This has always been a thorn in my side :) I actually proposed about 2 yrs
ago that we change from IfModule source.c to IfModule structname
since it's easier to identify the structname. At that time, it appeared to be
challenging, and I had proposed a patch that would capture the structname
in
At 07:25 PM 5/21/2004, Graham Leggett wrote:
I have just tried to build a test tree of the most recent v2.0.50-dev, and it broke
like this:
config.c:1587: `FNM_PERIOD' undeclared (first use in this function)
Attempting to build against APR 1.0?
Bill
[Another patch already in use, to be applied Tuesday unless
someone speaks up.]
We've found cases where XtOffsetOf is already defined on some
platforms - we have no business overriding this (if we wanted our
own flavor, it aught to have been AP_ prefixed :-)
Bill
#
# Some platforms have an
I'd worked with some interesting java and cgi code which implements
proxy behavior, as opposed to using a compiled-in module such as
mod_proxy. In order to properly pass on the Server: and Date: headers
(which are owned by the origin server), this patch tests for the presence
of a Via: header,
At 07:09 AM 5/28/2004, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I've backed out that patch and asked Rasmus to send a replacemnet
which addresses his specific problem but does not cause
the below behavior.
I'm tempted to release 1.3.32...
Collect another week or few of data on other problems first, perhaps?
Once
]
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd worked with some interesting java and cgi code which implements
proxy behavior, as opposed to using a compiled-in module such as
mod_proxy. In order to properly pass on the Server: and Date: headers
(which are owned by the origin server), this patch
Any which way, no matter how well tested subversion is; the fact that
various 3rd parties are willing to mirror our development repositories has
proved invaluable, and tragic when requests for those mirrors weren't
available (in time). Let's get the details worked out long before we all
agree
The proper logic to add to a cache is
wrlock
test if exists again
add element
unlock
because there is a race condition in the logic below
rdlock
test if the element exists
race is here, prior to wrlocking, another thread may wrlock-insert
promote to wrlock
insert
unlock
At 04:41 PM 6/11/2004, Brad Nicholes wrote:
I am sure that we can take advantage of what has been done in mod_ssl and
other places that have to mutex protect shared memory. It is actually working
great on NetWare at the moment but then we don't use shared memory and
we are multi-threaded only.
At 05:43 AM 6/12/2004, Joe Orton wrote:
On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 09:54:56AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- STATUS 11 Jun 2004 21:05:21 - 1.751.2.920
+++ STATUS 12 Jun 2004 09:54:56 - 1.751.2.921
@@ -74,8 +74,10 @@
*) mod_ssl: Remove some unused
At 11:51 AM 6/15/2004, Sascha Schumann wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
does somebody know if its possible to move a file from one dir
to another without loosing the history?
It usually boils down to this:
1. Copy the ,v file in the repository to the new location
At 09:12 AM 6/17/2004, Joshua Slive wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Guernsey, Byron (GE Consumer Industrial) wrote:
Don't expect a quick response. I submitted a feature patch to bugzilla over a month
ago and it hasn't changed state from its new state or had any activity or
ownership changes. I
At 12:17 PM 6/21/2004, Philip Gladstone wrote:
The fix is simple -- replace environ by 0. This signals that the calling process
environment is to be copied and then used by the new process.
If this isn't a constructed environment that solution would work fine.
This problem is definitely
At 07:12 AM 6/21/2004, Jeff Trawick wrote:
There is an explanation with enough detail to be interesting about why Apache 2.0
doesn't get along with layered service providers.
See http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23982
Can some Win32-savant have a look at this and respond?
Whew
At 01:16 PM 6/21/2004, Bill Stoddard wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Scratch my proposal 1a) - your solution 1c) is the obvious choice if the
user attempted to do this within apr...
But it's not practical, in this case because http.dll isn't just another low-level
interface, but a very high
At 12:17 PM 6/21/2004, Philip Gladstone wrote:
Hi,
I discovered that (on Windows) mod_rewrite.c invokes CreateProcess when creating an
external program to handle rewriting requests. It calls CreateProcess and passes
'environ' to be the environment of the called process.
Unfortunately, environ
CVS HEAD or API_0_9_BRANCH, against apr-util APU_0_9_BRANCH, or
that CVS HEAD? Most such problems are a side effect of mixing versions.
Bill
At 12:46 PM 6/21/2004, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Ok, who's the culprit? I have no time to dig into this now...
xlate.c
At 12:00 PM 6/22/2004, Brad Nicholes wrote:
What if the default in APR is to run in a separate address space*, and
in
places in Apache where on NetWare the child process should run in the
same
address space there is a call to the proper procattr manipulator to
override
the default so that the
ASP.NET is a better choice for a web application because it's easier to be
used by a programer.:)
Religious discussions are off-topic on this list...
However ASP.NET uses IIS 6 and IIS 6 uses HTTP API so
nothing will be faster. But Apache HTTPD is a web server not a web
application.
Yes but
At 12:12 PM 6/23/2004, Tom Alsberg wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 11:30:22AM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
the process for adding new features to Apache 2.0 is to first integrate the
feature into Apache 2.1 (cvs HEAD). after that, the feature is voted upon
for inclusion in the stable 2.0
Something seems amiss, we need a unique designation of the status
namespace because this is how win32 binds to a specific DLL, and
determines if the symbol is exported (e.g., from mod_status). If it is
exported from mod_status, we need a seperate 'status' namespace
rather than 'ap'. Flagging
At 12:33 PM 6/24/2004, Graham Leggett wrote:
Sander Striker wrote:
My second attempt at preparing a 2.0.50 rc tarball...
I've tagged the tree (STRIKER_2_0_50_RC2) and uploaded associated
tarballs to:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please test and report.
The tarball refuses to build as an
At 01:18 PM 6/24/2004, Graham Leggett wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Graham, silly question. When it deploys as an RPM, do we also copy
LICENSE and NOTICE to some appropriate spot? This tripped me in
the latest updates - was moving the LICENSE and not NOTICE in the
time since that second
absurd to place LICENSE into /usr/local/. Thoughts?
At 02:16 PM 6/24/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 01:18 PM 6/24/2004, Graham Leggett wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Graham, silly question. When it deploys as an RPM, do we also copy
LICENSE and NOTICE to some appropriate spot? This tripped
At 04:17 AM 6/28/2004, Joe Orton wrote:
OK, the apr_procattr_addrspace_set() interface is sufficient to solve
this problem, right? And there's no issue with back-porting that to the
APR 0.9 branch? The only issue is how to use that interface from
mod_cgi/the Netware MPM without requiring an
At 01:47 PM 6/29/2004, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
: -Original Message-
: From: Colm MacCarthaigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
: Upon doing a apachectl stop, shouldn't the CGI processes
: (forked by
: mod_cgid or mod_cgi) also exit ?
:
: It depends, if they call setsid() and
At 08:30 PM 6/29/2004, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
.. Sure. SIGHUP works great !!. The question is - is it portable to do a
'kill (0, signal)' ? If yes, I can go ahead and submit the patch.
No.
But calling apr_proc_kill() should be consistently supported.
Bill
At 08:58 PM 6/30/2004, Albert Chin wrote:
According to http://httpd.apache.org/:
This version of Apache is principally a bug fix release. Of particular
note is that 2.0.50 addresses one security vulnerability:
A remotely triggered memory leak in http header parsing can allow a
denial of
At 07:45 PM 7/1/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
minfrin 2004/07/01 17:45:43
1.751.2.942 +6 -1 httpd-2.0/STATUS
+*) Add the NOTICE file to the rpm spec file in compliance with the Apache
+ v2.0 license.
+ build/rpm/httpd.spec.in: 1.6
+ +1: minfrin
As you
At 01:14 PM 7/2/2004, you wrote:
I'm floating the idea of releasing 1.3.32 shortly...
Comments or thoughts?
Let me get the mutex protection into mod_rewrite after this holiday
weekend - win32 1.3 mod_rewrite users can finally be happy :)
Bill
At 05:22 AM 7/13/2004, Graham Leggett wrote:
The problem arises when large data sizes (say a 650MB CD ISO) are stored in a
multi-tier webserver architecture (mod_proxy in front of a backend, for example), and
somebody comes along and tries to download it using a download accelerator, or they
At 06:55 AM 7/13/2004, Sadaf Alvi wrote:
i wanna write a cache library and come up with 2 different techniques to allocate
cache memory
1) use calloc free for each node
2) create a subpool in pconf for each node
What your test fails to convey is that alloc and free of one pool is quite
likely
At 08:44 AM 7/13/2004, Graham Leggett wrote:
Geoffrey Young wrote:
ok, that isn't the idea I had about output filters at all. my own concept
of how this all worked (or should work) is that content handlers are
supposed to just generate content. specifically, they should not care at
all about
At 10:57 AM 7/13/2004, Graham Leggett wrote:
Nick Kew wrote:
Bottom line: this has to be controlled by the server admin. We offer
the options of passthrough, process locally, or ignore ranges.
I think it's better to avoid adding extra directives, or giving the admin the power
to override
Brad,
is this the same functionality as 'SSLEngine upgrade' for the _nw_ module?
If so, why not reuse the same semantic?
SSLEngine on negotation crypt - dismiss non-crypt requests
SSLEngine upgradebegin uncrypted - allow upgrade
SSLEngine off begin, and stay,
I agree, here, with Joe. Wondering if it's an appropriate alternative.
I'm facing similar, with a subproject entering incubation, and I'd like to
know our decision here, before I go and create a subproject structure
under /httpd/ that turns out to be wonky.
is /trunk/httpd/ an appropriate
At 09:13 AM 7/16/2004, Graham Leggett wrote:
Brian Akins wrote:
Because the cache_in filter gets added in the quick_handler. The
fast_internal_redirect in mod_dir which translates / to /index.html (or whatever)
seems to lose this filter, so it never gets cached.
Then I'd say the fix should be
I'm pleased to invite all interested members of the httpd community
to participate in the incubation of a new httpd subproject, cli-dev.
An immediate and initial benefit of this subproject is a donation of
code I created at Covalent to host ASP.NET content within httpd 2.0,
strictly for the MS
At 10:20 AM 7/20/2004, Graham Leggett wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
It's now time to refactor and redesign it with Apache 2.x (APR/AP) in
mind to follow Apache 2.x admins habbits and try to make something
simpler.
We came on httpd-dev for advice from experts, and may be an
extended mod_proxy could be
At 12:49 PM 7/20/2004, André Malo wrote:
* Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
And in fine if we could have proxy_ajp included in Apache 2.x
distribution, we'll a great step in Apache2/Tomcat integration,
which should be a goal for ASF members we are.
Having
At 06:54 PM 7/19/2004, Nick Kew wrote:
I have a couple of modules using third-party libraries that require me
to supply an abort function (or they'll abort by exiting).
For example, libjpeg in my mod_jpeg.
My preferred approach to this situation is usually to resort to C++,
put my code in a
At 06:12 AM 7/21/2004, Mladen Turk wrote:
Graham Leggett wrote:
I see no point on making significant effort in a feature that
can only be used for one protocol, that's a huge waste of an
opportunity to solve the load balancing problems of backends
other than tomcat.
Quite contraty, this
The initial thought was you might have LDAP success, OS status success,
and possibly multiple return codes that were considered successes.
Nothing was ever done with this.
Bill
At 02:40 PM 7/28/2004, Garrett Rooney wrote:
Geoffrey Young wrote:
hi all
I was just in garrett's APR talk here at
At 05:55 PM 7/28/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
minfrin 2004/07/28 15:55:15
Modified:.Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH STATUS
Log:
Propose a backport
+*) Add load balancer support to the scoreboard in preparation for
+ load balancing support in mod_proxy.
+
At 02:24 AM 7/29/2004, Mladen Turk wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
/* Scoreboard file, if there is one */
#ifndef DEFAULT_SCOREBOARD
@@ -118,6 +119,7 @@
typedef struct {
int server_limit;
int thread_limit;
+int
At 10:26 AM 7/29/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
If you changed worker_score, it would still have broken (or if you change
balancers in the future.) Agents reviewing the scoreboard are presuming
scoreboard_entry *psb can be accessed as psb[0..n] and that -will- be
broken with any size
At 08:36 PM 7/29/2004, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I'd be surprised if it were even possible for an independent
module to allocate a scoreboard struct, but it has been a while
since I looked at that code.
I think you are right - allocation is in control of httpd itself. Mladen
wants to be able to
At 05:10 AM 8/1/2004, you wrote:
--On Sunday, August 1, 2004 11:26 AM +0200 Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-if ((rv = apr_socket_create(newsock, backend_addr-family,
+#if (APR_VERSION_MAJOR 0)
+if ((rv = apr_socket_create(
+#else
+if ((rv = apr_socket_create_ex(
At 02:35 PM 8/1/2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
John Rowe wrote:
Please define canonicalize
In the context of case-insensitive file systems, it's often the case
that a file is given the canonical name that it was created with
(MyFile) with all other capitalisations (myfile, myfilE) being
alternative
At 10:46 AM 8/2/2004, Bill Stoddard wrote:
EnableSendfile off is a global directive (?) so only need to check it once at startup
and save it in a static variable?
Oh, no!
Directory /fs1/shared/www
EnableSendfile Off
/Directory
kills sendfile for that mount.
Bill
At 09:29 PM 8/3/2004, Bill Stoddard wrote:
mod_cache, mod_mem_cache and mod_disk_cache are experimental modules in 2.0, so I am
going to bypass the votes and just start backporting fixes. Please review as they go
in. If something breaks, we'll fix it. Mmmm K?
+++1 - if folks can't understand
jerenkrantz2004/08/04 12:57:30
--- STATUS4 Aug 2004 19:31:58 - 1.751.2.967
+++ STATUS4 Aug 2004 19:57:29 - 1.751.2.968
@@ -94,15 +94,19 @@
modules/experimental/util_ldap.c: 1.36
+1: minfrin (this requires the apr-util LDAP overhaul to be
Doesn't some de minimis treatment through the incubator still apply? There
are two templates, one for a full project's incubation, one for a lightweight
pass through IP vetting. ++1 here for submission to the incubator as
a new httpd instrumentation subproject. Also happy to help on the ppmc.
At 11:14 AM 8/11/2004, Mladen Turk wrote:
We've finished the initial development of extended mod_proxy.
Since the development took place at jakata-tomcat-connectors,
the source code can be found under ajp/proxy.
That's something of a shame, because we lose the development
history importing the
At 02:15 PM 8/7/2004, Costin wrote:
Now let's see how to get this in Apache2.0...
Gonna try to make that happen, if I can somehow merge history (ick)
It would be great if we would have at least one or 2 people who are committers in
both projects. Since we can't propose Mladen in apache, maybe
At 11:14 AM 8/11/2004, Mladen Turk wrote:
The connection pool enables reusing backend connections
and was build around apr_reslist. At the moment only the
proxy_ajp extensively uses this connection pool, with
performance slightly better then mod_jk.
I noticed one huge win - unless I'm
At 12:48 PM 8/11/2004, Paul Querna wrote:
On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 12:08 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[..snip-snip..]
In general, new modules into 2.0 doesn't seem to make alot of sense
since 2.2 will release before ApacheCon (straightforward goal, don't
you think?.)
I hope so
At 12:54 PM 8/11/2004, you wrote:
Never cross my mind that we'll need all those try-error-fix
commits back on the httpd cvs tree.
We actually like those - the next individual to say wow - this fix is easy!
can go back over history and say grumf - they tried that in the first place
:)
At 01:03 PM 8/11/2004, Graham Leggett wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
That's something of a shame, because we lose the development
history importing the finished effort, and it was further disappointing
that you didn't bring across the earlier cvs history so this branch
could be brought back
Working backwards and allowing a little time for slip:
Nov 1: Planned final RC tarball for release of 2.2.0
Oct 1: Code freeze of all new features in 2.1-dev (for a month till we
branch head to 2.2.0 and bless HEAD as 2.3-dev)
Thoughts?
Bill
At 01:37 PM 8/11/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 01:03 PM 8/11/2004, Graham Leggett wrote:
My plan is to start bringing it into httpd v2.1 from next week, assessing
how hard the backports to httpd v2.0 would potentially be. Is the history
kept in the tomcat connector tree enough
At 11:18 PM 8/11/2004, Costin Manolache wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
It would be great if we would have at least one or 2 people who are committers in
both projects. Since we can't propose Mladen in apache, maybe we can convince
Graham to join tomcat :-)
Can't propose mturk? Why
At 11:19 AM 8/12/2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Thursday, August 12, 2004 12:57 AM -0500 William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Although he's subscribed to all three lists, I'd ask that they go either
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] The history of the discussions is just
At 04:17 AM 8/12/2004, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
Small patch that enables building against zlib-1.2.1
instead of ancient 1.1.4 version.
Ancient? LOL - it's less than a year old due to some bugs it addressed ;-)
However, I agree with moving to 1.2.1 - with a caviat;
now that zlib1.dll is well
At 03:15 PM 8/12/2004, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Geoffrey Young wrote:
so, can someone comment on what 2.2 (and the subsequent 2.3) mean for 2.0?
that is, if everyday hacking is against 2.3 and we propose a new feature to
backport, do we backport to both 2.2 and 2.0? or does it mean that 2.0 has
Please direct these comments to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - b.t.w., you
can check out the latest httpd-2.0 HEAD and pick up the entire proxy
solution (you must explicitly --enable-proxy-ajp and have the ajplib
sources there too.)
Someone want to take a wack at NormW's observations?
At 02:31 AM
At 07:20 AM 8/13/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
trawick 2004/08/13 05:20:53
Modified:modules/proxy proxy_util.c
Log:
axe some unused variables and don't log an error code that
hasn't been initialized
-ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR, rv, s,
+
At 04:58 AM 8/13/2004, NormW wrote:
Good evening Bill, All...
Please direct these comments to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - b.t.w., you
can check out the latest httpd-2.0 HEAD and pick up the entire proxy
solution (you must explicitly --enable-proxy-ajp and have the ajplib
sources there too.)
Someone
At 10:56 AM 8/16/2004, jean-frederic clere wrote:
There are different things:
We could be serving to another proxy in this case my patch is just a work-around and
proxy_balancer.c should handle the CONNECT uri and we could have something like:
Proxy 0.0.0.0:8080
BalancerMember localhost:8080
At 03:58 PM 8/16/2004, Brad Nicholes wrote:
The addition of the proxy_ajp module to the httpd project presents a
build problem. The AJP module code exists in httpd/modules/proxy in the
httpd project but the AJP lib code still sits in the
jakarta-tomcat-connectors\ajp\ajplib\test in the jakarta
At 01:56 AM 8/17/2004, jean-frederic clere wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 03:58 PM 8/16/2004, Brad Nicholes wrote:
The addition of the proxy_ajp module to the httpd project presents a
build problem. The AJP module code exists in httpd/modules/proxy in the
httpd project but the AJP lib
At 04:36 PM 8/17/2004, Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 11:48:39AM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
hi all
the attached patch is required for me to get mod_proxy to compile with -Werror.
Thanks Geoff. The only thing I'm not sure of is whether this function
should really be deleted or if
At 06:28 AM 8/22/2004, Nick Kew wrote:
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004, Shaun Evans wrote:
Please find attached a number of files (in tar.gz) that I have made to
help improve the Apache HTTP Server website.
Please don't do that. A URL for a tar.gz file is much friendlier on
peoples inboxes.
Actually,
At 10:37 AM 8/23/2004, Brian Akins wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
if not appropriate to run the normal file cleanups at child exit, then
mod_log_config could have a child exit hook to flush buffered log
files
Does child_exit exist in 2.0?
plog is the appropriate pool cleanup to accomplish what you
The plog pool, second in the argument list to the open_logs call,
is used for log files. It sounded like you were trying to deal
with log file flushing, which is why I suggested this pool's cleanup.
Bill
At 07:59 PM 8/23/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stoddard2004/08/23 17:59:47
Modified:.Apache.dsw
Log:
ldap is out of experimental
Before we release again, since it was experimental and is now
a real module, and on Unix it is mod_ldap.so consisting of
util_ldap.c
At 07:23 PM 8/23/2004, Graham Leggett wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
Is your DefaultType set to text/html?
It's set like so:
DefaultType text/plain
You are proxying content? What does the HEAD /image.gif HTTP/1.0
report for content type from the backend server?
Bill
At 11:53 AM 8/31/2004, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Personally, I think that if Roy said that it would
cause non-compliance then, unless he changed his mind,
that's good enough for me to veto any change that
would add Set-Cookie.
I strongly agree. Roy?
As
At 07:55 AM 9/2/2004, Henri Gomez wrote:
Should we see the works on mod_proxy and ajp support in the upcoming 2.0.51 ?
No, not in 2.0.51 (and to your following question of 2.0.x later
releases, also likely no.)
Yes, in 2.1.0.
It was commented that mod_proxy is becoming quite stable - bug
fixes
At 09:25 AM 9/2/2004, Henri Gomez wrote:
Bad news for me and many others since without AJP support included in
2.0.x, users will still require to have mod_jk to link there HTTPD to
Tomcats.
Could we hope the dev team to relax the situation for mod_proxy/ajp in
future 2.0.x release, since Graham,
At 12:59 PM 9/2/2004, Mladen Turk wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Could we hope the dev team to relax the situation for mod_proxy/ajp in
future 2.0.x release
[...] please don't expect them
to sympathize when n.x.z - n.x.(z+1) starts breaking things, this
undermines the confidence in one
At 03:29 PM 9/2/2004, Geoffrey Young wrote:
ok, I see what is going on. I forgot I had an old installation in
/usr/local/apache2, and that looks to be what was found - removing
apr-config and apu-config from that installation and everything is fine.
still, I thought that APR 1.0 used
At 11:05 AM 9/8/2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Tuesday, September 7, 2004 4:27 PM +1000 Jason Rigby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found that you can get mod_ssl included as a binary if you download
the binaries that include PHP and mod_perl. (That's how I got it
working for me) I think mod_ssl
At 12:01 PM 9/8/2004, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, [ISO-8859-15] André Malo wrote:
Actually I'm talking about the two proposals on the top. If you are
interested in backport voting, you need to touch the STATUS file anyway and
should follow the commits there.
[...] And no, I
At 11:12 AM 9/9/2004, Rici Lake wrote:
EACCES is just the wrong error, because it has different semantics.
I tend to agree, but it's not totally clear. Reiser4's files can also function as
directories, so ENOTDIR is incorrect. ENOENT seems like a reasonable choice, but
POSIX also mandates the
You introduce a race between multiple listening threads attempting
to initialize the scoreboard together. post_config or child_init
should solve the problem, no?
At 03:16 AM 9/10/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mturk 2004/09/10 01:16:26
Modified:modules/proxy proxy_balancer.c
At 05:24 AM 9/10/2004, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 09:34:14 +0200, jean-frederic clere
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
See attached patch. Given a module with map-to-storage hook which
leaves r-filename NULL, and config like the following, you get
segfault on
At 05:05 PM 9/12/2004, you wrote:
-AP_DECLARE(long) ap_get_client_block(request_rec *r, char *buffer, apr_size_t
bufsiz);
+AP_DECLARE(apr_ssize_t) ap_get_client_block(request_rec *r, char *buffer, apr_size_t
bufsiz);
Don't know why long was used here, but it causes a warning
for Windows IA64
At 10:21 AM 9/14/2004, Joshua Slive wrote:
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, [ISO-8859-15] André Malo wrote:
A 30 KB default config, which nobody outside this circle here
really understands, isn't helpful - especially for beginners.
I agree that the current config file is too big and ugly. But let's be a
At 01:30 PM 9/14/2004, Joshua Slive wrote:
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'm trying to understand what other anomalies you mean between
Unix and Win32, they aren't that dis-similar.
I was mainly refering to the big block of mpm-control directives near the top.
But I like
At 10:49 AM 9/15/2004, you wrote:
Is there an ETA on the Win32 source bundle?
About one hour.
Bill
At 08:54 AM 9/17/2004, Jess Holle wrote:
... given the security and non-LDAP fixes in 2.0.51, I am now left pondering whether
I should move try backing the LDAP modules back to 2.0.50 while keeping all other
2.0.51 code. Ideas?
All in all, LDAP does not appear to be a happy camper on 2.0.51 on
At 01:33 PM 9/20/2004, Jess Holle wrote:
Brad Nicholes wrote:
I'm still wondering if we shouldn't just stick with the local
read/write
lock on Windows and other single child MPMs (NetWare?) as this should
allow better throughput in such cases and yet be safe, right? In
fact,
Actually on
At 02:12 AM 9/22/2004, Marco Glatz wrote:
hello,
i wanted to build httpd 2.0.51 with mod_ssl and mod_deflate, using vc++ 6.0
SP6 on win2k SP4, but i get this error-message:
deflate.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _compressBound
zlib 1.1.4 sources were tested, but in 1.2.x they
At 06:23 AM 9/22/2004, Marco wrote:
zlib 1.2.1 is current, it's hard to tell from your typo which
you used(?)
Try zlib 1.1.4 sources unpacked into the httpd source tree
srclib/zlib/
location.
i have used 1.1.4 and i wrote this in my first mail ;)
You wrote 1.4.1 shrug. Anyways, we have
The binaries for 2.0.51 have been removed from the www.apache.org/dist/
site, you can still find them in archive.apache.org/dist/.
However, due to CAN-2004-0811, I would strongly discourage you from
using these binaries.
I believe it's a disservice to repackage with the patch, since it's
Can we quickly identify what else was broken to roll out 2.0.52
in the next day or two? I presume this too was 2.0.51 specific?
Bill
jorton 2004/09/22 01:57:30
Modified:.Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH STATUS
Log:
Find a third 2.0.51 regression THIS WEEK and win a FREE
At 08:55 AM 9/22/2004, you wrote:
Perhaps the fix to bug #24801 I recently provided could be included as well...
This patch?
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=12817
I'm not as familiar with this cache code, Graham could you look at this?
In any case, it's committed
At 08:29 AM 9/22/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'm prepared to reroll the Win32 installers this week for 2.0.52 - the
only question is, what other regressions did 2.0.51 introduce? May as
well fix all the newly introduced bugs and roll out 2.0.52 in the next
day or two.
Based
After battling locks with minfrin, the tree is now tagged. Please
check out and test.
Happy to tar it, but I wanted to verify, what is the authoritative
flavor of libtool we are using for the tarball's ./configure?
Bill
101 - 200 of 6128 matches
Mail list logo
