On 2011-01-26, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2011-01-26, Michael Herndon wrote:
Is there anything else that needs to be submitted or that we are waiting on
to call for a vote?
Everything is in place, IMHO. I've seen Grant thinks you need one more
mentor but other proposals have passed the vote
supposedly the wiki used to be:http://wiki.apache.org/lucene.net/ according
to http://incubator.apache.org/projects/lucene.net.html but thats currently
not resolving.
Troy referenced http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/lucene.Net in the
proposal so I am going to go with that. I will am going to create some stuff
feel free to edit.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: mhern...@amptools.net [mailto:mhern...@amptools.net] On Behalf Of Michael
Herndon
On 2011-01-26, Michael Herndon wrote:
supposedly the wiki used to be:http://wiki.apache.org/lucene.net/ according
to http://incubator.apache.org/projects/lucene.net.html but thats currently
not resolving.
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/lucene.Net is there (linked from
the main Wiki
Apache has a number of CI options available... For details, see:
http://ci.apache.org/
I'd suggest Hudson.
Regarding Mono support, I think providing a MonoDevelop compatible
solution file, and testing builds in at least one standard Linux
environment will be necessary. I'd suggest Ubuntu 10.4 or
Michael,
On 26.01.2011 19:18, Michael Herndon wrote:
Should the project include build scripts for powershell, nant, albacore
scripts? (would this further entice developers to download the code and
build it)? These also could be available as a separate download.
I don't believe this is
As a consumer (and I think that most consumers would agree), I'd have to
disagree STRONGLY on trading off performance for ease of conversion.
Lucene and Lucene.NET is predicated on performance, compromising that, IMO,
runs contrary to the core principals of Lucene.
- Nick
-Original
Robert,
.
I don't believe this is necessary. At least there were no requests
for alternative build systems in the past.
There may never be a need for the alternative building scripts, its was more
of a curious question. I've seen a few projects on github use both albacore
and psake. Maybe it
On 26.01.2011 19:53, Troy Howard wrote:
Regarding Mono support, I think providing a MonoDevelop compatible
solution file, and testing builds in at least one standard Linux
environment will be necessary. I'd suggest Ubuntu 10.4 or 10.10.
Ubuntu 10.4 comes with Mono 2-4 which is too old for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12986891#action_12986891
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2723:
-
{quote}
I really wish we could debug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera closed LUCENE-724.
-
Resolution: Not A Problem
Due to long inactivity, and because I'm not sure we want to introduce
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera closed LUCENE-344.
-
Resolution: Not A Problem
Assignee: (was: Lucene Developers)
Not sure this is a problem
Track down performance regression on BulkPostings
-
Key: LUCENE-2890
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2890
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Affects Versions: Bulk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-929.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.1
Since ExtractReuters deletes all
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera closed LUCENE-949.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Way outdated code and it's not really clear what needs to be done. If this is
still a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alexander Kanarsky updated SOLR-1983:
-
Attachment: SOLR-1983.patch
Moving the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12986914#action_12986914
]
Alexander Kanarsky commented on SOLR-2156:
--
You added the additional patch after
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera closed LUCENE-1729.
--
Resolution: Not A Problem
Given Uwe's response back in 2009, I think we can close it now :).
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12986920#action_12986920
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-625:
---
What's the status of this? If we want to proceed, I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera closed LUCENE-484.
-
Resolution: Not A Problem
I checked and JSR-170 was last updated in May 2006. Not sure how active is it,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera closed LUCENE-1056.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
I see IndexReader already has flush(). Not sure when it was added, but closing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12986926#action_12986926
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-1056:
-
bq. Not sure when it was added
Seems it was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12986930#action_12986930
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-993:
---
That still happens and I agree this is a bug.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12986934#action_12986934
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-532:
---
I see some progress in that direction was made under
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir reassigned SOLR-1916:
-
Assignee: Robert Muir
investigate DIH use of default locale
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-373:
--
Assignee: (was: Lucene Developers)
This is still a problem with QP. I think we should make the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera closed LUCENE-271.
-
Resolution: Not A Problem
Assignee: (was: Lucene Developers)
This is documented by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated SOLR-1989:
--
Attachment: SOLR-1989.patch
Re-Compilation of source needs to be possible in release artifacts
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler closed LUCENE-1787.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
The old StandardTokenizer behaviour was deprecated in Lucene 3.1 and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera closed LUCENE-382.
-
Resolution: Incomplete
Assignee: (was: Lucene Developers)
This sounds like an offline version
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated SOLR-1916:
--
Attachment: SOLR-1916.patch
patch adding a README.txt to contrib/dataimporthandler with a warning
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler closed LUCENE-1100.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
The old StandardTokenizer behaviour was deprecated in Lucene 3.1 and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shay Banon updated LUCENE-2474:
---
Attachment: MapBackedSet.java
A MapBackedSet implementation, that can wrap a CHM to have a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved SOLR-1826.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.1
Assignee: Robert Muir
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12987003#action_12987003
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-153:
--
Hi Yonik, I've been thinking of some possibilities here
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera closed LUCENE-362.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: (was: Lucene Developers)
Field already has ctor and setter which
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2891:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2891.patch
Patch supports -1 passed to IWC.setReaderTermIndexDivisor and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12987052#action_12987052
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1255:
---
Fix reverted and corrected to disallow
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-1253.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.9
Fixed in LUCENE-1542.
LengthFilter ignoring
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler closed LUCENE-1253.
-
LengthFilter ignoring relative positionIncrement of tokens skipped
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12987058#action_12987058
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2891:
-1 means don't load terms index
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-835?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler closed LUCENE-835.
Resolution: Fixed
Thos issue is very old and got never any response. Also the supplied class
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-835?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler reopened LUCENE-835:
--
An IndexReader with run-time support for synonyms
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12987053#action_12987053
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1253 at 1/26/11 11:05 AM:
On 2011-01-26, Michael Herndon wrote:
Is there anything else that needs to be submitted or that we are waiting on
to call for a vote?
Everything is in place, IMHO. I've seen Grant thinks you need one more
mentor but other proposals have passed the vote with two mentors before
(like the
I have an interesting scoring problem, which I can't seem to get around.
The problem is best stated as follows:
(1)My schema has several independent fields, e.g. value_0, value_1, ...
value_6.
(2)Every document has all of these fields set, with a-priori field norm
values. Where a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12987124#action_12987124
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2891:
-
bq. -1 means don't load terms index because I
In theory you can use ikvmc to compile the Java source files into a .NET DLL
that references some IKVM DLLs and an ikmvc'ed version of OpenJDK's
classlib. After that it is a plain .NET DLL and one could write a .NET
centric API using that DLL.
I haven't really tried it on anything serious and
I updated the wiki with my comments. Please expand on or change my comments.
I provided them as a starting point.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Lombard, Scott [mailto:slomb...@kingindustries.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 12:45 PM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
That and the following probably needs to be branched into a new mail thread
and discussed.
A couple of other topics or questions that might go along with that might
be:
Another topic to cover is if there an actual CI (continuous integration)
Server setup? Do we wish to have one set up if there
Mike, looks like this one is the culprit causing the recent test fails
(ant test-core -Dtestcase=TestIndexReader -Dtestmethod=testDiskFull
-Dtests.seed=-3874264177341011095:-5876795174467582038
-Dtests.multiplier=5)
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 1:05 PM, mikemcc...@apache.org wrote:
Author:
Argh! I will dig.
Mike
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
Mike, looks like this one is the culprit causing the recent test fails
(ant test-core -Dtestcase=TestIndexReader -Dtestmethod=testDiskFull
-Dtests.seed=-3874264177341011095:-5876795174467582038
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12987146#action_12987146
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2883:
--
One concern some people have had is that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reopened LUCENE-2010:
Reopen until I can track down the 3.x fail this caused...
Remove segments with all
A .NET wrapper around the IKVM classes may be a good idea.
I like the idea that IKVM would also allow use of tons of other useful
Java/Lucene code that's out there. There are some filters and analyzers in
Java that might be very useful for my work. That's not really possible with
the line-by-line
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12987162#action_12987162
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2883:
-
{quote}
I'm not against modularizing
Per Michael's suggestion I'm branching this off into a new thread.
I'll start by saying this is somewhere I think I could help alot --
I'm still a recovering liberal arts major so I can't claim to grok too
much of the underlying computer sciency bits. I've also spent as much
if not more time in IT
Can anyone put together a test case and attach it to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380 for evaluation? It seems
like it is worth evaluating.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Hans Merkl [mailto:h...@hmerkl.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 1:39 PM
To:
Hi Soheb,
Sounds good! A few things I thought of:
With regard to #1, would the list of shards to index to (if present) be
exclusive or would we assume that the shard the update request was sent to
should also be included? For example, say, using the example you gave, an
update request was sent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12987186#action_12987186
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2883:
--
Let me try to recap my concerns here (2 main
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12987186#action_12987186
]
Yonik Seeley edited comment on LUCENE-2883 at 1/26/11 2:47 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2892:
Attachment: LUCENE-2892.patch
Add QueryParser.newFieldQuery
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12987197#action_12987197
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2883:
Hey Yonik,
I'm just trying to understand what
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12987204#action_12987204
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2883:
--
Chris: #2 is just an attempted recap of this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12987207#action_12987207
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2883:
Hi,
Hmm I don't really understand that part
Personally I am willing to trade some performance for always being up to
date with the latest Java releases and also being able to use other Java
code. Although as far as I have seen most people say it's at the same speed
or even slightly faster than the .NET version.
I personally would be more
Robert Muir changed the Hudson scripts for the four builds that run ant
generate-maven-artifacts (Lucene-3x, Solr-3x, Lucene-trunk, and Solr-trunk) so
that the builds would not fail as a result of problems running ant
generate-maven-artifacts. This is a good thing.
A secondary effect of his
Although TIKA is a very good project, I've never needed it in windows
environment. Using Ifilter interface solves most(if not all) of the problems
related with converting a document to text.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Hans Merkl [mailto:h...@hmerkl.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26,
Robert Muir changed the Hudson scripts for the four builds that run ant
generate-maven-artifacts (Lucene-3x, Solr-3x, Lucene-trunk, and Solr-
trunk) so that the builds would not fail as a result of problems running ant
generate-maven-artifacts. This is a good thing.
A secondary effect of
Just throwing in my 2 cents. If you're on a tight deadline have you had a
look at Solandra? We were already using Cassandra, so it was incredibly
easy to get a scalable Solr installation up and running.
On 27 January 2011 08:17, Alex Cowell alxc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Soheb,
Sounds good! A
I'm taking these last few comments and copying them over to the Build CI
Considerations thread that Wyatt kindly started.
I'll reply there.
- Michael.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Robert Jordan robe...@gmx.net wrote:
Michael,
On 26.01.2011 19:18, Michael Herndon wrote:
Should the
Maybe you looked at one of the half-hourly builds? They don't build artifacts,
only test.
Uwe
Steven A Rowe sar...@syr.edu schrieb:
On 1/27/2011 at 3:58 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
[...] output from running ant generate-maven-artifacts doesn't
end up in
the console output for the Hudson
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12987223#action_12987223
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1711:
Thanks Johannes, the fix does look correct, and
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Hans Merkl h...@hmerkl.com wrote:
Personally I am willing to trade some performance for always being up to
date with the latest Java releases and also being able to use other Java
code. Although as far as I have seen most people say it's at the same speed
or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-2327.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
committed a patch for force a minimum of 1.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12987244#action_12987244
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-914:
Checking if this issue can be resolved.
There were
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll resolved LUCENE-2609.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.1
Generate jar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2010.
Resolution: Fixed
Remove segments with all documents deleted in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12987254#action_12987254
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2891:
bq. but it allows next()'ing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12987253#action_12987253
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1283:
Since it looks like the primary use of numRead is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley reassigned SOLR-1283:
--
Assignee: Yonik Seeley
Mark Invalid error on indexing
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12987261#action_12987261
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2474:
OK, I cutover to MBS(CHM)!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12987262#action_12987262
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2883:
-
Really back in the days where stuff
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12987267#action_12987267
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2474:
---
I would make the map wrapper final, else no
Hey guys!
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 10:04 +1300, Todd Nine wrote:
Just throwing in my 2 cents. If you're on a tight deadline have you
had a look at Solandra? We were already using Cassandra, so it was
incredibly easy to get a scalable Solr installation up and running.
In short: We are doing
I don't think I was looking at test-only console output.
I checked all of the Hudson console outputs for all four builds, from the day
Robert committed his change until today, and I can't find what I saw. I
*thought* I was looking at console output from one of the four Hudson builds
when I
Hey everyone,
Aside from simply disabling coord for an entire query, I was wondering if
there was a good way to disable coord for a BooleanClause within a query
such that the max coord value, and the overlap value, simply ignore that
clause?
For example, I have the following query:
(apple OR
Interesting datapoint: After the reindexing, the following query returns the
right results in the right order:
(+value_3:Lexington~0.877 +value_1:Massachusetts~0.877 +*:*^0.0 +*:*^0.0
+*:*^0.0)
(+value_3:Lexington~0.877 +value_1:Massachusetts~0.877 +value_4:_empty_
+value_5:_empty_
On build systems -- I think MSBuild can definitely get you where you'd
want to be -- the triple-targeted version I posted had a very rough
MSBuild deployment script. The alternative build systems really
start to shine in places we don't need the help -- we don't need to do
complex packaging, build
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-1283.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed to 3x and trunk.
Mark Invalid error on indexing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2666?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12987328#action_12987328
]
Nick Pellow commented on LUCENE-2666:
-
Hi MIchael,
We have now seen this issue on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12987330#action_12987330
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2263:
This seems reasonable to me - I'll commit shortly
index upgrade tool for /dev-tools
-
Key: LUCENE-2893
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2893
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Robert Muir
we change the index
Use of google-code-prettify for Lucene/Solr Javadoc
---
Key: LUCENE-2894
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2894
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-1987.
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
java.lang.VerifyError runtime exception in Solr 1.4.1 when trying to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12987404#action_12987404
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2609:
Was the purpose of this issue to create a .jar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12987406#action_12987406
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2609:
-
bq. think it'll be more compelling to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12987407#action_12987407
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-914:
---
The method currently has this in its jdocs:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12987408#action_12987408
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2891:
Did you guys review my latest patch, which
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2666?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12987415#action_12987415
]
Nick Pellow commented on LUCENE-2666:
-
Hi Michael,
We've done some analysis on how
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
