Re: Idea - how to override bundle headers without wrap:

Stephan - many many thanks! Fragment trick works like a charm. Looks like I was not thinking enough in OSGi concepts (or maybe I was trying to be too clever? :) regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 19 mar 2019 o 12:34 Grzegorz Grzybek napisał(a): > Thanks Stephan for valuable comment. > >

Re: Idea - how to override bundle headers without wrap:

://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-6200 as "proposal" with minor priority. Using fragment bundle sounds like great alternative - was it the same case with org.apache.aries.blueprint.core.compatibility-1.0.0.jar ? regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 19 mar 2019 o 11:30 Siano, Stephan napisał(a):

Re: Idea - how to override bundle headers without wrap:

Thanks I still have documentation issue related to features processor unresolved: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-5540 But I agree. I really have to describe it. regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 19 mar 2019 o 10:24 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a): > Hi Grzegorz > > I think

Idea - how to override bundle headers without wrap:

ting features processor mechanism, this change is actually not that big. I see nice potential in it, but I'd very like to get your opinion on it - maybe additional ideas? Or problems with current idea? best regards Grzegorz Grzybek

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf Decanter 2.2.0 release

+1 regards Grzegorz Grzybek pon., 18 mar 2019 o 09:49 Achim Nierbeck napisał(a): > +1 (binding) > > regards, Achim > > Am Mo., 18. März 2019 um 08:24 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > > +1 (non binding) > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (runtime) 4.2.4 release

+1 (binding) regards Grzegorz Grzybek pt., 15 mar 2019 o 07:18 Roedl Lukas napisał(a): > +1 (non-binding) > > regards, > Lukas > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Jean-Baptiste Onofré > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. März 2019 13:43 > An: Karaf Dev > Betreff

Re: Problem deploying 4.2.3 custom distribution

Hello Please release configadmin 1.9.14 and include in Karaf 4.2.4 (configadmin PersistenceManager leak fix). regards Grzegorz Grzybek śr., 6 mar 2019 o 11:02 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a): > Hi Eric, > > You can count on me, 4.2.4 will be on vote soon ! > > Regards > JB

Re: FeaturesProcessorImpl improvement of bundle override

Hello Looks like I was anticipating such problem by adding "TOCHECK: last rule wins - no break!!!" :) The diff looks good - if all existing tests pass, I think we can merge it. Could you please create KARAF jira issue for this? best regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 5 mar 2019 o 18:27 Jea

Re: Karaf board report March 2019

Hello I wasn't aware I should comment - silent consensus ;) Looks good - thanks! regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 5 mar 2019 o 07:09 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a): > Hi guys, > > I would like to submit the report asap, no comment ? > > Thanks, > Regards > JB > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Introduce "static" resolver

classloader is a bit against OSGi ;) regards Grzegorz Grzybek > > Regards, > Serge... > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 4:28 PM Christian Schneider < > ch...@die-schneider.net> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Am Mo., 4. März 2019 um 15:29 Uhr schrieb Gui

Re: [PROPOSAL] Introduce "static" resolver

definition. I'll check the winegrower project too! Great times ahead of Karaf! regards Grzegorz Grzybek pon., 4 mar 2019 o 15:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a): > Hi guys, > > During the introduction thread about "kloud initiative", we quickly > discussed about the r

Re: Problem deploying 4.2.3 custom distribution

Also, if felix.configadmin with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6066 fixed could be used, it'd be perfect! :) regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 26 lut 2019 o 09:53 Eric Lilja napisał(a): > If the new bugfix releases of felix.configadmin and felix.scr could be > included a

Re: Problem deploying 4.2.3 custom distribution

+1 ;) regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 26 lut 2019 o 06:59 Francois Papon napisał(a): > Sounds good for me ;) > > regards, > > François Papon > fpa...@apache.org > > Le 26/02/2019 à 09:44, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > > As other plugins (especially deploy) d

Re: Problem deploying 4.2.3 custom distribution

eploy plugin is released (or nexus-staging-deploy-plugin), we should upgrade immediately. regards Grzegorz Grzybek > > Anyway I will isolate the wagon use. > > Regards > JB > > Le 25 févr. 2019 à 22:18, à 22:18, Grzegorz Grzybek > a écrit: > >Hello > > > >I a

Re: Problem deploying 4.2.3 custom distribution

3.2.0 (which works btw). I'm not saying that we should revert https://github.com/apache/karaf/commit/5097abd6d4c - just saying that I've found the root cause of the problem ;) regards Grzegorz Grzybek niedz., 24 lut 2019 o 12:14 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a): > Not really, it's upda

Re: Blacklist of bundle from feature

e in 4.1.x - blacklistedBundles is not for feature generation. It's for assembly goal and I think the blacklisted bundle will be declared in etc/overrides.properties. regards Grzegorz Grzybek === [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-5376?focusedCommentI

Re: Problem with the newest blueprint in karaf 4.2.x

Do you have some extracted example (simple blueprint file) that can show this problem? I'd be happy to track down this race condition... regards Grzegorz Grzybek śr., 13 lut 2019 o 15:29 Dominik Przybysz napisał(a): > We had this problem when we had only cm-properties, so we started to

Re: Problem with the newest blueprint in karaf 4.2.x

Hello Do you really need both? I vaguely remember that the race was with property-placeholder, but not with cm-properties (or vice versa - sorry, can't check now). regards Grzegorz Grzybek śr., 13 lut 2019 o 14:57 Dominik Przybysz napisał(a): > The problem is that we always have reload

Re: Problem with the newest blueprint in karaf 4.2.x

Hello JBO - that's similar race we've observed (talked about this on IRC). I remember we've found something (not synchronized, iterative copy of properties between maps), but I can't remember the conclusion... regards Grzegorz Grzybek śr., 13 lut 2019 o 14:11 Dominik Przybysz napisał(a): >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (runtime) 4.2.3 release (take 2)

/~ggrzybek/apache-karaf-4.2.3-bundle-report.xml regards Grzegorz Grzybek pt., 8 lut 2019 o 05:31 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a): > Hi all, > > I submit Apache Karaf (runtime) 4.2.3 to your vote. This is a > maintenance release on the 4.2.x series, bringing some improvements and > bug fi

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (runtime) 4.2.3 release

ver.class = org.apache.derby.jdbc.AutoloadedDriver osgi.jdbc.driver.name = derby osgi.jdbc.driver.version = 10.14.200.1828579 service.bundleid = 45 service.id = 88 service.scope = singleton regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 5 lut 2019 o 15:34 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a): > Hi Christian, > > you have to instal

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (runtime) 4.2.3 release

Hmm, https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXJDBC-135 removed a need for dedicated pax-jdbc-derby. But I can't see (`bundle:services -p derby`) if mvn:org.apache.derby/derby/10.14.2.0 provides any service - it doesn't. regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 5 lut 2019 o 15:28 Christian Schneider napisał

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (runtime) 4.2.3 release

Good idea. We should align up, not down. +1 then regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 5 lut 2019 o 15:25 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a): > Hi, > > this javax.annotation-api 1.3 upgrade is related to CXF request. > > Camel and CXF uses 1.3. > > So, anyway, we will have the issue

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (runtime) 4.2.3 release

to javax.annotation-api 1.3. The update itself is harmless, but because pax-web, pax-cdi and hibernate features use this bundle at version 1.2, I suspect there may be problems related to "double OSGi resolution chain". I'd personally revert upgrade of such important API. regards Grzegorz G

Re: [HEADS UP] Releases schedule

Great idea about 4.3.0.RC1! Maybe at the time of 4.3.0.RC2 I can prepare pax-web 8.0.0 with R7 support. Looking forward to 4.2.3. regards Grzegorz Grzybek śr., 30 sty 2019 o 08:29 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a): > Hi guys, > > FYI, I just have couple of Jira for Karaf 4.2.3. >

Re: [HEADS UP] Releases schedule

-validator that's very easy to "align" externally (in any custom distro) using this etc/org.apache.karaf.features.xml: http://karaf.apache.org/xmlns/features-processing/v1.0.0; xmlns:f="http://karaf.apache.org/xmlns/features/v1.5.0;>

Re: [HEADS UP] Releases schedule

ocally I work on master-servlet-4) and this looks promising - the only thing left is to wait for Jetty 10... I guess my work related to servlets-4.0 should be ready for Karaf 4.3.0. regards Grzegorz Grzybek niedz., 20 sty 2019 o 06:45 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a): > I created Jira to pr

Re: [HEADS UP] Releases schedule

with KARAF-6074 "Race condition between the FeaturesService and FeatureDeploymentListener" and my work is done here. @Benjamin Graf - I remember about your suggestion for consistency report, but I wasn't able to check it this week - it was very busy week for me. best regards Grzegorz G

Re: SCR Bundle refreshes Pax Logging?

Hello having commons-csv in etc/startup.properties is the best (for now) way to resolve this unnecessary refresh problem (I did it many times with JBoss Fuse). For pax-logging fix, I've created https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXLOGGING-248 to track it. regards Grzegorz Grzybek pt., 18 sty 2019

Re: SCR Bundle refreshes Pax Logging?

/ locator. regards Grzegorz Grzybek czw., 17 sty 2019 o 19:37 Fabian Lange napisał(a): > I will have the same problem with jackson as well ;) > > pax-logging-log4j2 has really broad optional imports. probably for the > other formatters that can be plugged. > > thats really

Re: SCR Bundle refreshes Pax Logging?

You don't have to find the source of WTF :) pax-logging-log4j2 has: Import-Package: org.apache.commons.csv;resolution:=optional regards Grzegorz Grzybek czw., 17 sty 2019 o 17:07 Fabian Lange napisał(a): > Hi, > see its not a karaf problem. > Grzegorz gave me really good hints

Re: SCR Bundle refreshes Pax Logging?

mvn\:org.ops4j.pax.logging/pax-logging-api/1.10.1 = 8 mvn\:org.ops4j.pax.logging/pax-logging-log4j2/1.10.1 = 8 So I've already ensured that jansi starts/resolves before pax-logging-log4j2. I hope this helps. regards Grzegorz Grzybek czw., 17 sty 2019 o 15:15 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf Cave 4.1.2 release

+1 regards Grzegorz Grzybek śr., 16 sty 2019 o 06:40 Francois Papon napisał(a): > +1 (binding) > > Thanks JB! > > Regards, > > François Papon > fpa...@apache.org > > Le 15/01/2019 à 23:26, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > I sub

Re: [HEADS UP] Releases schedule

dec 1.11 is included (single version of this library across all the above projects) about pax-cdi - that's interesting - I could successfully clear some problems, use latest weld and openwebbeans (CDI 1.2) and use xbean 4.12 Tomorrow I'm going to release all 5 above pax-* projects. best regards G

Re: [HEADS UP] Releases schedule

release too (version alignment only). JB - please leave xbean and commons-codec to me - I'll have them aligned ok? regards Grzegorz Grzybek === [1]: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Version-alignment-report-for-Karaf-4-2-3-SNAPSHOT-1-2-td4054786.html pon., 14 sty 2019 o 13:34 Jean-Baptiste Onofré

Re: [HEADS UP] Releases schedule

mvn:org.apache.xbean/xbean-finder/4.6 pax-web-core/7.2.5 mvn:org.apache.xbean/xbean-naming/4.12 jndi/4.2.3.SNAPSHOT mvn:org.apache.xbean/xbean-reflect/4.6 pax-web-core/7.2.5 So looks like it’s more pax-cdi problem… but I’ll check what can I do. regards Grzegorz Grzybek pon., 14 sty 2019 o 12:54

Re: [HEADS UP] Releases schedule

Stephen - good idea - let me check regards Grzegorz Grzybek pon., 14 sty 2019 o 12:54 Siano, Stephan napisał(a): > Hi Grzegorz, > > When you are about to align dependency versions between pax-web and karaf, > is it also possible to have a common xbean-version? Karaf references 4.1

Re: [HEADS UP] Releases schedule

Hello Thanks for heads up. Because I updated pax-url to 2.6.1, I want to release pax-web 7.2.x with similar update (because current pax-web in Karaf uses pax-url 2.5.2). But that's not critical. regards Grzegorz Grzybek pon., 14 sty 2019 o 06:48 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a): > Hi, >

Re: Version alignment report for Karaf 4.2.3-SNAPSHOT - 1/2

raries or e.g., commons-beanutils 1.9.2 and 1.9.3 included in the distro. Of course feel free to improve the report as you like ;) https://github.com/apache/karaf/blob/master/profile/src/main/java/org/apache/karaf/profile/assembly/Builder.java#L1119-L1224 best regards Grzegorz Grzybek > >

Re: Version alignment report for Karaf 4.2.3-SNAPSHOT - 2/2

ve correct and are viewable by XSLT aware browser (Firefox). JB, please add "consistency" profile to jenkins - we'll check what comes out of it. regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 8 sty 2019 o 14:10 Grzegorz Grzybek napisał(a): > Hello again > > First (tl;d

Re: Version alignment report for Karaf 4.2.3-SNAPSHOT - 1/2

Github: oscerd > > > > > > > On Tuesday, January 8, 2019, 1:34:35 PM GMT+1, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > > > > > > Nice Greg. > > What do you think about enabling this report via Jenkins (using a profile) > ? > >

Version alignment report for Karaf 4.2.3-SNAPSHOT - 2/2

o pax-url 2.6.1, pax-web still "brings in" pax-url-war 2.5.2 - pax-jdbc: Karaf uses 1.3.1, while pax-cdi uses 0.5.0 - I'll take care of this. - Narayana: pax-jdbc uses 5.2.8, pax-jms uses 5.6.3 - I'll take care of this. - JBoss-Logging: used at different versions (3.3.0 and 3.3.2) regards Grzegorz Grzybek

Version alignment report for Karaf 4.2.3-SNAPSHOT - 1/2

ls:comment-tabpanel#comment-16431939 In next email, I'll show what should/could be aligned in master branch for Karaf 4.2.3-SNAPSHOT. regards Grzegorz Grzybek

Re: Happy new year

Happy New MMXIX! Don't let the clouds cover everything else and let's keep Karaf great and interesting piece of software. best regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 1 sty 2019 o 18:16 Francois Papon napisał(a): > Hi JB! > > Happy new year to you and to all the Karaf team and users! > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (runtime) 4.2.2 release

Hello I wouldn't treat permission denied (caused by empty KARAF_LOG / karaf.log) +1 (binding) regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 18 gru 2018 o 06:47 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a): > Did you update to pax exam 4.13.1 ? > > Regards > JB > > Le 18 déc. 2018 à 01:00, à 0

Re: Help to get out of pax-web from karaf distribution

regards Grzegorz Grzybek === [1]: https://github.com/apache/karaf/blob/master/assemblies/apache-karaf-minimal/pom.xml#L121-L130 śr., 5 gru 2018 o 13:02 Sai Sankar napisał(a): > Hello Grzegorz Grzybek > > Thanks for your response. > > For minimal distribution

Re: Help to get out of pax-web from karaf distribution

to change terminology, simply we should avoid including other repos from "native" / "built in" repos. Maybe it's worth considering in Karaf 4.3.0 (Karaf 5.0.0?). regards Grzegorz Grzybek śr., 5 gru 2018 o 12:21 Christian Schneider napisał(a): > I think this points to

Re: Bad commit https://github.com/apache/karaf/commit/62e832c7009b5b8beafd219ff7b6b66051205682

Camel works with both Aries bp.core <1.10.0 and >=1.10.1: ARIES-1858 tl;dr: don't use bp.core 1.10.0, upgrade Karaf 4.2.2 to bp.core 1.10.1. best regards Grzegorz Grzybek pon., 3 gru 2018 o 16:05 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a): > Actually, thanks to https://issues.apache.org/jira/bro

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (runtime) 4.1.7 release

+1 regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 27 lis 2018 o 04:36 Freeman Fang napisał(a): > +1 > > Thanks JB! > － > Freeman(Yue) Fang > > Red Hat, Inc. > > > > > > > On Nov 27, 2018, at 2:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Karaf 4.3.x and resource repositories

not be directly translatable to OSGi R7 repositories. But it's a great subject to investigate and I'll be more than happy to review your PoC! best regards Grzegorz Grzybek pt., 23 lis 2018 o 05:16 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a): > Hi guys, > > as discussed since some weeks, Karaf 4.2.2 should b

Re: Apache Karaf 4.1.7 and 4.2.2 release schedule

Hello Great! If you want something from ops4j side, please let me know. My work on pax-web with Undertow 2 and Tomcat 9 (and servlet-api 4) is scheduled for pax-web 8 (and, probably, karaf 4.3.x) best regards Grzegorz Grzybek śr., 14 lis 2018 o 09:28 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a): > Hi g

Re: [PROPOSAL] Add spotless to Karaf and subprojects

;${basedir}/license-header > > > Should we add this ? > Nice! Is it as powerful as e.g., com.mycila:license-maven-plugin? This one can be configured for different kinds of files, with exceptions and special mappings. regards Grzegorz Grzybek > regards, > > François

Re: [PROPOSAL] Add spotless to Karaf and subprojects

Thank you! :) regards Grzegorz Grzybek czw., 8 lis 2018 o 08:45 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a): > Hi guys, > > I updated the PR to use a 4 spaces indent style. > > Regards > JB > > On 07/11/2018 05:43, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi team, > > > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Add spotless to Karaf and subprojects

? regards Grzegorz Grzybek

Re: [PROPOSAL] Create karaf-4.2.x branch and move master to 4.3.x supporting R7

Hello +1! regards Grzegorz Grzybek pon., 24 wrz 2018 o 11:41 Francois Papon napisał(a): > Hi JB, > > It sounds good for me :) > > Thanks ! > > Regards, > > François Papon > fpa...@apache.org > > Le 24/09/2018 à 12:01, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Simplify the karaf-maven-plugin to easily create custom distribution

ax.cdi/pax-cdi-jetty-weld This etc/profile.cfg can be treated simply as it was added in karaf-maven-plugin:assembly configuration itself! path/to/profile.cfg best regards Grzegorz Grzybek czw., 13 wrz 2018 o 13:51 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a): > Hi guys, > > Recently

Re: [PROPOSAL] Simplify components and cleanup old versions in Jira

ut I agree that users seldom set the component field correctly. Labels could be used by devs after the issue was created. Also - if Cave, Cellar, Decanter had separate jira projects, components wouldn't be needed at all, but I think treating "component" as "subproject" is fine.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Simplify components and cleanup old versions in Jira

-tooling has 49 issues - not that much comparing to karaf-features or karaf-core. So I don't think "build" component is that crucial after all. regards Grzegorz Grzybek --- [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/KARAF/summary/statistics > regards, > > François Papon >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Simplify components and cleanup old versions in Jira

Hello That'd be great to have fewer components. However, maybe it would be good to have a component like "maven" or "build" too? regards Grzegorz Grzybek pon., 10 wrz 2018 o 04:54 Francois Papon napisał(a): > Hi JB, > > +1 ! > > Full agree with that :) &g

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf Cave 4.1.1 release

+1 (non-binding) regards Grzegorz Grzybek czw., 6 wrz 2018 o 07:50 Jean-Baptiste Onofré napisał(a): > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > On 05/09/2018 06:56, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I submit Apache Karaf Cave 4.1.1 release to your vote. &

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf "Container" 4.2.1 release

+1 (non-binding) regards Grzegorz Grzybek pon., 20 sie 2018 o 06:06 Freeman Fang napisał(a): > +1 (binding) > > Thanks! > － > Freeman(Yue) Fang > > Red Hat, Inc. > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > > > > > On Aug 18, 2018, at 9:34 PM, Je

Re: 4.2.1 vote tonight/tomorrow morning | Karaf regular release pace

Hello Good idea for smaller but faster releases. regards Grzegorz Grzybek czw., 16 sie 2018 o 06:38 Francois Papon napisał(a): > Hi, > > +1 for both :) > > Releasing every 2 month make the release smallest and I think it's good > for our users, it make the upgrade of their

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (Container) 4.1.6 release - take #2

+1 (non-binding) regards Grzegorz Grzybek pt., 10 sie 2018 o 10:41 Francois Papon napisał(a): > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks ! > > regards, > > François Papon > fpa...@apache.org > > Le 10/08/2018 à 08:58, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > > Hi all, >

Re: Preparing Karaf 4.2.1 and some ideas

make things easier with custom distributions. best regards Grzegorz Grzybek 2018-06-17 17:17 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > Hi guys, > > As I started to prepare Karaf 4.2.1, I rebased and cleaned up the > examples. The corresponding PR is there: > > https://github.com/apache/kara

Re: [ANN] Apache Karaf 4.2.0 has been released!

Congratulations! Very good news! regards Grzegorz Grzybek 2018-04-10 11:52 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>: > The Apache Karaf team is pleased to announce Apache Karaf 4.2.0 release! > > This is the first GA release on the new 4.2.x stable series, bringing a

Re: FYI, OSGi Features RFP

ut forcing Karaf to implement post-factum standard... regards Grzegorz Grzybek 2018-04-09 12:31 GMT+02:00 Christian Schneider <ch...@die-schneider.net>: > I think the RFP is based on the prototype of the sling feature model. > > See: > https://github.com/apache/sling-whitebo

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (Container) 4.2.0 release (take 2)

Hello, I just built the *new* 4.2.0 tag and I'm performing my tests. regards Grzegorz Grzybek 2018-04-05 8:03 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>: > Hi all, > > I submit Karaf (Container) 4.2.0 release to your vote. > > This is the first GA on the 4.2.x

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (Container) 4.2.0 release

My tests show that everything's fine with pax-web 7. Thanks! +1 (non-binding). regards Grzegorz Grzybek 2018-04-03 10:25 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>: > Hi all, > > I submit Karaf (Container) 4.2.0 release to your vote. > > This is the first G

Re: compilation failing with karaf 4.2.0.M2

Good idea - and enjoy console colors! cheers Grzegorz Grzybek 2018-03-08 14:49 GMT+01:00 shivibansal <shivanibansal1...@gmail.com>: > Ok Thx, I will update it to 3.5.3. > > Regards > Shivani > > > > -- > Sent from: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Karaf-Dev-f930721.html >

Re: compilation failing with karaf 4.2.0.M2

The change was done in Maven 3.3.x times ~Grzegorz 2018-03-08 14:33 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > Hi, > > are you using Maven 3.5.x ? > > Regards > JB > > On 03/08/2018 02:31 PM, shivibansal wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > we were trying to upgrade KARAF version of our

Re: compilation failing with karaf 4.2.0.M2

Which Maven version do you use? regards Grzegorz Grzybek 2018-03-08 14:31 GMT+01:00 shivibansal <shivanibansal1...@gmail.com>: > Hi All, > > we were trying to upgrade KARAF version of our project to 4.2.0M2. rest of > the modules compiled fine but with build folder which

Re: Call for review

Hello! I already run all itests for pax-web 7.0.x before Jetty upgraade, so the branch should be fine if you fixed Jetty upgrade issues. best regards Grzegorz Grzybek 2018-03-04 7:58 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>: > FYI, I just fixed the itests failure (i

Re: [HEADS UP] Preparing Apache Karaf 4.2.0 GA

t (finally!) 1.0.0) and then use 1.0.0 in pax-web 7.0.0 best regards Grzegorz Grzybek 2018-02-19 11:17 GMT+01:00 Oliver Lietz <apa...@oliverlietz.de>: > On Monday 19 February 2018 05:58:31 Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi guys, > > Hi, > > > After 4.2.0.M1 &

Re: [HEADS UP] Preparing Apache Karaf 4.2.0 GA

can help on this & release. > Currently PAX-CDI doesn't have any link to pax-web. And to be honest, I'd like to avoid having version ranges in / - I had one in CXF → PAX-CDI and ended with two pax-cdi feature repositories in my custom Karaf distro... regards Grzegorz Grzybek > > Regards

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (Container) 4.1.5 release

+1 (non-binding) regards Grzegorz Grzybek 2018-02-13 9:17 GMT+01:00 Andrea Cosentino <ancosen1...@yahoo.com.invalid>: > +1 (non-binding) > --Andrea Cosentino --Apache Camel PMC > MemberApache Karaf CommitterApache Servicemix PMC MemberEmail

Re: [HEADS UP] Preparing Apache Karaf "Container" 4.1.5

Hello Nothing from me. regards Grzegorz Grzybek 2018-02-05 7:33 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>: > Hi guys, > > FYI, now that Decanter 2.0.0 is on vote, I would like to prepare Karaf > 4.1.5 for > this week. > > I already have some fixes on

Re: [RELEASE] Preparing Karaf Decanter 2.0.0, Karaf Cellar 4.1.2/4.0.4, and Karaf "Container" 4.2.0

gt; actually work on any open source project right now. > > The only thing I'm able to to is to watch the mailinglists and sometimes > > give a hint or two :/ > > > > So feel free to call the version anything that feels better to you, I > just > > don't have the "

Re: [RELEASE] Preparing Karaf Decanter 2.0.0, Karaf Cellar 4.1.2/4.0.4, and Karaf "Container" 4.2.0

idea... regards Grzegorz Grzybek 2018-02-01 8:16 GMT+01:00 Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzy...@gmail.com>: > Good idea. pax-web 7 won't differ much from 6.1, but it's ok. > > regards > Grzegorz Grzybek > > 2018-02-01 8:04 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>:

Re: [RELEASE] Preparing Karaf Decanter 2.0.0, Karaf Cellar 4.1.2/4.0.4, and Karaf "Container" 4.2.0

Good idea. pax-web 7 won't differ much from 6.1, but it's ok. regards Grzegorz Grzybek 2018-02-01 8:04 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>: > My concern is more about the Jetty 9.4 update. > > In that case, I would propose: > > 1. Bump master to Pax Web 8.0.x

Re: [RELEASE] Preparing Karaf Decanter 2.0.0, Karaf Cellar 4.1.2/4.0.4, and Karaf "Container" 4.2.0

x support? > > -- > Andrea Cosentino > -- > Apache Camel PMC Member > Apache Karaf Committer > Apache Servicemix PMC Member > Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com > Twitter: @oscerd2 > Github: oscerd > > > > > > > On Thursday, Febr

Re: [RELEASE] Preparing Karaf Decanter 2.0.0, Karaf Cellar 4.1.2/4.0.4, and Karaf "Container" 4.2.0

s/d/1TB_q5r9i8DOIHmBQa1_RjsrcjWCwCwsLPj3Pc6FoTJ8/edit#gid=1455909167> - see both sheets) Jetty 9.4.x is still Servlets 3.1/JavaEE 7. best regards Grzegorz Grzybek 2018-01-31 20:59 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>: > Hi, > > a quick update on the release schedule. > > As you probably saw, I cance

Re: Happy new year

Happy new year 2*10^3+18! ~Grzegorz Grzybek 2018-01-02 2:53 GMT+01:00 Freeman Fang <freeman.f...@gmail.com>: > Thanks JB! > > Happy new year all! > － > Freeman(Yue) Fang > > Red Hat, Inc. > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > > > > > On

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (Container) 4.1.4 release

+1 (non-binding) regards Grzegorz Grzybek 2017-12-18 10:07 GMT+01:00 Roedl Lukas <lukas.ro...@ait.ac.at>: > +1 (non-binding) > > regards, > Lukas > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Jean-Baptiste Onofré [mailto:j...@nanthrax.net] > Gesendet: Samstag, 16. D

Re: [heads up - long] "Features Processor" that replaces overrides and blacklisting (and more)

processing of unmarshalled features. I'll think about it soon. regards Grzegorz Grzybek > > > 2017-12-06 20:12 GMT+01:00 Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzy...@gmail.com>: > > > Hello again > > > > I'd like to summary recent additions related to my changes: > &g

Re: [heads up - long] "Features Processor" that replaces overrides and blacklisting (and more)

comments/review ;) I know it's not quick fix. If you think I went in wrong direction, please let me know. best regards Grzegorz Grzybek 2017-12-02 21:27 GMT+01:00 Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzy...@gmail.com>: > Hello > > I want to report about my progress with https://issues.apache.org/ &g

[heads up - long] "Features Processor" that replaces overrides and blacklisting (and more)

ome from karaf-maven-plugin configuration (in POM), from externally provided org.apache.karaf.features.xml (e.g., in resource KAR or in POM: /) or from profiles. There are still few things to polish, but I'll appreciate any feedback to check if I misunderstood something or there were other plans related to these mechanisms. The changes are in https://github.com/apache/karaf/commits/KARAF-5376-overrides_v2 branch. best regards Grzegorz Grzybek

Re: [UPDATE] MavenTest itest fails randomly but often

Thanks! I'll have a look too - but not this week. @Ignoring it is good idea for now - timeouts proved to be working well for long time now. regards Grzegorz Grzybek 2017-11-29 7:17 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>: > I excluded MavenTest and now the build is way mo

Re: [UPDATE] MavenTest itest fails randomly but often

@Mikael - that's what I observed too - 2.20.1 had this (intermittent) 30 seconds timeout after test finishes. I don't have time (before Code Europe conf.) to check what's the problem now, but I won't just leave it unexplained... best regards Grzegorz Grzybek 2017-11-28 23:10 GMT+01:00 Mikael

Re: [UPDATE] MavenTest itest fails randomly but often

MavenTest was my non-KarafTestSupport test case. I wanted to be able to configure Maven resolver and Jetty server to test timeouts, http proxies, etc. regards Grzegorz Grzybek 2017-11-27 10:52 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>: > I found something interesting: MavenTes

Re: [UPDATE] MavenTest itest fails randomly but often

I just updated pax-web to use 2.20.1 and all tests are passing (finally) > > regards, Achim > > 2017-11-27 8:28 GMT+01:00 Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzy...@gmail.com>: > > > Hello > > > > I found that maven-surefire-plugin 2.20+ has some problems with pax-exam. >

Re: [UPDATE] MavenTest itest fails randomly but often

. regards Grzegorz Grzybek 2017-11-27 7:32 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>: > Hmm, not sure it's related as we use the same KarafTestSupport in bunch of > other itest. > > I will exclude the MavenTest for now, and investigate. > > Thanks anyway ! > &g

Re: Integrating "overrides" and "blacklisting" for repositories, features and bundles

gards > JB > > On Oct 31, 2017, 12:52, at 12:52, Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzy...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >@JBO sure > > > >I'm on IRC Mon-Fri ;) > > > >I'm not going to force my idea. The reasoning behind this is my > >experience > >when t

Re: Integrating "overrides" and "blacklisting" for repositories, features and bundles

fork. best regards Grzegorz Grzybek 2017-10-31 12:37 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>: > Hi > > From a quick glance, it sounds good to me. However I would like to take a > deeper look and discuss with you about that. > > Regards > JB > > On Oct

Re: Integrating "overrides" and "blacklisting" for repositories, features and bundles

ing/* pax-jsf-support mvn:org.ops4j.pax.web/pax-web-resources-extender/6.0.7 mvn:org.ops4j.pax.web/pax-web-resources-jsf/6.0.7 What do you think? regards Grzegorz Grzybek 2017-10-30 15:08

Integrating "overrides" and "blacklisting" for repositories, features and bundles

h is very fragile, it's slower (than I want) process. I'll continue my work, but I welcome any comments if I attempt something silly. regards Grzegorz Grzybek === [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-5376

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (Container) 4.1.3 release

+1 (non-binding) regards Grzegorz Grzybek 2017-10-27 10:00 GMT+02:00 Andrea Cosentino <ancosen1...@yahoo.com.invalid>: > +1 (non-binding). > > Thanks JB. > > -- > Andrea Cosentino > -- > Apache Camel PMC Member > Apache Karaf

Re: [DISCUSS] Trim down karaf distributions for 4.2

+1 (non binding) regards Grzegorz Grzybek 2017-10-11 15:05 GMT+02:00 Andrea Cosentino <ancosen1...@yahoo.com.invalid>: > +1, it makes sense. > Cheers, > -- > Andrea Cosentino > -- > Apache Camel PMC Member > Apache Karaf Committer >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (Container) 4.0.10 release

+1 (non-binding) regards Grzegorz Grzybek 2017-09-26 14:12 GMT+02:00 Freeman Fang <freeman.f...@gmail.com>: > +1 > > Thanks! > － > Freeman(Yue) Fang > > Red Hat, Inc. > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > > > > > On Sep 25, 2017, at 10:3

Re: "Dynamic" org.apache.karaf.features.internal.service.Overrides#override()

I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-5376 to track this regards Grzegorz Grzybek 2017-09-14 11:58 GMT+02:00 Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzy...@gmail.com>: > Thanks for answer > > 2017-09-14 11:40 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org>: >> &

Re: "Dynamic" org.apache.karaf.features.internal.service.Overrides#override()

Thanks for answer 2017-09-14 11:40 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org>: > > 2017-09-14 9:59 GMT+02:00 Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzy...@gmail.com>: > > > By default we can use etc/overrides.properties file to instruct Karaf to > > install e.g., mvn:commons-

<    1   2   3   4   5   >