Hey St.Ack
Thanks for clarifications,
For 4. replay of log: (Please correct if i'm wrong)
So the RS will:
a. split the log via HLogSplitter, write concurrently log content to other
log files under each region,
b. replay those smaller logs into its own memstore and own logs (is it done
when the
to block release.
Jon.
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 4:26 PM, lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com wrote:
The third 0.94.0 RC is available for download here:
http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.0-rc3/
(My gpg key is available from pgp.mit.edu. Key id: 7CA45750)
HBase 0.94 is a performance release
See Inline..
Regards
Ram
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Hsieh [mailto:j...@cloudera.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 9:35 PM
To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl
Subject: Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available
for download
[Apparently I'm a little
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Mikael Sitruk mikael.sit...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey St.Ack
Thanks for clarifications,
For 4. replay of log: (Please correct if i'm wrong)
So the RS will:
a. split the log via HLogSplitter, write concurrently log content to other
log files under each region,
(Moved this conversation off the vote thread)
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Mikael Sitruk mikael.sit...@gmail.com wrote:
So in case a RS goes down, the master will split the log and reassign the
regions to other RS, then each RS will replay the log, during this step the
regions are
: Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available
for download
OK, I'll change my tactic :)
If there are no -1's by Wed, May 16th, I'll release RC4 as 0.94.0.
-- Lars
- Original Message -
From: Stack st...@duboce.net
To: lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com
Cc
-Original Message-
From: Ramkrishna.S.Vasudevan [mailto:ramkrishna.vasude...@huawei.com]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 11:48 AM
To: dev@hbase.apache.org; 'lars hofhansl'
Subject: RE: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available
for download
Hi
We (it includes the test team here
'
Subject: RE: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available
for download
Hi
We (it includes the test team here) 0.94 RC and carried out various
operations on it.
Puts, Scans, and all the restart scenarios (using kill -9 also). Even
the
encoding stuffs were tested
From: Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 7:17 AM
Subject: Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available for
download
Thanks for sharing this information, Ramkrishna.
Dictionary WAL compression makes replication not functional
if I cut a new RC now.
-- Lars
From: Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 7:17 AM
Subject: Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available for
download
Thanks for sharing this information
; lars hofhansl
Subject: Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available
for download
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 8:15 AM, lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com
wrote:
It's default off. I'd say we just say it's an experimental feature in
the release notes.
+1 for calling
: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available for
download
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:26 PM, lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks Stack.
So that's two +1 (mine doesn't count I guess). And no -1.
Why doesn't yours count? Usually the RMs does, if they +1 it. So
Thanks for the clarifications St.Ack.
Still I have some questions in regards of 3 in scenario discussed - when a
region is offline it means that client operation are not possible on it
(even read)?
In case a second master is up (in an environment with multiple master), i
presume all this occurs
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Mikael Sitruk mikael.sit...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the clarifications St.Ack.
Still I have some questions in regards of 3 in scenario discussed - when a
region is offline it means that client operation are not possible on it
(even read)?
Correct.
In
Hi St.Ack
You asked for it :-)
So in case a RS goes down, the master will split the log and reassign the
regions to other RS, then each RS will replay the log, during this step the
regions are unavailable, and clients will got exceptions.
1. how the master will choose a RS to assign a region?
2.
Stack hi
Sorry for not being precise enough.
The point is that i'm trying to check the impact of HA scenarios. one of
them is when the master goes down.
That is true that the Master is not it the critical path of read/write
unless (please correct me if i'm wrong):
1. new client are trying to
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Mikael Sitruk mikael.sit...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for not being precise enough.
The point is that i'm trying to check the impact of HA scenarios. one of
them is when the master goes down.
That is true that the Master is not it the critical path of read/write
From: Stack st...@duboce.net
To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 9:15 PM
Subject: Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available for
download
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 4:26 PM, lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com wrote
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:26 PM, lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks Stack.
So that's two +1 (mine doesn't count I guess). And no -1.
Why doesn't yours count? Usually the RMs does, if they +1 it. So,
that'd be 3x+1 + a non-binding +1.
I talked to Ram offline, and we'll fix
sinking the current one.
Regards
Ram
-Original Message-
From: lars hofhansl [mailto:lhofha...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 6:27 AM
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Subject: Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available
for download
Gentle reminder to please
-Original Message-
From: lars hofhansl [mailto:lhofha...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 6:27 AM
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Subject: Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available
for download
Gentle reminder to please provide your votes.
(and actually
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Ramkrishna.S.Vasudevan
ramkrishna.vasude...@huawei.com wrote:
But older version has a filehandler leak in DN side for which Todd has
provided fix in hadoop side. Refer to HDFS-3359. We can easily reproduce
this problem if we have a multiple column family table
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 10:01:20 -0700
Subject: Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available for
download
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
CC: lhofha...@yahoo.com; ram_krish...@hotmail.com
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Ramkrishna.S.Vasudevan
ramkrishna.vasude...@huawei.com
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 4:26 PM, lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com wrote:
The third 0.94.0 RC is available for download here:
http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.0-rc3/
(My gpg key is available from pgp.mit.edu. Key id: 7CA45750)
I'm +1 on this RC going out as 0.94.0. On the hadoop
PM, lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com wrote:
The third 0.94.0 RC is available for download here:
http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.0-rc3/
(My gpg key is available from pgp.mit.edu. Key id: 7CA45750)
I'm +1 on this RC going out as 0.94.0. On the hadoop 2.0.0 issues,
I'm w/ Andy
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Mikael Sitruk mikael.sit...@gmail.com wrote:
Stack do you have latency graph during the time the RS and HMaster were
down? (did you see a big variance in latency)?
Not sure I follow Mikael. The master is not in the read/write path so
its restart wouldn't
Gentle reminder to please provide your votes.
(and actually this is 4th RC, rather than the third)
-- Lars
From: lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com
To: hbase-dev dev@hbase.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 4:26 PM
Subject: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release
: Todd Lipcon t...@cloudera.com
To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl
lhofha...@yahoo.com
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 9:35 PM
Subject: Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release
candidate
is
available
, May 7, 2012 11:07 AM
Subject: Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available
for download
Sorry everything is in elapsed time as reported by Elapsed time in
milliseconds. So higher is worse.
The standard deviation on 0.92.1 writes is 4,591,384 so Write 5 is a little
outside
; lars hofhansl
lhofha...@yahoo.com
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 9:35 PM
Subject: Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release
candidate
is
available
for download
+1 from me, I took it for a spin on the local filesystem
- Original Message -
From: Todd Lipcon t...@cloudera.com
To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl
lhofha...@yahoo.com
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 9:35 PM
Subject: Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release
candidate
: The third hbase 0.94.0 release
candidate
is
available
for download
+1 from me, I took it for a spin on the local
filesystem
with
some
YCSB
load.
Here is my signature on the non-secure tarball
-
From: Todd Lipcon t...@cloudera.com
To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 9:35 PM
Subject: Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is
available
for download
+1 from me, I took it for a spin
- Original Message -
From: Todd Lipcon t...@cloudera.com
To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 9:35 PM
Subject: Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is
available
for download
+1
...@yahoo.com
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 9:35 PM
Subject: Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is
available
for download
+1 from me, I took it for a spin on the local filesystem with some
YCSB
load.
Here is my signature on the non
- Original Message -
From: Todd Lipcon t...@cloudera.com
To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 9:35 PM
Subject: Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available
for download
+1 from me, I took it for a spin
...@yahoo.com
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 9:35 PM
Subject: Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available
for download
+1 from me, I took it for a spin on the local filesystem with some YCSB
load.
Here is my signature on the non-secure tarball.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available
for download
+1 from me, I took it for a spin on the local filesystem with some YCSB
load.
Here is my signature on the non-secure tarball.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEABECAAYFAk
then be pulled straight from that tag.
-- Lars
- Original Message -
From: Todd Lipcon t...@cloudera.com
To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 9:35 PM
Subject: Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release
The third 0.94.0 RC is available for download here:
http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.0-rc3/
(My gpg key is available from pgp.mit.edu. Key id: 7CA45750)
HBase 0.94 is a performance release, and there are some interesting new
features as well.
It is wire compatible with 0.92.x. 0.92
PM, lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com wrote:
The third 0.94.0 RC is available for download here:
http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.0-rc3/
(My gpg key is available from pgp.mit.edu. Key id: 7CA45750)
HBase 0.94 is a performance release, and there are some interesting new
features
hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 9:35 PM
Subject: Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available for
download
+1 from me, I took it for a spin on the local filesystem with some YCSB
load.
Here is my signature on the non-secure tarball.
-BEGIN PGP
I hate to do this but I think this sinks this rc:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5861
Jon.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:20 PM, lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com wrote:
The third 0.94.0 RC is available for download here:
http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.0-rc2/
I signed
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com wrote:
I hate to do this but I think this sinks this rc:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5861
Party-pooper!
I put up some questions in the issue Jon.
Good on you,
St.Ack
...@yahoo.com
Cc:
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 10:46 AM
Subject: Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available for
download
I hate to do this but I think this sinks this rc:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5861
Jon.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:20 PM, lars hofhansl
Thanks Lars. Will give it a go in next few days and get back on it.
Regards
Ram
-Original Message-
From: lars hofhansl [mailto:lhofha...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 4:51 AM
To: hbase-dev
Subject: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available for
download
this announcement.
RC2 to follow soon.
From: lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com
To: hbase-dev dev@hbase.apache.org
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 5:35 PM
Subject: ANN: The second hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available for
download
The second 0.94.0 RC is available
The second 0.94.0 RC is available for download here:
http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.0-rc1/
I signed the tarballs. My gpg key (signed by stack) is available from
pgp.mit.edu. Key id: 7CA45750
HBase 0.94 is a performance release with a few new features as well.
It is wire compatible
From: Jonathan Hsieh [j...@cloudera.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 7:01 AM
To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl
Subject: Re: ANN: The first hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available for
download
This looks like a bug in hdfs 0.23 shim later added to 0.23.0 in HDFS-2412
Would HBASE-5690 sink rc0 ?
compression does not work in Store.java of 0.94
Thanks
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:28 PM, lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com wrote:
The first 0.94.0 RC is available for download here:
http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.0-rc0/
(The tarballs are signed
...@yahoo.comwrote:
The first 0.94.0 RC is available for download here:
http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.0-rc0/
(The tarballs are signed by Stack this time, since I do not have a signed
Apache key, yet.)
HBase 0.94 is first and foremost a performance release with a few new
features
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:28 PM, lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com wrote:
The first 0.94.0 RC is available for download here:
http://people.apache.org/%7Elarsh/hbase-0.94.0-rc0/
(The tarballs are signed by Stack this time, since I do not have a signed
Apache key, yet.)
HBase 0.94 is first
29, 2012 9:27 PM
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Cc: lars hofhansl
Subject: Re: ANN: The first hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available
for download
To be clear, a rolling restart from 90 to 94 isn't expected to work.
But a shutdown and restart ought to. (If not, like Jon said, we'll be
fixing
mistake with this?
Regards
Ram
-Original Message-
From: Todd Lipcon [mailto:t...@cloudera.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 9:27 PM
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Cc: lars hofhansl
Subject: Re: ANN: The first hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available
for download
To be clear
: The first hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available for
download
Hi
When we tried to start the 0.94 version with hadoop 0.23.1 we got the
following exception stack trace.. Even 0.92.2 snapshot also had the same
problem.
2012-03-30 11:12:19,487 FATAL org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.HMaster
.
-- Lars
From: Ramkrishna.S.Vasudevan ramkrishna.vasude...@huawei.com
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Cc: 'lars hofhansl' lhofha...@yahoo.com
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 6:03 AM
Subject: RE: ANN: The first hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available
: Ramkrishna.S.Vasudevan ramkrishna.vasude...@huawei.com
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Cc: 'lars hofhansl' lhofha...@yahoo.com
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 6:03 AM
Subject: RE: ANN: The first hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available
for download
Hi
When we tried to start the 0.94 version
: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 5:11 PM
Subject: Re: ANN: The first hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available
for download
The change was for HBASE-5258
Incompatibility was expected.
Thanks
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Ted Yu
not test rolling upgrade to
0.94?
Thanks.
-- Lars
From: Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 5:11 PM
Subject: Re: ANN: The first hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available
for download
The change
@hbase.apache.org
Subject: Re: ANN: The first hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available
for download
I only used 0.94 for 20 minutes :-)
It worked during that time. So yes to all questions.
On Mar 28, 2012, at 9:14 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
Is it working for you Ted? You going
Thanks Lars and Jon.
I too expect the same to work. I will try testing it that way.
Regards
Ram
-Original Message-
From: lars hofhansl [mailto:lhofha...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 10:27 AM
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Subject: Re: ANN: The first hbase 0.94.0 release
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Nicolas Spiegelberg
nspiegelb...@fb.com wrote:
I'm advocating that RPC compatibility breakage is not acceptable for FB
because this is a vital and highly-deployed infrastructure piece. I'm
assuming this strategy may not be acceptable for other major
Late answer, I just came back from vacation.
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Nicolas Spiegelberg
nspiegelb...@fb.com wrote:
I think HFile upgrade in particular is more complicated than you think.
We currently have production traffic running with HFileV1. It has a 5-min
SLA. We can't afford
I think HFile upgrade in particular is more complicated than you think.
We currently have production traffic running with HFileV1. It has a
5-min
SLA. We can't afford to take the entire downtime to rewrite 100GB (or
whatever) worth of data. We need to do this while the cluster is live.
AFAIK
@hbase.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2012 5:24 PM
Subject: Re: hbase 0.94.0
I think HFile upgrade in particular is more complicated than you think.
We currently have production traffic running with HFileV1. It has a
5-min
SLA. We can't afford to take the entire downtime to rewrite 100GB (or
whatever
:37 PM
Subject: Re: hbase 0.94.0
Traditionally there have been no guarantees of cross major version
compatibility. RPC especially. Never a rolling upgrade from an 0.90 to an
0.92, for example. For persistent data, there is a migration utility for
upping from one major release to the next.
I'm
1) The trunk has more master work. Specifically 89-master related
features that we implemented for our grid architecture.
You have a list of issues Nicolas?
We have a list, but it's non-trivial. You're more than welcome to help if
you want. :)
2) Client/Server compatibility. Even if we
j...@cloudera.com
To: Matt Corgan mcor...@hotpads.com
Cc: lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com; dev dev@hbase.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: hbase 0.94.0
Lars, Matt,
I like Matt's suggestion -- as long as it is not a burden let's keep it in.
If it becomes one
@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 10:10 AM
Subject: Re: hbase 0.94.0
Lars,
The upcoming CDH4 Beta HBase will be based on the latest hotness,
0.92.0.
A CDH4 GA HBase will have to have an upgrade path from CDH3 HBase. If
that
HBase is 0.92 based
From: Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com
To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 10:10 AM
Subject: Re: hbase 0.94.0
Lars,
The upcoming CDH4 Beta HBase will be based on the latest hotness,
0.92.0.
A CDH4 GA
: lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com; Matt Corgan mcor...@hotpads.com
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: hbase 0.94.0
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
Initial results from HBASE-5074, support checksums in HBase block cache,
look promising
Subject: Re: hbase 0.94.0
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
Initial results from HBASE-5074, support checksums in HBase block
cache,
look promising.
Shall we discuss whether 0.94 should include it (assuming Dhruba can
finish
the feature in Feb
...@hotpads.com
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: hbase 0.94.0
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
Initial results from HBASE-5074, support checksums in HBase block
cache,
look promising.
Shall we discuss whether 0.94 should include
...@gmail.com
To: dev@hbase.apache.org; Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org
Cc: lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com; Matt Corgan mcor...@hotpads.com
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 11:46 AM
Subject: Re: hbase 0.94.0
Before long term wire and format compatibility is reached, I am -0 on time
based
Traditionally there have been no guarantees of cross major version
compatibility. RPC especially. Never a rolling upgrade from an 0.90 to an
0.92, for example. For persistent data, there is a migration utility for
upping from one major release to the next.
I'm advocating that RPC compatibility
Currently, Jon and me in Cloudera are trying to come up a proposal for
client server wire
compatibility and rolling upgrade support. We will share with the
community after we come
to some consensus internal at first. :)
Thanks,
Jimmy
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Nicolas Spiegelberg
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 10:10 AM
Subject: Re: hbase 0.94.0
Lars,
The upcoming CDH4 Beta HBase will be based on the latest hotness,
0.92.0.
A CDH4 GA HBase will have to have an upgrade path from CDH3 HBase. If
that
HBase is 0.92 based, we'll test that, and if timing works out and we
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Nicolas Spiegelberg
nspiegelb...@fb.com wrote:
1) The trunk has more master work. Specifically 89-master related
features that we implemented for our grid architecture. It sounds like
most of those features are rising in prominence in the Open Source
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Todd Lipcon t...@cloudera.com wrote:
Maybe the discussion should be whether 0.94 should be a time-gated or
feature-gated release? IMO we already have enough good stuff in there
on the perf front. It will be great if the checksum improvement makes
it, but if it
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Nicolas Spiegelberg
nspiegelb...@fb.com wrote:
However, I think
it's safe to say that there are multiple instances where the DBA team and
the AppServer team are different people, especially with any group
exploring multi-tenancy. For that use case, client
1) The trunk has more master work. Specifically 89-master related
features that we implemented for our grid architecture.
You have a list of issues Nicolas?
It's at least 3 major features. We're more than willing to work with you
on porting. It sounds like eBay Cloudera have some possible
j...@cloudera.com
To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 10:10 AM
Subject: Re: hbase 0.94.0
Lars,
The upcoming CDH4 Beta HBase will be based on the latest hotness,
0.92.0.
A CDH4 GA HBase will have to have an upgrade path from CDH3
?
-- Lars
From: Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com
To: Matt Corgan mcor...@hotpads.com
Cc: lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com; dev dev@hbase.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: hbase 0.94.0
Lars, Matt,
I like Matt's suggestion
I think we should have 3 consecutive successful builds on Apache Jenkins
for TRUNK before branching.
Cheers
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
(Replying in one mail to a couple of points raised above in this thread)
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 9:37 AM, lars hofhansl
...@cloudera.com
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Cc: lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 7:20 AM
Subject: Re: hbase 0.94.0
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
-1 on our working on stuff to make it easier to skip intermediary
versions. Migrations
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Todd Lipcon t...@cloudera.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
-1 on our working on stuff to make it easier to skip intermediary
versions. Migrations are hard enough going between particular
versions already. Support for
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
In this particular case, there was no explicit migration step needed
going 0.90 to 0.92. Upgrading from 0.90 to 0.94 should just be
running the 0.92 to 0.94 migration script (if there is one).
Thinking more, the above only really
- Original Message -
From: Stack st...@duboce.net
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 9:02 AM
Subject: Re: hbase 0.94.0
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
In this particular case, there was no explicit migration step needed
going 0.90 to 0.92
in 0.94?
-- Lars
- Original Message -
From: Stack st...@duboce.net
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 9:02 AM
Subject: Re: hbase 0.94.0
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
In this particular case, there was no explicit migration
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 9:16 AM, lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com wrote:
Stack, what's your feeling w.r.t. to HBASE-2600, will keeping the 0.90 -
0.92 migration path
make the migration code for HBASE-2600 (much) more complicated in 0.94?
hbase-2600 should go in when its ready. It might make
@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 10:10 AM
Subject: Re: hbase 0.94.0
Lars,
The upcoming CDH4 Beta HBase will be based on the latest hotness, 0.92.0. A
CDH4 GA HBase will have to have an upgrade path from CDH3 HBase. If that HBase
is 0.92 based, we'll test
From: Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com
To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 10:10 AM
Subject: Re: hbase 0.94.0
Lars,
The upcoming CDH4 Beta HBase will be based on the latest hotness, 0.92.0.
A CDH4 GA
From: Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org
To: dev@hbase.apache.org dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl
lhofha...@yahoo.com
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 11:27 AM
Subject: Re: hbase 0.94.0
Dare I mention secondary indexes for 0.96?
You can. :-) But what does that mean
Thanks would be awesome! Let's do that in 0.96. :)
- Original Message -
From: Matt Corgan mcor...@hotpads.com
To: lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com; dev dev@hbase.apache.org
Cc: Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: hbase 0.94.0
can make sure (if needed) that it is all working.
Does that work for you guys?
-- Lars
From: Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com
To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 10:10 AM
Subject: Re: hbase 0.94.0
version of HBASE-5128?
-- Lars
From: Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com
To: Matt Corgan mcor...@hotpads.com
Cc: lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com; dev dev@hbase.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: hbase 0.94.0
Lars, Matt,
I like Matt's
From: Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com
To: Matt Corgan mcor...@hotpads.com
Cc: lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com; dev dev@hbase.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: hbase 0.94.0
Lars, Matt,
I like Matt's suggestion
@hbase.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 8:34 PM
Subject: hbase 0.94.0
Lets branch end of february? No new features thereafter. Is this too
close in? Would be grand if 0.94.0 shipped before hbasecon. What
should 0.94.0 have in it? I don't mind if the list is short.
Unless someone else wants
Can you help me understand the significance cutting the branch a month from
now? As a strawman -- now that 0.92 is out (and ideally just getting fixes
and supportability improvements instead of new features), why don't we cut
a branch even earlier and then just bring in the features we decide get
. I'm happy to be the release manager if you're tired of it. :)
From: Stack st...@duboce.net
To: HBase Dev List dev@hbase.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 8:34 PM
Subject: hbase 0.94.0
Lets branch end of february? No new features
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
