Re: 2.4.20 Change dsp: Win32-specific build files.

2016-03-24 Thread Jacob Champion
On 03/24/2016 06:05 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > I observed the note below in 2010 when that comment was first made (I > cribbed that comment from 2.2.x checkin). So I now wonder if that note > was based on an Express edition perhaps? Or on an early release - and > MS later added or fixed the

Re: 2.4.20 Change dsp: Win32-specific build files.

2016-03-24 Thread William A Rowe Jr
Studio 2010 users cannot convert our .dsp files. > That's not true, I convert them. > > Steffen > > > > From: William A Rowe Jr Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 9:23 PM > To: httpd Subject: ***** Re: 2.4.20 Change dsp: Win32-specific build > files. > > On Wed, Mar 2

Re: 2.4.20 Change dsp: Win32-specific build files.

2016-03-24 Thread Steffen
Good now. Little note: Visual Studio 2010 users cannot convert our .dsp files. That's not true, I convert them. Steffen From: William A Rowe Jr Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 9:23 PM To: httpd Subject: * Re: 2.4.20 Change dsp: Win32-specific build files. On Wed, Mar 23, 2016

Re: 2.4.20 Change dsp: Win32-specific build files.

2016-03-23 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Steffen wrote: > I went earlier back, so I did a .dsp/GUI build with no issues. > > Build with SVN revision 1736328. > > Running looks also fine sofar. > Glad to hear, thanks for testing. I've updated the commit log message to more

Re: 2.4.20 Change dsp: Win32-specific build files.

2016-03-23 Thread Steffen
Running now AL: mod_http2 (v1.4.4, nghttp2 1.8.0), initializing... Was running 1.2.8 (git). Little confusing the version number httpd vs git (1.4.4 vs 1.2.8) Still worried about the memory footprint: Mod_http2 1.0.11 (2.4.18) average ~100 MB peaks with 200 MB. with 1.2.8 average ~200 MB

Re: 2.4.20 Change dsp: Win32-specific build files.

2016-03-23 Thread Stefan Eissing
Thanks, Steffen! > Am 23.03.2016 um 17:12 schrieb Steffen : > > I went earlier back, so I did a .dsp/GUI build with no issues. > > Build with SVN revision 1736328. > > Running looks also fine sofar. > > > > On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:50, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>

Re: 2.4.20 Change dsp: Win32-specific build files.

2016-03-23 Thread Steffen
I went earlier back, so I did a .dsp/GUI build with no issues. Build with SVN revision 1736328. Running looks also fine sofar. On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:50, Jim Jagielski wrote: Thx... I would like to T today if possible, because I was hoping for a release by the end of this week,

Re: 2.4.20 Change dsp: Win32-specific build files.

2016-03-23 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Mar 23, 2016 3:15 AM, "Steffen" wrote: > > Saw that wrowe did a change win make files in 2.4. branche. > > The comment says the the .dsp flies are entirely ! unusable. > > I can tell that they are entirely usable with V9-VC14. What was the issue ? They were directly

Re: 2.4.20 Change dsp: Win32-specific build files.

2016-03-23 Thread Jim Jagielski
Thx... I would like to T today if possible, because I was hoping for a release by the end of this week, but I also don't want to have to punt 2.4.20 as well, so we should wait. > On Mar 23, 2016, at 7:39 AM, Steffen wrote: > > Sure I like to do, but sorry I am out of

Re: 2.4.20 Change dsp: Win32-specific build files.

2016-03-23 Thread Steffen
Sure I like to do, but sorry I am out of town, to morrow morning (my time) I can build. Maybe Jan E and/or Gregg can give it a .dsp try. When I look to the changes, it should build. On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:36, Jim Jagielski wrote: Can you do a quick check that HEAD of 2.4 builds

Re: 2.4.20 Change dsp: Win32-specific build files.

2016-03-23 Thread Jim Jagielski
Can you do a quick check that HEAD of 2.4 builds for you? THX!! > On Mar 23, 2016, at 7:28 AM, Steffen wrote: > > Indeed wrowe did not change any .dsp files. and the changes from wrowe does > not break a .dsp build. > > My attention was just the statement of wrowe that

Re: 2.4.20 Change dsp: Win32-specific build files.

2016-03-23 Thread Yann Ylavic
OK, thanks for clarifying Steffen. On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Steffen wrote: > Indeed wrowe did not change any .dsp files. and the changes from wrowe does > not break a .dsp build. > > My attention was just the statement of wrowe that .dsp files are not usable, >

Re: 2.4.20 Change dsp: Win32-specific build files.

2016-03-23 Thread Steffen
Indeed wrowe did not change any .dsp files. and the changes from wrowe does not break a .dsp build. My attention was just the statement of wrowe that .dsp files are not usable, which is not true. On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:20, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Jan

Re: 2.4.20 Change dsp: Win32-specific build files.

2016-03-23 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: > Steffen in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:15:45 +0100): >>Saw that wrowe did a change win make files in 2.4. branche. >> >>The comment says the the .dsp files are entirely ! unusable. >> >>I can tell that

Re: 2.4.20 Change dsp: Win32-specific build files.

2016-03-23 Thread Jim Jagielski
Agreed! wtf?! > On Mar 23, 2016, at 6:18 AM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: > > Steffen in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:15:45 +0100): >> Saw that wrowe did a change win make files in 2.4. branche. >> >> The comment says the the .dsp files are entirely ! unusable. >>

Re: 2.4.20 Change dsp: Win32-specific build files.

2016-03-23 Thread Jan Ehrhardt
Steffen in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:15:45 +0100): >Saw that wrowe did a change win make files in 2.4. branche. > >The comment says the the .dsp files are entirely ! unusable. > >I can tell that they are entirely usable with V9-VC14. What was the issue ? I agree with

2.4.20 Change dsp: Win32-specific build files.

2016-03-23 Thread Steffen
Saw that wrowe did a change win make files in 2.4. branche. The comment says the the .dsp flies are entirely ! unusable. I can tell that they are entirely usable with V9-VC14. What was the issue ? So please explain why for you it is not usable ? Change comment: The actual .dsp files are