I have noticed that the Geronimo assemblies do not have the needed legal
files, mainly the LICENSE / NOTICE files and maybe third party licenses
that are not ASL 2.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
repositories.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
+1
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I have put some binaries of the new xbean-2.3 release.
They are available at http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/xbean-2.3/
[ ] +1 Release the binary as XBean 2.3
[ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
If the vote passes, I will put the binaries
All jars are available from the repos listed.
However public repositories are often slow and you have to retry until
you download all the needed dependencies. While you have a
Connection timed out errors, you need to retry ...
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 5/2/06, emicalc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Could you please paste the full porttypedef.wsdl ?
I have just checked and I have the namespace declaration on the
wsdl:definitions tag and at other locations too..
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 5/2/06, Tomas Olsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have looked at the WSDL from the running broker
PXE integration is broken.
You may want to look at servicemix-bpe in the meantime (available in
3.0 distributions)
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 5/4/06, emicalc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have tried to run the BPEL Example on servicemix-2.0.2.
This example doesn't work...
This is the error
The VOTE results are
5 +1, no +0, no -1.
I have published the binaries at
http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/org.apache.xbean/
http://www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository/org/apache/xbean/
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I have put some binaries of the new
I haven't seen any geronimo plugin for m2 in head.
That whould be very usefull, especially because Geronimo plugins have to
be in a m2 layout, but the only tools to create a car is a m1 plugin.
Any idea ?
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Aaron Mulder wrote:
I'd rather handle the ApacheDS integration
to write them for 1.1 before of the m2 switch.
Is there any beginning of implementation available somewhere ?
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
All work related to M2 was halted until the trunk was merged. M2
packaging plugin would require transferring all M2 work to 1.1. I do
What are the ant files used for ?
And why changing the test class names ? Surefire can be configured
specifically if needed ... So this change could be delayed.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Hi Matt,
Moving the M2 conversion work from the trunk to 1.1 should
+1
Guillaume
James Strachan wrote:
We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it
out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release
requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc)
far has been to be fully J2EE compliant,
but all these points fall into the ease of use category and could /
should be addressed.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Aaron Mulder wrote:
Any objections to supporting different module types (such as Geronimo
service JARs or future Spring or ServiceMix
Snapshots are not uploaded on public repos.
But they are available at
http://people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-j2ee_1.4_spec/1.1-SNAPSHOT/
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
I wish it was true! Prasad has agreed ;) to take
there is no backport of the new UUID class.
AFAIK, the UUID has been backported and is available in 1.0.4 release
of retrotranslator (at least).
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
So I'd recommend folks run their unit tests on the backported code
just to be sure things all work.
AFAIK, all specs poms have been changed and even specs with no code changed
have been upgraded with a minor release to reflect the pom change.
These changes were mainly about unneeded transitive dependencies.
So I think all specs should be re-released.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Hiram Chirino
the XBEAN-13 patch and merging the branch to
trunk for XBEAN-14.
Please vote.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
)
is not compatible with Apache license because it mandates derivative work to
be licenced under LGPL.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 6/6/06, gioppo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
could you explain me a little better this licence situation?
Why apache projects can't accept LGPL stuff?
Thanks
Luca
--
View
FYI, if you have ASF license header in the pom, it will be removed by
the release plugin
during the release process (before tagging if I recall) ...
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 6/6/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Prasad has been working for a long time
Where can I find this RC ?
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 6/7/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've been busy little beavers this evening and would like to share
the fruits of our labor.
...
Its late and I'm probably missing something so
Shouldn't they include at least the ASF license, a NOTICE file and
maybe third party licenses ?
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 6/7/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where can I find this RC ?
Pick your favorite one at http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom
jiras for these problems.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Shouldn't they include at least the ASF license, a NOTICE file and
maybe third party licenses ?
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 6/7/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where can I find
I guess it should be 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT then ;)
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Rick McGuire wrote:
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
for a SPEC change (unless there was a bug) it makes more sense for a
full point release change and not a dot release. Dot releases should
be limited to bug, stability
The jboss deployer for servicemix 3.0 is available at Codehaus.
See http://servicemix.goopen.org/site/source.html to access the sources.
We do not have binaries available, so you will have to compile it (using
maven 1).
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 6/8/06, OscarGhersi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
)
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
3. Numerous bug fixes are being addressed. Excellent.
Apart from Spec issue above I think we have most everything
addressed. Does this list of outstanding items and release plan make
sense?
Matt
+1
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
David Jencks wrote:
I've uploaded
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12335128/geronimo-
deployment-plugin-RTC-VOTE.2.patch
incorporating most of your comments, see below.
Thanks for the review!
david jencks
On Jun 6, 2006, at 11:57 PM, Jacek
)
* xbean-jaxb (dependency not found)
* xbean-jmx (snapshot dep)
* xbean-oxm (empty)
* xbean-sca (snapshot dep)
So unless otherwise instructed, I would include xbean-finder in the main
build before releasing
and not release the other modules.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
at codehaus. I think it would give the needed transparency, as
I guess all the problems
come from here.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Aaron Mulder wrote:
Please distinguish between plugin source code, plugin binaries, and
plugin documentation. Which of these do you think should be hosted at
Apache
/apache/geronimo/specs
(which is a m2 repo synced with public repos).
Most of the specs have been released in 1.0.1 to fix m2 dependencies, so
if we do not have m2 poms ...
It would also benefit the m2 build in trunk which have to use them.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Over
If your application need to start thousands jobs, I bet you willprefer to create them programmatically instead of having to deploy them.IMaybe the deployer should only create the job and let quartz store it in the database.
The only problem is that when the job is undeployed, you have to remove
comments)
If the vote passes, I will put the binaries in their official
distribution repositories.
Here is my +1
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
and NOTICE files in svn head).Cheers,Guillaume Nodet
I will be travelling today so I will address these issues tonight and cut a final RC tonightassuming all the above issues are resolved.I have moved 49 JIRAs into 1.1.1 that I plan to address and respin a 1.1.1
within 3 weeks.Scheduleto
+1, seems fine to me.
Btw, would it be easier for the m2 migration, to create a branch, where
the RTC would not apply, and then merge all in trunk ?
I guess this could also apply to some features that requires a
significant number of patches...
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Prasad Kashyap wrote
The stax api which is hosted at codehaus is ASL 2 and does not have anyNOTICE file included, so my best guess is that there is nothing to do for this one.Cheers,Guillaume Nodet
On 6/13/06, Dave Colasurdo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Colasurdo wrote: John Sisson wrote: 6. Third Party Licenses.This
NOTICE file included, so my best guess is that there is nothing to do for this one. Cheers, Guillaume Nodet
On 6/13/06, *Dave Colasurdo* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Colasurdo wrote: John Sisson wrote: 6. Third Party Licenses.This needs to be reviewed and the appropriate
I will change my +1 to a -1.It seems I have introduced some incompatibilities with jdk 1.4, so that xbean can only run on jdk 5.These are easy to fix, to i will recut a release asap.Cheers,Guillaume Nodet
On 6/13/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have pushed XBean 2.4 binaries
the binaries in their official
distribution repositories by the end of the weekHere is my non binding +1
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Note** Once David makes the final changes to remove assembly you will
need to follow the new process for building in assemblies.
Joe
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Just wanted to let you know that the style of the console seems a bit
bugged under both firefox and IE.
This is a geronimo snapshot from
I'd like to know if we have to rename the packages to
org.apache.servicemix.* or if we can keep the current ones
org.servicemix.*.
I think that we also have to modify the headers of all sources to
include apache license, but i want to be sure about that.
Also what copyright should be used, as
I'd like to know if we have to rename the packages to
org.apache.servicemix.* or if we can keep the current ones
org.servicemix.*.
I think that we also have to modify the headers of all sources to
include apache license, but i want to be sure about that.
Also what copyright should be used, as
They are redirected to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Guillaume
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 23:10 +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
In svn head is a fully fonctional implentation WS-Notification 1.3
Public Review Draft 1 from 07 July 2005
which support:
* pull style notifications
-12-21 at 00:05 +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
They are redirected to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK .. is there any reason why they can't/shouldn't be sent to -dev?
Sanjiva.
Keep 2.1 version number (provide specific comments)
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
The tooling\servicemix-web module is used as a demo of ServiceMix
integration in a web-app.
I'd like to move it to the distribution so that users to not need to
download all the sources and build it manually.
Any thoughts ?
Guillaume Nodet
Cool, that would be awesome !
I 'm looking forward to try it and integrate it in ServiceMix.
Thanks for this great contribution !
Guys, what are the next steps ?
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
cory wrote:
Hi,
The ServiceMix project provides a good JBI platform but its currently
lacking a service
+1
Guillaume Nodet
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
The XBean project has voted to donate all of the code located at
https://svn.codehaus.org/xbean (view with fisheye http://
cvs.codehaus.org/viewrep/xbean) to Apache Geronimo. The completed IP
clearance check list can be found here https
+1
Guillaume
James Strachan wrote:
We have received the generous donation of a complete and working BPE
engine to the ServiceMix project...
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-servicemix-dev/
200602.mbox/%
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the contributor has offered to donate to Apache
Yes, I may have a bit off the track.
Thanks for the clarification.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
David Jencks (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1574?page=comments#action_12364982 ]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-1574
to reintegrate ServiceMix inside geronimo.
Should i put them in the geronimo build and add a dependency on
servicemix-3.0-SNAPSHOT ?
In 1.0 branch or trunk ? or both ?
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Kevan Miller wrote:
My day to look at incubator proposals... ;-)
James,
FYI, the ServiceMix
console.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
2006/2/1, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Agreed. Apache ServiceMix is already integrated into Geronimo to
provide these same ESB capabilities using the underlying Geronimo
services like HTTP, JMS, JCA etc.
Hi James,
Whenever
for the thread where the transaction
is started / resumed, if none exists already. This implementation can
easily be used by the existing spring JtaTransactionManager.
The gbeans written for ServiceMix do use this implementation.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
[1]
http://cvs.codehaus.org/viewrep
See
http://www.mail-archive.com/servicemix-dev%40geronimo.apache.org/msg00030.html
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great!
I'm assuming the source won't be available for review unless/until Ode is
accepted as an incubator poddling?
Ian
It's better to be hated for who you
,
Guillaume Nodet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James,
I'm afraid I'm not as familiar with JBI as I probably should be (which is
to say not at all). Would leveraging JBI to do Ode's heavy lifting
introduce a dependency on ServiceMix and/or JBI into Ode, or is it merely a
Java-based interface to BPEL
Sorry, I may have missed something ..
Are you suggesting that the project start with 0 committers and that
everyone should be brought in by submitting patches ? ;)
What are the proposed criteria for selecting initial committers ?
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Hmm...Can we
Don't worry ...
The core container has been written to run on jdk 1.4.
A few minor errors from me will be fixed, that's all.
Some components are written using jaxb2 and thus depends on jdk 5
until retrotranslator works fine, in which case the same code will run
on 1.4.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
-SNAPSHOT.jar
geronimo-qname_1.1_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
And it seems that the trunk for the specs still is 1.0...
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Chris Cardona wrote:
Just fixed the problem by doing an svn update (getting
revision 379648). Looks like I checked out in the
middle of some source checkin
Sorry, i have deleted my source dir and checkout a new one
and everything works now ...
It seems that parts of my source tree were on the 1.0 branch ...
Guillaume
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Anyone knows where I can download the 1.1-SNAPSHOT version
of the specs ? Some of them are uploaded
: if the ME should be persisted
* synchronous : if the ME has been sent synchronously (the jca flow
can not handle such cases)
* clustered : if the endpoint is remote (or local + remote)
The last point will need http://jira.activemq.org/jira/browse/SM-149 to
be fixed.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 12/5/06, Roger Menday [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guillaume Nodet (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-751?page=comments#action_37501 ]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-751:
Btw, looking at the patch, I was wondering
.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
for the following components:
- HTTP binding component: here I added the code to generate the
correlation Id and set it in the Message Exchange
- Splitter
- Router (the lightweight component)
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
.
The major issue is the remote repo. Once you eliminate that, then
mvn starts to look a whole lot more attractive for serious production
builds.
--jason
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
.
It is really too bad that there is not a local repo for deps and then
a local repo for generated artifacts. The whole local repo thing is
lossy IMO and makes it very difficult to assure quality of releases.
--jason
On Dec 11, 2006, at 7:55 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Also, keep in mind
/1.2.0-beta
Here's my +1!
-dain
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
?
thanks
david jencks
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
, they end up in the local
repo with a timestamp, and my guess is that they are not found.
Unfortunately, the exception thrown just says that the configuration
could not be loaded, which is not very helpful.
On 12/14/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not completely aware of what the car
Yeah, sorry, this was written at least 3 times in your mail :(
On 12/14/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 14, 2006, at 10:43 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Do you have a pointer to the m2 repo containing all these artifacts
please ?
http://people.apache.org/~dain/stage/
-dain
/repos/asf/geronimo/genesis/tags/genesis-1.1
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/tags/javamail-1.0
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/1.2.0-beta
Here's my +1!
-dain
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
process
[ ] +/- 0
[ ] -1 Don't release xbean 2.8 now
Here's my +1.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 12/18/06, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 18, 2006, at 11:25 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I'm starting a vote to release XBean 2.8.
There has not been much changes since 2.7, but a few
bugs fixed, and the addition of the xbean-finder module.
Anyway, the bugs are important
I've fixed the missing / bad ASF headers and use the new maven
plugin to generate LICENSE/NOTICE file.
On 12/18/06, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 18, 2006, at 1:31 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
On 12/18/06, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 18, 2006, at 11:25 AM
://www.nabble.com/sm-3.0-build-fails-under-java-6-tf2842650s12049.html#a7937393
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Done :)
On 12/18/06, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 18, 2006, at 3:44 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've fixed the missing / bad ASF headers and use the new maven
plugin to generate LICENSE/NOTICE file.
Looks like the following still needs some attention:
xbean-spring-v1
release a 4.1.1 ?
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
I guess we can wait a bit to upgrade to the upcoming xbean 2.8
which fixes the xml schema generation -- they can not be
used :( atm
On 12/19/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to release jencks 2.0 and servicemix 3.1, but I'm a little reluctant
to do so because both make
where we are at.
Other people's thoughts?
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
The vote has passed with 7 +1s.
I have thus released XBean 2.8 and
binaries have been uploaded to the m2 repo at:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/xbean/
Thanks !
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Any idea why the artifacts for 1.2-beta have not been uploaded
to the usual repository yet ?
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
to the whole spec tree, or any other subproject as a whole ?
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
do a dry run on a
trash release and look at the results to see if we are happy with the
outcome.
Regards,
Alan
On Dec 21, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I think voting on svn source for small projects / jars is good,
because people can build them locally, check that everything
is ok
).
--jason
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Message-
From: Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 00:15:39
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release process change
On Dec 22, 2006, at 7:01 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
On Dec 22, 2006, at 2:57 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
From what I understand, the problem you
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-896
The mailing list has been created a while ago, but the
svn repository has just been created.
If you have signed a NDA, you need to send a mail to
jcp-open to ask for permissions on this svn area.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/REG.JBI-Component-tf2945358s12049.html#a8236236
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Forgot to foward to dev ...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Jan 12, 2007 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: log4j
To: Thomas TERMIN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yeah, looks good. I will try it now.
What about using a spring Resource instead of a String ?
I think
]
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/)
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
more
Thanks,
Smruti
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/DeployServiceAssemblyTask-Problem%21%21%21-tf3032930s12049.html#a8426881
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Architect, LogicBlaze
.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/)
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
(and perhaps adding the
repositories I find to the top-level pom).
Thanks in advance,
Ciao,
Philipp Rossmanith
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. Any unauthorised
copying, use or distribution of this information is strictly prohibited.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
unauthorised
copying, use or distribution of this information is strictly prohibited.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/)
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
unauthorised
copying, use or distribution of this information is strictly prohibited.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/)
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
/2.1/).
Agreed, this may be a good idea.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/)
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
I have create a branch and a tag for 3.1 release.
The trunk has moved to 3.2-SNAPSHOT.
I will upload the binaries asap and will start
a vote once done.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/)
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/servicemix/apache-servicemix-web/3.1-incubating/apache-servicemix-web-3.1-incubating.war
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/)
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Just a note: *everyone* is encouraged to download, try and vote,
not only developers or PPMCers (thought their vote would be non-binding).
On 1/30/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have uploaded the servicemix 3.1 release to the incubating
repostiory. Please, take some time
Actually, the version used is more of a snapshot on 4.1.1.
It fixes a critical bug for using the JCA flow in servicemix.
4.1 has been released some time ago.
On 1/31/07, Renaud Bruyeron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Just a note: *everyone* is encouraged to download, try
.
Please, report any problem.
On 1/29/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The confluence wiki space is being moved
to the ASF. Please refrain from
editing it, as all changes will be lost.
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1139
for the status.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
-- Forwarded message --
From: Guillaume Nodet (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Jan 31, 2007 11:57 PM
Subject: [jira] Created: (INFRA-1144) Move activemq svn repo to its
final destination
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Move activemq svn repo to its final destination
it will be solved soon.
Please, report any problem.
On 1/29/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The confluence wiki space is being moved
to the ASF. Please refrain from
editing it, as all changes will be lost.
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1139
for the status
-incubating-repository/org/apache/servicemix/apache-servicemix/3.1-incubating/
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/servicemix/apache-servicemix-web/3.1-incubating/
Please download, review and vote ...
This vote will be closed on sunday, midnight GMT
--
Cheers,
Guillaume
/trunk/tooling/servicemix-jsr181-annotated-service-unit'
doesn't exist
---
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/)
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
201 - 300 of 2485 matches
Mail list logo
