Máté Gergely schrieb:
Everything seems to be all right, except that on IE6 the rendering fails
completely:
http://browsershots.org/screenshots/ccae54cac528ec9ece3b116becb8ce3f/
http://browsershots.org/http://sportember.eu/pub/whyooo/index.html
Can anyone please help me solving this?
You may
Stefan Weigel írta:
Can someone point me to the source files?
http://www.openoffice.org/source/browse/why/www/
I have a big problem with the website layout of the Why translation I do.
Here is a to-be-the-first-release version:
http://sportember.eu/pub/whyooo/index.html
Everything seems to
Stefan Weigel írta:
Before working too much on the old one, you may want to check what´s
about the intension to replace thy why pages by new ones:
http://marketing.openoffice.org/tryouts/Why.OpenOffice.org/en/index.html
As far as I remember, André Wyrwa [EMAIL PROTECTED] was working on this
Hi,
I just wanted to point at the new approach of the why pages. I
didn´t say they are necessarily better.
Máté Gergely schrieb:
At a first glance, the tryout generates bad feelings in me. It starts
with talking about a company called Microsoft, and a proprietary Office
Suite that has
Hi,
Máté Gergely schrieb:
I am to translate the (why.openoffice.org) website to Hungarian.
Before working too much on the old one, you may want to check what´s
about the intension to replace thy why pages by new ones:
http://marketing.openoffice.org/tryouts/Why.OpenOffice.org/en/index.html
Hi!
I am to translate the (why.openoffice.org) website to Hungarian. I was
looking around in the marketing projects CVS, but I could not find the
source files. Could someone please point me to the right direction?
Anyway, I have some thoughts to share about the site :-). There are two
I am to translate the (why.openoffice.org) website to Hungarian. I was
looking around in the marketing projects CVS, but I could not find the
source files. Could someone please point me to the right direction?
I believe this is what you are looking for:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
So... please take a look at the site, say what you think is good, what
needs changing, what's redundant, what can be added, etc so that we
can launch this for OOo 3!
The footer part is too small and the logo is only showed half
Perhaps you can
Hi,
thanks for your feedback.
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 22:53 +0700, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote:
http://marketing.openoffice.org/tryouts/Why.OpenOffice.org/en/index.html
Nice, but it would be better to have unscrolled version (by removing
the space between the text and the More Reason...
Hi,
i just commited a few changes to the next gen why.openoffice.org page.
http://marketing.openoffice.org/tryouts/Why.OpenOffice.org/en/index.html
These changes complete the major tours:
- about
- great
- easy
- free
There are still a lot of technical bugs to be fixed, some of the
graphics
http://marketing.openoffice.org/tryouts/Why.OpenOffice.org/en/index.html
Nice, but it would be better to have unscrolled version (by removing
the space between the text and the More Reason... part) if possible,
since it's only a small scroll
Also the website is full of images and javascripts,
Hi again,
Cor Nouws wrote:
John McCreesh wrote:
The ideas I haven't used (yet - I'm open to persuasion) are:
Novell OOo vs StarOffice ... Novell OOo does have some significant
differences from OOo - it's never quite become a fork, but neither is it
the same product ... what do people
John McCreesh wrote:
Thanks for that careful proofreading and helpful suggestions. I've
either included the new text you have provided, or have blended your
ideas into the existing text. The wiki has been updated so you can see
the exact changes in the 'history' tab (this is a really cool
Hi,
Can we put the link to why.openoffice.org on the top page?
:)
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75268
Thanks,
khirano
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Thanks for that careful proofreading and helpful suggestions. I've
either included the new text you have provided, or have blended your
ideas into the existing text. The wiki has been updated so you can see
the exact changes in the 'history' tab (this is a really cool
feature...)
The ideas I
Hi John, other contributors,
John McCreesh wrote:
There is a copy of all the text used on the site on the wiki:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Why#Key_Benefits
please feel free to suggest changes there.
It was a pleasure to read. Many very good passages!
I've added some small ideas
John McCreesh wrote:
The final 'why' site is taking shape, and as it matures we are looking
for ways to bring more people in to help.
[...]
Are there any (worked out) plans for how to handle localisations of this
pages, with regard to the URL's?
(Sorry, I do miss parts of discussions, so
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 10:05 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
John McCreesh wrote:
The final 'why' site is taking shape, and as it matures we are looking
for ways to bring more people in to help.
[...]
Are there any (worked out) plans for how to handle localisations of this
pages, with regard
John McCreesh wrote:
Nearly a year ago we started a discussion on this list about setting up
a site 'why.openoffice.org' to present the case for OpenOffice.org to
users in our target markets in a simple, pictorial form. At last year's
OOoConf I showed a sample of some brilliant designs from the
On 28/02/2007, at 7:46 AM, John McCreesh wrote:
after discussions with the MarCons, we've come up with a site which
captures the main messages in a simple layout, which is now sitting
at:
http://why.openoffice.org
Need get rid of this on the web page...
By any use of this Website, you
On Wed, February 28, 2007 09:04, Jim Watson wrote:
On 28/02/2007, at 7:46 AM, John McCreesh wrote:
after discussions with the MarCons, we've come up with a site which
captures the main messages in a simple layout, which is now sitting
at:
http://why.openoffice.org
Need get rid of this on
Hi John,
John McCreesh wrote:
Nearly a year ago we started a discussion on this list about setting up
a site 'why.openoffice.org' to present the case for OpenOffice.org to
[...]
As always, comments are welcome,
I can make some time to have a good look around next weekend.
Will that be OK?
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 19:25 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi John,
John McCreesh wrote:
Nearly a year ago we started a discussion on this list about setting up
a site 'why.openoffice.org' to present the case for OpenOffice.org to
[...]
As always, comments are welcome,
I can make some
Hi all,
it's not easy to find the right mail to answer with a new idea - but
I'm sure you read all of these mails, so I hope it is okay here ;-)
Finn Gruwier Larsen wrote:
Cor Nouws skrev:
Thanks, that's clear.
In Dutch, the question (why, 'waarom?') en answer (that's why,
'daarom!') are
The site plumbers have now created a holding space for the new 'shop
window' site why.openoffice.org. The 'manifesto' for this mini-site is
here:
http://marketing.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=devmsgNo=23171
I've set up an area within the Marketing section of the wiki with a few
holding
Hi John, all,
Hi,
The site plumbers have now created a holding space for the new 'shop
window' site why.openoffice.org. The 'manifesto' for this mini-site is
here:
http://marketing.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=devmsgNo=23171
Great!
I've set up an area within the Marketing
Hi,
In the brainstorming category:
One idea involving all NLC projects and aimed at communicating the why.OOo
message in an unified and consistent manner in all our native languages:
Having replica sites of the http://why.openoffice.org site in each native
language, presenting in the same manner
Hi,
Louis Suarez-Potts wrote:
Hi,
On 2006-04-15, at 17:54 , John McCreesh wrote:
I'd like to canvass opinion among the marketing project for the launch
of a new theme: Why OpenOffice.org
[snip]
I think this is a splendid idea and merits a URL, why.openoffice.org.
The URL would not
Hi,
On 2006-04-15, at 17:54 , John McCreesh wrote:
I'd like to canvass opinion among the marketing project for the launch
of a new theme: Why OpenOffice.org
[snip]
I think this is a splendid idea and merits a URL,
why.openoffice.org. The URL would not necessitate the creation of
a
Hi John, all,
John McCreesh wrote:
I'd like to canvass opinion among the marketing project for the launch
of a new theme: Why OpenOffice.org
The proposal is that Why OpenOffice.org will be a major theme of our
campaigning in 2006 and for OOoConf 2006. The developments in the
MS-Office 2007
On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 15:49 +0200, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
Hi John, all,
John McCreesh wrote:
I'd like to canvass opinion among the marketing project for the launch
of a new theme: Why OpenOffice.org
The proposal is that Why OpenOffice.org will be a major theme of our
campaigning in
Hi Fin,
Finn Gruwier Larsen wrote:
Cor Nouws skrev:
What about 'Therefore' in stead of 'Why' ?
I think 'why' is the common English word to use here. Besides, it's
shorter and easier to write. So, that's why i'll vote for 'why' (and
not: that's therefore I'll vote for 'why') :-)
Thanks,
Cor Nouws skrev:
Thanks, that's clear.
In Dutch, the question (why, 'waarom?') en answer (that's why,
'daarom!') are of the same length. And I think 'daarom' expresses some
more strength, power. That will be different in every language, I guess.
I't the same in Danish: 'why' = 'hvorfor'
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Cor Nouws wrote:
[snip]
So we might end up with 'Why' international and 'Daarom' in Dutch??
The server can do a redirect as well. So 'why' could be used as the
start page and then the pages that are actually delivered can be on
'therefore'.
-Lars
Lars Noodén ([EMAIL
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi Fin,
Finn Gruwier Larsen wrote:
Cor Nouws skrev:
What about 'Therefore' in stead of 'Why' ?
I think 'why' is the common English word to use here. Besides, it's
shorter and easier to write. So, that's why i'll vote for 'why' (and
Why also asks a question -- inviting the reader to read on to find an
answer. Therefore doesn't draw the reader in in the same way, so it's
not as effective.
Just a thought
Cheers,
Calvin!
Finn Gruwier Larsen wrote:
Cor Nouws skrev:
What about 'Therefore' in stead of 'Why' ?
I think
Hi Calvin,
Calvin Jones wrote:
Why also asks a question -- inviting the reader to read on to find an
answer. Therefore doesn't draw the reader in in the same way, so it's
not as effective.
Just a thought
I think that's the right explanation, Thanks. 'Therefore' fits more for
people
Graham wrote:
John McCreesh wrote:
I'd like to canvass opinion among the marketing project for the launch
of a new theme: Why OpenOffice.org
[...]
Are you in favour of this proposal and can you help?
Thanks - John
Excellent concept John,
+ 1
What about 'Therefore' in stead of 'Why'
Cor Nouws skrev:
What about 'Therefore' in stead of 'Why' ?
I think 'why' is the common English word to use here. Besides, it's
shorter and easier to write. So, that's why i'll vote for 'why' (and
not: that's therefore I'll vote for 'why') :-)
Finn
John McCreesh wrote:
I'd like to canvass opinion among the marketing project for the launch
of a new theme: Why OpenOffice.org
The proposal is that Why OpenOffice.org will be a major theme of our
campaigning in 2006 and for OOoConf 2006. The developments in the
MS-Office 2007 story mean we
I'd like to canvass opinion among the marketing project for the launch
of a new theme: Why OpenOffice.org
The proposal is that Why OpenOffice.org will be a major theme of our
campaigning in 2006 and for OOoConf 2006. The developments in the
MS-Office 2007 story mean we have a golden opportunity
41 matches
Mail list logo
