FalconJS was > leveraging the CompilationU

Re: [FlexJS] No more JS!

Nice, this is great for me, my time writing the externs compiler actually helped you out. I know I sound a but self centered here but your paragraph above is exactly the thing I was thinking about when I wrote the initial "proposal" for doing it. So anyway, I think you can recall the

Re: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons

IIRC most of the projects have some pretty thorough unit tests as well. Mike On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 2:14 PM, jude wrote: > +1 for renaming it. make it part of the main package. that way we have to > commit to it. if we put it off to the side there's more "it's a side >

Re: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons

I use the async library in my feathers app right now. Some of the utilities as well. The authors of all the librariues are top rate. :) BTW, as3commons-asblocks, haha that was me that wrote all that! ;-) Mike On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Nice find.

Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)

sounds amazing. > > > > > >One question for me is what you refer as "externs". Could you share what > > >this means? > > > > Externs are like header files for JS libraries. Michael Schmalle made it > > possible to create a SWC like our js.swc that con

Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > On 12/1/15, 2:27 PM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Anyway, I wish I had some projects for FlexJS/FlaconJX but my story is > >still the same. I am

Re: FlexJS Brand Positioning

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Josh Tynjala wrote: > Yeah, I guess that's an unfortunate naming similarity to Adobe's abandoned > "ActionScript Next". I hadn't even made the association. Regardless, I'm > not concerned with a little temporary disappointment. Doing

Re: AS3JS

He obviously knows about this project and would have chimed in if he was remotely interested in contributing. IMHO -1 because he has already put massive time into his implementation and likes the fact he controls how it evolves. If this project is interested in Node.js, then it's all open source

Re: [FlexJS][FalconJX] Internal Classes

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 11/16/15, 2:04 PM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >Is there some one else working on the compiler code other than you Alex? > > Josh has ma

Re: [FlexJS][FalconJX] Internal Classes

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Looks like the work would be: > > 1) add the wrapping function > 2) change all method and property output to not include the package. > > Is it worth it just to try to get better privacy? I think just adding an > inner class

Re: [FlexJS][FalconJX] Internal Classes

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 11/16/15, 2:38 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >It's important. You need to figure out how to do it in JS first, then bend > >the co

Re: [FlexJS][FalconJX] Internal Classes

It's important. You need to figure out how to do it in JS first, then bend the compiler to your will. :) In a SWF decompile, these are labeled private class. Mike On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 2:53 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > Hi, > > Every once in a while, the framework code uses an

Re: [FlexJS][FalconJX] Internal Classes

. :) > Thanks, > Om > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Michael Schmalle < > teotigraphix...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:14 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala < > bigosma...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > >

Re: [FlexJS][FalconJX] Internal Classes

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:14 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > Purely pedantic, but the code does not do anything to 'enforce' the > singleton-ness of the class. > The compiler won't even let you compile this code, so the != is just sauce that never gets eaten. Since you

Re: [FlexJS][FalconJX] Internal Classes

and you can tell if it's being passed in a Function/Method call at compile time. Mike > > On Nov 16, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Michael Schmalle <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 5:40 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala < > bigosma...@gmail.com> > &

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.5.0 RC3

FYI to those reading, I hope to have some more time in a month or two to do some dev on the compiler. I have been out straight with life and my other business stuff so I haven't been able to have my head into this project as far as the compiler is concerned. I have been reading all the dev posts

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.5.0 RC3

Seems suspicious, the tests run in alphabetical order I think and that is probably the first one in the MXML tests? I know when I didn't have the debugger setup right, the compiler tests would fail right there. Mike On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > In the

Re: [FlexJS] internal namespace

> But to me, the advantages of abstracting implementations with Interfaces outweighs the effort to “fake” namespaces in the JS side. This is essentially a namespace anyway. The interface is the namespace, if you make the framework interface centric, then casting to the concrete type is the public

Re: [FalconJX] Compiler bugs (was

in and making it easier for them to get started would be good. -ALex On 8/19/15, 2:59 PM, Michael Schmalle teotigraphix...@gmail.com wrote: My family just left today and I had lighting strike out powerline which fried our router, just got internet back after 3 days. :) Still a bunch of stuff todo, I

Re: [FlexJS] jsc doesn't follow typical compiler naming convention...

As much as I hate hyphens, to me we are dealing with a cross compiler from one language to anther. I would vote for; as-jsc mxml-jsc read as ActionScript To JavaScript compiler MXML To JavaScript compiler Mike On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote: On

Re: [FalconJX] Compiler bugs (was

My family just left today and I had lighting strike out powerline which fried our router, just got internet back after 3 days. :) Still a bunch of stuff todo, I will keep watching this thread for you to finish everything, haha. Tests! Nice Mike On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Alex Harui

Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)

On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 1:06 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote: On 8/8/15, 12:38 PM, Michael Schmalle teotigraphix...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Frédéric THOMAS webdoubl...@hotmail.com wrote: Also, What to do to keep as doc, I've been trying -keep-asdoc

Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)

On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Frédéric THOMAS webdoubl...@hotmail.com wrote: Also, What to do to keep as doc, I've been trying -keep-asdoc but Fred, I looked at the code quickly, this should work right now and -keep-asdoc is ONLY for the @param description etc. The fact you are not even

Re: [FalconJX] Compiler bugs (was

is still going I would love to. We have known of each other for more than a decade now!(Alex included) :) Mike - Josh On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote: On 8/7/15, 12:09 PM, Michael Schmalle teotigraphix...@gmail.com wrote: It seems like

[FalconJX] Compiler bugs (was

On 8/7/15, 8:55 AM, Frédéric THOMAS webdoubl...@hotmail.com wrote: Another thing I would have liked to do before the release is to modify the front compiler to avoid to have 2 build configurations in IJ when working with externs but not sure I will have the time, I'm quite busy at the moment and

Re: [FalconJX] Compiler bugs (was

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote: On 8/7/15, 12:09 PM, Michael Schmalle teotigraphix...@gmail.com wrote: It seems like these issues Alex or I am about the only people qualified to fix them? Well, others can certainly learn, and Darrell and/or Gordon

Re: Feathers prototype with CreateJS built with JSC from FlexJS

Never thought I would see this; https://twitter.com/gskinner/status/626806909849354240 Mike On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote: On 7/28/15, 1:29 PM, Josh Tynjala joshtynj...@gmail.com wrote: Here's the root class from the demo:

Re: [FlexJS][FalconJX] Ready for another release?

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 1:42 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote: IMO, both Flash Builder and IntelliJ are saying the same thing: “show us that folks want it, then we’ll look into it”. It is a chicken and egg problem. IMHO the chicken and egg thing is actually how many people are

Re: [FlexJS][FalconJX] Ready for another release?

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 6:02 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala bigosma...@gmail.com wrote: +1 for a release of FlexJS. It would be great to highlight and talk about the new version of FlexJS at ApacheCon Europe on Oct 1st, 2015. I have been talking to various folks (outside of Apache) about FlexJS.

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >